Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 57118-57120 [2014-22630]

Download as PDF 57118 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, driver’s license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their visit. Information is also available on the Institute’s/Center’s home page: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when available. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: September 18, 2014. Michelle Trout, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–22661 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P Dated: September 17, 2014. Melanie J. Gray, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES [FR Doc. 2014–22659 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] National Institutes of Health BILLING CODE 4140–01–P National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed Meetings asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings. The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Anesthesiology and Mechanisms of Pain Program Project Review. Date: October 24, 2014. Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3An.18K, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3An.18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–594–3907, pikbr@mail.nih.gov. Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Support of Competitive Research (SCORE). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Sep 23, 2014 Date: October 30, 2014. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, Bethesda, MD 20814. Contact Person: Nina Sidorova, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3An.22, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–594–3663, sidorova@ nigms.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS). Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. Project: Multi-Site Evaluation of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) State Program—NEW The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will conduct the multi-site evaluation of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) state program. The data collected through the multi-site evaluation addresses three study components: (1) The planning, collaboration, and partnership study; (2) the implementation study; and (3) the workforce study. The SS/HS state program funded grantees in seven states beginning in September 2013. Data will be collected from state/tribal administrators, Local Education Authorities (LEAs)/Districts, PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 local program staff (e.g., school resource officers, teachers and administrators, and psychologists) and program partners (e.g., parents, representatives from the juvenile justice and mental health providers). Data collection activities will include key informant interviews, and webbased surveys. The instruments to be used for data collection are as follows: Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study • State Key Informant Interview Protocol • District Key Informant Interview Protocol • State Collaborator Survey • District Collaborator Survey • State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument • District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument Implementation Study • State & District Key Informant Interview Protocol • School-Level Survey Workforce Study • No additional instruments will be used for this study. Data will be gathered from the Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study and the Implementation Study. A summary table of the number of respondents and respondent burden has also been included. Data Collection Activities for MSE Grantees Data for all instruments will be collected annually with the exception of data for the state and District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument which will be collected quarterly. State Key Informant Interview (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The key informant interview protocol will collect information on the service model, partnerships and interagency collaboration, program implementation fidelity, plan deviations, and state and local policy development at the state level. Interviews will also include questions to learn about opportunities that were provided for workforce training. Responses will be compared over time to assess positive development of the program model, emerging barriers and facilitators to implementation, and evolving solutions. On average, 14 state administrators will be interviewed annually and the duration of the interview is estimated to be one hour. E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM 24SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices District Key Informant Interview (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The purpose of these interviews is to identify, through the perspectives of LEA administrators and program partners their descriptions of SS/HS program activities. In particular, the degree to which critical SS/HS framework elements are operationalized, as well as the degree to which principles and strategies are acknowledged and integrated as part of the service processes. Topics include the provider’s approach to service provision (sensitivity to health disparities, cultural competence), the coordination of services across the LEA and other local agencies, training of mental health workers, local policy and protocol development, and barriers/ facilitators at the local level that influence the adoption, integration, and sustainability of SS/HS principles. Responses will be compared over time to assess positive development of the program model. It is anticipated that an average of 63 district administrators and program partners will participate in the interview each year and the interviews will be about one hour in duration. State Collaborator Survey (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The state administrator’s survey will seek to understand the level of interprofessional collaboration among entities working at the state level to promote expanded school mental health. The survey will also capture perceptions of partnership functioning in terms of partner goals, resources, culture and values, and roles and responsibilities, as well as leadership and collaboration among partners as they impact (1) school and community partner engagement, (2) facilitators, (3) barriers, (4) shared decision-making, (5) partnership structure, and (6) sustainability. An average of 208 state administrators and program partners will complete the survey annually and it is estimated that completion will take 30 minutes. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES District Collaborator Survey (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The state administrator’s survey will seek to understand the level of interprofessional collaboration among entities working at the district level to promote expanded school mental health. The survey will also capture perceptions of partnership functioning in terms of partner goals, resources, culture and values, and roles and responsibilities, as well as leadership and collaboration among partners as VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Sep 23, 2014 Jkt 232001 they impact (1) school and community partner engagement, (2) facilitators, (3) barriers, (4) shared decision-making, (5) partnership structure, and (6) sustainability. An average of 624 LEA district administrators and program partners will complete the survey annually and the time for completion is estimated to be 45 minutes. State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument will gather data about the program activities that occur at the state level. By tracking these activities, it will be possible to determine the frequency with which administrators engage in SS/HS program related activities such as holding meetings, the number of persons who attend such meetings, whether and the frequency with which trainings and other support activities occur as well as the participants in such trainings. The instrument will also track whether and what type of resources are leveraged by program partners at the state level. One instrument will be completed by each state and it is estimated that it will take on average 1.5 hours to gather the data and complete the