Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.100(a) To Correct Potential Ambiguities Introduced in Prior Rule Change Filings Submitted in 2013 and 2014, 57601-57603 [2014-22788]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 / Notices
the continued appropriateness for the
Regulated Fund of participating in new
and existing Co-Investment
Transactions.
10. Each Regulated Fund will
maintain the records required by section
57(f)(3) of the Act as if each of the
Regulated Funds were a BDC and each
of the investments permitted under
these conditions were approved by the
Required Majority under section 57(f) of
the Act.
11. No Non-Interested Director of a
Regulated Fund will also be a director,
general partner, managing member or
principal, or otherwise an ‘‘affiliated
person’’ (as defined in the Act) of a
Affiliated Private Fund.
12. The expenses, if any, associated
with acquiring, holding or disposing of
any securities acquired in a CoInvestment Transaction (including,
without limitation, the expenses of the
distribution of any such securities
registered for sale under the Securities
Act) will, to the extent not payable by
the Advisers under their respective
investment advisory agreements with
the Affiliated Private Funds and the
Regulated Funds, be shared by the
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Private
Funds in proportion to the relative
amounts of the securities held or to be
acquired or disposed of, as the case may
be.
13. Any transaction fee (including
break-up or commitment fees but
excluding broker’s fees contemplated by
section 17(e) or 57(k) of the Act, as
applicable) received in connection with
a Co-Investment Transaction will be
distributed to the participating
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Private
Funds on a pro rata basis based on the
amounts they invested or committed, as
the case may be, in such Co-Investment
Transaction. If any transaction fee is to
be held by an Adviser pending
consummation of the transaction, the
fee will be deposited into an account
maintained by such Adviser at a bank or
banks having the qualifications
prescribed in section 26(a)(1) of the Act,
and the account will earn a competitive
rate of interest that will also be divided
pro rata among the participating
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Private
Funds based on the amounts they invest
in such Co-Investment Transaction.
None of the Affiliated Private Funds, the
Advisers, the other Regulated Funds or
any affiliated person of the Regulated
Funds or Affiliated Private Funds will
receive additional compensation or
remuneration of any kind as a result of
or in connection with a Co-Investment
Transaction (other than (a) in the case
of the Regulated Funds and the
Affiliated Private Funds, the pro rata
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
transaction fees described above and
fees or other compensation described in
condition 2(c)(iii)(C); and (b) in the case
of an Adviser, investment advisory fees
paid in accordance with the agreement
between the Adviser and the Regulated
Fund or Affiliated Private Fund).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–22792 Filed 9–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73151; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–106]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 2.100(a) To Correct
Potential Ambiguities Introduced in
Prior Rule Change Filings Submitted in
2013 and 2014
September 19, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on
September 15, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.100(a) to
correct potential ambiguities introduced
in prior rule change filings submitted in
2013 and 2014. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57601
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.100(a) to
correct potential ambiguities introduced
in prior rule change filings submitted in
2013 and 2014. More specifically, as a
result of overlapping amendments in
2013 and 2014, potential ambiguity as to
the approved text of Rule 2.100(a) of the
rule was introduced, as discussed in
greater detail below. In order to
establish the approved text definitively,
the Exchange accordingly proposes to
amend existing Rule 2.100(a)(2)(A).
On June 14, 2013, the Exchange filed
a proposed rule change relating to the
acquisition by IntercontinentalExchange
Group, Inc. (now known as
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. or
‘‘ICE’’) of the Exchange’s indirect parent
company, NYSE Euronext (the ‘‘June
2013 Rule Change’’).4 The June 2013
Rule Change included non-substantive
amendments to Rule 2.100(a)(3)(ii) to
replace two references to NYSE
Euronext with references to
IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.,
which would be the new public holding
company above NYSE Euronext. No
other amendments to Rule 2.100(a) were
proposed. The Commission approved
the June 2013 Rule Change on August
15, 2013.5 However, the June 2013 Rule
Change by its terms did not become
operative until the closing of ICE’s
acquisition of NYSE Euronext, which
occurred on November 13, 2013.
On July 22, 2013, after publication of
notice of the June 2013 Rule Change but
prior to issuance of the approval order,
the Exchange filed an additional
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69850
(June 25, 2013), 78 FR 39352 (July 1, 2013) (SR–
NYSEArca–2013–62) (notice).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70210
(Aug. 15, 2013), 78 FR 51758 (Aug. 21, 2013) (SR–
NYSEArca–2013–62) (approval order).
