BMO Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application, 39010-39015 [2014-15971]

Download as PDF 39010 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants’ Conditions Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following conditions:7 1. Before a Subadvised Series may rely on the order requested in the application, the operation of the Subadvised Series in the manner described in the application, including the hiring of Wholly-Owned SubAdvisers, will be, or has been, approved by a majority of the Subadvised Series’ outstanding voting securities as defined in the Act, or, in the case of a new Subadvised Series whose public shareholders purchase shares on the basis of a prospectus containing the disclosure contemplated by condition 2 below, by the sole initial shareholder before offering the Subadvised Series’ shares to the public. 2. The prospectus for each Subadvised Series will disclose the existence, substance, and effect of any order granted pursuant to the application. Each Subadvised Series will hold itself out to the public as employing the multi-manager structure described in the application. Each prospectus will prominently disclose that the Adviser has the ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight by the Board, to oversee the Sub-Advisers and recommend their hiring, termination and replacement. 3. The Adviser will provide general management services to a Subadvised Series, including overall supervisory responsibility for the general management and investment of the Subadvised Series’ assets. Subject to review and approval of the Board, the Adviser will (a) set a Subadvised Series’ overall investment strategies, (b) evaluate, select, and recommend SubAdvisers to manage all or a portion of a Subadvised Series’ assets, and (c) implement procedures reasonably designed to ensure that Sub-Advisers comply with a Subadvised Series’ investment objective, policies and restrictions. Subject to review by the Board, the Adviser will (a) when appropriate, allocate and reallocate a Subadvised Series’ assets among multiple Sub-Advisers; and (b) monitor and evaluate the performance of SubAdvisers. 4. A Subadvised Series will not make any Ineligible Sub-Adviser Changes 7 Applicants will only comply with conditions 7, 8, 9 and 12 if they rely on the relief that would allow them to provide Aggregate Fee Disclosure. VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 without the approval of the shareholders of the applicable Subadvised Series. 5. Subadvised Series will inform shareholders of the hiring of a new SubAdviser within 90 days after the hiring of the new Sub-Adviser pursuant to the Modified Notice and Access Procedures. 6. At all times, at least a majority of the Board will be Independent Board Members, and the selection and nomination of new or additional Independent Board Members will be placed within the discretion of the thenexisting Independent Board Members. 7. Independent Legal Counsel, as defined in rule 0–1(a)(6) under the Act, will be engaged to represent the Independent Board Members. The selection of such counsel will be within the discretion of the then-existing Independent Board Members. 8. The Adviser will provide the Board, no less frequently than quarterly, with information about the profitability of the Adviser on a per Subadvised Series basis. The information will reflect the impact on profitability of the hiring or termination of any sub-adviser during the applicable quarter. 9. Whenever a sub-adviser is hired or terminated, the Adviser will provide the Board with information showing the expected impact on the profitability of the Adviser. 10. Whenever a sub-adviser change is proposed for a Subadvised Series with an Affiliated Sub-Adviser or a WhollyOwned Sub-Adviser, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, will make a separate finding, reflected in the Board minutes, that such change is in the best interests of the Subadvised Series and its shareholders, and does not involve a conflict of interest from which the Adviser or the Affiliated Sub-Adviser or Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser derives an inappropriate advantage. 11. No Board member or officer of a Subadvised Series, or director or officer of the Adviser, will own directly or indirectly (other than through a pooled investment vehicle that is not controlled by such person), any interest in a SubAdviser, except for (a) ownership of interests in the Adviser or any entity, other than a Wholly-Owned SubAdviser, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Adviser, or (b) ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding securities of any class of equity or debt of a publicly traded company that is either a SubAdviser or an entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a Sub-Adviser. PO 00000 Frm 00161 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12. Each Subadvised Series will disclose the Aggregate Fee Disclosure in its registration statement. 13. In the event the Commission adopts a rule under the Act providing substantially similar relief to that requested in the application, the requested order will expire on the effective date of that rule. 14. Any new Sub-Advisory Agreement or any amendment to a Subadvised Series’ existing Investment Management Agreement or SubAdvisory Agreement that directly or indirectly results in an increase in the aggregate advisory rate payable by the Subadvised Series will be submitted to the Subadvised Series’ shareholders for approval. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–15970 Filed 7–8–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 31146; File No. 812–14217] BMO Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application July 2, 2014. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to (a) section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) granting an exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements. AGENCY: SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION: Applicants request an order that would permit certain registered open-end management investment companies to participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility. APPLICANTS: BMO Fund, Inc. (‘‘Company’’ or ‘‘BMO’’), BMO Asset Management Corp. (‘‘Adviser’’), and BMO Harris Bank N.A. (‘‘Bank’’). DATES: Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 25, 2013, and amended on February 14, 2014 and June 6, 2014. Applicants have agreed to file an amendment during the notice period, E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices the substance of which is reflected in this notice. HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission’s Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on July 28, 2014, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Commission’s Secretary. ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC, 20549–1090; Applicants: c/o BMO Funds, Inc., 111 East Kilbourn Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emerson S. Davis, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–6868 or Daniele Marchesani, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained via the Commission’s Web site by searching for the file number, or for an applicant using the Company name box, at https:// www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551–8090. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Applicants’ Representations 1. The Company is organized as a Wisconsin corporation and is registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company. The Company consists of multiple series, three of which comply with Rule 2a–7 under the Act and hold themselves out as money market funds (‘‘Money Market Funds’’). BMO Asset Management Corp. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BMO Financial Corp, which is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank of Montreal, a Canadian bank holding company. BMO Asset Management Corp. is, and any other Adviser will be registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (‘‘Advisers Act’’) and serve as the investment adviser to the Funds.1 The 1 Applicants request that the relief apply to each existing and future series of the Company, any other registered open-end investment company or series VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 Adviser may engage one or more affiliated or unaffiliated subadvisers and each will be registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act or not be subject to registration. BMO Harris Bank, an affiliate of BMO Asset Management Corp. and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BMO Financial Corp., serves as custodian for the Company and the Funds. 2. At any particular time, while some Funds are entering into repurchase agreements, or purchasing other shortterm instruments, other Funds may need to borrow money from the same or similar banks for temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ‘‘fail’’ in which cash payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other temporary purposes. The Company, on behalf of the Funds, has entered into a Loan Agreement, as amended, with State Street Bank & Trust Company (the ‘‘Loan Agreement’’) under which the Company has access to a $50 million standby line of credit on behalf of the Funds. 3. When a Fund borrows money from a bank or under the Loan Agreement, it pays interest on the loan at a rate that is higher than the rate that is earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds on investments in repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments of the same maturity as the bank loan or loan under the Loan Agreement. Applicants assert that this differential represents the profit earned by the lender on loans and is not attributable to any material difference in the credit quality or risk of such transactions. 