Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 59498-59500 [2014-23454]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
59498
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Notices
ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN—COMMON DATA PLATFORM CLIENT OUTCOME MEASURES FOR
DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS—Continued
Number of
respondents
SAMHSA program title
Total SAMHSA ......................................................
444,584
Responses
per
respondent
........................
Total number
of responses
833,662
Burden hours
per response
........................
Total burden
hours
389,901
Notes:
1. Screening, Brief Intervention, Treatment and Referral (SBIRT) grant program: The estimated number of respondents is 10% of the total respondents, 742,740.
2. Numbers may not add to the totals due to rounding.
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by November 3, 2014 to the
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2014–23455 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: National System of
Care Expansion Evaluation—NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health
Services (CMHS) is requesting approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the new collection of
data for the National System of Care
(SOC) Expansion Evaluation.
Evaluation Plan and Data Collection
Activities. The purpose of the National
SOC Expansion Evaluation is to assess
the success of the SOC expansion
planning and implementation grants in
expanding the reach of SOC values,
principles, and practices. These include
maximizing system-level coordination
and planning, offering a comprehensive
array of services, and prioritizing family
and youth involvement. In order to
obtain a clear picture of SOC expansion
grant activities, this longitudinal, multilevel evaluation will measure activities
and performance of grantees at three
levels essential to building and
sustaining effective SOCs. The three
levels are: jurisdiction, local system,
and child and family levels.
Data collection activities will occur
through four evaluation components.
Each component includes data
collection activities and analyses
involving similar topics. Each
component has multiple instruments
that will be used to address various
aspects. Thus, there are a total of eight
new instruments that will be used to
conduct this evaluation. All four
evaluation components involve
collecting data from implementation
grantees, but only the Implementation
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assessment includes data collection
from planning grantees as well.
The four studies with their
corresponding data collection activities
are as follows:
(1) The Implementation assessment
will document the development and
expansion of SOCs. Data collection
activities include: (a) Stakeholder
Interviews with high-level
administrators, youth and family
representatives, and child agencies to
describe the early implementation and
expansion efforts of planning and
implementation grants, (b) the webbased Self-Assessment of
Implementation Survey to assess SOC
implementation and expansion at the
jurisdictional level over time, and (c)
the SOC Expansion Assessment
(SOCEA) administered to local
providers, managers, clients, and their
caregivers to measure SOC expansion
strategies and processes implemented
related to direct service delivery at the
local system level. Implementation
grantees will participate in all three of
the Implementation assessment data
collection activities. Planning grantee
participation will be limited to the
Stakeholder Interview and the SelfAssessment of Implementation Survey.
(2) The Network Analysis will use
Network Analysis Surveys to determine
the depth and breadth of the SOC
collaboration across agencies and
organization. Separate network analysis
surveys will be administered at the
jurisdiction and local service system
levels. The Geographic Information
System (GIS) Component will measure
the geographic coverage and spread of
the SOC, including reaching
underserved areas and populations. At
the jurisdictional and local service
system levels, the GIS component will
use office and business addresses of
attendees to key planning,
implementation and expansion events.
At the child/youth and family level,
Census block groups (derived from
home addresses) will be used to depict
the geographic spread of populations
served by SOCs.
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
59499
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Notices
(3) The Financial Mapping
Component involves the review of
implementation grantees’ progress in
developing financial sustainability and
expansion plans. The Financial
Mapping Interview will be conducted
with financial administrators of
Medicaid Agencies, Mental Health
Authorities, mental health provider
trade associations, and family
organizations. The Benchmark
Component will compare relative rates
of access, utilization, and costs for
children’s mental health services using
the Benchmarking Tool and
administrative data requested from
financial administrators and personnel
working with Medicaid Agency and
Mental Health Authority reporting and
payment systems.
