Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and China; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews, 42049-42050 [2014-16930]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–515–521 and 731–TA–1251–1257 (Preliminary)] Certain Steel Nails From India, Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, Turkey, and Vietnam sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determined, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam of certain steel nails, provided for in subheading 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and 7317.00.75 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), and that are allegedly subsidized by the Governments of Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam.2 The Commission further determined that imports of these products from India and Turkey are negligible pursuant to section 771(24) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(24)). The Commission consequently terminated its investigations concerning steel nails from India and Turkey. Commencement of Final Phase Investigations Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations of steel nails from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the Department of Commerce (Commerce) of affirmative preliminary determinations in these investigations under sections 703(b) or 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determinations are negative, upon notice of affirmative final determinations in these investigations under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigations to which they are parties. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigations. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Background SUMMARY: On May 29, 2014, a petition was filed with the Commission and Commerce by Mid Continent Nail Corporation, Poplar Bluff, MO, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV and subsidized imports of certain steel nails from India, Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, Turkey, and Vietnam. Accordingly, effective May 29, 2014, the Commission instituted countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–515–521 and antidumping duty investigation Nos. 731–TA–1251– 1257 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of June 4, 2014 (79 FR 32311). The conference was held in Washington, DC, on June 19, 2014, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on July 14, 2014. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4480 (July 2014), entitled Certain Steel Nails from India, Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, Turkey, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. 701–TA–515–521 and 731–TA–1251–1257). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 14, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–16880 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner F. Scott Kieff recused himself from these investigations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 23:20 Jul 17, 2014 Jkt 232001 42049 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Investigations Nos. 701–TA–456 and 731– TA–1151–1152 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and China; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada and China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for these reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2014, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. With respect to the antidumping duty order on Canada, the Commission found that both the domestic group response and the respondent group response to its notice of institution (79 FR 18311, April 1, 2014) were adequate and determined to conduct a full review. With respect to the antidumping and countervailing E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1 42050 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Notices duty orders on China, the Commission found that the domestic group response was adequate and that the respondent group response was inadequate, but that circumstances warranted full reviews. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statement will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: July 15, 2014. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–16930 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–868] Certain Wireless Devices With 3G and/ or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof; Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Regarding Substitution of Respondents U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 116), substituting Microsoft Mobility OY (‘‘MMO’’) for one of the two Nokia respondents. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 23:20 Jul 17, 2014 Jkt 232001 persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 5, 2013, based on a complaint filed by InterDigital Communications, Inc. of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, as well as InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., and InterDigital Holdings, Inc., each of Wilmington, Delaware (collectively, ‘‘InterDigital’’). 78 FR 8191 (Feb. 5, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of the infringement of certain claims from seven United States Patents. The notice of institution named ten respondents including Nokia, Inc. of White Plains, New York; and Nokia Corp. of Espoo, Finland (collectively, ‘‘Nokia’’). On September 2, 2013, Microsoft Corp. (‘‘Microsoft’’), through an affiliate, entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement with Nokia Corp. (‘‘the Purchase Agreement’’). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Microsoft subsidiary Microsoft Mobility OY (‘‘MMO’’) acquired substantially all of Nokia’s Devices & Services Business, which includes all of Nokia’s mobile device business, including smartphones. Those assets include the entirety of respondent Nokia, Inc. as well as substantial assets from Nokia Corp., which maintains other lines of business, including network equipment and mapping technology. Microsoft also agreed to acquire all liabilities of Nokia Corp. from pending litigations including this investigation. Microsoft has assumed control of defending this investigation. On May 20, 2014, Nokia and MMO moved to substitute MMO for Nokia, Inc. and Nokia Corp. On May 30, 2013, InterDigital and the Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed responses in opposition. On June 13, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 116), which substituted MMO for Nokia, Inc. but not for Nokia Corp. On June 23, 2014, the respondents (Nokia, Inc.; Nokia Corp.; and MMO) filed a petition for review of Order No. 116, seeking substitution as to Nokia Corp. as well. On June 30, 2014, InterDigital and the IA filed oppositions to the respondents’ petition. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The Commission notes that pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(c), 19 CFR 210.21(c), Nokia Corp. may enter into a consent order to PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 terminate its participation in this investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 14, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–16881 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1122–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection Office on Violence Against Women, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 79, Number 86, pages 25619– 25620, on May 5, 2014, allowing for a 60 day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 days until August 18, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Cathy Poston, Attorney Advisor, Office on Violence Against Women, 145 N Street NE., Washington, DC 20530 (phone:202–514–5430). Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington DC 20503 or send email to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM 18JYN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42049-42050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701-TA-456 and 731-TA-1151-1152 (Review)]


Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and China; 
Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with 
full reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts 
from Canada and China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A 
schedule for these reviews will be established and announced at a later 
date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews 
and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

DATES:  Effective Date: July 7, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Cassise (202-708-5408), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2014, the Commission determined 
that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. With respect to the antidumping 
duty order on Canada, the Commission found that both the domestic group 
response and the respondent group response to its notice of institution 
(79 FR 18311, April 1, 2014) were adequate and determined to conduct a 
full review. With respect to the antidumping and countervailing

[[Page 42050]]

duty orders on China, the Commission found that the domestic group 
response was adequate and that the respondent group response was 
inadequate, but that circumstances warranted full reviews. A record of 
the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and 
any individual Commissioner's statement will be available from the 
Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.

    Authority:  These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    Issued: July 15, 2014.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-16930 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.