Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Professional Orders, 69958-69961 [2014-27706]
Download as PDF
69958
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 226 / Monday, November 24, 2014 / Notices
The Commission is extending the 45day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
The proposed rule change would,
among other things, provide new
optional functionality for minimum
quantity orders.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act 5 and for the reasons
stated above, the Commission
designates January 4, 2015, as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rulechange.
Policy .01 to Rule 1.1(ggg) concerning
the definition of an ‘‘order’’ for purposes
of Rule 1.1(ggg). The text of the
proposed rule change is provided below
and in Exhibit 1.
(additions are italicized; deletions are
[bracketed])
*
*
*
*
*
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated Rules
*
*
*
*
*
CHAPTER I
Definitions
¶ 2001 Definitions
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
RULE 1.1 When used in these Rules,
unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) Any term defined in the Bylaws
and not otherwise defined in this
Chapter shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the Bylaws.
(b)–(fff)
[FR Doc. 2014–27699 Filed 11–21–14; 8:45 am]
Professional
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73628; File No. SR–CBOE–
2014–085]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Professional
Orders
November 18, 2014.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
10, 2014, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
definition of ‘‘Professional’’ in Rule
1.1(ggg) and adopt Interpretation and
5 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
6 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Nov 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
(ggg) The term ‘‘Professional’’ means
any person or entity that (i) is not a
broker or dealer in securities, and (ii)
places more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). A Professional will be
treated in the same manner as a broker
or dealer in securities for purposes of
Rules 6.2A, 6.2B, 6.8C, 6.9, 6.13A,
6.13B, 6.25, 6.45, 6.45A (except for
Interpretation and Policy .02), 6.45B
(except for Interpretation and Policy
.02), 6.53C(c)(ii), 6.53C(d)(v),
subparagraphs (b) and (c) under
Interpretation and Policy .06 to Rule
6.53C, 6.74 (except Professional orders
may be considered public customer
orders subject to facilitation under
paragraphs (b) and (d)), 6.74A, 6.74B,
8.13, 8.15B, 8.87, 24.19, 43.1, 44.4,
44.14. The Professional designation is
not available in Hybrid 3.0 classes. All
Professional orders shall be marked
with the appropriate origin code as
determined by the Exchange.
. . . Interpretations And Policies
.01 For purposes of this Rule 1.1(ggg),
an order which is placed for the
beneficial account(s) of a person or
entity that is not a broker or dealer in
securities that is broken into multiple
parts by a broker or dealer or by an
algorithm housed at a broker or dealer
or by an algorithm licensed from a
broker or dealer, but which is housed
with the customer in order to achieve a
specific execution strategy including, for
example, a basket trade, program trade,
portfolio trade, basis trade, or
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
benchmark hedge, constitutes a single
order and shall be counted as one order.
*
*
*
*
*
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s Web
site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
definition of ‘‘Professional’’ to clarify
how orders are computed under Rule
1.1(ggg). Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to adopt Interpretation and
Policy .01 to Rule 1.1(ggg) to its
definition of ‘‘Professional’’ in Rule
1.1(ggg) to provide that for purposes of
Rule 1.1(ggg), an order which is placed
for the beneficial account(s) of a person
or entity that is not a broker or dealer
in securities that is broken into multiple
parts by a broker or dealer or by an
algorithm housed at a broker or dealer
or by an algorithm licensed from a
broker or dealer, but which is housed
with the customer in order to achieve a
specific execution strategy including,
for example, a basket trade, program
trade, portfolio trade, basis trade, or
benchmark hedge, constitutes a single
order and shall be counted as one order.
The Exchange also proposes to add a
provision to Rule 1.1(ggg), which would
provide that all Professional orders shall
be marked with the appropriate origin
code as determined by the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule changes will add clarity
and transparency to its current rules,
which is in the interests of all market
participants. The purpose of this rule
filing is to codify the details of the
Exchange’s existing policies within the
Rules. The Exchange is continuously
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 226 / Monday, November 24, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
evaluating clarifying additions to the
Rules, particularly with respect to order
handling. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change and adoption
of proposed Interpretation and Policy
.01 to Rule 1.1(ggg) is consistent with
this effort.
