SunAmerica Series Trust, et al.; Notice of Application, 62473-62480 [2014-24684]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone
703/292–8900.
Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on
the impact of its policies, programs and
activities on the CISE community. To
provide advice to the Assistant Director
for CISE on issues related to long-range
planning, and to form ad hoc
subcommittees and working groups to
carry out needed studies and tasks.
Agenda:
Overview and update of CISE budget
and activities
Working group breakout session:
Growing number of students enrolled in
computer science and engineering
courses
Presentation and discussion of the
CISE Committee of Visitors report
Panel discussion on data science
activities
Discussion with NSF Director, Dr.
´
France Cordova
Closing remarks and wrap-up.
Dated: October 10, 2014.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–24691 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2014–67; Order No. 2213]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing concerning a
modification of Global Reseller
Expedited Package Contracts 4
negotiated service agreement. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 21,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
On October 8, 2014, the Postal Service
filed notice that it has agreed to a
Modification to the existing Global
Reseller Expedited Package Contracts 4
negotiated service agreement approved
in this docket.1 In support of its Notice,
the Postal Service includes a redacted
copy of the Modification and a
certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a), as required by 39 CFR
3015.5. Id. Attachments 1 and 2.
The Postal Service also filed the
unredacted Modification and supporting
financial information under seal. The
Postal Service seeks to incorporate by
reference the Application for NonPublic Treatment originally filed in this
docket on August 8, 2014 for the
protection of information that it has
filed under seal. Id. at 1–2.
The Modification replaces Annexes 1
and 2 of the agreement. Annex 1 is
Prices for Priority Mail Express
International and Priority Mail
International Tendered within Specific
3 Digit ZIP Codes. Annex 2 is Prices for
Priority Mail Express International and
Priority Mail International Tendered
from all ZIP Codes other than those
Specified in Annex 1.
The Postal Service intends for the
rates in the Modification to become
effective November 1, 2014. Id. at 1.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission invites comments on
whether the changes presented in the
Postal Service’s Notice are consistent
with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are
due no later than October 21, 2014. The
public portions of these filings can be
accessed via the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Kenneth R.
Moeller to represent the interests of the
general public (Public Representative)
in this docket.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission reopens Docket
No. CP2014–67 for consideration of
matters raised by the Postal Service’s
Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Kenneth R.
Moeller to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this proceeding.
3. Comments are due no later than
October 21, 2014.
Table of Contents
1 Notice of the United States Postal Service of
Filing Modification to Global Reseller Expedited
Package Contracts 4 Contract Negotiated Service
Agreement, October 8, 2014 (Notice).
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62473
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–24693 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–31281; File No. 812–14226]
SunAmerica Series Trust, et al.; Notice
of Application
October 10, 2014.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
‘‘1940 Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’), seeking
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and
Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
thereunder.
AGENCY:
Applicants: SunAmerica Series Trust,
Seasons Series Trust, Anchor Series
Trust, VALIC Company I, and VALIC
Company II (each referred to herein as
a ‘‘Trust,’’ and collectively as the
‘‘Trusts’’), SunAmerica Asset
Management LLC (formerly,
SunAmerica Asset Management Corp.
(‘‘SAAMCo’’), and The Variable Annuity
Life Insurance Company (‘‘VALIC’’)
(together with SAAMCo and the Trusts,
the ‘‘Applicants’’).
Summary of Application: Applicants
request an order granting exemptions
from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and
15(b) of the Act and Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in cases
where a life insurance company
separate account supporting variable life
insurance contracts (‘‘VLI Account’’)
holds shares of an existing portfolio of
a Trust (an ‘‘Existing Fund’’) or a
‘‘Future Fund,’’ 1 as defined below (any
Existing Fund or Future Fund is referred
to herein as a ‘‘Fund’’, and collectively
as the ‘‘Funds’’), and one or more of the
following other types of investors also
hold shares of the Funds: (1) any life
insurance company separate account
supporting variable annuity contracts,
1 As used herein, a ‘‘Future Fund’’ is any
investment company (or investment portfolio or
series thereof), other than an Existing Fund,
designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or VLI
Accounts and to which the Applicants or their
affiliates may in the future serve as investment
advisers, investment subadvisers, investment
managers, administrators, principal underwriters,
or sponsors.
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62474
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
whether or not registered as an
investment company with the
Commission (a ‘‘VA Account’’), (2) any
VLI Account, whether or not registered
as an investment company with the
Commission, (3) the investment adviser
or any subadviser to a Fund or affiliated
persons of the investment adviser or
subadviser (representing seed money
investments in the Fund) (‘‘Advisers’’),
(4) any general account of an insurance
company depositor of VA Accounts
and/or VLI Accounts (representing seed
money investments in the Fund)
(‘‘General Account’’); and/or (5) any
qualified group pension or group
retirement plan administered by a
trustee outside the separate account
context (a ‘‘Plan’’ or ‘‘Qualified Plan’’).
DATES: Filing Date: The application was
filed on October 25, 2013, and amended
and restated on January 30, 2014, and
September 4, 2014.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants
with a copy of the request, personally or
by mail. Hearing requests should be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on November 4, 2014, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants, in the form of an affidavit
or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons may request notification of a
hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants, AIG Life and Retirement c/
o Mark Matthes, Associate General
Counsel, 2919 Allen Parkway, 4th Floor,
Houston, TX 77019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sonny Oh, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M.
Pickholz, Branch Chief, Disclosure
Review Office (Insured Investments),
Division of Investment Management at
(202) 551–6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search.htm, or by calling
(202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. SunAmerica Series Trust was
formed as a Massachusetts business
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
trust on September 11, 1992, and is
registered under the Act as an open-end
management investment company (Reg.
File No. 811–07238). The Trust is a
series investment company as defined
by Rule 18f–2 under the Act and is
currently comprised of forty (40) Funds.
The Trust issues a separate series of
shares of beneficial interest for each of
its Funds and has filed a registration
statement under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the ‘‘1933 Act’’) on
Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 33–52742) to
register such shares. The Trust may
establish additional Funds in the future
and additional classes of shares for such
Funds. Shares of the Funds of the
SunAmerica Series Trust are not and
will not be offered to the general public.
2. Seasons Series Trust was formed as
a Massachusetts business trust on
October 10, 1995, and is registered
under the Act as an open-end
management investment company (Reg.
File No. 811–07725). The Trust is a
series investment company as defined
by Rule 18f–2 under the Act and is
currently comprised of twenty-one (21)
Funds. The Trust issues a separate
series of shares of beneficial interest for
each of its Funds and has filed a
registration statement under the 1933
Act on Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 333–
08653) to register such shares. The Trust
may establish additional Funds in the
future and additional classes of shares
for such Funds. Shares of the Funds of
the Seasons Series Trust are not and
will not be offered to the general public.
3. Anchor Series Trust was formed as
a Massachusetts business trust on
August 26, 1983, and is registered under
the Act as an open-end management
investment company (Reg. File No. 811–
03836). The Trust is a series investment
company as defined by Rule 18f–2
under the Act and is currently
comprised of eight (8) Funds. The Trust
issues a separate series of shares of
beneficial interest for each of its Funds
and has filed a registration statement
under the 1933 Act on Form N–1A (Reg.
File No. 2–86188) to register such
shares. The Trust may establish
additional Funds in the future and
additional classes of shares for such
Funds. Shares of the Funds of the
Anchor Series Trust are not and will not
be offered to the general public.
4. VALIC Company I (‘‘VC I’’) was
formed as a Maryland corporation on
December 7, 1984 and is registered
under the Act as an open-end
management investment company (Reg.
File No. 811–03738). VC I is a series
investment company as defined by Rule
18f–2 under the Act and is currently
comprised of thirty-four (34) separate
Funds. VC I issues a separate series of
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shares for each of its Funds and has
filed a registration statement under the
1933 Act on Form N–1A (Reg. File No.
2–83631) to register such shares. VC I
may establish additional Funds in the
future and additional classes of shares
for such Funds. Shares of the Funds of
VC I are not and will not be offered to
the general public.
5. VALIC Company II (‘‘VC II’’) was
organized as a Delaware statutory trust
on May 6, 1998, and is registered under
the Act as an open-end management
investment company (Reg. File No. 811–
08789). VC II is a series investment
company as defined by Rule 18f–2
under the Act and is currently
comprised of fifteen (15) separate
Funds. VC II issues a separate series of
shares of beneficial interest for each of
its Funds and has filed a registration
statement under the 1933 Act on Form
N–1A (Reg. File No. 333–53589) to
register such shares. VC II may establish
additional Funds in the future and
additional classes of shares for such
Funds. Shares of the Funds of VC II are
not and will not be offered to the
general public.
6. SAAMCo serves as the investment
adviser and manager for all the Funds
of the SunAmerica Series Trust, Seasons
Series Trust, and Anchor Series Trust
and serves as the subadviser to certain
Funds of VC I and VC II. SAAMCo is an
indirectly and wholly owned subsidiary
of American International Group, Inc.
(‘‘AIG’’).
7. VALIC serves as the investment
adviser to VC I and VC II and is a stock
life insurance company originally
organized as The Variable Annuity Life
Insurance Company of America, located
in Washington, DC and re-organized
under the laws of the state of Texas on
August 20, 1968. VALIC is an indirectly
and wholly owned subsidiary of AIG
and is registered as an investment
adviser under the Advisers Act.
8. The Funds propose to offer their
shares to VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts of various life insurance
companies (each a ‘‘Participating
Insurance Company,’’ and collectively,
the ‘‘Participating Insurance
Companies’’) to serve as an investment
medium to support variable life
insurance contracts (‘‘VLI Contracts’’)
and variable annuity contracts (‘‘VA
Contracts’’) (together, ‘‘Variable
Contracts’’) issued through such VLI
and VA Accounts. Each VLI Account
and VA Account is or will be
established as a segregated asset account
by a Participating Insurance Company
pursuant to the insurance law of the
insurance company’s state of domicile.
