Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Market Maker Quoting Obligations and the Introduction of a Lead Market Maker, 50971-50975 [2014-20209]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
offsetting positions) to cover its
obligations under derivative
instruments. These procedures have
been adopted consistent with Section 18
of the 1940 Act and related Commission
guidance. In addition, each Fund will
include appropriate risk disclosure in
its offering documents, including
leveraging risk. Leveraging risk is the
risk that certain transactions of a Fund,
including a Fund’s use of derivatives,
may give rise to leverage, causing a
Fund to be more volatile than if it had
not been leveraged. To mitigate
leveraging risk, the Adviser will
segregate or ‘‘earmark’’ liquid assets or
otherwise cover the transactions that
may give rise to such risk.
(11) The Funds will seek, where
possible, to use counterparties whose
financial status is such that the risk of
default is reduced.
(12) A minimum of 100,000 Shares for
each Fund will be outstanding at the
commencement of trading on the
Exchange.
(13) Each Fund’s investments,
including derivatives, will be consistent
with each Fund’s respective investment
objective, and each Fund’s use of
derivatives may be used to enhance
leverage. However, each Fund’s
investments will not be used to seek
performance that is the multiple or
inverse multiple (i.e., 2Xs and 3Xs) of
such Fund’s broad-based securities
market index (as defined in Form N–
1A).
This approval order is based on all of
the Exchange’s representations and
description of the Funds, including
those set forth above and in the Notice.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1 thereto, is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act 46 and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.
IV. Conclusion
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,47 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–
2014–58), as modified by Amendment
No. 1 thereto, be, and it hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.48
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–20208 Filed 8–25–14; 8:45 am]
On June 19, 2014, NASDAQ OMX BX,
Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule
change relating to market maker quoting
obligations and the introduction of a
lead market maker. The proposed rule
change was published for public
comment in the Federal Register on July
8, 2014.3 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule
change. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
of the total number of minutes in such
trading day).
BX proposes to reduce the quoting
requirement for BX Options Market
Makers so a Market Maker must quote
the options in which it is registered
60% of the trading day (as a percentage
of the total number of minutes in such
trading day) or such higher percentage
as BX may announce in advance. In
addition, this quoting obligation would
apply to all of a Market Maker’s
registered options collectively on a daily
basis. This quoting obligation would be
reviewed on a monthly basis, and would
allow the Exchange to review the
Market Maker’s daily compliance in the
aggregate and determine the appropriate
disciplinary action for single or multiple
failures to comply with the continuous
quoting requirement during the month
period. However, determining
compliance with the continuous quoting
requirement on a monthly basis would
not relieve a Market Maker of the
obligation to provide continuous twosided quotes on a daily basis, nor would
it prohibit the Exchange from taking
disciplinary action against a Market
Maker for failing to meet the continuous
quoting obligation each trading day.
II. Description of the Proposal
B. Lead Market Maker Allocation
The Exchange proposes to amend the
current BX Market Maker quoting
obligations and adopt rules to permit BX
Market Makers to act as Lead Market
Makers (‘‘LMMs’’), provided the LMM
meets certain obligations and quoting
requirements. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to provide assigned LMMs
with certain participation entitlements.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
provide Public Customers with priority
when the Price/Time execution
algorithm is in effect.
Currently, there are two types of
Options Participants on BX: Options
Order Entry Firms and Options Market
Makers. The Exchange proposes to add
a third type of Options Participant: an
LMM. An approved BX Options Market
Maker 4 may become an LMM in one or
more listed options. Under the proposal,
initial application(s) to become an LMM
would be in a form and/or format
prescribed by the Exchange and would
include: (1) Background information on
the LMM, including experience in
trading options; (2) the LMM’s clearing
arrangements; (3) adequacy of capital;
and (4) adherence to Exchange rules and
ability to meet the obligations of an
LMM.5 Subsequent applications would
be in a form and/or format prescribed by
the Exchange and would include the
information requested therein,
including, but not limited to, an account
of the abilities and background of the
applicant as well as any other special
requirements that the Exchange may
require.6 Once an applicant is approved
by the Exchange as an LMM, any
material change in capital would be
reported in writing to the Exchange
within two business days after the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72883; File No. SR–BX–
2014–035]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Market Maker Quoting
Obligations and the Introduction of a
Lead Market Maker
August 20, 2014.
I. Introduction
A. BX Market Maker Quoting
Obligations
Currently, Chapter VII, Section 6(d)(i)
of the BX Options Rules provides that
on a daily basis, a Market Maker must
during regular market hours make
markets consistent with the applicable
quoting requirements specified in the
BX Options Rules, on a continuous basis
in at least sixty percent (60%) of the
series in options in which the Market
Maker is registered. Chapter VII, Section
6(d)(i)(1) of the BX Options Rules
provides that, to satisfy this requirement
with respect to quoting a series, a
Market Maker must quote such series
90% of the trading day (as a percentage
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
4 See
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72502 (Jul.
1, 2014), 79 FR 38620 (‘‘Notice’’).
46 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
48 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
47 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
50971
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Chapter VII, Section 2.
proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(A)(b).
6 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(A)(c).
5 See
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50972
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
change.7 BX would not place any limit
on the number of entities that may
become LMMs, but there would only be
one LMM per class.
When an options class is to be
allocated or reallocated by the
Exchange, the Exchange would solicit
applications from all eligible LMMs. If
the Exchange determines that special
qualifications should be sought in the
successful applicant, it would indicate
such desired qualifications in the
notice.8
Under the proposal, allocation
applications would be submitted in
writing to the Exchange’s designated
staff and would include, at a minimum,
the name and background of the LMM,
the LMM’s experience and
capitalization demonstrating an ability
to trade the particular options class
sought, and any other reasons why the
LMM believes it should be assigned or
allocated the security. In addition, the
Exchange may also require that
applications include other information
such as system acceptance/execution
levels and guarantees. The Exchange
would be permitted to re-solicit
applications for any reason, including if
it determines that its initial solicitation
resulted in an insufficient number of
applicants.9
Allocation decisions and automatic
allocations would be communicated in
writing to Exchange members. Once the
LMM is allocated an issue, such LMM
would immediately notify the Exchange
in writing of any change to the
respective system acceptance/execution
levels or any other material change in
the application for any assigned issue. If
an LMM seeks to withdraw from
allocation in a security, it would be
required to notify the Exchange at least
one business day prior to the desired
effective date of such withdrawal.10
Options on Related Securities would be
automatically allocated to the LMM that
is already the LMM in Currently
Allocated Options (as defined
hereafter).11 Only one LMM would be
permitted to be allocated to an options
class.12
7 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(A)(d).
