Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 52300-52301 [2014-20985]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
52300
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Notices
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The meeting will be held at
Mt. Hood National Forest Headquarters
Office, 16400 Champion Way, Sandy,
Oregon. Written comments may be
submitted as described under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. All
comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at the Mt.
Hood National Forest Headquarters
Office. Please call ahead for directions
and to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Connie Athman, Designated Federal
Offical, by phone at (503) 668–1672 or
via email at cathman@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is to experience
a field trip review of projects authorized
under Title II of the Act.
The agenda will include time for
people to make oral statements of three
minutes or less. Individuals wishing to
make an oral statement should request
in writing within 7 days of the meeting
to be scheduled on the agenda. Anyone
who would like to bring related matters
to the attention of the Committee may
file written statements with the
Committee staff before or after the
meeting. Written comments and time
requests for oral comments must be sent
to Connie Athman, Mt. Hood National
Forest, 16400 Champion Way, Sandy,
Oregon 97055; by email to cathman@
fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (503) 668–
1413. Summary/minutes of the meeting
will be posted on the Web site listed
above within 45 days after the meeting.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices
or other reasonable accommodation for
access to the facility or proceedings by
contacting the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
Dated: August 25, 2014.
Sharon Wallace,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014–20899 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Sep 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–60–2014]
Foreign-Trade Zone 286—Caledonia,
Essex and Orleans Counties, Vermont
Application for Reorganization
(Expansion of Service Area) Under the
Alternative Site Framework
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board
(the Board) by the Northeastern
Vermont Development Association,
grantee of FTZ 286, requesting authority
to expand its service area under the
alternative site framework (ASF)
adopted by the Board (15 CFR Sec.
400.2(c)). The ASF is an option for
grantees for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones
and can permit significantly greater
flexibility in the designation of new
‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/
users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service
area’’ in the context of the Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
a zone. The application was submitted
pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones
Act, as amended (19 U.S. C. 81a–81u),
and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR
part 400). It was formally docketed on
August 27, 2014.
FTZ 286 was approved by the Board
on March 22, 2013 (Board Order 1890,
78 FR 20295–20296, 04–04–2013). The
zone currently has a service area that
includes the Counties of Caledonia,
Essex and Orleans Counties.
The applicant is requesting authority
to expand the service area of the zone
to include Lamoille County, as
described in the application. If
approved, the grantee would be able to
serve sites throughout the expanded
service area based on companies’ needs
for FTZ designation. The application
indicates that the proposed expanded
service area is adjacent to the Derby
Line Customs and Border Protection
port of entry.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Kathleen Boyce of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate
and analyze the facts and information
presented in the application and case
record and to report findings and
recommendations to the Board. Public
comment is invited from interested
parties. Submissions shall be addressed
to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is November 3, 2014.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to November
17, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’section of the Board’s
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Kathleen Boyce at
Kathleen.Boyce@trade.gov or (202) 482–
1346.
Dated: August 28, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray.
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–20987 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–813]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms From
India: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding its
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms (mushrooms)
from India for the period February 1,
2013, through January 31, 2014 (POR).
DATES: Effective September 3, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Johnson or Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4929 or (202) 482–
1280, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 3, 2014, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms
from India for the POR.1
On February 28, 2014, in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the Department received
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 6159
(February 3, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Notices
timely requests from Monterey
Mushrooms Inc. and Sunny Dell Foods
Inc., (the petitioners), to conduct an
administrative review of the sales of
Agro Dutch Industries Limited (Agro
Dutch); Himalya International Ltd.
(Himalya); Hindustan Lever Ltd.
(formerly Ponds India, Ltd.)
(Hindustan); Transchem Ltd.
(Transchem); and Weikfield Foods Pvt.
Ltd (Weikfield).
On April 1, 2014, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on mushrooms from India with respect
to the above-named companies.2
The Department stated in its initiation
of this review that it intended to rely on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data to select respondents.3
However, our review of the CBP
database, with respect to the companies
for which reviews were requested,
showed no entries of mushrooms
originating in India, subject to
antidumping duties and countervailing
duties (AD/CVD), during the POR.4
On April 4, 2014, we sent a ‘‘No
Shipments Inquiry’’ to CBP to confirm
that there were no shipments or entries
of mushrooms from India during the
POR from the companies subject to
review. We received no information
from CBP to contradict the results of our
data query.
On April 17, 2014, we received a no
shipment claim for the POR from
Weikfield.
On May 21, 2014, Sunny Dell Food
Inc. timely withdrew its request for a
review of all five companies named
above. On June 3, 2014, Monterey
Mushrooms timely withdrew its request
for a review of Agro Dutch, Hindustan,
Transchem and Weikfield.
On June 6, 2014, Monterey
Mushrooms placed on the record
shipment manifest data that suggested
that Himalya may have exported subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. Monterey Mushrooms
requested that the Department work
with CBP to determine whether
Himalya, in fact, exported subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR and, if appropriate, to conduct
a review of Himalya’s POR shipments
On June 30, 2014, we rescinded the
review, in part, with respect to Agro
2 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 79 FR 18262 (April 1, 2014) (Initiation
Notice).
3 See Initiation Notice.
4 See April 1, 2014, Memorandum to the File
entitled ‘‘Release of Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) Data.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Sep 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dutch, Hindustan, Transchem, and
Weikfield.5
On August 12, 2014, we issued a
memorandum stating that because the
CBP data query showed there are no
suspended entries from Himalya subject
to this review upon which to assess
duties, we intend to rescind this
review.6 Also on August 12, 2014,
consistent with this memorandum, we
referred to CBP the matter raised in
Monterey Mushrooms’ June 6, 2014,
submission.7 We invited parties to
comment on our intent to rescind this
administrative review. We did not
receive comments from any interested
party.
