Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Institution of Investigation, 58382-58383 [2014-23094]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58382
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Notices
395–5806 or via email to OIRAl
Submission@omb.eop.gov. Also, please
send a copy of your comments to John
Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203—SIB,
Washington, DC 20240, or electronically
to jtrelease@osmre.gov. Please refer to
OMB Control Number 1029–0054 in
your correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at
jtrelease@osmre.gov. You may also
review this collection request by going
to https://www.reginfo.gov (Information
Collection Review, Currently Under
Review, Agency is Department of the
Interior, DOI–OSMRE).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has
submitted a request to OMB to renew its
approval of the collection of information
contained in 30 CFR part 872—
Abandoned mine reclamation funds.
OSM is requesting a 3-year term of
approval for each information collection
activity.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection is 1029–0054
and is codified at 30 CFR 872.10.
Regulatory authorities are required to
respond to this collection to obtain a
benefit.
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a
Federal Register notice soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on June 24,
2014 (79 FR 35794). No comments were
received. This notice provides the
public with an additional 30 days in
which to comment on the following
information collection activity:
Title: 30 CFR 872—Abandoned mine
reclamation funds.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0054.
Summary: 30 CFR 872 establishes a
procedure whereby States and Indian
tribes submit written statements
announcing the State’s/Tribe’s decision
not to submit reclamation plans and,
therefore, not be granted AML funds.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Description of Respondents: State and
Tribal abandoned mine land
reclamation agencies.
Total Annual Responses: 1.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 1.
Total Annual Non-Wage Costs: $0.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collection of the
information, to the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to the
appropriate OMB control number 1029–
0054 in your correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: September 19, 2014.
Harry J. Payne,
Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2014–23169 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–931]
Certain Formatted Magnetic Data
Storage Tapes and Cartridges
Containing the Same Institution of
Investigation
by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,761
(‘‘the ‘761 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,948,705 (‘‘the ‘705 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 8,254,052 (‘‘the ‘052 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 8,437,103 (‘‘the ‘103
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,542,457
(‘‘the ‘457 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
AGENCY:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2014).
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 22, 2014, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Advanced
Research Corporation of White Bear
Lake, Minnesota. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on September 8,
2014. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain formatted magnetic data storage
tapes and cartridges containing the same
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 23, 2014, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain formatted
magnetic data storage tapes and
cartridges containing the same by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims
1–12 of the ‘761 patent; claims 1–5 and
9 of the ‘705 patent; claims 1, 2, 4–9,
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 2014 / Notices
11–15, 17, and 18 of the ‘052 patent;
claims 1–6 of the ‘103 patent; and
claims 1–6 and 10–12 of the ‘457 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Advanced Research Corporation, 4459
White Bear Parkway, White Bear
Lake, MN 55110.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
International Business Machines Corp.,
New Orchard Road, Armonk, NY
10504.
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7–3,
Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 107–0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Corporation, 7–3, Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–
0052, Japan.
Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle
Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA
94065.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–23094 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—The Open Group, L.L.C.
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 8, 2014, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The
Open Group, L.L.C. (‘‘TOG’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Specifically, Adservio, Paris,
FRANCE; aicas GmbH, Karlsruhe,
GERMANY; 24 Learning Beijing Hua
Fang Ji Ye Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
bitil.com, Avellino, ITALY; Central
Bank of Republic of Turkey, Ankara,
TURKEY; ECIS Consultants Limited,
Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM; Enterprise
Architects LTD, London, UNITED
KINGDOM; Firebrand Training Limited,
London, UNITED KINGDOM; Fujitsu
Limited, Chiyoda-ku, JAPAN; Gelder
Gringas and Associates, Ottawa,
CANADA; Maryville Data Systems, Inc.,
St. Louis, MO; SE7Ti Servicos de
¸
Tecnologia da Informacao, Rio de
¸˜
Janeiro, BRAZIL; Sierra Nevada
Corporation, Sparks, NV; Silosmashers,
Inc., Fairfax, VA, Technology Service
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58383
Corporation, Turnbull, CT; Tonex, Inc.,
Dallas, TX; and Visual Paradigm,
Kowloon, HONG KONG–CHINA, have
been added as parties to this venture.
Also, 1Plug Corporation, Alameda,
CA; Baker Hughes, Sugar Land, TX;
Dirogsa, Lima, PERU; EA Fellows ApS,
Dragor, DENMARK; Enterprise
Architecture Consulting Ltd, Oxford,
UNITED KINGDOM; Enterprise
Architecture Solutions Ltd., London,
UNITED KINGDOM; Gobuchi, Dubai,
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES; Litmus
Group (Pty) Ltd, Sydney, AUSTRALIA;
Net Security Training Ltd, Wembley,
UNITED KINGDOM; Novay, Enschede,
THE NETHERLANDS; Raymond James,
St. Petersburg, FL; Standard Insurance
Company, Portland, OR; and VisioTech
Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Bahawalpur,
PAKISTAN, have withdrawn as parties
to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and TOG intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 21, 1997, TOG filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 13, 1997 (62 FR 32371).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 16, 2014. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on July 3, 2014 (79 FR 38071).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–23146 Filed 9–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance; Correction
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
The Employment and
Training Administration (ETA)
published in the Federal Register on
Thursday, September 11, 2014, an
announcement of investigation
regarding eligibility to apply for workers
adjustment assistance (Vol. 79, No. 176,
page 54291, see https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-09-11/pdf/2014-
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58382-58383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23094]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-931]
Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges
Containing the Same Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 22, 2014, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Advanced Research Corporation of White Bear Lake, Minnesota. A
supplement to the complaint was filed on September 8, 2014. The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain formatted magnetic data
storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,761 (``the `761
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,948,705 (``the `705 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 8,254,052 (``the `052 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,437,103 (``the
`103 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,542,457 (``the `457 patent'').
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2014).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 23, 2014, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain formatted
magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by
reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-12 of the `761
patent; claims 1-5 and 9 of the `705 patent; claims 1, 2, 4-9,
[[Page 58383]]
11-15, 17, and 18 of the `052 patent; claims 1-6 of the `103 patent;
and claims 1-6 and 10-12 of the `457 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Advanced Research Corporation, 4459 White Bear Parkway, White Bear
Lake, MN 55110.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
International Business Machines Corp., New Orchard Road, Armonk, NY
10504.
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo
107-0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Corporation, 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052,
Japan.
Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-23094 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P