8 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(B)(a).
9 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(B)(b).
10 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(B)(c)(d) and (e).
11 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(B)(g).
12 The Exchange is defining the term ‘‘Related
Securities’’ for purpose of Chapter VII, Section 13
as follows: ‘‘Related Securities means, but is not
limited to: securities of a partially or wholly owned
subsidiary; securities that are convertible into the
securities of the issuer; warrants on securities of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Exchange would allocate new
options classes, or reallocate existing
options classes to applicants based on
the results of such factors as the
Exchange deems appropriate. Among
the factors that the Exchange may
consider in making such decisions are:
The number and type of securities in
which applicants are currently
registered; the capital and other
resources of the applicant; recent
allocation decisions within the past
eighteen months; the desirability of
encouraging the entry of new LMMs
into the Exchange’s market; order flow
commitments; any prior transfers of
LMM privileges by the applicant and
the reasons therefor and such policies as
the Board instructs the Exchange to
follow in allocating or reallocating
securities. The Exchange would also be
permitted to consider: Quality of
markets data; observance of ethical
standards and administrative
responsibilities. Solely with respect to
options class allocations or
reallocations, past or contemplated
voluntary delisting of options by LMMs,
done in the best interest of the
Exchange, would not be viewed
negatively by the Exchange in making
allocation and reallocation decisions.
The Exchange would be permitted to
allocate option classes for a limited
period of time or subject to such other
terms and conditions as it deems
appropriate.13
Requests to allocate or transfer
allocation, or transfer of an options class
request would be made in writing to the
Exchange and such transfer may only be
made to an approved LMM. The LMM
would be assigned to an options class
for a period defined by the Exchange.
The Exchange would communicate such
period in solicitation applications. The
Exchange may re-allocate an options
class after the defined period has
expired.14
issuer; securities issued in connection with a name
change; securities issued in a reverse stock split;
contingent value rights; ‘‘tracking’’ securities
designed to track the performance of the underlying
security or corporate affiliate thereof; securities
created in connection with the merger or
acquisition of one or more companies; securities
created in connection with a ‘‘spin-off’’ transaction;
convertible on non-convertible senior securities;
and securities into which a listed security is
convertible, where such Related Securities emanate
from or are related to securities underlying options
that are currently allocated to an LMM on the
Exchange (‘‘Currently Allocated Options’’). The
term Related Securities would not include
Exchange Traded Funds. See proposed BX Options
Rules at Chapter VII, Section 13(B)(f).
13 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(C).
14 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 13(D).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. LMM Obligations and Quotations
Under the Proposal, the Exchange
would require that LMM transactions
constitute a course of dealings
reasonably calculated to contribute to
the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market, and no LMM should enter into
transactions or make bids or offers that
are inconsistent with such a course of
dealings.15 Further, with respect to each
class of options in his or her
appointment, an LMM would be
expected to engage, to a reasonable
degree under the existing
circumstances, in dealings for his own
account when there exists, or it is
reasonably anticipated that there will
exist, a lack of price continuity, a
temporary disparity between the supply
of and demand for a particular option
contract, or a temporary distortion of the
price relationships between option
contracts of the same class. Without
limiting the foregoing, an LMM would
be expected to perform certain
additional activities in the course of
maintaining a fair and orderly market
pursuant to proposed Chapter VII,
Section 14(b).16
With respect to unusual conditions, if
the interest of maintaining a fair and
orderly market so requires, BX
Regulation may declare that unusual
market conditions exist in a particular
issue and allow LMMs in that issue to
make auction bids and offers with
spread differentials of up to two times,
or in exceptional circumstances,
typically up to three times, the legal
limits permitted under BX Options
Rules. In making such determinations to
allow wider markets, BX Regulation
would consider certain enumerated
factors.17 In the event that BX
Regulation determines that unusual
market conditions exist in any option, it
would be the responsibility of BX
Regulation to file a report with BX
operations setting forth the relief
granted for the unusual market
conditions, the time and duration of
such relief and the reasons therefor.18
In classes of options other than those
to which the LMM is appointed, LMMs
would not be permitted to engage in
transactions for an account in which
they have an interest that are
disproportionate in relation to, or in
derogation of, the performance of their
obligations as specified in BX Options
15 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(a).
16 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(b).
17 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(c).
18 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(c)(i).
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
Rules with respect to the classes in their
appointment. Furthermore, LMMs
would not be permitted to: (1)
Individually or as a group, intentionally
or unintentionally, dominate the market
in option contracts of a particular class;
and (2) effect purchases or sales on the
Exchange except in a reasonable and
orderly manner.19
LMMs would be prohibited from (1)
any practice or procedure whereby
LMMs trading any particular option
issue determine by agreement the
spreads or option prices at which they
will trade that issue; and (2) any
practice or procedure whereby LMMs
trading any particular option issue
determine by agreement the allocation
of orders that may be executed in that
issue.20
An LMM would be permitted to enter
quotations only in the issues included
in its appointment. An LMM would be
required to provide continuous twosided quotations throughout the trading
day in its appointed issues for 90% of
the time the Exchange is open for
trading in each issue. Such quotations
would be required to meet the legal
quote width requirements of the BX
Options Rules. These obligations would
apply to all of the LMM’s appointed
issues collectively, rather than on an
option-by-option basis. Compliance
with this obligation would be
determined on a monthly basis. BX
Regulation may consider exceptions to
the requirement to quote 90% (or
higher) of the trading day based on
demonstrated legal or regulatory
requirements or other mitigating
circumstances. However, determining
compliance with the continuous quoting
requirement on a monthly basis would
not relieve an LMM of the obligation to
provide continuous two-sided quotes on
a daily basis, nor would it prohibit the
Exchange from taking disciplinary
action against an LMM for failing to
meet the continuous quoting obligation
each trading day.21
If a technical failure or limitation of
a system of the Exchange prevents an
LMM from maintaining, or prevents an
LMM from communicating to the
Exchange, timely and accurate
electronic quotes in an issue, the
duration of such failure would not be
considered in determining whether the
LMM has satisfied the 90% quoting
standard with respect to that option
issue. The Exchange would be permitted
to consider other exceptions to this
19 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(d).
