Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 68408-68410 [2014-27165]
Download as PDF
68408
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices
Branch (5 CFR part 2635), and Executive
Order 12674 (as modified by Executive
Order 12731). Management and support
services shall be provided by the
Economics and Statistics
Administration.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Compensation
Membership is under voluntary
circumstances and therefore members
do not receive compensation for service
on the Commerce Data Advisory
Council. Members shall receive per
diem and travel expenses as authorized
by 5 U.S.C. 5703, as amended, for
persons employed intermittently in the
Government service. Members who are
officers or employees of the United
States Government shall not receive
compensation for service on the
Council.
V. Nominations
The Secretary will consider
nominations of all qualified individuals
to ensure that the CDAC includes the
areas of subject matter expertise noted
above (see ’’Structure’’). Individuals
may nominate themselves or other
individuals, and professional
associations and organizations may
nominate one or more qualified persons
for membership on the CDAC.
Nominations shall state that the
nominee is willing to serve as a member
of the Council.
A nomination package should include
the following information for each
nominee: (1) A letter of nomination
stating the name, affiliation, and contact
information for the nominee, the basis
for the nomination (i.e., what specific
attributes recommend him/her for
service in this capacity), and the
nominee’s field(s) of expertise; (2) a
biographical sketch of the nominee and
a copy of his/her curriculum vitae; and
(3) the name, return address, email
address, and daytime telephone number
at which the nominator can be
contacted.
The Department of Commerce has
special interest in assuring that women,
minority groups, and the physically
disabled are adequately represented on
advisory committees; and therefore,
extends particular encouragement to
nominations for appropriately qualified
female, minority, or disabled
candidates. The Department of
Commerce also encourages geographic
diversity in the composition of the
Council. All nomination information
should be provided in a single,
complete package within 30 days of the
publication of this notice. Interested
applicants should send their
nomination package to the email or
postal address provided above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Nov 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
Potential candidates will be asked to
provide detailed information concerning
financial interests, consultancies,
research grants, and/or contracts that
might be affected by recommendations
of the Council to permit evaluation of
possible sources of conflicts of interest.
Finally, nominees will be required to
certify that they are not subject to the
Foreign Agents Registration Act (22
U.S.C. 611) or the Lobbying Disclosure
Act (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
Dated: November 3, 2014.
Austin Durrer,
Chief of Staff for Under Secretary for
Economic Affairs.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Whiteman at
Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202)
482–0473.
[FR Doc. 2014–26778 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am]
Dated: November 12, 2014.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
BILLING CODE 3510–P
[FR Doc. 2014–27196 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
International Trade Administration
[S–138–2014]
[A–588–850]
Foreign-Trade Zone 245—Decatur,
Illinois; Application for Subzone;
Schumacher Electric Corporation;
Hoopeston, Illinois
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Economic Development
Corporation of Decatur and Macon
County, grantee of FTZ 245, requesting
subzone status for the facility of
Schumacher Electric Corporation
(Schumacher), located in Hoopeston,
Illinois. The application was submitted
pursuant to the provisions of the
Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations
of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was
formally docketed on November 12,
2014.
The proposed subzone (4.8 acres) is
located at 1025 E. Thompson Avenue,
Hoopeston, Vermilion County. No
authorization for production activity has
been requested at this time. The
proposed subzone would be subject to
the existing activation limit of FTZ 245.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to
review the application and make
recommendations to the Executive
Secretary.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is
December 29, 2014. Rebuttal comments
in response to material submitted
during the foregoing period may be
submitted during the subsequent 15-day
period to January 12, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and
Pressure Pipe From Japan: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 23, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
large diameter carbon and alloy
seamless standard, line, and pressure
pipe (over 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan for
the period of review (POR) of June 1,
2012 through May 31, 2013. For these
final results, we continue to find that
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI)
failed to cooperate to the best of its
ability and, accordingly, the Department
is applying AFA to SMI. In addition, we
find that no shipments were made by
JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon
Steel Corporation (Nippon), and NKK
Tubes (NKK) during the POR.
DATES: Effective Date: November 17,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2778.
AGENCY:
Background
On July 23, 2014, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain large
diameter carbon and alloy seamless
standard, line, and pressure pipe from
Japan.1 We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.
We received no comments. The
Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
large diameter seamless carbon and
alloy (other than stainless) steel
standard, line, and pressure pipes
produced, or equivalent, to the
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) A–53, ASTM A–106,
ASTM A–333, ASTM A- 334, ASTM A–
589, ASTM A–795, and the American
Petroleum Institute (API) 5L
specifications and meeting the physical
parameters described below, regardless
of application. The scope of the order
also includes all other products used in
standard, line, or pressure pipe
applications and meeting the physical
parameters described below, regardless
of specification, with the exception of
the exclusions discussed below.
