Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 56338-56339 [2014-22419]

Download as PDF 56338 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE— Continued [09/10/2014 through 09/15/2014] Date accepted for investigation Firm name Firm address Glide Bikes, Inc ......... 4510 Northchase Parkway NE., Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28405. 1220 North Dakota Street, Canton, SD 57013. Legacy Electronics, Inc. Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: September 15, 2014. Michael DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner. BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–94–2014] tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Approval of Subzone Status; LEEVAC Shipyards, LLC; Jennings, Louisiana On July 16, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal District, grantee of FTZ 87, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 87 on behalf of LEEVAC Shipyards, LLC, in Jennings, Louisiana. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 42501, 7–22–2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 87D is approved, 17:15 Sep 18, 2014 Jkt 232001 9/15/2014 The firm produces balance bikes for all ages and abilities. The firm manufactures high density memory modules, printed circuit boards, solid state drives and other computer products. subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 87’s 2,000acre activation limit. Dated: September 15, 2014. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–22422 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–928] Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 17, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units (‘‘innersprings’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013.1 The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of these comments, our final determination remains unchanged from the Preliminary Results. DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2014 AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2014–22354 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am] VerDate Sep<11>2014 9/15/2014 Product(s) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 14666 (March 17, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0116. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 17, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results in the Federal Register, and provided interested parties an opportunity to comment.2 On April 16, 2014, the Department received a case brief from Leggett and Platt, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’).3 No other interested party filed case or rebuttal briefs. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units.4 The product is currently classified under subheading 9404.29.9010 and has also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or 7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case brief by Petitioner are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated herein by reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 2 Id., 79 FR 14667. Fourth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Case Brief, dated April 16, 2014. 4 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2012– 2013 Administrative Review,’’ which is dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’) for a complete description of the Scope of the Order. 3 See E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Facts Available As stated in the Preliminary Results, Goldon Bedding Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd (‘‘Goldon’’) and Ta Cheng Coconut Knitting Company Ltd. (‘‘Ta Cheng’’) each failed to cooperate to the best of their ability in providing requested information because they withheld requested information, failed to provide the information in a timely manner and in the form requested, and significantly impeded this proceeding.5 Accordingly, pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) and section 776(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), we find it appropriate to assign to Goldon and Ta Cheng dumping margins of 234.51 percent based on total adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’). Because Goldon is located in Malaysia and Ta Cheng is located in Taiwan, we are treating them as third-country resellers. Accordingly, this rate only applies to Goldon’s and Ta Cheng’s PRC-origin merchandise.6 Final Results of Review tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The weighted-average dumping margins for the period February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013, are as follows: Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review in the Federal Register. For Goldon and Ta Cheng, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on their entries of subject merchandise at the rate of 234.51 percent. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be 234.51 percent for their entries of subject (i.e., PRC-origin PSF) merchandise; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the PRC-wide entity of 234.51 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter with the subject merchandise. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final Weighted- reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR average Exporter dumping 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate margin regarding the reimbursement of (percent) antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period Goldon Bedding Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd ............................ 234.51 of review. Failure to comply with this Ta Cheng Coconut Knitting requirement could result in the Company Ltd. .......................... 234.51 Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties Assessment occurred and the subsequent assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the of doubled antidumping duties. Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Administrative Protective Orders Department will determine, and U.S. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 5 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying a reminder to parties subject to Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–6. administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion of this issue. of their responsibility concerning the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:15 Sep 18, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56339 return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: September 12, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Issue 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2014–22419 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–475–818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 16, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of the changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta from Italy and preliminarily determined that Delverde Industrie Ailimentari S.p.A. (‘‘Delverde’’) was not the successor-in-interest to Del Verde S.p.A., a company excluded from the order.1 We received comments from interested parties. Based on our analysis, for the final results, the Department continues to find that Delverde is not the successor-in-interest to Del Verde S.p.A. AGENCY: 1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 28481 (May 16, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56338-56339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-928]


Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 17, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary results 
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered 
innerspring units (``innersprings'') from the People's Republic of 
China (``PRC'') covering the period February 1, 2012, through January 
31, 2013.\1\ The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of these 
comments, our final determination remains unchanged from the 
Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic 
of China: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 
14666 (March 17, 2014) (``Preliminary Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2014

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0116.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On March 17, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
in the Federal Register, and provided interested parties an opportunity 
to comment.\2\ On April 16, 2014, the Department received a case brief 
from Leggett and Platt, Inc. (``Petitioner'').\3\ No other interested 
party filed case or rebuttal briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id., 79 FR 14667.
    \3\ See Fourth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of 
China: Case Brief, dated April 16, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring 
units.\4\ The product is currently classified under subheading 
9404.29.9010 and has also been classified under subheadings 
9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or 7326.20.0071 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). The 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes 
only; the written product description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
entitled ``Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of 
China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 
2012-2013 Administrative Review,'' which is dated concurrently with 
and hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision 
Memorandum'') for a complete description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case brief by Petitioner are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated herein by 
reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we 
respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this 
notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public

[[Page 56339]]

document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Use of Facts Available and Adverse Facts Available

    As stated in the Preliminary Results, Goldon Bedding Manufacturing 
(M) Sdn Bhd (``Goldon'') and Ta Cheng Coconut Knitting Company Ltd. 
(``Ta Cheng'') each failed to cooperate to the best of their ability in 
providing requested information because they withheld requested 
information, failed to provide the information in a timely manner and 
in the form requested, and significantly impeded this proceeding.\5\ 
Accordingly, pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) and 
section 776(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), we 
find it appropriate to assign to Goldon and Ta Cheng dumping margins of 
234.51 percent based on total adverse facts available (``AFA''). 
Because Goldon is located in Malaysia and Ta Cheng is located in 
Taiwan, we are treating them as third-country resellers. Accordingly, 
this rate only applies to Goldon's and Ta Cheng's PRC-origin 
merchandise.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum at 5-6.
    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion of 
this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    The weighted-average dumping margins for the period February 1, 
2012, through January 31, 2013, are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporter                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goldon Bedding Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd....................      234.51
Ta Cheng Coconut Knitting Company Ltd.......................      234.51
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of the final results of review in the 
Federal Register.
    For Goldon and Ta Cheng, the Department will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on their entries of subject merchandise at the rate 
of 234.51 percent.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be 234.51 percent for their 
entries of subject (i.e., PRC-origin PSF) merchandise; (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that 
established for the PRC-wide entity of 234.51 percent; and (4) for all 
non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their 
own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter with the subject 
merchandise. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 
a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order 
(``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction 
of proprietary information disclosed under APO, which continues to 
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 12, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Issue
5. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2014-22419 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P