Proposed Collection, Comment Request, 38071-38072 [2014-15649]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 128 / Thursday, July 3, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—The Open Group, L.L.C.
Notice is hereby given that, on June
16, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The Open Group,
L.L.C. (‘‘TOG’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, ALC Group, Kenmore,
AUSTRALIA; APISA Alternativas en
Productividad Integral, S.A. de C.V.,
Mexico City, MEXICO; archiSpark sp.
z.o.o., Katowice, POLAND; ARTe Group
B.V., Maastricht, THE NETHERLANDS;
Avionics Interface Technologies, L.L.C.,
Omaha, NE; AVISTA, Incorporated,
Platteville, WI; BCS-Dr. Juergen
Pitschke, Dresden, GERMANY; Blue
Hawk B&IT Management, Sao Paulo,
BRAZIL; Connected Digital Economy
Catapult, London, UNITED KINGDOM;
EDF Group, Paris, FRANCE; IBISKA
Telecom, Inc., Ottawa, CANADA;
InProgress sp. z.o.o., Krakow, POLAND;
Integrate IT, LLC., Hood River, OR;
Interos Solutions, Inc., McLean, VA;
JSM Consulting Oy, Lempaala,
FINLAND; Pyrrhus Software, L.L.C.,
Phoenix, AZ; SELEX Galileo, Inc.,
´
Arlington, VA; Universidad Politecnica
de Victoria, Victoria, MEXICO; and
Versatil-I–T Services-Conseils, Inc.,
Longueuil, CANADA, have been added
as parties to this venture.
Also, AITECH Defense Systems, Inc.,
Chatsworth, CA; Cardiff University
School of Computer Science, Cardiff,
UNITED KINGDOM; Casewise Systems
Ltd., Stamford, CT; Chem National
Chemical Corporation, Beijing,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Colorado Technical University, Sioux
Falls, SD; Commerzbank AG, London,
UNITED KINGDOM; Computaris
International Limited, Warsaw,
POLAND; Dovel Technologies, Inc.,
McLean, VA; Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, GA; Marathon Oil
Corporation, Houston, TX; Mizuho
Information and Research Institute, Inc.,
Chiba, JAPAN; Qualys Inc., Redwood
City, CA; Smart421 Ltd., Ipswich,
UNITED KINGDOM; tang-IT Consulting
GmbH, Wiesbaden, GERMANY;
Transformation By Design Business
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jul 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Consulting Inc., Toronto, CANADA; and
Treasury Board of Canada (EASD–
CIOB), Ottawa, CANADA, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and TOG intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 21, 1997, TOG filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 13, 1997 (62 FR 32371).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on March 21, 2014. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on May 30, 2014 (79 FR 31138).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–15614 Filed 7–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed revision of the
‘‘The Consumer Expenditure Surveys:
The Quarterly Interview and the Diary.’’
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the individual listed
below in the Addresses section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38071
Addresses section of this notice on or
before September 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nora
Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE.,
Washington, DC 20212. Written
comments also may be transmitted by
fax to 202–691–5111 (this is not a toll
free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer, at
202–691–7628 (this is not a toll free
number). (See Addresses section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Expenditure (CE)
Surveys collect data on consumer
expenditures, demographic information,
and related data needed by the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and other
public and private data users. The
continuing surveys provide a constant
measurement of changes in consumer
expenditure patterns for economic
analysis and to obtain data for future
CPI revisions. The CE Surveys have
been ongoing since 1979.
The data from the CE Surveys are
used (1) for CPI revisions, (2) to provide
a continuous flow of data on income
and expenditure patterns for use in
economic analysis and policy
formulation, and (3) to provide a
flexible consumer survey vehicle that is
available for use by other Federal
Government agencies. Public and
private users of price statistics,
including Congress and the economic
policymaking agencies of the Executive
branch, rely on data collected in the CPI
in their day-to-day activities. Hence,
data users and policymakers widely
accept the need to improve the process
used for revising the CPI. If the CE
Surveys were not conducted on a
continuing basis, current information
necessary for more timely, as well as
more accurate, updating of the CPI
would not be available. In addition, data
would not be available to respond to the
continuing demand from the public and
private sectors for current information
on consumer spending.