As such, the assets of each will be the
property of the Participating Insurance
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
Company, and that portion of the assets
of such a VLI or VA Account equal to
the reserves and other contract
liabilities with respect to the VLI or VA
Account will not be chargeable with
liabilities arising out of any other
business that the insurance company
may conduct. The income, gains and
losses, realized or unrealized, from such
a VLI or VA Account’s assets will be
credited to or charged against the VLI or
VA Account without regard to other
income, gains or losses of the
Participating Insurance Company. If a
VLI Account or VA Account is
registered as an investment company, it
will be a ‘‘separate account’’ as defined
by Rule 0–1(e) (or any successor rule)
under the Act and will be registered as
a unit investment trust. For purposes of
the Act, the Participating Insurance
Company that establishes such a
registered VLI Account or VA Account
is the depositor and sponsor of the VLI
or VA Account as those terms have been
interpreted by the Commission with
respect to variable life insurance and
variable annuity separate accounts.
9. The Participating Insurance
Companies are currently American
General Life, The United States Life
Insurance Company in the City of New
York (‘‘USLIC’’), and VALIC. Each
Participating Insurance Company is an
indirect subsidiary of AIG. Various
other life insurance companies that are
not affiliated persons of American
General Life, USLIC, and VALIC may be,
or in the future become, Participating
Insurance Companies. At the current
time, the following VLI Accounts and
VA Accounts of American General Life,
USLIC, and VALIC invest in one or
more of the Trusts: American General
Life: Separate Account 8, Separate
Account 101, Separate Account 102,
Separate Account A, Separate Account
D, Separate Account II, Separate
Account IV, Separate Account VA–2,
Separate Account VL–R, Separate
Account VL–U LIS, Separate Account
VUL, and A.G. Separate Account A;
USLIC: Separate Account USL VA–R,
Separate Account USL VL–R and
Separate Account USL B; and VALIC:
Separate Account A.
10. Each Fund will sell its shares to
VLI Accounts and VA Accounts only if
each Participating Insurance Company
sponsoring such a VLI Account or VA
Account enters into a participation
agreement with the Fund. The
participation agreements define or will
define the relationship between each
Fund and each Participating Insurance
Company and memorialize or will
memorialize, among other matters, the
fact that, except where the agreement
specifically provides otherwise, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
Participating Insurance Company will
remain responsible for establishing and
maintaining any VLI Account or VA
Account covered by the agreement and
for complying with all applicable
requirements of state and federal law
pertaining to such VLI and VA Accounts
and to the sale and distribution of
Variable Contracts issued through such
VLI and VA Accounts. The role of each
Fund under this arrangement, with
regard to the federal securities laws, will
consist of offering and selling shares of
the Fund to the VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts and fulfilling any conditions
that the Commission may impose in
granting the requested order.
11. The use of a common management
investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment
medium for both VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts of the same Participating
Insurance Company, or of two or more
insurance companies that are affiliated
persons of each other, is referred to
herein as ‘‘mixed funding.’’ The use of
a common management investment
company (or investment portfolio
thereof) as an investment medium for
VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of
two or more Participating Insurance
Companies that are not affiliated
persons of each other, is referred to
herein as ‘‘shared funding.’’
12. Applicants propose that each
Fund offer and sell its shares directly to
Plans and assert that Federal tax law
permits investment companies such as
the Funds to increase their net assets by
selling shares to Plans.
13. Plans may invest in shares of an
investment company as the sole
investment under the Plan, or as one of
several investments. Plan participants
may or may not be given an investment
choice depending on the terms of the
Plan itself. The trustees or other
fiduciaries of a Plan may vote
investment company shares held by the
Plan in their own discretion or, if the
applicable Plan so provides, vote such
shares in accordance with instructions
from participants in such Plan.
Applicants have no control over
whether trustees or other fiduciaries of
Plans, rather than participants in the
Plans, have the right to vote under any
particular Plan. Each Plan must be
administered in accordance with the
terms of the Plan and as determined by
its trustee or trustees.
14. Applicants propose that any Fund
may also sell shares to its Adviser. The
Treasury Regulations permit such sales
as long as the return on shares held by
an Adviser is computed in the same
manner as shares held by VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts, the Adviser does not
intend to sell the shares to the public,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62475
and sales to the Adviser are only made
in connection with the creation or
management of the Fund for the
purpose of providing seed money for the
Fund.
15. Applicants propose that any Fund
may also sell shares to a General
Account of a Participating Insurance
Company. The Treasury Regulations
permit such sales as long as the return
on shares held by a General Account is
computed in the same manner as for
shares held by VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts and the Participating
Insurance Company does not intend to
sell the shares to the public.
16. The use of a common management
investment company (or investment
portfolio thereof) as an investment
medium for VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, Plans, Advisers, and General
Accounts is referred to herein as
‘‘extended mixed funding.’’
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act makes it
unlawful for any company to serve as an
investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any investment
company, including a unit investment
trust, if an affiliated person of that
company is subject to disqualification
enumerated in Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of
the Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b)
of the Act have been deemed by the
Commission to require ‘‘pass-through’’
voting with respect to an underlying
investment company’s shares.
2. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) under the Act provide partial
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), and 15(b) of the Act to VLI
Accounts supporting certain VLI
Contracts and to their life insurance
company depositors under limited
circumstances, as described in the
application. Therefore, VLI Accounts,
their depositors and their principal
underwriters may not rely on the
exemptions provided by Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) if shares of
the Fund are held by a VLI Account
through which flexible premium VLI
Contracts are issued, a VLI Account of
an unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Company, a General Account of a
Participating Insurance Company, an
Adviser, any VA Account, or a Plan.
Accordingly, Applicants request an
order of the Commission granting
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), and 15(b) of the Act, and Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
thereunder, to the extent necessary to
permit a scheduled premium VLI
Account to hold shares of Funds when
one or more of the following types of
investors also hold shares of the Funds:
(1) VA Accounts and VLI Accounts
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62476
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
(supporting scheduled premium or
flexible premium VLI Contracts) of
affiliated and unaffiliated Participating
Insurance Companies, (2) General
Accounts, (3) Advisers, or (4) Plans.
3. Applicants maintain that there is
no public policy reason why VLI
Accounts and their Participating
Insurance Company depositors (or
principal underwriters) should not be
able to rely on the exemptions provided
by Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
just because shares of Funds held by the
VLI Accounts are also held by VA
Accounts, other VLI Accounts, an
Adviser, a General Account, or a
Qualified Plan. Rather, Applicants
assert that the proposed sale of Fund
shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers, and
General Accounts may allow for the
development of larger pools of assets,
resulting in the potential for greater
investment and diversification
opportunities and for decreased
expenses at higher asset levels resulting
in greater cost efficiencies. Similarly,
Applicants believe that the proposed
sale of Fund shares to Advisers and
General Accounts of Participating
Insurance Companies for seed money
may result in the creation of more
Funds as investment options for certain
VA Contracts and VLI Contracts than
would otherwise be the case.
4. For the reasons explained below,
Applicants have concluded that
investments by Qualified Plans,
Advisers, and General Accounts in the
Funds should not increase the risk of
material irreconcilable conflicts
between owners of VLI Contracts and
other types of investors or between
owners of VLI Contracts issued by
unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Companies.
5. Consistent with the Commission’s
authority under Section 6(c) of the 1940
Act to grant exemptive orders to a class
or classes of persons and transactions,
Applicants request exemptions for a
class consisting of Participating
Insurance Companies and their VA and
VLI Accounts investing in the Funds, as
well as their principal underwriters.
6. Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act
provides, in part, that the Commission,
by order upon application, may
conditionally or unconditionally
exempt any person, security or
transaction, or any class or classes of
persons, securities or transactions, from
any provision or provisions of the Act,
or any rule or regulation thereunder, if
and to the extent that such exemption
is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act. The Applicants
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
submit that the exemptions requested
are appropriate in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act. Accordingly, the Applicants
hereby request that the Commission
issue an order under Section 6(c) of the
1940 Act for the exemptions requested
herein.
7. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act
provides, among other things, that it is
unlawful for any company to serve as
investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any registered open-end
investment company if an affiliated
person of that company is subject to a
disqualification enumerated in Sections
9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(i) and
(ii) and Rules 6e–3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii)
under the Act provide exemptions from
Section 9(a) under certain
circumstances, subject to the limitations
discussed above on mixed funding,
extended mixed funding, and shared
funding. These exemptions limit the
application of the eligibility restrictions
to affiliated individuals or companies
that directly participate in management
or administration of the underlying
investment company.
8. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940 Act
provide exemptions from pass-through
voting requirements with respect to
several significant matters, assuming the
limitations on mixed funding, extended
mixed funding, and shared funding are
observed. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and
6e–3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the
voting instructions of its variable life
insurance contract owners with respect
to the investments of an underlying
investment company, or any contract
between such an investment company
and its investment adviser, when
required to do so by an insurance
regulatory authority (subject to the
provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and
(b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)).
9. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that an
insurance company may disregard the
voting instructions of variable life
insurance contract owners if such
owners initiate any change in an
underlying investment company’s
investment policies, principal
underwriter or any investment adviser
(provided that disregarding such voting
instructions is reasonable and subject to
the other provisions of paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B) and (b)(7)(ii)(C) of
Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)).
10. Both Rule 6e–2 and Rule 6e–3(T)
generally recognize that a variable life
insurance contract is primarily a life
insurance contract containing many
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
important elements unique to life
insurance contracts and subject to
extensive state insurance regulation. In
adopting subparagraph (b)(15)(iii) of
these Rules, the Commission implicitly
recognized that state insurance
regulators have authority, pursuant to
state insurance laws or regulations, to
disapprove or require changes in
investment policies, investment
advisers, or principal underwriters.
11. Applicants represent that the sale
of Fund shares to Qualified Plans,
Advisers, and General Accounts will not
have any impact on the exemptions
requested herein regarding the disregard
of pass-through voting rights. Shares
sold to Plans will be held by such Plans.
The exercise of voting rights by Plans,
whether by trustees, participants,
beneficiaries, or investment managers
engaged by the Plans, does not raise the
type of issues respecting disregard of
voting rights that are raised by VLI
Accounts. With respect to Plans, which
are not registered as investment
companies under the 1940 Act, there is
no requirement to pass through voting
rights to Plan participants. Indeed, to
the contrary, applicable law expressly
reserves voting rights associated with
Plan assets to certain specified persons.
