Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 47695-47698 [2014-19224]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
contract is reasonable because the
Exchange believes the fee reduction will
encourage a greater number of market
participants to remove Customer
liquidity on Phlx. Customer orders bring
valuable liquidity to the market which
liquidity benefits other market
participants.
The Exchange’s proposal to decrease
the Customer Fee for Removing
Liquidity in Simple Orders for options
overlying SPY from $0.47 to $0.43 per
contract is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because all nonCustomer market participants will be
assessed a uniform Fee for Removing
Liquidity in Simple Orders for options
overlying SPY of $0.49 per contract.
Reducing the Customer Fee for
Removing Liquidity in SPY Simple
Orders is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because Customer
liquidity benefits all market participants
by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts Specialists
and Market Makers. An increase in the
activity of these market participants in
turn facilitates tighter spreads, which
may cause an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Phlx does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose an
undue burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that decreasing the
SPY Simple Order Customer Fee for
Removing Liquidity does not impose a
burden on competition, but rather that
the proposed rule change will attract
more Customer orders on Phlx. All nonCustomer market participants will
continue to be assessed the same fee to
remove SPY Simple Orders. The
Exchange believes that all market
participants benefit from increased
Customer liquidity on Phlx which
attracts Specialists and Market Makers.
An increase in the activity of Specialists
and Market Makers in turn facilitates
tighter spreads, which may cause an
additional corresponding increase in
order flow from other market
participants.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market, comprised of
twelve options exchanges, in which
market participants can easily and
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
rebates to be inadequate. Accordingly,
the fees that are assessed and the rebates
paid by the Exchange described in the
above proposal are influenced by these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Aug 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
robust market forces and therefore must
remain competitive with fees charged
and rebates paid by other venues and
therefore must continue to be reasonable
and equitably allocated to those
members that opt to direct orders to the
Exchange rather than competing venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.11 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2014–50 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–50. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2014–50, and should be submitted on or
before September 4, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–19223 Filed 8–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72798; File No. SR–MIAX–
2014–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
August 8, 2014.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on July 29, 2014, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
11 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47695
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
47696
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 2014 / Notices
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/
wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Priority Customer Rebate Program (the
‘‘Program’’) 3 to lower the per contract
credit for transactions in MIAX Select
Symbols 4 for tiers 1 and 2.
The Program is based on the
substantially similar fees of another
competing options exchange.5 Under
the Program, the Exchange credits each
Member the per contract amount set
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72356
(June 10, 2014), 79 FR 34384 (June 16, 2014) (SR–
MIAX–2014–26); 71698 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR
15185 (March 18, 2014) (SR–MIAX–2014–12);
71700 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15188 (March 18,
2014) (SR–MIAX–2014–13); 71283 (January 10,
2014), 79 FR 2914 (January 16, 2014) (SR–MIAX–
2013–63); 71009 (December 6, 2013), 78 FR 75629
(December 12, 2013) (SR–MIAX–2013–56).
4 The term ‘‘MIAX Select Symbols’’ means
options overlying AA, AAL, AAPL, AIG, AMZN,
AZN, BP, C, CBS, CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA,
EWJ, FB, FCX, FXI, GE, GILD, GLD, GM, GOOG,
GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM, IYR, JCP, JPM, KO, MO,
MRK, NFLX, NOK, NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG,
QCOM, QQQ, S, SIRI, SPY, SUNE, T, TSLA, USO,
VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB, XLE, XLF,
XLP, XLU and XOM.
