Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 58739-58740 [2014-23281]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301
so that, rather than providing general
time limits, there are specific time limits
based on the type of factual information
being submitted. These modifications
are effective for all segments initiated on
or after May 10, 2013. Please review the
final rule, available at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to
submitting factual information in this
segment.
Any party submitting factual
information in an antidumping duty or
countervailing duty proceeding must
certify to the accuracy and completeness
of that information.5 Parties are hereby
reminded that revised certification
requirements are in effect for company/
government officials as well as their
representatives. Ongoing segments of
any antidumping duty or countervailing
duty proceedings initiated on or after
March 14, 2011 should use the formats
for the revised certifications provided at
the end of the Interim Final Rule.6 All
segments of any antidumping duty or
countervailing duty proceedings
initiated on or after August 16, 2013,
should use the formats for the revised
certifications provided at the end of the
Final Rule.7 The Department intends to
reject factual submissions in any
proceeding segments if the submitting
party does not comply with applicable
revised certification requirements.
Revised Extension of Time Limits
Regulation
On September 20, 2013, the
Department modified its regulation
concerning the extension of time limits
for submissions in antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings: Final
Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013).
The modification clarifies that parties
may request an extension of time limits
5 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final
Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim
Final Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and
(2); Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration during Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Supplemental
Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 54697 (September 2,
2011).
7 See Certification of Factual Information To
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently
asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
before a time limit established under
Part 351 expires, or as otherwise
specified by the Secretary. In general, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after the time limit
established under Part 351 expires. For
submissions which are due from
multiple parties simultaneously, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on
the due date. Examples include, but are
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309;
(2) factual information to value factors
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure
the adequacy of remuneration under 19
CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal,
clarification and correction filed
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3)
comments concerning the selection of a
surrogate country and surrogate values
and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
data; and (5) quantity and value
questionnaires. Under certain
circumstances, the Department may
elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be
considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties
simultaneously. In such a case, the
Department will inform parties in the
letter or memorandum setting forth the
deadline (including a specified time) by
which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. This
modification also requires that an
extension request must be made in a
separate, stand-alone submission, and
clarifies the circumstances under which
the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time
limits. These modifications are effective
for all segments initiated on or after
October 21, 2013. Please review the
final rule, available at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/
html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting factual information in these
segments.
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: September 22, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–23290 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58739
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective date: September 30,
2014.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
1823, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 1, 2014, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register a notice of
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ of the antidumping duty order
on drawn stainless steel sinks from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the
period of review (POR) of October 4,
2012, through March 31, 2014.1 The
Department received a timely request
from the petitioner, Elkay
Manufacturing Company, to conduct an
administrative review of Foshan
Success Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Foshan
Success), an exporter of drawn stainless
steel sinks from the PRC.2 Between
April 16 and April 30, 2014, Feidong
Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Feidong),
Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
(Zhaoshun), Guangdong Dongyuan
Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd.
(Dongyuan), Guangdong New Shichu
Import and Export Company Limited
(New Shichu), Guangdong Yingao
Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (Yingao),
Shunde Native Produce Import and
Export Co., Ltd. of Guangdong (Shunde
Native Produce), Yuyao Afa
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Yuyao),
Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise
Development Corporation Limited
(Newecan), Zhongshan Silk Imp. & Exp.
Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong
(Zhongshan Silk), and Zhongshan
Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte),
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 18260
(April 1, 2014).
2 See Letter from the petitioner to the Secretary
of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From
The People’s Republic Of China: Request For
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
58740
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices
each filed timely requests for review.3
Additionally, on April 30, 2014, the
Department received a timely request
from Hajoca Corporation (Hajoca), a
United States importer of the subject
merchandise, to conduct a review of its
entries of the subject merchandise
during the POR produced and exported
by Yingao.4
On May 29, 2014, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on drawn stainless steel sinks from the
PRC with respect to the above-named
companies.5
On August 27, 2014, the petitioner
timely withdrew its request for review
of Foshan Success.6
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if a party who requested the review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review. We
received the petitioner’s withdrawal
request within the 90-day deadline.
Therefore, in response to the
withdrawal request and pursuant to 19
3 See Letter from Zhaoshun and Superte to the
Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel
Sinks from China; Administrative Review Request,’’
dated April 16, 2014; Letter from Newecan to the
Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel
Sinks from China; Administrative Review Request,’’
dated April 21, 2014; Letter from Yuyao to the
Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel
Sinks from the People’s Republic of China: Review
Request,’’ dated April 21, 2014; Letter from New
Shichu to the Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 28, 2014; Letter from Zhongshan Silk to the
Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel
Sinks from the People’s Republic of China Request
for Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2014;
Letter from Shunde Native Produce to the Secretary
of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from
the People’s Republic of China Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2014;
Letter from Yingao to the Secretary of Commerce,
‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s
Republic of China Request for Administrative
Review,’’ dated April 30, 2014; Letter from
Dongyuan to the Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 30, 2014; and Letter from Feidong to the
Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Administrative Review
Request Concerning Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from China,’’ dated April 28, 2014.
4 See Letter from Hajoca to the Secretary of
Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China: Hajoca Corporation’s
Request For Review,’’ dated April 30, 2014.