12. Similarly, the sale of Fund shares
to an Adviser and to the General
Accounts of Participating Insurance
Companies will not have any impact on
the exemptions requested herein
regarding the disregard of pass-through
voting rights. The exercise of voting
rights by Advisers and the General
Accounts of Participating Insurance
Companies does not raise the type of
issues respecting disregard of voting
rights that are raised by VLI Accounts.
Neither Advisers nor General Accounts
are registered as investment companies
under the Act, and are not subject to any
pass-through voting requirements.
13. Applicants recognize that the
Commission’s primary concern with
respect to mixed funding, extended
mixed funding, and shared funding
issues is the potential for irreconcilable
conflicts between the interests of
owners of variable life insurance
contracts and those of other investors in
an open end investment company
serving as an investment vehicle for
such contracts. The prohibitions on
mixed and shared funding might reflect
concern regarding possible different
investment motivations among
investors. When Rule 6e–2 was first
adopted, variable annuity separate
accounts could invest in mutual funds
whose shares were also offered to the
general public. However, now, under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the ‘‘Code’’), any underlying
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
funds, including a Fund, that sells
shares to VA Accounts or VLI Accounts,
would, in effect, be precluded from also
selling its shares to the public.
Consequently, the Funds may not sell
their shares to the public.
14. Applicants assert that the rights of
an insurance company or a state
insurance regulator to disregard the
voting instructions of owners of
Variable Contracts is not inconsistent
with either mixed funding or shared
funding. Applicants argue that the
National Association of Insurance
Commissioners Variable Life Insurance
Model Regulation (the ‘‘NAIC Model
Regulation’’) suggests that it is unlikely
that insurance regulators would find an
underlying fund’s investment policy,
investment adviser or principal
underwriter objectionable for one type
of Variable Contract but not another
type.
15. Applicants assert that shared
funding by unaffiliated insurers, in this
respect, is no different than the use of
the same investment company as the
funding vehicle for affiliated insurers,
which Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) permit. Affiliated insurers
may be domiciled in different states and
be subject to differing state law
requirements. Affiliation does not
reduce the potential, if any exists, for
differences in state regulatory
requirements. In any event, the
conditions set forth below are designed
to safeguard against, and provide
procedures for resolving, any adverse
effects that differences among state
regulatory requirements may produce. If
a particular state insurance regulator’s
decision conflicts with the majority of
other state regulators, then the affected
Participating Insurance Company will
be required to withdraw its separate
account investments in the relevant
Fund. This requirement will be
provided for in the Participation
Agreement that will be entered into by
Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
16. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) give Participating Insurance
Companies the right to disregard the
voting instructions of VLI Contract
owners in certain circumstances. This
right derives from the authority of state
insurance regulators over VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts. Under Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15), a
Participating Insurance Company may
disregard VLI Contract owner voting
instructions only with respect to certain
specified items. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for
divergent judgments as to the
advisability or legality of a change in
investment policies, principal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
underwriter or investment adviser
initiated by such Contract owners. The
potential for disagreement is limited by
the requirements in Rules 6e–2 and 6e–
3(T) that the Participating Insurance
Company’s disregard of voting
instructions be reasonable and based on
specific good faith determinations.
17. A particular Participating
Insurance Company’s disregard of
voting instructions, nevertheless, could
conflict with the voting instructions of
a majority of VLI Contract owners. The
Participating Insurance Company’s
action possibly could be different than
the determination of all or some of the
other Participating Insurance
Companies (including affiliated
insurers) that the voting instructions of
VLI Contract owners should prevail, and
either could preclude a majority vote
approving the change or could represent
a minority view. If the Participating
Insurance Company’s judgment
represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, then the
Participating Insurance Company may
be required, at the relevant Fund’s
election, to withdraw its VLI Accounts’
and VA Accounts’ investments in the
relevant Fund. No charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. This requirement will be
provided for in the Participation
Agreement entered into by the
Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
18. Applicants argue that there is no
reason why the investment policies of a
Fund would or should be materially
different from what these policies
would or should be if the Fund
supported only VA Accounts or VLI
Accounts supporting flexible premium
or scheduled premium VLI Contracts.
Each type of insurance contract is
designed as a long-term investment
program.
19. Each Fund will be managed to
attempt to achieve its specified
investment objective, and not favor or
disfavor any particular Participating
Insurance Company or type of insurance
contract. There is no reason to believe
that different features of various types of
Variable Contracts will lead to different
investment policies for each or for
different VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts. The sale of Variable Contracts
and ultimate success of all VA Accounts
and VLI Accounts depends, at least in
part, on satisfactory investment
performance, which provides an
incentive for each Participating
Insurance Company to seek optimal
investment performance.
20. Furthermore, no single investment
strategy can be identified as appropriate
to a particular Variable Contract. Each
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62477
‘‘pool’’ of VLI Contract and VA Contract
owners is composed of individuals of
diverse financial status, age, insurance
needs and investment goals. A Fund
supporting even one type of Variable
Contract must accommodate these
diverse factors in order to attract and
retain purchasers. Permitting mixed and
shared funding will provide economic
support for the continuation of the
Funds. Mixed and shared funding will
broaden the base of potential Variable
Contract owner investors, which may
facilitate the establishment of additional
Funds serving diverse goals.
21. Applicants do not believe that the
sale of the shares to Qualified Plans,
Advisers, and General Accounts will
increase the potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts of interest
between or among different types of
investors. In particular, Applicants see
very little potential for such conflicts
beyond those that would otherwise exist
between owners of VLI Contracts and
VA Contracts. Applicants submit that
either there are no conflicts of interest
or that there exists the ability by the
affected parties to resolve such conflicts
consistent with the best interests of VLI
Contract owners, VA Contract owners,
and Plan participants.
22. Applicants considered whether
there are any issues raised under the
Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue
Rulings thereunder if VA Accounts, VLI
Accounts, Advisers, General Accounts
and Qualified Plans all invest in the
same Fund. However, the Applicants
have concluded that neither the Code,
nor the Treasury Regulations nor
Revenue Rulings thereunder, present
any inherent conflicts of interest if VA
Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers,
General Accounts and Qualified Plans
all invest in the same Fund.
23. Applicants note that, while there
are differences in the manner in which
distributions from VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, and Plans are taxed, these
differences have no impact on the
Funds. When distributions are to be
made, and a VLI Account, VA Account,
or Plan is unable to net purchase
payments to make distributions, the VLI
Account, VA Account, or Plan will
redeem shares of the relevant Fund at its
net asset value in conformity with Rule
22c–1 under the 1940 Act (without the
imposition of any sales charge) to
provide proceeds to meet distribution
needs. A Participating Insurance
Company will then make distributions
in accordance with the terms of its
Variable Contracts, and a Plan will then
make distributions in accordance with
the terms of the Plan.
24. Applicants considered whether it
is possible to provide an equitable
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62478
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
means of giving voting rights to all
Variable Contract owners, Qualified
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts,
and determined that it is possible. In
connection with any meeting of Fund
shareholders, the soliciting Fund will
inform each Participating Insurance
Company (with respect to its VLI
Accounts, VA Accounts and General
Account), Adviser, and Qualified Plan
of its share holdings and provide other
information necessary for such
shareholders to participate in the
meeting (e.g., proxy materials). Each
Participating Insurance Company then
will solicit voting instructions from
owners of VLI Contracts and VA
Contracts in accordance with Rules 6e–
2 or 6e–3(T), or Section
12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) of the Act, as
applicable, and its Participation
Agreement with the relevant Fund.
Shares of a Fund that are held by an
Adviser or a General Account will
generally be voted in the same
proportion as all votes cast on behalf of
all Variable Contract owners having
voting rights. However, an Adviser or
General Account will vote its shares in
such other manner as may be required
by the Commission or its staff. Shares
held by Plans will be voted in
accordance with applicable law. The
voting rights provided to Plans with
respect to the shares would be no
different from the voting rights that are
provided to Plans with respect to shares
of mutual funds sold to the general
public. Furthermore, if a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of
a Plan’s decision to disregard Plan
participant voting instructions, if
applicable, and that decision represents
a minority position or would preclude
a majority vote, the Plan may be
required, at the election of the relevant
Fund, to withdraw its investment in the
Fund, and no charge or penalty will be
imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
25. Applicants do not believe that the
veto power of state insurance
commissioners over certain potential
changes to Fund investment objectives
approved by Variable Contract owners
creates conflicts between the interests of
such owners and the interests of Plan
participants, Advisers or General
Accounts. Applicants note that a basic
premise of corporate democracy and
shareholder voting is that not all
shareholders may agree with a
particular proposal. Their interests and
opinions may differ, but this does not
mean that inherent conflicts of interest
exist between or among such
shareholders or that occasional conflicts
of interest that do occur between or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
among them are likely to be
irreconcilable.
26. Although Participating Insurance
Companies may have to overcome
regulatory impediments in redeeming
shares of a Fund held by their VLI and
VA Accounts, the Plans and the
participants in participant-directed
Plans can make decisions quickly and
redeem their shares in a Fund and
reinvest in another investment company
or other funding vehicle without
impediments, or as is the case with most
Plans, hold cash pending suitable
investment. As a result, conflicts
between the interests of Variable
Contract owners and the interests of
Plans and Plan participants can usually
be resolved quickly since the Plans can,
on their own, redeem their Fund shares.
Advisers and General Accounts can
similarly redeem their shares of a Fund
and make alternative investments at any
time.
27. Finally, Applicants considered
whether there is a potential for future
conflicts of interest between
Participating Insurance Companies and
Plans created by future changes in the
tax laws. Applicants do not see any
greater potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts arising between
the interests of Variable Contract owners
and Plan participants from future
changes in the federal tax laws than that
which already exists between VLI
Contract owners and VA Contract
owners.
28. Applicants recognize that the
foregoing is not an all-inclusive list, but
rather is representative of issues that
they believe are relevant to this
application. Applicants believe that the
discussion contained herein
demonstrates that the sale of Fund
shares to Plans would not increase the
risk of material irreconcilable conflicts
between the interests of Plan
participants and Variable Contract
owners or other investors. Further,
Applicants submit that the use of the
Funds with respect to Plans is not
substantially dissimilar from each
Fund’s current and anticipated use, in
that Plans, like VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts, are generally long-term
investors.