20 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(e).
21 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(f)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
continuous electronic quote obligation
based on demonstrated legal or
regulatory requirements or other
mitigating circumstances.22 An LMM
may be called upon by BX Regulation to
submit a single quote or maintain
continuous quotes in one or more series
of an option issue within its
appointment whenever, in the judgment
of BX Regulation, it is necessary to do
so in the interest of maintaining fair and
orderly markets.23
An LMM would be compelled to buy/
sell a specified quantity of option
contracts at the disseminated bid/offer
pursuant to his obligations with respect
to firm quotes. All quotes and orders
entered into the System by Options
Participants are firm under BX Options
Rules Chapter VII, Section 14(f) and
Rule 602 of Regulation NMS under the
Exchange Act (‘‘SEC Rule 602’’) for the
number of contracts specified and
according to the size requirements set
forth under BX Options Rules. Market
Maker bids and offers are not firm under
BX Options Rules Chapter VII, Section
14(f) and SEC Rule 602: (1) For the
period prior to the Opening Cross; or (2)
if any of the circumstances provided in
paragraphs (b)(3) or (c)(4) of SEC Rule
602 exist.24 The obligations of BX
Options Rules Chapter VII, Section 14(f)
would not apply to LMMs with respect
to adjusted option series, quarterly
options series, or any series with a time
to expiration of nine months or greater.
For purposes of BX Options Rules
Chapter VII, Section 14(f), an adjusted
option series would be an option series
wherein, as a result of a corporate action
by the issuer of the underlying security,
one option contract in the series
represents the delivery of other than 100
shares of underlying security.25
D. Lead Market Maker Priority
The Exchange proposes to provide
LMM participation entitlements in
Chapter VI (Trading Systems) at Section
10. Specifically, with respect to Size
Pro-Rata executions, the Exchange
would afford an LMM a participation
entitlement if the LMM’s bid/offer is at
the Exchange’s disseminated price and
all Public Customer 26 orders have been
fully executed.27 The LMM would not
22 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(f)(1)(i).
23 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(f)(2).
24 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(f)(3).
25 See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII,
Section 14(f)(4).
26 See Chapter I, Section 1(50). The term ‘‘Public
Customer’’ means a person that is not a broker or
dealer in securities.
27 Price Improving Orders will retain price
priority before an LMM participation entitlement is
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50973
be entitled to receive a number of
contracts that is greater than the
displayed size associated with such
LMM. LMM participation entitlements
would be considered after the opening
process. A BX Options LMM would
receive the greater of: The LMM’s Size
Pro-Rata share; 50% of remaining
interest if there is one or no other
Market Maker at that price; 40% of
remaining interest if there are two other
Market Makers at that price; or 30% of
remaining interest if there are more than
two other Market Makers at that price;
or if rounding would result in an
allocation of less than one contract, a
BX Options LMM would receive one
contract. Rounding would be up or
down to the nearest integer.
Orders for 5 contracts or fewer would
be allocated to the LMM. The Exchange
would review this provision quarterly
and would maintain the small order size
at a level that would not allow orders of
5 contracts or fewer executed by the
LMM to account for more than 40% of
the volume executed on the Exchange.
After all Public Customer orders have
been fully executed and LMM
participation entitlements applied, if
applicable, BX Options Market Makers
would have priority over all other
Participant orders at the same price.28
With respect to Price/Time
executions, the Exchange proposes to
provide that the highest bid and lowest
offer would have priority except that
Public Customer orders would have
priority over non-Public Customer
orders at the same price. Currently,
Public Customer orders do not have
priority over non-Public Customer
orders at the same price. If there are two
or more Public Customer orders for the
same options series at the same price,
priority would be afforded to such
Public Customer orders in the sequence
in which they are received by the
System. For purposes of BX Options
Rules Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(C)(1)(a),
a Public Customer order would not
include a Professional Order. Public
Customer Priority would always be in
effect when the Price/Time execution
algorithm is in effect.29 This would be
a substantive change which would
provide Public Customer orders with
priority over non-Public Customer
orders at the same price for executions
under the Price/Time execution
algorithm. Similar language would also
provided at the Exchange’s disseminated price. See
Chapter VI, Sections 1(a)(6) and 7(b)(3)(B).
28 See Notice, supra note 3 for examples
illustrating the manner in which an LMM would be
allocated contracts pursuant to the Size Pro-Rata
model under the proposed rule change.
29 See proposed Chapter VI, Section
10(1)(C)(1)(a).
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50974
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
be added to BX Options Rules Chapter
VI, Section 10(1)(C)(2)(i) to conform the
Size Pro-Rata language for clarity.
Public Customer priority has been in
effect when the Size Pro-Rata execution
algorithm has been in effect. This
amendment to the Size Pro-Rata
language would seek to clarify Public
Customer priority with respect to that
algorithm. The Public Customer priority
overlay recognizes the unique status of
customers in the marketplace and the
role their orders play in price
competition and adding depth to the
marketplace.
The Exchange proposes that LMM
participant entitlements may be in effect
when the Public Customer Priority
Overlay is also in effect. After all Public
Customer orders have been fully
executed, upon receipt of an order,
provided the LMM’s bid/offer is at the
Exchange’s disseminated price, the
LMM would be afforded a participation
entitlement.30 The LMM would not be
entitled to receive a number of contracts
that is greater than the displayed size
associated with such LMM. A BX
Options LMM would receive the greater
of: (a) Contracts the LMM would receive
if the allocation was based on time
priority with Public Customer priority;
(b) 50% of remaining interest if there is
one or no other Market Maker at that
price; (c) 40% of remaining interest if
there are two other Market Makers at
that price; or (d) 30% of remaining
interest if there are more than two other
Market Makers at that price or if
rounding would result in an allocation
of less than one contract, a BX Options
LMM would receive one contract.