Background
Under the Exchange’s Rules, ‘‘public
customers’’ are granted certain
marketplace advantages over noncustomers. In particular, public
customer orders receive priority over
non-customer orders and Market-Maker
quotes at the same price. Subject to
certain exceptions, public customer
orders also do not incur transaction
charges. These marketplace advantages
are intended to promote various
business and regulatory objectives
including, but not limited to the
Exchange’s goals of providing
competitive pricing and attracting retail
order flow.
Prior to 2009, the Exchange
designated all orders as either customer
orders or non-customer orders based on
whether an order was placed for the
account of a registered securities broker
or dealer. In general, order priority and
transaction fees were determined solely
on this distinguishing criterion. As
investors’ access to technology and
information increased, however, the
Exchange’s distinction between public
customers and non-customers became
less effective in promoting the intended
purpose of the Rules. As the Exchange
noted at the time, it did not believe that
the definitions of public customer and
non-customer properly distinguished
between the kind of non-professional
retail investors that the order priority
rules and transaction fees exceptions
were intended to benefit.3 Furthermore,
the Exchange believed that
distinguishing solely between registered
broker-dealers and non-broker-dealers
with respect to these advantages was no
longer appropriate in the marketplace
because some non-broker-dealer
individuals and entities have access to
information and technology that enables
them to trade listed options in the same
manner as a broker or dealer in
securities.4 The Exchange therefore did
not believe that it was consistent with
fair competition for these professional
account holders to continue to receive
the same marketplace advantages that
retail investors have over broker-dealers
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
61198 (December 17, 2009), 74 FR 248 (December
29, 2009) (Order Granting Approval of the Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1,
Related to Professional Orders) (SR–CBOE–2009–
078).
4 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Nov 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
trading on the Exchange.5 Accordingly,
in 2009, the Exchange adopted a
definition of ‘‘Professional’’ under Rule
1.1(ggg) to further distinguish different
types of orders placed on the Exchange.6
Under Rule 1.1(ggg), a person or
entity that is not a securities broker or
dealer that places more than 390 listed
options orders per day on average
during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s) is considered a
‘‘Professional.’’ Furthermore, under
Rule 1.1(ggg), a person or entity that is
not a securities broker or dealer that
places more than 390 listed options
orders per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s) is considered a
‘‘Professional’’ and treated in the same
manner as a broker or dealer in
securities with respect to order priority
and transaction fees.7 In general,
‘‘Professionals’’ are treated as brokerdealers with respect to priority of order
and transaction fees under the current
Rules of the Exchange. Rule 1.1(ggg) is
based on and substantially similar to
International Securities Exchange
(‘‘ISE’’) Rule 100(a)(31A) as well as
NASDAQ OMX BX Chapter I, Section
I(a)(49), BATS Exchange Rule
5 See
id.
Rule 1.1(ggg).
7 Under Rule 1.1(ggg), ‘‘Professionals’’ are treated
in the same manner as a broker or dealer in
securities for purposes of Rules 6.2A (Rapid
Opening System), 6.2B (Hybrid Opening System),
6.8C (Prohibition Against Members Functioning as
Market-Makers), 6.9 (Solicited Transactions), 6.13A
(Simple Auction Liaison), 6.13B (Penny Price
Improvement), 6.45 (Priority of bids and Offers—
Allocation of Trades), 6.45A (Priority and
Allocation of Equity Option Trades on the CBOE
Hybrid System) (except that Professional orders
may be considered public customer orders, and
therefore not be subject to the exposure
requirements for solicited broker-dealer orders,
under Interpretation and Policy .02), 6.45B (Priority
and Allocation of Trades in Index Options and
Options on ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System)
(except that Professional orders may be considered
public customer orders, and therefore not be subject
to the exposure requirements for solicited brokerdealer orders, under Interpretation and Policy .02),
6.53C(c)(ii) and (d)(v) and 6.53C.06(b) and (c)
(Complex Orders on the Hybrid System), 6.74
(Crossing Orders) (except that Professional orders
may be considered public customer orders subject
to facilitation under paragraphs (b) and (d)), 6.74A
(Automated Improvement Mechanism) (except
Professional orders may be considered customer
Agency Orders or solicited orders eligible for
customer-to-customer immediate crosses under
Interpretation and Policy .09), 6.74B (Solicitation
Auction Mechanism), 8.13 (Preferred Market-Maker
Program), 8.15B (Participation Entitlement of
LMMs), 8.87 (Participation Entitlement of DPMs
and e-DPMs), 24.19 (Multi-Class Broad-Based Index
Option Spread Orders), 43.1 (Matching Algorithm/
Priority), 44.4 (Obligations of SBT Market-Makers),
and 44.14 (SBT DPM Obligations). See Securities
and Exchange Act Release No. 34–61198 (December
17, 2009), 74 FR 68880 (December 29, 2009) (Order
Granting Approval of the Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, Related to
Professional Orders) (SR–CBOE–2009–078).