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
57602
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
proposed rule change that made
substantive changes to Rule 2.100 to
better delineate the self-regulatory
organization functions of the Exchange
and affiliated exchanges during an
emergency condition, reflect the
operational preferences of the industry,
reflect the current structure of market
participant connectivity to and system
coding for exchange systems, and add
NYSE MKT LLC as an affiliated
exchange (the ‘‘July 2013 Rule
Change’’).6 As part of the July 2013 Rule
Change, the Exchange renumbered Rule
2.100(a), and moved the text previously
found in Rule 2.100(a)(3)(ii) to new
paragraph Rule 2.100(a)(2)(A). The
renumbering of former Rule
2.100(a)(3)(ii) did not include any
substantive changes to that rule text.
The July 2013 Rule Change was
approved and effective on November 6,
2013.7
Because the July 2013 Rule Change
was effective prior to the operative date
of the June 2013 Rule Change, it did not
reflect the change from NYSE Euronext
to IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.
made in the June 2013 Rule Change. In
addition, the June 2013 Rule Change
was not amended after effectiveness of
the July 2013 Rule Change to conform
the unamended rule text. As a result,
when ICE’s acquisition of NYSE
Euronext closed on November 13, 2013
and the June 2013 Rule Change was
intended to take effect, the text of Rule
2.100(a) in Exhibit 5 to the rule filing
(i.e. the text before the proposed
amendment) did not correspond with
the text as recently amended by the July
2013 Rule Change. However, when the
changes associated with the June 2013
Rule Change were made to Rule 2.100(a)
on the Exchange’s Web site, the change
from NYSE Euronext to
IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.
was made, even though the rule text
appeared under new rule numbering.
In a further proposed rule change
filed on May 5, 2014, the Exchange
proposed to amend Rule 2.100(a) to
reflect the change of name from
IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. to
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘May 2014 Rule Change’’).8 The base
text of Rule 2.100(a) in this filing did
not reflect the renumbering of the rule
text in the July 2013 Rule Change, but
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70097
(Aug. 2, 2013), 78 FR 48528 (Aug. 8, 2013) (SR–
NYSEArca–2013–77) (notice).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70822
(Nov. 6, 2013), 78 FR 68128 (Nov. 13, 2013) (SR–
NYSEArca–2013–77) (approval order).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72157
(May 13, 2014), 79 FR 28792 (May 19, 2014) (SR–
NYSEArca–2014–52) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
did reflect the June 2013 Rule Change.9
The May 2014 Rule Change was
effective, and designated operative,
upon filing.
As a consequence of this series of
overlapping rule change filings, there is
potential ambiguity as to whether the
assumption by officers of ICE in 2013 of
the roles formerly assigned to officers of
NYSE Euronext, and the subsequent
change in ICE’s name in 2014, are
accurately reflected in Rule 2.100(a).
The Exchange believes there is no
ambiguity as to the intent of any of the
rule change filings or as to the intended
text of Rule 2.100(a) as there were no
substantive changes made in the July
2013 Rule Change to Rule 2.100(a)(3),
only a renumbering of paragraphs.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
amend the version of Rule 2.100(a) as it
currently appears on the Exchange’s
Web site, to replace the reference to
IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.,
with the correct reference to
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., as
provided for in the May 2014 Rule
Change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),10 in general,
and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,11 in
particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change removes
impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market by
clarifying rule text to reflect the correct
corporate entity, as intended in the May
2014 Rule Change.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
9 Exhibit 5 to the May 2014 Rule Change included
the text of a Rule 2.100(a)(1) as part of such exhibit,
but did not propose any changes to that provision.
The base text of Rule 2.100(a)(1) in Exhibit 5 to the
May 2014 Rule Change did not reflect the changes
made in the July 2013 Rule Change, which became
effective on November 6, 2013. However, the
changes to Rule 2.100(a)(1) made in the July 2013
Rule Change are correctly reflected on the
Exchange’s Web site and the Exhibit 5 to this filing.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address any competitive issues and
relates to non-substantive clarifications
of one rule .only
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.13
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 14 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 15 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, as it will allow the
Exchange to correct any ambiguity as to
its current rule created by its prior rule
filings, which were either previously
approved by the Commission or
effective on filing.16 For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
16 See supra notes 4–8.
13 17
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 / Notices
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–106 and should be
submitted on or before October 16,
2014.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–106 on the subject
line.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
rule change to be operative upon
filing.17
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2014–106.