5 See Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) Fees Schedule, p. 3. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66054
(December 23, 2011), 76 FR 82332 (December 30,
2011) (SR–CBOE–2011–120); 68887 (February 8,
2013), 78 FR 10647 (February 14, 2013) (SR–CBOE–
2013–017).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Aug 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
forth in the table located in the Fee
Schedule resulting from each Priority
Customer 6 order transmitted by that
Member which is executed on the
Exchange in all multiply-listed option
classes (excluding mini-options and
executions related to contracts that are
routed to one or more exchanges in
connection with the Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan referenced in Rule 1400), provided
the Member meets certain volume
thresholds in a month. For each Priority
Customer order transmitted by that
Member which is executed
electronically on the Exchange in MIAX
Select Symbols, MIAX shall credit each
member at the separate per contract rate
for MIAX Select Symbols. The volume
thresholds are calculated based on the
customer average daily volume over the
course of the month. Volume is
recorded for and credits are delivered to
the Member Firm that submits the order
to the Exchange. The Exchange
aggregates the contracts resulting from
Priority Customer orders transmitted
and executed electronically on the
Exchange from affiliated Members for
purposes of the thresholds above,
provided there is at least 75% common
ownership between the firms as
reflected on each firm’s Form BD,
Schedule A. In the event of a MIAX
System outage or other interruption of
electronic trading on MIAX, the
Exchange adjusts the national customer
volume in multiply-listed options for
the duration of the outage. A Member
may request to receive its credit under
the Program as a separate direct
payment.
The Exchange proposes to lower the
per contract credit for transactions in
MIAX Select Symbols for tiers 1 and 2.
Currently, the Exchange credits at the
$0.20 per contract rate for qualifying
Priority Customer transactions in MIAX
Select Symbols. The $0.20 per contract
credit is in lieu of the applicable credit
that would otherwise apply to the
transaction based on the volume
thresholds. The Exchange proposes
reducing the per contract credit to $0.00
for the tier 1 volume threshold and to
$0.10 for the tier 2 volume threshold.
The proposed changes align the per
contract credit for qualifying Priority
Customer transactions in MIAX Select
Symbols with the standard per contract
rate for transactions in non-MIAX Select
Symbols that occur in volume tiers 1
and 2. The $0.20 per contract credit will
6 The term ‘‘Priority Customer’’ means a person
or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) does not place more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during
a calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s).
See MIAX Rule 100.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
continue to be applied in lieu of the
applicable credit that would otherwise
apply to the transaction based on the
volume thresholds in tiers 3, 4, and 5.
The Exchange notes that all the other
aspects of the Program would continue
to apply to the credits (e.g., the
aggregation of volume of affiliates,
exclusion of contracts that are routed to
away exchanges, exclusion of minioptions . . . etc.).7
For example, if Member Firm ABC,
Inc. (‘‘ABC’’) has enough Priority
Customer contracts to achieve 0.4% of
the national customer volume in
multiply-listed option contracts during
the month of October, ABC will receive
a credit of $0.10 for each Priority
Customer contract executed in the
month of October. Any qualifying
Priority Customer transactions during
such month that occurred in AA, AAL,
AAPL, AIG, AMZN, AZN, BP, C, CBS,
CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA, EWJ,
FB, FCX, FXI, GE, GILD, GLD, GM,
GOOG, GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM, IYR,
JCP, JPM, KO, MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK,
NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG, QCOM, QQQ,
S, SIRI, SPY, SUNE, T, TSLA, USO,
VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB,
XLE, XLF, XLP, XLU and XOM would
be credited at the $0.10 per contact rate,
the same as the standard credit of $0.10.
In contrast, if Member Firm XYZ, Inc.
(‘‘XYZ’’) has enough Priority Customer
contracts to achieve 2.5% of the
national customer volume in multiplylisted option contracts during the month
of October, XYZ will receive a credit of
$0.18 for each Priority Customer
contract executed in the month of
October. However, any qualifying
Priority Customer transactions during
such month that occurred in AA, AAL,
AAPL, AIG, AMZN, AZN, BP, C, CBS,
CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA, EWJ,
FB, FCX, FXI, GE, GILD, GLD, GM,
GOOG, GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM, IYR,
JCP, JPM, KO, MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK,
NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG, QCOM, QQQ,
S, SIRI, SPY, SUNE, T, TSLA, USO,
VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB,
XLE, XLF, XLP, XLU and XOM would
be credited at the $0.20 per contact rate
versus the standard credit of $0.18.