(4) The Child and Family Outcome
Component will collect longitudinal
data on child clinical and functional
outcomes, family outcomes, and child
and family background. Data will be
collected at intake, 6-months, and 12months post service entry (as long as the
child/youth is still receiving services).
Data will also be collected at discharge
if the child/youth leaves services before
the 12-month data collection point. Data
will be collected using the following
scales: (a) A shortened version of the
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire, (b) the
Columbia Impairment Scale, (c) the
Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17, (d)
Family/Living Situation items, and (e)
background information gathered
through the Common Data Platform
(CDP). Although OMB approval for the
CPD has been sought separately under
an unrelated contract, this data
collection will include both youth age
11 to 17 and their caregivers whereas
CDP includes only one of these
respondents (i.e., youth or caregiver).
Estimated Burden. Data will be
collected from approximately 56
planning and 107 implementation
grants, 214 local systems within the
implementation grant jurisdictions. Data
collection for this evaluation will be
conducted over a 4-year period.
The average annual respondent
burden estimate reflects the average
number of respondents in each
respondent category, the average
number of responses per respondent per
year, the average length of time it will
take to complete each response, and the
total average annual burden for each
category of respondent for all categories
of respondents combined. Table 1
shows the estimated annual burden
estimate by instrument and respondent.
Burden is summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL BURDEN
Instrument/
data collection activity
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
per
respondent
Total
number of
responses
Hours per
response
Total
annual
burden
hours
Implementation Assessment
Stakeholder Interview a ..
SAIS a .............................
SOCEA ...........................
Project Director ..................................
Family Organization Representative
Youth Organization Representative ..
Core Agency Partners b .....................
Grant leadership ................................
Project Director & Representatives
from Family & Youth Organizations.
Core Agency Rep, Service Providers
Care Coordinators .............................
Caregivers .........................................
Clients 11–21 ....................................
54
54
54
272
815
214
1
1
1
1
1.89
1
870
193
193
193
1
1
1
1
1
1
54
54
54
272
1,540
290
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.82
1.5
72
72
64
272
1,258
435
870
193
193
193
1
1.7
0.75
0.5
1,077
329
214
97
357
713
0.4
0.4
149
297
428
856
0.25
0.25
107
214
Network Analysis Survey
Jurisdiction .....................
Local system ..................
Grant leadership ................................
Local providers of direct services .....
357
713
GIS Component: Group Collaborative Events for GIS Analysis Form
Jurisdiction .....................
Local system ..................
Grant administrator/Project Director ..
Local administrator/Project Director ..
107
214
4
4
Financial Mapping and Benchmark Components
Financial Mapping Interview.
Benchmark Tool .............
Financial administrators at: Medicaid
Agencies & MH Authorities.
Financial administrators at: Trade associations & Family organizations.
Payment/reporting personnel at: .......
Medicaid Agencies & MH Authorities
99
1
99
2.0
221
33
1
33
1.5
53
24
1
24
40.0
960
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Child and Family Outcome Component
Background Information
(CDP) c.
Caregivers of clients age 11–17 d .....
1,283
e 2.12
2,720
0.37
998
Family/Living Information
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire—Short Form.
Columbia Impairment
Scale.
Clients age 11–17 .............................
Caregivers of clients age 5–17 f ........
Clients age 18–21 g ...........................
Caregivers of clients age 5–17 .........
1,283
6,454
1,322
6,454
2.12
2.12
2.12
2.12
2,720
13,683
2,802
13,683
0.37
.05
.05
0.12
998
684
140
1,642
Caregivers of clients age 5–17 .........
6,454
2.12
13,683
0.08
1,095
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
59500
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL BURDEN—Continued
Instrument/
data collection activity
Pediatric Symptom
Checklist—17.
Client record review .......
Responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Total
number of
responses
Hours per
response
Total
annual
burden
hours
Clients age 11–21 h ...........................
Caregivers of clients age 5–17 .........