Rounding would be up or down to the
nearest integer.
Orders for 5 contracts or fewer would
be allocated to the LMM. The Exchange
would review this provision quarterly
and would maintain the small order size
at a level that would not allow orders of
5 contracts or fewer executed by the
LMM to account for more than 40% of
the volume executed on the Exchange.31
The Exchange proposes to implement
this proposed rule change by rolling out
the rule amendments on an option-byoption basis over a period of time. The
Exchange would issue Options Trader
Alerts in advance to inform market
participants of the timing of
implementation of this proposed rule
change for various symbols.
30 Price Improving Orders will retain price
priority before an LMM participation entitlement is
provided at the Exchange’s disseminated price. See
Chapter VI, Sections 1(a)(6) and 7(b)(3)(B).
31 See Notice, supra note 3 for examples
illustrating the manner in which an LMM would be
allocated contracts pursuant to the Price/Time
model under the proposed rule change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
III. Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.32 The
Commission believes that the proposal
is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) 33 in
particular in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
A. BX Market Maker Quoting
Obligations
BX proposes to reduce the quoting
requirement for BX Options Market
Makers so a Market Maker must quote
the options in which it is registered
60% of the trading day (as a percentage
of the total number of minutes in such
trading day) or such higher percentage
as BX may announce in advance. In
addition, this quoting obligation would
apply to all of a Market Maker’s
registered options collectively on a daily
basis. This quoting obligation would be
reviewed on a monthly basis, and would
allow the Exchange to review the
Market Maker’s daily compliance in the
aggregate and determine the appropriate
disciplinary action for single or multiple
failures to comply with the continuous
quoting requirement during the month
period. The Commission notes that
determining compliance with the
continuous quoting requirement on a
monthly basis would not relieve a
Market Maker of the obligation to
provide continuous two-sided quotes on
a daily basis, nor would it prohibit the
Exchange from taking disciplinary
action against a Market Maker for failing
to meet the continuous quoting
obligation each trading day. The
Commission believes that the proposed
changes to the quoting obligations of
Market Makers are consistent with the
Act. The Commission notes that the
proposed changes to the quoting
obligations of Market Makers are
32 In approving this rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
33 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consistent with market maker
obligations in place on other markets.34
B. Lead Market Makers
The Exchange proposes to add a third
type of Options Participant: An LMM.
Each market maker who desires to be an
LMM would be required to submit an
application to the Exchange. In
allocating an option series, the
Exchange would consider a number of
factors including but not limited to, the
number and type of securities in which
applicants are currently registered; the
capital and other resources of the
applicant; recent allocation decisions
within the past eighteen months; the
desirability of encouraging the entry of
new LMMs into the Exchange’s market;
order flow commitments; any prior
transfers of LMM privileges by the
applicant and the reasons therefore;
quality of markets data; and observance
of ethical standards and administrative
responsibilities and such policies as the
Board instructs the Exchange to follow
in allocating or reallocating securities.
With respect to an LMM’s obligations,
the Exchange would require LMMs to be
subject to heightened standards as
compared to other market makers. An
LMM would be required to provide
continuous two-sided quotations
throughout the trading day in its
appointed issues for 90% of the time the
Exchange is open for trading in each
issue. Such quotations would be
required to meet legal quote width
requirements. These obligations would
apply to all of the LMM’s appointed
issues collectively, rather than on an
option-by-option basis. Compliance
with this obligation would be
determined on a monthly basis.35
In addition, an LMM’s transactions
would be required to constitute a course
of dealings reasonably calculated to
contribute to the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market. An LMM would be
required to engage in dealings for his
own account when there exists, or it is
reasonably anticipated that there will
exist, a lack of price continuity, a
temporary disparity between the supply
of and demand for a particular option
contract, or a temporary distortion of the
price relationships between option
contracts of the same class. An LMM
would be required to: (1) To compete
34 See NYSE Arca Rule 6.37B(c) and NYSE MKT
Rule 925.1NY(c).
35 The Commission notes that, as is the case with
market makers, determining compliance with the
continuous quoting requirement on a monthly basis
would not relieve an LMM of the obligation to
provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily
basis, nor would it prohibit the Exchange from
taking disciplinary action against an LMM for
failing to meet the continuous quoting obligation
each trading day.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
with other LMMs to improve the market
in all series of options classes to which
the LMM is appointed; (2) to make
markets that will be honored for the
number of contracts entered into the
Trading System in all series of options
classes within the LMM’s appointment;
(3) to update market quotations in
response to changed market conditions
in all series of options classes within the
LMM’s appointment; and (4) to quote
with a difference not to exceed $5 (or
such other quote width difference
established by BX Regulation) between
the bid and offer regardless of the price
of the bid.
Under the proposal, an LMM would
be entitled to a participation guarantee,
as described more fully in Section II.D
above, if the LMM’s bid/offer is at the
Exchange’s disseminated price and all
Public Customer orders have been fully
executed.
The Commission believes that the
proposed rules regarding LMMs are
consistent with the Act and raise no
novel issues. The Commission notes
that the proposed rules regarding LMMs
are substantially similar to the rules of
other exchanges.36 The Commission
also believes that the Exchange’s
proposed priority and allocation rules
are consistent with the Act. The
Commission has previously approved
participation guarantees for LMMs,
provided such LMM meets specified,
higher quoting obligations.37 The
Commission believes that these
guarantees strike a reasonable balance
between rewarding certain participants
for making markets and providing other
market participants an incentive to
quote aggressively.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–BX–2014–
035), is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.38
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–20209 Filed 8–25–14; 8:45 am]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
36 See e.g., NASDAQ OMX PHLX Rules 501, 505,
506 and 511 and NYSE Arca Rules 6.37A and
6.37B.
