Chrysler Group, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 50735-50736 [2014-20037]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices
MBUSA. (the data provided by MBUSA
is included in Docket NHTSA–2012–
0166) In reviewing the information, the
data shows that the noncompliant
parking lamp exceeded the maximum
photometric requirements at 12 of 18
test points. The overages ranged from
16% to 504% with the majority (7 out
of 12) of failures being over 200%. As
such, the actual performance of the
noncompliant parking lamps is far
beyond what the agency would consider
to be within the range of the just
noticeable differences research and we
believe that it will be noticeably brighter
than a compliant lamp and potentially
glaring to oncoming drivers.
Further, MBUSA did not provide any
information regarding the proximity of
the noncompliant parking lamp to the
front turn signal lamp. FMVSS No. 108
requires that any front turn signal lamp
that is within a certain distance of any
lamp (such as an auxiliary lower beam
or fog lamp used to supplement the
lower beam headlamp), to meet higher
intensities in order to comply with the
standard. For instance, if the front turn
signal lamp is within 60mm of the
lighted edge of the auxiliary lamp, then
the turn signal must be 2.5 times
brighter than the ‘‘base’’ turn signal
lamp photometric requirements. Other
requirements exist as well depending on
the proximity of the turn signal lamp to
the lighted edge of the auxiliary lamp,
however no information was provided
by the petitioner on the noncompliant
lamp’s key relationship to other lamps
for the agency to evaluate. Because the
performance of these noncompliant
parking lamps approaches the
performance of a fog lamp and the close
proximity of these lamps to the front
turn signal lamps, the agency is
concerned that the noncompliant
parking lamp may mask the output of a
‘‘base’’ front turn signal lamp. To
address our concerns, the agency
requested information regarding the
certification of the front turn signal
lamps. MBUSA responded that the front
turn signal lamps were indeed certified
to the base photometric requirements.
VII. NHTSA Decision: In
consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA
has decided that MBUSA has not met its
burden of persuasion and that the
noncompliance described is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, MBUSA’s petition is
hereby denied, and MBUSA must notify
owners, purchasers and dealers
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
provide a remedy in accordance with 49
U.S.C. 30120.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Nancy Lummen Lewis,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014–20140 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0076; Notice 1]
Chrysler Group, LLC, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of Petition.
AGENCY:
Chrysler Group, LLC
(Chrysler), a wholly owned subsidiary
of Fiat S.p.A., has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2014 RAM
2500 trucks do not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3 of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire
Selection and Rims and Motor Home/
Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less, and
certain MY 2014 RAM 3500 trucks do
not fully comply with paragraph S5.3 of
FMVSS No. 120, Tire Selection and
Rims and Motor Home/Recreation
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity
Information for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds). Chrysler filed an
appropriate report dated May 6, 2014,
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports and amended that report on
June 10, 2014.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is September 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and must be submitted by
any of the following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50735
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Chrysler’s Petition: Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
Chrysler submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Chrysler’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: The affected
vehicles include approximately 198 MY
2014 RAM 2500 trucks and 87 MY 2014
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
50736
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices
RAM 3500 trucks that were produced
from March 4, 2014 through March 6,
2014.
III. Noncompliance: Chrysler explains
that due to the absence of the designated
rim size and type on the 49 CFR part
567 certification labels, the subject
vehicles do not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 (RAM
2500 trucks) and paragraph S5.3 of
FMVSS No. 120 (RAM 3500 trucks).
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3 of
FMVSS No. 110 requires in pertinent
part:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
* * * S4.3.3 Additional labeling information
for vehicles other than passenger cars. Each
vehicle shall show the size designation and,
if applicable, the type designation of rims
(not necessarily those on the vehicle)
appropriate for the tire appropriate for use on
that vehicle, including the tire installed as
original equipment on the vehicle by the
vehicle manufacturer, after each GAWR
listed on the certification label required by
§ 567.4 or § 567.5 of this chapter. This
information shall be in the English language,
lettered in block capitals and numerals not
less than 2.4 millimeters high and in the
following format: * * *
Paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120 requires
in pertinent part:
* * * S5.3.1 Tires. The size designation (not
necessarily for the tires on the vehicle) and
the recommended cold inflation pressure for
those tires such that the sum of the load
ratings of the tires on each axle (when the
tires’ load carrying capacity at the specified
pressure is reduced by diving by 1.10, in the
case of a tire subject to FMVSS No. 109) is
appropriate for the GAWR as calculated in
accordance with S5.1.2.
S5.3.2 Rim. The size designation and, if
applicable, the type designation of Rims (not
necessarily those on the vehicle) appropriate
for those tires. * * *
V. Summary of Chrysler’s Analyses:
Chrysler stated its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
1. Tire size and pressure information
is located on the Tire Inflation Pressure
label which is located in the same door
opening as the certification label.
a. Certification label is located on the
driver door.
b. Tire placard is located on the
forward edge of the driver’s B-pillar.
2. Tire size and inflation pressure can
be found on each tire.
3. Tire and rim information can be
found in the vehicle owner’s manual.
4. Rim/wheel size can be derived
using the tire information printed on the
Tire Inflation Pressure label or the tire
sidewall information.
5. Chrysler is not aware of any
warranty claims, field reports, customer
complaints, legal claims or any
incidents or injuries related to the
subject condition.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
6. Chrysler also stated its belief that
NHTSA has previously granted petition
similar in nature.
Chrysler has additionally informed
NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future
production of these vehicles will fully
comply with FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120.
