Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission's Determination To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement and Issuance of a Consent Order; Issuance of a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation, 58804-58805 [2014-23184]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
58804
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave. NW., MS 130–SIB,
Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202)
208–7411.
meeting. A telephone device for the
hearing impaired (TDD) is available at
(916) 978–5608.
Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 13, 2014.
Pablo R Arroyave,
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–23234 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1SS08011000SX066A00067F134S1
80110; S2D2SS08011000SX066A00033F1
3XS501520]
Action Subject to Intergovernmental
Review
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
are notifying the public that we intend
to grant funds to eligible applicants for
purposes authorized under the
Abandoned Mine Land (AML)
Reclamation Program. Additionally we
are notifying the public that we intend
to grant funds to eligible applicants for
regulating coal mining within their
jurisdictional borders. We will award
these grants during fiscal year 2015.
DATES: A state single point of contact
and other interested state or local
entities may submit written comments
regarding AML and regulatory funding
by December 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic mail: Send your
comments to jbautista@osmre.gov.
• Mail, hand-delivery, or courier:
Send your comments to Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, Administrative Record,
Room 252–SIB, 1951 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jay Bautista, Office of Surface Mining
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: September 22, 2014.
Joseph G. Pizarchik,
Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2014–23168 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
Grant Notification
We are notifying the public that we
intend to grant funds to eligible
applicants for purposes authorized
under the Abandoned Mine Land (AML)
Reclamation Program. Additionally we
are notifying the public that we intend
to grant funds to eligible applicants for
regulating coal mining within their
jurisdictional borders. We will award
these grants during fiscal year 2015.
Eligible applicants are those states and
tribes with a regulatory program or
reclamation plan approved under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA), 30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq., and the State of
Tennessee. Under Executive Order
(E.O.) 12372, we must provide state and
tribal officials the opportunity to review
and comment on proposed federal
financial assistance activities. Of the
eligible applicants, nineteen states and
tribes do not have single points-ofcontact under the E.O.12372 review
process; therefore, we are required to
publish this notice as an alternate
means of notification.
Description of the AML Program
SMCRA established the Abandoned
Mine Reclamation Fund to receive the
AML fees used to finance reclamation of
AML coal mine sites. Grants to eligible
states and tribes are funded from
permanent (mandatory) appropriations.
Recipients use these funds to reclaim
the highest priority AML coal mine sites
that were left abandoned prior to the
enactment of SMCRA in 1977, eligible
non-coal sites, and for non-reclamation
projects.
Description of the Regulatory Program
Title VII of SMCRA authorizes us to
provide grants to states and Indian
tribes to develop, administer, and
enforce state regulatory programs
addressing surface coal mining
operations. Title V and Title VII
authorize states and tribes to develop
regulatory programs pursuant to
SMCRA and, upon approval of
regulatory programs, to assume
regulatory primacy and act as the
regulatory authority, and to administer
and enforce their respective approved
SMCRA regulatory programs. Our
regulations at 30 CFR Chapter VII
implement the provisions of SMCRA.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–904]
Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic
Article Surveillance Systems,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same; Commission’s
Determination To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the
Investigation Based on a Settlement
Agreement and Issuance of a Consent
Order; Issuance of a Consent Order;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
the presiding administrative law judge’s
(‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 13) terminating the
investigation based on settlement and
issuance of a consent order. On review,
the Commission modifies the ID by
revising the proposed consent order to
be in compliance with the
Commission’s rules, issues the revised
consent order, and terminates the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices
on January 15, 2014, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Tyco Fire
& Security GmbH of Switzerland;
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC of Boca
Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated
Security, LLC of Boca Raton, Florida
(collectively ‘‘Complainants’’). 79 FR
2692–93 (Jan. 15, 2014). The complaint
alleged violations of Section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale within the United
States after importation of certain
acousto-magnetic electronic article
surveillance systems, components
thereof, and products containing same
by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent
No. 5,729,200 and U.S. Patent No.
6,181,245. The notice of investigation
named Ningbo Signatronic
Technologies, Ltd., of Ningbo, China;
All-Tag Security Americas, Inc., of Boca
Raton, Florida; All-Tag Security Hong
Kong Co., Ltd. of Tsuen Wan N.T., Hong
Kong; All-Tag Europe SPRL of Brussels,
Belgium; All-Tag Security UK, Ltd. of
Cheshire, United Kingdom; Best
Security Industries of Delray Beach,
Florida; and Signatronic Corporation of
Boca Raton, Florida as respondents
(collectively ‘‘Respondents’’). The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’)
was also named as a party to the
investigation.
On August 11, 2014, Complainants
and Respondents filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation based upon
a settlement agreement, a consent order
stipulation and a proposed consent
order. The moving parties represented
that there are no other agreements,
written or oral, express or implied
between them concerning the subject
matter of this investigation other than
the consent order stipulation, settlement
agreement and consent order. The
moving parties provided public versions
of the settlement agreement. OUII filed
a response stating that it did not oppose
the motion.