37 See e.g., Rule 8.87 of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated.
38 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72881; File No. SR–BYX–
2014–016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change to Rule 11.9(f) of BATS YExchange, Inc.
August 20, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
11, 2014, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rule 11.9(f) to adopt a new
Match Trade Prevention Modifier
(‘‘MTP’’) called Cancel Smallest. The
Exchange has designated this proposal
as non-controversial and provided the
Commission with the notice required by
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.3 The
Exchange requests that the Commission
waive the 30-day pre-operative waiting
period contained in Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
under the Act.4 If such waiver is granted
by the Commission, the Exchange shall
implement this rule proposal on or
about August 22, 2014.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
4 Id.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50975
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Earlier this year, the Exchange and its
affiliate BATS Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’)
received approval to affect a merger (the
‘‘Merger’’) of the Exchange’s parent
company, BATS Global Markets, Inc.,
with Direct Edge Holdings LLC, the
indirect parent of EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘EDGX’’) and EDGA Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘EDGA’’, and together with BZX, BYX
and EDGX, the ‘‘BGM Affiliated
Exchanges’’).5 In the context of the
Merger, the BGM Affiliated Exchanges
are working to align certain system
functionality, retaining only intended
differences between the BGM Affiliated
Exchanges. Thus, the proposal set forth
below is intended to add certain system
functionality currently offered by EDGA
and EDGX in order to provide a
consistent technology offering for users
of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges.
Like EDGA and EDGX,6 the Exchange
currently offers various MTP modifiers
under BYX Rule 11.9(f) which are
designed to prevent two orders with the
same Unique Identifier (as defined
below) from executing against each
other. The MTP modifiers can be set at
the market participant identifier
(‘‘MPID’’), the Exchange Member
identifier or the Exchange Sponsored
Participant identifier level (any such
identifier, a ‘‘Unique Identifier’’).7 To
align its MTP functionality with EDGA
and EDGX, the Exchange now proposes
add a new MTP modifier called Cancel
Smallest (‘‘MCS’’) under BYX Rule
11.9(f). An incoming order marked with
the proposed MCS modifier will not
execute against opposite side resting
interest marked with any MTP modifier
originating from the same Unique
Identifier. If both orders are equivalent
in size, both orders will be cancelled
back to the originating User.8 If the
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71375
(January 23, 2014), 79 FR 4771 (January 29, 2014)
(SR–BATS–2013–059; SR–BYX–2013–039).
6 See EDGA Rule 11.9(f); EDGX Rule 11.9(f).
7 Any Exchange Member that has an MPID issued
by FINRA is identified in the Exchange’s internal
systems by that MPID. Each Exchange Member that
does not already have an MPID and each Sponsored
Participant is issued an identifier that is specific to
the Exchange and allows the Exchange to determine
the User for each order and trade.
8 The term ‘‘User’’ is defined under Exchange
Rule 11.5(cc) as ‘‘any Member or Sponsored
Continued
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50971-50975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20209]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72883; File No. SR-BX-2014-035]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Market Maker Quoting
Obligations and the Introduction of a Lead Market Maker
August 20, 2014.
I. Introduction
On June 19, 2014, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or the ``Exchange''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') a proposed rule change
relating to market maker quoting obligations and the introduction of a
lead market maker. The proposed rule change was published for public
comment in the Federal Register on July 8, 2014.\3\ The Commission
received no comment letters on the proposed rule change. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72502 (Jul. 1, 2014), 79
FR 38620 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend the current BX Market Maker quoting
obligations and adopt rules to permit BX Market Makers to act as Lead
Market Makers (``LMMs''), provided the LMM meets certain obligations
and quoting requirements. In addition, the Exchange proposes to provide
assigned LMMs with certain participation entitlements. Finally, the
Exchange proposes to provide Public Customers with priority when the
Price/Time execution algorithm is in effect.
A. BX Market Maker Quoting Obligations
Currently, Chapter VII, Section 6(d)(i) of the BX Options Rules
provides that on a daily basis, a Market Maker must during regular
market hours make markets consistent with the applicable quoting
requirements specified in the BX Options Rules, on a continuous basis
in at least sixty percent (60%) of the series in options in which the
Market Maker is registered. Chapter VII, Section 6(d)(i)(1) of the BX
Options Rules provides that, to satisfy this requirement with respect
to quoting a series, a Market Maker must quote such series 90% of the
trading day (as a percentage of the total number of minutes in such
trading day).
BX proposes to reduce the quoting requirement for BX Options Market
Makers so a Market Maker must quote the options in which it is
registered 60% of the trading day (as a percentage of the total number
of minutes in such trading day) or such higher percentage as BX may
announce in advance. In addition, this quoting obligation would apply
to all of a Market Maker's registered options collectively on a daily
basis. This quoting obligation would be reviewed on a monthly basis,
and would allow the Exchange to review the Market Maker's daily
compliance in the aggregate and determine the appropriate disciplinary
action for single or multiple failures to comply with the continuous
quoting requirement during the month period. However, determining
compliance with the continuous quoting requirement on a monthly basis
would not relieve a Market Maker of the obligation to provide
continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis, nor would it prohibit the
Exchange from taking disciplinary action against a Market Maker for
failing to meet the continuous quoting obligation each trading day.
B. Lead Market Maker Allocation
Currently, there are two types of Options Participants on BX:
Options Order Entry Firms and Options Market Makers. The Exchange
proposes to add a third type of Options Participant: an LMM. An
approved BX Options Market Maker \4\ may become an LMM in one or more
listed options. Under the proposal, initial application(s) to become an
LMM would be in a form and/or format prescribed by the Exchange and
would include: (1) Background information on the LMM, including
experience in trading options; (2) the LMM's clearing arrangements; (3)
adequacy of capital; and (4) adherence to Exchange rules and ability to
meet the obligations of an LMM.\5\ Subsequent applications would be in
a form and/or format prescribed by the Exchange and would include the
information requested therein, including, but not limited to, an
account of the abilities and background of the applicant as well as any
other special requirements that the Exchange may require.\6\ Once an
applicant is approved by the Exchange as an LMM, any material change in
capital would be reported in writing to the Exchange within two
business days after the
[[Page 50972]]
change.\7\ BX would not place any limit on the number of entities that
may become LMMs, but there would only be one LMM per class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Chapter VII, Section 2.
