Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Strike Settings for Mini-S&P 500 Index Options, 37825-37828 [2014-15475]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Notices
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[FR Doc. 2014–15477 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2014–027 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2014–027. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2014–027 and should be submitted on
or before July 23, 2014.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[Release No. 34–72482; File No. SR–CBOE–
2014–051]
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Strike
Settings for Mini-S&P 500 Index
Options
June 26, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 25,
2014, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Interpretation and Policy .11 to Rule
24.9 (Terms of Index Options Contracts)
by modifying the strike setting regime
for Mini-S&P 500 Index (‘‘XSP’’)
options.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Jul 01, 2014
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
37825
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to amend
Interpretation and Policy .11 to Rule
24.9 (‘‘Interpretation and Policy .11’’) by
modifying the strike setting regime for
Mini-S&P 500 Index (‘‘XSP’’) options.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to more closely align: (1) The permitted
strike prices in XSP options with scaled
corresponding strikes in full value S&P
500 Index (‘‘SPX’’) options; and (2) the
exercise price range limitations for XSP
options with the exercise price range
limitations for equity and exchange
traded fund (‘‘ETF’’) options. Through
this filing, the Exchange hopes to make
XSP options easier for investors to use
and more tailored to their investment
needs.
Over two decades ago, CBOE
introduced XSP options in order to
allow smaller-scale investors to gain
broad exposure to the SPX options
market and hedge S&P 500 Index cash
positions.3 XSP options are reduced
value options that are equal to 1/10th of
the value of the S&P 500 Index and have
a multiplier of $100. For example, if the
S&P 500 Index is at 1932.56, the XSP
Index would have a value of 193.26 and
the notional value of an XSP option
would be $19,326. As the Commission
noted in the XSP option Approval
Order,
reduced-value SPX options may benefit
investors by providing them with a relatively
low-cost means to hedge their portfolios. The
Commission also believes that the lower cost
of the reduced-value SPX options should
allow investors to hedge their portfolios with
a smaller outlay of capital and may facilitate
participation in the market for SPX options,
which should, in turn, help to maintain the
depth and liquidity of the market for SPX
options, thereby protecting investors and the
public interest.4
As the Commission anticipated, XSP
options provide retail investors with the
benefit of trading the broad market in a
manageably sized contract.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32893
(September 14, 1993), 58 FR 49070 (September 21,
1993) (Order approving listing of reduced-value
options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index)
(SR–CBOE–93–12).
4 58 FR at 49071.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
37826
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Notices
Under current Interpretation and
Policy .11 ‘‘the interval between strike
prices of series of Mini-SPX options will
be $1 or greater where the strike price
is $200 or less and $5.00 or greater
where the strike price is greater than
$200.’’ 5 Currently, the XSP Index is
hovering close to 200, reflecting levels
near 2000 in the S&P 500 Index. As a
result, the Exchange has received
customer requests to add strike prices in
XSP options that exceed $200.
Specifically, customers have requested
strike prices in the XSP options scaled
to match strike prices in the SPX
options. Under existing Interpretation
and Policy .11, the Exchange is unable
to list some of the requested strikes. For
example, currently, SPX options have
strike prices that include 2010, 2020
and 2030. In order to list corresponding
scaled strikes in XSP options, CBOE
would need the ability to list the
following strikes: 201, 202 and 203. The
listing of strikes in those increments,
however, is not permitted under current
Interpretation and Policy .11. Rather,
the Exchange currently only has the
ability to list a 200 strike price and a
205 strike price in XSP options.
In addition, exercise prices for XSP
options must be within 30% of the
current XSP value.6 Exercise prices
more than 30% away from the current
XSP level are permitted provided there
is demonstrated customer interest for
such exercise prices. Through this
filing, the Exchange is proposing to
align the exercise price range limitations
for XSP options with the exercise price
range limitations for equity and ETF
options.7 The following example
illustrates the different exercise price
range limitations between XSP options
and equity and ETF options. If the
underlying price of an equity or ETF
option is $200, the Exchange would be
permitted to list strikes ranging from
$100 through $300. If the underlying
level of the XSP is 200, the Exchange
would only be permitted to list strikes
ranging from $140 to $260. To put XSP
options on equal standing with equity
and ETF options in terms of exercise
price range limitations, the Exchange
proposes to replace the 30% ± current
index level strike setting band for XSP
options with the strike setting band that
5 Rule
24.9.11.