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the Program are objective in
that the credits are based solely on
reaching stated volume thresholds. The
specific volume thresholds of the tiers
7 See MIAX Options Fee Schedule, p. 3. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72356 (June
10, 2014), 79 FR 34384 (June 16, 2014) (SR–MIAX–
2014–26); 71698 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15185
(March 18, 2014) (SR–MIAX–2014–12); 71700
(March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15188 (March 18, 2014)
(SR–MIAX–2014–13); 71283 (January 10, 2014), 79
FR 2914 (January 16, 2014) (SR–MIAX–2013–63);
71009 (December 6, 2013), 78 FR 75629 (December
12, 2013) (SR–MIAX–2013–56).
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 2014 / Notices
were set based upon business
determinations and an analysis of
current volume levels. The specific
volume thresholds and rates were set in
order to encourage Members to reach for
higher tiers. The purpose of the
amendment to the Program is to further
encourage Members to direct greater
Priority Customer trade volume to the
Exchange in these high volume symbols.
Increased Priority Customer volume will
provide for greater liquidity, which
benefits all market participants on the
Exchange. The practice of incentivizing
increased retail customer order flow in
order to attract professional liquidity
providers (Market-Makers) is, and has
been, commonly practiced in the
options markets. As such, marketing fee
programs,8 and customer posting
incentive programs,9 are based on
attracting public customer order flow.
The practice of providing additional
incentives to increase order flow in high
volume symbols is, and has been,
commonly practiced in the options
markets.10 The Program similarly
intends to attract Priority Customer
order flow, which will increase
liquidity, thereby providing greater
trading opportunities and tighter
spreads for other market participants
and causing a corresponding increase in
order flow from such other market
participants in these select symbols.
Increasing the number of orders sent to
the Exchange will in turn provide
tighter and more liquid markets, and
therefore attract more business overall.
The credits paid out as part of the
program will be drawn from the general
revenues of the Exchange.11 The
Exchange calculates volume thresholds
on a monthly basis.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the new transaction fees beginning
August 1, 2014.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its fee schedule is
8 See
MIAX Fee Schedule, Section 1(b).
NYSE Arca, Inc. Fees Schedule, page 4
(section titled ‘‘Customer Monthly Posting Credit
Tiers and Qualifications for Executions in Penny
Pilot Issues’’).
10 See International Securities Exchange, LLC,
Schedule of Fees, p. 6 (providing reduced fee rates
for order flow in Select Symbols); NASDAQ OMX
PHLX, Pricing Schedule, Section I (providing a
rebate for adding liquidity in SPY); NYSE Arca, Inc.
Fees Schedule, page 4 (section titled ‘‘Customer
Monthly Posting Credit Tiers and Qualifications for
Executions in Penny Pilot Issues’’).
11 Despite providing credits under the Program,
the Exchange represents that it will continue to
have adequate resources to fund its regulatory
program and fulfill its responsibilities as a selfregulatory organization while the Program will be
in effect.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Aug 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 12
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 13 in
particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees and other
charges among Exchange members.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal to modify the Program to lower
the credit for certain transactions in
MIAX Select Symbols is fair, equitable
and not unreasonably discriminatory.