6 See
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69959
16.1(a)(45), NASDAQ OMX Phlx Rule
1000(b)(14), BOX Options Exchange
Rule 100(a)(50), and NYSE Amex
Exchange Rule 900.2NY(18A).8 Notably,
several of these exchanges cited uniform
application of Professional Order rules
and discouraging regulatory arbitrage as
primary reasons for adopting a
Professional Order rule.9
Upon adopting Rule 1.1(ggg), the
Exchange issued a Regulatory Circular,
interpreting Rule 1.1(ggg).10 With
respect the counting of single original
orders that are then broken up into
multiple orders to achieve a specific
execution strategy, the Exchange
followed ISE’s interpretation of its Rule
100(a)(31A).11 Under ISE Rule
100(a)(31A), if a customer places a
‘‘parent’’ order that is then broken up by
an executing firm into multiple ‘‘child’’
orders to achieve a specific execution
strategy, the original order is counted as
one order for professional order
purposes.12 ISE recently clarified this
interpretation further, providing that
original orders that are placed on behalf
of the beneficial account of a nonbroker-dealer, which are then broken up
by a broker-dealer (or pursuant to an
algorithm licensed from a broker-dealer)
in order to achieve a specific execution
strategy, such original orders will be
counted as one order for professional
order purposes.13 In order to clarify the
Rules and ensure uniformity with
Professional Order rules in place
throughout the industry, the Exchange
is proposing to codify this interpretation
in the Rules.
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to adopt
Interpretation .01 to Rule 1.1(ggg) to
clarify the Rules and help ensure
uniform compliance. Specifically, the
8 See Securities and Exchange Act Release No.
34–61198 (December 17, 2009), 74 FR 68880
(December 29, 2009) (Order Granting Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, Related to Professional Orders)
(SR–CBOE–2009–078).
9 See, e.g.; Securities and Exchange Act Release
No. 34–62724 (August 16, 2010), 75 FR 51509
(August 20, 2010) (Notice of Filing of a Proposed
Rule Change by the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC To
Adopt a Definition of Professional and Require That
All Professional Orders Be Appropriately Marked)
SR–NASDAQ–2010–099;Securities and Exchange
Act Release No. 34–65500 (October 6, 2011), 76 FR
63686 (October 13, 2011) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Adopt a Definition of Professional and Require
That All Professional Orders Be Appropriately
Marked) SR–BATS–2011–041.
10 See CBOE RG09–148 (Professional Orders).
11 See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2009–
179 (Priority Customer Orders and Professional
Orders (FAQ)).
12 Id.
13 See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2014–
007 (Priority Customer Orders and Professional
Orders (FAQ)).
