Investment Company Act Release No. IC-31235; 812-14242; Monroe Capital Corporation, et al., 52779-52780 [2014-21004]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 171 / Thursday, September 4, 2014 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Investment Company Act Release No.
IC–31235; 812–14242; Monroe Capital
Corporation, et al.; Notice of
Application
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. The Company, a Maryland
corporation, is an externally managed,
August 28, 2014.
non-diversified, closed-end
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
management investment company that
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
has elected to be regulated as a business
ACTION: Notice of an application for an
development company (‘‘BDC’’) under
order under section 6(c) of the
the Act.1 The Company’s investment
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
objective is to maximize the total return
‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from sections
to its stockholders in the form of current
18(a) and 61(a) of the Act.
income and capital appreciation
through investments in senior,
Applicants: Monroe Capital
unitranche and junior secured debt and,
Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), Monroe
to a lesser extent, unsecured
Capital BDC Advisors, LLC (the
subordinated debt and equity
‘‘Investment Adviser’’), MCC SBIC GP,
investments. The Investment Adviser, a
LLC (the ‘‘General Partner’’), and
Delaware limited liability company, is
Monroe Capital Corporation SBIC, LP
the investment adviser to the Company.
(‘‘Monroe SBIC’’).
The Investment Adviser is registered
Summary of the Application: The
under the Investment Advisers Act of
Company requests an order to permit it
1940.
to adhere to a modified asset coverage
2. Monroe SBIC, a Delaware limited
requirement.
partnership, is a small business
Filing Dates: The application was
investment company (‘‘SBIC’’) licensed
filed November 21, 2013, and amended
by the Small Business Administration
on May 23, 2014.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An (‘‘SBA’’) to operate under the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958
order granting the application will be
(‘‘SBIA’’). Monroe SBIC is excluded
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request from the definition of investment
company by section 3(c)(7) of the Act.
a hearing by writing to the
The Company directly owns 99% of
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Monroe SBIC in the form of a limited
applicants with a copy of the request,
partnership interest in Monroe SBIC.
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
Since Monroe SBIC’s inception, the
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on September 22, 2014 and General Partner, a Delaware limited
liability company, has been the general
should be accompanied by proof of
partner of Monroe SBIC and owns 1%
service on the Applicants, in the form
of Monroe SBIC in the form of a general
of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
partnership interest. The Company
certificate of service. Hearing requests
owns 100% of the General Partner’s
should state the nature of the writer’s
equity interests. As a result, the
interest, the reason for the request, and
Company, directly or indirectly through
the issues contested. Persons who wish
the General Partner, wholly owns
to be notified of a hearing may request
Monroe SBIC.
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
1. The Company requests an
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
exemption pursuant to section 6(c) of
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
the Act from the provisions of sections
Applicants: Theodore L. Koenig,
18(a) and 61(a) of the Act to permit it
Monroe Capital Corporation, 311 South
to adhere to a modified asset coverage
Wacker Drive, Suite 6400, Chicago,
requirement with respect to any direct
Illinois 60606.
or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the Company that is licensed by the
Stephan N. Packs, Senior Counsel, at
SBA to operate under the SBIA as a
(202) 551–6853, or James M. Curtis,
SBIC and relies on Section 3(c)(7) for an
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6825
exemption from the definition of
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
1 Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closedend investment company that operates for the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of making investments in securities
following is a summary of the
described in section 55(a)(1) through 55(a)(3) of the
application. The complete application
Act and makes available significant managerial
may be obtained via the Commission’s
assistance with respect to the issuers of such
securities.
Web site by searching for the file
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Sep 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52779
‘‘investment company’’ under the 1940
Act (each, a ‘‘SBIC Subsidiary’’).2
Applicants state that companies
operating under the SBIA, such as the
SBIC Subsidiary, will be subject to the
SBA’s substantial regulation of
permissible leverage in their capital
structure.
2. Section 18(a) of the Act prohibits a
registered closed-end investment
company from issuing any class of
senior security or selling any such
security of which it is the issuer unless
the company complies with the asset
coverage requirements set forth in that
section. Section 61(a) of the Act makes
section 18 applicable to a BDC, with
certain modifications. Section 18(k)
exempts an investment company
operating as an SBIC from the asset
coverage requirements for senior
securities representing indebtedness
that are contained in section 18(a)(1)(A)
and (B).