24.9.04 generally provides that exercise
prices for index options must be within 30% of the
current index value. Exercise prices more than 30%
away from the current index level are permitted
provided there is demonstrated customer interest
for such exercise prices.
7 Rule 5.5A (Select Provisions of Options Listing
Procedures Plan) sets forth the exercise price range
limitations for equity and ETF options, which are
identical to those being proposed for XSP options
in the current filing.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Jul 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
currently exists for equity and ETF
options. The Exchange believes that the
existing strike setting regime for XSP
options is unnecessarily restrictive and
thus, proposes to establish a new strike
setting regime for XSP options.
In order to more closely align strike
prices between reduced value XSP
options and full value SPX options and
to align the exercise price range
limitations for XSP options with the
existing price range limitations for
equity and ETF options, CBOE proposes
to amend Interpretation and Policy .11
as follows:
• If the current value of the Mini-SPX
is less than or equal to 20, the Exchange
shall not list series with an exercise
price of more than 100% above or below
the current value of the Mini-SPX; 8
• If the current value of the Mini-SPX
is greater than 20, the Exchange shall
not list series with an exercise price of
more than 50% above or below the
current value of the Mini-SPX; and
• The lowest strike price interval that
may be listed for Mini-SPX options is
$1, including for LEAPS.
The Exchange believes that the above
strike price setting regime would permit
strikes to be set to more closely reflect
the current values in the underlying
S&P 500 Index would provide flexibility
and allow the Exchange to better
respond to customer demand for XSP
options strike prices that better relate to
current S&P 500 Index values. In
addition, the Exchange believes that
because the number of strikes that may
be listed would be contained by the
percentages above and below the
current XSP Index value, there is no
need to artificially restrict the use of $1
strike price intervals based on the
exercise price. Rather, the Exchange
may determine to list strikes in $1
intervals or higher based on the level of
the XSP Index, customer demand and
the need to list scaled strikes in reduced
value XSP options that correspond to
strikes in full value SPX options. Also,
the Exchange believes that there is no
reason to have a more limited range of
strikes for XSP options than is currently
permitted for equity or ETF options.
The Exchange recognizes that the
proposed approach does not achieve full
harmonization between strikes in XSP
options and SPX options. For example,
if there is a 2015 strike in SPX options,
CBOE is not seeking the ability to list a
8 The Exchange is proposing to exclude XSP
options from the provisions of Rules 24.9.01(a),
24.01(d) and 24.9.04. Rule 24.9.01(a) identifies
those indexes for which the minimum strike price
interval is $2.50. Rules 24.9.01(d) and 24.9.04 set
forth 30% ranges for setting strike prices based on
the current index level, which are in conflict with
the percentages proposed in this filing.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
201.50 strike in XSP options. CBOE
believes that having the ability to list
the 201 and 202 strikes in XSP options
would provide the marketplace with a
sufficient number of strike prices over a
range of XSP Index values.9 The
Exchange believes that these changes
would allow retail investors to better
use XSP options to gain exposure to the
SPX options market and hedge S&P 500
cash positions in the event that the S&P
500 Index surpasses 2000.
The S&P 500 Index is widely regarded
as the best single gauge of large cap U.S.
equities. As a result, individual
investors often use S&P 500 Indexrelated products to diversify their
portfolios and benefit from market
trends. Full size SPX options offer these
benefits to investors, but may be
expensive with a notional value that
exceeds $190,000 per contract and are
primarily used by institutional market
participants. By contrast, reduced value
XSP options offer individual investors
the ability to benefit from S&P 500
Index options at much lower cost.
