Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 64170-64172 [2014-25611]

Download as PDF 64170 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 29, 2014. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Joe Carter—Office of Strategic Planning, 1999 Broadway— Suite 2205, Denver, CO 80220, (303) 844–5656, joe.carter@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: I. Abstract The International Trade Administration provides a multitude of international trade related programs to help U.S. businesses. These programs include information products, services, and trade events. To accomplish its mission effectively, ITA needs ongoing feedback on its programs. This information collection item allows ITA to solicit clients’ opinions about the use of ITA products, services, and trade events. To promote optimal use and provide focused and effective improvements to ITA programs, we are requesting approval for this clearance package; Including: Use of Comment Cards (i.e. transactional-based surveys) to collect feedback immediately after ITA assistance is provided to clients; use of annual surveys (i.e. relationshipbased surveys) to gauge overall satisfaction, impact and needs for clients with ITA assistance provided over a period time; use of multiple data collection methods (i.e. web-enabled surveys sent via email, telephone interviews, automated telephone surveys, and in-person surveys via mobile devices/laptops/tablets at trade events/shows) to enable clients to conveniently respond to requests for feedback; and a forecast of burden hours. Without this information, ITA is unable to systematically determine the actual and relative levels of performance for its programs and products/services and to provide clear, actionable insights for managerial intervention. This VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 information will be used for program evaluation and improvement, strategic planning, allocation of resources and stakeholder reporting. II. Method of Collection The International Trade Administration is seeking approval for the following data collection methods to provide flexibility in conducting customer satisfaction surveys and to reduce the burden on respondents: (1) An email message delivering a hot link to a web enabled survey with an email reminder sent if the client does not respond to the survey within two weeks; (2) a telephone survey/interview; (3) an automated telephone survey for callers to 1–800–USA–TRADE so callers can immediately respond without having to provide their email address; and (4) a web-enabled survey conducted inperson at trade shows/events via a laptop, tablet or mobile phone so participants can immediately respond without having to provide their email address. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0625–XXX. Form Number(s): ITA–XXXXP. Type of Review: Regular submission; new information collection; generic clearance. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local, or Tribal government; and Federal government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 30,000. Estimated Time per Response: 5–20 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 5,000 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $200,000. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: October 22, 2014. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–25489 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–502] Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 24, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand.1 This review covers two producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise, Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai), and Pacific Pipe Company Limited (Pacific Pipe). The period of review (POR) is March 1, 2012, through February 28, 2013. The Department received comments from interested parties. For the final results, we find that Saha Thai has not sold subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV), and we continue to find that Pacific Pipe had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Effective Date: October 28, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Rhoads, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0123. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On April 24, 2014, the Department published, and invited interested parties to comment on, the Preliminary Results. Saha Thai and Wheatland Tube Company submitted case briefs on June 16, 2014, and submitted rebuttal briefs on June 23, 2014. 1 See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 79 FR 22794 (April 24, 2014) (Preliminary Results). E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The products covered by the antidumping order are certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand.2 The subject merchandise has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not exceeding 16 inches. The merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085 and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and purposes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record as well as comments received from parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made two revisions to Saha Thai’s margin calculation for the final results. We (1) used Saha Thai’s most up-to-date cost of production file, and (2) adjusted Saha Thai’s duty drawback amount so that the amount added to export price is consistent with the amount added to Saha Thai’s calculated cost of production.4 Final Determination of No Shipments For the final results of this review, we continue to find that Pacific Pipe had no shipments during the POR.3 asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of issues that parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: 2012–2013 Administrative Review,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), for a complete description of the scope of the order. 3 See Preliminary Results. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 64171 liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. Consistent with the Assessment Policy Notice, because we continue to find that Pacific Pipe had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all applicable entries of merchandise produced by Pacific Pipe and exported by other parties at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements Final Results of Review As a result of our review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the period March 1, 2011, through February 29, 2012. The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Weighted-average for consumption on or after the date of Producer/exporter dumping margin publication as provided by section (percent) 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Saha Thai will be 0.00 percent, Saha Thai Steel Pipe the weighted-average dumping margin (Public) Company, Ltd ............................. 