Fees for Submitting Corrected Electronic Title Appendices, 55694-55695 [2014-22232]
Download as PDF
55694
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the Office may rely on this process
somewhat more in this proceeding to
the extent it believes it would be useful
to provide a final opportunity for
proponents, opponents or others to
supply missing information for the
record or otherwise resolve issues that
the Office believes are material to
particular exemptions. Such requests for
responses to questions will take the
form of a letter from the Copyright
Office and will be addressed to
individual parties involved in the
proposal as to which more information
is sought. While responding to such a
request will be voluntary, any response
will be need to be supplied by a
specified deadline. After the receipt of
all responses, the Office will post the
questions and responses on the Office’s
Web site as part of the public record.
5. Recommendation and Final Rule
Finally, in accordance with the
statutory framework, the Register will
review the record, consult with the
Assistant Secretary, and prepare a
recommendation with proposed
regulations for the Librarian. See
Conference Report at 64. Thereafter, the
Librarian will make a final
determination and publish the
exemptions in the Federal Register for
later codification in title 37 of the CFR
17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1)(D).
6. Schedule of Proceedings
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
As noted above, petitions for
proposed rulemaking are due on
November 3, 2014. After the Office
publishes the notice of proposed
rulemaking, it intends to give
proponents at least 45 days to prepare
and file their evidentiary submissions.
The opponents will then have at least 45
days to respond, followed by a reply
period of at least 30 days. The Office
will provide at least 30 days’ notice
before the public hearings begin. Parties
who receive post-hearing questions will
be given at least 14 days to respond. The
precise dates for these future aspects of
the proceeding will be provided in
subsequent Federal Register notices.
Dated: September 11, 2014.
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2014–22082 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
U.S. Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2014–08]
Fees for Submitting Corrected
Electronic Title Appendices
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Copyright Office
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register a final rule amending
its regulations to allow remitters to
submit title lists in electronic format
when recording a document pertaining
to 100 or more copyrighted works. As
the rule explains, when a remitter
submits an electronic title list along
with a document for recordation, the
Office will use the information in the
electronic list to populate its online
Public Catalog. In response to comments
received during the electronic title list
rulemaking, the Office also established
a process to allow a remitter to correct
inaccuracies in the Office’s online
Public Catalog resulting from errors in
an electronic list submitted by the
remitter. In this separate notice of
proposed rulemaking, the Office seeks
to establish a new fee for this correction
service at the rate of seven dollars per
corrected title.
DATES: Written comments are due on or
before October 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: All comments shall be
submitted electronically. A comment
submission page is posted on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://
copyright.gov/rulemaking/etitle-fees/.
The Web site interface requires
commenting parties to complete a form
specifying their name and organization,
as applicable, and to upload comments
as an attachment via a browser button.
To meet accessibility standards,
commenting parties must upload
comments in a single file not to exceed
six megabytes (MB) in one of the
following formats: A Portable Document
File (PDF) format that contains
searchable, accessible text (not an
image); Microsoft Word; WordPerfect;
Rich Text Format (RTF); or ASCII text
file format (not a scanned document).
The maximum file size is 6 megabytes.
The form and face of the comments
must include both the name of the
submitter and organization. The Office
will post the comments publicly on the
Office’s Web site in the form that they
are received, along with associated
names and organizations. If electronic
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submission of comments is not feasible,
please contact the Office at 202–707–
8350 for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarang V. Damle, Special Advisor to the
General Counsel, by email at sdam@
loc.gov or by telephone at 202–707–
8350, or Abi Oyewole, AttorneyAdvisor, by email at aoye@loc.gov or by
telephone at 202–707–8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Over the past several years, the
Copyright Office has sought public
input on technological upgrades to the
recordation function. See 78 FR 17722
(Mar. 22, 2013); 79 FR 2696 (Jan. 15,
2014). In addition to seeking written
comments, the Office has held focused
discussions with copyright owners,
users of copyright records, technical
experts, public interest organizations,
lawyers, and professional and industry
associations regarding the same. See 79
FR 6636 (Feb. 4, 2014). Participants in
these processes have expressed a
number of concerns about the current
recordation system, including
frustration with the submission process,
the amount of time the Office requires
to record remitted documents, and the
searchability of the public record. These
problems are related in part to the fact
that recordation remains a paper-driven
process (in contrast to most registration
transactions, which occur
electronically).1
To date, recordation specialists have
had to review paper documents and
manually transcribe selected
information from the documents into an
electronic format in order to permit
indexing in the Office’s online Public
Catalog. Among the information that
must be transcribed are the titles of
copyrighted works associated with a
document submitted for recordation,
which are typically presented in a list
appended to the document, referred to
informally as a ‘‘title appendix.’’ A title
appendix associated with a document
can include hundreds, or even
thousands, of titles. The Office
attributes the long processing times
associated with document recordation
in considerable part to the manual entry
of these titles. In an effort to reduce
processing time for recorded document
submissions, on July 16, 2014, the
1 For further information, see the comments
obtained during the Copyright Office’s two-year
Special Projects process, particularly the Special
Project on Technical Upgrades to Registration and
Recordation Functions. Comments pertaining to the
Special Project on Technological Upgrades to
Registration and Recordation Functions are
available on the Copyright Office Web site at https://
www.copyright.gov/_upgrades/comments/.