Specifically included within the scope
of the order are seamless pipes greater
than 4.5 inches (114.3 mm) up to and
including 16 inches (406.4 mm) in
outside diameter, regardless of wallthickness, manufacturing process (hot
finished or cold-drawn), end finish
(plain end, beveled end, upset end,
threaded, or threaded and coupled), or
surface finish.
The seamless pipes subject to the
order are currently classifiable under
the subheadings 7304.10.10.30,
7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60,
7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30,
7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60,
7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10,
7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04,
7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08,
7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40,
7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48,
7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56,
7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68,
7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15,
7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60,
7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55,
7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70,
7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30,
7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40,
7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50,
1 See
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy
Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over
41⁄2 Inches) from Japan: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 42762 (July 23, 2014) (Preliminary
Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Nov 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60,
7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the merchandise
subject to the scope is dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We have made no changes to our
findings announced in the Preliminary
Results. Consistent with our findings in
the Preliminary Results,2 we find that
JFE, Nippon, and NKK had no
shipments during the POR.
Methodology
Also consistent with the Preliminary
Results,3 and in accordance with
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, we
relied on facts available with an adverse
inference with respect to SMI. Thus, we
assign a rate of 107.80 percent as the
weighted-average dumping margin for
SMI with respect to one of its entries,
while we continue to find that SMI had
no other shipments during the POR. For
a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
We determine that, for the period June
1, 2012, through May 31, 2013, the
following dumping margin exists for a
certain entry for SMI:
Company
Rate
(percent)
Sumitomo Metal Industries,
Ltd. ....................................
107.80
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
are effective for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or
2 See
3 Id.
PO 00000
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–10.
at 7–10.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68409
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
of the final results of this administrative
review, as provided in section 751(a)(1)
of the Act: (1) Cash-deposit rate for SMI
will be that established in the final
results of this review; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
covered in this review, the cash-deposit
rate will continue to be the rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the lessthan fair-value (LTFV) investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the subject merchandise; (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a
firm covered in this or any previous
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the allothers rate established in the LTFV
investigation, which is 68.88 percent.4
These cash-deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of this
review.
These final results of this review are
the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by this review and
for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.5 Where assessments
are based upon total facts available,
including total AFA, we instruct CBP to
assess duties at the AFA margin rate.
The Department intends to instruct CBP
to assess antidumping duties on the
single POR entry of the subject
merchandise produced or exported by
SMI at the rate of 107.80 percent of the
entered value.6
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.7 This clarification will
apply to all POR entries entered under
the case numbers for JFE, Nippon, and
4 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and
Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and
the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26,
2000) (LTFV Investigation).
5 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
68410
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices
NKK, and certain entries entered under
the case number for SMI for which we
determined SMI demonstrated its
certification of no POR shipments. We
will instruct CBP to liquidate these
entries at the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation, 68.88
percent,8 if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the
transaction. See Assessment Policy
Notice for a full discussion of this
clarification.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notifications
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 28, 2014, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘CIT’’) sustained the Department
of Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’)
results of redetermination, pursuant to
the CIT’s remand order, in Lifestyle
Enterprise, Inc., et al., v. United States,
Consol. Ct. No. 09–00378.1 Consistent
with the decision of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United
States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the
Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s AR 3
Final Results 2 and is amending the final
results with respect to the margins
assigned to Guandong Yihua Timber
Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yihua Timber’’) for
the period of review (‘‘POR’’) January 1,
2007 through December 31, 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: November 7,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Subsequent to the publication of the AR
3 Final Results, various plaintiffs filed
complaints with the CIT to challenge
Dated: November 7, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–27165 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Final Results of Administrative Review
and Notice of Amended Final Results
of Administrative Review Pursuant to
Court Decision
1 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Fourth Remand, Court No. 09–00378, dated
October 16, 2014, available at: https://
enforcement.trade.gov/remands/ (‘‘WBF
Final Remand’’).
2 See Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews:
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s
Republic of China, 74 FR 41374 (August 17, 2009),
as amended by Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New
Shipper Reviews: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From
the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 55810
(October 29, 2009) (collectively, ‘‘AR 3 Final
Results’’).
LTFV Investigation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[A–570–890]
AGENCY:
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
8 See
International Trade Administration
17:14 Nov 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
certain aspects of the AR 3 Final Results
of the Department’s third administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on wooden bedroom furniture from the
People’s Republic of China.
In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United
States, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (Ct. Int’l
Trade 2011), the CIT remanded the case
to the Department to ‘‘explain or
otherwise resolve’’ Orient International
Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co.
Ltd.’s (‘‘Orient’’) separate rate, the data
set for wood inputs, the tariff heading
for medium density fiberboard, whether
Global Classic Designs, Inc, and Diretso
Design Furnitures, Inc. produce
comparable merchandise through a
comparable production process,
surrogate labor value, and negative
export pricing.