29. Applicants assert that permitting a
Fund to sell its shares to an Adviser or
to a General Account will enhance
management of each Fund without
raising significant concerns regarding
material irreconcilable conflicts among
different types of investors.
30. Various factors have limited the
number of insurance companies that
offer Variable Contracts. These factors
include the costs of organizing and
operating a funding vehicle, certain
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
insurers’ lack of experience with respect
to investment management, and the lack
of name recognition by the public of
certain insurance companies as
investment experts. In particular, some
smaller life insurance companies may
not find it economically feasible, or
within their investment or
administrative expertise, to enter the
Variable Contract business on their own.
Use of the Funds as a common
investment vehicle for Variable
Contracts would reduce or eliminate
these concerns. Mixed and shared
funding should also provide several
benefits to owners of Variable Contracts
by eliminating a significant portion of
the costs of establishing and
administering separate underlying
funds.
31. Applicants state that Participating
Insurance Companies will benefit not
only from the investment and
administrative expertise of the Funds’
Adviser, but also from the potential cost
efficiencies and investment flexibility
afforded by larger pools of funds. Mixed
and shared funding also would permit
a greater amount of assets available for
investment by a Fund, thereby
promoting economies of scale, by
permitting increased safety through
greater diversification, or by making the
addition of new Funds more feasible.
Therefore, making the Funds available
for mixed and shared funding will
encourage more insurance companies to
offer Variable Contracts. This should
result in increased competition with
respect to both Variable Contract design
and pricing, which can in turn be
expected to result in more product
variety. Applicants also assert that sale
of shares in a Fund to Plans, in addition
to VLI Accounts and VA Accounts, will
result in an increased amount of assets
available for investment in a Fund. This
may benefit Variable Contract owners by
promoting economies of scale,
permitting increased safety of
investments through greater
diversification, and making the addition
of new Funds more feasible.
32. Applicants also submit that,
regardless of the type of shareholder in
a Fund, an Adviser is or would be
contractually and otherwise obligated to
manage the Fund solely and exclusively
in accordance with that Fund’s
investment objectives, policies and
restrictions, as well as any guidelines
established by the applicable Trust’s
board of trustees or directors (a
‘‘Board’’). Thus, each Fund will be
managed in the same manner as any
other mutual fund.
33. Applicants assert that sales of
Fund shares, as described above, will
not have any adverse federal income tax
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
consequences to other investors in such
a Fund.
34. In addition, Applicants note that
the Commission has issued numerous
orders permitting mixed funding,
extended mixed funding, and shared
funding. Therefore, granting the
exemptions requested herein is in the
public interest and, as discussed above,
will not compromise the regulatory
purposes of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), or
15(b) of the Act or Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T)
thereunder.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that the Commission
order requested herein shall be subject
to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of each
Trust will consist of persons who are
not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Trust
(‘‘disinterested directors/trustees’’), as
defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940
Act, and the rules thereunder, and as
modified by any applicable orders of the
Commission, except that if this
condition is not met by reason of death,
disqualification or bona fide resignation
of any trustee or trustees, then the
operation of this condition will be
suspended: (a) for a period of 90 days
if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled
by the Board, (b) for a period of 150
days if a vote of shareholders is required
to fill the vacancy or vacancies, or (c) for
such longer period as the Commission
may prescribe by order upon
application or by future rule.
2. The Board of each Trust will
monitor its respective Funds for the
existence of any material irreconcilable
conflict between and among the
interests of the owners of all VLI
Contracts and VA Contracts and
participants of all Plans investing in the
Fund, and determine what action, if
any, should be taken in response to such
conflicts. A material irreconcilable
conflict may arise for a variety of
reasons, including: (a) An action by any
state insurance regulatory authority; (b)
a change in applicable federal or state
insurance, tax, or securities laws or
regulations, or a public ruling, private
letter ruling, no-action or interpretive
letter, or any similar action by
insurance, tax or securities regulatory
authorities; (c) an administrative or
judicial decision in any relevant
proceeding; (d) the manner in which the
investments of the Fund are being
managed; (e) a difference in voting
instructions given by VA Contract
owners, VLI Contract owners, and Plans
or Plan participants; (f) a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to
disregard the voting instructions of
contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
decision by a Plan to disregard the
voting instructions of Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies
(on their own behalf, as well as by
virtue of any investment of General
Account assets in a Fund), any Adviser
to a Fund, and any Plan that executes
a Participation Agreement upon its
becoming an owner of 10% or more of
the net assets of a Fund (collectively,
‘‘Participants’’) will report any potential
or existing conflicts to the relevant
Board. Each Participant will be
responsible for assisting the Board in
carrying out the Board’s responsibilities
under these conditions by providing the
Board with all information reasonably
necessary for the Board to consider any
issues raised. This responsibility
includes, but is not limited to, an
obligation by each Participating
Insurance Company to inform the Board
whenever Variable Contract owner
voting instructions are disregarded, and,
if pass-through voting is applicable, an
obligation by each trustee for a Plan to
inform the Board whenever it has
determined to disregard Plan participant
voting instructions. The responsibility
to report such information and conflicts,
and to assist the Board, will be a
contractual obligation of all
Participating Insurance Companies
under their Participation Agreement
with a Trust, and these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to
the interests of the Variable Contract
owners. The responsibility to report
such information and conflicts, and to
assist the Board, also will be contractual
obligations of all Plans under their
Participation Agreement with a Trust,
and such agreements will provide that
these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of Plan
participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of
the Board of a Trust, or a majority of the
disinterested directors/trustees of the
Board, that a material irreconcilable
conflict exists, then the relevant
Participant will, at its expense and to
the extent reasonably practicable (as
determined by a majority of the
disinterested directors/trustees), take
whatever steps are necessary to remedy
or eliminate the material irreconcilable
conflict, up to and including: (a)
Withdrawing the assets allocable to
some or all of their VLI Accounts or VA
Accounts from the Fund and reinvesting
such assets in a different investment
vehicle including another Fund; (b) in
the case of a Participating Insurance
Company, submitting the question as to
whether such segregation should be
implemented to a vote of all affected
Variable Contract owners and, as
appropriate, segregating the assets of
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62479
any appropriate group (i.e., VA Contract
owners or VLI Contact owners of one or
more Participating Insurance
Companies) that votes in favor of such
segregation, or offering to the affected
Contract owners the option of making
such a change; (c) withdrawing the
assets allocable to some or all of the
Plans from the affected Fund and
reinvesting them in a different
investment medium; and (d)
establishing a new registered
management investment company or
managed separate account. If a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of
a decision by a Participating Insurance
Company to disregard Variable Contract
owner voting instructions, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, then
the Participating Insurance Company
may be required, at the election of the
Trust, to withdraw such Participating
Insurance Company’s VA Account and
VLI Account investments in the Fund,
and no charge or penalty will be
imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
If a material irreconcilable conflict
arises because of a Plan’s decision to
disregard Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, the
Plan may be required, at the election of
the Trust, to withdraw its investment in
the Fund, and no charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. The responsibility to take
remedial action in the event of a Board
determination of a material
irreconcilable conflict and to bear the
cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants
under their Participation Agreement
with a Trust, and these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to
the interests of Variable Contract owners
or, as applicable, Plan participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a
majority of the disinterested directors/
trustees of the Board of each Trust will
determine whether or not any proposed
action adequately remedies any material
irreconcilable conflict, but, in no event,
will the Fund or its Adviser be required
to establish a new funding vehicle for
any Variable Contract or Plan. No
Participating Insurance Company will
be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for any
Variable Contract if any offer to do so
has been declined by vote of a majority
of the Contract owners materially and
adversely affected by the material
irreconcilable conflict. Further, no Plan
will be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for the
Plan if: (a) A majority of the Plan
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62480
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices
participants materially and adversely
affected by the irreconcilable material
conflict vote to decline such offer, or (b)
pursuant to documents governing the
Plan, the Plan trustee makes such
decision without a Plan participant
vote.
5. The Board of each Trust’s
determination of the existence of a
material irreconcilable conflict and its
implications will be made known in
writing promptly to all Participants.
6. Participating Insurance Companies
will provide pass-through voting
privileges to all Variable Contract
owners whose Contracts are issued
through registered VLI Accounts or
registered VA Accounts for as long as
required by the Act as interpreted by the
Commission. However, as to Variable
Contracts issued through VA Accounts
or VLI Accounts not registered as
investment companies under the Act,
pass-through voting privileges will be
extended to owners of such Contracts to
the extent granted by the Participating
Insurance Company. Accordingly, such
Participating Insurance Companies,
where applicable, will vote the shares of
each Fund held in their VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts in a manner
consistent with voting instructions
timely received from Variable Contract
owners. Participating Insurance
Companies will be responsible for
assuring that each of their VLI and VA
Accounts investing in a Fund calculates
voting privileges in a manner consistent
with all other Participating Insurance
Companies investing in that Fund.
The obligation to calculate voting
privileges as provided in this
application shall be a contractual
obligation of all Participating Insurance
Companies under their Participation
Agreement with the Trust. Each
Participating Insurance Company will
vote shares of each Fund held in its VLI
or VA Accounts for which no timely
voting instructions are received, as well
as shares held by its General Account or
otherwise attributed to it, in the same
proportion as those shares for which
voting instructions are received. Each
Plan will vote as required by applicable
law, governing Plan documents and as
provided in this application.
7. As long as the Act requires passthrough voting privileges to be provided
to Variable Contract owners or the
Commission interprets the Act to
require the same, a Fund’s Adviser or
any General Account will vote their
shares of the Fund in the same
proportion as all votes cast on behalf of
all Variable Contract owners having
voting rights; provided, however, that
such an Adviser or General Account
shall vote its shares in such other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Oct 16, 2014
Jkt 235001
manner as may be required by the
Commission or its staff.
8. Each Fund will comply with all
provisions of the Act requiring voting by
shareholders (which, for these purposes,
shall be the persons having a voting
interest in its shares), and, in particular,
the Fund will either provide for annual
meetings (except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret Section 16 of
the Act not to require such meetings) or
comply with Section 16(c) of the Act
(although each Fund is not, or will not
be, one of those trusts of the type
described in Section 16(c) of the Act), as
well as with Section 16(a) of the Act
and, if and when applicable, Section
16(b) of the Act. Further, each Fund will
act in accordance with the
Commission’s interpretations of the
requirements of Section 16(a) with
respect to periodic elections of
directors/trustees and with whatever
rules the Commission may promulgate
thereto.
