Final Priority; National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-Research Fellowships Program (Also Known as the Mary E. Switzer Research Fellowships), 43653-43655 [2014-17707]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: July 23, 2014.
Melody Musgrove,
Director, Office of Special Education
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–17718 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED–2014–OSERS–0041]
Final Priority; National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation
Research—Research Fellowships
Program (Also Known as the Mary E.
Switzer Research Fellowships)
[CFDA Number: 84.133F–2.]
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a priority for the
Research Fellowships Program
administered by the National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR). Specifically, this
notice announces a priority for a
Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship. We
take this action to focus attention on an
area of national need. We intend the
priority to build research capacity by
providing support to highly qualified,
experienced researchers, including
those who are individuals with
disabilities, to conduct policy research
in the areas of disability and
rehabilitation.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This priority is
effective August 27, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Barrett, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5142, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700.
Telephone: (202) 245–6211 or by email:
patricia.barrett@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Research Fellowships Program is to
build research capacity by providing
support to experienced, highly qualified
individuals, including those who are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
individuals with disabilities, to perform
research on the rehabilitation of
individuals with disabilities.
Fellows must conduct original
research in an area authorized by
section 204 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended (the Act). Section 204
of the Act authorizes research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, the purposes of which
are to develop methods, procedures, and
rehabilitation technology that maximize
the full inclusion and integration into
society, employment, independent
living, family support, and economic
and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals
with the most significant disabilities,
and to improve the effectiveness of
services authorized under the Act.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(e).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed
priority (NPP) for this program in the
Federal Register on June 03, 2014 (79
FR 31898). That notice contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing the particular priority.
There are no differences between the
proposed priority and this final priority.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the NPP we did not receive
any comments on the proposed priority.
Final Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
proposes a new priority for a
Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship as part
of NIDRR’s Research Fellowship
Program (also known as the Mary E.
Switzer Research Fellowships). The
goals of this proposed priority are: (1)
To provide experienced disability and
rehabilitation researchers with
opportunities to enhance their
knowledge and understanding of the
public policy-making process and the
effects of public policy on the outcomes
of individuals with disabilities; (2) to
enhance the capacity of disability and
rehabilitation researchers to conduct
and disseminate relevant disability
policy research; (3) to increase the
integration and use of research findings
in shaping disability-related policy; and
4) to increase awareness of disabilityrelated issues in public policy
discussions, formulations, and reviews.
Consistent with the goals of this
program, an applicant for a
Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship must
include:
(a) An Eligibility Statement that
demonstrates that you meet the
eligibility requirements in 34 CFR part
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43653
356.2(c)(1), including relevant
publications and prior research
experience; and that provides sufficient
information in order to evaluate your
qualifications consistent with 34 CFR
part 356.30(a).
(b) A plan for how you will fulfill the
full-time equivalent requirement for a
Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship and
the requirement to work a minimum of
50 percent of the time in an agency or
office within the Executive or
Legislative branches of the Federal
government, in the Washington, DC
metropolitan area.
Note: As described in 34 CFR 356.41,
fellows will work full-time on authorized
fellowship activities. The application
package for this priority provides a thorough
description of how NIDRR defines and
administers the full-time equivalent
requirement for this program, as well as the
50 percent residential requirement.
(c) A letter of support from a potential
mentor at an agency or office within the
Executive or Legislative branches of the
Federal Government where your
fellowship will be based. The letter of
support from the potential mentor
should indicate the mentor’s capacity
and willingness to facilitate your
fellowship placement should you be
awarded the Distinguished Residential
Disability and Rehabilitation Policy
Fellowship.
(d) An assurance that you will commit
to spending at least 50 percent of the
time during the period of the fellowship
at an agency or office within the
Executive or Legislative branches of the
Federal government in the Washington,
DC metropolitan area, receiving
orientation, conducting research, and
providing expertise related to disability
and rehabilitation research.
(e) A description of a proposed
Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship
research project that includes the
following:
(1) A brief history or literature review
of the disability issue, as appropriate;
identification of the relevant recent
legislative, regulatory, or administrative
actions and the policy options related to
this topic; and a rationale for the
importance of the topic to improving the
well-being of individuals with
disabilities in one or more of NIDRR’s
primary outcome domains: Community
Living and Participation, Employment,
and Health and Function.