This file number should be included on
the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review
your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the
Commission’s Internet Web site (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of
the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2014–22788 Filed 9–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–73150; File No. SR–CHX–
2014–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt the
CHX Routing Services
September 19, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on
September 8, 2014, the Chicago Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CHX proposes to adopt and amend
rules to implement the CHX Routing
Services. The text of this proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at (www.chx.com) and in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CHX included statements concerning
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57603
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule changes and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
CHX has prepared summaries, set forth
in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Changes
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt and
amend rules to implement the proposed
CHX Routing Services. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to permit Routable
Orders 4 to be routed away from the
CHX Matching System (‘‘Matching
System’’) for executions at away Trading
Centers (‘‘routing destination’’),5 if a
Routing Event 6 is triggered. The
proposed CHX Routing Services would
be provided through CHXBD, LLC
(‘‘CHXBD’’), which is an affiliated
broker-dealer that will operate as a
facility of the Exchange. All orders
routed away from, and related
executions within, the Matching System
would be done in a manner compliant
with Exchange rules and federal
securities laws and regulations,
including Regulation NMS and
Regulation SHO. Incidentally, the
Exchange also proposes to amend the
operation of certain order modifiers and
price sliding functionalities that will be
impacted by the proposed CHX Routing
Services, including the CHX Only and
LULD Price Sliding functionalities and
Do Not Display modifier, and clarify
how orders are ranked, displayed and
executed by the Matching System.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed CHX Routing Services and
related amendments will benefit market
participants by providing a routing
functionality that would increase the
likelihood of executions resulting from
Routable Orders submitted to the
Matching System. Consequently, the
proposed CHX Routing Services and
4 As discussed below, proposed Article 1, Rule
1(oo) defines ‘‘Routable Order’’ as ‘‘any incoming
Limit order, as defined under Article 1, Rule 2(a)(1),
of any size, not marked by any order modifiers or
related terms listed under Article 1, Rule 2 that
prohibit the routing of the order to another Trading
Center.’’ By definition, orders resting on the CHX
book are never routable.
5 Proposed Article 1, Rule 1(nn) defines ‘‘Trading
Center’’ as it is defined under Rule 600(b)(78) under
Regulation NMS.
6 As discussed below, proposed Article 19, Rule
3(a) lists three Routing Events, any of which may
cause an order to be routed away pursuant to the
proposed CHX Routing Services.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57601-57603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73151; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2014-106]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 2.100(a) To Correct Potential Ambiguities Introduced in
Prior Rule Change Filings Submitted in 2013 and 2014
September 19, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on September 15, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.100(a) to
correct potential ambiguities introduced in prior rule change filings
submitted in 2013 and 2014. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.100(a) to
correct potential ambiguities introduced in prior rule change filings
submitted in 2013 and 2014. More specifically, as a result of
overlapping amendments in 2013 and 2014, potential ambiguity as to the
approved text of Rule 2.100(a) of the rule was introduced, as discussed
in greater detail below. In order to establish the approved text
definitively, the Exchange accordingly proposes to amend existing Rule
2.100(a)(2)(A).
On June 14, 2013, the Exchange filed a proposed rule change
relating to the acquisition by IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.