9. A Fund will make its shares
available to the VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, and Plans at or about the time
it accepts any seed capital from its
Adviser or from a General Account of a
Participating Insurance Company.
10. Each Fund has notified, or will
notify, all Participants that disclosure
regarding potential risks of mixed and
shared funding may be appropriate in
VLI Account and VA Account
prospectuses or Plan documents. Each
Fund will disclose, in its prospectus
that: (a) Shares of the Fund may be
offered to both VA Accounts and VLI
Accounts and, if applicable, to Plans, (b)
due to differences in tax treatment and
other considerations, the interests of
various Variable Contract owners
participating in the Fund and the
interests of Plan Participants investing
in the Fund, if applicable, may conflict,
and (c) the Trust’s Board will monitor
events in order to identify the existence
of any material irreconcilable conflicts
and to determine what action, if any,
should be taken in response to any such
conflicts.
11. If and to the extent Rule 6e–2 and
Rule 6e–3(T) under the Act are
amended, or proposed Rule 6e–3 under
the Act is adopted, to provide
exemptive relief from any provision of
the Act, or the rules thereunder, with
respect to mixed or shared funding, on
terms and conditions materially
different from any exemptions granted
in the order requested in this
application, then each Fund and/or
Participating Insurance Companies, as
appropriate, shall take such steps as
may be necessary to comply with Rules
6e–2 or 6e–3(T), as amended, or Rule
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
6e–3, to the extent such rules are
applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually,
shall submit to the Board of each Trust
such reports, materials or data as the
Board reasonably may request so that
the directors/trustees of the Board may
fully carry out the obligations imposed
upon the Board by the conditions
contained in this application. Such
reports, materials and data shall be
submitted more frequently if deemed
appropriate by the Board of a Trust. The
obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials and
data to the Board, when it so reasonably
requests, shall be a contractual
obligation of all Participants under their
Participation Agreement with the Trust.
13. All reports of potential or existing
conflicts received by the Board of each
Trust, and all Board action with regard
to determining the existence of a
conflict, notifying Participants of a
conflict and determining whether any
proposed action adequately remedies a
conflict, will be properly recorded in
the minutes of the Board or other
appropriate records, and such minutes
or other records shall be made available
to the Commission upon request.
14. Each Fund will not accept a
purchase order from a Plan if such
purchase would make the Plan an
owner of 10 percent or more of the net
assets of the Fund unless the Plan
executes an agreement with the Fund
governing participation in the Fund that
includes the conditions set forth herein
to the extent applicable. A Plan will
execute an application containing an
acknowledgement of this condition at
the time of its initial purchase of shares.
Conclusion
For all of the reasons explained above,
Applicants submit that the exemptions
requested are appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–24684 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62473-62480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24684]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-31281; File No. 812-14226]
SunAmerica Series Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
October 10, 2014.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act'' or
``Act''), seeking exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b)
of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: SunAmerica Series Trust, Seasons Series Trust, Anchor
Series Trust, VALIC Company I, and VALIC Company II (each referred to
herein as a ``Trust,'' and collectively as the ``Trusts''), SunAmerica
Asset Management LLC (formerly, SunAmerica Asset Management Corp.
(``SAAMCo''), and The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company
(``VALIC'') (together with SAAMCo and the Trusts, the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order granting
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Act and
Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in cases where a life
insurance company separate account supporting variable life insurance
contracts (``VLI Account'') holds shares of an existing portfolio of a
Trust (an ``Existing Fund'') or a ``Future Fund,'' \1\ as defined below
(any Existing Fund or Future Fund is referred to herein as a ``Fund'',
and collectively as the ``Funds''), and one or more of the following
other types of investors also hold shares of the Funds: (1) any life
insurance company separate account supporting variable annuity
contracts,
[[Page 62474]]
whether or not registered as an investment company with the Commission
(a ``VA Account''), (2) any VLI Account, whether or not registered as
an investment company with the Commission, (3) the investment adviser
or any subadviser to a Fund or affiliated persons of the investment
adviser or subadviser (representing seed money investments in the Fund)
(``Advisers''), (4) any general account of an insurance company
depositor of VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts (representing seed money
investments in the Fund) (``General Account''); and/or (5) any
qualified group pension or group retirement plan administered by a
trustee outside the separate account context (a ``Plan'' or ``Qualified
Plan'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As used herein, a ``Future Fund'' is any investment company
(or investment portfolio or series thereof), other than an Existing
Fund, designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts and to
which the Applicants or their affiliates may in the future serve as
investment advisers, investment subadvisers, investment managers,
administrators, principal underwriters, or sponsors.
DATES: Filing Date: The application was filed on October 25, 2013, and
amended and restated on January 30, 2014, and September 4, 2014.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on November 4, 2014, and should be accompanied
by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by
writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants, AIG Life and Retirement c/o
Mark Matthes, Associate General Counsel, 2919 Allen Parkway, 4th Floor,
Houston, TX 77019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonny Oh, Senior Counsel, or Joyce M.
Pickholz, Branch Chief, Disclosure Review Office (Insured Investments),
Division of Investment Management at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search.htm,
or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. SunAmerica Series Trust was formed as a Massachusetts business
trust on September 11, 1992, and is registered under the Act as an
open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-07238). The
Trust is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the
Act and is currently comprised of forty (40) Funds. The Trust issues a
separate series of shares of beneficial interest for each of its Funds
and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the ``1933 Act'') on Form N-1A (Reg. File No. 33-
52742) to register such shares. The Trust may establish additional
Funds in the future and additional classes of shares for such Funds.
Shares of the Funds of the SunAmerica Series Trust are not and will not
be offered to the general public.
2. Seasons Series Trust was formed as a Massachusetts business
trust on October 10, 1995, and is registered under the Act as an open-
end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-07725). The Trust
is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the Act
and is currently comprised of twenty-one (21) Funds. The Trust issues a
separate series of shares of beneficial interest for each of its Funds
and has filed a registration statement under the 1933 Act on Form N-1A
(Reg. File No. 333-08653) to register such shares. The Trust may
establish additional Funds in the future and additional classes of
shares for such Funds. Shares of the Funds of the Seasons Series Trust
are not and will not be offered to the general public.
3. Anchor Series Trust was formed as a Massachusetts business trust
on August 26, 1983, and is registered under the Act as an open-end
management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-03836). The Trust is a
series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the Act and is
currently comprised of eight (8) Funds. The Trust issues a separate
series of shares of beneficial interest for each of its Funds and has
filed a registration statement under the 1933 Act on Form N-1A (Reg.
File No. 2-86188) to register such shares. The Trust may establish
additional Funds in the future and additional classes of shares for
such Funds. Shares of the Funds of the Anchor Series Trust are not and
will not be offered to the general public.
4. VALIC Company I (``VC I'') was formed as a Maryland corporation
on December 7, 1984 and is registered under the Act as an open-end
management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-03738). VC I is a
series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the Act and is
currently comprised of thirty-four (34) separate Funds. VC I issues a
separate series of shares for each of its Funds and has filed a
registration statement under the 1933 Act on Form N-1A (Reg. File No.
2-83631) to register such shares. VC I may establish additional Funds
in the future and additional classes of shares for such Funds. Shares
of the Funds of VC I are not and will not be offered to the general
public.
5. VALIC Company II (``VC II'') was organized as a Delaware
statutory trust on May 6, 1998, and is registered under the Act as an
open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-08789). VC II
is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 under the Act
and is currently comprised of fifteen (15) separate Funds. VC II issues
a separate series of shares of beneficial interest for each of its
Funds and has filed a registration statement under the 1933 Act on Form
N-1A (Reg. File No. 333-53589) to register such shares. VC II may
establish additional Funds in the future and additional classes of
shares for such Funds. Shares of the Funds of VC II are not and will
not be offered to the general public.
6. SAAMCo serves as the investment adviser and manager for all the
Funds of the SunAmerica Series Trust, Seasons Series Trust, and Anchor
Series Trust and serves as the subadviser to certain Funds of VC I and
VC II. SAAMCo is an indirectly and wholly owned subsidiary of American
International Group, Inc. (``AIG'').
7. VALIC serves as the investment adviser to VC I and VC II and is
a stock life insurance company originally organized as The Variable
Annuity Life Insurance Company of America, located in Washington, DC
and re-organized under the laws of the state of Texas on August 20,
1968. VALIC is an indirectly and wholly owned subsidiary of AIG and is
registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act.
8. The Funds propose to offer their shares to VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts of various life insurance companies (each a ``Participating
Insurance Company,'' and collectively, the ``Participating Insurance
Companies'') to serve as an investment medium to support variable life
insurance contracts (``VLI Contracts'') and variable annuity contracts
(``VA Contracts'') (together, ``Variable Contracts'') issued through
such VLI and VA Accounts. Each VLI Account and VA Account is or will be
established as a segregated asset account by a Participating Insurance
Company pursuant to the insurance law of the insurance company's state
of domicile. As such, the assets of each will be the property of the
Participating Insurance
[[Page 62475]]
Company, and that portion of the assets of such a VLI or VA Account
equal to the reserves and other contract liabilities with respect to
the VLI or VA Account will not be chargeable with liabilities arising
out of any other business that the insurance company may conduct. The
income, gains and losses, realized or unrealized, from such a VLI or VA
Account's assets will be credited to or charged against the VLI or VA
Account without regard to other income, gains or losses of the
Participating Insurance Company. If a VLI Account or VA Account is
registered as an investment company, it will be a ``separate account''
as defined by Rule 0-1(e) (or any successor rule) under the Act and
will be registered as a unit investment trust. For purposes of the Act,
the Participating Insurance Company that establishes such a registered
VLI Account or VA Account is the depositor and sponsor of the VLI or VA
Account as those terms have been interpreted by the Commission with
respect to variable life insurance and variable annuity separate
accounts.
