Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of No Objection to Advance Notice Filing, as Amended by Amendment No. 1, Concerning the Government Security Division's Inclusion of GCF Repo® Positions in Its Intraday Participant Clearing Fund Requirement Calculation, and Its Hourly Internal Surveillance Cycles, 63458-63461 [2014-25202]
Download as PDF
63458
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
intraday CFR could be unduly reduced.
The EUIC for Early Unwinds will only
apply to the reverse repo side (cash
lender) since it is only the reverse side
whose lockup is unwound early. The
securities subject to the Early Unwind
are not returned to the repo side (cash
borrower) in connection with Early
Unwinds. Early Unwinds are performed
on the reverse repo side to ensure that
the underlying collateral is available to
the repo side at its settlement bank. As
such, the reverse repo side is subject to
the EUIC notwithstanding its inability to
control the Early Unwind as their noon
intraday CFR could be unduly reduced
as a result of such Early Unwinds. GSD
has discussed the EUIC with the
participants that are likely to be
materially impacted by this proposed
charge. These participants did not
express any concerns about the EUIC.
There is no automatic unwind (return
of securities) to the repo side. If the repo
side needs its securities before the 3:30
p.m. (ET) scheduled unwind, it may
perform a securities-for-securities
substitution or a cash-for-securities
substitution (in which case it may be
subject to the EUIC).
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 14
directs the Commission to approve a
self-regulatory organization’s proposed
rule change if the Commission finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 15 requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency are designed to assure
the safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change to establish the
EUIC to protect against the exposure
that may result from intraday Cash
Substitutions and Early Unwinds in
connection with FICC’s proposal to
include the underlying collateral
pertaining to the GCF Repo® positions
in GSD’s noon intraday participant CFR
calculation and hourly internal
surveillance cycles is consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.16
Although the inclusion of GCF Repo®
positions into intraday participant CFR
calculations and hourly surveillance
cycles may better reflect the actual risk
in its members’ portfolios, the inclusion
of the EUIC may allow FICC to use even
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
16 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
15 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Oct 22, 2014
Jkt 235001
more accurate and current position
information in its margin calculations
and mitigate the effects of Cash
Substitutions and Early Unwinds that
occur during the intraday period. This
more accurate margin calculation may
allow FICC to better safeguard and
secure securities and funds which are in
its custody or control or for which it is
responsible.
The proposed change is also
consistent with Rule 17Ad–22 17 of the
Clearing Agency Standards which
establishes the minimum requirements
regarding how registered clearing
agencies must maintain effective risk
management procedures and controls.
Specifically, Rule 17Ad–22(b)(1)
requires a clearing agency that performs
CCP services to establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies
reasonably designed to measure its
credit exposures at least daily and to
limit exposures to potential losses from
defaults by participants under normal
market conditions so that the operations
of the clearing agency should not be
disrupt and non-defaulting participants
would not be exposed to losses that they
cannot anticipate or control.18 Rule
17Ad–22(b)(2) requires FICC to
establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to use margin
requirements to limit its credit
exposures to participants under normal
market conditions and use risk-based
models and parameters to set margin
requirements.19 To these ends, the
change may provide FICC with a more
accurate measurement of daily credit
exposure using a risk-based model and
is designed to address exposures that
may occur from intraday activity. In
sum, FICC’s more accurate and timely
calculations around and monitoring of
GCF Repo® activity should better enable
FICC to respond in the event that a
member defaults.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission concludes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, particularly the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act,20 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,21 that the
17 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22.
CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(1).
19 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2).
20 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
21 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
22 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 17
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FICC–2014–01) be and hereby is
approved.22
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–25207 Filed 10–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73388; File No. SR–FICC–
2014–801]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of No Objection to Advance
Notice Filing, as Amended by
Amendment No. 1, Concerning the
Government Security Division’s
Inclusion of GCF Repo® Positions in
Its Intraday Participant Clearing Fund
Requirement Calculation, and Its
Hourly Internal Surveillance Cycles
October 17, 2014.
On January 10, 2014, The Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) advance
notice SR–FICC–2014–801 (‘‘Advance
Notice’’) pursuant to Section
806(e)(1)(A) of the Payment, Clearing,
and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010
(‘‘Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Supervision Act’’ or ‘‘Title VIII’’) 1 and
Rule 19b–4(n)(1)(i) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).2 The
Advance Notice was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
February 10, 2014.3 On March 10, 2014,
the Commission staff sent FICC a letter,
pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(D) 4 and
Commission authorization, requesting
additional information regarding this
advance notice.5 FICC filed an
amendment to the Advance Notice on
August 11, 2014, which was published
23 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(A). The Financial Stability
Oversight Council designated FICC a systemically
important financial market utility on July 18, 2012.
See Financial Stability Oversight Council 2012
Annual Report, Appendix A, https://
www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/Documents/
2012%20Annual%20Report.pdf. Therefore, FICC is
required to comply with Title VIII of the Payment,
Clearing and Settlement Supervision Act.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i).
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71469 (Feb.
4, 2014), 79 FR 7722 (Feb. 10, 2014) (SR–FICC–
2014–801).