4. The Funds seek to enter into master interfund lending agreements (‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’) with each other that would permit each Fund to lend money directly to and borrow money directly from other Funds through a credit facility for temporary purposes. The Money Market Funds will not participate as borrowers in the proposed credit facility. Applicants state that the proposed credit facility would both reduce the Funds’ potential borrowing costs and enhance the ability thereof (‘‘Funds’’) for which BMO Asset Management Corp., including any successor entity thereto, or a person controlling, controlled by, or under common control (within the meaning of section 2(a)(9) of the Act) with BMO Asset Management Corp. serves as investment adviser (collectively, the ‘‘Adviser’’); and (c) BMO Asset Management Corp. The term ‘‘successor’’ is limited to entities that result from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the type of business organization. All entities that currently intend to rely on the requested relief are named as applicants. Any other entity that relies on the order in the future will comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the application. PO 00000 Frm 00162 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39011 of the lending Funds to earn higher rates of interest on their short-term lendings. Although the proposed credit facility would reduce the Funds’ need to borrow from banks, the Funds would be free to establish and maintain committed lines of credit or other borrowing arrangements with unaffiliated banks. 5. Applicants anticipate that the proposed credit facility would provide a borrowing Fund with significant savings at times when the cash position of the borrowing Fund is insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. This situation could arise when shareholder redemptions exceed anticipated volumes and certain Funds have insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such redemptions. When the Funds liquidate portfolio securities to meet redemption requests, they often do not receive payment in settlement for up to three days (or longer for certain foreign transactions). However, redemption requests normally are effected immediately. The proposed credit facility would provide a source of immediate, short-term liquidity pending settlement of the sale of portfolio securities. 6. Applicants also anticipate that a Fund could use the proposed credit facility when a sale of securities ‘‘fails’’ due to circumstances beyond the Fund’s control, such as a delay in the delivery of cash to the Fund’s custodian or improper delivery instructions by the broker effecting the transaction. ‘‘Sales fails’’ may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to purchase a security using the proceeds from securities sold. Alternatively, the Fund could ‘‘fail’’ on its intended purchase due to lack of funds from the previous sale, resulting in additional cost to the Fund, or sell a security on a same-day settlement basis, earning a lower return on the investment. Use of the proposed credit facility under these circumstances would enable the Fund to have access to immediate short-term liquidity. 7. While bank borrowings could generally supply needed cash to cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the proposed credit facility, a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than those that would be payable under short-term loans offered by banks. In addition, Funds making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain from investing their cash in repurchase agreements or purchasing shares of a money market fund. Thus, applicants assert that the proposed credit facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds. E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 39012 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices 8. The interest rate to be charged to the Funds on any Interfund Loan (the ‘‘Interfund Loan Rate’’) would be the average of the ‘‘Repo Rate’’ and the ‘‘Bank Loan Rate,’’ both as defined below. The Repo Rate for any day would be the highest rate available to a lending Fund, directly or through a joint account, from investment in overnight repurchase agreements. The Bank Loan Rate for any day would be calculated by the Credit Facility Team (as defined below) each day an Interfund Loan is made according to a formula established by each Fund’s board of directors (the ‘‘Board’’) and intended to approximate the lowest interest rate at which bank short-term loans would be available to the Funds. The formula would be based upon a publicly available rate (e.g., federal funds plus 25 basis points) and would vary with this rate so as to reflect changing bank loan rates. The initial formula and any subsequent modifications to the formula would be subject to the approval of each Fund’s Board. In addition, each Fund’s Board would periodically review the continuing appropriateness of using the formula to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the relationship between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates that would be available to the Funds. 9. The proposed credit facility would be administered by the Funds’ president, chief compliance officer and treasurer and chief compliance officer and an investment professional within the Adviser who serves as a portfolio manager for the Money Market Funds (the ‘‘Money Market Manager’’) (collectively, the ‘‘Credit Facility Team’’). No other portfolio manager of any Fund will serve as a member of the Credit Facility Team. On any day on which a Fund intends to borrow money, the Credit Facility Team would make an Interfund Loan from a lending Fund to a borrowing Fund only if the Interfund Loan Rate is (i) more favorable to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of any money market fund in which a lending Fund could otherwise invest and (ii) more favorable to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate. Under the proposed credit facility, the portfolio managers for each participating Fund could provide standing instructions to participate daily as a borrower or lender. The Money Market Funds would not participate as borrowers. The Credit Facility Team on each business day would collect data on the uninvested cash and borrowing requirements of all participating Funds. The Credit Facility Team would allocate loans among VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 borrowing Funds without any further communication from the portfolio managers of the Funds (other than the Money Market Manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of the Credit Facility Team). All allocations made by the Credit Facility Team will require the approval of at least one member of the Credit Facility Team, who is a high level employee and who is not the Money Market Manager. Applicants anticipate that there typically will be far more available uninvested cash each day than borrowing demand. Therefore, after the Credit Facility Team has allocated cash for Interfund Loans, any remaining cash will be invested in accordance with the standing instructions of portfolio managers or such remaining amounts will be invested directly by the portfolio managers of the Funds and returned to the Funds. 10. The Credit Facility Team would allocate borrowing demand and cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Credit Facility Team believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of filing requests to participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and the need to minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative costs. To reduce transaction costs, each InterFund Loan normally would be allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of participants necessary to complete the loan transaction. The method of allocation and related administrative procedures would be approved by each Fund’s Board, including a majority of directors who are not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Fund, as that term is defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act (‘‘Independent Directors’’), to ensure that both borrowing and lending Funds participate on an equitable basis. 11. The Credit Facility Team would: (a) Monitor the Interfund Loan Rate and the other terms and conditions of the loans; (b) limit the borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that they comply with the Fund’s investment policies and limitations; (c) ensure equitable treatment of each Fund; and (d) make quarterly reports to each Fund’s Board concerning any transactions by the Fund under the proposed credit facility and the Interfund Loan Rate charged. 12. The Adviser and BMO Harris Bank, through the Credit Facility Team, would administer the proposed credit facility as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its duties under the relevant advisory or administrative contract with each Fund and would receive no additional fee as compensation for its PO 00000 Frm 00163 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 services in connection with the administration of the proposed credit facility. They may collect standard pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping and accounting fees associated with the transfer of cash and/or securities in connection with repurchase and lending transactions generally, including transactions effected through the proposed credit facility. Such fees would be no higher than those applicable for comparable bank loan transactions. 13. No Fund may participate in the proposed credit facility unless: (a) The Fund has obtained shareholder approval for its participation, if such approval is required by law; (b) the Fund has fully disclosed all material information concerning the credit facility in its prospectus and/or statement of additional information; and (c) the Fund’s participation in the credit facility is consistent with its investment objectives, limitations and organizational documents. 