(2) Specific objectives and research
questions or hypotheses that will guide
the project, the methods you will use to
conduct the research, and the proposed
timeline for implementing the project.
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
43654
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(3) A plan for how the results of the
project will be disseminated and used to
influence policy.
Note: Fellows funded under this
program are responsible for ensuring
that their conduct does not violate
Federal anti-lobbying requirements (see
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE2011-title18/USCODE-2011-title18partI-chap93-sec1913) during the period
of their fellowship.
Note: The costs associated with carrying
out this residential policy practicum are
intended to be covered, in full or in part, by
the Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship Award;
however, the fellow is responsible for paying
for any costs that exceed the amount of the
award.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from
proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this final
regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing this final priority only
on a reasoned determination that its
benefits justify its costs. In choosing
among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Based on the analysis that follows, the
Department believes that this regulatory
action is consistent with the principles
in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
The benefits of the Research
Fellowships Program have been well
established over the years. Projects
similar to the Research Fellowships
Program have been completed
successfully, and the proposed priority
will generate new capacity in the area
of rehabilitation and disability policy
research.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: July 23, 2014
Melody Musgrove,
Director, Office of Special Education
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–17707 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0072; FRL–9913–62–
OAR]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Correction
In rule document 2014–16556,
appearing on pages 41437–41438, in the
issue of Wednesday, July 16, 2014, make
the following correction:
On page 41437, in the first column,
the subject heading is corrected to read
as set forth above.
[FR Doc. C1–2014–16556 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0791; FRL–9914–22–
Region–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Bellefontaine
Area To Attainment of the 2008 Lead
Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
On October 29, 2013, the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
(OEPA) submitted a request for the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to redesignate the Bellefontaine
nonattainment area to attainment for the
2008 national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS or standards) for
lead. EPA determined that the
Bellefontaine area meets the
requirements for redesignation and is
also approving several additional
related actions. EPA is approving, as
revisions to the Ohio state
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
implementation plan (SIP), the state’s
plan for maintaining the 2008 lead
NAAQS through 2025 for the area. EPA
is approving the 2010 emissions
inventory for the Bellefontaine area,
which meet the comprehensive
emissions inventory requirement of the
Act. EPA is approving to take these
actions in accordance with the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
implementation regulations regarding
the 2008 lead NAAQS.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
September 26, 2014, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by August
27, 2014. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0791, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408–2279.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano,
Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013–
0791. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43655
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Sarah
Arra, Environmental Scientist, at (312)
886–9401 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–9401,
arra.sarah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What actions is EPA taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. What are the criteria for redesignation to
attainment?
IV. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s
request?
V. What are the effects of EPA’s actions?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA taking?
EPA is taking several actions related
to the redesignation of the Bellefontaine
area to attainment for the 2008 lead
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43653-43655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED-2014-OSERS-0041]
Final Priority; National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research--Research Fellowships Program (Also Known as
the Mary E. Switzer Research Fellowships)
[CFDA Number: 84.133F-2.]
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services announces a priority for the Research
Fellowships Program administered by the National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Specifically, this
notice announces a priority for a Distinguished Residential Disability
and Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship. We take this action to focus
attention on an area of national need. We intend the priority to build
research capacity by providing support to highly qualified, experienced
researchers, including those who are individuals with disabilities, to
conduct policy research in the areas of disability and rehabilitation.
DATES: Effective Date: This priority is effective August 27, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Barrett, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5142, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700. Telephone: (202) 245-6211 or by
email: patricia.barrett@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Research Fellowships Program
is to build research capacity by providing support to experienced,
highly qualified individuals, including those who are individuals with
disabilities, to perform research on the rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities.
Fellows must conduct original research in an area authorized by
section 204 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (the Act).
Section 204 of the Act authorizes research, demonstration projects,
training, and related activities, the purposes of which are to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the
full inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent
living, family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of
individuals with disabilities, especially individuals with the most
significant disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Act.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(e).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
We published a notice of proposed priority (NPP) for this program
in the Federal Register on June 03, 2014 (79 FR 31898). That notice
contained background information and our reasons for proposing the
particular priority.