3,888
6,454
2.12
2.12
8,243
13,683
0.08
0.05
659
684
Clients age 11–21 .............................
Site staff ............................................
3,888
56
2.12
407
8,243
22,794
0.05
0.21
412
4,787
......................
108,477
Total Annual Burden
All ...................................
All .......................................................
14,423
..........................
17,989
a Burden
includes planning and implementation grantees.
agency partners include (1) representatives from MH, child welfare, and juvenile justice and (2) CMHI quality monitors.
clearance sought for CDP is limited to the added burden for a second respondent (Caregiver OR Client age 11 to 17). For clients age
11 to 17, CDP only collects information from either Caregivers OR youth. In addition, clearance is requested for the burden only as OMB approval of CDP has been sought separately.
d Assumes 33% of clients will be age 11 to 17 and that the additional CDP interview for clients age 11 to 17 and their caregiver will be evenly
split between clients and caregivers. Evaluation design requires all participating clients age 5 to 17 to have a caregiver participating in the evaluation.
e Accounts for attrition.
f Assumes 83% of clients will be age 5 to 17.
g Assumes 17% of clients will be age 18 to 21.
h Assumes 50% of clients will be age 11 to 21.
b Core
c OMB
TABLE 2—TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Instrument/data collection activity
Total
number of
responses
Average
annual
burden
(hours)
Stakeholder Interview ..................................................................................................................
SAIS .............................................................................................................................................
SOCEA ........................................................................................................................................
Network analysis survey ..............................................................................................................
GIS ...............................................................................................................................................
Financial mapping interview ........................................................................................................
Benchmark Tool ...........................................................................................................................
Child and family tools (respondent & staff burden) .....................................................................
435
815
1,284
1,070
321
132
24
10,342
435
1,540
1,740
1,070
1,284
132
24
102,253
479
1,258
2,151
446
321
274
960
12,100
Total ......................................................................................................................................
14,423
108,477
17,989
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 2–1057, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857 or email her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
by December 1, 2014.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2014–0046 ]
Summer King,
Statistician.
Agency Information Collection
Activities: DHS OIG Audit of FEMA’s
Assistance to Firefighters Grant
Program, DHS Form 530, DHS Form
531, DHS Form 532
[FR Doc. 2014–23454 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
Office of Inspector General,
Office of Audits, DHS.
ACTION: 60-day notice and request for
comments; new collection, 1601—NEW.
The Department of Homeland
Security, Office of Inspector General,
Office of Audits, will submit the
following Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until December 1,
2014. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2014–0046, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Please follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: dhs.pra@hq.dhs.gov. Please
include docket number DHS–2014–0046
in the subject line of the message.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
information collection is mandatory for
grantees selected in a random sample of
fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2012
Assistance to Firefighter (AFG) grants
and Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Emergency Response (SAFER) grants.
The Department of Homeland
Security’s (DHS) Office of Inspector
General (OIG) is conducting an audit to
determine whether the Federal
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59498-59500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23454]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: National System of Care Expansion Evaluation--NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is requesting
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the new
collection of data for the National System of Care (SOC) Expansion
Evaluation.
Evaluation Plan and Data Collection Activities. The purpose of the
National SOC Expansion Evaluation is to assess the success of the SOC
expansion planning and implementation grants in expanding the reach of
SOC values, principles, and practices. These include maximizing system-
level coordination and planning, offering a comprehensive array of
services, and prioritizing family and youth involvement. In order to
obtain a clear picture of SOC expansion grant activities, this
longitudinal, multi-level evaluation will measure activities and
performance of grantees at three levels essential to building and
sustaining effective SOCs. The three levels are: jurisdiction, local
system, and child and family levels.
Data collection activities will occur through four evaluation
components. Each component includes data collection activities and
analyses involving similar topics. Each component has multiple
instruments that will be used to address various aspects. Thus, there
are a total of eight new instruments that will be used to conduct this
evaluation. All four evaluation components involve collecting data from
implementation grantees, but only the Implementation assessment
includes data collection from planning grantees as well.