9. The Participating Insurance Companies are currently American
General Life, The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of
New York (``USLIC''), and VALIC. Each Participating Insurance Company
is an indirect subsidiary of AIG. Various other life insurance
companies that are not affiliated persons of American General Life,
USLIC, and VALIC may be, or in the future become, Participating
Insurance Companies. At the current time, the following VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts of American General Life, USLIC, and VALIC invest in
one or more of the Trusts: American General Life: Separate Account 8,
Separate Account 101, Separate Account 102, Separate Account A,
Separate Account D, Separate Account II, Separate Account IV, Separate
Account VA-2, Separate Account VL-R, Separate Account VL-U LIS,
Separate Account VUL, and A.G. Separate Account A; USLIC: Separate
Account USL VA-R, Separate Account USL VL-R and Separate Account USL B;
and VALIC: Separate Account A.
10. Each Fund will sell its shares to VLI Accounts and VA Accounts
only if each Participating Insurance Company sponsoring such a VLI
Account or VA Account enters into a participation agreement with the
Fund. The participation agreements define or will define the
relationship between each Fund and each Participating Insurance Company
and memorialize or will memorialize, among other matters, the fact
that, except where the agreement specifically provides otherwise, the
Participating Insurance Company will remain responsible for
establishing and maintaining any VLI Account or VA Account covered by
the agreement and for complying with all applicable requirements of
state and federal law pertaining to such VLI and VA Accounts and to the
sale and distribution of Variable Contracts issued through such VLI and
VA Accounts. The role of each Fund under this arrangement, with regard
to the federal securities laws, will consist of offering and selling
shares of the Fund to the VLI Accounts and VA Accounts and fulfilling
any conditions that the Commission may impose in granting the requested
order.
11. The use of a common management investment company (or
investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for both VLI
Accounts and VA Accounts of the same Participating Insurance Company,
or of two or more insurance companies that are affiliated persons of
each other, is referred to herein as ``mixed funding.'' The use of a
common management investment company (or investment portfolio thereof)
as an investment medium for VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of two or
more Participating Insurance Companies that are not affiliated persons
of each other, is referred to herein as ``shared funding.''
12. Applicants propose that each Fund offer and sell its shares
directly to Plans and assert that Federal tax law permits investment
companies such as the Funds to increase their net assets by selling
shares to Plans.
13. Plans may invest in shares of an investment company as the sole
investment under the Plan, or as one of several investments. Plan
participants may or may not be given an investment choice depending on
the terms of the Plan itself. The trustees or other fiduciaries of a
Plan may vote investment company shares held by the Plan in their own
discretion or, if the applicable Plan so provides, vote such shares in
accordance with instructions from participants in such Plan. Applicants
have no control over whether trustees or other fiduciaries of Plans,
rather than participants in the Plans, have the right to vote under any
particular Plan. Each Plan must be administered in accordance with the
terms of the Plan and as determined by its trustee or trustees.
14. Applicants propose that any Fund may also sell shares to its
Adviser. The Treasury Regulations permit such sales as long as the
return on shares held by an Adviser is computed in the same manner as
shares held by VLI Accounts and VA Accounts, the Adviser does not
intend to sell the shares to the public, and sales to the Adviser are
only made in connection with the creation or management of the Fund for
the purpose of providing seed money for the Fund.
15. Applicants propose that any Fund may also sell shares to a
General Account of a Participating Insurance Company. The Treasury
Regulations permit such sales as long as the return on shares held by a
General Account is computed in the same manner as for shares held by
VLI Accounts and VA Accounts and the Participating Insurance Company
does not intend to sell the shares to the public.
16. The use of a common management investment company (or
investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for VLI Accounts,
VA Accounts, Plans, Advisers, and General Accounts is referred to
herein as ``extended mixed funding.''
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act makes it unlawful for any company to
serve as an investment adviser or principal underwriter of any
investment company, including a unit investment trust, if an affiliated
person of that company is subject to disqualification enumerated in
Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of the Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of
the Act have been deemed by the Commission to require ``pass-through''
voting with respect to an underlying investment company's shares.
2. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) under the Act provide
partial exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the
Act to VLI Accounts supporting certain VLI Contracts and to their life
insurance company depositors under limited circumstances, as described
in the application. Therefore, VLI Accounts, their depositors and their
principal underwriters may not rely on the exemptions provided by Rules
6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) if shares of the Fund are held by a VLI
Account through which flexible premium VLI Contracts are issued, a VLI
Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, a General
Account of a Participating Insurance Company, an Adviser, any VA
Account, or a Plan. Accordingly, Applicants request an order of the
Commission granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and
15(b) of the Act, and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder,
to the extent necessary to permit a scheduled premium VLI Account to
hold shares of Funds when one or more of the following types of
investors also hold shares of the Funds: (1) VA Accounts and VLI
Accounts
[[Page 62476]]
(supporting scheduled premium or flexible premium VLI Contracts) of
affiliated and unaffiliated Participating Insurance Companies, (2)
General Accounts, (3) Advisers, or (4) Plans.
3. Applicants maintain that there is no public policy reason why
VLI Accounts and their Participating Insurance Company depositors (or
principal underwriters) should not be able to rely on the exemptions
provided by Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) just because shares of
Funds held by the VLI Accounts are also held by VA Accounts, other VLI
Accounts, an Adviser, a General Account, or a Qualified Plan. Rather,
Applicants assert that the proposed sale of Fund shares to Qualified
Plans, Advisers, and General Accounts may allow for the development of
larger pools of assets, resulting in the potential for greater
investment and diversification opportunities and for decreased expenses
at higher asset levels resulting in greater cost efficiencies.
Similarly, Applicants believe that the proposed sale of Fund shares to
Advisers and General Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies for
seed money may result in the creation of more Funds as investment
options for certain VA Contracts and VLI Contracts than would otherwise
be the case.
4. For the reasons explained below, Applicants have concluded that
investments by Qualified Plans, Advisers, and General Accounts in the
Funds should not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts
between owners of VLI Contracts and other types of investors or between
owners of VLI Contracts issued by unaffiliated Participating Insurance
Companies.
5. Consistent with the Commission's authority under Section 6(c) of
the 1940 Act to grant exemptive orders to a class or classes of persons
and transactions, Applicants request exemptions for a class consisting
of Participating Insurance Companies and their VA and VLI Accounts
investing in the Funds, as well as their principal underwriters.
6. Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act provides, in part, that the
Commission, by order upon application, may conditionally or
unconditionally exempt any person, security or transaction, or any
class or classes of persons, securities or transactions, from any
provision or provisions of the Act, or any rule or regulation
thereunder, if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act. The Applicants submit that the exemptions
requested are appropriate in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Act. Accordingly, the Applicants hereby
request that the Commission issue an order under Section 6(c) of the
1940 Act for the exemptions requested herein.
7. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act provides, among other things,
that it is unlawful for any company to serve as investment adviser or
principal underwriter of any registered open-end investment company if
an affiliated person of that company is subject to a disqualification
enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(i) and (ii)
and Rules 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the Act provide exemptions
from Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, subject to the
limitations discussed above on mixed funding, extended mixed funding,
and shared funding. These exemptions limit the application of the
eligibility restrictions to affiliated individuals or companies that
directly participate in management or administration of the underlying
investment company.
8. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940
Act provide exemptions from pass-through voting requirements with
respect to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on
mixed funding, extended mixed funding, and shared funding are observed.
Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of its variable
life insurance contract owners with respect to the investments of an
underlying investment company, or any contract between such an
investment company and its investment adviser, when required to do so
by an insurance regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T)).
9. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide
that an insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of
variable life insurance contract owners if such owners initiate any
change in an underlying investment company's investment policies,
principal underwriter or any investment adviser (provided that
disregarding such voting instructions is reasonable and subject to the
other provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B) and
(b)(7)(ii)(C) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T)).
10. Both Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) generally recognize that a
variable life insurance contract is primarily a life insurance contract
containing many important elements unique to life insurance contracts
and subject to extensive state insurance regulation. In adopting
subparagraph (b)(15)(iii) of these Rules, the Commission implicitly
recognized that state insurance regulators have authority, pursuant to
state insurance laws or regulations, to disapprove or require changes
in investment policies, investment advisers, or principal underwriters.
11. Applicants represent that the sale of Fund shares to Qualified
Plans, Advisers, and General Accounts will not have any impact on the
exemptions requested herein regarding the disregard of pass-through
voting rights. Shares sold to Plans will be held by such Plans. The
exercise of voting rights by Plans, whether by trustees, participants,
beneficiaries, or investment managers engaged by the Plans, does not
raise the type of issues respecting disregard of voting rights that are
raised by VLI Accounts. With respect to Plans, which are not registered
as investment companies under the 1940 Act, there is no requirement to
pass through voting rights to Plan participants. Indeed, to the
contrary, applicable law expressly reserves voting rights associated
with Plan assets to certain specified persons.
12. Similarly, the sale of Fund shares to an Adviser and to the
General Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies will not have any
impact on the exemptions requested herein regarding the disregard of
pass-through voting rights. The exercise of voting rights by Advisers
and the General Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies does not
raise the type of issues respecting disregard of voting rights that are
raised by VLI Accounts. Neither Advisers nor General Accounts are
registered as investment companies under the Act, and are not subject
to any pass-through voting requirements.
13. Applicants recognize that the Commission's primary concern with
respect to mixed funding, extended mixed funding, and shared funding
issues is the potential for irreconcilable conflicts between the
interests of owners of variable life insurance contracts and those of
other investors in an open end investment company serving as an
investment vehicle for such contracts. The prohibitions on mixed and
shared funding might reflect concern regarding possible different
investment motivations among investors. When Rule 6e-2 was first
adopted, variable annuity separate accounts could invest in mutual
funds whose shares were also offered to the general public. However,
now, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
``Code''), any underlying
[[Page 62477]]
funds, including a Fund, that sells shares to VA Accounts or VLI
Accounts, would, in effect, be precluded from also selling its shares
to the public. Consequently, the Funds may not sell their shares to the
public.
14. Applicants assert that the rights of an insurance company or a
state insurance regulator to disregard the voting instructions of
owners of Variable Contracts is not inconsistent with either mixed
funding or shared funding. Applicants argue that the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners Variable Life Insurance Model
Regulation (the ``NAIC Model Regulation'') suggests that it is unlikely
that insurance regulators would find an underlying fund's investment
policy, investment adviser or principal underwriter objectionable for
one type of Variable Contract but not another type.