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69960
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 226 / Monday, November 24, 2014 / Notices
Exchange proposes to codify its current
practice of counting ‘‘parent’’ orders,
placed on a single ticket for the
beneficial account(s) of a person or
entity that is not a broker or dealer in
securities and which are broken into
multiple parts by a broker or dealer or
by an algorithm housed at a broker or
dealer or by an algorithm licensed from
a broker or dealer, but which is housed
with the customer in order to achieve a
specific execution strategy as one order
for Professional Order purposes. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule will add transparency to and
completeness to the Rules, which is in
the best interests of all market
participants.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
rule is in-line with current Exchange
practices and interpretations of nearly
identical rules of other exchanges.14 The
Exchange believes that disparate rules
with respect to Professional order
designation, and lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not
promote the best regulation and may, in
fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. The
Exchange believes that the risk of
regulatory arbitrage is heightened in an
environment where similar rules are
interpreted differently amongst different
exchanges and there is a lack of
uniformity in marking Professional
Orders when routing such orders away.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Rule 1.1(ggg) to provide that all
Professional orders shall be marked
with the appropriate origin code as
determined by the Exchange in order to
bring the Exchange’s rules in-line with
the Professional Order rules of other
exchanges. The Exchange believes that
it is necessary to have uniform
interpretations of Professional Order
designations throughout the industry.
The Exchange also believes that
counting basket trades, program trades,
portfolio trades, basis trades, and
benchmark hedges placed for the
beneficial account(s) of a person or
entity that is not a broker or dealer in
securities and which are broken into
multiple parts by a broker or dealer or
by an algorithm housed at a broker or
dealer or by an algorithm licensed from
a broker or dealer, but which is housed
with the customer as one order for
Professional Order purposes is in-line
with the purpose of its Professional
customer rule and serves the best
interests of investors. The types of
trades cited above are often used by
money managers, pension fund
managers, and others to gain exposure
14 See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2014–
007 (Priority Customer Orders and Professional
Orders (FAQ)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Nov 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
to a particular set of securities at exactly
the same time on behalf of retail
customers and investors. These
strategies are singular strategies, placed
on a single ticket, that are used to avoid
front-running and maintain privacy on
behalf of customers. These trades are
essentially one trade from a strategic
standpoint in that all the terms of the
trade are entered at one point in time on
a single ticket.15 Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that such trades
should be treated as one trade for
Professional order purposes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.16 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 17 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 18 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rules is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 19 with
respect to removal of impediments to,
and perfection of the mechanism of, a
free and open market and national
market system. The Exchange believes
that disparate rules regarding
Professional order designations, and a
lack of uniform application of such
rules, do not promote the best regulation
and may, in fact, encourage regulatory
arbitrage. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that disparate application of
15 Although a change in a parent order’s terms,
price, or size would cause the order to be
considered an additional order under the Rules,
changes to child orders, which are initiated to keep
an overall execution strategy in place, would not
cause a parent order to refresh or result in multiple
orders.
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 Id.
19 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
similar Professional Order rules is
inconsistent with the goals of a national
market system. The Exchange believes
that it is therefore prudent and
necessary to have a Professional
designation rule that is in-line with the
rules of other exchanges. The Exchange
believes that the disparate application of
Professional Order designations would
result in the different treatment of
similar orders, thwarting the principles
underlying order protection rules and
the national market system. The
Exchange believes that an alternative
interpretation of Rule 1.1(ggg) would
result in the disparate treatment retail
investors who the Rules are designed to
grant priority and who might otherwise
be treated as Professionals under the
Rules. As such, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule changes are
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule will promote both intramarket and
intermarket competition by allowing
retail investors to take advantage of the
priority rules that are intended to
benefit them and placing all investors
on equal footing as a result of uniform
rules amongst the various exchanges.