The four studies with their corresponding data collection
activities are as follows:
(1) The Implementation assessment will document the development and
expansion of SOCs. Data collection activities include: (a) Stakeholder
Interviews with high-level administrators, youth and family
representatives, and child agencies to describe the early
implementation and expansion efforts of planning and implementation
grants, (b) the web-based Self-Assessment of Implementation Survey to
assess SOC implementation and expansion at the jurisdictional level
over time, and (c) the SOC Expansion Assessment (SOCEA) administered to
local providers, managers, clients, and their caregivers to measure SOC
expansion strategies and processes implemented related to direct
service delivery at the local system level. Implementation grantees
will participate in all three of the Implementation assessment data
collection activities. Planning grantee participation will be limited
to the Stakeholder Interview and the Self-Assessment of Implementation
Survey.
(2) The Network Analysis will use Network Analysis Surveys to
determine the depth and breadth of the SOC collaboration across
agencies and organization. Separate network analysis surveys will be
administered at the jurisdiction and local service system levels. The
Geographic Information System (GIS) Component will measure the
geographic coverage and spread of the SOC, including reaching
underserved areas and populations. At the jurisdictional and local
service system levels, the GIS component will use office and business
addresses of attendees to key planning, implementation and expansion
events. At the child/youth and family level, Census block groups
(derived from home addresses) will be used to depict the geographic
spread of populations served by SOCs.
[[Page 59499]]
(3) The Financial Mapping Component involves the review of
implementation grantees' progress in developing financial
sustainability and expansion plans. The Financial Mapping Interview
will be conducted with financial administrators of Medicaid Agencies,
Mental Health Authorities, mental health provider trade associations,
and family organizations. The Benchmark Component will compare relative
rates of access, utilization, and costs for children's mental health
services using the Benchmarking Tool and administrative data requested
from financial administrators and personnel working with Medicaid
Agency and Mental Health Authority reporting and payment systems.
(4) The Child and Family Outcome Component will collect
longitudinal data on child clinical and functional outcomes, family
outcomes, and child and family background. Data will be collected at
intake, 6-months, and 12-months post service entry (as long as the
child/youth is still receiving services). Data will also be collected
at discharge if the child/youth leaves services before the 12-month
data collection point. Data will be collected using the following
scales: (a) A shortened version of the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire,
(b) the Columbia Impairment Scale, (c) the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-
17, (d) Family/Living Situation items, and (e) background information
gathered through the Common Data Platform (CDP). Although OMB approval
for the CPD has been sought separately under an unrelated contract,
this data collection will include both youth age 11 to 17 and their
caregivers whereas CDP includes only one of these respondents (i.e.,
youth or caregiver).
Estimated Burden. Data will be collected from approximately 56
planning and 107 implementation grants, 214 local systems within the
implementation grant jurisdictions. Data collection for this evaluation
will be conducted over a 4-year period.
The average annual respondent burden estimate reflects the average
number of respondents in each respondent category, the average number
of responses per respondent per year, the average length of time it
will take to complete each response, and the total average annual
burden for each category of respondent for all categories of
respondents combined. Table 1 shows the estimated annual burden
estimate by instrument and respondent. Burden is summarized in Table 2.
Table 1--Estimated Average Annual Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Number of Responses Total Hours per annual
Instrument/ data collection activity Respondent respondents per number of response burden
respondent responses hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation Assessment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stakeholder Interview \a\...................... Project Director................. 54 1 54 1.3 72
Family Organization 54 1 54 1.3 72
Representative.
Youth Organization Representative 54 1 54 1.2 64
Core Agency Partners \b\......... 272 1 272 1.0 272
SAIS \a\....................................... Grant leadership................. 815 1.89 1,540 0.82 1,258
SOCEA.......................................... Project Director & 214 1 290 1.5 435
Representatives from Family &
Youth Organizations.