14. In connection with the credit facility, applicants request an order under section 6(c) of the Act exempting them from the provisions of sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act exempting them from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act exempting them from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and under section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements. Applicants’ Legal Analysis 1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated person of a registered investment company, or affiliated person of an affiliated person, from borrowing money or other property from the registered investment company. Section 21(b) of the Act generally prohibits any registered management company from lending money or other property to any person, directly or indirectly, if that person controls or is under common control with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act defines an ‘‘affiliated person’’ of another person, in part, to be any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act defines ‘‘control’’ as the ‘‘power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company,’’ but excludes circumstances in which ‘‘such power is solely the result of an official position with such company.’’ Applicants state that the Funds may be under common control by virtue of having the Adviser as their common investment adviser E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices and/or by having common officers, directors and/or trustees. 2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be granted where an exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed transaction from section 17(a) provided that the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy of the investment company as recited in its registration statement and reports filed under the Act, and with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the proposed arrangements satisfy these standards for the reasons discussed below. 3. Applicants assert that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act were intended to prevent a party with strong potential adverse interests to, and some influence over the investment decisions of, a registered investment company from causing or inducing the investment company to engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the benefit of such party and that are detrimental to the best interests of the investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that the proposed credit facility transactions do not raise these concerns because: (a) The Adviser and BMO Harris Bank, through the Credit Facility Team, would administer the program as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its duties under the relevant advisory contract with each Fund and a disinterested party, respectively, as part of its duties under the relevant advisory or administrative contract with each Fund; (b) all Interfund Loans would consist only of uninvested cash reserves that the lending Fund otherwise would invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments either directly or through a money market fund; (c) the Interfund Loans would not involve a significantly greater risk than other such investments; (d) the lending Fund would receive interest at a rate higher than it could otherwise obtain through such other investments; and (e) the borrowing Fund would pay interest at a rate lower than otherwise available to it under its bank loan agreements and avoid the upfront commitment fees associated with committed lines of credit. Moreover, applicants assert that the other terms VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 and conditions that applicants propose also would effectively preclude the possibility of any Fund obtaining an undue advantage over any other Fund. 4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of such a person, from selling securities or other property to the investment company. Section 17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of such a person, from purchasing securities or other property from the investment company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally prohibits a registered investment company from purchasing or otherwise acquiring any security issued by any other investment company except in accordance with the limitations set forth in that section. 5. Applicants state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay an Interfund Loan could be deemed to constitute a security for the purposes of sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of the Act. Applicants also state that a pledge of assets in connection with an Interfund Loan could be construed as a purchase of the borrowing Fund’s securities or other property for purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt persons or transactions from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the extent that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors. Applicants contend that the standards under sections 6(c), 17(b), and 12(d)(1)(J) are satisfied for all the reasons set forth above in support of their request for relief from sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) and for the reasons discussed below. Applicants also state that the requested relief from section 17(a)(2) of the Act meets the standards of section 6(c) and 17(b) because any collateral pledged to secure an Interfund Loan would be subject to the same conditions imposed by any other lender to a Fund that imposes conditions on the quality of or access to collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is another Fund) or the same or better conditions (in any other circumstance). 6. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was intended to prevent the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid imposing on investors additional and duplicative costs and fees attendant upon multiple layers of investments. Applicants submit that the proposed credit facility does not involve these abuses. Applicants note that there will be no duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or their shareholders, and that the Adviser and BMO Harris Bank PO 00000 Frm 00164 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39013 will receive no additional compensation for its services in administering the credit facility. Applicants also note that the purpose of the proposed credit facility is to provide economic benefits for all the participating Funds and their shareholders. 7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is permitted to borrow from any bank, provided, that immediately after the borrowing, there is asset coverage of at least 300 per centum for all borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term ‘‘senior security’’ generally includes any bond, debenture, note or similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief under section 6(c) from section 18(f)(1) to the limited extent necessary to permit a Fund to lend to or borrow directly from other Funds. 8. Applicants believe that granting relief under section 6(c) is appropriate because the Funds would remain subject to the requirement of section 18(f)(1) that all borrowings of a Fund, including combined interfund and bank borrowings, have at least 300% asset coverage. Based on the conditions and safeguards described in the application, applicants also submit that to allow the Funds to borrow from other Funds pursuant to the proposed credit facility is consistent with the purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1). 9. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act generally prohibit an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of such a person, when acting as principal, from effecting any joint transaction in which the investment company participates, unless, upon application, the transaction has been approved by the Commission. Rule 17d– 1(b) under the Act provides that in passing upon an application filed under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the participation of the registered investment company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement, or profit-sharing plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of the other participants. 10. Applicants assert that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid overreaching by and unfair advantage to insiders. Applicants assert that the proposed credit facility is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both reduced E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 39014 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms consistent with its investment policies and fundamental investment limitations. Applicants assert that each Fund’s participation in the proposed credit facility would be on terms that are no different from or less advantageous than that of other participating Funds. Applicants’ Conditions Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the average of the Repo Rate and the Bank Loan Rate. 2. On each business day, the Credit Facility Team will compare the Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and will make cash available for Interfund Loans only if the Interfund Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate; and, if applicable, the yield of the highest yielding money market fund in which the lending Fund could otherwise invest and (b) more favorable to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate. 3. If a Fund has outstanding bank borrowings, any Interfund Loans to the Fund: (a) will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than the interest rate of any outstanding bank loan; (b) will be secured at least on an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires collateral; (c) will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding bank loan (and in any event not over seven days); and (d) will provide that, if an event of default by the Fund occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank loan to the Fund, that event of default will automatically (without need for action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate event of default under the Interfund Lending Agreement entitling the lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan (and exercise all rights with respect to any collateral) and that such call will be made if the lending bank exercises its right to call its loan under its agreement with the borrowing Fund. 4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the proposed credit facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets, provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the Fund’s interfund VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 borrowing will be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a Fund’s total outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through the proposed credit facility only on a secured basis. A Fund may not borrow through the proposed credit facility or from any other source if its total outstanding borrowings immediately after the interfund borrowing would be more than 33 1/3% of its total assets. 