The Exchange believes that disparate
rules with respect to Professional order
designation, and lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not
promote the best regulation and may, in
fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. The
Exchange believes that regulatory
arbitrage contravenes the notion of fair
competition and is not in the best
interests of investors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received written comments on the
proposed rule changes submitted in this
filing.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 20 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.21 Because the
foregoing proposed rule change does
20 15
21 17
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
24NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 226 / Monday, November 24, 2014 / Notices
not: (1) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 22 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 23 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2014–085 on the subject line.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2014–085. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
23 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Nov 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2014–085 and should be submitted on
or before December 15, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–27706 Filed 11–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73620; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–96]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to the NYSE MKT LLC
Equities Proprietary Market Data Fee
Schedule (‘‘Market Data Fee
Schedule’’) Regarding Non-Display
Use Fees
November 18, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on November
7, 2014, NYSE MKT LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
69961
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes Change to the
NYSE MKT LLC Equities Proprietary
Market Data Fee Schedule (‘‘Market
Data Fee Schedule’’) regarding nondisplay use fees.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes a change to
the Market Data Fee Schedule regarding
non-display use fees for NYSE MKT
OpenBook, NYSE MKT Trades, NYSE
MKT BBO and NYSE MKT Order
Imbalances, the market data products to
which non-display use fees apply.
Specifically, with respect to the three
categories of, and fees applicable to,
market data recipients for non-display
use, the Exchange proposes to describe
the three categories in the Market Data
Fee Schedule.
In September 2014, the Exchange
revised the fees for non-display use of
NYSE MKT OpenBook, NYSE MKT
Trades, and NYSE MKT BBO and added
fees for non-display use of NYSE MKT
Order Imbalances.4 In the 2014 Filing,
the Exchange proposed certain changes
to the categories of, and fees applicable
to, data recipients for non-display use.
As set forth in the 2014 Filing: (i)
Category 1 Fees apply when a data
recipient’s non-display use of real-time
market data is on its own behalf as
24 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72020
(September 9, 2014), 79 FR 55040 (September 15,
2014) (SR–NYSEMKT–2014–72) (‘‘2014 Filing’’).
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69958-69961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27706]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73628; File No. SR-CBOE-2014-085]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Professional Orders
November 18, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 10, 2014, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of ``Professional''
in Rule 1.1(ggg) and adopt Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule
1.1(ggg) concerning the definition of an ``order'' for purposes of Rule
1.1(ggg). The text of the proposed rule change is provided below and in
Exhibit 1.
(additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed])
* * * * *
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Rules
* * * * *
CHAPTER I
Definitions
] 2001 Definitions
RULE 1.1 When used in these Rules, unless the context otherwise
requires:
(a) Any term defined in the Bylaws and not otherwise defined in
this Chapter shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the
Bylaws.
(b)-(fff)
Professional
(ggg) The term ``Professional'' means any person or entity that (i)
is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for
its own beneficial account(s). A Professional will be treated in the
same manner as a broker or dealer in securities for purposes of Rules
6.2A, 6.2B, 6.8C, 6.9, 6.13A, 6.13B, 6.25, 6.45, 6.45A (except for
Interpretation and Policy .02), 6.45B (except for Interpretation and
Policy .02), 6.53C(c)(ii), 6.53C(d)(v), subparagraphs (b) and (c) under
Interpretation and Policy .06 to Rule 6.53C, 6.74 (except Professional
orders may be considered public customer orders subject to facilitation
under paragraphs (b) and (d)), 6.74A, 6.74B, 8.13, 8.15B, 8.87, 24.19,
43.1, 44.4, 44.14. The Professional designation is not available in
Hybrid 3.0 classes. All Professional orders shall be marked with the
appropriate origin code as determined by the Exchange.
. . . Interpretations And Policies
.01 For purposes of this Rule 1.1(ggg), an order which is placed
for the beneficial account(s) of a person or entity that is not a
broker or dealer in securities that is broken into multiple parts by a
broker or dealer or by an algorithm housed at a broker or dealer or by
an algorithm licensed from a broker or dealer, but which is housed with
the customer in order to achieve a specific execution strategy
including, for example, a basket trade, program trade, portfolio trade,
basis trade, or benchmark hedge, constitutes a single order and shall
be counted as one order.