Core Agency Rep, Service 870 1 870 1 1,077
Providers.
Care Coordinators................ 193 1 193 1.7 329
Caregivers....................... 193 1 193 0.75 214
Clients 11-21.................... 193 1 193 0.5 97
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Analysis Survey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jurisdiction................................... Grant leadership................. 357 1 357 0.4 149
Local system................................... Local providers of direct 713 1 713 0.4 297
services.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GIS Component: Group Collaborative Events for GIS Analysis Form
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jurisdiction................................... Grant administrator/Project 107 4 428 0.25 107
Director.
Local system................................... Local administrator/Project 214 4 856 0.25 214
Director.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Mapping and Benchmark Components
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Mapping Interview.................... Financial administrators at: 99 1 99 2.0 221
Medicaid Agencies & MH
Authorities.
Financial administrators at: 33 1 33 1.5 53
Trade associations & Family
organizations.
Benchmark Tool................................. Payment/reporting personnel at:.. 24 1 24 40.0 960
Medicaid Agencies & MH
Authorities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child and Family Outcome Component
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background Information (CDP) \c\............... Caregivers of clients age 11-17 1,283 \e\ 2.12 2,720 0.37 998
\d\.
Clients age 11-17................ 1,283 2.12 2,720 0.37 998
Family/Living Information...................... Caregivers of clients age 5-17 6,454 2.12 13,683 .05 684
\f\.
Clients age 18-21 \g\............ 1,322 2.12 2,802 .05 140
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire--Short Form..... Caregivers of clients age 5-17... 6,454 2.12 13,683 0.12 1,642
Columbia Impairment Scale...................... Caregivers of clients age 5-17... 6,454 2.12 13,683 0.08 1,095
[[Page 59500]]
Clients age 11-21 \h\............ 3,888 2.12 8,243 0.08 659
Pediatric Symptom Checklist--17................ Caregivers of clients age 5-17... 6,454 2.12 13,683 0.05 684
Clients age 11-21................ 3,888 2.12 8,243 0.05 412
Client record review........................... Site staff....................... 56 407 22,794 0.21 4,787
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All............................................ All.............................. 14,423 ............ 108,477 .............. 17,989
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Burden includes planning and implementation grantees.
\b\ Core agency partners include (1) representatives from MH, child welfare, and juvenile justice and (2) CMHI quality monitors.
\c\ OMB clearance sought for CDP is limited to the added burden for a second respondent (Caregiver OR Client age 11 to 17). For clients age 11 to 17,
CDP only collects information from either Caregivers OR youth. In addition, clearance is requested for the burden only as OMB approval of CDP has been
sought separately.
\d\ Assumes 33% of clients will be age 11 to 17 and that the additional CDP interview for clients age 11 to 17 and their caregiver will be evenly split
between clients and caregivers. Evaluation design requires all participating clients age 5 to 17 to have a caregiver participating in the evaluation.
\e\ Accounts for attrition.
\f\ Assumes 83% of clients will be age 5 to 17.
\g\ Assumes 17% of clients will be age 18 to 21.
\h\ Assumes 50% of clients will be age 11 to 21.
Table 2--Total Estimated Annual Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Instrument/data collection activity Number of Total number annual burden
respondents of responses (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stakeholder Interview........................................... 435 435 479
SAIS............................................................ 815 1,540 1,258
SOCEA........................................................... 1,284 1,740 2,151
Network analysis survey......................................... 1,070 1,070 446
GIS............................................................. 321 1,284 321
Financial mapping interview..................................... 132 132 274
Benchmark Tool.................................................. 24 24 960
Child and family tools (respondent & staff burden).............. 10,342 102,253 12,100
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 14,423 108,477 17,989
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 2-
1057, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 or email her a copy at
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received by
December 1, 2014.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2014-23454 Filed 10-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