The Exchange has analyzed its
capacity and represents that it believes
the Exchange and the Options Price
Reporting Authority have the necessary
systems capacity to handle the
additional traffic associated with
proposed revised strike setting regime
for XSP options. Because the rule
change proposes to continue to only list
strikes within a certain band relative to
current S&P 500 Index levels, the
number of listed strikes would remain
contained. In addition, the proposal is
limited to a single option class (XSP).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.10 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 11 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
9 In the future, the Exchange may request via a
rule filing to have even finer strike price increments
for XSP options and nothing herein is meant to
imply or preclude the Exchange from doing so in
the future if the need arises.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 12 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the proposed rule
change would add consistency to the
S&P 500 Index options markets and
allow investors to more easily use XSP
options. Moreover, the proposed rule
change would allow small investors to
better hedge positions in the S&P 500
Index cash market with XSP options
and ensure that XSP options investors
are not at a disadvantage with respect to
larger institutional investors in the SPX
options.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,13 which
provides that the Exchange be organized
and have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Act and to
enforce compliance by the Exchange’s
Trading Permit Holders and persons
associated with its Trading Permit
Holders with the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule would
create additional capacity issues or
affect market functionality. The rule
change proposes to allow the Exchange
to respond to customer demand by
listing strike prices in the XSP options
scaled to match strike prices in the SPX
options. The number of XSP strikes that
may be listed, however, would not be
unbounded. This would be
accomplished by limiting the interval
between strike prices of series of XSP
options to $1 or greater when the strike
price is greater than 20 and by
prohibiting the Exchange from listing
series with an exercise price of more
than 50% above or below the current
value of the XSP (which is identical to
what is currently permitted for equity
and ETF options).
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would relieve any burden
on, or otherwise promote, competition
in the S&P 500 Index-related markets.
The Exchange believes that the
12 Id.
13 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Jul 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
proposed rule change would bolster
intramarket competition by affording
individual investors in XSP options
investment opportunities that are
similar to those that are available to
investors in SPX options. In addition,
the proposed rule change would allow
investors in XSP options to better hedge
positions in the S&P 500 Index cash
market in a manner similar to larger
investors in the SPX options market.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change would make XSP
options easier for investors to use
because the options would more
accurately reflect positions in the
underlying cash market. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would contribute to
intramarket competition and a more
robust marketplace. Notably, all market
participants would have the same access
to XSP options and would be able to use
XSP options products to appropriately
suit their investment needs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 14 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.15
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange stated that waiver
of this requirement will allow the
Exchange to respond to current
customer demand for strike prices in
XSP options that are scaled to match
existing strikes prices in SPX options.
For this reason, the Commission
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
PO 00000
14 15
15 17
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37827
believes that the proposed rule change
presents no novel issues and that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission designates
the proposed rule change to be operative
upon filing.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2014–051 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2014–051. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
37828
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Notices
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2014–051 and should be submitted on
or before July 23, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–15475 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
The proceeds will be used to finance the
acquisition of Media Source, Inc.
The financing is brought within the
scope of § 107.730(a)(4) of the
Regulations because Brookside
Mezzanine Fund II, L.P., an Associate of
Brookside Mezzanine Fund III, L.P., will
receive part of the proceeds from the
Media Source, Inc. financing in
satisfaction of the Media Source, Inc.
obligation to Brookside Mezzanine Fund
II, L.P. and therefore this transaction is
considered a financing to an Associate
requiring SBA prior written exemption.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction, within
fifteen days of the date of this
publication, to the Associate
Administrator for Investment, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Javier E. Saade,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment
and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2014–15495 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 01/01–0424]
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Brookside Mezzanine Fund III, L.P.;
Notice Seeking Exemption Under
Section 312 of the Small Business
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Request and
Comment Request
Notice is hereby given that Brookside
Mezzanine Fund III, L.P., 201 Tresser
Boulevard, Suite 330, Stamford, CT
06901, a Federal Licensee under the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958,
as amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection
with the financing of a small concern,
has sought an exemption under Section
312 of the Act and Section 107.730,
Financings which Constitute Conflicts
of Interest of the Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and
Regulations (13 CFR 107.730).
