Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Institutional Analysis of American Job Centers (AJCs) Study, 44869-44871 [2014-18184]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Washington, DC area, commenters
are strongly encouraged to transmit their
comments electronically via email or to
submit them by mail early. Comments,
including any personal information
provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB
approval of the information collection
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erika Liliedahl by telephone at 202–
693–5992 (this is not a toll-free number)
or by email at ChiefEvaluationOffice@
dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Trade Adjustment Assistance
Community College Career Training
(TAACCCT) grants program provides
community colleges and other eligible
institutions of higher education with
funds to expand and improve their
ability to deliver education and career
training programs that can be completed
in two years or less and are suited for
workers who are eligible for training
under the Trade Adjustment Assistance
for Workers program. TAACCCT-funded
programs assist participants in acquiring
the skills, degrees, and credentials
needed employment while also meeting
the needs of employers for skilled
workers. A total of 185 grants have been
awarded with 49 in fiscal year 2011
(‘‘Round 1’’), 79 in fiscal year 2012
(‘‘Round 2’’), and 57 in fiscal year 2013
(‘‘Round 3’’).
The purpose of the evaluation, funded
by the Chief Evaluation Office, is to
evaluate the national TAACCCT grants
program, using a mixed-method design
including outcome analysis, formal
implementation analysis, performance
assessment, and evaluability
assessment. All Round 2 and 3 grantees
and several Round 1 grantees have
independent third-party evaluations.
The national evaluator is collaborating
with grantees and their evaluators and
will provide a nationwide assessment of
the overall initiative.
This package requests clearance for an
online survey of all participating
TAACCCT colleges and structured
fieldwork in the form of site visits to 10
Round 2 and 10 Round 3 grantees.
The online survey is aimed at
developing a comprehensive description
of grant activities undertaken by
participating TAACCCT colleges, as
well as assessing the extent to which
grantees have achieved the main goals
under the initiative. Unlike the planned
site visits to a small select group of
TAACCCT grants, the online survey will
provide an opportunity to collect
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:09 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
responses to survey questions from all
colleges that are a part of the 178 Round
1–3 TAACCCT grants.
There are two primary data sources
for the structured fieldwork: Semistructured interviews and focus groups.
Interviews will be conducted with
college administrators, program
coordinators, faculty and instructional
staff, industry and community partners,
and employers. Field researchers will
use a modular interview guide,
organized by major topics that can be
adapted based on the respondent’s
knowledge base, to prompt discussions
on the approaches used and experiences
of the grantees and stakeholders. Inperson interviews will provide firsthand
about the experiences of those involved
in planning, implementing, and
participating in the programs and the
characteristics that contribute to success
or lack of success in addressing and
overcoming workforce challenges.
To understand the experiences and
perspectives of the participants in the
TAACCCT-funded activities, the
research team will conduct focus groups
of students at each site. Focus group
questions will be open-ended and
designed to elicit detailed responses.
From the focus groups with program
participants, researchers will learn
about their perceptions regarding the
training and service delivery approaches
including, recruitment and orientation
to the training or career path, supports
provided before and after training,
educational attainment and
employment, and satisfaction with the
training program.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Department of Labor is
soliciting comments concerning the
above data collection for the national
evaluation of the TAACCCT grants
program. Comments are requested to:
* Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
* evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
* enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
* minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44869
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
At this time, the Department of Labor
is requesting clearance for data
collection for the national evaluation of
the TAACCCT grants program via
survey and fieldwork efforts.
Type of review: New information
collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1205–0NEW.
Affected Public: Students
participating in and staff and partners
associated with implementing
TAACCCT grant programs.
Frequency: Once.
Total Responses: 1,440.
Average Time per Response: 76
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,824
hours.
Total Other Burden Cost: $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this request will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval; they
will also become a matter of public
record.
James H. Moore, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, U.S.
Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014–18179 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request;
Institutional Analysis of American Job
Centers (AJCs) Study
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Policy, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing collections
of information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that required
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
44870
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Notices
A copy of the proposed ICR can be
obtained by contacting the office listed
below in the addressee section of this
notice.
Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
September 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either one of the following methods:
Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov;
Mail or Courier: Erika Liliedahl, Chief
Evaluation Office, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room S–2312, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: Please submit one copy of
your comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the
agency name and OMB Control Number
identified above for this information
collection. Because we continue to
experience delays in receiving mail in
the Washington, DC area, commenters
are strongly encouraged to transmit their
comments electronically via email or to
submit them by mail early. Comments,
including any personal information
provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB
approval of the information collection
request.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erika Liliedahl by telephone at 202–
693–5992 (this is not a toll-free number)
or by email at ChiefEvaluationOffice@
dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
When Congress overhauled the
country’s public workforce system with
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) in
1998, its paramount goal was to replace
America’s fragmented and inefficient
patchwork of employment and training
programs with a more streamlined and
coordinated service delivery system. To
that end, WIA required that local
workforce investment boards (LWIBs)
establish centers—now known as
American Job Centers (AJCs)—to
provide ‘‘one-stop shopping’’ for
customers seeking employment
information and access to jobs, training,
and related services. While all AJCs
provide employment related services,
there is variation across centers in their
organization, partnering arrangements,
data reporting, funding, administration,
and service delivery. The U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) is
sponsoring a comprehensive study to
better understand the spectrum of
institutional features that shape AJCs’
day-to-day operations and customer
experiences.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:09 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
The goals of the Institutional Analysis
of American Job Centers (AJCs) study
are to systematically document key
institutional characteristics of AJCs;
present a comprehensive description of
AJC funding, organization,
administration and management, and
service delivery structures and
processes; and develop typologies of
AJCs that capture the institutional
variations documented.
To achieve these goals, an in-depth
institutional analysis will be conducted
that systematically documents AJCs’
operations across 10 research domains:
(1) Administrative structure; (2)
partnerships; (3) performance and
strategic management; (4) staffing; (5)
physical environment; (6) Management
Information S system capacity and the
use of technology, including electronic
tools and resources; (7) service delivery
structure and linkages; (8) the program
and service mix provided; (9) outreach;
and (10) funding. In addition, the study
will consider external factors that are
particularly important for
understanding AJC structure,
operations, policies, and processes.
These include LWIBs and state-level
workforce agencies that have
administrative and oversight
responsibilities over AJCs.
This package requests clearance for:
(1) Site visits to AJCs; (2) telephone
interviews with state workforce
administrators in states where site visits
are conducted; and (3) a network
analysis survey of selected study AJC
partner organizations.
The site visits include semi-structured
interviews, and observations of center
operations and client flow. Interviews
with state workforce administrators in
each state in which there is a selected
AJC will be conducted to gather statelevel information that is relevant for
understanding local-level AJC
organization and operations. A network
analysis of AJC partnerships will be
conducted based on a brief survey
administered to a subset of the AJCs
selected for site visits.
There are two primary data sources
for the study: Semi-structured
interviews and a survey. Semistructured telephone interviews will be
conducted with state workforce
administrators. In-person interviews
during the site visits will be conducted
with AJC managers and key partner
staff, AJC line staff, and LWIB staff;
telephone interviews will be conducted
in cases where an on-site meeting
cannot be arranged. Field researchers
will use a modular interview guide,
organized by major topics that can be
adapted based on the respondent’s
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
knowledge base, to prompt discussions
on topics of interest to the study.
To better understand relationships
between the AJC partners, the research
team will supplement information about
AJC partnerships obtained through
semi-structured interviews with a
network analysis survey of AJC partners
that is distributed through email in the
form of an editable PDF. The network
analysis survey is a brief, targeted tool
used to explore the strength of
relationships between the key entities
(partners) that oversee service delivery
within the AJC framework as part of the
overall effort to describe and analyze the
institutional characteristics of the AJC
system. The short survey will
systematically collect information on
select elements of partner interactions
(frequency of communication, level of
collaboration, and referral flow).
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Department of Labor is
soliciting comments concerning the
above data collection Institutional
Analysis of American Job Centers.
Comments are requested to:
* Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
* Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
* Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
* Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
At this time, the Department of Labor
is requesting clearance for data
collection for the Institutional Analysis
of AJCs via a survey and interviews.
Type of review: New information
collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1205–0NEW.
Affected Public: Members of the
public affected by the data collection
include state and local government
agencies, for-profit institutions, and notfor-profit institutions. Respondent
groups identified include (1) State,
regional, and local workforce agency
and (2) AJC partners.
Frequency: Once.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Notices
Total Responses: 1,643.
Average Time per Response: 60
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,643
hours.
Total Other Burden Cost: $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this request will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval; they
will also become a matter of public
record.
please contact the Office at 202–707–
8350 for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General
Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights, by email at jcharlesworth@
loc.gov or by telephone at 202–707–
8350; or Sarang V. Damle, Special
Advisor to the General Counsel, by
email at sdam@loc.gov or by telephone
at 202–707–8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
James H. Moore, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, U.S.