5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may, through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceed 10% of its total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset value or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of its outstanding Interfund Loans; (b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its total assets; or (c) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund’s total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets, at which time the collateral called for by this condition (5) shall no longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding at any time that a Fund’s total outstanding borrowings exceed 10% is repaid or the Fund’s total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to market each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is necessary to maintain the market value of the collateral that secures each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the outstanding principal value of the Interfund Loan. 6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the proposed credit facility if the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the proposed credit facility to exceed 15% of the lending Fund’s current net assets at the time of the loan. 7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the lending Fund’s net assets. PO 00000 Frm 00165 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more than seven days. Loans effected within seven days of each other will be treated as separate loan transactions for purposes of this condition. 9. A Fund’s borrowings through the proposed credit facility, as measured on the day when the most recent loan was made, will not exceed the greater of 125% of the Fund’s total net cash redemptions for the preceding seven calendar days or 102% of the Fund’s sales fails for the preceding seven calendar days. 10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day’s notice by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund. 11. A Fund’s participation in the proposed credit facility must be consistent with its investment objectives and limitations and organizational documents. 12. The Credit Facility Team will calculate total Fund borrowing and lending demand through the proposed credit facility, and allocate loans on an equitable basis among the Funds, without the intervention of any portfolio manager of the Funds (other than the Money Market Manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of the Credit Facility Team). All allocations will require the approval of at least one member of the Credit Facility Team, who is a high level employee and who is not the Money Market Manager. The Credit Facility Team will not solicit cash for the proposed credit facility from any Fund or prospectively publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio managers (except to the extent that the Money Market Manager has access to loan demand data). The Credit Facility Team will invest any amounts remaining after satisfaction of borrowing demand in accordance with the instructions of each of the relevant portfolio manager or such remaining amounts will be invested directly by the portfolio managers of the Funds or the Credit Facility Team will return remaining amounts to the Funds. 13. The Credit Facility Team will monitor the interest rates charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and will make a quarterly report to the Board of each Fund concerning the participation of the Funds in the proposed credit facility and the terms and other conditions of any extensions of credit under the credit facility. 14. The Board of each Fund, including a majority of the Independent Directors, will: E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Notices (a) Review, no less frequently than quarterly, each Fund’s participation in the proposed credit facility during the preceding quarter for compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such transactions; (b) establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to determine the interest rate on Interfund Loans and review, no less frequently than annually, the continuing appropriateness of the Bank Loan Rate formula; and (c) review, no less frequently than annually, the continuing appropriateness of the Fund’s participation in the proposed credit facility. 15. In the event an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its terms and the default is not cured within two business days from its maturity or from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment under the provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Credit Facility Team will promptly refer the loan for arbitration to an independent arbitrator selected by the Board of each Fund involved in the loan who will serve as arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund Loans.2 The arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly, and the arbitrator’s decision will be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator will submit, at least annually, a written report to the Board of each Fund setting forth a description of the nature of any dispute and the actions taken by the Funds to resolve the dispute. 16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction by it under the proposed credit facility occurred, the first two years in an easily accessible place, written records of all such transactions setting forth a description of the terms of the transactions, including the amount, the maturity and the Interfund Loan Rate, the rate of interest available at the time each Interfund Loan is made on overnight repurchase agreements and bank borrowings, the yield of any money market fund in which the lending Fund could otherwise invest, and such other information presented to the Fund’s Board in connection with the review required by conditions 13 and 14. 17. The Credit Facility Team will prepare and submit to the Board of each Fund for review an initial report describing the operations of the proposed credit facility and the 2 If the dispute involves Funds with different Boards of Directors, the respective Board of each Fund will select an independent arbitrator that is satisfactory to each Fund. VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:08 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 procedures to be implemented to ensure that all Funds are treated fairly. After the commencement of the proposed credit facility, the Credit Facility Team will report on the operations of the proposed credit facility at each Board’s quarterly meetings. Each Fund’s chief compliance officer, as defined in Rule 38a–1(a)(4) under the Act, shall prepare an annual report for its Board each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, which report evaluates the Fund’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the application and the procedures established to achieve such compliance. Each Fund’s chief compliance officer will also annually file a certification pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form N–SAR, as such Form may be revised, amended, or superseded from time to time, for each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, that certifies that the Fund and Adviser have established procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of the application. In particular, such certification will address procedures designed to achieve the following objectives: (a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate and, if applicable, the yield of the highest yielding Money Market Funds, but lower than the Bank Loan Rate; (b) compliance with the collateral requirements as set forth in the application; (c) compliance with the percentage limitations on interfund borrowing and lending; (d) allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an equitable manner and in accordance with procedures established by the Board of each Fund; and (e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does not exceed the interest rate on any third party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the time of the Interfund Loan. Additionally, each Fund’s independent public accountants, in connection with their Fund audit examinations, will review the operation of the proposed credit facility for compliance with the conditions of this application and their review will form the basis, in part, of the auditor’s report on internal accounting controls in Form N–SAR. 18. No Fund will participate in the proposed credit facility upon receipt of requisite regulatory approval unless it has fully disclosed in its prospectus and/or statement of additional information all material facts about its intended participation. PO 00000 Frm 00166 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 39015 For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–15971 Filed 7–8–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 2 p.m. Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present. The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session. The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400. Dated: July 3, 2014. Lynn M. Powalski, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–16107 Filed 7–7–14; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 131 (Wednesday, July 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39010-39015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 31146; File No. 812-14217]