Brookside Mezzanine Fund III, L.P.
proposes to provide debt and equity
financing to Media Source, Inc., 7858
Industrial Pkwy, Plain City, OH 43064.
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages requiring clearance
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
1, 1995. This notice includes a new
information collection, and revisions of
OMB-approved information collections.
SSA is soliciting comments on the
accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate; the need for the information;
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
minimize burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Mail, email, or
fax your comments and
recommendations on the information
collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer
and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at
the following addresses or fax numbers.
(OMB) Office of Management and
Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA,
Fax: 202–395–6974, Email address:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
(SSA) Social Security Administration,
OLCA, Attn: Reports Clearance
Director, 3100 West High Rise, 6401
Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235,
Fax: 410–966–2830, Email address:
OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov.
I. The information collections below
are pending at SSA. SSA will submit
them to OMB within 60 days from the
date of this notice. To be sure we
consider your comments, we must
receive them no later than September 2,
2014. Individuals can obtain copies of
the collection instruments by writing to
the above email address.
1. Statement of Funds You Provided
to Another and Statement of Funds You
Received—20 CFR 404.1520(b),
404.1571–404.1576, 404.1584–404.1593
and 416.971–416.976—0960–0059. SSA
uses Form SSA–821–BK to collect
employment information to determine
whether applicants or recipients worked
after becoming disabled and, if so,
whether the work is substantial gainful
activity. SSA’s field offices use Form
SSA–821–BK to obtain work
information during the initial claims
process, the continuing disability
review process, and for Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) claims involving
work issues. SSA’s processing centers
and the Office of Disability and
International Operations use the form to
obtain post-adjudicative work issue
from recipients. SSA reviews and
evaluates the data to determine if the
applicant or recipient meets the
disability requirements of the law. The
respondents are Title II and Title XVI
disability applicants or recipients.
Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Modality of completion
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Estimated total
annual burden
(hours)
SSA–821–BK ...................................................................................................
300,000
1
30
150,000
2. Coverage of Employees of State and
Local Governments—20 CFR 404,
17 17
Subpart M—0960–0425. The Code of
Federal Regulations at 20 CFR 404,
Subpart M, prescribes the rules for
States submitting reports of deposits
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Jul 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37825-37828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72482; File No. SR-CBOE-2014-051]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Strike Settings for Mini-S&P 500 Index
Options
June 26, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 25, 2014, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Interpretation and Policy .11 to
Rule 24.9 (Terms of Index Options Contracts) by modifying the strike
setting regime for Mini-S&P 500 Index (``XSP'') options.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx),
at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Interpretation and Policy .11 to
Rule 24.9 (``Interpretation and Policy .11'') by modifying the strike
setting regime for Mini-S&P 500 Index (``XSP'') options. Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing to more closely align: (1) The permitted
strike prices in XSP options with scaled corresponding strikes in full
value S&P 500 Index (``SPX'') options; and (2) the exercise price range
limitations for XSP options with the exercise price range limitations
for equity and exchange traded fund (``ETF'') options. Through this
filing, the Exchange hopes to make XSP options easier for investors to
use and more tailored to their investment needs.
Over two decades ago, CBOE introduced XSP options in order to allow
smaller-scale investors to gain broad exposure to the SPX options
market and hedge S&P 500 Index cash positions.\3\ XSP options are
reduced value options that are equal to 1/10th of the value of the S&P
500 Index and have a multiplier of $100. For example, if the S&P 500
Index is at 1932.56, the XSP Index would have a value of 193.26 and the
notional value of an XSP option would be $19,326. As the Commission
noted in the XSP option Approval Order,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32893 (September 14,
1993), 58 FR 49070 (September 21, 1993) (Order approving listing of
reduced-value options on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index) (SR-
CBOE-93-12).
reduced-value SPX options may benefit investors by providing them
with a relatively low-cost means to hedge their portfolios. The
Commission also believes that the lower cost of the reduced-value
SPX options should allow investors to hedge their portfolios with a
smaller outlay of capital and may facilitate participation in the
market for SPX options, which should, in turn, help to maintain the
depth and liquidity of the market for SPX options, thereby
protecting investors and the public interest.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 58 FR at 49071.