Department of Labor.
I. Background
The U.S. Copyright Office is
conducting a study to assess the
effectiveness of current methods for
licensing sound recordings and musical
works. The Office received written
comments responding to an initial
Notice of Inquiry, and held three public
roundtables in Nashville, Los Angeles
and New York. See 78 FR 13739 (Mar.
17, 2014); 79 FR 25626 (May 5, 2014).
On July 23, 2014, the Office published
a second Notice of Inquiry, seeking
additional written comments on ten
subjects concerning the music licensing
environment. 79 FR 42833. To ensure
commenters have sufficient time to
address the topics set forth in the July
2014 Notice of Inquiry, the Office is
extending the time for filing written
comments from August 22, 2014 to
September 12, 2014.
[FR Doc. 2014–18184 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
[Docket No. 2014–03]
Music Licensing Study
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of extension of comment
period.
AGENCY:
The United States Copyright
Office is extending the deadline for
public comments regarding the
effectiveness of existing methods of
licensing music that were solicited in a
July 23, 2014 Notice of Inquiry. See 79
FR 42833 (July 23, 2014).
DATES: Written comments are now due
on or before September 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: All comments shall be
submitted electronically. A comment
page containing a comment form is
posted on the Office Web site at
https://www.copyright.gov/docs/
musiclicensingstudy. The Web site
interface requires commenting parties to
complete a form specifying their name
and organization, as applicable, and to
upload comments as an attachment via
a browser button. To meet accessibility
standards, commenting parties must
upload comments in a single file not to
exceed six megabytes (MB) in one of the
following formats: The Portable
Document File (PDF) format that
contains searchable, accessible text (not
an image); Microsoft Word;
WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or
ASCII text file format (not a scanned
document). The form and face of the
comments must include both the name
of the submitter and organization. The
Office will post the comments publicly
on the Office’s Web site in the form that
they are received, along with associated
names and organizations. If electronic
submission of comments is not feasible,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:09 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: July 28, 2014.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2014–18096 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
U.S. Copyright Office
[Docket No. 2014–02]
Extension of Comment Period; Study
on the Right of Making Available;
Request for Additional Comments
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Copyright Office is
extending the deadline for public
comments that address topics listed in
the Office’s July 15, 2014 Request for
Additional Comments.
DATES: Comments are now due no later
than 5:00 p.m. EDT on September 15,
2014.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be
submitted electronically. To submit
comments, please visit https://
www.copyright.gov/docs/making_
available/. The Web site interface
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
44871
requires submitters to complete a form
specifying name and organization, as
applicable, and to upload comments as
an attachment via a browser button. To
meet accessibility standards,
commenting parties must upload
comments in a single file not to exceed
six megabytes (‘‘MB’’) in one of the
following formats: a Portable Document
File (‘‘PDF’’) format that contains
searchable, accessible text (not an
image); Microsoft Word; WordPerfect;
Rich Text Format (‘‘RTF’’); or ASCII text
file format (not a scanned document).
The form and face of the comments
must include both the name of the
submitter and organization. The Office
will post all comments publicly on the
Office’s Web site exactly as they are
received, along with names and
organizations. If electronic submission
of comments is not feasible, please
contact the Office at 202–707–1027 for
special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Strong, Senior Counsel for Policy
and International Affairs, by telephone
at 202–707–1027 or by email at
mstrong@loc.gov, or Kevin Amer,
Counsel for Policy and International
Affairs, by telephone at 202–707–1027
or by email at kamer@loc.gov.
On July
15, 2014, the Copyright Office issued a
Request for Additional Comments on
the state of U.S. law recognizing and
protecting ‘‘making available’’ and
‘‘communication to the public’’ rights
for copyright holders.1 The Request
listed several questions for interested
members of the public to address in the
context of U.S. implementation of the
WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the
WIPO Performances and Phonograms
Treaty (WPPT) rights of ‘‘making
available’’ and ‘‘communication to the
public,’’ and also invited views on
specific issues raised during the public
roundtable held in Washington, DC on
May 5, 2014. To provide sufficient time
for commenters to respond, the Office is
extending the time for filing additional
comments from August 14, 2014 to
September 15, 2014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 28, 2014.
Karyn A. Temple Claggett,
Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2014–18097 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
1 Study on the Right of Making Available; Request
for Additional Comments, 79 FR 41309 (July 15,
2014).