* * * * *
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its definition of ``Professional''
to clarify how orders are computed under Rule 1.1(ggg). Specifically,
the Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule
1.1(ggg) to its definition of ``Professional'' in Rule 1.1(ggg) to
provide that for purposes of Rule 1.1(ggg), an order which is placed
for the beneficial account(s) of a person or entity that is not a
broker or dealer in securities that is broken into multiple parts by a
broker or dealer or by an algorithm housed at a broker or dealer or by
an algorithm licensed from a broker or dealer, but which is housed with
the customer in order to achieve a specific execution strategy
including, for example, a basket trade, program trade, portfolio trade,
basis trade, or benchmark hedge, constitutes a single order and shall
be counted as one order. The Exchange also proposes to add a provision
to Rule 1.1(ggg), which would provide that all Professional orders
shall be marked with the appropriate origin code as determined by the
Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes will add
clarity and transparency to its current rules, which is in the
interests of all market participants. The purpose of this rule filing
is to codify the details of the Exchange's existing policies within the
Rules. The Exchange is continuously
[[Page 69959]]
evaluating clarifying additions to the Rules, particularly with respect
to order handling. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
and adoption of proposed Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 1.1(ggg)
is consistent with this effort.
Background
Under the Exchange's Rules, ``public customers'' are granted
certain marketplace advantages over non-customers. In particular,
public customer orders receive priority over non-customer orders and
Market-Maker quotes at the same price. Subject to certain exceptions,
public customer orders also do not incur transaction charges. These
marketplace advantages are intended to promote various business and
regulatory objectives including, but not limited to the Exchange's
goals of providing competitive pricing and attracting retail order
flow.
Prior to 2009, the Exchange designated all orders as either
customer orders or non-customer orders based on whether an order was
placed for the account of a registered securities broker or dealer. In
general, order priority and transaction fees were determined solely on
this distinguishing criterion. As investors' access to technology and
information increased, however, the Exchange's distinction between
public customers and non-customers became less effective in promoting
the intended purpose of the Rules. As the Exchange noted at the time,
it did not believe that the definitions of public customer and non-
customer properly distinguished between the kind of non-professional
retail investors that the order priority rules and transaction fees
exceptions were intended to benefit.\3\ Furthermore, the Exchange
believed that distinguishing solely between registered broker-dealers
and non-broker-dealers with respect to these advantages was no longer
appropriate in the marketplace because some non-broker-dealer
individuals and entities have access to information and technology that
enables them to trade listed options in the same manner as a broker or
dealer in securities.\4\ The Exchange therefore did not believe that it
was consistent with fair competition for these professional account
holders to continue to receive the same marketplace advantages that
retail investors have over broker-dealers trading on the Exchange.\5\
Accordingly, in 2009, the Exchange adopted a definition of
``Professional'' under Rule 1.1(ggg) to further distinguish different
types of orders placed on the Exchange.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-61198 (December
17, 2009), 74 FR 248 (December 29, 2009) (Order Granting Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Related to
Professional Orders) (SR-CBOE-2009-078).
\4\ See id.
\5\ See id.
\6\ See Rule 1.1(ggg).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Rule 1.1(ggg), a person or entity that is not a securities
broker or dealer that places more than 390 listed options orders per
day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s) is considered a ``Professional.'' Furthermore, under Rule
1.1(ggg), a person or entity that is not a securities broker or dealer
that places more than 390 listed options orders per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s) is considered
a ``Professional'' and treated in the same manner as a broker or dealer
in securities with respect to order priority and transaction fees.\7\
In general, ``Professionals'' are treated as broker-dealers with
respect to priority of order and transaction fees under the current
Rules of the Exchange. Rule 1.1(ggg) is based on and substantially