As the Commission anticipated, XSP options provide retail investors
with the benefit of trading the broad market in a manageably sized
contract.
[[Page 37826]]
Under current Interpretation and Policy .11 ``the interval between
strike prices of series of Mini-SPX options will be $1 or greater where
the strike price is $200 or less and $5.00 or greater where the strike
price is greater than $200.'' \5\ Currently, the XSP Index is hovering
close to 200, reflecting levels near 2000 in the S&P 500 Index. As a
result, the Exchange has received customer requests to add strike
prices in XSP options that exceed $200. Specifically, customers have
requested strike prices in the XSP options scaled to match strike
prices in the SPX options. Under existing Interpretation and Policy
.11, the Exchange is unable to list some of the requested strikes. For
example, currently, SPX options have strike prices that include 2010,
2020 and 2030. In order to list corresponding scaled strikes in XSP
options, CBOE would need the ability to list the following strikes:
201, 202 and 203. The listing of strikes in those increments, however,
is not permitted under current Interpretation and Policy .11. Rather,
the Exchange currently only has the ability to list a 200 strike price
and a 205 strike price in XSP options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Rule 24.9.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, exercise prices for XSP options must be within 30% of
the current XSP value.\6\ Exercise prices more than 30% away from the
current XSP level are permitted provided there is demonstrated customer
interest for such exercise prices. Through this filing, the Exchange is
proposing to align the exercise price range limitations for XSP options
with the exercise price range limitations for equity and ETF
options.\7\ The following example illustrates the different exercise
price range limitations between XSP options and equity and ETF options.
If the underlying price of an equity or ETF option is $200, the
Exchange would be permitted to list strikes ranging from $100 through
$300. If the underlying level of the XSP is 200, the Exchange would
only be permitted to list strikes ranging from $140 to $260. To put XSP
options on equal standing with equity and ETF options in terms of
exercise price range limitations, the Exchange proposes to replace the
30% current index level strike setting band for XSP
options with the strike setting band that currently exists for equity
and ETF options. The Exchange believes that the existing strike setting
regime for XSP options is unnecessarily restrictive and thus, proposes
to establish a new strike setting regime for XSP options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Rule 24.9.04 generally provides that exercise prices for
index options must be within 30% of the current index value.
Exercise prices more than 30% away from the current index level are
permitted provided there is demonstrated customer interest for such
exercise prices.
\7\ Rule 5.5A (Select Provisions of Options Listing Procedures
Plan) sets forth the exercise price range limitations for equity and
ETF options, which are identical to those being proposed for XSP
options in the current filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to more closely align strike prices between reduced value
XSP options and full value SPX options and to align the exercise price
range limitations for XSP options with the existing price range
limitations for equity and ETF options, CBOE proposes to amend
Interpretation and Policy .11 as follows:
If the current value of the Mini-SPX is less than or equal
to 20, the Exchange shall not list series with an exercise price of
more than 100% above or below the current value of the Mini-SPX; \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange is proposing to exclude XSP options from the
provisions of Rules 24.9.01(a), 24.01(d) and 24.9.04. Rule
24.9.01(a) identifies those indexes for which the minimum strike
price interval is $2.50. Rules 24.9.01(d) and 24.9.04 set forth 30%
ranges for setting strike prices based on the current index level,
which are in conflict with the percentages proposed in this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the current value of the Mini-SPX is greater than 20,
the Exchange shall not list series with an exercise price of more than
50% above or below the current value of the Mini-SPX; and
The lowest strike price interval that may be listed for
Mini-SPX options is $1, including for LEAPS.
The Exchange believes that the above strike price setting regime
would permit strikes to be set to more closely reflect the current
values in the underlying S&P 500 Index would provide flexibility and
allow the Exchange to better respond to customer demand for XSP options
strike prices that better relate to current S&P 500 Index values. In
addition, the Exchange believes that because the number of strikes that
may be listed would be contained by the percentages above and below the
current XSP Index value, there is no need to artificially restrict the
use of $1 strike price intervals based on the exercise price. Rather,
the Exchange may determine to list strikes in $1 intervals or higher
based on the level of the XSP Index, customer demand and the need to
list scaled strikes in reduced value XSP options that correspond to
strikes in full value SPX options. Also, the Exchange believes that
there is no reason to have a more limited range of strikes for XSP
options than is currently permitted for equity or ETF options.