4 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(D).
5 The Commission received a response to this
request for additional information August 19, 2014,
at which time a 60 day review period for the
Advance Notice began pursuant to Section
806(e)(1)(G). 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(G).
1 12
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 2014 / Notices
for comment in the Federal Register on
September, 26, 2014.6 The Commission
received no comments on the Advance
Notice. This publication serves as a
notice of no objection to the changes
proposed in the Advance Notice.
I. Description of the Advance Notice
The Advance Notice concerns a
proposal by FICC’s Government
Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) to include
GCF Repo® 7 positions in its intraday
(i.e., noon) participant Clearing Fund
requirement calculation (‘‘CFR’’), and its
hourly internal surveillance cycles.
FICC intends for this enhancement to
align GSD’s risk management
calculations and monitoring with the
changes that have been implemented to
the tri-party infrastructure by the TriParty Repo Infrastructure Reform Task
Force (‘‘Task Force’’) 8 specifically, with
respect to locking up of GCF Repo®
collateral until 3:30 p.m. (ET) rather
than 7:30 a.m. (ET). The Advance Notice
also provides FICC the ability to account
for an altered intraday risk profile of
members as a result of a member’s
substitution of cash for securities that
were used as collateral for a GCF Repo®
position the prior day (‘‘Cash
Substitution’’) or a clearing bank
unwind of the cash lending side of the
transaction for an inter-bank GCF Repo®
transaction at 7:30 a.m. (ET) (‘‘Early
Unwind’’) by implementing an Early
Unwind Intraday Charge (‘‘EUIC’’)
where appropriate.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(i) Historical Background
Prior to the changes implemented by
the Task Force, the underlying collateral
pertaining to the GCF Repo® positions
was locked up each afternoon
(approximately 4:30 p.m. (ET)) and
unwound at the beginning of the next
business day (approximately 7:30 a.m.
(ET)). Thus, the GCF Repo® positions
were included in the end of day
(‘‘EOD’’) CFR calculations but not
included in FICC’s noon intraday CFR
calculations. Because the GCF Repo®
6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73187
(September 23), 79 FR 58007 (September 26, 2014)
(SR–FICC–2014–801).
7 The GCF Repo® service enables dealers to trade
general collateral repos, based on rate, term, and
underlying product, throughout the day without
requiring intra-day, trade-for-trade settlement on a
Deliver-versus-Payment (‘‘DVP’’) basis. The service
fosters a highly liquid market for securities
financing.
8 The Task Force was formed in September 2009
under the auspices of the Payments Risk
Committee, a private-sector body sponsored by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Task
Force’s goal is to enhance the repo market’s ability
to navigate stressed market conditions by
implementing changes that help better safeguard
the market. FICC has worked in close collaboration
with the Task Force on its reform initiatives.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Oct 22, 2014
Jkt 235001
positions were not included in FICC’s
noon intraday CFR calculation, the noon
calculation could result in an undermargined condition relative to the same
EOD 9 CFR. Thus, FICC imposed a
‘‘higher-of’’ standard on GCF Repo®
participants, whereby their noon
intraday CFR was the higher of the
actual noon intraday CFR calculation or
its prior EOD CFR calculation.10
With the advent of the Task Force’s
reform, which resulted in moving the
unwind from 7:30 a.m. (ET) to 3:30 p.m.
(ET), details on the underlying collateral
pertaining to GCF Repo® positions are
now received from the clearing banks on
an hourly basis and can be incorporated
into the noon intraday CFR calculation.
Substitutions of underlying collateral
are now permitted between 8:30 a.m.
(ET) and 3:30 p.m. (ET).11
(ii) Proposed Change
Because GCF Repo® collateral
remains locked-up until 3:30 p.m. (ET),
FICC proposed incorporating the
underlying collateral pertaining to GCF
Repo® positions in its noon intraday
participant CFR calculation, and its
hourly internal surveillance cycles.12
This enhancement is intended to align
FICC’s risk management calculations
and monitoring with the changes that
have been implemented to the tri-party
infrastructure by the Task Force.
In certain instances, Cash
Substitutions, for repo and reverse repo
9 As used herein ‘‘prior EOD’’ refers to the end of
day cycle immediately preceding the current noon
intraday cycle and ‘‘same EOD’’ refers to the cycle
immediately subsequent to the current noon
intraday cycle.
10 For example, in the extreme case where a
participant’s portfolio was comprised entirely of
GCF Repo® positions, at each EOD margining cycle
FICC could calculate a substantial margin
requirement which had to be met by 9:30 a.m. (ET)
the next morning. But at each intraday margining
cycle, FICC would calculate a negligible margin
requirement (because GCF Repo® positions were
not included at intraday). This would allow the
participant to withdraw substantially all its margin
collateral before the same EOD. In this case, if the
participant defaulted overnight, FICC would hold
almost no margin collateral from the participant
while having the exposure of liquidating losses on
a substantial GCF Repo® portfolio. To prevent this
potential under-margin condition, FICC imposed
the ‘‘higher of’’ standard.