The credit for transactions in the select
symbols is reasonably designed because
it will incent providers of Priority
Customer order flow to send that
Priority Customer order flow to the
Exchange in order to receive a credit in
a manner that enables the Exchange to
improve its overall competitiveness and
strengthen its market quality for all
market participants. The Program which
provides increased incentives in high
volume select symbols is also
reasonably designed to increase the
competitiveness of the Exchange with
other options exchanges that also offer
increased incentives to higher volume
symbols. The proposed changes to the
rebate Program are fair and equitable
and not unreasonably discriminatory
because they will apply equally to all
Priority Customer orders in the select
symbols. All similarly situated Priority
Customer orders in the select symbols
are subject to the same rebate schedule,
and access to the Exchange is offered on
terms that are not unfairly
discriminatory. In addition, the Program
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because, while only
Priority Customer order flow qualifies
for the Program, an increase in Priority
Customer order flow will bring greater
volume and liquidity, which benefit all
market participants by providing more
trading opportunities and tighter
spreads.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
change would increase both intermarket
and intramarket competition by
incenting Members to direct their
Priority Customer orders in the select
symbols to the Exchange, which will
enhance the quality of quoting and
increase the volume of contracts traded
here in those symbols. To the extent that
there is additional competitive burden
on non-Priority Customers or trading in
12 15
13 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47697
non-select symbols, the Exchange
believes that this is appropriate because
the proposed changes to the rebate
program should incent Members to
direct additional order flow to the
Exchange and thus provide additional
liquidity that enhances the quality of its
markets and increases the volume of
contracts traded here in those symbols.
To the extent that this purpose is
achieved, all the Exchange’s market
participants should benefit from the
improved market liquidity in such
select symbols. Enhanced market
quality and increased transaction
volume that results from the anticipated
increase in order flow directed to the
Exchange will benefit all market
participants and improve competition
on the Exchange in such select symbols.
The Exchange notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change reflects
this competitive environment because it
reduces the Exchange’s fees in a manner
that encourages market participants to
direct their customer order flow, to
provide liquidity, and to attract
additional transaction volume to the
Exchange. Given the robust competition
for volume among options markets,
many of which offer the same products,
implementing a volume based customer
rebate program to attract order flow like
the one being proposed in this filing is
consistent with the above-mentioned
goals of the Act. This is especially true
for the smaller options markets, such as
MIAX, which is competing for volume
with much larger exchanges that
dominate the options trading industry.
MIAX has a nominal percentage of the
average daily trading volume in options,
so it is unlikely that the customer rebate
program could cause any competitive
harm to the options market or to market
participants. Rather, the customer rebate
program is a modest attempt by a small
options market to attract order volume
away from larger competitors by
adopting an innovative pricing strategy.
The Exchange notes that if the rebate
program resulted in a modest percentage
increase in the average daily trading
volume in options executing on MIAX,
while such percentage would represent
a large volume increase for MIAX, it
would represent a minimal reduction in
volume of its larger competitors in the
industry. The Exchange believes that the
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
47698
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 2014 / Notices
proposal will help further competition,
because market participants will have
yet another additional option in
determining where to execute orders
and post liquidity if they factor the
benefits of a customer rebate program
into the determination.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.14 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2014–41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2014–41. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2014–41 and should be submitted on or
before September 4, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Aug 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/
wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[FR Doc. 2014–19224 Filed 8–13–14; 8:45 am]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72799; File No. SR–MIAX–
2014–40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
The Exchange proposes to amend its
current Priority Customer Rebate
Program (the ‘‘Program’’) to modify the
volume thresholds of tiers 1, 2, and 3.3
The Program is based on the
substantially similar fees of another
competing options exchange.4 Under
the Program, the Exchange shall credit
each Member the per contract amount
set forth in the table below resulting
from each Priority Customer 5 order
transmitted by that Member which is
executed on the Exchange in all
August 8, 2014.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on July 29, 2014, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
14 15
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72355
(June 10, 2014), 79 FR 34368 (June 16, 2014) (SR–
MIAX–2014–25); 71698 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR
15185 (March 18, 2014) (SR–MIAX–2014–12);
71283 (January 10, 2014), 79 FR 2914 (January 16,
2014) (SR–MIAX–2013–63); 71009 (December 6,
2013), 78 FR 75629 (December 12, 2013) (SR–
MIAX–2013–56).
4 See Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) Fees Schedule, p. 3. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66054
(December 23, 2011), 76 FR 82332 (December 30,
2011) (SR–CBOE–2011–120); 68887 (February 8,
2013), 78 FR 10647 (February 14, 2013) (SR–CBOE–
2013–017).
