Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 37284-37286 [2014-15418]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
37284
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8
of the Regulations states that the Bureau
of Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
I have received notice of Almeida’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
have provided notice and an
opportunity for Almeida to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided
in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I
have not received a submission from
Almeida.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Almeida’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of
Almeida’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Almeida had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Ordered
I. Until December 8, 2022, Luis
Alejandro Yanez Almeida, with a last
known address at: Inmate # 07362–379,
Big Spring, Correctional Institution,
2001 Rickabaugh Dr., Big Spring, TXC
79720, and when acting for or on behalf
of Almeida, his representatives, assigns,
agents or employees (the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:00 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Almeida by
affiliation, ownership, control or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the
Order.
IV. This Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until December 8, 2022.
V. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Almeida may file an appeal
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
VI. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Almeida. This Order
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
Issued this 24th day of June, 2014.
Eileen M. Albanese,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–15392 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 26, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of its administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the
period November 1, 2011, through
October 31, 2012.1 As a result of our
analysis of the comments received,
these final result differ from our
Preliminary Results. For these final
results, we find the subject merchandise
has been sold at prices less than normal
value.
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–
2778, respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
Following the Preliminary Results,
from January 20 through 24, 2014, the
Department conducted a verification of
Husteel Co. Ltd.’s (Husteel) sales
questionnaire responses.
1 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 78336
(December 26, 2013) (Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Notices
On April 7, 2014, the Department
issued a memorandum extending the
time period for issuing the final results
of this administrative review from April
25, 2014 to June 24, 2014, as permitted
by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2).2
We received case briefs from
Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland)
and Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO) on May
9, 2014. On May 14, 2014, Husteel,
Wheatland and the United States Steel
Corporation (U.S. Steel) each submitted
rebuttal briefs. We rejected Husteel’s
and U.S. Steel’s rebuttal briefs on June
4, 2014 because each contained new
factual information. Husteel and U.S.
Steel each resubmitted rebuttal briefs
without the new factual information on
June 5, 2014 and June 6, 2014,
respectively.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
and tube. The product is currently
classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25,
7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40,
7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and
7306.30.50.90. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains dispositive.
A full description of the scope of the
order is contained in the memorandum
from James Maeder, Director, Office II,
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the 2011–2012
Administrative Review of Circular
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the
Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), and which is hereby
adopted by this notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties’ briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
is attached to this notice as an
Appendix. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
2 See Memorandum from Mary Kolberg, to Gary
Taverman, Senior Advisor for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations entitled ‘‘Circular
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of
Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:00 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and it
is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes From the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from interested
parties, we made certain adjustments to
Husteel’s costs.3 We also incorporated
the minor corrections to Husteel’s U.S.
sales presented by Husteel at
verification.4
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period November 1, 2011, through
October 31, 2012:
Producer/exporter
Husteel Co., Ltd. .........................
Hyundai HYSCO .........................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.59
3.39
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations used
in our analysis to parties to these
proceedings within five days of the date
of the release of this notice pursuant to
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department determines, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results
of review.
For assessment purposes, Husteel and
HYSCO reported the name of the
importer of record and the entered value
3 See Comment 1 of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
4 See Memorandum to The File from Jennifer
Meek, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
Enforcement and Compliance Office I, ‘‘Circular
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of
Korea: Final Calculation Memorandum for Husteel
Co., Ltd.’’ (June 24, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37285
for all of their sales to the United States
during the period of review (POR).
Accordingly, for each respondent, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
antidumping duty assessment rates on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for the importer’s
examined sales and the total entered
value of those same sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Husteel
and HYSCO for which they did not
know were destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Husteel and
HYSCO will be equal to the respective
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which that manufacturer
or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 4.80
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
37286
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Notices
pursuant to a court decision.5 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
[FR Doc. 2014–15418 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 24, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the fourth administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on citric acid and certain citrate salts
(citric acid) from Canada.1 The review
covers one producer and exporter of the
subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer
Canada Inc. (JBL Canada). The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2012, through
April 30, 2013.