11 A key aspect of the GCF Repo® service is to
give the repo side (cash borrower) the ability to
retrieve its securities during the business day and
deliver those securities to meet a delivery
obligation. As a result, GCF Repo® was unwound
in the morning. With the Tri-Party Reform’s change
in the unwind from 7:30 a.m. (ET) to 3:30 p.m. (ET),
participants now have access to their securities
during the day via collateral substitutions.
12 In the ordinary course of business, the ‘‘higher
of’’ standard will not apply. However, this standard
will remain available in the event that one or both
clearing banks do not provide intraday underlying
collateral pertaining to the GCF Repo® position data
because such clearing bank, as applicable, is unable
to provide the data.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63459
positions and the Early Unwind of
interbank allocations for reverse repo
positions, could result in higher cash
balances in the underlying collateral
pertaining to GCF Repo® positions at
noon intraday than the same EOD, and
could present a potential under-margin
condition because cash collateral is not
margined but the cash likely will be
replaced by securities in the next GCF
Repo® allocation of collateral. The
under-margin condition will exist
overnight because the VaR on the GCF
Repo® collateral in the same EOD cycle
will not be calculated until after
Fedwire is closed, thus precluding
members from satisfying margin deficits
until the morning of the next business
day.
As a result, FICC amended its
proposal 13 to include the EUIC to
account for the altered intraday risk
profile created by Cash Substitutions
and Early Unwinds.14 In order to
determine whether an EUIC should be
applied, FICC will take the following
steps:
1. At noon, FICC will compare the
prior EOD VaR component of the CFR
calculation with the current day’s noon
intraday VaR component of the CFR
calculation.
2. If the current day’s noon intraday
VaR calculation is equal to or higher
than the prior EOD’s VaR calculation
then GSD will not apply an EUIC. If
however, the current day’s noon
calculation is lower, then FICC will
proceed to the step 3 below.
3. FICC will review the GCF Repo®
participant’s DVP and GCF Repo®
portfolio to determine whether the
reduction in the noon calculation may
be attributable to the GCF Repo®
participant’s intraday cash substitutions
or early unwind of interbank
allocations. If so, then FICC will apply
the EUIC.
4. At the participant level, the EUIC 15
will be the lesser of (i) the net VaR
decrease that may be deemed to be
attributable to either Cash Substitutions
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73187
(September 23), 79 FR 58007 (September 26, 2014)
(SR–FICC–2014–801).
14 If a member is assessed an EUIC that is deemed
unnecessary, FICC management will have the
discretion to waive such charge.
15 The EUIC will be included in the noon intraday
participant CFR, but not the same EOD CFR. This
is because the risk associated with cash lockups
exists at intraday, that is, at any time before at EOD.
At EOD in the normal course of business, GCF
Repo® positions consist of 100% eligible non-cash
securities. GCF Repo® is used for overnight
financing of securities inventory. Absent
extraordinary circumstances, participants do not
use cash to collateralized overnight cash loans.
Cash Substitutions occur at intraday as participants
substitute in cash to withdraw securities they need
for intraday deliveries.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
63460
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 2014 / Notices
and/or Early Unwinds of interbank
allocations or (ii) the prior EOD VaR
minus the noon intraday VaR.16
The EUIC for Cash Substitutions will
apply to both the repo side (cash
borrower) and the reverse repo side
(cash lender) of the transaction and the
EUIC for the Early Unwinds of interbank
allocations will apply to the reverse
repo side only. The EUIC applies to the
reverse repo side because although that
side does not initiate the Cash
Substitution or the Early Unwind of
interbank allocations, these events
change the reverse repo participants’
risk profile and as a result, their noon
intraday CFR could be unduly reduced.
The EUIC for the Early Unwind of
interbank allocations will only apply to
the reverse repo side (cash lender) since
it is only the reverse side whose lockup
is unwound early. The securities subject
to the Early unwind are not returned to
the repo side (cash borrower) in
connection with the early unwind of
interbank allocations. The Early
Unwind of interbank allocations is
performed on the reverse repo side to
ensure that the underlying collateral is
available to the repo side at its
settlement bank. Cash is returned to the
reverse repo side and thus unwound
early. There is no automatic unwind
(return of securities) to the repo side. If
the repo side needs its securities before
the 3:30 p.m. (ET) scheduled unwind, it
may perform a securities-for-securities
substitution or a cash-for-securities
substitution (in which case it may be
subject to the EUIC).
II. Discussion and Commission
Findings
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Although the Payment, Clearing and
Settlement Supervision Act does not
specify a standard of review for an
advance notice, the Commission
believes its stated purpose is
instructive.17 The stated purpose is to
mitigate systemic risk in the financial
system and promote financial stability
by, among other things, promoting
uniform risk management standards for
systemically-important financial market
utilities (‘‘FMU’’) and strengthening the
16 In the event that cash substitutions or early
unwind of interbank allocations impacts the CFR,
the prior end of day CFR is used as a proxy for the
same end of day CFR for the portion of the portfolio
that is impacted by such cash substitutions or early
unwind of interbank allocations. The EUIC is
designed to prevent the impact of cash substitutions
and early unwind of interbank allocations from
unduly reducing noon intraday CFR relative to the
prior EOD CFR calculation, thus the EUIC will not
increase the noon intraday CFR above the prior
EOD CFR calculation. (But the noon intraday CFR
calculation exclusive of EUIC could be higher than
the prior EOD CFR calculation.)