instrument. District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study) The District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument will gather data about the program activities that occur at the LEA/district level. By tracking these activities, it will be possible to determine the frequency with which LEA administrators and program partners at the district level hold meetings, the number of persons who attend such meetings, whether and the frequency with which trainings and other support activities occur, and the participants in such trainings. The instrument will also track whether and what type of resources are leveraged by program partners at the district level. One instrument will be completed by each of the 21 LEAs and it is estimated that it will take on average 1.5 hours to gather the data and complete the instrument. State and District Key Informant Interview (Implementation Study) The State and District Key Informant Interviews will be held with administrators and program partners at the state and LEA districts. The interviews will seek to gain an understanding of respondents’ perspectives as these relate to the degree to which critical SS/HS framework PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57119 elements are operationalized, as well as the degree to which mental health principles and strategies are acknowledged and integrated as part of the service processes. The interviews will also seek to gain an understanding of the types of services and supports that have been implemented as a result of the SS/HS program, children’s access to mental health services, and the facilitators and barriers to program implementation. Interviews will also include questions to learn about the role workforce development opportunities played in program implementation. A total of 56 persons will be interviewed: 14 at the state/tribal level and 42 at the district level. Interviews will take on average one hour to complete. School-Level Survey (Implementation Study): The school-level survey will be completed by persons who work within the schools that are participating in the SS/HS state program. The survey combines items from three surveys: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) assesses mental health and social service provider attitudes toward adopting evidence-based practices. The Mental Health Service Integration Survey (MHSIS) assesses professional school mental health roles, service integration, and barriers and facilitators of mental health service integration in schools. The School Mental Health Quality Assessment Questionnaire (SMHQAQ) is a 40 item instrument divided into 10 domains that assess the integration of school mental health services delivered in schools. The 10 domains related to the 10 principles of expanded school mental health include: (1) Access to care; (2) Needs assessment; (3) Evidence-based practices; (4) Stakeholder involvement and feedback; (5) Quality assessment and improvement; (6) Continuum of care and referral processes; (7) Clinician training, support, and service delivery; (8) Competently addressing developmental, cultural, and personal differences; (9) Interdisciplinary collaboration and communication; and (10) Community coordination. The School Mental Health Capacity Instrument is a 27-item scale that assesses the capacity of schools to address the mental health needs of students. The schools can be rated along a continuum using the three individual subscales of intervention, early recognition & referral, or prevention & promotion. In addition, the total sum of all three scales provides an overall measure of capacity. The intervention subscale looks at training, protocols, and the designation of specific followup procedures for children referred for E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM 24SEN1 57120 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices mental health services. Early recognition and referral covers universal screenings for potential problems, and communication between staff members to discuss students who may be experiencing mental health concerns. Finally, prevention and promotion looks at the efforts focused on student’s social-emotional development. A total of 2,100 persons will be invited to complete the survey annually and it is estimated that completion of the survey will take on average 25 minutes. Internet-based technology will be used for collecting data via Web-based surveys, and for data entry and management. The average annual respondent burden is estimated below. TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN Type of respondents Number of respondents Instrument Responses per respondent Average hours per respondent Total annual hour burden Planning, Collaboration & Participation Study Key project staff at state level (e.g., project coordinators, evaluators), SMT members. Key project staff at LEA level (e.g., project coordinators, evaluators), CMT members. Key project staff at state level (e.g., project coordinators, evaluators), SMT members. Key project staff at LEA level (e.g., project coordinators, evaluators), CMT members. Project Evaluator .......................................... Project Evaluator .......................................... State KIIs .............................. 14 1 1 14 District KIIs ........................... 63 1 1 63 State Collaborator Survey .... 208 1 .5 104 District Collaborator Survey .. 624 1 .33 206 7 4 1.5 42 21 4 1.5 126 State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument. District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument. Implementation Study Program and school staff working at the state & district level. Program and school staff working at the school level. KIIs ........................................ 56 1 1 56 School-Level Survey ............. *2,100 1 .45 945 Total ....................................................... ............................................... 3,093 ........................ ........................ 1,556 *10 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES respondents will participate in up to 10 schools in each of the 21 LEAs The estimate reflects the average annual number of respondents, the average annual number of responses, the time it will take for each response, and the average annual burden. The number of grantees in each year is assumed to be constant. Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by October 24, 2014 to the SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to: 202–395–7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2014–22630 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162–20–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Sep 23, 2014 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [Docket No. DHS–2014–0007] Information Collection Request; Critical Infrastructure Private Sector Clearance Program National Protection and Programs Directorate, DHS. ACTION: 60-day notice and request for comments; Revision of a currently approved collection: 1670–0013. AGENCY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP) will submit the following Information Collection Request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until November 24, 2014. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Written comments and questions about this Information Collection Request should be forwarded to DHS/NPPD/IP/Cheryl Fenoli, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop 0607, Arlington, VA 20598–0609. Emailed requests should go to Cheryl Fenoli, Cheryl.Fenoli@hq.dhs.gov. Written comments should reach the contact person listed no later than November 24, 2014. Comments must be identified by ‘‘DHS–2014–0007’’and may be submitted by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov . • Email: Include the docket number in the subject line of the message. Instructions: All submissions received must include the words ‘‘Department of Homeland Security’’ and the docket number for this action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. ADDRESSES: The Critical Infrastructure Private Sector Clearance Program (PSCP) sponsors SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM 24SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57118-57120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information 
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.