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
changes to our margin calculations. The
final weighted-average dumping margin
for JBL Canada is listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results of administrative
review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comment 7: Application of a Differential
Pricing Analysis
Comment 8: Denial of Offsets for NonDumped Sales With the Average-toTransaction Method
Comment 9: Withdrawal of the Regulations
Governing Targeted Dumping in LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Cost Reallocation—Husteel
Comment 2: General and Administrative
Expenses, Rental Income Offset—Husteel
Comment 3: General and Administrative
Expenses, Miscellaneous Income Offset—
Husteel
Comment 4: General and Administrative
Expenses, Litigation Accrual—HYSCO
Comment 5: Capping of Interest Revenue—
HYSCO
Comment 6: Consideration of an Alternative
Comparison Method in an Administrative
Review
Background
The review covers one producer and
exporter of the subject merchandise, JBL
Canada. On February 24, 2014, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
instant administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on citric acid
from Canada. We invited parties to
5 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended
Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3,
1995).
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From
Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 10093
(February 24, 2014) (Preliminary Results).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:00 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comment on the preliminary results of
the review. In March 2014, we received
case and rebuttal briefs from Archer
Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the petitioners) and JBL Canada. The
Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is citric acid and certain citrate
salts. The product is currently classified
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) at item
numbers 2918.14.0000 and
2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000 and
3824.90.9290. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the full written
scope description, as described in the
memorandum entitled ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of the 2012–2013 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Citric
Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Canada,’’ dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum), remains
dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2012, through
April 30, 2013.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in the case
and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as Appendix I. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov; the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit
(CRU), room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since The Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we recalculated JBL Canada’s
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37284-37286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15418]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 26, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of its administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel
pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period November
1, 2011, through October 31, 2012.\1\ As a result of our analysis of
the comments received, these final result differ from our Preliminary
Results. For these final results, we find the subject merchandise has
been sold at prices less than normal value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic
of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 78336 (December 26,
2013) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1785
or (202) 482-2778, respectively.
Background
Following the Preliminary Results, from January 20 through 24,
2014, the Department conducted a verification of Husteel Co. Ltd.'s
(Husteel) sales questionnaire responses.
[[Page 37285]]
On April 7, 2014, the Department issued a memorandum extending the
time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review
from April 25, 2014 to June 24, 2014, as permitted by section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum from Mary Kolberg, to Gary Taverman, Senior
Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations entitled
``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received case briefs from Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland) and
Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO) on May 9, 2014. On May 14, 2014, Husteel,
Wheatland and the United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) each
submitted rebuttal briefs. We rejected Husteel's and U.S. Steel's
rebuttal briefs on June 4, 2014 because each contained new factual
information. Husteel and U.S. Steel each resubmitted rebuttal briefs
without the new factual information on June 5, 2014 and June 6, 2014,
respectively.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy
steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32,
7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90.
Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.
A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the
memorandum from James Maeder, Director, Office II, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
2011-2012 Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum), and which is hereby adopted by this
notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached
to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes From the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties, we made certain adjustments to Husteel's costs.\3\ We also
incorporated the minor corrections to Husteel's U.S. sales presented by
Husteel at verification.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Comment 1 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\4\ See Memorandum to The File from Jennifer Meek, International
Trade Compliance Analyst, Enforcement and Compliance Office I,
``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Final Calculation Memorandum for Husteel Co., Ltd.'' (June 24,
2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2011,
through October 31, 2012:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Husteel Co., Ltd............................................ 0.59
Hyundai HYSCO............................................... 3.39
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties
to these proceedings within five days of the date of the release of
this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department determines, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
For assessment purposes, Husteel and HYSCO reported the name of the
importer of record and the entered value for all of their sales to the
United States during the period of review (POR). Accordingly, for each
respondent, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel and HYSCO for which they
did not know were destined for the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate
for Husteel and HYSCO will be equal to the respective weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which
that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 4.80 percent, the ``all others'' rate established
[[Page 37286]]
pursuant to a court decision.\5\ These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea: Notice
of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination, 60 FR 55833
(November 3, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Cost Reallocation--Husteel
Comment 2: General and Administrative Expenses, Rental Income
Offset--Husteel
Comment 3: General and Administrative Expenses, Miscellaneous Income
Offset--Husteel
Comment 4: General and Administrative Expenses, Litigation Accrual--
HYSCO
Comment 5: Capping of Interest Revenue--HYSCO
Comment 6: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method in an
Administrative Review
Comment 7: Application of a Differential Pricing Analysis
Comment 8: Denial of Offsets for Non-Dumped Sales With the Average-
to-Transaction Method
Comment 9: Withdrawal of the Regulations Governing Targeted Dumping
in Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
[FR Doc. 2014-15418 Filed 6-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