17 See 12 U.S.C. 5461(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Oct 22, 2014
Jkt 235001
liquidity of systemically important
FMUs.18
Section 805(a)(2) of the Payment,
Clearing, and Settlement Supervision
Act 19 authorizes the Commission to
prescribe risk management standards for
the payment, clearing, and settlement
activities of designated clearing entities
and financial institutions engaged in
designated activities for which it is the
supervisory agency or the appropriate
financial regulator. Section 805(b) of the
Payment, Clearing, and Settlement
Supervision Act 20 states that the
objectives and principles for the risk
management standards prescribed under
Section 805(a) shall be to:
• Promote robust risk management;
• promote safety and soundness;
• reduce systemic risks; and
• support the stability of the broader
financial system.
The Commission has adopted risk
management standards under Section
805(a)(2) of the Payment, Clearing and
Settlement Supervision Act 21
(‘‘Clearing Agency Standards’’).22 The
Clearing Agency Standards became
effective on January 2, 2013 and require
registered clearing agencies that perform
central counterparty (‘‘CCP’’) services to
establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
that are reasonably designed to meet
certain minimum requirements for their
operations and risk management
practices on an ongoing basis.23 As
such, it is appropriate for the
Commission to review advance notices
against these Clearing Agency Standards
and the objectives and principles of
these risk management standards as
described in Section 805(b) of the
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Supervision Act.24
Because it was based on the previous
pre-reform unwinding process described
above, FICC’s intraday risk calculation
does not currently capture the GCF
Repo® positions on an intraday basis.
The change to incorporate the
underlying collateral pertaining to the
18 Id.
19 12
U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
U.S.C. 5464(b).
21 12 U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
22 Rule 17Ad–22, 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22. Exchange
Act Release No. 68080 (October 22, 2012), 77 FR
66220 (November 2, 2012) (S7–08–11).
23 The Clearing Agency Standards are
substantially similar to the risk management
standards established by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (‘‘Federal Reserve’’)
governing the operations of designated DFMUs that
are not clearing entities and financial institutions
engaged in designated activities for which the
Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission is the Supervisory Agency. See
Financial Market Utilities, 77 FR 45907 (August 2,
2012).
24 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
20 12
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GCF Repo® positions in its noon
intraday participant CFR calculation,
and its hourly internal surveillance
cycles, should improve FICC’s risk
management by providing a more
accurate and timely view of member
positions and their corresponding
exposures and may help ensure that
FICC collects sufficient clearing fund
deposits to safeguard itself in the event
of a member default. Further,
incorporating GCF Repo® positions into
intraday participant CFR calculations
and hourly surveillance cycles may
better reflect the actual risk in its
members’ portfolios. Moreover, the
inclusion of the EUIC may allow FICC
to use more accurate position
information in its margin calculations
and mitigate the effects of Cash
Substitutions and Early Unwinds that
occur during the intraday period.
The Commission believes that
including GCF Repo® positions in
FICC’s intraday participant clearing
fund calculations and hourly internal
surveillance meets the objectives and
principles for the risk management
standards prescribed under Section
805(a). The inclusion of GCF® Repo
positions may provide FICC with a more
accurate view of members’ intraday
exposures and more accurate risk
profiles. Additionally, the EUIC allows
FICC to account for risks posed by
intraday VaR fluctuations that are
caused by Cash Substitutions and Early
Unwinds and may allow FICC to better
manage intraday risk. Thus, the
proposal promotes robust risk
management and safety and soundness
of FICC’s risk management systems,
reduces systemic risk, and supports the
stability of the broader financial
system.25
The proposed change is also
consistent with Rule 17Ad–22 26 of the
Clearing Agency Standards which
establishes the minimum requirements
regarding how registered clearing
agencies must maintain effective risk
management procedures and controls.
Specifically, Rule 17Ad–22(b)(1)
requires a clearing agency that performs
CCP services to establish, implement,
maintain and enforce written policies
reasonably designed to measure its
credit exposures at least daily and to
limit exposures to potential losses from
defaults by participants under normal
market conditions so that the operations
of the clearing agency should not be
disrupt and non-defaulting participants
would not be exposed to losses that they
cannot anticipate or control.27 Rule
25 12
U.S.C. 5464(b).
CFR 240.17Ad–22.
27 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(1).
26 17
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 205 / Thursday, October 23, 2014 / Notices
17Ad–22(b)(2) requires FICC to
establish, implement, maintain and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to use margin
requirements to limit its credit
exposures to participants under normal
market conditions and use risk-based
models and parameters to set margin
requirements.28 To these ends, the
change may provide FICC with a more
accurate measurement of daily credit
exposure using a risk-based model and
is designed to address exposures that
may occur from intraday activity. In
sum, FICC’s more accurate and timely
calculations around and monitoring of
GCF Repo® activity may better enable
FICC to respond in the event that a
member defaults.