(now known as Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. or ``ICE'') of the
Exchange's indirect parent company, NYSE Euronext (the ``June 2013 Rule
Change'').\4\ The June 2013 Rule Change included non-substantive
amendments to Rule 2.100(a)(3)(ii) to replace two references to NYSE
Euronext with references to IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc., which
would be the new public holding company above NYSE Euronext. No other
amendments to Rule 2.100(a) were proposed. The Commission approved the
June 2013 Rule Change on August 15, 2013.\5\ However, the June 2013
Rule Change by its terms did not become operative until the closing of
ICE's acquisition of NYSE Euronext, which occurred on November 13,
2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69850 (June 25,
2013), 78 FR 39352 (July 1, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-62) (notice).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70210 (Aug. 15,
2013), 78 FR 51758 (Aug. 21, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-62) (approval
order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2013, after publication of notice of the June 2013 Rule
Change but prior to issuance of the approval order, the Exchange filed
an additional
[[Page 57602]]
proposed rule change that made substantive changes to Rule 2.100 to
better delineate the self-regulatory organization functions of the
Exchange and affiliated exchanges during an emergency condition,
reflect the operational preferences of the industry, reflect the
current structure of market participant connectivity to and system
coding for exchange systems, and add NYSE MKT LLC as an affiliated
exchange (the ``July 2013 Rule Change'').\6\ As part of the July 2013
Rule Change, the Exchange renumbered Rule 2.100(a), and moved the text
previously found in Rule 2.100(a)(3)(ii) to new paragraph Rule
2.100(a)(2)(A). The renumbering of former Rule 2.100(a)(3)(ii) did not
include any substantive changes to that rule text. The July 2013 Rule
Change was approved and effective on November 6, 2013.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70097 (Aug. 2,
2013), 78 FR 48528 (Aug. 8, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-77) (notice).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70822 (Nov. 6,
2013), 78 FR 68128 (Nov. 13, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-77) (approval
order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the July 2013 Rule Change was effective prior to the
operative date of the June 2013 Rule Change, it did not reflect the
change from NYSE Euronext to IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. made
in the June 2013 Rule Change. In addition, the June 2013 Rule Change
was not amended after effectiveness of the July 2013 Rule Change to
conform the unamended rule text. As a result, when ICE's acquisition of
NYSE Euronext closed on November 13, 2013 and the June 2013 Rule Change
was intended to take effect, the text of Rule 2.100(a) in Exhibit 5 to
the rule filing (i.e. the text before the proposed amendment) did not
correspond with the text as recently amended by the July 2013 Rule
Change. However, when the changes associated with the June 2013 Rule
Change were made to Rule 2.100(a) on the Exchange's Web site, the
change from NYSE Euronext to IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. was
made, even though the rule text appeared under new rule numbering.
In a further proposed rule change filed on May 5, 2014, the
Exchange proposed to amend Rule 2.100(a) to reflect the change of name
from IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. to Intercontinental Exchange,
Inc. (the ``May 2014 Rule Change'').\8\ The base text of Rule 2.100(a)
in this filing did not reflect the renumbering of the rule text in the
July 2013 Rule Change, but did reflect the June 2013 Rule Change.\9\
The May 2014 Rule Change was effective, and designated operative, upon
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72157 (May 13,
2014), 79 FR 28792 (May 19, 2014) (SR-NYSEArca-2014-52) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness).
\9\ Exhibit 5 to the May 2014 Rule Change included the text of a
Rule 2.100(a)(1) as part of such exhibit, but did not propose any
changes to that provision. The base text of Rule 2.100(a)(1) in
Exhibit 5 to the May 2014 Rule Change did not reflect the changes
made in the July 2013 Rule Change, which became effective on
November 6, 2013. However, the changes to Rule 2.100(a)(1) made in
the July 2013 Rule Change are correctly reflected on the Exchange's
Web site and the Exhibit 5 to this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a consequence of this series of overlapping rule change filings,
there is potential ambiguity as to whether the assumption by officers
of ICE in 2013 of the roles formerly assigned to officers of NYSE
Euronext, and the subsequent change in ICE's name in 2014, are
accurately reflected in Rule 2.100(a). The Exchange believes there is
no ambiguity as to the intent of any of the rule change filings or as
to the intended text of Rule 2.100(a) as there were no substantive
changes made in the July 2013 Rule Change to Rule 2.100(a)(3), only a
renumbering of paragraphs. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend
the version of Rule 2.100(a) as it currently appears on the Exchange's
Web site, to replace the reference to IntercontinentalExchange Group,
Inc., with the correct reference to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., as
provided for in the May 2014 Rule Change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\10\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open
market by clarifying rule text to reflect the correct corporate entity,
as intended in the May 2014 Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address any competitive issues and relates to non-
substantive clarifications of one rule only.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \15\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest, as it will allow the
Exchange to correct any ambiguity as to its current rule created by its
prior rule filings, which were either previously approved by the
Commission or effective on filing.\16\ For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposed
[[Page 57603]]
rule change to be operative upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\16\ See supra notes 4-8.
\17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-106 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-106. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-106 and should
be submitted on or before October 16, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22788 Filed 9-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P