Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation, 58382-58383 [2014-23094]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 58382 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Notices 395–5806 or via email to OIRAl Submission@omb.eop.gov. Also, please send a copy of your comments to John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203—SIB, Washington, DC 20240, or electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. Please refer to OMB Control Number 1029–0054 in your correspondence. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To receive a copy of the information collection request contact John Trelease at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at jtrelease@osmre.gov. You may also review this collection request by going to http://www.reginfo.gov (Information Collection Review, Currently Under Review, Agency is Department of the Interior, DOI–OSMRE). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has submitted a request to OMB to renew its approval of the collection of information contained in 30 CFR part 872— Abandoned mine reclamation funds. OSM is requesting a 3-year term of approval for each information collection activity. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 1029–0054 and is codified at 30 CFR 872.10. Regulatory authorities are required to respond to this collection to obtain a benefit. As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a Federal Register notice soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on June 24, 2014 (79 FR 35794). No comments were received. This notice provides the public with an additional 30 days in which to comment on the following information collection activity: Title: 30 CFR 872—Abandoned mine reclamation funds. OMB Control Number: 1029–0054. Summary: 30 CFR 872 establishes a procedure whereby States and Indian tribes submit written statements announcing the State’s/Tribe’s decision not to submit reclamation plans and, therefore, not be granted AML funds. Bureau Form Number: None. Frequency of Collection: Once. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Sep 26, 2014 Jkt 232001 Description of Respondents: State and Tribal abandoned mine land reclamation agencies. Total Annual Responses: 1. Total Annual Burden Hours: 1. Total Annual Non-Wage Costs: $0. Send comments on the need for the collection of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and ways to minimize the information collection burden on respondents, such as use of automated means of collection of the information, to the addresses listed under ADDRESSES. Please refer to the appropriate OMB control number 1029– 0054 in your correspondence. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: September 19, 2014. Harry J. Payne, Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 2014–23169 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–931] Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,761 (‘‘the ‘761 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,948,705 (‘‘the ‘705 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,254,052 (‘‘the ‘052 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,437,103 (‘‘the ‘103 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,542,457 (‘‘the ‘457 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. AGENCY: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2014). Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 22, 2014, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Advanced Research Corporation of White Bear Lake, Minnesota. A supplement to the complaint was filed on September 8, 2014. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain formatted magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 23, 2014, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain formatted magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–12 of the ‘761 patent; claims 1–5 and 9 of the ‘705 patent; claims 1, 2, 4–9, U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Notices 11–15, 17, and 18 of the ‘052 patent; claims 1–6 of the ‘103 patent; and claims 1–6 and 10–12 of the ‘457 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Advanced Research Corporation, 4459 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, MN 55110. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: International Business Machines Corp., New Orchard Road, Armonk, NY 10504. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7–3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052, Japan. Fujifilm Corporation, 7–3, Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107– 0052, Japan. Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Sep 26, 2014 Jkt 232001 Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 24, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–23094 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—The Open Group, L.L.C. Notice is hereby given that, on September 8, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The Open Group, L.L.C. (‘‘TOG’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Adservio, Paris, FRANCE; aicas GmbH, Karlsruhe, GERMANY; 24 Learning Beijing Hua Fang Ji Ye Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; bitil.com, Avellino, ITALY; Central Bank of Republic of Turkey, Ankara, TURKEY; ECIS Consultants Limited, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM; Enterprise Architects LTD, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Firebrand Training Limited, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Fujitsu Limited, Chiyoda-ku, JAPAN; Gelder Gringas and Associates, Ottawa, CANADA; Maryville Data Systems, Inc., St. Louis, MO; SE7Ti Servicos de ¸ Tecnologia da Informacao, Rio de ¸˜ Janeiro, BRAZIL; Sierra Nevada Corporation, Sparks, NV; Silosmashers, Inc., Fairfax, VA, Technology Service PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58383 Corporation, Turnbull, CT; Tonex, Inc., Dallas, TX; and Visual Paradigm, Kowloon, HONG KONG–CHINA, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, 1Plug Corporation, Alameda, CA; Baker Hughes, Sugar Land, TX; Dirogsa, Lima, PERU; EA Fellows ApS, Dragor, DENMARK; Enterprise Architecture Consulting Ltd, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM; Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd., London, UNITED KINGDOM; Gobuchi, Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES; Litmus Group (Pty) Ltd, Sydney, AUSTRALIA; Net Security Training Ltd, Wembley, UNITED KINGDOM; Novay, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS; Raymond James, St. Petersburg, FL; Standard Insurance Company, Portland, OR; and VisioTech Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Bahawalpur, PAKISTAN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and TOG intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On April 21, 1997, TOG filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 1997 (62 FR 32371). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 16, 2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 3, 2014 (79 FR 38071). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2014–23146 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance; Correction Employment and Training Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice; correction. AGENCY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) published in the Federal Register on Thursday, September 11, 2014, an announcement of investigation regarding eligibility to apply for workers adjustment assistance (Vol. 79, No. 176, page 54291, see http://www.gpo.gov/ fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-09-11/pdf/2014- SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58382-58383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23094]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-931]


Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges 
Containing the Same Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 22, 2014, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Advanced Research Corporation of White Bear Lake, Minnesota. A 
supplement to the complaint was filed on September 8, 2014. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain formatted magnetic data 
storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,761 (``the `761 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,948,705 (``the `705 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 8,254,052 (``the `052 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,437,103 (``the 
`103 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,542,457 (``the `457 patent''). 
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States 
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2014).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on September 23, 2014, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain formatted 
magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by 
reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-12 of the `761 
patent; claims 1-5 and 9 of the `705 patent; claims 1, 2, 4-9,

[[Page 58383]]

11-15, 17, and 18 of the `052 patent; claims 1-6 of the `103 patent; 
and claims 1-6 and 10-12 of the `457 patent, and whether an industry in 
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337;
    (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), 
(f)(1), (g)(1);
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:
Advanced Research Corporation, 4459 White Bear Parkway, White Bear 
Lake, MN 55110.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

International Business Machines Corp., New Orchard Road, Armonk, NY 
10504.
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 
107-0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Corporation, 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052, 
Japan.
Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-23094 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P