III. Conclusion
It is therefore noticed, pursuant to
Section 806(e)(1)(I) of the Payment,
Clearing and Settlement Supervision
Act,29 that the Commission does not
object to advance notice proposal (SR–
FICC2014–801) and that FICC is
authorized to implement the proposal as
of the date of this notice or the date of
an order by the Commission approving
a proposed rule change that reflects rule
changes that are consistent with this
advance notice proposal (SR–FICC–
2014–01), whichever is later.
By the Commission.
Kevin O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–25202 Filed 10–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 8919]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Individual, Corporate or
Foundation, and Government Donor
Letter Applications
Notice of request for public
comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
ACTION:
The Department of State has
submitted the information collection
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we
are requesting comments on this
collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The
purpose of this Notice is to allow 30
days for public comment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
28 17
29 12
CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2).
U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(I).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Oct 22, 2014
Jkt 235001
Submit comments directly to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) up to November 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Email: oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov. You must include the DS
form number, information collection
title, and the OMB control number in
the subject line of your message.
• Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk
Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed collection
instrument and supporting documents,
to Ronda Harvey, who may be reached
on (202) 647–6009 or at HarveyRJ2@
state.gov.
DATE(S):
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Title of Information Collection:
Individual, Corporate or Foundation
and Government Donor Letter
Application.
• OMB Control Number: None.
• Type of Request: Collection in use
without an OMB control number.
• Originating Office: Office of
Emergencies in the Diplomatic and
Consular Service (EDCS).
• Form Numbers: Donor Form—
Individual (DS–4273), Donor Form—
Corporate or Foundation (DS–4272),
Donor Form—Government (DS–4271).
• Respondents: Individuals,
corporations, or foundations that make
donations to the Department.
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
3665.
• Estimated Number of Responses:
3665.
• Average Time per Response: 5
minutes per form.
• Total Estimated Burden Time: 305
hours.
• Frequency: On occasion.
• Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the time and cost burden for
this proposed collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63461
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Please note that comments submitted
in response to this Notice are public
record. Before including any detailed
personal information, you should be
aware that your comments as submitted,
including your personal information,
will be available for public review.
Abstract of proposed collection:
The Office of Emergencies in the
Diplomatic and Consular Service
(EDCS) manages the solicitation and
acceptance of gifts to the U.S.
Department of State. The information
requested via donor letters is a
necessary first step to accepting
donations. The information is sought
pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2697, 5 U.S.C.
7324 and 22 CFR Part 3) and will be
used by EDCS’s Gift Fund Coordinator
to demonstrate the donor’s intention to
donate either an in-kind or monetary
gift to the Department. This information
is mandatory and must be completed
before the gift is received by the
Department.
Methodology:
The information collection forms will
be available electronically via the State
Department’s Internet Web site (https://
eforms.state.gov). Donors can also
complete hard-copies of the form and
mail them to EDCS if internet access is
not available.
Dated: October 14, 2014.
Frances Gidez,
Gift Funds Coordinator, M/EDCS, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2014–25263 Filed 10–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 8930]
Overseas Security Advisory Council
(Osac) Renewal
The Department of State has renewed
the Charter of the Overseas Security
Advisory Council. This federal advisory
committee will continue to interact on
overseas security matters of mutual
interest between the U.S. Government
and the American private sector. The
Council’s initiatives and security
publications provide a unique
contribution to protecting American
private sector interests abroad. The
Under Secretary for Management
determined that renewal of the Charter
is necessary and in the public interest.
The Council consists of
representatives from three (3) U.S.
Government agencies and thirty-one
(31) American private sector companies
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63458-63461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25202]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73388; File No. SR-FICC-2014-801]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Fixed Income Clearing
Corporation; Notice of No Objection to Advance Notice Filing, as
Amended by Amendment No. 1, Concerning the Government Security
Division's Inclusion of GCF Repo[supreg] Positions in Its Intraday
Participant Clearing Fund Requirement Calculation, and Its Hourly
Internal Surveillance Cycles
October 17, 2014.
On January 10, 2014, The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
(``FICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') advance notice SR-FICC-2014-801 (``Advance Notice'')
pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(A) of the Payment, Clearing, and
Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 (``Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Supervision Act'' or ``Title VIII'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4(n)(1)(i) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\2\ The Advance Notice was
published for comment in the Federal Register on February 10, 2014.\3\
On March 10, 2014, the Commission staff sent FICC a letter, pursuant to
Section 806(e)(1)(D) \4\ and Commission authorization, requesting
additional information regarding this advance notice.\5\ FICC filed an
amendment to the Advance Notice on August 11, 2014, which was published
[[Page 63459]]
for comment in the Federal Register on September, 26, 2014.\6\ The
Commission received no comments on the Advance Notice. This publication
serves as a notice of no objection to the changes proposed in the
Advance Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(A). The Financial Stability Oversight
Council designated FICC a systemically important financial market
utility on July 18, 2012. See Financial Stability Oversight Council
2012 Annual Report, Appendix A, https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/Documents/2012%20Annual%20Report.pdf. Therefore, FICC is
required to comply with Title VIII of the Payment, Clearing and
Settlement Supervision Act.
