Solid Urea from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 40063-40065 [2014-16313]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 2014 / Notices
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii), the Department
received notices of intent to participate
in this sunset review from Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition and
Husqvarna Construction Products North
America (collectively, the domestic
interested parties) within 15 days after
the date of publication of the Initiation
Notice.1 The domestic interested parties
claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(A), (C), and (F) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
The Department received adequate
substantive responses to the Initiation
Notice from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department received no substantive
response from any respondent
interested parties. In accordance with
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
and may also enter under 6804.21.00.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description is
dispositive. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.2
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, including the likelihood
1 See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 72061 (December 2, 2013) (Initiation Notice) and
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China and the Republic of
Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145
(November 4, 2009).
2 See the Memorandum from Deputy Assistant
Secretary Christian Marsh to Acting Assistant
Secretary Ronald K. Lorentzen entitled ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China’’ dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:23 Jul 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping in the event of revocation and
the magnitude of dumping margins
likely to prevail if the order was
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this
review and the corresponding
recommendations in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and to
all parties in the Central Records Unit
in Room 7046 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
The Department determines that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on diamond sawblades from the
PRC would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at weighted-average margins up to
164.09 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
The Department is issuing and
publishing the final results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(c),
752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: July 7, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–16307 Filed 7–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40063
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–821–801]
Solid Urea from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on solid urea
from the Russian Federation (Russia).
The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2012, through June 30, 2013. The review
covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise, MCC EuroChem
(EuroChem). We preliminarily find that
EuroChem has not sold subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the POR. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: July 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerrold Freeman or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0180 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is solid urea. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States (HTSUS)
item number 3102.10.00.00. The HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum from
Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Solid Urea from
the Russian Federation’’ dated
concurrently with this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The written description is dispositive.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
40064
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 2014 / Notices
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a dumping
margin of 0.00 percent exists for
EuroChem for the period July 1, 2012,
through June 30, 2013.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may
submit cases briefs not later than 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed
not later than five days after the date for
filing case briefs.1 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.2
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
1 See
19 CFR 351.309(d).
and 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
requirements).
2 Id.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:23 Jul 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.3 Requests
should contain: (1) The party’s name,
address and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If EuroChem’s weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for an
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of such sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
If EuroChem’s weighted-average
dumping margin continues to be zero or
de minimis in the final results of review,
we will instruct CBP not to assess duties
on any of its entries in accordance with
the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin
of dumping for the exporter is
determined to be zero or de minimis, no
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 4
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.5 This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by EuroChem
for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate of 64.93
percent 6 if there is no rate for the
19 CFR 351.310(c).
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
5 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
6 The all-others rate established in Urea From the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; Final
PO 00000
3 See
4 See
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of solid urea
from Russia entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for EuroChem will be the
rate established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
manufacturer of the merchandise for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for
all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 64.93 percent.7 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 3, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 52
FR 19557 (May 26, 1987).
7 See Id.
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 2014 / Notices
D. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
E. Product Comparisons
F. Date of Sale
G. Constructed Export Price
H. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
2. Level of Trade
3. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
I. Currency Conversion
J. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–16313 Filed 7–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD364
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
AGENCY:
The New England Fishery
Management Council’s (Council) Risk
Policy Working Group will meet to
consider actions affecting New England
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ).
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 10 a.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Hampton Inn & Suites, 2100 Post
Road, Warwick, RI; telephone: (401)
739–8888.
Council address: New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management
Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The items
of discussion in the committee and
advisory panel’s agenda are: The Risk
Policy Working Group will continue the
development of a risk policy to serve as
guidance for ABC (acceptable biological
catch) control rules and annual catch
limits (ACLs) for Council-managed
species. They will develop a Risk Policy
Statement, to be reviewed by the
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) in August and
approved by the Council at its
September 2014 meeting. Also on the
agenda will be the review and
discussion on baseline conditions
related to overfishing definitions, ABC
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:23 Jul 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
control rules, and harvest control rules
in Council-managed FMPs. They will
discuss the next steps for applying the
Risk Policy Statement across Councilmanaged FMPs and address other
business as necessary.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may be
discussed, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically identified in
this notice and any issues arising after
publication of this notice that require
emergency action under section 305(c)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Thomas A. Nies (see ADDRESSES) at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 8, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–16214 Filed 7–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD373
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
AGENCY:
The Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Pacific Council)
Highly Migratory Species Management
Team (HMSMT) will hold a webinar,
which is open to the public.