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44869-44871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18184]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Institutional Analysis of American Job Centers
(AJCs) Study
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program
helps to ensure that required data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
[[Page 44870]]
A copy of the proposed ICR can be obtained by contacting the office
listed below in the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before September 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following
methods: Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Erika
Liliedahl, Chief Evaluation Office, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-
2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
Please submit one copy of your comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the agency name and OMB Control
Number identified above for this information collection. Because we
continue to experience delays in receiving mail in the Washington, DC
area, commenters are strongly encouraged to transmit their comments
electronically via email or to submit them by mail early. Comments,
including any personal information provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized and/or included in the request for
OMB approval of the information collection request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erika Liliedahl by telephone at 202-
693-5992 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at
ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
When Congress overhauled the country's public workforce system with
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) in 1998, its paramount goal was to
replace America's fragmented and inefficient patchwork of employment
and training programs with a more streamlined and coordinated service
delivery system. To that end, WIA required that local workforce
investment boards (LWIBs) establish centers--now known as American Job
Centers (AJCs)--to provide ``one-stop shopping'' for customers seeking
employment information and access to jobs, training, and related
services. While all AJCs provide employment related services, there is
variation across centers in their organization, partnering
arrangements, data reporting, funding, administration, and service
delivery. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is sponsoring a
comprehensive study to better understand the spectrum of institutional
features that shape AJCs' day-to-day operations and customer
experiences.
The goals of the Institutional Analysis of American Job Centers
(AJCs) study are to systematically document key institutional
characteristics of AJCs; present a comprehensive description of AJC
funding, organization, administration and management, and service
delivery structures and processes; and develop typologies of AJCs that
capture the institutional variations documented.
To achieve these goals, an in-depth institutional analysis will be
conducted that systematically documents AJCs' operations across 10
research domains: (1) Administrative structure; (2) partnerships; (3)
performance and strategic management; (4) staffing; (5) physical
environment; (6) Management Information S system capacity and the use
of technology, including electronic tools and resources; (7) service
delivery structure and linkages; (8) the program and service mix
provided; (9) outreach; and (10) funding. In addition, the study will
consider external factors that are particularly important for
understanding AJC structure, operations, policies, and processes. These
include LWIBs and state-level workforce agencies that have
administrative and oversight responsibilities over AJCs.
This package requests clearance for: (1) Site visits to AJCs; (2)
telephone interviews with state workforce administrators in states
where site visits are conducted; and (3) a network analysis survey of
selected study AJC partner organizations.
The site visits include semi-structured interviews, and
observations of center operations and client flow. Interviews with
state workforce administrators in each state in which there is a
selected AJC will be conducted to gather state-level information that
is relevant for understanding local-level AJC organization and
operations. A network analysis of AJC partnerships will be conducted
based on a brief survey administered to a subset of the AJCs selected
for site visits.
There are two primary data sources for the study: Semi-structured
interviews and a survey. Semi-structured telephone interviews will be
conducted with state workforce administrators. In-person interviews
during the site visits will be conducted with AJC managers and key
partner staff, AJC line staff, and LWIB staff; telephone interviews
will be conducted in cases where an on-site meeting cannot be arranged.
Field researchers will use a modular interview guide, organized by
major topics that can be adapted based on the respondent's knowledge
base, to prompt discussions on topics of interest to the study.
To better understand relationships between the AJC partners, the
research team will supplement information about AJC partnerships
obtained through semi-structured interviews with a network analysis
survey of AJC partners that is distributed through email in the form of
an editable PDF. The network analysis survey is a brief, targeted tool
used to explore the strength of relationships between the key entities
(partners) that oversee service delivery within the AJC framework as
part of the overall effort to describe and analyze the institutional
characteristics of the AJC system. The short survey will systematically
collect information on select elements of partner interactions
(frequency of communication, level of collaboration, and referral
flow).
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Department of Labor is soliciting comments
concerning the above data collection Institutional Analysis of American
Job Centers. Comments are requested to:
* Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
* Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
* Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
* Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of
responses.
III. Current Actions
At this time, the Department of Labor is requesting clearance for
data collection for the Institutional Analysis of AJCs via a survey and
interviews.
Type of review: New information collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1205-0NEW.
Affected Public: Members of the public affected by the data
collection include state and local government agencies, for-profit
institutions, and not-for-profit institutions. Respondent groups
identified include (1) State, regional, and local workforce agency and
(2) AJC partners.
Frequency: Once.
[[Page 44871]]
Total Responses: 1,643.
Average Time per Response: 60 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,643 hours.
Total Other Burden Cost: $0.
Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval; they will also become a matter of public record.
James H. Moore, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014-18184 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-P