BMO Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application

July 2, 2014.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to (a) section 
6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') granting an 
exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of 
the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption 
from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) 
section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain 
joint arrangements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the Application:  Applicants request an order that would 
permit certain registered open-end management investment companies to 
participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility.

Applicants:  BMO Fund, Inc. (``Company'' or ``BMO''), BMO Asset 
Management Corp. (``Adviser''), and BMO Harris Bank N.A. (``Bank'').

DATES: Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 25, 2013, 
and amended on February 14, 2014 and June 6, 2014. Applicants have 
agreed to file an amendment during the notice period,

[[Page 39011]]

the substance of which is reflected in this notice.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the application 
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested 
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary 
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by 
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 
p.m. on July 28, 2014, and should be accompanied by proof of service on 
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate 
of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's 
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons 
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by 
writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F 
Street NE., Washington, DC, 20549-1090; Applicants: c/o BMO Funds, 
Inc., 111 East Kilbourn Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emerson S. Davis, Senior Counsel, at 
(202) 551-6868 or Daniele Marchesani, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821 
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained via the 
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an 
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.

Applicants' Representations

    1. The Company is organized as a Wisconsin corporation and is 
registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company. 
The Company consists of multiple series, three of which comply with 
Rule 2a-7 under the Act and hold themselves out as money market funds 
(``Money Market Funds''). BMO Asset Management Corp. is a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of BMO Financial Corp, which is an indirectly wholly-owned 
subsidiary of the Bank of Montreal, a Canadian bank holding company. 
BMO Asset Management Corp. is, and any other Adviser will be registered 
as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
(``Advisers Act'') and serve as the investment adviser to the Funds.\1\ 
The Adviser may engage one or more affiliated or unaffiliated 
subadvisers and each will be registered as an investment adviser under 
the Advisers Act or not be subject to registration. BMO Harris Bank, an 
affiliate of BMO Asset Management Corp. and an indirect wholly-owned 
subsidiary of BMO Financial Corp., serves as custodian for the Company 
and the Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicants request that the relief apply to each existing 
and future series of the Company, any other registered open-end 
investment company or series thereof (``Funds'') for which BMO Asset 
Management Corp., including any successor entity thereto, or a 
person controlling, controlled by, or under common control (within 
the meaning of section 2(a)(9) of the Act) with BMO Asset Management 
Corp. serves as investment adviser (collectively, the ``Adviser''); 
and (c) BMO Asset Management Corp. The term ``successor'' is limited 
to entities that result from a reorganization into another 
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business organization. All 
entities that currently intend to rely on the requested relief are 
named as applicants. Any other entity that relies on the order in 
the future will comply with the terms and conditions set forth in 
the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. At any particular time, while some Funds are entering into 
repurchase agreements, or purchasing other short-term instruments, 
other Funds may need to borrow money from the same or similar banks for 
temporary purposes to satisfy redemption requests, to cover 
unanticipated cash shortfalls such as a trade ``fail'' in which cash 
payment for a security sold by a Fund has been delayed, or for other 
temporary purposes. The Company, on behalf of the Funds, has entered 
into a Loan Agreement, as amended, with State Street Bank & Trust 
Company (the ``Loan Agreement'') under which the Company has access to 
a $50 million standby line of credit on behalf of the Funds.
    3. When a Fund borrows money from a bank or under the Loan 
Agreement, it pays interest on the loan at a rate that is higher than 
the rate that is earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds on investments 
in repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments of the same 
maturity as the bank loan or loan under the Loan Agreement. Applicants 
assert that this differential represents the profit earned by the 
lender on loans and is not attributable to any material difference in 
the credit quality or risk of such transactions.
    4. The Funds seek to enter into master interfund lending agreements 
(``Interfund Lending Agreements'') with each other that would permit 
each Fund to lend money directly to and borrow money directly from 
other Funds through a credit facility for temporary purposes. The Money 
Market Funds will not participate as borrowers in the proposed credit 
facility. Applicants state that the proposed credit facility would both 
reduce the Funds' potential borrowing costs and enhance the ability of 
the lending Funds to earn higher rates of interest on their short-term 
lendings. Although the proposed credit facility would reduce the Funds' 
need to borrow from banks, the Funds would be free to establish and 
maintain committed lines of credit or other borrowing arrangements with 
unaffiliated banks.
    5. Applicants anticipate that the proposed credit facility would 
provide a borrowing Fund with significant savings at times when the 
cash position of the borrowing Fund is insufficient to meet temporary 
cash requirements. This situation could arise when shareholder 
redemptions exceed anticipated volumes and certain Funds have 
insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such redemptions. When the Funds 
liquidate portfolio securities to meet redemption requests, they often 
do not receive payment in settlement for up to three days (or longer 
for certain foreign transactions). However, redemption requests 
normally are effected immediately. The proposed credit facility would 
provide a source of immediate, short-term liquidity pending settlement 
of the sale of portfolio securities.
    6. Applicants also anticipate that a Fund could use the proposed 
credit facility when a sale of securities ``fails'' due to 
circumstances beyond the Fund's control, such as a delay in the 
delivery of cash to the Fund's custodian or improper delivery 
instructions by the broker effecting the transaction. ``Sales fails'' 
may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to purchase a 
security using the proceeds from securities sold. Alternatively, the 
Fund could ``fail'' on its intended purchase due to lack of funds from 
the previous sale, resulting in additional cost to the Fund, or sell a 
security on a same-day settlement basis, earning a lower return on the 
investment. Use of the proposed credit facility under these 
circumstances would enable the Fund to have access to immediate short-
term liquidity.
    7. While bank borrowings could generally supply needed cash to 
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the proposed 
credit facility, a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than 
those that would be payable under short-term loans offered by banks. In 
addition, Funds making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds 
would earn interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain 
from investing their cash in repurchase agreements or purchasing shares 
of a money market fund. Thus, applicants assert that the proposed 
credit facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.