\5\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(A)(b).
\6\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(A)(c).
\7\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(A)(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When an options class is to be allocated or reallocated by the
Exchange, the Exchange would solicit applications from all eligible
LMMs. If the Exchange determines that special qualifications should be
sought in the successful applicant, it would indicate such desired
qualifications in the notice.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(B)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, allocation applications would be submitted in
writing to the Exchange's designated staff and would include, at a
minimum, the name and background of the LMM, the LMM's experience and
capitalization demonstrating an ability to trade the particular options
class sought, and any other reasons why the LMM believes it should be
assigned or allocated the security. In addition, the Exchange may also
require that applications include other information such as system
acceptance/execution levels and guarantees. The Exchange would be
permitted to re-solicit applications for any reason, including if it
determines that its initial solicitation resulted in an insufficient
number of applicants.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(B)(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocation decisions and automatic allocations would be
communicated in writing to Exchange members. Once the LMM is allocated
an issue, such LMM would immediately notify the Exchange in writing of
any change to the respective system acceptance/execution levels or any
other material change in the application for any assigned issue. If an
LMM seeks to withdraw from allocation in a security, it would be
required to notify the Exchange at least one business day prior to the
desired effective date of such withdrawal.\10\ Options on Related
Securities would be automatically allocated to the LMM that is already
the LMM in Currently Allocated Options (as defined hereafter).\11\ Only
one LMM would be permitted to be allocated to an options class.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(B)(c)(d) and (e).
\11\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(B)(g).
\12\ The Exchange is defining the term ``Related Securities''
for purpose of Chapter VII, Section 13 as follows: ``Related
Securities means, but is not limited to: securities of a partially
or wholly owned subsidiary; securities that are convertible into the
securities of the issuer; warrants on securities of the issuer;
securities issued in connection with a name change; securities
issued in a reverse stock split; contingent value rights;
``tracking'' securities designed to track the performance of the
underlying security or corporate affiliate thereof; securities
created in connection with the merger or acquisition of one or more
companies; securities created in connection with a ``spin-off''
transaction; convertible on non-convertible senior securities; and
securities into which a listed security is convertible, where such
Related Securities emanate from or are related to securities
underlying options that are currently allocated to an LMM on the
Exchange (``Currently Allocated Options''). The term Related
Securities would not include Exchange Traded Funds. See proposed BX
Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section 13(B)(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange would allocate new options classes, or reallocate
existing options classes to applicants based on the results of such
factors as the Exchange deems appropriate. Among the factors that the
Exchange may consider in making such decisions are: The number and type
of securities in which applicants are currently registered; the capital
and other resources of the applicant; recent allocation decisions
within the past eighteen months; the desirability of encouraging the
entry of new LMMs into the Exchange's market; order flow commitments;
any prior transfers of LMM privileges by the applicant and the reasons
therefor and such policies as the Board instructs the Exchange to
follow in allocating or reallocating securities. The Exchange would
also be permitted to consider: Quality of markets data; observance of
ethical standards and administrative responsibilities. Solely with
respect to options class allocations or reallocations, past or
contemplated voluntary delisting of options by LMMs, done in the best
interest of the Exchange, would not be viewed negatively by the
Exchange in making allocation and reallocation decisions. The Exchange
would be permitted to allocate option classes for a limited period of
time or subject to such other terms and conditions as it deems
appropriate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests to allocate or transfer allocation, or transfer of an
options class request would be made in writing to the Exchange and such
transfer may only be made to an approved LMM. The LMM would be assigned
to an options class for a period defined by the Exchange. The Exchange
would communicate such period in solicitation applications. The
Exchange may re-allocate an options class after the defined period has
expired.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
13(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. LMM Obligations and Quotations
Under the Proposal, the Exchange would require that LMM
transactions constitute a course of dealings reasonably calculated to
contribute to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market, and no LMM
should enter into transactions or make bids or offers that are
inconsistent with such a course of dealings.\15\ Further, with respect
to each class of options in his or her appointment, an LMM would be
expected to engage, to a reasonable degree under the existing
circumstances, in dealings for his own account when there exists, or it
is reasonably anticipated that there will exist, a lack of price
continuity, a temporary disparity between the supply of and demand for
a particular option contract, or a temporary distortion of the price
relationships between option contracts of the same class. Without
limiting the foregoing, an LMM would be expected to perform certain
additional activities in the course of maintaining a fair and orderly
market pursuant to proposed Chapter VII, Section 14(b).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(a).
\16\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to unusual conditions, if the interest of maintaining
a fair and orderly market so requires, BX Regulation may declare that
unusual market conditions exist in a particular issue and allow LMMs in
that issue to make auction bids and offers with spread differentials of
up to two times, or in exceptional circumstances, typically up to three
times, the legal limits permitted under BX Options Rules. In making
such determinations to allow wider markets, BX Regulation would
consider certain enumerated factors.\17\ In the event that BX
Regulation determines that unusual market conditions exist in any
option, it would be the responsibility of BX Regulation to file a
report with BX operations setting forth the relief granted for the
unusual market conditions, the time and duration of such relief and the
reasons therefor.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(c).