The Exchange recognizes that the proposed approach does not achieve
full harmonization between strikes in XSP options and SPX options. For
example, if there is a 2015 strike in SPX options, CBOE is not seeking
the ability to list a 201.50 strike in XSP options. CBOE believes that
having the ability to list the 201 and 202 strikes in XSP options would
provide the marketplace with a sufficient number of strike prices over
a range of XSP Index values.\9\ The Exchange believes that these
changes would allow retail investors to better use XSP options to gain
exposure to the SPX options market and hedge S&P 500 cash positions in
the event that the S&P 500 Index surpasses 2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In the future, the Exchange may request via a rule filing to
have even finer strike price increments for XSP options and nothing
herein is meant to imply or preclude the Exchange from doing so in
the future if the need arises.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The S&P 500 Index is widely regarded as the best single gauge of
large cap U.S. equities. As a result, individual investors often use
S&P 500 Index-related products to diversify their portfolios and
benefit from market trends. Full size SPX options offer these benefits
to investors, but may be expensive with a notional value that exceeds
$190,000 per contract and are primarily used by institutional market
participants. By contrast, reduced value XSP options offer individual
investors the ability to benefit from S&P 500 Index options at much
lower cost.
The Exchange has analyzed its capacity and represents that it
believes the Exchange and the Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary systems capacity to handle the additional traffic
associated with proposed revised strike setting regime for XSP options.
Because the rule change proposes to continue to only list strikes
within a certain band relative to current S&P 500 Index levels, the
number of listed strikes would remain contained. In addition, the
proposal is limited to a single option class (XSP).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\10\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
[[Page 37827]]
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \12\
requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit
unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the proposed rule change would add consistency to
the S&P 500 Index options markets and allow investors to more easily
use XSP options. Moreover, the proposed rule change would allow small
investors to better hedge positions in the S&P 500 Index cash market
with XSP options and ensure that XSP options investors are not at a
disadvantage with respect to larger institutional investors in the SPX
options.
The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\13\ which provides that the Exchange
be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes
of the Act and to enforce compliance by the Exchange's Trading Permit
Holders and persons associated with its Trading Permit Holders with the
Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule would
create additional capacity issues or affect market functionality. The
rule change proposes to allow the Exchange to respond to customer
demand by listing strike prices in the XSP options scaled to match
strike prices in the SPX options. The number of XSP strikes that may be
listed, however, would not be unbounded. This would be accomplished by
limiting the interval between strike prices of series of XSP options to
$1 or greater when the strike price is greater than 20 and by
prohibiting the Exchange from listing series with an exercise price of
more than 50% above or below the current value of the XSP (which is
identical to what is currently permitted for equity and ETF options).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would relieve any burden on, or
otherwise promote, competition in the S&P 500 Index-related markets.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would bolster
intramarket competition by affording individual investors in XSP
options investment opportunities that are similar to those that are
available to investors in SPX options. In addition, the proposed rule
change would allow investors in XSP options to better hedge positions
in the S&P 500 Index cash market in a manner similar to larger
investors in the SPX options market. The Exchange also believes that
the proposed rule change would make XSP options easier for investors to
use because the options would more accurately reflect positions in the
underlying cash market. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would contribute to intramarket competition and a
more robust marketplace. Notably, all market participants would have
the same access to XSP options and would be able to use XSP options
products to appropriately suit their investment needs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange stated that waiver of this requirement will allow
the Exchange to respond to current customer demand for strike prices in
XSP options that are scaled to match existing strikes prices in SPX
options. For this reason, the Commission believes that the proposed
rule change presents no novel issues and that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule
change to be operative upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2014-051 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2014-051. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
[[Page 37828]]
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2014-051 and should be
submitted on or before July 23, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-15475 Filed 7-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P