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(n)(1)(i).
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71469 (Feb. 4, 2014), 79
FR 7722 (Feb. 10, 2014) (SR-FICC-2014-801).
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(D).
\5\ The Commission received a response to this request for
additional information August 19, 2014, at which time a 60 day
review period for the Advance Notice began pursuant to Section
806(e)(1)(G). 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(G).
\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73187 (September 23), 79
FR 58007 (September 26, 2014) (SR-FICC-2014-801).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Description of the Advance Notice
The Advance Notice concerns a proposal by FICC's Government
Securities Division (``GSD'') to include GCF Repo[supreg] \7\ positions
in its intraday (i.e., noon) participant Clearing Fund requirement
calculation (``CFR''), and its hourly internal surveillance cycles.
FICC intends for this enhancement to align GSD's risk management
calculations and monitoring with the changes that have been implemented
to the tri-party infrastructure by the Tri-Party Repo Infrastructure
Reform Task Force (``Task Force'') \8\ specifically, with respect to
locking up of GCF Repo[supreg] collateral until 3:30 p.m. (ET) rather
than 7:30 a.m. (ET). The Advance Notice also provides FICC the ability
to account for an altered intraday risk profile of members as a result
of a member's substitution of cash for securities that were used as
collateral for a GCF Repo[supreg] position the prior day (``Cash
Substitution'') or a clearing bank unwind of the cash lending side of
the transaction for an inter-bank GCF Repo[supreg] transaction at 7:30
a.m. (ET) (``Early Unwind'') by implementing an Early Unwind Intraday
Charge (``EUIC'') where appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The GCF Repo[supreg] service enables dealers to trade
general collateral repos, based on rate, term, and underlying
product, throughout the day without requiring intra-day, trade-for-
trade settlement on a Deliver-versus-Payment (``DVP'') basis. The
service fosters a highly liquid market for securities financing.
\8\ The Task Force was formed in September 2009 under the
auspices of the Payments Risk Committee, a private-sector body
sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Task Force's
goal is to enhance the repo market's ability to navigate stressed
market conditions by implementing changes that help better safeguard
the market. FICC has worked in close collaboration with the Task
Force on its reform initiatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Historical Background
Prior to the changes implemented by the Task Force, the underlying
collateral pertaining to the GCF Repo[supreg] positions was locked up
each afternoon (approximately 4:30 p.m. (ET)) and unwound at the
beginning of the next business day (approximately 7:30 a.m. (ET)).
Thus, the GCF Repo[supreg] positions were included in the end of day
(``EOD'') CFR calculations but not included in FICC's noon intraday CFR
calculations. Because the GCF Repo[supreg] positions were not included
in FICC's noon intraday CFR calculation, the noon calculation could
result in an under-margined condition relative to the same EOD \9\ CFR.
Thus, FICC imposed a ``higher-of'' standard on GCF Repo[supreg]
participants, whereby their noon intraday CFR was the higher of the
actual noon intraday CFR calculation or its prior EOD CFR
calculation.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As used herein ``prior EOD'' refers to the end of day cycle
immediately preceding the current noon intraday cycle and ``same
EOD'' refers to the cycle immediately subsequent to the current noon
intraday cycle.
\10\ For example, in the extreme case where a participant's
portfolio was comprised entirely of GCF Repo[supreg] positions, at
each EOD margining cycle FICC could calculate a substantial margin
requirement which had to be met by 9:30 a.m. (ET) the next morning.
But at each intraday margining cycle, FICC would calculate a
negligible margin requirement (because GCF Repo[supreg] positions
were not included at intraday). This would allow the participant to
withdraw substantially all its margin collateral before the same
EOD. In this case, if the participant defaulted overnight, FICC
would hold almost no margin collateral from the participant while
having the exposure of liquidating losses on a substantial GCF
Repo[supreg] portfolio. To prevent this potential under-margin
condition, FICC imposed the ``higher of'' standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the advent of the Task Force's reform, which resulted in
moving the unwind from 7:30 a.m. (ET) to 3:30 p.m. (ET), details on the
underlying collateral pertaining to GCF Repo[supreg] positions are now
received from the clearing banks on an hourly basis and can be
incorporated into the noon intraday CFR calculation. Substitutions of
underlying collateral are now permitted between 8:30 a.m. (ET) and 3:30
p.m. (ET).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ A key aspect of the GCF Repo[supreg] service is to give the
repo side (cash borrower) the ability to retrieve its securities
during the business day and deliver those securities to meet a
delivery obligation. As a result, GCF Repo[supreg] was unwound in
the morning. With the Tri-Party Reform's change in the unwind from
7:30 a.m. (ET) to 3:30 p.m. (ET), participants now have access to
their securities during the day via collateral substitutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Proposed Change
Because GCF Repo[supreg] collateral remains locked-up until 3:30
p.m. (ET), FICC proposed incorporating the underlying collateral
pertaining to GCF Repo[supreg] positions in its noon intraday
participant CFR calculation, and its hourly internal surveillance
cycles.\12\ This enhancement is intended to align FICC's risk
management calculations and monitoring with the changes that have been
implemented to the tri-party infrastructure by the Task Force.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In the ordinary course of business, the ``higher of''
standard will not apply. However, this standard will remain
available in the event that one or both clearing banks do not
provide intraday underlying collateral pertaining to the GCF
Repo[supreg] position data because such clearing bank, as
applicable, is unable to provide the data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In certain instances, Cash Substitutions, for repo and reverse repo
positions and the Early Unwind of interbank allocations for reverse
repo positions, could result in higher cash balances in the underlying
collateral pertaining to GCF Repo[supreg] positions at noon intraday
than the same EOD, and could present a potential under-margin condition
because cash collateral is not margined but the cash likely will be
replaced by securities in the next GCF Repo[supreg] allocation of
collateral. The under-margin condition will exist overnight because the
VaR on the GCF Repo[supreg] collateral in the same EOD cycle will not
be calculated until after Fedwire is closed, thus precluding members
from satisfying margin deficits until the morning of the next business
day.