In the Quarterly Interview Survey,
each consumer unit (CU) in the sample
is interviewed every three months over
four calendar quarters. The sample for
each quarter is divided into three
panels, with CUs being interviewed
every three months in the same panel of
every quarter. The Quarterly Interview
Survey is designed to collect data on the
types of expenditures that respondents
can be expected to recall for a period of
three months or longer. In general the
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
38072
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 128 / Thursday, July 3, 2014 / Notices
expenses reported in the Interview
Survey are either relatively large, such
as property, automobiles, or major
appliances, or are expenses which occur
on a fairly regular basis, such as rent,
utility bills, or insurance premiums.
The Diary (or recordkeeping) Survey
is completed at home by the respondent
family for two consecutive one-week
periods. The primary objective of the
Diary Survey is to obtain expenditure
data on small, frequently purchased
items which normally are difficult to
recall over longer periods of time.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget
clearance is being sought for the
proposed revision of the Consumer
Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly
Interview and the Diary.
Every ten years the CE survey updates
its sample of primary sampling units
(PSUs) based on the latest decennial
census in order to make sure its sample
accurately reflects the latest geographic
shifts in the American population. The
2015 sample design implements new
geography for CE. This involves
dropping PSUs, adding PSUs, and
dropping and adding counties within
existing PSUs.
Beginning in 2015, the first wave
bounding interview of the Consumer
Expenditure Quarterly Interview Survey
will be phased out and a four wave
survey will be implemented. All four
waves will have a three month reference
period and data from all waves will be
used in the final, published data. The
decision to eliminate the bounding
interview was based on substantial
research on the ineffectiveness of the
bounding interview, and its negative
impact on respondent burden and
survey costs.
Additionally, to keep the survey
current and to fulfill the requirements of
the Consumer Price Index (CPI),
question wording of some items was
simplified, some items were deleted,
and other items were added. In the
Interview instrument, those change are
as follows: (1) New screeners including
a business expense screener that will
screen out households who do not have
any business expenses from the
business expense questions and a
detailed phone bill screener that will
screen out breakout questions for TV,
Internet, etc., when a bill is not
available; (2) questions added on Tricare
and on health care exchanges; (3)
questions and screeners deleted
including the alcohol screener question,
a question on if anything else is
included in a package trip, a question
on the number of trips purchased for
non CU members, and questions on
federal and state/local income taxes and
refunds; and (4) simplified question
wording.
In the 2015 Diary CAPI instrument,
questions on regular grocery expenses
and expenses for food from places other
than a grocery store were reworded to
match Interview.
A full list of the proposed changes to
the Quarterly Interview Survey and
Diary Survey are available upon request.
In addition, the Consumer
Expenditure program is planning
several tests over the next several years
in an effort to improve the CE surveys
in the areas of both data quality and
respondent burden.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Type of Review: Revision, of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: The Consumer Expenditure
Surveys: The Quarterly Interview and
the Diary.
OMB Number: 1220–0050.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
TOTAL RESPONSE BURDEN FOR THE QUARTERLY INTERVIEW AND DIARY SURVEYS
CEQ-interview
2015
CEQ-interview
(after 2015)
32,895
27,708
32,447
27,332
Number of responses ..........................................................
Total burden hours ...............................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they also
will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June 2014.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2014–15649 Filed 7–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jul 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs
Division of Federal Employees’
Compensation; Proposed Renewal of
the Existing Collection; Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CED-diary
36,895
33,599
Total
(2015)
69,790
61,307
Total
(after 2015)
69,342
60,931
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the Office
of Workers’ Compensation Programs is
soliciting comments concerning the
proposed collection: Claim for
Compensation (CA–7); Authorization for
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38071-38072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15649]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c) (2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the
proposed revision of the ``The Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The
Quarterly Interview and the Diary.'' A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the individual
listed below in the Addresses section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or before September 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20212. Written comments also
may be transmitted by fax to 202-691-5111 (this is not a toll free
number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
at 202-691-7628 (this is not a toll free number). (See Addresses
section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Expenditure (CE) Surveys collect data on consumer
expenditures, demographic information, and related data needed by the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and other public and private data users. The
continuing surveys provide a constant measurement of changes in
consumer expenditure patterns for economic analysis and to obtain data
for future CPI revisions. The CE Surveys have been ongoing since 1979.