5 The term ‘‘Priority Customer’’ means a person
or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) does not place more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during
a calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s).
See MIAX Rule 100.
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47695-47698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19224]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72798; File No. SR-MIAX-2014-41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
August 8, 2014.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on July 29, 2014, Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
[[Page 47696]]
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee
Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/wotitle/rule_filing, at
MIAX's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Priority Customer Rebate Program
(the ``Program'') \3\ to lower the per contract credit for transactions
in MIAX Select Symbols \4\ for tiers 1 and 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72356 (June 10,
2014), 79 FR 34384 (June 16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-26); 71698 (March
12, 2014), 79 FR 15185 (March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-12); 71700
(March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15188 (March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-13);
71283 (January 10, 2014), 79 FR 2914 (January 16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-
2013-63); 71009 (December 6, 2013), 78 FR 75629 (December 12, 2013)
(SR-MIAX-2013-56).
\4\ The term ``MIAX Select Symbols'' means options overlying AA,
AAL, AAPL, AIG, AMZN, AZN, BP, C, CBS, CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA,
EWJ, FB, FCX, FXI, GE, GILD, GLD, GM, GOOG, GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM,
IYR, JCP, JPM, KO, MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK, NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG, QCOM,
QQQ, S, SIRI, SPY, SUNE, T, TSLA, USO, VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB,
XLE, XLF, XLP, XLU and XOM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Program is based on the substantially similar fees of another
competing options exchange.\5\ Under the Program, the Exchange credits
each Member the per contract amount set forth in the table located in
the Fee Schedule resulting from each Priority Customer \6\ order
transmitted by that Member which is executed on the Exchange in all
multiply-listed option classes (excluding mini-options and executions
related to contracts that are routed to one or more exchanges in
connection with the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan referenced in Rule 1400), provided the Member meets certain volume
thresholds in a month. For each Priority Customer order transmitted by
that Member which is executed electronically on the Exchange in MIAX
Select Symbols, MIAX shall credit each member at the separate per
contract rate for MIAX Select Symbols. The volume thresholds are
calculated based on the customer average daily volume over the course
of the month. Volume is recorded for and credits are delivered to the
Member Firm that submits the order to the Exchange. The Exchange
aggregates the contracts resulting from Priority Customer orders
transmitted and executed electronically on the Exchange from affiliated
Members for purposes of the thresholds above, provided there is at
least 75% common ownership between the firms as reflected on each
firm's Form BD, Schedule A. In the event of a MIAX System outage or
other interruption of electronic trading on MIAX, the Exchange adjusts
the national customer volume in multiply-listed options for the
duration of the outage. A Member may request to receive its credit
under the Program as a separate direct payment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'')
Fees Schedule, p. 3. See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
66054 (December 23, 2011), 76 FR 82332 (December 30, 2011) (SR-CBOE-
2011-120); 68887 (February 8, 2013), 78 FR 10647 (February 14, 2013)
(SR-CBOE-2013-017).
\6\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place
more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s). See MIAX Rule
100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to lower the per contract credit for
transactions in MIAX Select Symbols for tiers 1 and 2. Currently, the
Exchange credits at the $0.20 per contract rate for qualifying Priority
Customer transactions in MIAX Select Symbols. The $0.20 per contract
credit is in lieu of the applicable credit that would otherwise apply
to the transaction based on the volume thresholds. The Exchange
proposes reducing the per contract credit to $0.00 for the tier 1
volume threshold and to $0.10 for the tier 2 volume threshold. The
proposed changes align the per contract credit for qualifying Priority
Customer transactions in MIAX Select Symbols with the standard per
contract rate for transactions in non-MIAX Select Symbols that occur in
volume tiers 1 and 2. The $0.20 per contract credit will continue to be
applied in lieu of the applicable credit that would otherwise apply to
the transaction based on the volume thresholds in tiers 3, 4, and 5.