\18\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(c)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In classes of options other than those to which the LMM is
appointed, LMMs would not be permitted to engage in transactions for an
account in which they have an interest that are disproportionate in
relation to, or in derogation of, the performance of their obligations
as specified in BX Options
[[Page 50973]]
Rules with respect to the classes in their appointment. Furthermore,
LMMs would not be permitted to: (1) Individually or as a group,
intentionally or unintentionally, dominate the market in option
contracts of a particular class; and (2) effect purchases or sales on
the Exchange except in a reasonable and orderly manner.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LMMs would be prohibited from (1) any practice or procedure whereby
LMMs trading any particular option issue determine by agreement the
spreads or option prices at which they will trade that issue; and (2)
any practice or procedure whereby LMMs trading any particular option
issue determine by agreement the allocation of orders that may be
executed in that issue.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An LMM would be permitted to enter quotations only in the issues
included in its appointment. An LMM would be required to provide
continuous two-sided quotations throughout the trading day in its
appointed issues for 90% of the time the Exchange is open for trading
in each issue. Such quotations would be required to meet the legal
quote width requirements of the BX Options Rules. These obligations
would apply to all of the LMM's appointed issues collectively, rather
than on an option-by-option basis. Compliance with this obligation
would be determined on a monthly basis. BX Regulation may consider
exceptions to the requirement to quote 90% (or higher) of the trading
day based on demonstrated legal or regulatory requirements or other
mitigating circumstances. However, determining compliance with the
continuous quoting requirement on a monthly basis would not relieve an
LMM of the obligation to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily
basis, nor would it prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary
action against an LMM for failing to meet the continuous quoting
obligation each trading day.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a technical failure or limitation of a system of the Exchange
prevents an LMM from maintaining, or prevents an LMM from communicating
to the Exchange, timely and accurate electronic quotes in an issue, the
duration of such failure would not be considered in determining whether
the LMM has satisfied the 90% quoting standard with respect to that
option issue. The Exchange would be permitted to consider other
exceptions to this continuous electronic quote obligation based on
demonstrated legal or regulatory requirements or other mitigating
circumstances.\22\ An LMM may be called upon by BX Regulation to submit
a single quote or maintain continuous quotes in one or more series of
an option issue within its appointment whenever, in the judgment of BX
Regulation, it is necessary to do so in the interest of maintaining
fair and orderly markets.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(f)(1)(i).
\23\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An LMM would be compelled to buy/sell a specified quantity of
option contracts at the disseminated bid/offer pursuant to his
obligations with respect to firm quotes. All quotes and orders entered
into the System by Options Participants are firm under BX Options Rules
Chapter VII, Section 14(f) and Rule 602 of Regulation NMS under the
Exchange Act (``SEC Rule 602'') for the number of contracts specified
and according to the size requirements set forth under BX Options
Rules. Market Maker bids and offers are not firm under BX Options Rules
Chapter VII, Section 14(f) and SEC Rule 602: (1) For the period prior
to the Opening Cross; or (2) if any of the circumstances provided in
paragraphs (b)(3) or (c)(4) of SEC Rule 602 exist.\24\ The obligations
of BX Options Rules Chapter VII, Section 14(f) would not apply to LMMs
with respect to adjusted option series, quarterly options series, or
any series with a time to expiration of nine months or greater. For
purposes of BX Options Rules Chapter VII, Section 14(f), an adjusted
option series would be an option series wherein, as a result of a
corporate action by the issuer of the underlying security, one option
contract in the series represents the delivery of other than 100 shares
of underlying security.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(f)(3).
\25\ See proposed BX Options Rules at Chapter VII, Section
14(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Lead Market Maker Priority
The Exchange proposes to provide LMM participation entitlements in
Chapter VI (Trading Systems) at Section 10. Specifically, with respect
to Size Pro-Rata executions, the Exchange would afford an LMM a
participation entitlement if the LMM's bid/offer is at the Exchange's
disseminated price and all Public Customer \26\ orders have been fully
executed.\27\ The LMM would not be entitled to receive a number of
contracts that is greater than the displayed size associated with such
LMM. LMM participation entitlements would be considered after the
opening process. A BX Options LMM would receive the greater of: The
LMM's Size Pro-Rata share; 50% of remaining interest if there is one or
no other Market Maker at that price; 40% of remaining interest if there
are two other Market Makers at that price; or 30% of remaining interest
if there are more than two other Market Makers at that price; or if
rounding would result in an allocation of less than one contract, a BX
Options LMM would receive one contract. Rounding would be up or down to
the nearest integer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Chapter I, Section 1(50). The term ``Public Customer''
means a person that is not a broker or dealer in securities.
\27\ Price Improving Orders will retain price priority before an
LMM participation entitlement is provided at the Exchange's
disseminated price. See Chapter VI, Sections 1(a)(6) and 7(b)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orders for 5 contracts or fewer would be allocated to the LMM. The
Exchange would review this provision quarterly and would maintain the
small order size at a level that would not allow orders of 5 contracts
or fewer executed by the LMM to account for more than 40% of the volume
executed on the Exchange. After all Public Customer orders have been
fully executed and LMM participation entitlements applied, if
applicable, BX Options Market Makers would have priority over all other
Participant orders at the same price.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Notice, supra note 3 for examples illustrating the
manner in which an LMM would be allocated contracts pursuant to the
Size Pro-Rata model under the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Price/Time executions, the Exchange proposes to
provide that the highest bid and lowest offer would have priority
except that Public Customer orders would have priority over non-Public
Customer orders at the same price. Currently, Public Customer orders do
not have priority over non-Public Customer orders at the same price. If
there are two or more Public Customer orders for the same options
series at the same price, priority would be afforded to such Public
Customer orders in the sequence in which they are received by the
System. For purposes of BX Options Rules Chapter VI, Section
10(1)(C)(1)(a), a Public Customer order would not include a
Professional Order. Public Customer Priority would always be in effect
when the Price/Time execution algorithm is in effect.\29\ This would be
a substantive change which would provide Public Customer orders with
priority over non-Public Customer orders at the same price for
executions under the Price/Time execution algorithm. Similar language
would also
[[Page 50974]]
be added to BX Options Rules Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(C)(2)(i) to
conform the Size Pro-Rata language for clarity. Public Customer
priority has been in effect when the Size Pro-Rata execution algorithm
has been in effect. This amendment to the Size Pro-Rata language would
seek to clarify Public Customer priority with respect to that
algorithm. The Public Customer priority overlay recognizes the unique
status of customers in the marketplace and the role their orders play
in price competition and adding depth to the marketplace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See proposed Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(C)(1)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes that LMM participant entitlements may be in
effect when the Public Customer Priority Overlay is also in effect.