As a result, FICC amended its proposal \13\ to include the EUIC to
account for the altered intraday risk profile created by Cash
Substitutions and Early Unwinds.\14\ In order to determine whether an
EUIC should be applied, FICC will take the following steps:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73187 (September
23), 79 FR 58007 (September 26, 2014) (SR-FICC-2014-801).
\14\ If a member is assessed an EUIC that is deemed unnecessary,
FICC management will have the discretion to waive such charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. At noon, FICC will compare the prior EOD VaR component of the
CFR calculation with the current day's noon intraday VaR component of
the CFR calculation.
2. If the current day's noon intraday VaR calculation is equal to
or higher than the prior EOD's VaR calculation then GSD will not apply
an EUIC. If however, the current day's noon calculation is lower, then
FICC will proceed to the step 3 below.
3. FICC will review the GCF Repo[supreg] participant's DVP and GCF
Repo[supreg] portfolio to determine whether the reduction in the noon
calculation may be attributable to the GCF Repo[supreg] participant's
intraday cash substitutions or early unwind of interbank allocations.
If so, then FICC will apply the EUIC.
4. At the participant level, the EUIC \15\ will be the lesser of
(i) the net VaR decrease that may be deemed to be attributable to
either Cash Substitutions
[[Page 63460]]
and/or Early Unwinds of interbank allocations or (ii) the prior EOD VaR
minus the noon intraday VaR.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The EUIC will be included in the noon intraday participant
CFR, but not the same EOD CFR. This is because the risk associated
with cash lockups exists at intraday, that is, at any time before at
EOD. At EOD in the normal course of business, GCF Repo[supreg]
positions consist of 100% eligible non-cash securities. GCF
Repo[supreg] is used for overnight financing of securities
inventory. Absent extraordinary circumstances, participants do not
use cash to collateralized overnight cash loans. Cash Substitutions
occur at intraday as participants substitute in cash to withdraw
securities they need for intraday deliveries.
\16\ In the event that cash substitutions or early unwind of
interbank allocations impacts the CFR, the prior end of day CFR is
used as a proxy for the same end of day CFR for the portion of the
portfolio that is impacted by such cash substitutions or early
unwind of interbank allocations. The EUIC is designed to prevent the
impact of cash substitutions and early unwind of interbank
allocations from unduly reducing noon intraday CFR relative to the
prior EOD CFR calculation, thus the EUIC will not increase the noon
intraday CFR above the prior EOD CFR calculation. (But the noon
intraday CFR calculation exclusive of EUIC could be higher than the
prior EOD CFR calculation.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EUIC for Cash Substitutions will apply to both the repo side (cash
borrower) and the reverse repo side (cash lender) of the transaction
and the EUIC for the Early Unwinds of interbank allocations will apply
to the reverse repo side only. The EUIC applies to the reverse repo
side because although that side does not initiate the Cash Substitution
or the Early Unwind of interbank allocations, these events change the
reverse repo participants' risk profile and as a result, their noon
intraday CFR could be unduly reduced. The EUIC for the Early Unwind of
interbank allocations will only apply to the reverse repo side (cash
lender) since it is only the reverse side whose lockup is unwound
early. The securities subject to the Early unwind are not returned to
the repo side (cash borrower) in connection with the early unwind of
interbank allocations. The Early Unwind of interbank allocations is
performed on the reverse repo side to ensure that the underlying
collateral is available to the repo side at its settlement bank. Cash
is returned to the reverse repo side and thus unwound early. There is
no automatic unwind (return of securities) to the repo side. If the
repo side needs its securities before the 3:30 p.m. (ET) scheduled
unwind, it may perform a securities-for-securities substitution or a
cash-for-securities substitution (in which case it may be subject to
the EUIC).