[[Page 39012]]

    8. The interest rate to be charged to the Funds on any Interfund 
Loan (the ``Interfund Loan Rate'') would be the average of the ``Repo 
Rate'' and the ``Bank Loan Rate,'' both as defined below. The Repo Rate 
for any day would be the highest rate available to a lending Fund, 
directly or through a joint account, from investment in overnight 
repurchase agreements. The Bank Loan Rate for any day would be 
calculated by the Credit Facility Team (as defined below) each day an 
Interfund Loan is made according to a formula established by each 
Fund's board of directors (the ``Board'') and intended to approximate 
the lowest interest rate at which bank short-term loans would be 
available to the Funds. The formula would be based upon a publicly 
available rate (e.g., federal funds plus 25 basis points) and would 
vary with this rate so as to reflect changing bank loan rates. The 
initial formula and any subsequent modifications to the formula would 
be subject to the approval of each Fund's Board. In addition, each 
Fund's Board would periodically review the continuing appropriateness 
of using the formula to determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the 
relationship between the Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates 
that would be available to the Funds.
    9. The proposed credit facility would be administered by the Funds' 
president, chief compliance officer and treasurer and chief compliance 
officer and an investment professional within the Adviser who serves as 
a portfolio manager for the Money Market Funds (the ``Money Market 
Manager'') (collectively, the ``Credit Facility Team''). No other 
portfolio manager of any Fund will serve as a member of the Credit 
Facility Team. On any day on which a Fund intends to borrow money, the 
Credit Facility Team would make an Interfund Loan from a lending Fund 
to a borrowing Fund only if the Interfund Loan Rate is (i) more 
favorable to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate and, if applicable, 
the yield of any money market fund in which a lending Fund could 
otherwise invest and (ii) more favorable to the borrowing Fund than the 
Bank Loan Rate. Under the proposed credit facility, the portfolio 
managers for each participating Fund could provide standing 
instructions to participate daily as a borrower or lender. The Money 
Market Funds would not participate as borrowers. The Credit Facility 
Team on each business day would collect data on the uninvested cash and 
borrowing requirements of all participating Funds. The Credit Facility 
Team would allocate loans among borrowing Funds without any further 
communication from the portfolio managers of the Funds (other than the 
Money Market Manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of the 
Credit Facility Team). All allocations made by the Credit Facility Team 
will require the approval of at least one member of the Credit Facility 
Team, who is a high level employee and who is not the Money Market 
Manager. Applicants anticipate that there typically will be far more 
available uninvested cash each day than borrowing demand. Therefore, 
after the Credit Facility Team has allocated cash for Interfund Loans, 
any remaining cash will be invested in accordance with the standing 
instructions of portfolio managers or such remaining amounts will be 
invested directly by the portfolio managers of the Funds and returned 
to the Funds.
    10. The Credit Facility Team would allocate borrowing demand and 
cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Credit Facility 
Team believes to be an equitable basis, subject to certain 
administrative procedures applicable to all Funds, such as the time of 
filing requests to participate, minimum loan lot sizes, and the need to 
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative 
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each InterFund Loan normally would 
be allocated in a manner intended to minimize the number of 
participants necessary to complete the loan transaction. The method of 
allocation and related administrative procedures would be approved by 
each Fund's Board, including a majority of directors who are not 
``interested persons'' of the Fund, as that term is defined in section 
2(a)(19) of the Act (``Independent Directors''), to ensure that both 
borrowing and lending Funds participate on an equitable basis.
    11. The Credit Facility Team would: (a) Monitor the Interfund Loan 
Rate and the other terms and conditions of the loans; (b) limit the 
borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that they 
comply with the Fund's investment policies and limitations; (c) ensure 
equitable treatment of each Fund; and (d) make quarterly reports to 
each Fund's Board concerning any transactions by the Fund under the 
proposed credit facility and the Interfund Loan Rate charged.
    12. The Adviser and BMO Harris Bank, through the Credit Facility 
Team, would administer the proposed credit facility as a disinterested 
fiduciary as part of its duties under the relevant advisory or 
administrative contract with each Fund and would receive no additional 
fee as compensation for its services in connection with the 
administration of the proposed credit facility. They may collect 
standard pricing, record keeping, bookkeeping and accounting fees 
associated with the transfer of cash and/or securities in connection 
with repurchase and lending transactions generally, including 
transactions effected through the proposed credit facility. Such fees 
would be no higher than those applicable for comparable bank loan 
transactions.
    13. No Fund may participate in the proposed credit facility unless: 
(a) The Fund has obtained shareholder approval for its participation, 
if such approval is required by law; (b) the Fund has fully disclosed 
all material information concerning the credit facility in its 
prospectus and/or statement of additional information; and (c) the 
Fund's participation in the credit facility is consistent with its 
investment objectives, limitations and organizational documents.
    14. In connection with the credit facility, applicants request an 
order under section 6(c) of the Act exempting them from the provisions 
of sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; under section 12(d)(1)(J) of 
the Act exempting them from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; under sections 
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act exempting them from sections 17(a)(1), 
17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and under section 17(d) of the Act 
and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated 
person of a registered investment company, or affiliated person of an 
affiliated person, from borrowing money or other property from the 
registered investment company. Section 21(b) of the Act generally 
prohibits any registered management company from lending money or other 
property to any person, directly or indirectly, if that person controls 
or is under common control with that company. Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the 
Act defines an ``affiliated person'' of another person, in part, to be 
any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under 
common control with, such other person. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act 
defines ``control'' as the ``power to exercise a controlling influence 
over the management or policies of a company,'' but excludes 
circumstances in which ``such power is solely the result of an official 
position with such company.'' Applicants state that the Funds may be 
under common control by virtue of having the Adviser as their common 
investment adviser