Project: Multi-Site Evaluation of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students 
(SS/HS) State Program--NEW

    The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's 
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will conduct the 
multi-site evaluation of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) 
state program. The data collected through the multi-site evaluation 
addresses three study components: (1) The planning, collaboration, and 
partnership study; (2) the implementation study; and (3) the workforce 
study.
    The SS/HS state program funded grantees in seven states beginning 
in September 2013. Data will be collected from state/tribal 
administrators, Local Education Authorities (LEAs)/Districts, local 
program staff (e.g., school resource officers, teachers and 
administrators, and psychologists) and program partners (e.g., parents, 
representatives from the juvenile justice and mental health providers).
    Data collection activities will include key informant interviews, 
and web-based surveys. The instruments to be used for data collection 
are as follows:

Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study

 State Key Informant Interview Protocol
 District Key Informant Interview Protocol
 State Collaborator Survey
 District Collaborator Survey
 State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument
 District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument

Implementation Study

 State & District Key Informant Interview Protocol
 School-Level Survey

Workforce Study

 No additional instruments will be used for this study. Data 
will be gathered from the Planning, Collaboration and Partnership Study 
and the Implementation Study.
A summary table of the number of respondents and respondent burden has 
also been included.

Data Collection Activities for MSE Grantees

    Data for all instruments will be collected annually with the 
exception of data for the state and District Collaboration Indicator 
Data Instrument which will be collected quarterly.

State Key Informant Interview (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership 
Study)

    The key informant interview protocol will collect information on 
the service model, partnerships and interagency collaboration, program 
implementation fidelity, plan deviations, and state and local policy 
development at the state level. Interviews will also include questions 
to learn about opportunities that were provided for workforce training. 
Responses will be compared over time to assess positive development of 
the program model, emerging barriers and facilitators to 
implementation, and evolving solutions. On average, 14 state 
administrators will be interviewed annually and the duration of the 
interview is estimated to be one hour.