II. Discussion and Commission Findings
Although the Payment, Clearing and Settlement Supervision Act does
not specify a standard of review for an advance notice, the Commission
believes its stated purpose is instructive.\17\ The stated purpose is
to mitigate systemic risk in the financial system and promote financial
stability by, among other things, promoting uniform risk management
standards for systemically-important financial market utilities
(``FMU'') and strengthening the liquidity of systemically important
FMUs.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 12 U.S.C. 5461(b).
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 805(a)(2) of the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement
Supervision Act \19\ authorizes the Commission to prescribe risk
management standards for the payment, clearing, and settlement
activities of designated clearing entities and financial institutions
engaged in designated activities for which it is the supervisory agency
or the appropriate financial regulator. Section 805(b) of the Payment,
Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act \20\ states that the
objectives and principles for the risk management standards prescribed
under Section 805(a) shall be to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
\20\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Promote robust risk management;
promote safety and soundness;
reduce systemic risks; and
support the stability of the broader financial system.
The Commission has adopted risk management standards under Section
805(a)(2) of the Payment, Clearing and Settlement Supervision Act \21\
(``Clearing Agency Standards'').\22\ The Clearing Agency Standards
became effective on January 2, 2013 and require registered clearing
agencies that perform central counterparty (``CCP'') services to
establish, implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and
procedures that are reasonably designed to meet certain minimum
requirements for their operations and risk management practices on an
ongoing basis.\23\ As such, it is appropriate for the Commission to
review advance notices against these Clearing Agency Standards and the
objectives and principles of these risk management standards as
described in Section 805(b) of the Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Supervision Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
\22\ Rule 17Ad-22, 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22. Exchange Act Release No.
68080 (October 22, 2012), 77 FR 66220 (November 2, 2012) (S7-08-11).
\23\ The Clearing Agency Standards are substantially similar to
the risk management standards established by the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System (``Federal Reserve'') governing the
operations of designated DFMUs that are not clearing entities and
financial institutions engaged in designated activities for which
the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is the
Supervisory Agency. See Financial Market Utilities, 77 FR 45907
(August 2, 2012).
\24\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it was based on the previous pre-reform unwinding process
described above, FICC's intraday risk calculation does not currently
capture the GCF Repo[supreg] positions on an intraday basis. The change
to incorporate the underlying collateral pertaining to the GCF
Repo[supreg] positions in its noon intraday participant CFR
calculation, and its hourly internal surveillance cycles, should
improve FICC's risk management by providing a more accurate and timely
view of member positions and their corresponding exposures and may help
ensure that FICC collects sufficient clearing fund deposits to
safeguard itself in the event of a member default. Further,
incorporating GCF Repo[supreg] positions into intraday participant CFR
calculations and hourly surveillance cycles may better reflect the
actual risk in its members' portfolios. Moreover, the inclusion of the
EUIC may allow FICC to use more accurate position information in its
margin calculations and mitigate the effects of Cash Substitutions and
Early Unwinds that occur during the intraday period.
The Commission believes that including GCF Repo[supreg] positions
in FICC's intraday participant clearing fund calculations and hourly
internal surveillance meets the objectives and principles for the risk
management standards prescribed under Section 805(a). The inclusion of
GCF[supreg] Repo positions may provide FICC with a more accurate view
of members' intraday exposures and more accurate risk profiles.
Additionally, the EUIC allows FICC to account for risks posed by
intraday VaR fluctuations that are caused by Cash Substitutions and
Early Unwinds and may allow FICC to better manage intraday risk. Thus,
the proposal promotes robust risk management and safety and soundness
of FICC's risk management systems, reduces systemic risk, and supports
the stability of the broader financial system.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change is also consistent with Rule 17Ad-22 \26\ of
the Clearing Agency Standards which establishes the minimum
requirements regarding how registered clearing agencies must maintain
effective risk management procedures and controls. Specifically, Rule
17Ad-22(b)(1) requires a clearing agency that performs CCP services to
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies reasonably
designed to measure its credit exposures at least daily and to limit
exposures to potential losses from defaults by participants under
normal market conditions so that the operations of the clearing agency
should not be disrupt and non-defaulting participants would not be
exposed to losses that they cannot anticipate or control.\27\ Rule
[[Page 63461]]
17Ad-22(b)(2) requires FICC to establish, implement, maintain and
enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to use
margin requirements to limit its credit exposures to participants under
normal market conditions and use risk-based models and parameters to
set margin requirements.\28\ To these ends, the change may provide FICC
with a more accurate measurement of daily credit exposure using a risk-
based model and is designed to address exposures that may occur from
intraday activity. In sum, FICC's more accurate and timely calculations
around and monitoring of GCF Repo[supreg] activity may better enable
FICC to respond in the event that a member defaults.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\27\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(1).
\28\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
It is therefore noticed, pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(I) of the
Payment, Clearing and Settlement Supervision Act,\29\ that the
Commission does not object to advance notice proposal (SR-FICC2014-801)
and that FICC is authorized to implement the proposal as of the date of
this notice or the date of an order by the Commission approving a
proposed rule change that reflects rule changes that are consistent
with this advance notice proposal (SR-FICC-2014-01), whichever is
later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(I).
By the Commission.
Kevin O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25202 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P