Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission's Determination To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement and Issuance of a Consent Order; Issuance of a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation, 58804-58805 [2014-23184]

Download as PDF 58804 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave. NW., MS 130–SIB, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202) 208–7411. meeting. A telephone device for the hearing impaired (TDD) is available at (916) 978–5608. Public Disclosure Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: August 13, 2014. Pablo R Arroyave, Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. 2014–23234 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement [S1D1SS08011000SX066A00067F134S1 80110; S2D2SS08011000SX066A00033F1 3XS501520] Action Subject to Intergovernmental Review Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, are notifying the public that we intend to grant funds to eligible applicants for purposes authorized under the Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Reclamation Program. Additionally we are notifying the public that we intend to grant funds to eligible applicants for regulating coal mining within their jurisdictional borders. We will award these grants during fiscal year 2015. DATES: A state single point of contact and other interested state or local entities may submit written comments regarding AML and regulatory funding by December 31, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • Electronic mail: Send your comments to jbautista@osmre.gov. • Mail, hand-delivery, or courier: Send your comments to Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Administrative Record, Room 252–SIB, 1951 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20240. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jay Bautista, Office of Surface Mining tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Sep 29, 2014 Jkt 232001 Dated: September 22, 2014. Joseph G. Pizarchik, Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2014–23168 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P Grant Notification We are notifying the public that we intend to grant funds to eligible applicants for purposes authorized under the Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Reclamation Program. Additionally we are notifying the public that we intend to grant funds to eligible applicants for regulating coal mining within their jurisdictional borders. We will award these grants during fiscal year 2015. Eligible applicants are those states and tribes with a regulatory program or reclamation plan approved under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA), 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq., and the State of Tennessee. Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12372, we must provide state and tribal officials the opportunity to review and comment on proposed federal financial assistance activities. Of the eligible applicants, nineteen states and tribes do not have single points-ofcontact under the E.O.12372 review process; therefore, we are required to publish this notice as an alternate means of notification. Description of the AML Program SMCRA established the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund to receive the AML fees used to finance reclamation of AML coal mine sites. Grants to eligible states and tribes are funded from permanent (mandatory) appropriations. Recipients use these funds to reclaim the highest priority AML coal mine sites that were left abandoned prior to the enactment of SMCRA in 1977, eligible non-coal sites, and for non-reclamation projects. Description of the Regulatory Program Title VII of SMCRA authorizes us to provide grants to states and Indian tribes to develop, administer, and enforce state regulatory programs addressing surface coal mining operations. Title V and Title VII authorize states and tribes to develop regulatory programs pursuant to SMCRA and, upon approval of regulatory programs, to assume regulatory primacy and act as the regulatory authority, and to administer and enforce their respective approved SMCRA regulatory programs. Our regulations at 30 CFR Chapter VII implement the provisions of SMCRA. PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–904] Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission’s Determination To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement and Issuance of a Consent Order; Issuance of a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 13) terminating the investigation based on settlement and issuance of a consent order. On review, the Commission modifies the ID by revising the proposed consent order to be in compliance with the Commission’s rules, issues the revised consent order, and terminates the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM 30SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2014 / Notices on January 15, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Tyco Fire & Security GmbH of Switzerland; Sensormatic Electronics, LLC of Boca Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated Security, LLC of Boca Raton, Florida (collectively ‘‘Complainants’’). 79 FR 2692–93 (Jan. 15, 2014). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,729,200 and U.S. Patent No. 6,181,245. The notice of investigation named Ningbo Signatronic Technologies, Ltd., of Ningbo, China; All-Tag Security Americas, Inc., of Boca Raton, Florida; All-Tag Security Hong Kong Co., Ltd. of Tsuen Wan N.T., Hong Kong; All-Tag Europe SPRL of Brussels, Belgium; All-Tag Security UK, Ltd. of Cheshire, United Kingdom; Best Security Industries of Delray Beach, Florida; and Signatronic Corporation of Boca Raton, Florida as respondents (collectively ‘‘Respondents’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named as a party to the investigation. On August 11, 2014, Complainants and Respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement agreement, a consent order stipulation and a proposed consent order. The moving parties represented that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between them concerning the subject matter of this investigation other than the consent order stipulation, settlement agreement and consent order. The moving parties provided public versions of the settlement agreement. OUII filed a response stating that it did not oppose the motion. On August 25, 2014, the ALJ granted the motion for termination of the investigation. The ALJ found that the consent order stipulation complied with the Commission’s rules but made no such finding as to the proposed consent order. The ALJ also found that there was no evidence that terminating the investigation based on settlement and consent order would be contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined to review the subject ID. Commission Rule 210.21(c)(4) states in part that ‘‘[t]he Commission will not issue consent orders with terms beyond those provided for in this section. . . .’’ The Commission finds that the parties’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Sep 29, 2014 Jkt 232001 proposed consent order includes not only the provisions specified in Rule 210.21(c)(4), but also includes additional terms from the consent order stipulation. On review, the Commission revises the proposed consent order to bring it into compliance with the Commission’s rules, issues the revised consent order, and terminates the investigation. The settlement agreement and consent order resolve all claims asserted in the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 24, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–23184 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 58805 and Ping Identity, Denver, CO, have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AllSeen Alliance intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On January 29, 2014, AllSeen Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 4, 2014 (79 FR 12223). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 26, 2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2014 (79 FR 42817). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2014–23144 Filed 9–29–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—AllSeen Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on September 2, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), AllSeen Alliance, Inc. (‘‘AllSeen Alliance’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Shanghai Fortune Techgroup Co., Ltd., Xuhui District, Shanghai, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Vedams, Inc., San Jose, CA; Legrand France, Limoges, FRANCE; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond WA; Grid2Home, San Diego, CA; FreeWings Technologies Co., Ltd.; Yingzhou District, Ningbo, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; MachineShop, Inc., Boston, MA; ControlBEAM Digital Automation, Irvine, CA; Cloud of Things, Givat Brenner, ISRAEL; Revolv Inc., Boulder, CO; Shaspa GmbH, Boeblingen, GERMANY; Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Charlotte, NC; ISI Technology, Charleston, SC; Tellient, San Diego, CA; PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial ConsortiumAmericas Notice is hereby given that, on September 4, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research Institute— Cooperative Research Group on ROSIndustrial Consortium-Americas (‘‘RICAmericas’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL; Flextronics, San Jose, CA; and Siemens Corporation, Berkeley, CA, have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and RIC-Americas intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM 30SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58804-58805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23184]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-904]


Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems, 
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission's 
Determination To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement and Issuance of a Consent 
Order; Issuance of a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review the presiding administrative law 
judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 13) 
terminating the investigation based on settlement and issuance of a 
consent order. On review, the Commission modifies the ID by revising 
the proposed consent order to be in compliance with the Commission's 
rules, issues the revised consent order, and terminates the 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation

[[Page 58805]]

on January 15, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Tyco Fire 
& Security GmbH of Switzerland; Sensormatic Electronics, LLC of Boca 
Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated Security, LLC of Boca Raton, 
Florida (collectively ``Complainants''). 79 FR 2692-93 (Jan. 15, 2014). 
The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, 
importation, or sale within the United States after importation of 
certain acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, 
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of 
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,729,200 and U.S. Patent No. 
6,181,245. The notice of investigation named Ningbo Signatronic 
Technologies, Ltd., of Ningbo, China; All-Tag Security Americas, Inc., 
of Boca Raton, Florida; All-Tag Security Hong Kong Co., Ltd. of Tsuen 
Wan N.T., Hong Kong; All-Tag Europe SPRL of Brussels, Belgium; All-Tag 
Security UK, Ltd. of Cheshire, United Kingdom; Best Security Industries 
of Delray Beach, Florida; and Signatronic Corporation of Boca Raton, 
Florida as respondents (collectively ``Respondents''). The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') was also named as a party to 
the investigation.
    On August 11, 2014, Complainants and Respondents filed a joint 
motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement 
agreement, a consent order stipulation and a proposed consent order. 
The moving parties represented that there are no other agreements, 
written or oral, express or implied between them concerning the subject 
matter of this investigation other than the consent order stipulation, 
settlement agreement and consent order. The moving parties provided 
public versions of the settlement agreement. OUII filed a response 
stating that it did not oppose the motion.
    On August 25, 2014, the ALJ granted the motion for termination of 
the investigation. The ALJ found that the consent order stipulation 
complied with the Commission's rules but made no such finding as to the 
proposed consent order. The ALJ also found that there was no evidence 
that terminating the investigation based on settlement and consent 
order would be contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review 
were filed.
    The Commission has determined to review the subject ID. Commission 
Rule 210.21(c)(4) states in part that ``[t]he Commission will not issue 
consent orders with terms beyond those provided for in this section. . 
. .'' The Commission finds that the parties' proposed consent order 
includes not only the provisions specified in Rule 210.21(c)(4), but 
also includes additional terms from the consent order stipulation. On 
review, the Commission revises the proposed consent order to bring it 
into compliance with the Commission's rules, issues the revised consent 
order, and terminates the investigation. The settlement agreement and 
consent order resolve all claims asserted in the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
Part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-23184 Filed 9-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P