In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United
States, 844 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (Ct. Int’l
Trade 2012), the CIT remanded the case
to the Department to re-determine
Orient’s AFA rate and to re-open the
record to gather more evidence with
respect to wood inputs, or to use the
volume-based data set to value wood
inputs.
In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United
States, 865 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (Ct. Int’l
Trade 2012), the CIT remanded the issue
of Orient’s AFA rate to the Department
for reconsideration for a second time.
In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United
States, 751 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014),
the CAFC reversed the CIT’s decision to
require the use of volume-based data in
valuing the lumber inputs, and
remanded the issue to the Department
for further proceedings consistent with
its opinion.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at
341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,
the CAFC held that, pursuant to section
516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’), the Department
must publish a notice of a court
decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with
a Department determination and must
suspend liquidation of entries pending
a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
October 28, 2014, judgment sustaining
the WBF Final Remand constitutes a
final decision of that court that is not in
harmony with the AR 3 Final Results.
This notice is published in fulfillment
of the publication requirements of
Timken.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision with respect to the AR 3 Final
Results, the revised weighted-average
dumping margin for the period January
1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, for
Yihua Timber is 21.53 percent. The
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68408-68410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-850]
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line,
and Pressure Pipe From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 23, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy
seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4 \1/2\ inches) from
Japan for the period of review (POR) of June 1, 2012 through May 31,
2013. For these final results, we continue to find that Sumitomo Metal
Industries, Ltd. (SMI) failed to cooperate to the best of its ability
and, accordingly, the Department is applying AFA to SMI. In addition,
we find that no shipments were made by JFE Steel Corporation (JFE),
Nippon Steel Corporation (Nippon), and NKK Tubes (NKK) during the POR.
DATES: Effective Date: November 17, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2778.
Background
On July 23, 2014, the Department published the preliminary results
of the
[[Page 68409]]
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain large
diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe
from Japan.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received no comments. The Department has
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2012-2013, 79 FR 42762 (July 23, 2014) (Preliminary Results) and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are large diameter seamless
carbon and alloy (other than stainless) steel standard, line, and
pressure pipes produced, or equivalent, to the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) A-53, ASTM A-106, ASTM A-333, ASTM A- 334,
ASTM A-589, ASTM A-795, and the American Petroleum Institute (API) 5L
specifications and meeting the physical parameters described below,
regardless of application. The scope of the order also includes all
other products used in standard, line, or pressure pipe applications
and meeting the physical parameters described below, regardless of
specification, with the exception of the exclusions discussed below.
Specifically included within the scope of the order are seamless pipes
greater than 4.5 inches (114.3 mm) up to and including 16 inches (406.4
mm) in outside diameter, regardless of wall-thickness, manufacturing
process (hot finished or cold-drawn), end finish (plain end, beveled
end, upset end, threaded, or threaded and coupled), or surface finish.
The seamless pipes subject to the order are currently classifiable
under the subheadings 7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60,
7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60,
7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04,
7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40,
7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56,
7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15,
7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55,
7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30,
7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50,
7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the merchandise subject to the scope is
dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained
in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov
and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We have made no changes to our findings announced in the
Preliminary Results. Consistent with our findings in the Preliminary
Results,\2\ we find that JFE, Nippon, and NKK had no shipments during
the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Also consistent with the Preliminary Results,\3\ and in accordance
with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, we relied on facts available
with an adverse inference with respect to SMI. Thus, we assign a rate
of 107.80 percent as the weighted-average dumping margin for SMI with
respect to one of its entries, while we continue to find that SMI had
no other shipments during the POR. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id. at 7-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that, for the period June 1, 2012, through May 31,
2013, the following dumping margin exists for a certain entry for SMI:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company Rate (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd......................... 107.80
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements are effective for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided in section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1)
Cash-deposit rate for SMI will be that established in the final results
of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies
not covered in this review, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be
the rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than
fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation, which is
68.88 percent.\4\ These cash-deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Large
Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe
from Japan; and Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and the Republic of
South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000) (LTFV Investigation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of this review.
These final results of this review are the basis for the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review
and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\5\ Where
assessments are based upon total facts available, including total AFA,
we instruct CBP to assess duties at the AFA margin rate. The Department
intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on the single POR
entry of the subject merchandise produced or exported by SMI at the
rate of 107.80 percent of the entered value.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\7\ This clarification will apply to all POR entries
entered under the case numbers for JFE, Nippon, and
[[Page 68410]]
NKK, and certain entries entered under the case number for SMI for
which we determined SMI demonstrated its certification of no POR
shipments. We will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation, 68.88 percent,\8\ if
there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the transaction. See
Assessment Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice).
\8\ See LTFV Investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 7, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-27165 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P