15. Applicants assert that shared funding by unaffiliated insurers,
in this respect, is no different than the use of the same investment
company as the funding vehicle for affiliated insurers, which Rules 6e-
2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) permit. Affiliated insurers may be
domiciled in different states and be subject to differing state law
requirements. Affiliation does not reduce the potential, if any exists,
for differences in state regulatory requirements. In any event, the
conditions set forth below are designed to safeguard against, and
provide procedures for resolving, any adverse effects that differences
among state regulatory requirements may produce. If a particular state
insurance regulator's decision conflicts with the majority of other
state regulators, then the affected Participating Insurance Company
will be required to withdraw its separate account investments in the
relevant Fund. This requirement will be provided for in the
Participation Agreement that will be entered into by Participating
Insurance Companies with the relevant Fund.
16. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) give Participating
Insurance Companies the right to disregard the voting instructions of
VLI Contract owners in certain circumstances. This right derives from
the authority of state insurance regulators over VLI Accounts and VA
Accounts. Under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15), a Participating
Insurance Company may disregard VLI Contract owner voting instructions
only with respect to certain specified items. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for divergent judgments as to
the advisability or legality of a change in investment policies,
principal underwriter or investment adviser initiated by such Contract
owners. The potential for disagreement is limited by the requirements
in Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T) that the Participating Insurance Company's
disregard of voting instructions be reasonable and based on specific
good faith determinations.
17. A particular Participating Insurance Company's disregard of
voting instructions, nevertheless, could conflict with the voting
instructions of a majority of VLI Contract owners. The Participating
Insurance Company's action possibly could be different than the
determination of all or some of the other Participating Insurance
Companies (including affiliated insurers) that the voting instructions
of VLI Contract owners should prevail, and either could preclude a
majority vote approving the change or could represent a minority view.
If the Participating Insurance Company's judgment represents a minority
position or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating
Insurance Company may be required, at the relevant Fund's election, to
withdraw its VLI Accounts' and VA Accounts' investments in the relevant
Fund. No charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. This requirement will be provided for in the Participation
Agreement entered into by the Participating Insurance Companies with
the relevant Fund.
18. Applicants argue that there is no reason why the investment
policies of a Fund would or should be materially different from what
these policies would or should be if the Fund supported only VA
Accounts or VLI Accounts supporting flexible premium or scheduled
premium VLI Contracts. Each type of insurance contract is designed as a
long-term investment program.
19. Each Fund will be managed to attempt to achieve its specified
investment objective, and not favor or disfavor any particular
Participating Insurance Company or type of insurance contract. There is
no reason to believe that different features of various types of
Variable Contracts will lead to different investment policies for each
or for different VLI Accounts and VA Accounts. The sale of Variable
Contracts and ultimate success of all VA Accounts and VLI Accounts
depends, at least in part, on satisfactory investment performance,
which provides an incentive for each Participating Insurance Company to
seek optimal investment performance.
20. Furthermore, no single investment strategy can be identified as
appropriate to a particular Variable Contract. Each ``pool'' of VLI
Contract and VA Contract owners is composed of individuals of diverse
financial status, age, insurance needs and investment goals. A Fund
supporting even one type of Variable Contract must accommodate these
diverse factors in order to attract and retain purchasers. Permitting
mixed and shared funding will provide economic support for the
continuation of the Funds. Mixed and shared funding will broaden the
base of potential Variable Contract owner investors, which may
facilitate the establishment of additional Funds serving diverse goals.
21. Applicants do not believe that the sale of the shares to
Qualified Plans, Advisers, and General Accounts will increase the
potential for material irreconcilable conflicts of interest between or
among different types of investors. In particular, Applicants see very
little potential for such conflicts beyond those that would otherwise
exist between owners of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts. Applicants
submit that either there are no conflicts of interest or that there
exists the ability by the affected parties to resolve such conflicts
consistent with the best interests of VLI Contract owners, VA Contract
owners, and Plan participants.
22. Applicants considered whether there are any issues raised under
the Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue Rulings thereunder if VA
Accounts, VLI Accounts, Advisers, General Accounts and Qualified Plans
all invest in the same Fund. However, the Applicants have concluded
that neither the Code, nor the Treasury Regulations nor Revenue Rulings
thereunder, present any inherent conflicts of interest if VA Accounts,
VLI Accounts, Advisers, General Accounts and Qualified Plans all invest
in the same Fund.
23. Applicants note that, while there are differences in the manner
in which distributions from VLI Accounts, VA Accounts, and Plans are
taxed, these differences have no impact on the Funds. When
distributions are to be made, and a VLI Account, VA Account, or Plan is
unable to net purchase payments to make distributions, the VLI Account,
VA Account, or Plan will redeem shares of the relevant Fund at its net
asset value in conformity with Rule 22c-1 under the 1940 Act (without
the imposition of any sales charge) to provide proceeds to meet
distribution needs. A Participating Insurance Company will then make
distributions in accordance with the terms of its Variable Contracts,
and a Plan will then make distributions in accordance with the terms of
the Plan.
24. Applicants considered whether it is possible to provide an
equitable
[[Page 62478]]
means of giving voting rights to all Variable Contract owners,
Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts, and determined that it
is possible. In connection with any meeting of Fund shareholders, the
soliciting Fund will inform each Participating Insurance Company (with
respect to its VLI Accounts, VA Accounts and General Account), Adviser,
and Qualified Plan of its share holdings and provide other information
necessary for such shareholders to participate in the meeting (e.g.,
proxy materials). Each Participating Insurance Company then will
solicit voting instructions from owners of VLI Contracts and VA
Contracts in accordance with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), or Section
12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) of the Act, as applicable, and its Participation
Agreement with the relevant Fund. Shares of a Fund that are held by an
Adviser or a General Account will generally be voted in the same
proportion as all votes cast on behalf of all Variable Contract owners
having voting rights. However, an Adviser or General Account will vote
its shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or
its staff. Shares held by Plans will be voted in accordance with
applicable law. The voting rights provided to Plans with respect to the
shares would be no different from the voting rights that are provided
to Plans with respect to shares of mutual funds sold to the general
public. Furthermore, if a material irreconcilable conflict arises
because of a Plan's decision to disregard Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a minority
position or would preclude a majority vote, the Plan may be required,
at the election of the relevant Fund, to withdraw its investment in the
Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal.
25. Applicants do not believe that the veto power of state
insurance commissioners over certain potential changes to Fund
investment objectives approved by Variable Contract owners creates
conflicts between the interests of such owners and the interests of
Plan participants, Advisers or General Accounts. Applicants note that a
basic premise of corporate democracy and shareholder voting is that not
all shareholders may agree with a particular proposal. Their interests
and opinions may differ, but this does not mean that inherent conflicts
of interest exist between or among such shareholders or that occasional
conflicts of interest that do occur between or among them are likely to
be irreconcilable.
26. Although Participating Insurance Companies may have to overcome
regulatory impediments in redeeming shares of a Fund held by their VLI
and VA Accounts, the Plans and the participants in participant-directed
Plans can make decisions quickly and redeem their shares in a Fund and
reinvest in another investment company or other funding vehicle without
impediments, or as is the case with most Plans, hold cash pending
suitable investment. As a result, conflicts between the interests of
Variable Contract owners and the interests of Plans and Plan
participants can usually be resolved quickly since the Plans can, on
their own, redeem their Fund shares. Advisers and General Accounts can
similarly redeem their shares of a Fund and make alternative
investments at any time.
27. Finally, Applicants considered whether there is a potential for
future conflicts of interest between Participating Insurance Companies
and Plans created by future changes in the tax laws. Applicants do not
see any greater potential for material irreconcilable conflicts arising
between the interests of Variable Contract owners and Plan participants
from future changes in the federal tax laws than that which already
exists between VLI Contract owners and VA Contract owners.
28. Applicants recognize that the foregoing is not an all-inclusive
list, but rather is representative of issues that they believe are
relevant to this application. Applicants believe that the discussion
contained herein demonstrates that the sale of Fund shares to Plans
would not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts
between the interests of Plan participants and Variable Contract owners
or other investors. Further, Applicants submit that the use of the
Funds with respect to Plans is not substantially dissimilar from each
Fund's current and anticipated use, in that Plans, like VLI Accounts
and VA Accounts, are generally long-term investors.
29. Applicants assert that permitting a Fund to sell its shares to
an Adviser or to a General Account will enhance management of each Fund
without raising significant concerns regarding material irreconcilable
conflicts among different types of investors.
30. Various factors have limited the number of insurance companies
that offer Variable Contracts. These factors include the costs of
organizing and operating a funding vehicle, certain insurers' lack of
experience with respect to investment management, and the lack of name
recognition by the public of certain insurance companies as investment
experts. In particular, some smaller life insurance companies may not
find it economically feasible, or within their investment or
administrative expertise, to enter the Variable Contract business on
their own. Use of the Funds as a common investment vehicle for Variable
Contracts would reduce or eliminate these concerns. Mixed and shared
funding should also provide several benefits to owners of Variable
Contracts by eliminating a significant portion of the costs of
establishing and administering separate underlying funds.
31. Applicants state that Participating Insurance Companies will
benefit not only from the investment and administrative expertise of
the Funds' Adviser, but also from the potential cost efficiencies and
investment flexibility afforded by larger pools of funds. Mixed and
shared funding also would permit a greater amount of assets available
for investment by a Fund, thereby promoting economies of scale, by
permitting increased safety through greater diversification, or by
making the addition of new Funds more feasible. Therefore, making the
Funds available for mixed and shared funding will encourage more
insurance companies to offer Variable Contracts. This should result in
increased competition with respect to both Variable Contract design and
pricing, which can in turn be expected to result in more product
variety. Applicants also assert that sale of shares in a Fund to Plans,
in addition to VLI Accounts and VA Accounts, will result in an
increased amount of assets available for investment in a Fund. This may
benefit Variable Contract owners by promoting economies of scale,
permitting increased safety of investments through greater
diversification, and making the addition of new Funds more feasible.
32. Applicants also submit that, regardless of the type of
shareholder in a Fund, an Adviser is or would be contractually and
otherwise obligated to manage the Fund solely and exclusively in
accordance with that Fund's investment objectives, policies and
restrictions, as well as any guidelines established by the applicable
Trust's board of trustees or directors (a ``Board''). Thus, each Fund
will be managed in the same manner as any other mutual fund.