The Exchange notes that all the other aspects of the Program would
continue to apply to the credits (e.g., the aggregation of volume of
affiliates, exclusion of contracts that are routed to away exchanges,
exclusion of mini-options . . . etc.).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See MIAX Options Fee Schedule, p. 3. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 72356 (June 10, 2014), 79 FR 34384 (June
16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-26); 71698 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15185
(March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-12); 71700 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR
15188 (March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-13); 71283 (January 10, 2014),
79 FR 2914 (January 16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2013-63); 71009 (December 6,
2013), 78 FR 75629 (December 12, 2013) (SR-MIAX-2013-56).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, if Member Firm ABC, Inc. (``ABC'') has enough Priority
Customer contracts to achieve 0.4% of the national customer volume in
multiply-listed option contracts during the month of October, ABC will
receive a credit of $0.10 for each Priority Customer contract executed
in the month of October. Any qualifying Priority Customer transactions
during such month that occurred in AA, AAL, AAPL, AIG, AMZN, AZN, BP,
C, CBS, CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA, EWJ, FB, FCX, FXI, GE, GILD, GLD,
GM, GOOG, GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM, IYR, JCP, JPM, KO, MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK,
NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG, QCOM, QQQ, S, SIRI, SPY, SUNE, T, TSLA, USO,
VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB, XLE, XLF, XLP, XLU and XOM would be
credited at the $0.10 per contact rate, the same as the standard credit
of $0.10. In contrast, if Member Firm XYZ, Inc. (``XYZ'') has enough
Priority Customer contracts to achieve 2.5% of the national customer
volume in multiply-listed option contracts during the month of October,
XYZ will receive a credit of $0.18 for each Priority Customer contract
executed in the month of October. However, any qualifying Priority
Customer transactions during such month that occurred in AA, AAL, AAPL,
AIG, AMZN, AZN, BP, C, CBS, CLF, CMCSA, EBAY, EEM, EFA, EWJ, FB, FCX,
FXI, GE, GILD, GLD, GM, GOOG, GOOGL, HTZ, INTC, IWM, IYR, JCP, JPM, KO,
MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK, NQ, PBR, PCLN, PFE, PG, QCOM, QQQ, S, SIRI, SPY,
SUNE, T, TSLA, USO, VALE, WAG, WFC, WMB, WY, XHB, XLE, XLF, XLP, XLU
and XOM would be credited at the $0.20 per contact rate versus the
standard credit of $0.18.
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the Program are
objective in that the credits are based solely on reaching stated
volume thresholds. The specific volume thresholds of the tiers
[[Page 47697]]
were set based upon business determinations and an analysis of current
volume levels. The specific volume thresholds and rates were set in
order to encourage Members to reach for higher tiers. The purpose of
the amendment to the Program is to further encourage Members to direct
greater Priority Customer trade volume to the Exchange in these high
volume symbols. Increased Priority Customer volume will provide for
greater liquidity, which benefits all market participants on the
Exchange. The practice of incentivizing increased retail customer order
flow in order to attract professional liquidity providers (Market-
Makers) is, and has been, commonly practiced in the options markets. As
such, marketing fee programs,\8\ and customer posting incentive
programs,\9\ are based on attracting public customer order flow. The
practice of providing additional incentives to increase order flow in
high volume symbols is, and has been, commonly practiced in the options
markets.\10\ The Program similarly intends to attract Priority Customer
order flow, which will increase liquidity, thereby providing greater
trading opportunities and tighter spreads for other market participants
and causing a corresponding increase in order flow from such other
market participants in these select symbols. Increasing the number of
orders sent to the Exchange will in turn provide tighter and more
liquid markets, and therefore attract more business overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See MIAX Fee Schedule, Section 1(b).
\9\ See NYSE Arca, Inc. Fees Schedule, page 4 (section titled
``Customer Monthly Posting Credit Tiers and Qualifications for
Executions in Penny Pilot Issues'').