0.00 established in the final results of this Pacific Pipe Company administrative review; (2) for Pacific Limited ....................... (*) Pipe and previously reviewed or * No shipments or sales subject to this re- investigated companies not listed above, view. The firm has an individual rate from the the cash deposit rate will continue to be last segment of the proceeding in which the the company-specific rate published for firm had shipments or sales. the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not Assessment Rates a firm covered in this review, a prior In accordance with 19 CFR review, or the less than fair value 351.106(c)(2) and the Final Modification (LTFV) investigation, but the for Reviews,5 the Department will manufacturer is, then the cash deposit instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate rate will be the rate established for the entries for Saha Thai without regard to most recently completed segment of this antidumping duties. proceeding for the manufacturer of the The Department clarified its merchandise; and (4) if neither the ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm May 6, 2003.6 This clarification applies to entries of subject merchandise during covered in this or any previous review or the LTFV investigation, then the cash the POR produced by Saha Thai for deposit rate will be the ‘‘all-others’’ rate which it did not know its merchandise of 15.67 percent established in the LTFV was destined for the United States. In investigation.7 These deposit rates, such instances, we will instruct CBP to when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. 4 See Saha Thai’s Final Analysis Memorandum and Memorandum to the File, entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review of Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Analysis Memorandum for Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). 6 For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could 7 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986). E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1 64172 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 21, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Comment 1: The Department Inadvertently Used the Incorrect Section D Cost File in the Preliminary Results Calculations Comment 2: For Transactions with Sale Dates Prior to the POR, the Department Should Use the Corresponding Costs from the Prior POR Comment 3: The Department Should Revise Saha Thai’s Reported Costs To Exclude the Grade B Adjustments Comment 4: Calculation of Saha Thai’s Freight Revenue Cap Comment 5: Withdrawal of the Regulatory Provisions Governing Targeted Dumping in Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Comment 6: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Methodology in Administrative Reviews Comment 7: Differential Pricing Comment 8: Calculation of Saha Thai’s Duty Drawback Adjustment Comment 9: Application of Adverse Facts Available to Affiliated Party Transactions Discovered at Verification [FR Doc. 2014–25611 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC), Extension of Time To Submit Nominations International Trade Administration, DOC. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 Solicitation of Nominations for Membership to the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee. ACTION: This notice extends until November 14, 2014, the time period for submission of nominations for membership to the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC or Committee). The original notice soliciting nominations was published on September 5, 2014 (79 FR 53017). ETTAC was established pursuant to Title IV of the Jobs Through Trade Expansion Act, 22 U.S.C. 2151, and under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2. ETTAC was first chartered on May 31, 1994. ETTAC serves as an advisory body to the Environmental Trade Working Group of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC), reporting directly to the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) in his/her capacity as Chair of the TPCC. ETTAC advises on the development and administration of programs to expand U.S. exports of environmental technologies, goods, and services. DATES: Nominations for membership must be received on or before November 14, 2014. ADDRESSES: Please send nominations by post, email, or fax to the attention of Maureen Hinman, Designated Federal Officer/ETTAC, Office of Energy & Environmental Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 4053, Washington, DC 20230; phone 202–482–0627; or email maureen.hinman@trade.gov; fax 202– 482–5665. Electronic responses should be submitted in Microsoft Word format. Nominations: The Secretary invites nominations for membership to ETTAC, which consists of approximately 35 members appointed by the Secretary, in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidance and based on their ability to carry out the objectives of the Committee. Members represent U.S. exporters of environmental technologies, products and services; reflect the diversity of this sector, including in terms of company size and geographic location; and are drawn from U.S. environmental technologies manufacturing and services companies, U.S. trade associations, and U.S. private sector organizations involved in the promotion of exports of environmental technologies, products and services. Membership in a committee operating under the Federal Advisory Committee Act must be balanced in terms of economic subsector, geographic location, and company size. Committee SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 members serve in a representative capacity and must be able to generally represent the views and interests of a certain subsector of the U.S. environmental industry; they are, therefore, not Special Government Employees. Each member of the Committee must be a U.S. citizen, and not registered as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. No member may represent a company that is majorityowned or controlled by a foreign government entity or foreign government entities. Companies must be at least 51 percent owned by U.S. persons. Candidates should be senior executive-level representatives from environmental technology companies, trade associations, and U.S. privatesector organizations involved in the promotion of exports of environmental technologies, products and services. Members of the ETTAC should have experience in the exportation of one or more environmental technologies, goods and/or services, including: (1) Air pollution control and monitoring technologies; (2) Analytic devices and services; (3) Environmental engineering and consulting services; (4) Financial services relevant to the environmental sector; (5) Process and pollution prevention technologies; (6) Solid and hazardous waste management technologies; and/or (7) Water and wastewater treatment technologies. The Secretary will appoint at least one individual representing each of the following: a. Environmental businesses, including small businesses; b. Trade associations in the environmental sector; c. Private sector organizations involved in the promotion of environmental exports, including products that comply with U.S. environmental, safety, and related requirements; d. States (as defined in 15 U.S.C. 4721(j)(5)) and associations representing the States; and e. Other appropriate interested members of the public, including labor representatives. Nominees will be evaluated based upon their ability to carry out the objectives of the Committee. ETTAC’s current Charter is available at https:// www.environment.ita.doc.gov under the tab: Advisory Committee. Appointments will be made to create a balanced Committee in terms of subsector representation, product lines, firm size, geographic area, and other criteria. E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64170-64172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-502]


Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On April 24, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes 
from Thailand.\1\ This review covers two producers and/or exporters of 
the subject merchandise, Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd. 
(Saha Thai), and Pacific Pipe Company Limited (Pacific Pipe). The 
period of review (POR) is March 1, 2012, through February 28, 2013. The 
Department received comments from interested parties. For the final 
results, we find that Saha Thai has not sold subject merchandise at 
less than normal value (NV), and we continue to find that Pacific Pipe 
had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 
Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 22794 (April 24, 2014) (Preliminary 
Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: October 28, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Rhoads, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0123.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On April 24, 2014, the Department published, and invited interested 
parties to comment on, the Preliminary Results. Saha Thai and Wheatland 
Tube Company submitted case briefs on June 16, 2014, and submitted 
rebuttal briefs on June 23, 2014.

[[Page 64171]]

    The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance 
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping order are certain circular 
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand.\2\ The subject 
merchandise has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not 
exceeding 16 inches. The merchandise is classifiable under the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 
7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 
7306.30.5085 and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and purposes of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP), the written description of the merchandise subject to 
the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order 
is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 
adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded Carbon 
Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: 2012-2013 Administrative 
Review,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum), for a complete description of the scope of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    For the final results of this review, we continue to find that 
Pacific Pipe had no shipments during the POR.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list 
of issues that parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 
IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record as well as comments received from 
parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made two revisions to 
Saha Thai's margin calculation for the final results. We (1) used Saha 
Thai's most up-to-date cost of production file, and (2) adjusted Saha 
Thai's duty drawback amount so that the amount added to export price is 
consistent with the amount added to Saha Thai's calculated cost of 
production.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Saha Thai's Final Analysis Memorandum and Memorandum to 
the File, entitled ``Final Results of the Administrative Review of 
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Analysis 
Memorandum for Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    As a result of our review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period March 1, 2011, through 
February 29, 2012.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                  Producer/exporter                     dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd..........                0.00
Pacific Pipe Company Limited........................                 (*)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No shipments or sales subject to this review. The firm has an
  individual rate from the last segment of the proceeding in which the
  firm had shipments or sales.

Assessment Rates

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2) and the Final Modification 
for Reviews,\5\ the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate 
appropriate entries for Saha Thai without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003.\6\ This clarification applies to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by Saha Thai for which it did not 
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the Assessment Policy Notice, because we continue 
to find that Pacific Pipe had no shipments of subject merchandise to 
the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all applicable 
entries of merchandise produced by Pacific Pipe and exported by other 
parties at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at 
the all-others rate.
    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from 
Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the 
Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Saha Thai will be 0.00 percent, the 
weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of 
this administrative review; (2) for Pacific Pipe and previously 
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the 
most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less than 
fair value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 
merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 
firm covered in this or any previous review or the LTFV investigation, 
then the cash deposit rate will be the ``all-others'' rate of 15.67 
percent established in the LTFV investigation.\7\ These deposit rates, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Carbon Steel 
Pipes and Tubes From Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notifications

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could

[[Page 64172]]

result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of 
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: October 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: The Department Inadvertently Used the Incorrect Section D 
Cost File in the Preliminary Results Calculations
Comment 2: For Transactions with Sale Dates Prior to the POR, the 
Department Should Use the Corresponding Costs from the Prior POR
Comment 3: The Department Should Revise Saha Thai's Reported Costs 
To Exclude the Grade B Adjustments
Comment 4: Calculation of Saha Thai's Freight Revenue Cap
Comment 5: Withdrawal of the Regulatory Provisions Governing 
Targeted Dumping in Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
Comment 6: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Methodology in 
Administrative Reviews
Comment 7: Differential Pricing
Comment 8: Calculation of Saha Thai's Duty Drawback Adjustment
Comment 9: Application of Adverse Facts Available to Affiliated 
Party Transactions Discovered at Verification

[FR Doc. 2014-25611 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.