similar to International Securities Exchange (``ISE'') Rule 100(a)(31A)
as well as NASDAQ OMX BX Chapter I, Section I(a)(49), BATS Exchange
Rule 16.1(a)(45), NASDAQ OMX Phlx Rule 1000(b)(14), BOX Options
Exchange Rule 100(a)(50), and NYSE Amex Exchange Rule 900.2NY(18A).\8\
Notably, several of these exchanges cited uniform application of
Professional Order rules and discouraging regulatory arbitrage as
primary reasons for adopting a Professional Order rule.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Under Rule 1.1(ggg), ``Professionals'' are treated in the
same manner as a broker or dealer in securities for purposes of
Rules 6.2A (Rapid Opening System), 6.2B (Hybrid Opening System),
6.8C (Prohibition Against Members Functioning as Market-Makers), 6.9
(Solicited Transactions), 6.13A (Simple Auction Liaison), 6.13B
(Penny Price Improvement), 6.45 (Priority of bids and Offers--
Allocation of Trades), 6.45A (Priority and Allocation of Equity
Option Trades on the CBOE Hybrid System) (except that Professional
orders may be considered public customer orders, and therefore not
be subject to the exposure requirements for solicited broker-dealer
orders, under Interpretation and Policy .02), 6.45B (Priority and
Allocation of Trades in Index Options and Options on ETFs on the
CBOE Hybrid System) (except that Professional orders may be
considered public customer orders, and therefore not be subject to
the exposure requirements for solicited broker-dealer orders, under
Interpretation and Policy .02), 6.53C(c)(ii) and (d)(v) and
6.53C.06(b) and (c) (Complex Orders on the Hybrid System), 6.74
(Crossing Orders) (except that Professional orders may be considered
public customer orders subject to facilitation under paragraphs (b)
and (d)), 6.74A (Automated Improvement Mechanism) (except
Professional orders may be considered customer Agency Orders or
solicited orders eligible for customer-to-customer immediate crosses
under Interpretation and Policy .09), 6.74B (Solicitation Auction
Mechanism), 8.13 (Preferred Market-Maker Program), 8.15B
(Participation Entitlement of LMMs), 8.87 (Participation Entitlement
of DPMs and e-DPMs), 24.19 (Multi-Class Broad-Based Index Option
Spread Orders), 43.1 (Matching Algorithm/Priority), 44.4
(Obligations of SBT Market-Makers), and 44.14 (SBT DPM Obligations).
See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 34-61198 (December 17,
2009), 74 FR 68880 (December 29, 2009) (Order Granting Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Related to
Professional Orders) (SR-CBOE-2009-078).
\8\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 34-61198
(December 17, 2009), 74 FR 68880 (December 29, 2009) (Order Granting
Approval of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No.
1, Related to Professional Orders) (SR-CBOE-2009-078).
\9\ See, e.g.; Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 34-62724
(August 16, 2010), 75 FR 51509 (August 20, 2010) (Notice of Filing
of a Proposed Rule Change by the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC To Adopt a
Definition of Professional and Require That All Professional Orders
Be Appropriately Marked) SR-NASDAQ-2010-099;Securities and Exchange
Act Release No. 34-65500 (October 6, 2011), 76 FR 63686 (October 13,
2011) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Adopt a Definition of Professional and Require That All
Professional Orders Be Appropriately Marked) SR-BATS-2011-041.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon adopting Rule 1.1(ggg), the Exchange issued a Regulatory
Circular, interpreting Rule 1.1(ggg).\10\ With respect the counting of
single original orders that are then broken up into multiple orders to
achieve a specific execution strategy, the Exchange followed ISE's
interpretation of its Rule 100(a)(31A).\11\ Under ISE Rule 100(a)(31A),
if a customer places a ``parent'' order that is then broken up by an
executing firm into multiple ``child'' orders to achieve a specific
execution strategy, the original order is counted as one order for
professional order purposes.\12\ ISE recently clarified this
interpretation further, providing that original orders that are placed
on behalf of the beneficial account of a non-broker-dealer, which are
then broken up by a broker-dealer (or pursuant to an algorithm licensed
from a broker-dealer) in order to achieve a specific execution
strategy, such original orders will be counted as one order for
professional order purposes.\13\ In order to clarify the Rules and
ensure uniformity with Professional Order rules in place throughout the
industry, the Exchange is proposing to codify this interpretation in
the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See CBOE RG09-148 (Professional Orders).
\11\ See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2009-179 (Priority
Customer Orders and Professional Orders (FAQ)).
\12\ Id.