On August 25, 2014, the ALJ granted
the motion for termination of the
investigation. The ALJ found that the
consent order stipulation complied with
the Commission’s rules but made no
such finding as to the proposed consent
order. The ALJ also found that there was
no evidence that terminating the
investigation based on settlement and
consent order would be contrary to the
public interest. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined to
review the subject ID. Commission Rule
210.21(c)(4) states in part that ‘‘[t]he
Commission will not issue consent
orders with terms beyond those
provided for in this section. . . .’’ The
Commission finds that the parties’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Sep 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
proposed consent order includes not
only the provisions specified in Rule
210.21(c)(4), but also includes
additional terms from the consent order
stipulation. On review, the Commission
revises the proposed consent order to
bring it into compliance with the
Commission’s rules, issues the revised
consent order, and terminates the
investigation. The settlement agreement
and consent order resolve all claims
asserted in the investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–23184 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
58805
and Ping Identity, Denver, CO, have
been added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and AllSeen
Alliance intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On January 29, 2014, AllSeen
Alliance filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The
Department of Justice published a notice
in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 4, 2014
(79 FR 12223).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 26, 2014. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on July 23, 2014 (79 FR 42817).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–23144 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—AllSeen Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 2, 2014, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
AllSeen Alliance, Inc. (‘‘AllSeen
Alliance’’) has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Shanghai Fortune
Techgroup Co., Ltd., Xuhui District,
Shanghai, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; Vedams, Inc., San Jose, CA;
Legrand France, Limoges, FRANCE;
Microsoft Corporation, Redmond WA;
Grid2Home, San Diego, CA; FreeWings
Technologies Co., Ltd.; Yingzhou
District, Ningbo, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA; MachineShop, Inc., Boston,
MA; ControlBEAM Digital Automation,
Irvine, CA; Cloud of Things, Givat
Brenner, ISRAEL; Revolv Inc., Boulder,
CO; Shaspa GmbH, Boeblingen,
GERMANY; Electrolux Home Products,
Inc., Charlotte, NC; ISI Technology,
Charleston, SC; Tellient, San Diego, CA;
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Cooperative Research
Group on ROS-Industrial ConsortiumAmericas
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 4, 2014, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Southwest Research Institute—
Cooperative Research Group on ROSIndustrial Consortium-Americas (‘‘RICAmericas’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL;
Flextronics, San Jose, CA; and Siemens
Corporation, Berkeley, CA, have been
added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and RIC-Americas
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58804-58805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23184]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-904]
Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems,
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission's
Determination To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the
Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement and Issuance of a Consent
Order; Issuance of a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review the presiding administrative law
judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 13)
terminating the investigation based on settlement and issuance of a
consent order. On review, the Commission modifies the ID by revising
the proposed consent order to be in compliance with the Commission's
rules, issues the revised consent order, and terminates the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
[[Page 58805]]
on January 15, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Tyco Fire
& Security GmbH of Switzerland; Sensormatic Electronics, LLC of Boca
Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated Security, LLC of Boca Raton,
Florida (collectively ``Complainants''). 79 FR 2692-93 (Jan. 15, 2014).
The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale within the United States after importation of
certain acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems,
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,729,200 and U.S. Patent No.
6,181,245. The notice of investigation named Ningbo Signatronic
Technologies, Ltd., of Ningbo, China; All-Tag Security Americas, Inc.,
of Boca Raton, Florida; All-Tag Security Hong Kong Co., Ltd. of Tsuen
Wan N.T., Hong Kong; All-Tag Europe SPRL of Brussels, Belgium; All-Tag
Security UK, Ltd. of Cheshire, United Kingdom; Best Security Industries
of Delray Beach, Florida; and Signatronic Corporation of Boca Raton,
Florida as respondents (collectively ``Respondents''). The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') was also named as a party to
the investigation.
On August 11, 2014, Complainants and Respondents filed a joint
motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement
agreement, a consent order stipulation and a proposed consent order.
The moving parties represented that there are no other agreements,
written or oral, express or implied between them concerning the subject
matter of this investigation other than the consent order stipulation,
settlement agreement and consent order. The moving parties provided
public versions of the settlement agreement. OUII filed a response
stating that it did not oppose the motion.
On August 25, 2014, the ALJ granted the motion for termination of
the investigation. The ALJ found that the consent order stipulation
complied with the Commission's rules but made no such finding as to the
proposed consent order. The ALJ also found that there was no evidence
that terminating the investigation based on settlement and consent
order would be contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined to review the subject ID. Commission
Rule 210.21(c)(4) states in part that ``[t]he Commission will not issue
consent orders with terms beyond those provided for in this section. .
. .'' The Commission finds that the parties' proposed consent order
includes not only the provisions specified in Rule 210.21(c)(4), but
also includes additional terms from the consent order stipulation. On
review, the Commission revises the proposed consent order to bring it
into compliance with the Commission's rules, issues the revised consent
order, and terminates the investigation. The settlement agreement and
consent order resolve all claims asserted in the investigation.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-23184 Filed 9-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