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
55695
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Office proposed a new rule that would,
among other things, allow remitters to
submit electronic title appendices
containing 100 or more titles in
electronic format. See 79 FR 41470 (July
16, 2014).
The Recording Industry Association
of America, Inc., (‘‘RIAA’’) commented
on the proposed rule, stating, among
other things, that the Office should
‘‘provide for a mechanism or procedure
by which a remitter can easily correct
any errors to the electronic title list that
the remitter has supplied.’’ 2 The Office
agreed, and has adopted such a
procedure as part of the final electronic
title list rule, to be codified at 37 CFR
201.4(c)(4)(v). See the final rule entitled
‘‘Changes to Recordation Practices’’
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. Under the new
§ 201.4(c)(4)(v), if a remitter discovers
that an error in an electronic title list
has led to the inaccurate cataloging of a
recorded document, it may submit a
corrected title list to the Copyright
Office in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the rule.
However, to avoid delay in
implementing the electronic title list
option, the Office decided to issue that
final rule without imposition of a fee for
corrections until such time as a fee is set
in accordance with this separate notice.3
II. Discussion
Section 708(a) of title 17 authorizes
the Register to fix fees for services other
than those enumerated in paragraphs
(1)–(9) of section 708(a) based on cost
and without prior submission to
Congress.4 See 17 U.S.C. 708(a). Fees for
Office services that the Register has the
discretion to establish based on cost and
without Congressional review include
fees for copying Office records, fees for
mail and delivery services, and fees for
special handling. See 79 FR 15910,
15916–17 (Mar. 24, 2014). With the rule
proposed herein, the Office seeks to
adopt a new fee to recover costs
associated with the correction of errors
in the online Public Catalog following
recordation of a document where the
errors stem from a remitter’s inaccurate
electronic title list.
Based on a cost analysis, the Office
believes that the initial fee for this
service should be established at seven
dollars per corrected title. The Office
arrived at the seven dollar amount by
considering the various personnel and
systems costs associated with providing
the new service. To process a corrected
title list, senior recordation staff must
first review the nature and extent of
corrections, and the Office’s accounting
staff must process the payment
associated with the submission. Then,
the corrections must be individually
transcribed into the Office’s online
Public Catalog; this is a labor-intensive
process that involves searching for the
original entry by volume and document
number, finding the title or titles that
require correction, and amending and/or
adding new titles to the database. Once
entered into the online Public Catalog,
the resulting changes must be checked
to ensure the correction process was
successful.
After evaluating the anticipated
personnel and overhead expenses that
will be incurred to accomplish the
above tasks, the Office estimates the
average cost to be seven dollars per
corrected title. The Office therefore
proposes to establish the new fee at that
amount.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
amending 37 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. In § 201.3, revise paragraph (c)(16)
to read as follows:
■
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
*
*
*
*
*
Fees
($)
Registration, recordation and related services
*
*
*
*
*
*
(16) Recordation of document, including a notice of intention to enforce (single title) ..........................................................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles) ............................................................................................................................................
Correction of online Public Catalog data due to erroneous electronic title submission (per title) ..........................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 201.4, as added elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register,
effective October 17, 2014, revise the
last sentence of paragraph (c)(4)(v) to
read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 201.4 Recordation of transfers and
certain other documents.
