Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 49496-49497 [2014-19872]
Download as PDF
49496
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 162 / Thursday, August 21, 2014 / Notices
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: August 14, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Scope of the Order
2. Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
3. Product Comparisons
4. Date of Sale
5. Constructed Export Price
6. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability
B. Level of Trade
C. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
D. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
7. Currency Conversion
8. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–19871 Filed 8–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–837]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Aug 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan. The
period of review (POR) is July 1, 2012,
through June 30, 2013. On January 8,
2014, the Department published a notice
rescinding the review with respect to
Shinkong Materials Technology
Corporation.1 This review covers the
remaining respondent Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation (Nan Ya), a producer and
exporter of PET Film from Taiwan. The
Department preliminarily determines
that sales of subject merchandise have
been made below normal value (NV) by
Nan Ya. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page at (202) 482–1398; AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is PET Film. The PET Film subject to
the order is currently classifiable under
subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from Taiwan; 2012–2013 Administrative
Review’’ (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), which is hereby
adopted by this notice.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
1 See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From
Taiwan: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 1362
(January 8, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export price is
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin for
the period July 1, 2012, through June 30,
2013.
Manufacturer/exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation ....
1.56
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days of
the date of publication of this notice.2
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
no later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.3 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
five days after the date for filing case
briefs.4 Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.5 Case and
rebuttal briefs should be filed using IA
ACCESS.6 In order to be properly filed,
IA ACCESS must successfully receive
an electronically-filed document in its
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
2 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
6 See 19 CFR 351.303.
3 See
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 162 / Thursday, August 21, 2014 / Notices
notice.7 Requests should contain: (1) the
party’s name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to those raised in the respective
case briefs.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review.
If Nan Ya’s weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in
the final results of this review, we will
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of the sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate calculated in
the final results of this review is above
de minimis. Where the respondent’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall be
the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by each
respondent for which they did not know
that their merchandise it sold to a
reseller was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate of 2.40
7 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Aug 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
percent 8 if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.9
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective for all shipments of
PET Film from Taiwan entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for the company under
review will be the rate established in the
final results of this review (except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, no cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters is 2.40 percent.10 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
8 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film)
from Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as
corrected in 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002) (PET Film
from Taiwan Amended Final Determination).
9 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
10 See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final
Determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49497
Dated: August 14, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Comparisons to Normal Value
5. Product Comparisons
6. Date of Sale
7. Export Price
8. Normal Value
9. Currency Conversion
10. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–19872 Filed 8–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–845]
Sugar From Mexico: Postponement of
Preliminary Determination of
Antidumping Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; Sugar From Mexico:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: August 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2014, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated
the antidumping duty (AD)
investigation of sugar from Mexico.1
Currently, the preliminary
determination is due no later than
September 4, 2014.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.205(b)(1) require the
Department to issue the preliminary
determination in an AD investigation no
1 See Sugar from Mexico: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 22795
(April 24, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49496-49497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan. The period
of review (POR) is July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. On January 8,
2014, the Department published a notice rescinding the review with
respect to Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation.\1\ This review
covers the remaining respondent Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya), a
producer and exporter of PET Film from Taiwan. The Department
preliminarily determines that sales of subject merchandise have been
made below normal value (NV) by Nan Ya. Interested parties are invited
to comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From Taiwan: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79
FR 1362 (January 8, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page at (202) 482-1398; AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is PET Film. The PET Film
subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. A
full description of the scope of the order is contained in the
memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan;
2012-2013 Administrative Review'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price
is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the
following weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2012,
through June 30, 2013.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation............................... 1.56
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results
within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\2\ Pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no
later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\3\
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed not later than five days after the date for filing case
briefs.\4\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.\5\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using IA
ACCESS.\6\ In order to be properly filed, IA ACCESS must successfully
receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m.
Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via IA ACCESS, within 30 days after
the date of publication of this
[[Page 49497]]
notice.\7\ Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of this review.
If Nan Ya's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review
when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final
results of this review is above de minimis. Where the respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-
specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they
did not know that their merchandise it sold to a reseller was destined
for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate of 2.40 percent \8\
if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from
Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as corrected in 67 FR 46566
(July 15, 2002) (PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final Determination).
\9\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of PET Film from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will
be required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters is 2.40 percent.\10\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: August 14, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Comparisons to Normal Value
5. Product Comparisons
6. Date of Sale
7. Export Price
8. Normal Value
9. Currency Conversion
10. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-19872 Filed 8-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P