Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India and Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 45762-45763 [2014-18599]
Download as PDF
45762
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 6, 2014 / Notices
Background
On April 1, 2014, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the CVD
order on citric acid from the PRC
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1
The Department received a notice of
intent to participate in the review on
behalf of Archer Daniels Midland
Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and
Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC,
(collectively, ‘‘the domestic industry’’)
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of these
companies claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as a domestic producer of the
domestic like product.
The Department received adequate
substantive responses collectively from
the domestic industry within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did
not receive a substantive response from
any government or respondent
interested party to the proceeding.
Because the Department received no
response from the respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted an
expedited review of this CVD order,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is citric acid and certain citrate salts.
The product is currently classified
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) item
numbers 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000,
2918.15.5000, 3824.90.9290, and
3824.90.9290. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains dispositive.
For a full description of the scope, see
‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate
Salts from the People’s Republic of
China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated
concurrently with this final notice, and
hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues
and Decision Memorandum’’).
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy and the net countervailable
subsidy likely to prevail if the order
were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this expedited sunset review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via the Enforcement and
Compliance Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in
the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The issues discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
include the likelihood of continuation
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
CVD order on citric acid from the PRC
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy at the rates listed below:
Exporter/manufacturer
Net subsidy rate
TTCA Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Shandong TTCA Biochemistry Co., Ltd.)
Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd.; and Yixing Union Cogeneration Co., Ltd .................................................
Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................
All Others ...........................................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: July 30, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–18594 Filed 8–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–824, A–583–837, C–533–825]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From India and Taiwan:
Continuation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2014.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
AGENCY:
44.31 percent ad valorem.
36.46 percent ad valorem.
150.58 percent ad valorem.
39.77 percent ad valorem.
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
and countervailing duty orders on
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip (PET Film) from India and the
antidumping duty order on PET Film
from Taiwan, would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation for
these antidumping and countervailing
duty orders.
Contact Information: Jacqueline
Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 18279 (April 1, 2014).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 6, 2014 / Notices
Background
The Department initiated and the ITC
instituted sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on PET Film
from India and Taiwan and the
countervailing duty order on PET Film
from India, pursuant to section 751(c)
and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).1
As a result of its review, the
Department found that revocation of the
countervailing duty order would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
net countervailable subsidies, and
therefore, notified the ITC of the subsidy
rate were the order to be revoked.2 As
a result of its review, the Department
found that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on PET Film
from India and Taiwan would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC
of the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail were the orders to be
revoked.3
On July 22, 2014, the ITC published
its determination pursuant to sections
751(c) and 752 of the Act, that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on PET Film from India and
Taiwan would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the countervailing duty order on
PET Film from India would likely lead
to a continuation or recurrence of net
countervailable subsidies.4
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the
antidumping duty and countervailing
duty orders are all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed PET Film,
whether extruded or coextruded.
Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one
of their surfaces modified by the
application of a performance-enhancing
resinous or inorganic layer of more than
0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET
Film are currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item
number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
1 See Initiation of Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 19647 (April 2, 2013).
2 See Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet and Strip From India: Final Results of the
Expedited Second Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order, 78 FR 47276 (August 5,
2013).
3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and
Strip From India and Taiwan: Final Results of the
Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Orders and Correction to the Preliminary Results,
79 FR 12153 (March 4, 2014).
4 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and
Strip From India and Taiwan, 79 FR 42534 (July 22,
2014).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
written description of the scope of the
antidumping duty order is dispositive.
Scope Determinations
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders and the countervailing duty order
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and net
countervailable subsidies and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of these
antidumping duty orders on PET film
from India and Taiwan and the
countervailing duty order on PET Film
from India. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection will continue to collect
antidumping duty and countervailing
duty cash deposits at the rates in effect
at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of this order will be the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of this order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
This five-year (sunset) review and this
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: July 29, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–18599 Filed 8–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
5 See Notice of Scope Rulings, 70 FR 24533 (May
10, 2005).
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–853; A–570–937]
Since these orders were published,
there was one scope determination for
PET film from India, dated August 25,
2003. In this determination, requested
by International Packaging Films Inc.,
the Department determined that tracing
and drafting film is outside of the scope
of the order on PET Film from India.5
PO 00000
45763
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Canada and the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on citric
acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid)
from Canada and the People’s Republic
of China (PRC) would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping. The magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail is
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova or Katherine
Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1280 or (202) 482–4929,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 29, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty orders on citric acid
from Canada and the PRC.1 On April 1,
2014, the Department published the
notice of initiation of the first sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on citric acid from Canada and the PRC
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).2
On April 14, 2014, the Department
received Notices of Intent to Participate
in these reviews from the following
domestic producers of citric acid:
Archer Daniels Midland Company,
Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas LLC. (collectively,
‘‘the petitioners’’), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
The petitioners claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as manufacturers of a domestic like
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Canada and the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29,
2009).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR18279 (April 1, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45762-45763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18599]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-824, A-583-837, C-533-825]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India and
Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2014.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders
on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip (PET Film) from
India and the antidumping duty order on PET Film from Taiwan, would
likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation for these antidumping and
countervailing duty orders.
Contact Information: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 45763]]
Background
The Department initiated and the ITC instituted sunset reviews of
the antidumping duty orders on PET Film from India and Taiwan and the
countervailing duty order on PET Film from India, pursuant to section
751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five Year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 19647
(April 2, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of its review, the Department found that revocation of
the countervailing duty order would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of net countervailable subsidies, and therefore, notified
the ITC of the subsidy rate were the order to be revoked.\2\ As a
result of its review, the Department found that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on PET Film from India and Taiwan would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore,
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail were
the orders to be revoked.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet and Strip
From India: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order, 78 FR 47276 (August 5, 2013).
\3\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From
India and Taiwan: Final Results of the Second Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Orders and Correction to the Preliminary Results,
79 FR 12153 (March 4, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2014, the ITC published its determination pursuant to
sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, that revocation of the antidumping
duty order on PET Film from India and Taiwan would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the countervailing duty order
on PET Film from India would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of net countervailable subsidies.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From
India and Taiwan, 79 FR 42534 (July 22, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the antidumping duty and countervailing
duty orders are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed PET Film,
whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer
of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET Film are currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the
scope of the antidumping duty order is dispositive.
Scope Determinations
Since these orders were published, there was one scope
determination for PET film from India, dated August 25, 2003. In this
determination, requested by International Packaging Films Inc., the
Department determined that tracing and drafting film is outside of the
scope of the order on PET Film from India.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Notice of Scope Rulings, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the antidumping duty orders and the countervailing
duty order would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping
and net countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in
the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the
Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of these antidumping
duty orders on PET film from India and Taiwan and the countervailing
duty order on PET Film from India. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect antidumping duty and countervailing duty cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of this order will be the
date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
This five-year (sunset) review and this notice are in accordance
with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: July 29, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-18599 Filed 8-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P