[[Page 57119]]

District Key Informant Interview (Planning, Collaboration and 
Partnership Study)

    The purpose of these interviews is to identify, through the 
perspectives of LEA administrators and program partners their 
descriptions of SS/HS program activities. In particular, the degree to 
which critical SS/HS framework elements are operationalized, as well as 
the degree to which principles and strategies are acknowledged and 
integrated as part of the service processes. Topics include the 
provider's approach to service provision (sensitivity to health 
disparities, cultural competence), the coordination of services across 
the LEA and other local agencies, training of mental health workers, 
local policy and protocol development, and barriers/facilitators at the 
local level that influence the adoption, integration, and 
sustainability of SS/HS principles. Responses will be compared over 
time to assess positive development of the program model. It is 
anticipated that an average of 63 district administrators and program 
partners will participate in the interview each year and the interviews 
will be about one hour in duration.

State Collaborator Survey (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership 
Study)

    The state administrator's survey will seek to understand the level 
of inter-professional collaboration among entities working at the state 
level to promote expanded school mental health. The survey will also 
capture perceptions of partnership functioning in terms of partner 
goals, resources, culture and values, and roles and responsibilities, 
as well as leadership and collaboration among partners as they impact 
(1) school and community partner engagement, (2) facilitators, (3) 
barriers, (4) shared decision-making, (5) partnership structure, and 
(6) sustainability. An average of 208 state administrators and program 
partners will complete the survey annually and it is estimated that 
completion will take 30 minutes.

District Collaborator Survey (Planning, Collaboration and Partnership 
Study)

    The state administrator's survey will seek to understand the level 
of inter-professional collaboration among entities working at the 
district level to promote expanded school mental health. The survey 
will also capture perceptions of partnership functioning in terms of 
partner goals, resources, culture and values, and roles and 
responsibilities, as well as leadership and collaboration among 
partners as they impact (1) school and community partner engagement, 
(2) facilitators, (3) barriers, (4) shared decision-making, (5) 
partnership structure, and (6) sustainability. An average of 624 LEA 
district administrators and program partners will complete the survey 
annually and the time for completion is estimated to be 45 minutes.

State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument (Planning, Collaboration 
and Partnership Study)

    The State Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument will gather data 
about the program activities that occur at the state level. By tracking 
these activities, it will be possible to determine the frequency with 
which administrators engage in SS/HS program related activities such as 
holding meetings, the number of persons who attend such meetings, 
whether and the frequency with which trainings and other support 
activities occur as well as the participants in such trainings. The 
instrument will also track whether and what type of resources are 
leveraged by program partners at the state level. One instrument will 
be completed by each state and it is estimated that it will take on 
average 1.5 hours to gather the data and complete the instrument.

District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument (Planning, 
Collaboration and Partnership Study)

    The District Collaboration Indicator Data Instrument will gather 
data about the program activities that occur at the LEA/district level. 
By tracking these activities, it will be possible to determine the 
frequency with which LEA administrators and program partners at the 
district level hold meetings, the number of persons who attend such 
meetings, whether and the frequency with which trainings and other 
support activities occur, and the participants in such trainings. The 
instrument will also track whether and what type of resources are 
leveraged by program partners at the district level. One instrument 
will be completed by each of the 21 LEAs and it is estimated that it 
will take on average 1.5 hours to gather the data and complete the 
instrument.