Rescission of Review
It is the Department’s practice to
rescind an administrative review
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) when
there are no reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
which liquidation is suspended.8 At the
end of the administrative review, the
suspended entries are liquidated at the
assessment rate computed for the review
period.9 Therefore, for an administrative
review to be conducted there must be a
reviewable, suspended entry to be
liquidated at the newly calculated
assessment rate. Because the CBP data
query showed there are no suspended
entries from the company subject to this
review upon which to assess duties, we
are rescinding this review of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms
from India pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3). The Department intends
to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers for whom this review is
5 See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 79 FR 36720
(June 30, 2014).
6 See August 12, 2014, Memorandum to James
Maeder, Director, Office II, AD/CVD Operations,
entitled ‘‘Intent to Rescind Administrative Review.’’
7 See August 12, 2014, Letter from James Maeder,
Director, Office II, Antidumping/Countervailing
Duty Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, to
Cynthia Whittenburg, Executive Director, Office of
International Trade, CBP.
8 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Brazil: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 32498 (June 1,
2012); and Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars
From Turkey; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 67 FR 21634 (May 1,
2002), unchanged in Certain Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 67 FR 66110 (October 30,
2002).
9 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). See also section
751(a)(2)(A) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52301
being rescinded of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751 of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 27, 2014.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–20985 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–944]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has conducted an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain oil
country tubular goods (OCTG) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC). On
February 25, 2014, the Department
published the Preliminary Results for
this administrative review.1 The period
of review (POR) is January 1, 2012,
AGENCY:
1 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
the People’s Republic of China: Partial Rescission
and Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 10475 (Feb. 25,
2014).
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52300-52301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-813]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding its
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms (mushrooms) from India for the period February 1,
2013, through January 31, 2014 (POR).
DATES: Effective September 3, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Johnson or Terre Keaton
Stefanova, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-4929 or (202) 482-1280, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 3, 2014, the Department published in the Federal
Register a notice of ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review''
of the antidumping duty order on mushrooms from India for the POR.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 79 FR 6159 (February 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 28, 2014, in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), the
Department received
[[Page 52301]]
timely requests from Monterey Mushrooms Inc. and Sunny Dell Foods Inc.,
(the petitioners), to conduct an administrative review of the sales of
Agro Dutch Industries Limited (Agro Dutch); Himalya International Ltd.
(Himalya); Hindustan Lever Ltd. (formerly Ponds India, Ltd.)
(Hindustan); Transchem Ltd. (Transchem); and Weikfield Foods Pvt. Ltd
(Weikfield).
On April 1, 2014, the Department published in the Federal Register
a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on mushrooms from India with respect to the above-named
companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews
and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262 (April 1, 2014)
(Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department stated in its initiation of this review that it
intended to rely on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data to
select respondents.\3\ However, our review of the CBP database, with
respect to the companies for which reviews were requested, showed no
entries of mushrooms originating in India, subject to antidumping
duties and countervailing duties (AD/CVD), during the POR.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Initiation Notice.
\4\ See April 1, 2014, Memorandum to the File entitled ``Release
of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 4, 2014, we sent a ``No Shipments Inquiry'' to CBP to
confirm that there were no shipments or entries of mushrooms from India
during the POR from the companies subject to review. We received no
information from CBP to contradict the results of our data query.
On April 17, 2014, we received a no shipment claim for the POR from
Weikfield.
On May 21, 2014, Sunny Dell Food Inc. timely withdrew its request
for a review of all five companies named above. On June 3, 2014,
Monterey Mushrooms timely withdrew its request for a review of Agro
Dutch, Hindustan, Transchem and Weikfield.
On June 6, 2014, Monterey Mushrooms placed on the record shipment
manifest data that suggested that Himalya may have exported subject
merchandise to the United States during the POR. Monterey Mushrooms
requested that the Department work with CBP to determine whether
Himalya, in fact, exported subject merchandise to the United States
during the POR and, if appropriate, to conduct a review of Himalya's
POR shipments
On June 30, 2014, we rescinded the review, in part, with respect to
Agro Dutch, Hindustan, Transchem, and Weikfield.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 79
FR 36720 (June 30, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 12, 2014, we issued a memorandum stating that because the
CBP data query showed there are no suspended entries from Himalya
subject to this review upon which to assess duties, we intend to
rescind this review.\6\ Also on August 12, 2014, consistent with this
memorandum, we referred to CBP the matter raised in Monterey Mushrooms'
June 6, 2014, submission.\7\ We invited parties to comment on our
intent to rescind this administrative review. We did not receive
comments from any interested party.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See August 12, 2014, Memorandum to James Maeder, Director,
Office II, AD/CVD Operations, entitled ``Intent to Rescind
Administrative Review.''
\7\ See August 12, 2014, Letter from James Maeder, Director,
Office II, Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement
and Compliance, to Cynthia Whittenburg, Executive Director, Office
of International Trade, CBP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review
It is the Department's practice to rescind an administrative review
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) when there are no reviewable entries
of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is
suspended.\8\ At the end of the administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the assessment rate computed for the review
period.\9\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted
there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the
newly calculated assessment rate. Because the CBP data query showed
there are no suspended entries from the company subject to this review
upon which to assess duties, we are rescinding this review of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms from India pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77
FR 32498 (June 1, 2012); and Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars
From Turkey; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 67 FR 21634 (May 1, 2002), unchanged in Certain Steel
Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 67 FR 66110
(October 30, 2002).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). See also section 751(a)(2)(A) of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers for whom this
review is being rescinded of their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during
this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 27, 2014.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-20985 Filed 9-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