5 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
30809 (May 29, 2014). (Notice of Initiation)
6 See Letter from the petitioner to the Secretary
of Commerce, ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From
The People’s Republic Of China: Withdrawal Of
Request For Administrative Review,’’ dated August
27, 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding
this administrative review with regard
to Foshan Success. The instant review
will continue with respect to Dongyuan,
Feidong, Newecan, New Shichu,
Shunde Native Produce, Superte,
Yingao, Yuyao, Zhaoshun, and
Zhongshan Silk.7
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the company for
which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). As the company for
which this review is rescinded is also
subject to an ongoing new shipper
review of the antidumping duty order
on drawn stainless steel sinks from the
PRC covering the period October 4,
2012, through October 14, 2013, the
Department’s assessment instructions as
a result of this rescission will only cover
the period October 15, 2013, through
March 31, 2014. The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as the only
reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
7 On August 27 and August 28, 2014, Zhongshan
Silk submitted withdrawals of its request for review
through the Department’s electronic filing system
IA ACCESS. The filings, however, were rejected
because they were submitted under an incorrect
case number and segment date/POR, respectively.
Zhongshan Silk was notified of the rejections and
advised to refile its review request withdrawal, but,
as of the date of this notice, has not done so. See
Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Zhongshan Silk Imp. &
Exp. Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong’s Submission of
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’
dated September 10, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751 and
777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: September 24, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–23281 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 15, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published its initiation
and preliminary results of a changed
circumstances review 1 of the
antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on
multilayered wood flooring (‘‘MLWF’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’).2 The Department preliminarily
determined that Linyi Youyou Wood
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Youyou’’) is the successor-ininterest to Shanghai Lizhong Wood
Products Co., Ltd./The Lizhong Industry
Limited Company of Shanghai
(‘‘Lizhong’’) for purposes of the
antidumping duty order on multilayered
wood flooring from the PRC and, as
such, is entitled to Lizhong’s cash
deposit rate with respect to entries of
subject merchandise. We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. As no parties
AGENCY:
1 See Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s
Republic of China, 79 FR 48117 (August 15, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 (December
8, 2011) (‘‘Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58739-58740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective date: September 30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 or (202) 482-1823, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 1, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register a notice of ``Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order on drawn
stainless steel sinks from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the
period of review (POR) of October 4, 2012, through March 31, 2014.\1\
The Department received a timely request from the petitioner, Elkay
Manufacturing Company, to conduct an administrative review of Foshan
Success Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Foshan Success), an exporter of drawn
stainless steel sinks from the PRC.\2\ Between April 16 and April 30,
2014, Feidong Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Feidong), Foshan Zhaoshun
Trade Co., Ltd. (Zhaoshun), Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial
Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan), Guangdong New Shichu Import and Export Company
Limited (New Shichu), Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd.
(Yingao), Shunde Native Produce Import and Export Co., Ltd. of
Guangdong (Shunde Native Produce), Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
(Yuyao), Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation Limited
(Newecan), Zhongshan Silk Imp. & Exp. Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong
(Zhongshan Silk), and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
(Superte),
[[Page 58740]]
each filed timely requests for review.\3\ Additionally, on April 30,
2014, the Department received a timely request from Hajoca Corporation
(Hajoca), a United States importer of the subject merchandise, to
conduct a review of its entries of the subject merchandise during the
POR produced and exported by Yingao.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 79 FR 18260 (April 1, 2014).
\2\ See Letter from the petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce,
``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From The People's Republic Of China:
Request For Administrative Review,'' dated April 30, 2014.
\3\ See Letter from Zhaoshun and Superte to the Secretary of
Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from China; Administrative
Review Request,'' dated April 16, 2014; Letter from Newecan to the
Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from China;
Administrative Review Request,'' dated April 21, 2014; Letter from
Yuyao to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People's Republic of China: Review Request,'' dated April
21, 2014; Letter from New Shichu to the Secretary of Commerce,
``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China
Request for Administrative Review,'' dated April 28, 2014; Letter
from Zhongshan Silk to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless
Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated April 30, 2014; Letter from Shunde
Native Produce to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless Steel
Sinks from the People's Republic of China Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated April 30, 2014; Letter from Yingao to the Secretary
of Commerce, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's
Republic of China Request for Administrative Review,'' dated April
30, 2014; Letter from Dongyuan to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China Request
for Administrative Review,'' dated April 30, 2014; and Letter from
Feidong to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Administrative Review
Request Concerning Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from China,'' dated
April 28, 2014.
\4\ See Letter from Hajoca to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Hajoca
Corporation's Request For Review,'' dated April 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 29, 2014, the Department published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks from the PRC with respect to
the above-named companies.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 30809 (May 29, 2014). (Notice of
Initiation)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 27, 2014, the petitioner timely withdrew its request for
review of Foshan Success.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Letter from the petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce,
``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From The People's Republic Of China:
Withdrawal Of Request For Administrative Review,'' dated August 27,
2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. We
received the petitioner's withdrawal request within the 90-day
deadline. Therefore, in response to the withdrawal request and pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review
with regard to Foshan Success. The instant review will continue with
respect to Dongyuan, Feidong, Newecan, New Shichu, Shunde Native
Produce, Superte, Yingao, Yuyao, Zhaoshun, and Zhongshan Silk.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ On August 27 and August 28, 2014, Zhongshan Silk submitted
withdrawals of its request for review through the Department's
electronic filing system IA ACCESS. The filings, however, were
rejected because they were submitted under an incorrect case number
and segment date/POR, respectively. Zhongshan Silk was notified of
the rejections and advised to refile its review request withdrawal,
but, as of the date of this notice, has not done so. See Memorandum
to the File, ``Zhongshan Silk Imp. & Exp. Group Co., Ltd. of
Guangdong's Submission of Withdrawal of Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated September 10, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For the
company for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be
assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). As the company
for which this review is rescinded is also subject to an ongoing new
shipper review of the antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel
sinks from the PRC covering the period October 4, 2012, through October
14, 2013, the Department's assessment instructions as a result of this
rescission will only cover the period October 15, 2013, through March
31, 2014. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751
and 777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: September 24, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-23281 Filed 9-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