\13\ See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2014-007 (Priority
Customer Orders and Professional Orders (FAQ)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation .01 to Rule 1.1(ggg)
to clarify the Rules and help ensure uniform compliance. Specifically,
the
[[Page 69960]]
Exchange proposes to codify its current practice of counting ``parent''
orders, placed on a single ticket for the beneficial account(s) of a
person or entity that is not a broker or dealer in securities and which
are broken into multiple parts by a broker or dealer or by an algorithm
housed at a broker or dealer or by an algorithm licensed from a broker
or dealer, but which is housed with the customer in order to achieve a
specific execution strategy as one order for Professional Order
purposes. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule will add
transparency to and completeness to the Rules, which is in the best
interests of all market participants.
The Exchange notes that the proposed rule is in-line with current
Exchange practices and interpretations of nearly identical rules of
other exchanges.\14\ The Exchange believes that disparate rules with
respect to Professional order designation, and lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not promote the best regulation and may,
in fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. The Exchange believes that the
risk of regulatory arbitrage is heightened in an environment where
similar rules are interpreted differently amongst different exchanges
and there is a lack of uniformity in marking Professional Orders when
routing such orders away. The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
1.1(ggg) to provide that all Professional orders shall be marked with
the appropriate origin code as determined by the Exchange in order to
bring the Exchange's rules in-line with the Professional Order rules of
other exchanges. The Exchange believes that it is necessary to have
uniform interpretations of Professional Order designations throughout
the industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See ISE Regulatory Information Circular 2014-007 (Priority
Customer Orders and Professional Orders (FAQ)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that counting basket trades, program
trades, portfolio trades, basis trades, and benchmark hedges placed for
the beneficial account(s) of a person or entity that is not a broker or
dealer in securities and which are broken into multiple parts by a
broker or dealer or by an algorithm housed at a broker or dealer or by
an algorithm licensed from a broker or dealer, but which is housed with
the customer as one order for Professional Order purposes is in-line
with the purpose of its Professional customer rule and serves the best
interests of investors. The types of trades cited above are often used
by money managers, pension fund managers, and others to gain exposure
to a particular set of securities at exactly the same time on behalf of
retail customers and investors. These strategies are singular
strategies, placed on a single ticket, that are used to avoid front-
running and maintain privacy on behalf of customers. These trades are
essentially one trade from a strategic standpoint in that all the terms
of the trade are entered at one point in time on a single ticket.\15\
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that such trades should be treated
as one trade for Professional order purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Although a change in a parent order's terms, price, or size
would cause the order to be considered an additional order under the
Rules, changes to child orders, which are initiated to keep an
overall execution strategy in place, would not cause a parent order
to refresh or result in multiple orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\16\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \17\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rules is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \19\ with respect to removal
of impediments to, and perfection of the mechanism of, a free and open
market and national market system. The Exchange believes that disparate
rules regarding Professional order designations, and a lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not promote the best regulation and may,
in fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that disparate application of similar Professional Order rules
is inconsistent with the goals of a national market system. The
Exchange believes that it is therefore prudent and necessary to have a
Professional designation rule that is in-line with the rules of other
exchanges. The Exchange believes that the disparate application of
Professional Order designations would result in the different treatment
of similar orders, thwarting the principles underlying order protection
rules and the national market system. The Exchange believes that an
alternative interpretation of Rule 1.1(ggg) would result in the
disparate treatment retail investors who the Rules are designed to
grant priority and who might otherwise be treated as Professionals
under the Rules. As such, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule will promote both intramarket and
intermarket competition by allowing retail investors to take advantage
of the priority rules that are intended to benefit them and placing all
investors on equal footing as a result of uniform rules amongst the
various exchanges. The Exchange believes that disparate rules with
respect to Professional order designation, and lack of uniform
application of such rules, do not promote the best regulation and may,
in fact, encourage regulatory arbitrage. The Exchange believes that
regulatory arbitrage contravenes the notion of fair competition and is
not in the best interests of investors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments on the
proposed rule changes submitted in this filing.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \20\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\21\
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does
[[Page 69961]]
not: (1) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \23\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2014-085 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2014-085. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2014-085 and should be
submitted on or before December 15, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27706 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P