In summation, Chrysler believes that
the described noncompliance of the
subject vehicles is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt from providing
recall notification of noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be
granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject noncompliant vehicles that
Chrysler no longer controlled at the time
it determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after Chrysler notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–20037 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am]
exemption as it pertains to the trackage
rights described in Docket No. FD
35831 1 to permit the trackage rights to
expire on February 1, 2023, in
accordance with the agreements of the
parties, subject to the employee
protective conditions set forth in Oregon
Short Line Railroad—Abandonment
Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth &
Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville
Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
This decision is effective on
September 24, 2014. Petitions to stay
must be filed by September 4, 2014.
Petitions for reconsideration must be
filed by September 15, 2014.
DATES:
Send an original and 10
copies of all pleadings, referring to
Docket No. FD 35831 (Sub-No. 1) to:
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Eric M.
Hocky, Clark Hill, PLC, One Commerce
Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000,
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Valerie Quinn, (202) 245–0382.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional information is contained in
the Board’s decision. Board decisions
and notices are available on our Web
site at ‘‘WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.’’
Decided: August 20, 2014.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Miller, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2014–20141 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35831 (Sub–No. 1)]
Grainbelt Corporation—Trackage
Rights Exemption—BNSF Railway
Company and Stillwater Central
Railroad, LLC
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Partial revocation of exemption.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the
Board partially revokes the class
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
1 In that docket, on May 27, 2014, Grainbelt
Corporation (GNBC) filed a verified notice of
exemption under the Board’s class exemption
procedures at 49 C.F.R. 1180.2(d)(7). The notice
addressed agreements in which BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) and Stillwater Central Railroad,
LLC, f/k/a Stillwater Central Railroad, Inc. (SLWC)
each agreed to grant amended trackage rights to
GNBC, which together will allow GNBC to provide
local service to a grain shuttle facility in Eldorado,
Okla. (between Altus and Quanah). Specifically,
BNSF has amended its trackage rights with GNBC
to permit local service over the connecting line
between the connection with SLWC east of Long
(milepost 668.73) and Quanah (milepost 723.30).
SLWC has amended its trackage rights with GNBC
to permit local service between Snyder Yard
(milepost 664.00) and its connection with BNSF
east of Long (milepost 668.73). Grainbelt Corp.—
Trackage Rights Exemption—BNSF Ry. & Stillwater
Cent. R.R., FD 35831 (STB served June 12, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50735-50736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20037]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0076; Notice 1]
Chrysler Group, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of Petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Chrysler Group, LLC (Chrysler), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Fiat S.p.A., has determined that certain model year (MY) 2014 RAM 2500
trucks do not fully comply with paragraph S4.3 of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor
Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less,
and certain MY 2014 RAM 3500 trucks do not fully comply with paragraph
S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/
Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds).
Chrysler filed an appropriate report dated May 6, 2014, pursuant to 49
CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports and
amended that report on June 10, 2014.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is September 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and must
be submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Chrysler's Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)
(see implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), Chrysler submitted a
petition for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements
of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Chrysler's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: The affected vehicles include approximately
198 MY 2014 RAM 2500 trucks and 87 MY 2014
[[Page 50736]]
RAM 3500 trucks that were produced from March 4, 2014 through March 6,
2014.
III. Noncompliance: Chrysler explains that due to the absence of
the designated rim size and type on the 49 CFR part 567 certification
labels, the subject vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph S4.3 of
FMVSS No. 110 (RAM 2500 trucks) and paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120
(RAM 3500 trucks).
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 requires in
pertinent part:
* * * S4.3.3 Additional labeling information for vehicles other than
passenger cars. Each vehicle shall show the size designation and, if
applicable, the type designation of rims (not necessarily those on
the vehicle) appropriate for the tire appropriate for use on that
vehicle, including the tire installed as original equipment on the
vehicle by the vehicle manufacturer, after each GAWR listed on the
certification label required by Sec. 567.4 or Sec. 567.5 of this
chapter. This information shall be in the English language, lettered
in block capitals and numerals not less than 2.4 millimeters high
and in the following format: * * *
Paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120 requires in pertinent part:
* * * S5.3.1 Tires. The size designation (not necessarily for the
tires on the vehicle) and the recommended cold inflation pressure
for those tires such that the sum of the load ratings of the tires
on each axle (when the tires' load carrying capacity at the
specified pressure is reduced by diving by 1.10, in the case of a
tire subject to FMVSS No. 109) is appropriate for the GAWR as
calculated in accordance with S5.1.2.
S5.3.2 Rim. The size designation and, if applicable, the type
designation of Rims (not necessarily those on the vehicle)
appropriate for those tires. * * *
V. Summary of Chrysler's Analyses: Chrysler stated its belief that
the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety
for the following reasons:
1. Tire size and pressure information is located on the Tire
Inflation Pressure label which is located in the same door opening as
the certification label.
a. Certification label is located on the driver door.
b. Tire placard is located on the forward edge of the driver's B-
pillar.
2. Tire size and inflation pressure can be found on each tire.
3. Tire and rim information can be found in the vehicle owner's
manual.
4. Rim/wheel size can be derived using the tire information printed
on the Tire Inflation Pressure label or the tire sidewall information.
5. Chrysler is not aware of any warranty claims, field reports,
customer complaints, legal claims or any incidents or injuries related
to the subject condition.
6. Chrysler also stated its belief that NHTSA has previously
granted petition similar in nature.
Chrysler has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future production of these vehicles will
fully comply with FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120.
In summation, Chrysler believes that the described noncompliance of
the subject vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and
that its petition, to exempt from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject noncompliant vehicles that
Chrysler no longer controlled at the time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not
relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the
sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control
after Chrysler notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-20037 Filed 8-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P