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
*
*
2 Recording Industry Ass’n of Am., Inc.,
Comments Submitted in Response to U.S. Copyright
Office’s July 16, 2014 Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Aug. 15, 2014) (‘‘RIAA Comments’’),
available at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
105
35
7
*
(v) * * * Upon receipt of a corrected
electronic list in proper form and the
appropriate fee, the Office will proceed
to correct the data in the online Public
Catalog, and will make a note in the
record indicating that the corrections
were made and the date they were
made.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 11, 2014.
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
recordation-practices/docket2014-4/comments/
RIAA.pdf.
3 There are already fees in effect for the
recordation of the document and processing of
associated titles. See 37 CFR 201.3(c)(16).
4 Fees for core Office services such as registration
of a claim, recording a transfer of copyright
ownership or other document, issuance of a
certificate of registration, and certain other services
are to be submitted by the Register to Congress
before they take effect. See 17 U.S.C. 708(a)–(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
[FR Doc. 2014–22232 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
Agencies
- Library of Congress
- U.S. Copyright Office
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55694-55695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22232]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
U.S. Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2014-08]
Fees for Submitting Corrected Electronic Title Appendices
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register a final rule amending its regulations to allow
remitters to submit title lists in electronic format when recording a
document pertaining to 100 or more copyrighted works. As the rule
explains, when a remitter submits an electronic title list along with a
document for recordation, the Office will use the information in the
electronic list to populate its online Public Catalog. In response to
comments received during the electronic title list rulemaking, the
Office also established a process to allow a remitter to correct
inaccuracies in the Office's online Public Catalog resulting from
errors in an electronic list submitted by the remitter. In this
separate notice of proposed rulemaking, the Office seeks to establish a
new fee for this correction service at the rate of seven dollars per
corrected title.
DATES: Written comments are due on or before October 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: All comments shall be submitted electronically. A comment
submission page is posted on the Copyright Office Web site at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/etitle-fees/. The Web site interface requires
commenting parties to complete a form specifying their name and
organization, as applicable, and to upload comments as an attachment
via a browser button. To meet accessibility standards, commenting
parties must upload comments in a single file not to exceed six
megabytes (MB) in one of the following formats: A Portable Document
File (PDF) format that contains searchable, accessible text (not an
image); Microsoft Word; WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or ASCII
text file format (not a scanned document). The maximum file size is 6
megabytes. The form and face of the comments must include both the name
of the submitter and organization. The Office will post the comments
publicly on the Office's Web site in the form that they are received,
along with associated names and organizations. If electronic submission
of comments is not feasible, please contact the Office at 202-707-8350
for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarang V. Damle, Special Advisor to
the General Counsel, by email at sdam@loc.gov or by telephone at 202-
707-8350, or Abi Oyewole, Attorney-Advisor, by email at aoye@loc.gov or
by telephone at 202-707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Over the past several years, the Copyright Office has sought public
input on technological upgrades to the recordation function. See 78 FR
17722 (Mar. 22, 2013); 79 FR 2696 (Jan. 15, 2014). In addition to
seeking written comments, the Office has held focused discussions with
copyright owners, users of copyright records, technical experts, public
interest organizations, lawyers, and professional and industry
associations regarding the same. See 79 FR 6636 (Feb. 4, 2014).
Participants in these processes have expressed a number of concerns
about the current recordation system, including frustration with the
submission process, the amount of time the Office requires to record
remitted documents, and the searchability of the public record. These
problems are related in part to the fact that recordation remains a
paper-driven process (in contrast to most registration transactions,
which occur electronically).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For further information, see the comments obtained during
the Copyright Office's two-year Special Projects process,
particularly the Special Project on Technical Upgrades to
Registration and Recordation Functions. Comments pertaining to the
Special Project on Technological Upgrades to Registration and
Recordation Functions are available on the Copyright Office Web site
at https://www.copyright.gov/upgrades/comments/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, recordation specialists have had to review paper documents
and manually transcribe selected information from the documents into an
electronic format in order to permit indexing in the Office's online
Public Catalog. Among the information that must be transcribed are the
titles of copyrighted works associated with a document submitted for
recordation, which are typically presented in a list appended to the
document, referred to informally as a ``title appendix.'' A title
appendix associated with a document can include hundreds, or even
thousands, of titles. The Office attributes the long processing times
associated with document recordation in considerable part to the manual
entry of these titles. In an effort to reduce processing time for
recorded document submissions, on July 16, 2014, the
[[Page 55695]]
Office proposed a new rule that would, among other things, allow
remitters to submit electronic title appendices containing 100 or more
titles in electronic format. See 79 FR 41470 (July 16, 2014).