33. Applicants assert that sales of Fund shares, as described
above, will not have any adverse federal income tax
[[Page 62479]]
consequences to other investors in such a Fund.
34. In addition, Applicants note that the Commission has issued
numerous orders permitting mixed funding, extended mixed funding, and
shared funding. Therefore, granting the exemptions requested herein is
in the public interest and, as discussed above, will not compromise the
regulatory purposes of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), or 15(b) of the Act
or Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T) thereunder.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that the Commission order requested herein shall
be subject to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of each Trust will consist of persons
who are not ``interested persons'' of the Trust (``disinterested
directors/trustees''), as defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act,
and the rules thereunder, and as modified by any applicable orders of
the Commission, except that if this condition is not met by reason of
death, disqualification or bona fide resignation of any trustee or
trustees, then the operation of this condition will be suspended: (a)
for a period of 90 days if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled by
the Board, (b) for a period of 150 days if a vote of shareholders is
required to fill the vacancy or vacancies, or (c) for such longer
period as the Commission may prescribe by order upon application or by
future rule.
2. The Board of each Trust will monitor its respective Funds for
the existence of any material irreconcilable conflict between and among
the interests of the owners of all VLI Contracts and VA Contracts and
participants of all Plans investing in the Fund, and determine what
action, if any, should be taken in response to such conflicts. A
material irreconcilable conflict may arise for a variety of reasons,
including: (a) An action by any state insurance regulatory authority;
(b) a change in applicable federal or state insurance, tax, or
securities laws or regulations, or a public ruling, private letter
ruling, no-action or interpretive letter, or any similar action by
insurance, tax or securities regulatory authorities; (c) an
administrative or judicial decision in any relevant proceeding; (d) the
manner in which the investments of the Fund are being managed; (e) a
difference in voting instructions given by VA Contract owners, VLI
Contract owners, and Plans or Plan participants; (f) a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to disregard the voting instructions of
contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a decision by a Plan to
disregard the voting instructions of Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well
as by virtue of any investment of General Account assets in a Fund),
any Adviser to a Fund, and any Plan that executes a Participation
Agreement upon its becoming an owner of 10% or more of the net assets
of a Fund (collectively, ``Participants'') will report any potential or
existing conflicts to the relevant Board. Each Participant will be
responsible for assisting the Board in carrying out the Board's
responsibilities under these conditions by providing the Board with all
information reasonably necessary for the Board to consider any issues
raised. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an
obligation by each Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board
whenever Variable Contract owner voting instructions are disregarded,
and, if pass-through voting is applicable, an obligation by each
trustee for a Plan to inform the Board whenever it has determined to
disregard Plan participant voting instructions. The responsibility to
report such information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, will be
a contractual obligation of all Participating Insurance Companies under
their Participation Agreement with a Trust, and these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to the interests of the Variable
Contract owners. The responsibility to report such information and
conflicts, and to assist the Board, also will be contractual
obligations of all Plans under their Participation Agreement with a
Trust, and such agreements will provide that these responsibilities
will be carried out with a view only to the interests of Plan
participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board of a Trust, or a
majority of the disinterested directors/trustees of the Board, that a
material irreconcilable conflict exists, then the relevant Participant
will, at its expense and to the extent reasonably practicable (as
determined by a majority of the disinterested directors/trustees), take
whatever steps are necessary to remedy or eliminate the material
irreconcilable conflict, up to and including: (a) Withdrawing the
assets allocable to some or all of their VLI Accounts or VA Accounts
from the Fund and reinvesting such assets in a different investment
vehicle including another Fund; (b) in the case of a Participating
Insurance Company, submitting the question as to whether such
segregation should be implemented to a vote of all affected Variable
Contract owners and, as appropriate, segregating the assets of any
appropriate group (i.e., VA Contract owners or VLI Contact owners of
one or more Participating Insurance Companies) that votes in favor of
such segregation, or offering to the affected Contract owners the
option of making such a change; (c) withdrawing the assets allocable to
some or all of the Plans from the affected Fund and reinvesting them in
a different investment medium; and (d) establishing a new registered
management investment company or managed separate account. If a
material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to disregard Variable Contract owner
voting instructions, and that decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating Insurance
Company may be required, at the election of the Trust, to withdraw such
Participating Insurance Company's VA Account and VLI Account
investments in the Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a
result of such withdrawal. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises
because of a Plan's decision to disregard Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a minority
position or would preclude a majority vote, the Plan may be required,
at the election of the Trust, to withdraw its investment in the Fund,
and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. The responsibility to take remedial action in the event of
a Board determination of a material irreconcilable conflict and to bear
the cost of such remedial action will be a contractual obligation of
all Participants under their Participation Agreement with a Trust, and
these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the
interests of Variable Contract owners or, as applicable, Plan
participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested
directors/trustees of the Board of each Trust will determine whether or
not any proposed action adequately remedies any material irreconcilable
conflict, but, in no event, will the Fund or its Adviser be required to
establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract or Plan. No
Participating Insurance Company will be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract if any offer
to do so has been declined by vote of a majority of the Contract owners
materially and adversely affected by the material irreconcilable
conflict. Further, no Plan will be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for the Plan if: (a) A majority of the
Plan
[[Page 62480]]
participants materially and adversely affected by the irreconcilable
material conflict vote to decline such offer, or (b) pursuant to
documents governing the Plan, the Plan trustee makes such decision
without a Plan participant vote.
5. The Board of each Trust's determination of the existence of a
material irreconcilable conflict and its implications will be made
known in writing promptly to all Participants.
6. Participating Insurance Companies will provide pass-through
voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners whose Contracts are
issued through registered VLI Accounts or registered VA Accounts for as
long as required by the Act as interpreted by the Commission. However,
as to Variable Contracts issued through VA Accounts or VLI Accounts not
registered as investment companies under the Act, pass-through voting
privileges will be extended to owners of such Contracts to the extent
granted by the Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, such
Participating Insurance Companies, where applicable, will vote the
shares of each Fund held in their VLI Accounts and VA Accounts in a
manner consistent with voting instructions timely received from
Variable Contract owners. Participating Insurance Companies will be
responsible for assuring that each of their VLI and VA Accounts
investing in a Fund calculates voting privileges in a manner consistent
with all other Participating Insurance Companies investing in that
Fund.
The obligation to calculate voting privileges as provided in this
application shall be a contractual obligation of all Participating
Insurance Companies under their Participation Agreement with the Trust.
Each Participating Insurance Company will vote shares of each Fund held
in its VLI or VA Accounts for which no timely voting instructions are
received, as well as shares held by its General Account or otherwise
attributed to it, in the same proportion as those shares for which
voting instructions are received. Each Plan will vote as required by
applicable law, governing Plan documents and as provided in this
application.
7. As long as the Act requires pass-through voting privileges to be
provided to Variable Contract owners or the Commission interprets the
Act to require the same, a Fund's Adviser or any General Account will
vote their shares of the Fund in the same proportion as all votes cast
on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights;
provided, however, that such an Adviser or General Account shall vote
its shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or
its staff.
8. Each Fund will comply with all provisions of the Act requiring
voting by shareholders (which, for these purposes, shall be the persons
having a voting interest in its shares), and, in particular, the Fund
will either provide for annual meetings (except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret Section 16 of the Act not to require such
meetings) or comply with Section 16(c) of the Act (although each Fund
is not, or will not be, one of those trusts of the type described in
Section 16(c) of the Act), as well as with Section 16(a) of the Act
and, if and when applicable, Section 16(b) of the Act. Further, each
Fund will act in accordance with the Commission's interpretations of
the requirements of Section 16(a) with respect to periodic elections of
directors/trustees and with whatever rules the Commission may
promulgate thereto.
9. A Fund will make its shares available to the VLI Accounts, VA
Accounts, and Plans at or about the time it accepts any seed capital
from its Adviser or from a General Account of a Participating Insurance
Company.
10. Each Fund has notified, or will notify, all Participants that
disclosure regarding potential risks of mixed and shared funding may be
appropriate in VLI Account and VA Account prospectuses or Plan
documents. Each Fund will disclose, in its prospectus that: (a) Shares
of the Fund may be offered to both VA Accounts and VLI Accounts and, if
applicable, to Plans, (b) due to differences in tax treatment and other
considerations, the interests of various Variable Contract owners
participating in the Fund and the interests of Plan Participants
investing in the Fund, if applicable, may conflict, and (c) the Trust's
Board will monitor events in order to identify the existence of any
material irreconcilable conflicts and to determine what action, if any,
should be taken in response to any such conflicts.
11. If and to the extent Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) under the Act
are amended, or proposed Rule 6e-3 under the Act is adopted, to provide
exemptive relief from any provision of the Act, or the rules
thereunder, with respect to mixed or shared funding, on terms and
conditions materially different from any exemptions granted in the
order requested in this application, then each Fund and/or
Participating Insurance Companies, as appropriate, shall take such
steps as may be necessary to comply with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), as
amended, or Rule 6e-3, to the extent such rules are applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually, shall submit to the Board
of each Trust such reports, materials or data as the Board reasonably
may request so that the directors/trustees of the Board may fully carry
out the obligations imposed upon the Board by the conditions contained
in this application. Such reports, materials and data shall be
submitted more frequently if deemed appropriate by the Board of a
Trust. The obligations of the Participants to provide these reports,
materials and data to the Board, when it so reasonably requests, shall
be a contractual obligation of all Participants under their
Participation Agreement with the Trust.
13. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by the
Board of each Trust, and all Board action with regard to determining
the existence of a conflict, notifying Participants of a conflict and
determining whether any proposed action adequately remedies a conflict,
will be properly recorded in the minutes of the Board or other
appropriate records, and such minutes or other records shall be made
available to the Commission upon request.
14. Each Fund will not accept a purchase order from a Plan if such
purchase would make the Plan an owner of 10 percent or more of the net
assets of the Fund unless the Plan executes an agreement with the Fund
governing participation in the Fund that includes the conditions set
forth herein to the extent applicable. A Plan will execute an
application containing an acknowledgement of this condition at the time
of its initial purchase of shares.
Conclusion
For all of the reasons explained above, Applicants submit that the
exemptions requested are appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24684 Filed 10-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P