\10\ See International Securities Exchange, LLC, Schedule of
Fees, p. 6 (providing reduced fee rates for order flow in Select
Symbols); NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Pricing Schedule, Section I (providing a
rebate for adding liquidity in SPY); NYSE Arca, Inc. Fees Schedule,
page 4 (section titled ``Customer Monthly Posting Credit Tiers and
Qualifications for Executions in Penny Pilot Issues'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The credits paid out as part of the program will be drawn from the
general revenues of the Exchange.\11\ The Exchange calculates volume
thresholds on a monthly basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Despite providing credits under the Program, the Exchange
represents that it will continue to have adequate resources to fund
its regulatory program and fulfill its responsibilities as a self-
regulatory organization while the Program will be in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to implement the new transaction fees
beginning August 1, 2014.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its fee schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \12\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \13\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposal to modify the Program to
lower the credit for certain transactions in MIAX Select Symbols is
fair, equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory. The credit for
transactions in the select symbols is reasonably designed because it
will incent providers of Priority Customer order flow to send that
Priority Customer order flow to the Exchange in order to receive a
credit in a manner that enables the Exchange to improve its overall
competitiveness and strengthen its market quality for all market
participants. The Program which provides increased incentives in high
volume select symbols is also reasonably designed to increase the
competitiveness of the Exchange with other options exchanges that also
offer increased incentives to higher volume symbols. The proposed
changes to the rebate Program are fair and equitable and not
unreasonably discriminatory because they will apply equally to all
Priority Customer orders in the select symbols. All similarly situated
Priority Customer orders in the select symbols are subject to the same
rebate schedule, and access to the Exchange is offered on terms that
are not unfairly discriminatory. In addition, the Program is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because, while only Priority Customer
order flow qualifies for the Program, an increase in Priority Customer
order flow will bring greater volume and liquidity, which benefit all
market participants by providing more trading opportunities and tighter
spreads.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the
proposed change would increase both intermarket and intramarket
competition by incenting Members to direct their Priority Customer
orders in the select symbols to the Exchange, which will enhance the
quality of quoting and increase the volume of contracts traded here in
those symbols. To the extent that there is additional competitive
burden on non-Priority Customers or trading in non-select symbols, the
Exchange believes that this is appropriate because the proposed changes
to the rebate program should incent Members to direct additional order
flow to the Exchange and thus provide additional liquidity that
enhances the quality of its markets and increases the volume of
contracts traded here in those symbols. To the extent that this purpose
is achieved, all the Exchange's market participants should benefit from
the improved market liquidity in such select symbols. Enhanced market
quality and increased transaction volume that results from the
anticipated increase in order flow directed to the Exchange will
benefit all market participants and improve competition on the Exchange
in such select symbols. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract
order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change reflects this competitive environment because it reduces
the Exchange's fees in a manner that encourages market participants to
direct their customer order flow, to provide liquidity, and to attract
additional transaction volume to the Exchange. Given the robust
competition for volume among options markets, many of which offer the
same products, implementing a volume based customer rebate program to
attract order flow like the one being proposed in this filing is
consistent with the above-mentioned goals of the Act. This is
especially true for the smaller options markets, such as MIAX, which is
competing for volume with much larger exchanges that dominate the
options trading industry. MIAX has a nominal percentage of the average
daily trading volume in options, so it is unlikely that the customer
rebate program could cause any competitive harm to the options market
or to market participants. Rather, the customer rebate program is a
modest attempt by a small options market to attract order volume away
from larger competitors by adopting an innovative pricing strategy. The
Exchange notes that if the rebate program resulted in a modest
percentage increase in the average daily trading volume in options
executing on MIAX, while such percentage would represent a large volume
increase for MIAX, it would represent a minimal reduction in volume of
its larger competitors in the industry. The Exchange believes that the
[[Page 47698]]
proposal will help further competition, because market participants
will have yet another additional option in determining where to execute
orders and post liquidity if they factor the benefits of a customer
rebate program into the determination.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-MIAX-2014-41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-41. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-41 and should be
submitted on or before September 4, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-19224 Filed 8-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P