The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., (``RIAA'')
commented on the proposed rule, stating, among other things, that the
Office should ``provide for a mechanism or procedure by which a
remitter can easily correct any errors to the electronic title list
that the remitter has supplied.'' \2\ The Office agreed, and has
adopted such a procedure as part of the final electronic title list
rule, to be codified at 37 CFR 201.4(c)(4)(v). See the final rule
entitled ``Changes to Recordation Practices'' published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register. Under the new Sec. 201.4(c)(4)(v),
if a remitter discovers that an error in an electronic title list has
led to the inaccurate cataloging of a recorded document, it may submit
a corrected title list to the Copyright Office in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the rule. However, to avoid delay in
implementing the electronic title list option, the Office decided to
issue that final rule without imposition of a fee for corrections until
such time as a fee is set in accordance with this separate notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Recording Industry Ass'n of Am., Inc., Comments Submitted in
Response to U.S. Copyright Office's July 16, 2014 Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Aug. 15, 2014) (``RIAA Comments''), available at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/recordation-practices/docket2014-4/comments/RIAA.pdf.
\3\ There are already fees in effect for the recordation of the
document and processing of associated titles. See 37 CFR
201.3(c)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion
Section 708(a) of title 17 authorizes the Register to fix fees for
services other than those enumerated in paragraphs (1)-(9) of section
708(a) based on cost and without prior submission to Congress.\4\ See
17 U.S.C. 708(a). Fees for Office services that the Register has the
discretion to establish based on cost and without Congressional review
include fees for copying Office records, fees for mail and delivery
services, and fees for special handling. See 79 FR 15910, 15916-17
(Mar. 24, 2014). With the rule proposed herein, the Office seeks to
adopt a new fee to recover costs associated with the correction of
errors in the online Public Catalog following recordation of a document
where the errors stem from a remitter's inaccurate electronic title
list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Fees for core Office services such as registration of a
claim, recording a transfer of copyright ownership or other
document, issuance of a certificate of registration, and certain
other services are to be submitted by the Register to Congress
before they take effect. See 17 U.S.C. 708(a)-(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on a cost analysis, the Office believes that the initial fee
for this service should be established at seven dollars per corrected
title. The Office arrived at the seven dollar amount by considering the
various personnel and systems costs associated with providing the new
service. To process a corrected title list, senior recordation staff
must first review the nature and extent of corrections, and the
Office's accounting staff must process the payment associated with the
submission. Then, the corrections must be individually transcribed into
the Office's online Public Catalog; this is a labor-intensive process
that involves searching for the original entry by volume and document
number, finding the title or titles that require correction, and
amending and/or adding new titles to the database. Once entered into
the online Public Catalog, the resulting changes must be checked to
ensure the correction process was successful.
After evaluating the anticipated personnel and overhead expenses
that will be incurred to accomplish the above tasks, the Office
estimates the average cost to be seven dollars per corrected title. The
Office therefore proposes to establish the new fee at that amount.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
proposes amending 37 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2. In Sec. 201.3, revise paragraph (c)(16) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration, recordation and related services Fees ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ...........
(16) Recordation of document, including a notice of 105
intention to enforce (single title).......................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles)............ 35
Correction of online Public Catalog data due to erroneous 7
electronic title submission (per title)...................
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 201.4, as added elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, effective October 17, 2014, revise the last sentence of
paragraph (c)(4)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.4 Recordation of transfers and certain other documents.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) * * * Upon receipt of a corrected electronic list in proper
form and the appropriate fee, the Office will proceed to correct the
data in the online Public Catalog, and will make a note in the record
indicating that the corrections were made and the date they were made.
* * * * *
Dated: September 11, 2014.
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth,
General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2014-22232 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P