[[Page 39013]]

and/or by having common officers, directors and/or trustees.
    2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that an exemptive order may be 
granted where an exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public 
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed 
transaction from section 17(a) provided that the terms of the 
transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are 
fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any 
person concerned, and the transaction is consistent with the policy of 
the investment company as recited in its registration statement and 
reports filed under the Act, and with the general purposes of the Act. 
Applicants believe that the proposed arrangements satisfy these 
standards for the reasons discussed below.
    3. Applicants assert that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) of the Act 
were intended to prevent a party with strong potential adverse 
interests to, and some influence over the investment decisions of, a 
registered investment company from causing or inducing the investment 
company to engage in lending transactions that unfairly inure to the 
benefit of such party and that are detrimental to the best interests of 
the investment company and its shareholders. Applicants assert that the 
proposed credit facility transactions do not raise these concerns 
because: (a) The Adviser and BMO Harris Bank, through the Credit 
Facility Team, would administer the program as a disinterested 
fiduciary as part of its duties under the relevant advisory contract 
with each Fund and a disinterested party, respectively, as part of its 
duties under the relevant advisory or administrative contract with each 
Fund; (b) all Interfund Loans would consist only of uninvested cash 
reserves that the lending Fund otherwise would invest in short-term 
repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments either directly 
or through a money market fund; (c) the Interfund Loans would not 
involve a significantly greater risk than other such investments; (d) 
the lending Fund would receive interest at a rate higher than it could 
otherwise obtain through such other investments; and (e) the borrowing 
Fund would pay interest at a rate lower than otherwise available to it 
under its bank loan agreements and avoid the up-front commitment fees 
associated with committed lines of credit. Moreover, applicants assert 
that the other terms and conditions that applicants propose also would 
effectively preclude the possibility of any Fund obtaining an undue 
advantage over any other Fund.
    4. Section 17(a)(1) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated 
person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated person of 
such a person, from selling securities or other property to the 
investment company. Section 17(a)(2) of the Act generally prohibits an 
affiliated person of a registered investment company, or any affiliated 
person of such a person, from purchasing securities or other property 
from the investment company. Section 12(d)(1) of the Act generally 
prohibits a registered investment company from purchasing or otherwise 
acquiring any security issued by any other investment company except in 
accordance with the limitations set forth in that section.
    5. Applicants state that the obligation of a borrowing Fund to 
repay an Interfund Loan could be deemed to constitute a security for 
the purposes of sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of the Act. Applicants 
also state that a pledge of assets in connection with an Interfund Loan 
could be construed as a purchase of the borrowing Fund's securities or 
other property for purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act. Section 
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt persons 
or transactions from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the 
extent that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and 
the protection of investors. Applicants contend that the standards 
under sections 6(c), 17(b), and 12(d)(1)(J) are satisfied for all the 
reasons set forth above in support of their request for relief from 
sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) and for the reasons discussed below. 
Applicants also state that the requested relief from section 17(a)(2) 
of the Act meets the standards of section 6(c) and 17(b) because any 
collateral pledged to secure an Interfund Loan would be subject to the 
same conditions imposed by any other lender to a Fund that imposes 
conditions on the quality of or access to collateral for a borrowing 
(if the lender is another Fund) or the same or better conditions (in 
any other circumstance).
    6. Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was intended to prevent 
the pyramiding of investment companies in order to avoid imposing on 
investors additional and duplicative costs and fees attendant upon 
multiple layers of investments. Applicants submit that the proposed 
credit facility does not involve these abuses. Applicants note that 
there will be no duplicative costs or fees to the Funds or their 
shareholders, and that the Adviser and BMO Harris Bank will receive no 
additional compensation for its services in administering the credit 
facility. Applicants also note that the purpose of the proposed credit 
facility is to provide economic benefits for all the participating 
Funds and their shareholders.
    7. Section 18(f)(1) of the Act prohibits open-end investment 
companies from issuing any senior security except that a company is 
permitted to borrow from any bank, provided, that immediately after the 
borrowing, there is asset coverage of at least 300 per centum for all 
borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g) of the Act, the term 
``senior security'' generally includes any bond, debenture, note or 
similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and evidencing 
indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief under section 6(c) 
from section 18(f)(1) to the limited extent necessary to permit a Fund 
to lend to or borrow directly from other Funds.
    8. Applicants believe that granting relief under section 6(c) is 
appropriate because the Funds would remain subject to the requirement 
of section 18(f)(1) that all borrowings of a Fund, including combined 
interfund and bank borrowings, have at least 300% asset coverage. Based 
on the conditions and safeguards described in the application, 
applicants also submit that to allow the Funds to borrow from other 
Funds pursuant to the proposed credit facility is consistent with the 
purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1).
    9. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act generally 
prohibit an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or 
any affiliated person of such a person, when acting as principal, from 
effecting any joint transaction in which the investment company 
participates, unless, upon application, the transaction has been 
approved by the Commission. Rule 17d-1(b) under the Act provides that 
in passing upon an application filed under the rule, the Commission 
will consider whether the participation of the registered investment 
company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement, or profit-sharing 
plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies 
and purposes of the Act and the extent to which such participation is 
on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of the other 
participants.
    10. Applicants assert that the purpose of section 17(d) is to avoid 
overreaching by and unfair advantage to insiders. Applicants assert 
that the proposed credit facility is consistent with the provisions, 
policies and purposes of the Act in that it offers both reduced

[[Page 39014]]

borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all 
participating Funds and their shareholders. Applicants note that each 
Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms 
consistent with its investment policies and fundamental investment 
limitations. Applicants assert that each Fund's participation in the 
proposed credit facility would be on terms that are no different from 
or less advantageous than that of other participating Funds.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will 
be subject to the following conditions:
    1. The Interfund Loan Rate will be the average of the Repo Rate and 
the Bank Loan Rate.
    2. On each business day, the Credit Facility Team will compare the 
Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and will make cash available for 
Interfund Loans only if the Interfund Loan Rate is: (a) More favorable 
to the lending Fund than the Repo Rate; and, if applicable, the yield 
of the highest yielding money market fund in which the lending Fund 
could otherwise invest and (b) more favorable to the borrowing Fund 
than the Bank Loan Rate.
    3. If a Fund has outstanding bank borrowings, any Interfund Loans 
to the Fund: (a) will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than the 
interest rate of any outstanding bank loan; (b) will be secured at 
least on an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage 
of collateral to loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires 
collateral; (c) will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding 
bank loan (and in any event not over seven days); and (d) will provide 
that, if an event of default by the Fund occurs under any agreement 
evidencing an outstanding bank loan to the Fund, that event of default 
will automatically (without need for action or notice by the lending 
Fund) constitute an immediate event of default under the Interfund 
Lending Agreement entitling the lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan 
(and exercise all rights with respect to any collateral) and that such 
call will be made if the lending bank exercises its right to call its 
loan under its agreement with the borrowing Fund.
    4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the proposed 
credit facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources 
immediately after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its 
total assets, provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding 
from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the 
Fund's interfund borrowing will be secured on at least an equal 
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to 
loan value as any outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a 
Fund's total outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund 
borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may 
borrow through the proposed credit facility only on a secured basis. A 
Fund may not borrow through the proposed credit facility or from any 
other source if its total outstanding borrowings immediately after the 
interfund borrowing would be more than 33 1/3% of its total assets.
    5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may, 
through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from 
all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first 
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated 
collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the 
outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding 
borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceed 10% of its 
total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset value 
or because of shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one 
business day thereafter: (a) Repay all of its outstanding Interfund 
Loans; (b) reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its 
total assets; or (c) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the 
pledge of segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to 
102% of the outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund's 
total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets, 
at which time the collateral called for by this condition (5) shall no 
longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding at 
any time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings exceed 10% is 
repaid or the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% 
of its total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to 
market each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is 
necessary to maintain the market value of the collateral that secures 
each outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the 
outstanding principal value of the Interfund Loan.
    6. No Fund may lend to another Fund through the proposed credit 
facility if the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans 
through the proposed credit facility to exceed 15% of the lending 
Fund's current net assets at the time of the loan.
    7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of 
the lending Fund's net assets.
    8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time 
required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more 
than seven days. Loans effected within seven days of each other will be 
treated as separate loan transactions for purposes of this condition.
    9. A Fund's borrowings through the proposed credit facility, as 
measured on the day when the most recent loan was made, will not exceed 
the greater of 125% of the Fund's total net cash redemptions for the 
preceding seven calendar days or 102% of the Fund's sales fails for the 
preceding seven calendar days.
    10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice 
by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund.
    11. A Fund's participation in the proposed credit facility must be 
consistent with its investment objectives and limitations and 
organizational documents.
    12. The Credit Facility Team will calculate total Fund borrowing 
and lending demand through the proposed credit facility, and allocate 
loans on an equitable basis among the Funds, without the intervention 
of any portfolio manager of the Funds (other than the Money Market 
Manager acting in his or her capacity as a member of the Credit 
Facility Team). All allocations will require the approval of at least 
one member of the Credit Facility Team, who is a high level employee 
and who is not the Money Market Manager. The Credit Facility Team will 
not solicit cash for the proposed credit facility from any Fund or 
prospectively publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio 
managers (except to the extent that the Money Market Manager has access 
to loan demand data). The Credit Facility Team will invest any amounts 
remaining after satisfaction of borrowing demand in accordance with the 
instructions of each of the relevant portfolio manager or such 
remaining amounts will be invested directly by the portfolio managers 
of the Funds or the Credit Facility Team will return remaining amounts 
to the Funds.
    13. The Credit Facility Team will monitor the interest rates 
charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and 
will make a quarterly report to the Board of each Fund concerning the 
participation of the Funds in the proposed credit facility and the 
terms and other conditions of any extensions of credit under the credit 
facility.
    14. The Board of each Fund, including a majority of the Independent 
Directors, will:

[[Page 39015]]

    (a) Review, no less frequently than quarterly, each Fund's 
participation in the proposed credit facility during the preceding 
quarter for compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such 
transactions;
    (b) establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to determine the 
interest rate on Interfund Loans and review, no less frequently than 
annually, the continuing appropriateness of the Bank Loan Rate formula; 
and
    (c) review, no less frequently than annually, the continuing 
appropriateness of the Fund's participation in the proposed credit 
facility.
    15. In the event an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its 
terms and the default is not cured within two business days from its 
maturity or from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment 
under the provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Credit 
Facility Team will promptly refer the loan for arbitration to an 
independent arbitrator selected by the Board of each Fund involved in 
the loan who will serve as arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund 
Loans.\2\ The arbitrator will resolve any problem promptly, and the 
arbitrator's decision will be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator 
will submit, at least annually, a written report to the Board of each 
Fund setting forth a description of the nature of any dispute and the 
actions taken by the Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ If the dispute involves Funds with different Boards of 
Directors, the respective Board of each Fund will select an 
independent arbitrator that is satisfactory to each Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less 
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any transaction 
by it under the proposed credit facility occurred, the first two years 
in an easily accessible place, written records of all such transactions 
setting forth a description of the terms of the transactions, including 
the amount, the maturity and the Interfund Loan Rate, the rate of 
interest available at the time each Interfund Loan is made on overnight 
repurchase agreements and bank borrowings, the yield of any money 
market fund in which the lending Fund could otherwise invest, and such 
other information presented to the Fund's Board in connection with the 
review required by conditions 13 and 14.
    17. The Credit Facility Team will prepare and submit to the Board 
of each Fund for review an initial report describing the operations of 
the proposed credit facility and the procedures to be implemented to 
ensure that all Funds are treated fairly. After the commencement of the 
proposed credit facility, the Credit Facility Team will report on the 
operations of the proposed credit facility at each Board's quarterly 
meetings.
    Each Fund's chief compliance officer, as defined in Rule 38a-
1(a)(4) under the Act, shall prepare an annual report for its Board 
each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, 
which report evaluates the Fund's compliance with the terms and 
conditions of the application and the procedures established to achieve 
such compliance. Each Fund's chief compliance officer will also 
annually file a certification pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form N-SAR, as 
such Form may be revised, amended, or superseded from time to time, for 
each year that the Fund participates in the proposed credit facility, 
that certifies that the Fund and Adviser have established procedures 
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions 
of the application. In particular, such certification will address 
procedures designed to achieve the following objectives:
    (a) That the Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than the Repo Rate 
and, if applicable, the yield of the highest yielding Money Market 
Funds, but lower than the Bank Loan Rate;
    (b) compliance with the collateral requirements as set forth in the 
application;
    (c) compliance with the percentage limitations on interfund 
borrowing and lending;
    (d) allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an 
equitable manner and in accordance with procedures established by the 
Board of each Fund; and
    (e) that the Interfund Loan Rate does not exceed the interest rate 
on any third party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the time of the 
Interfund Loan.
    Additionally, each Fund's independent public accountants, in 
connection with their Fund audit examinations, will review the 
operation of the proposed credit facility for compliance with the 
conditions of this application and their review will form the basis, in 
part, of the auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form 
N-SAR.
    18. No Fund will participate in the proposed credit facility upon 
receipt of requisite regulatory approval unless it has fully disclosed 
in its prospectus and/or statement of additional information all 
material facts about its intended participation.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
under delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-15971 Filed 7-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.