State and District Key Informant Interview (Implementation Study)

    The State and District Key Informant Interviews will be held with 
administrators and program partners at the state and LEA districts. The 
interviews will seek to gain an understanding of respondents' 
perspectives as these relate to the degree to which critical SS/HS 
framework elements are operationalized, as well as the degree to which 
mental health principles and strategies are acknowledged and integrated 
as part of the service processes. The interviews will also seek to gain 
an understanding of the types of services and supports that have been 
implemented as a result of the SS/HS program, children's access to 
mental health services, and the facilitators and barriers to program 
implementation. Interviews will also include questions to learn about 
the role workforce development opportunities played in program 
implementation. A total of 56 persons will be interviewed: 14 at the 
state/tribal level and 42 at the district level. Interviews will take 
on average one hour to complete.
    School-Level Survey (Implementation Study): The school-level survey 
will be completed by persons who work within the schools that are 
participating in the SS/HS state program. The survey combines items 
from three surveys: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) 
assesses mental health and social service provider attitudes toward 
adopting evidence-based practices. The Mental Health Service 
Integration Survey (MHSIS) assesses professional school mental health 
roles, service integration, and barriers and facilitators of mental 
health service integration in schools. The School Mental Health Quality 
Assessment Questionnaire (SMHQAQ) is a 40 item instrument divided into 
10 domains that assess the integration of school mental health services 
delivered in schools. The 10 domains related to the 10 principles of 
expanded school mental health include: (1) Access to care; (2) Needs 
assessment; (3) Evidence-based practices; (4) Stakeholder involvement 
and feedback; (5) Quality assessment and improvement; (6) Continuum of 
care and referral processes; (7) Clinician training, support, and 
service delivery; (8) Competently addressing developmental, cultural, 
and personal differences; (9) Interdisciplinary collaboration and 
communication; and (10) Community coordination. The School Mental 
Health Capacity Instrument is a 27-item scale that assesses the 
capacity of schools to address the mental health needs of students. The 
schools can be rated along a continuum using the three individual 
subscales of intervention, early recognition & referral, or prevention 
& promotion. In addition, the total sum of all three scales provides an 
overall measure of capacity. The intervention subscale looks at 
training, protocols, and the designation of specific follow-up 
procedures for children referred for

[[Page 57120]]

mental health services. Early recognition and referral covers universal 
screenings for potential problems, and communication between staff 
members to discuss students who may be experiencing mental health 
concerns. Finally, prevention and promotion looks at the efforts 
focused on student's social-emotional development. A total of 2,100 
persons will be invited to complete the survey annually and it is 
estimated that completion of the survey will take on average 25 
minutes.
    Internet-based technology will be used for collecting data via Web-
based surveys, and for data entry and management. The average annual 
respondent burden is estimated below.

                                  Table 1--Estimates of Annualized Hour Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of     Responses per   Average hours   Total annual
      Type of respondents          Instrument       respondents     respondent    per respondent    hour burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Planning, Collaboration & Participation Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key project staff at state      State KIIs......              14               1               1              14
 level (e.g., project
 coordinators, evaluators),
 SMT members.
Key project staff at LEA level  District KIIs...              63               1               1              63
 (e.g., project coordinators,
 evaluators), CMT members.
Key project staff at state      State                        208               1              .5             104
 level (e.g., project            Collaborator
 coordinators, evaluators),      Survey.
 SMT members.
Key project staff at LEA level  District                     624               1             .33             206
 (e.g., project coordinators,    Collaborator
 evaluators), CMT members.       Survey.
Project Evaluator.............  State                          7               4             1.5              42
                                 Collaboration
                                 Indicator Data
                                 Instrument.
Project Evaluator.............  District                      21               4             1.5             126
                                 Collaboration
                                 Indicator Data
                                 Instrument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Implementation Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program and school staff        KIIs............              56               1               1              56
 working at the state &
 district level.
Program and school staff        School-Level            \*\2,100               1             .45             945
 working at the school level.    Survey.
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ................           3,093  ..............  ..............           1,556
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\10 respondents will participate in up to 10 schools in each of the 21 LEAs
The estimate reflects the average annual number of respondents, the average annual number of responses, the time
  it will take for each response, and the average annual burden. The number of grantees in each year is assumed
  to be constant.

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent by October 24, 2014 to the SAMHSA 
Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of 
comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing 
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged 
to submit their comments to OMB via email to: 
OIRASubmission@omb.eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged 
to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their 
comments to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.

Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2014-22630 Filed 9-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P