The data from the CE Surveys are used (1) for CPI revisions, (2) to
provide a continuous flow of data on income and expenditure patterns
for use in economic analysis and policy formulation, and (3) to provide
a flexible consumer survey vehicle that is available for use by other
Federal Government agencies. Public and private users of price
statistics, including Congress and the economic policymaking agencies
of the Executive branch, rely on data collected in the CPI in their
day-to-day activities. Hence, data users and policymakers widely accept
the need to improve the process used for revising the CPI. If the CE
Surveys were not conducted on a continuing basis, current information
necessary for more timely, as well as more accurate, updating of the
CPI would not be available. In addition, data would not be available to
respond to the continuing demand from the public and private sectors
for current information on consumer spending.
In the Quarterly Interview Survey, each consumer unit (CU) in the
sample is interviewed every three months over four calendar quarters.
The sample for each quarter is divided into three panels, with CUs
being interviewed every three months in the same panel of every
quarter. The Quarterly Interview Survey is designed to collect data on
the types of expenditures that respondents can be expected to recall
for a period of three months or longer. In general the
[[Page 38072]]
expenses reported in the Interview Survey are either relatively large,
such as property, automobiles, or major appliances, or are expenses
which occur on a fairly regular basis, such as rent, utility bills, or
insurance premiums.
The Diary (or recordkeeping) Survey is completed at home by the
respondent family for two consecutive one-week periods. The primary
objective of the Diary Survey is to obtain expenditure data on small,
frequently purchased items which normally are difficult to recall over
longer periods of time.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget clearance is being sought for the
proposed revision of the Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly
Interview and the Diary.
Every ten years the CE survey updates its sample of primary
sampling units (PSUs) based on the latest decennial census in order to
make sure its sample accurately reflects the latest geographic shifts
in the American population. The 2015 sample design implements new
geography for CE. This involves dropping PSUs, adding PSUs, and
dropping and adding counties within existing PSUs.
Beginning in 2015, the first wave bounding interview of the
Consumer Expenditure Quarterly Interview Survey will be phased out and
a four wave survey will be implemented. All four waves will have a
three month reference period and data from all waves will be used in
the final, published data. The decision to eliminate the bounding
interview was based on substantial research on the ineffectiveness of
the bounding interview, and its negative impact on respondent burden
and survey costs.
Additionally, to keep the survey current and to fulfill the
requirements of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), question wording of
some items was simplified, some items were deleted, and other items
were added. In the Interview instrument, those change are as follows:
(1) New screeners including a business expense screener that will
screen out households who do not have any business expenses from the
business expense questions and a detailed phone bill screener that will
screen out breakout questions for TV, Internet, etc., when a bill is
not available; (2) questions added on Tricare and on health care
exchanges; (3) questions and screeners deleted including the alcohol
screener question, a question on if anything else is included in a
package trip, a question on the number of trips purchased for non CU
members, and questions on federal and state/local income taxes and
refunds; and (4) simplified question wording.
In the 2015 Diary CAPI instrument, questions on regular grocery
expenses and expenses for food from places other than a grocery store
were reworded to match Interview.
A full list of the proposed changes to the Quarterly Interview
Survey and Diary Survey are available upon request.
In addition, the Consumer Expenditure program is planning several
tests over the next several years in an effort to improve the CE
surveys in the areas of both data quality and respondent burden.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used.
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
Type of Review: Revision, of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: The Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly Interview
and the Diary.
OMB Number: 1220-0050.
Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
Total Response Burden for the Quarterly Interview and Diary Surveys
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEQ-interview CEQ-interview Total (after
2015 (after 2015) CED-diary Total (2015) 2015)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of responses............. 32,895 32,447 36,895 69,790 69,342
Total burden hours.............. 27,708 27,332 33,599 61,307 60,931
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they also will become a
matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 2014.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2014-15649 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P