3. Applicants state that the Company
may be required to comply with the
asset coverage requirements of section
18(a) (as modified by section 61(a)) on
a consolidated basis because the
Company may be deemed to be an
indirect issuer of any class of senior
security issued by Monroe SBIC or
another SBIC Subsidiary. Applicants
state that applying section 18(a) (as
modified by section 61(a)) on a
consolidated basis generally would
require that the Company treat as its
own all assets and any liabilities held
directly either by itself, by Monroe
SBIC, or by another SBIC Subsidiary.
Accordingly, the Company requests an
order under section 6(c) of the Act
exempting the Company from the
provisions of section 18(a) (as modified
by section 61(a)), such that senior
securities issued by each SBIC
Subsidiary that would be excluded from
the SBIC Subsidiary’s asset coverage
ratio by section 18(k) if it were itself a
BDC would also be excluded from the
Company’s consolidated asset coverage
ratio.
4. Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes
the Commission to exempt any person,
security, or transaction or any class or
classes of persons, securities, or
transactions from any provision or
provisions of the Act or of any rule or
regulation thereunder if, and to the
extent that such exemption is necessary
or appropriate, in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
2 All existing entities that currently intend to rely
on the order are named as applicants. Any newly
formed SBIC Subsidiary that may rely on the order
in the future will comply with the terms and
condition of the order.
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
52780
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 171 / Thursday, September 4, 2014 / Notices
the Act. Applicants state that the
requested relief satisfies the section 6(c)
standard. Applicants contend that,
because the SBIC Subsidiary would be
entitled to rely on section 18(k) if it
were a BDC itself, there is no policy
reason to deny the benefit of that
exemption to the Company.
Applicants’ Condition
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following condition:
The Company shall not issue or sell
any senior security, and the Company
shall not cause or permit Monroe SBIC
or any other SBIC Subsidiary to issue or
sell any senior security of which the
Company, Monroe SBIC or any other
SBIC Subsidiary is the issuer except to
the extent permitted by section 18 (as
modified for BDCs by section 61) of the
Act; provided that, immediately after
the issuance or sale by any of the
Company, Monroe SBIC or any other
SBIC Subsidiary of any such senior
security, the Company, individually and
on a consolidated basis, shall have the
asset coverage required by section 18(a)
of the Act (as modified by section 61(a)).
In determining whether the Company
has the asset coverage on a consolidated
basis required by section 18(a) of the
Act (as modified by section 61(a)), any
senior securities representing
indebtedness of an SBIC Subsidiary if
that SBIC Subsidiary has issued
indebtedness that is held or guaranteed
by the SBA shall not be considered
senior securities and, for purposes of the
definition of ‘‘asset coverage’’ in Section
18(h), shall be treated as indebtedness
not represented by senior securities.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Release No. 34–72946; File No. SR–BYX–
2014–019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change to Rules 11.9 of
BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Sep 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rule 11.9 to add certain optional
price sliding functionality.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
[FR Doc. 2014–21004 Filed 9–3–14; 8:45 am]
August 28, 2014.
notice is hereby given that on August
26, 2014, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
The Exchange currently offers various
forms of sliding which, in all cases,
result in the re-pricing of an order to, or
ranking and/or display of an order at, a
price other than an order’s limit price in
order to comply with applicable
securities laws and/or Exchange rules.
Specifically, the Exchange currently
offers price sliding to ensure
compliance with Regulation NMS and
Regulation SHO. Price sliding currently
offered by the Exchange re-prices and
displays an order upon entry and in
certain cases again re-prices and redisplays an order at a more aggressive
price one time if and when permissible
(‘‘single display-price sliding’’), and
optionally continually re-prices an order
(‘‘multiple display-price sliding’’) based
on changes in the national best bid
(‘‘NBB’’) or national best offer (‘‘NBO’’,
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and together with the NBB, the
‘‘NBBO’’). The Exchange proposes to
add another optional process, the Price
Adjust process, as described below.
