Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Extension of the Final Results, 69424-69425 [2014-27683]

Download as PDF 69424 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 225 / Friday, November 21, 2014 / Notices Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 83D is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 83’s 2,000acre activation limit. For further information, contact Camille Evans at Camille.Evans@ trade.gov or (202) 482–2350. Dated: November 17, 2014. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–27676 Filed 11–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Dated: November 17, 2014. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [FR Doc. 2014–27653 Filed 11–20–14; 8:45 am] International Trade Administration BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [A–570–601] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Extension of the Final Results Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–143–2014] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone 246—Waco, Texas; Application for Subzone; Spenco Medical Corporation; Waco, Texas An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the City of Waco, grantee of FTZ 246, requesting subzone status for the facility of Spenco Medical Corporation, located in Waco, Texas. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a– 81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on November 17, 2014. The proposed subzone (12.9 acres) is located at 6301 Imperial Drive in Waco. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 246. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is December 31, 2014. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to January 15, 2015. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 20, 2014 Jkt 235001 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 28, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on tapered roller bearings (TRBs) and parts thereof, finished and unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in order to determine whether Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. (SGBC/SKF), a producer/exporter of TRBs in the PRC, is the successor-in-interest to a company revoked from the AD order on TRBs in 1997 (also known as ‘‘SGBC’’). We preliminarily determine that SGBC/SKF is the successor-in-interest to SGBC. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: November 21, 2014. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Banea, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0656. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 15, 1987, the Department published in the Federal Register the AD order on TRBs from the PRC.1 On February 11, 1997, the Department revoked the order on TRBs from the PRC with respect to merchandise produced 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China, 52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and exported by SGBC, effective as of June 1, 1994.2 Effective August 1, 2012, the majority shareholder of SGBC, the General Bearing Corporation (GBC), merged with AB SKF (SKF) and, as a result of the merger, both GBC and SGBC became part of the SKF Group. On February 13, 2013, SGBC/SKF 3 requested that the Department conduct a CCR pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) to determine whether it is the successor-in-interest to SGBC as it existed prior to its affiliation with SKF. On June 28, 2013, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice initiating a CCR to address this question.4 Between July 2013 and February 2014, the Department requested additional information from SGBC/SKF, and SGBC/SKF submitted its responses to these requests from August 2013 through March 2014. Between September 2013 and July 2014, we received comments on SGBC/SKF’s submissions from the Timken Company, the petitioner in this proceeding. In December 2013, we also received comments from Stemco LP (Stemco), a U.S. manufacturer and importer of TRBs. Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China; flange, take up cartridge, and hanger units incorporating tapered roller bearings; and tapered roller housings (except pillow blocks) incorporating tapered rollers, with or without spindles, whether or not for automotive use. These products are currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 8482.20.00, 8482.91.0050, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 8708.99.8115 and, 8708.99.8180. Although the HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 2 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Revocation in Part of Antidumping Duty Order, 62 FR 6189, 6214 (February 11, 1997). 3 Hereinafter, we refer to the post-merger company as SGBC/SKF and the pre-merger entity as SGBC. 4 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 78 FR 38943 (June 28, 2013). E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 225 / Friday, November 21, 2014 / Notices written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Successor-in-Interest Determination In accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we are conducting this CCR based upon the information contained in SGBC/SKF’s and other interested parties’ submissions. In making a successor-in-interest determination, the Department examines several factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the following: (1) Management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base.5 While no single factor or combination of factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication of a successor-ininterest relationship, generally, the Department will consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if the new company’s resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to that of its predecessor.6 Thus, if the record evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the predecessor company, the Department will generally accord the new company the same AD treatment as its predecessor.7 SGBC was revoked from the order in 1997 and became part of the SKF Group in 2012. In conducting a successor-ininterest analysis, while we generally consider information from immediately before and after the formation of a new entity, the Department considers all information on the record relevant to the determination.8 In the instant case, we compared SGBC/SKF to the entity 5 See, e.g., Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Preliminary of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 8925 (February 26, 2010), unchanged in Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 27706 (May 18, 2010); and Brake Rotors from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 69941 (November 18, 2005) (Brake Rotors), citing Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992). 6 See, e.g., Brake Rotors. 7 Id.; see also, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, 2012), unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 77 FR 73619 (December 11, 2012). 8 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 28481, 28482 (May 16, 2014), unchanged in Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 56339 (September 19, 2014). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 20, 2014 Jkt 235001 that was revoked from the order, and we considered the changes to that entity since revocation. Preliminary Results We preliminarily find SGBC/SKF to be the successor-in-interest to SGBC because the information on the record indicates that SGBC/SKF continues to operate as essentially the same entity that was revoked from the order. Although there were changes in SGBC’s production process and board membership after revocation, these changes were made over a number of years and do not appear to be linked to changes in ownership structure. Rather, they are changes generally in the normal course of business that would occur over such a long period (i.e., approximately two decades). Thus, after considering the facts on the record as a whole, we do not find that SGBC/SKF’s operations (based on an examination of its management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customer base), changed so significantly such that we would find that that it is a different entity from SGBC. For the Department’s detailed analysis, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.9 Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any interested party may request a hearing within 10 business days of publication of this notice.10 Parties will be notified of the time and date of any hearing, if requested. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 10 business days after the publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, and rebuttals to written comments, which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs or comments, may be filed not later than 15 business days after the date of publication of this notice.11 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this CCR are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; and (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. 9 See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance entitled, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review Requested by Shanghai General Bearing Company: Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 10 This regulation authorizes the Department to alter the time limit for requesting a hearing; see also 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements. 11 This regulation authorizes the Department to alter the time limit for submitting case briefs. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 69425 Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department’s electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the document is due. Final Results of the Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the final results of this CCR are due on November 29, 2014. However, 19 CFR 351.302(b) provides that the Department may, for good cause, extend any time limit unless expressly precluded by statute. Therefore, to provide time for an adequate briefing schedule and to analyze the comments received, if any, we are extending the time period for issuing the final results of this CCR until January 31, 2015. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221. Dated: November 17, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–27683 Filed 11–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–849] Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: November 21, 2014. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL plate’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. This review covers AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69424-69425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-601]


Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary 
Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Extension of the Final 
Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 28, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 
(AD) order on tapered roller bearings (TRBs) and parts thereof, 
finished and unfinished, from the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 
order to determine whether Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. (SGBC/
SKF), a producer/exporter of TRBs in the PRC, is the successor-in-
interest to a company revoked from the AD order on TRBs in 1997 (also 
known as ``SGBC''). We preliminarily determine that SGBC/SKF is the 
successor-in-interest to SGBC. Interested parties are invited to 
comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Effective Date: November 21, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Banea, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0656.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 15, 1987, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the AD order on TRBs from the PRC.\1\ On February 11, 1997, the 
Department revoked the order on TRBs from the PRC with respect to 
merchandise produced and exported by SGBC, effective as of June 1, 
1994.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Tapered Roller Bearings and 
Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic 
of China, 52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987).
    \2\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Revocation in Part of 
Antidumping Duty Order, 62 FR 6189, 6214 (February 11, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Effective August 1, 2012, the majority shareholder of SGBC, the 
General Bearing Corporation (GBC), merged with AB SKF (SKF) and, as a 
result of the merger, both GBC and SGBC became part of the SKF Group. 
On February 13, 2013, SGBC/SKF \3\ requested that the Department 
conduct a CCR pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) to determine whether 
it is the successor-in-interest to SGBC as it existed prior to its 
affiliation with SKF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Hereinafter, we refer to the post-merger company as SGBC/SKF 
and the pre-merger entity as SGBC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 28, 2013, the Department published in the Federal Register 
a notice initiating a CCR to address this question.\4\ Between July 
2013 and February 2014, the Department requested additional information 
from SGBC/SKF, and SGBC/SKF submitted its responses to these requests 
from August 2013 through March 2014. Between September 2013 and July 
2014, we received comments on SGBC/SKF's submissions from the Timken 
Company, the petitioner in this proceeding. In December 2013, we also 
received comments from Stemco LP (Stemco), a U.S. manufacturer and 
importer of TRBs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of 
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 78 FR 38943 (June 28, 
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    Imports covered by the order are shipments of tapered roller 
bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished, from the People's 
Republic of China; flange, take up cartridge, and hanger units 
incorporating tapered roller bearings; and tapered roller housings 
(except pillow blocks) incorporating tapered rollers, with or without 
spindles, whether or not for automotive use. These products are 
currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS) item numbers 8482.20.00, 8482.91.0050, 8482.99.15, 
8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 
8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 
8708.99.8115 and, 8708.99.8180. Although the HTSUS item numbers are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the

[[Page 69425]]

written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.