After all Public Customer orders have been fully executed, upon receipt
of an order, provided the LMM's bid/offer is at the Exchange's
disseminated price, the LMM would be afforded a participation
entitlement.\30\ The LMM would not be entitled to receive a number of
contracts that is greater than the displayed size associated with such
LMM. A BX Options LMM would receive the greater of: (a) Contracts the
LMM would receive if the allocation was based on time priority with
Public Customer priority; (b) 50% of remaining interest if there is one
or no other Market Maker at that price; (c) 40% of remaining interest
if there are two other Market Makers at that price; or (d) 30% of
remaining interest if there are more than two other Market Makers at
that price or if rounding would result in an allocation of less than
one contract, a BX Options LMM would receive one contract. Rounding
would be up or down to the nearest integer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Price Improving Orders will retain price priority before an
LMM participation entitlement is provided at the Exchange's
disseminated price. See Chapter VI, Sections 1(a)(6) and 7(b)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orders for 5 contracts or fewer would be allocated to the LMM. The
Exchange would review this provision quarterly and would maintain the
small order size at a level that would not allow orders of 5 contracts
or fewer executed by the LMM to account for more than 40% of the volume
executed on the Exchange.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Notice, supra note 3 for examples illustrating the
manner in which an LMM would be allocated contracts pursuant to the
Price/Time model under the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to implement this proposed rule change by
rolling out the rule amendments on an option-by-option basis over a
period of time. The Exchange would issue Options Trader Alerts in
advance to inform market participants of the timing of implementation
of this proposed rule change for various symbols.
III. Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\32\ The Commission believes that the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) \33\ in particular in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. BX Market Maker Quoting Obligations
BX proposes to reduce the quoting requirement for BX Options Market
Makers so a Market Maker must quote the options in which it is
registered 60% of the trading day (as a percentage of the total number
of minutes in such trading day) or such higher percentage as BX may
announce in advance. In addition, this quoting obligation would apply
to all of a Market Maker's registered options collectively on a daily
basis. This quoting obligation would be reviewed on a monthly basis,
and would allow the Exchange to review the Market Maker's daily
compliance in the aggregate and determine the appropriate disciplinary
action for single or multiple failures to comply with the continuous
quoting requirement during the month period. The Commission notes that
determining compliance with the continuous quoting requirement on a
monthly basis would not relieve a Market Maker of the obligation to
provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis, nor would it
prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary action against a Market
Maker for failing to meet the continuous quoting obligation each
trading day. The Commission believes that the proposed changes to the
quoting obligations of Market Makers are consistent with the Act. The
Commission notes that the proposed changes to the quoting obligations
of Market Makers are consistent with market maker obligations in place
on other markets.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See NYSE Arca Rule 6.37B(c) and NYSE MKT Rule 925.1NY(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Lead Market Makers
The Exchange proposes to add a third type of Options Participant:
An LMM. Each market maker who desires to be an LMM would be required to
submit an application to the Exchange. In allocating an option series,
the Exchange would consider a number of factors including but not
limited to, the number and type of securities in which applicants are
currently registered; the capital and other resources of the applicant;
recent allocation decisions within the past eighteen months; the
desirability of encouraging the entry of new LMMs into the Exchange's
market; order flow commitments; any prior transfers of LMM privileges
by the applicant and the reasons therefore; quality of markets data;
and observance of ethical standards and administrative responsibilities
and such policies as the Board instructs the Exchange to follow in
allocating or reallocating securities.
With respect to an LMM's obligations, the Exchange would require
LMMs to be subject to heightened standards as compared to other market
makers. An LMM would be required to provide continuous two-sided
quotations throughout the trading day in its appointed issues for 90%
of the time the Exchange is open for trading in each issue. Such
quotations would be required to meet legal quote width requirements.
These obligations would apply to all of the LMM's appointed issues
collectively, rather than on an option-by-option basis. Compliance with
this obligation would be determined on a monthly basis.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ The Commission notes that, as is the case with market
makers, determining compliance with the continuous quoting
requirement on a monthly basis would not relieve an LMM of the
obligation to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis,
nor would it prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary action
against an LMM for failing to meet the continuous quoting obligation
each trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, an LMM's transactions would be required to constitute
a course of dealings reasonably calculated to contribute to the
maintenance of a fair and orderly market. An LMM would be required to
engage in dealings for his own account when there exists, or it is
reasonably anticipated that there will exist, a lack of price
continuity, a temporary disparity between the supply of and demand for
a particular option contract, or a temporary distortion of the price
relationships between option contracts of the same class. An LMM would
be required to: (1) To compete
[[Page 50975]]
with other LMMs to improve the market in all series of options classes
to which the LMM is appointed; (2) to make markets that will be honored
for the number of contracts entered into the Trading System in all
series of options classes within the LMM's appointment; (3) to update
market quotations in response to changed market conditions in all
series of options classes within the LMM's appointment; and (4) to
quote with a difference not to exceed $5 (or such other quote width
difference established by BX Regulation) between the bid and offer
regardless of the price of the bid.
Under the proposal, an LMM would be entitled to a participation
guarantee, as described more fully in Section II.D above, if the LMM's
bid/offer is at the Exchange's disseminated price and all Public
Customer orders have been fully executed.
The Commission believes that the proposed rules regarding LMMs are
consistent with the Act and raise no novel issues. The Commission notes
that the proposed rules regarding LMMs are substantially similar to the
rules of other exchanges.\36\ The Commission also believes that the
Exchange's proposed priority and allocation rules are consistent with
the Act. The Commission has previously approved participation
guarantees for LMMs, provided such LMM meets specified, higher quoting
obligations.\37\ The Commission believes that these guarantees strike a
reasonable balance between rewarding certain participants for making
markets and providing other market participants an incentive to quote
aggressively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See e.g., NASDAQ OMX PHLX Rules 501, 505, 506 and 511 and
NYSE Arca Rules 6.37A and 6.37B.
\37\ See e.g., Rule 8.87 of the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-BX-2014-035), is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20209 Filed 8-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