DATES: The HMSMT will hold the
webinar on Tuesday, July 29, 2014 from
9 a.m. to noon, Pacific Time.
ADDRESSES: To attend the webinar, visit
https://www.joinwebinar.com. Enter the
Webinar ID: 493–503–175, and your
name and email address (required).
Once you have joined the webinar,
choose either your computer’s audio or
select ‘‘Use Telephone.’’ If you do not
select ‘‘Use Telephone’’ you will be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40065
connected to audio using your
computer’s microphone and speakers
(VolP). It is recommended that you use
a computer headset, as GoToMeeting
allows you to listen to the meeting using
your computer headset and speakers. If
you do not have a headset and speakers,
you may use your telephone for the
audio portion of the meeting by dialing
this TOLL number 1–480–297–0021 (not
a toll-free number); phone audio access
code 861–856–225; audio phone pin
shown after joining the webinar. System
requirements for PC-based attendees:
Required: Windows® 7, Vista, or XP; for
Mac®-based attendees: Required: Mac
OS® X 10.5 or newer; and for mobile
attendees: Required: iPhone®, iPad®,
AndroidTM phone or Android tablet (See
the GoToMeeting Webinar Apps). You
may also send an email to Mr. Kris
Kleinschmidt or contact him at 503–
820–2280 for technical assistance. A
listening station will also be provided at
the Pacific Council office.
Council address: Pacific Council,
7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101,
Portland, OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Kit Dahl, Pacific Council; telephone:
(503) 820–2422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
HMSMT will discuss the development
of alternatives and analyses for issues to
be addressed as part of the HMS
biennial harvest specifications and
management measures process. Of the
issues identified at the June Pacific
Council meeting, the Pacific Council
assigned highest priority to reducing
recreational catch of Pacific bluefin tuna
and identifying take caps (‘‘hard caps’’)
for selected protected species (marine
mammals and sea turtles) for the
California drift gillnet fishery. The
HMSMT may also discuss exempted
fishing permit review and monitoring
requirements for proposed management
measures. The HMSMT will report on
their work at the September 12–17,
2014, Council meeting in Spokane, WA.
Public comments during the webinar
will be received from attendees at the
discretion of the HMSMT Chair.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in the meeting agenda may be
discussed, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically listed in this
document and any issues arising after
publication of this document that
require emergency action under section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the intent to take final action to address
the emergency.
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 133 (Friday, July 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40063-40065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16313]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-821-801]
Solid Urea from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solid urea from
the Russian Federation (Russia). The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2012, through June 30, 2013. The review covers one producer/exporter of
the subject merchandise, MCC EuroChem (EuroChem). We preliminarily find
that EuroChem has not sold subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on
these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: July 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerrold Freeman or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0180 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is solid urea. The product is
currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the
United States (HTSUS) item number 3102.10.00.00. The HTSUS subheading
is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of
the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary
Taverman, Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Solid Urea from the
Russian Federation'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The
written description is dispositive.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
[[Page 40064]]
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as
an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions,
see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for EuroChem for the period July
1, 2012, through June 30, 2013.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\1\ Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\2\ Id., and 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the
Department's electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\3\
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If EuroChem's weighted-
average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results
of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total entered value
of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If EuroChem's
weighted-average dumping margin continues to be zero or de minimis in
the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties
on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for
Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping
for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping
duties will be assessed.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14,
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\5\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by EuroChem for which it did not
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate of 64.93 percent \6\ if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
\6\ The all-others rate established in Urea From the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics; Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 52 FR 19557 (May 26, 1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of solid urea from Russia entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
EuroChem will be the rate established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the manufacturer of the merchandise for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 64.93 percent.\7\ These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 3, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
[[Page 40065]]
D. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
E. Product Comparisons
F. Date of Sale
G. Constructed Export Price
H. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
2. Level of Trade
3. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
I. Currency Conversion
J. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-16313 Filed 7-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P