Successor-in-Interest Determination

    In accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), we are conducting this CCR based upon the 
information contained in SGBC/SKF's and other interested parties' 
submissions. In making a successor-in-interest determination, the 
Department examines several factors, including, but not limited to, 
changes in the following: (1) Management; (2) production facilities; 
(3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base.\5\ While no single 
factor or combination of factors will necessarily provide a dispositive 
indication of a successor-in-interest relationship, generally, the 
Department will consider the new company to be the successor to the 
previous company if the new company's resulting operation is not 
materially dissimilar to that of its predecessor.\6\ Thus, if the 
record evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and 
sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same 
business entity as the predecessor company, the Department will 
generally accord the new company the same AD treatment as its 
predecessor.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See, e.g., Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: 
Preliminary of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 
8925 (February 26, 2010), unchanged in Pressure Sensitive Plastic 
Tape from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 
Circumstances Review, 75 FR 27706 (May 18, 2010); and Brake Rotors 
from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed 
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 69941 
(November 18, 2005) (Brake Rotors), citing Brass Sheet and Strip 
from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992).
    \6\ See, e.g., Brake Rotors.
    \7\ Id.; see also, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, 2012), 
unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 
Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 77 FR 73619 
(December 11, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SGBC was revoked from the order in 1997 and became part of the SKF 
Group in 2012. In conducting a successor-in-interest analysis, while we 
generally consider information from immediately before and after the 
formation of a new entity, the Department considers all information on 
the record relevant to the determination.\8\ In the instant case, we 
compared SGBC/SKF to the entity that was revoked from the order, and we 
considered the changes to that entity since revocation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 28481, 28482 
(May 16, 2014), unchanged in Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 
FR 56339 (September 19, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results

    We preliminarily find SGBC/SKF to be the successor-in-interest to 
SGBC because the information on the record indicates that SGBC/SKF 
continues to operate as essentially the same entity that was revoked 
from the order. Although there were changes in SGBC's production 
process and board membership after revocation, these changes were made 
over a number of years and do not appear to be linked to changes in 
ownership structure. Rather, they are changes generally in the normal 
course of business that would occur over such a long period (i.e., 
approximately two decades). Thus, after considering the facts on the 
record as a whole, we do not find that SGBC/SKF's operations (based on 
an examination of its management, production facilities, supplier 
relationships, and customer base), changed so significantly such that 
we would find that that it is a different entity from SGBC. For the 
Department's detailed analysis, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance 
entitled, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review Requested by Shanghai 
General Bearing Company: Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 
Finished and Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China,'' 
dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this 
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any interested party may request a 
hearing within 10 business days of publication of this notice.\10\ 
Parties will be notified of the time and date of any hearing, if 
requested. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 
submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 10 business 
days after the publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, and 
rebuttals to written comments, which must be limited to issues raised 
in such briefs or comments, may be filed not later than 15 business 
days after the date of publication of this notice.\11\ Parties who 
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this CCR are requested to 
submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; and (2) a 
brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. 
Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must 
file briefs electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://iaaccess.trade.gov. An electronically-filed document must be 
received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic 
records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the 
document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ This regulation authorizes the Department to alter the time 
limit for requesting a hearing; see also 19 CFR 351.303 for general 
filing requirements.
    \11\ This regulation authorizes the Department to alter the time 
limit for submitting case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the final results of this CCR 
are due on November 29, 2014. However, 19 CFR 351.302(b) provides that 
the Department may, for good cause, extend any time limit unless 
expressly precluded by statute. Therefore, to provide time for an 
adequate briefing schedule and to analyze the comments received, if 
any, we are extending the time period for issuing the final results of 
this CCR until January 31, 2015.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221.

    Dated: November 17, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-27683 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P