Price Adjust in all contexts for which it
is being proposed will have to be
elected by a User 3 in order to be applied
by the Exchange.
In contrast to display-price sliding,
which is based solely on Protected
Quotations 4 at equities markets other
than the Exchange, Price Adjust would
be based on Protected Quotations at
external markets and at the Exchange. If
the Exchange has a Protected Quotation
that an incoming order to the Exchange
locks or crosses then such order
executes against the resting order, or, if
the incoming order is a BATS Post Only
Order or Partial Post Only at Limit
Order, such order would be executed in
accordance with Rules 11.9(c)(6) and
(c)(7), respectively, or adjusted pursuant
to the Price Adjust process, as described
in further detail below. Because the
Exchange will route orders to external
markets with locking or crossing
quotations, the Exchange notes that the
Price Adjust process would only be
applicable to non-routable orders,
including BATS Only Orders, BATS
Post Only Orders and Partial Post Only
at Limit Orders. In turn, because BATS
Only Orders will execute against
locking or crossing interest on the
Exchange (including both Protected
Quotations as well as any non-displayed
interest), the fact that Price Adjust
would be based on Protected Quotations
at the Exchange is only relevant for
BATS Post Only Orders and Partial Post
Only at Limit Orders.
With respect to price sliding offered
to ensure compliance with Regulation
NMS (‘‘display-price sliding’’), under
the Exchange’s current rules, if, at the
time of entry, a non-routable order
would cross a Protected Quotation
displayed by another trading center the
Exchange re-prices and ranks such order
at the locking price, and displays such
order at one minimum price variation
below the NBO for bids and above the
NBB for offers. Similarly, in the event a
non-routable order that, at the time of
entry, would lock a Protected Quotation
displayed by another trading center, the
3 As defined in BYX Rule 1.5(cc), a User is ‘‘any
Member or Sponsored Participant who is
authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant
to Rule 11.3.’’
4 As defined in BYX Rule 1.5(t), a ‘‘Protected
Quotation’’ is ‘‘a quotation that is a Protected Bid
or Protected Offer.’’ In turn, the term ‘‘Protected
Bid’’ or ‘‘Protected Offer’’ means ‘‘a bid or offer in
a stock that is (i) displayed by an automated trading
center; (ii) disseminated pursuant to an effective
national market system plan; and (iii) an automated
quotation that is the best bid or best offer of a
national securities exchange or association.’’
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52779-52780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21004]
[[Page 52779]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Investment Company Act Release No. IC-31235; 812-14242; Monroe
Capital Corporation, et al.; Notice of Application
August 28, 2014.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of an application for an order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from
sections 18(a) and 61(a) of the Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Monroe Capital Corporation (the ``Company''), Monroe
Capital BDC Advisors, LLC (the ``Investment Adviser''), MCC SBIC GP,
LLC (the ``General Partner''), and Monroe Capital Corporation SBIC, LP
(``Monroe SBIC'').
Summary of the Application: The Company requests an order to permit
it to adhere to a modified asset coverage requirement.