There are no differences between the proposed priority and this
final priority.
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPP we did not
receive any comments on the proposed priority.
Final Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a new priority for a Distinguished Residential
Disability and Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship as part of NIDRR's
Research Fellowship Program (also known as the Mary E. Switzer Research
Fellowships). The goals of this proposed priority are: (1) To provide
experienced disability and rehabilitation researchers with
opportunities to enhance their knowledge and understanding of the
public policy-making process and the effects of public policy on the
outcomes of individuals with disabilities; (2) to enhance the capacity
of disability and rehabilitation researchers to conduct and disseminate
relevant disability policy research; (3) to increase the integration
and use of research findings in shaping disability-related policy; and
4) to increase awareness of disability-related issues in public policy
discussions, formulations, and reviews.
Consistent with the goals of this program, an applicant for a
Distinguished Residential Disability and Rehabilitation Policy
Fellowship must include:
(a) An Eligibility Statement that demonstrates that you meet the
eligibility requirements in 34 CFR part 356.2(c)(1), including relevant
publications and prior research experience; and that provides
sufficient information in order to evaluate your qualifications
consistent with 34 CFR part 356.30(a).
(b) A plan for how you will fulfill the full-time equivalent
requirement for a Distinguished Residential Disability and
Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship and the requirement to work a minimum
of 50 percent of the time in an agency or office within the Executive
or Legislative branches of the Federal government, in the Washington,
DC metropolitan area.
Note: As described in 34 CFR 356.41, fellows will work full-time
on authorized fellowship activities. The application package for
this priority provides a thorough description of how NIDRR defines
and administers the full-time equivalent requirement for this
program, as well as the 50 percent residential requirement.
(c) A letter of support from a potential mentor at an agency or
office within the Executive or Legislative branches of the Federal
Government where your fellowship will be based. The letter of support
from the potential mentor should indicate the mentor's capacity and
willingness to facilitate your fellowship placement should you be
awarded the Distinguished Residential Disability and Rehabilitation
Policy Fellowship.
(d) An assurance that you will commit to spending at least 50
percent of the time during the period of the fellowship at an agency or
office within the Executive or Legislative branches of the Federal
government in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, receiving
orientation, conducting research, and providing expertise related to
disability and rehabilitation research.
(e) A description of a proposed Distinguished Residential
Disability and Rehabilitation Policy Fellowship research project that
includes the following:
(1) A brief history or literature review of the disability issue,
as appropriate; identification of the relevant recent legislative,
regulatory, or administrative actions and the policy options related to
this topic; and a rationale for the importance of the topic to
improving the well-being of individuals with disabilities in one or
more of NIDRR's primary outcome domains: Community Living and
Participation, Employment, and Health and Function.
(2) Specific objectives and research questions or hypotheses that
will guide the project, the methods you will use to conduct the
research, and the proposed timeline for implementing the project.
[[Page 43654]]
(3) A plan for how the results of the project will be disseminated
and used to influence policy.
Note: Fellows funded under this program are responsible for
ensuring that their conduct does not violate Federal anti-lobbying
requirements (see www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title18/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap93-sec1913) during the period of their
fellowship.
Note: The costs associated with carrying out this residential
policy practicum are intended to be covered, in full or in part, by
the Distinguished Residential Disability and Rehabilitation Policy
Fellowship Award; however, the fellow is responsible for paying for
any costs that exceed the amount of the award.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely
to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this final regulatory action under Executive
Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing this final priority only on a reasoned determination
that its benefits justify its costs. In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that maximize net
benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes
that this regulatory action is consistent with the principles in
Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
The benefits of the Research Fellowships Program have been well
established over the years. Projects similar to the Research
Fellowships Program have been completed successfully, and the proposed
priority will generate new capacity in the area of rehabilitation and
disability policy research.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced
[[Page 43655]]
search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents
published by the Department.
Dated: July 23, 2014
Melody Musgrove,
Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-17707 Filed 7-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P