Filing Dates: The application was filed November 21, 2013, and
amended on May 23, 2014.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on September 22, 2014 and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers,
a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of
the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: Theodore L. Koenig,
Monroe Capital Corporation, 311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6400,
Chicago, Illinois 60606.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephan N. Packs, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6853, or James M. Curtis, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6825
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. The Company, a Maryland corporation, is an externally managed,
non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has
elected to be regulated as a business development company (``BDC'')
under the Act.\1\ The Company's investment objective is to maximize the
total return to its stockholders in the form of current income and
capital appreciation through investments in senior, unitranche and
junior secured debt and, to a lesser extent, unsecured subordinated
debt and equity investments. The Investment Adviser, a Delaware limited
liability company, is the investment adviser to the Company. The
Investment Adviser is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end
investment company that operates for the purpose of making
investments in securities described in section 55(a)(1) through
55(a)(3) of the Act and makes available significant managerial
assistance with respect to the issuers of such securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Monroe SBIC, a Delaware limited partnership, is a small business
investment company (``SBIC'') licensed by the Small Business
Administration (``SBA'') to operate under the Small Business Investment
Act of 1958 (``SBIA''). Monroe SBIC is excluded from the definition of
investment company by section 3(c)(7) of the Act. The Company directly
owns 99% of Monroe SBIC in the form of a limited partnership interest
in Monroe SBIC. Since Monroe SBIC's inception, the General Partner, a
Delaware limited liability company, has been the general partner of
Monroe SBIC and owns 1% of Monroe SBIC in the form of a general
partnership interest. The Company owns 100% of the General Partner's
equity interests. As a result, the Company, directly or indirectly
through the General Partner, wholly owns Monroe SBIC.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. The Company requests an exemption pursuant to section 6(c) of
the Act from the provisions of sections 18(a) and 61(a) of the Act to
permit it to adhere to a modified asset coverage requirement with
respect to any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company that is licensed by the SBA to operate under the SBIA as a SBIC
and relies on Section 3(c)(7) for an exemption from the definition of
``investment company'' under the 1940 Act (each, a ``SBIC
Subsidiary'').\2\ Applicants state that companies operating under the
SBIA, such as the SBIC Subsidiary, will be subject to the SBA's
substantial regulation of permissible leverage in their capital
structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the
order are named as applicants. Any newly formed SBIC Subsidiary that
may rely on the order in the future will comply with the terms and
condition of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Section 18(a) of the Act prohibits a registered closed-end
investment company from issuing any class of senior security or selling
any such security of which it is the issuer unless the company complies
with the asset coverage requirements set forth in that section. Section
61(a) of the Act makes section 18 applicable to a BDC, with certain
modifications. Section 18(k) exempts an investment company operating as
an SBIC from the asset coverage requirements for senior securities
representing indebtedness that are contained in section 18(a)(1)(A) and
(B).
3. Applicants state that the Company may be required to comply with
the asset coverage requirements of section 18(a) (as modified by
section 61(a)) on a consolidated basis because the Company may be
deemed to be an indirect issuer of any class of senior security issued
by Monroe SBIC or another SBIC Subsidiary. Applicants state that
applying section 18(a) (as modified by section 61(a)) on a consolidated
basis generally would require that the Company treat as its own all
assets and any liabilities held directly either by itself, by Monroe
SBIC, or by another SBIC Subsidiary. Accordingly, the Company requests
an order under section 6(c) of the Act exempting the Company from the
provisions of section 18(a) (as modified by section 61(a)), such that
senior securities issued by each SBIC Subsidiary that would be excluded
from the SBIC Subsidiary's asset coverage ratio by section 18(k) if it
were itself a BDC would also be excluded from the Company's
consolidated asset coverage ratio.
4. Section 6(c) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt any
person, security, or transaction or any class or classes of persons,
securities, or transactions from any provision or provisions of the Act
or of any rule or regulation thereunder if, and to the extent that such
exemption is necessary or appropriate, in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
[[Page 52780]]
the Act. Applicants state that the requested relief satisfies the
section 6(c) standard. Applicants contend that, because the SBIC
Subsidiary would be entitled to rely on section 18(k) if it were a BDC
itself, there is no policy reason to deny the benefit of that exemption
to the Company.
Applicants' Condition
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following condition:
The Company shall not issue or sell any senior security, and the
Company shall not cause or permit Monroe SBIC or any other SBIC
Subsidiary to issue or sell any senior security of which the Company,
Monroe SBIC or any other SBIC Subsidiary is the issuer except to the
extent permitted by section 18 (as modified for BDCs by section 61) of
the Act; provided that, immediately after the issuance or sale by any
of the Company, Monroe SBIC or any other SBIC Subsidiary of any such
senior security, the Company, individually and on a consolidated basis,
shall have the asset coverage required by section 18(a) of the Act (as
modified by section 61(a)). In determining whether the Company has the
asset coverage on a consolidated basis required by section 18(a) of the
Act (as modified by section 61(a)), any senior securities representing
indebtedness of an SBIC Subsidiary if that SBIC Subsidiary has issued
indebtedness that is held or guaranteed by the SBA shall not be
considered senior securities and, for purposes of the definition of
``asset coverage'' in Section 18(h), shall be treated as indebtedness
not represented by senior securities.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-21004 Filed 9-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P