Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Partially Terminate the Investigation, and on Review To Modify the Initial Determination, 37351-37352 [2014-15413]

Download as PDF emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Notices (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2013 (report quantity data in units and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2013 (report quantity data in units and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and dutypaid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:00 Jun 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 25, 2014. Jennifer D. Rohrbach, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2014–15230 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37351 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–Ta–907] Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Partially Terminate the Investigation, and on Review To Modify the Initial Determination U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend complaint and notice of investigation and to partially terminate the investigation. On review, the Commission has modified the ID to specify the claims of the patents that have been added to the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3115. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on January 28, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Magna Electronics Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan (‘‘Magna,’’ or Complainant). See 79 FR 4490–91 (Jan. 28, 2014). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES 37352 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Notices 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain vision-based driver assistance system cameras and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,116,929 and 8,593,521 (‘‘the ’521 patent’’). The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The respondent named in the Commission’s notice of investigation is TRW Automotive U.S., LLC of Livonia, Michigan (‘‘TRW,’’ or Respondent). A Commission investigative attorney (‘‘the IA’’) is participating in the investigation. On April 10, 2014, Complainant Magna filed a motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add U.S. Patent Nos. 8,686,840 (‘‘the ’840 patent’’) and 8,692,659 (‘‘the ’659 patent’’). Magna’s motion also included a conditional element whereby if the motion to amend is granted, then Magna moves to terminate the investigation in part as to all claims of the ’521 patent. On April 21, 2014, Respondent filed a response opposing the motion. On the same day, the IA filed a response to Magna’s motion stating that she does not oppose the motion. On May 27, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID finding that good cause exists to grant Complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add the ’840 and ’659 patents to this investigation and to terminate the investigation as to the ’521 patent. On June 4, 2014, Respondent filed a timely petition for review of ALJ Order No. 6. On June 11, 2014, Complainant and the IA timely filed their respective responses opposing the petition. Having examined the record in this investigation, including the subject ID, the petition for review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has determined to review the ID in part. Specifically, the Commission determined to review the first paragraph on page 7 of the subject ID and, on review, to modify it by clarifying that the notice of investigation is modified by adding claims 30 and 36 of the ’840 patent and claims 3, 37, 80, and 92 of the ’659 patent, as well as by terminating the investigation as to all claims of the ’521 patent. The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:00 Jun 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 By order of the Commission. Issued: June 26, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission [FR Doc. 2014–15413 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1140–0076] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Relief of Disabilities and Application for Restoration of Explosives Privileges Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until September 2, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact William Joa at William.Joa@atf.gov or Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Redstone Arsenal, Bldg. 3750, Huntsville, AL 35898. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection 1140–0076: 1. Type of Information Collection: Revision of an existing collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Relief of Disabilities and Application for Restoration of Explosives Privileges. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form number: ATF Form 5400.29. Component: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Business or other for-profit. Other: Individual or households. Abstract: Any person prohibited from shipping or transporting any explosive in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or from receiving or possessing any explosive which has been shipped or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce may make application for relief from disabilities. ATF F 5400.29 is required in order to determine whether or not explosives privileges may be restored. The form is used to conduct an investigation to establish if it is likely that the applicant will act in a manner dangerous to public safety or contrary to public interest. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: An estimated 231 respondents will take 30 minutes to complete the form. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The estimated annual public burden associated with this collection is 116 hours. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E–405B, Washington, DC 20530. E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37351-37352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-Ta-907]


Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and 
Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part an 
Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend Complaint 
and Notice of Investigation and Partially Terminate the Investigation, 
and on Review To Modify the Initial Determination

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 6) issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting complainant's motion to amend complaint and notice 
of investigation and to partially terminate the investigation. On 
review, the Commission has modified the ID to specify the claims of the 
patents that have been added to the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 
1337, on January 28, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Magna 
Electronics Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan (``Magna,'' or Complainant). 
See 79 FR 4490-91 (Jan. 28, 2014). The complaint alleges violations of 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.

[[Page 37352]]

1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain vision-based driver assistance system cameras and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 
8,116,929 and 8,593,521 (``the '521 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The respondent named in 
the Commission's notice of investigation is TRW Automotive U.S., LLC of 
Livonia, Michigan (``TRW,'' or Respondent). A Commission investigative 
attorney (``the IA'') is participating in the investigation.
    On April 10, 2014, Complainant Magna filed a motion to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to add U.S. Patent Nos. 8,686,840 
(``the '840 patent'') and 8,692,659 (``the '659 patent''). Magna's 
motion also included a conditional element whereby if the motion to 
amend is granted, then Magna moves to terminate the investigation in 
part as to all claims of the '521 patent. On April 21, 2014, Respondent 
filed a response opposing the motion. On the same day, the IA filed a 
response to Magna's motion stating that she does not oppose the motion.
    On May 27, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID finding that good 
cause exists to grant Complainant's motion to amend the complaint and 
notice of investigation to add the '840 and '659 patents to this 
investigation and to terminate the investigation as to the '521 patent. 
On June 4, 2014, Respondent filed a timely petition for review of ALJ 
Order No. 6. On June 11, 2014, Complainant and the IA timely filed 
their respective responses opposing the petition.
    Having examined the record in this investigation, including the 
subject ID, the petition for review, and the responses thereto, the 
Commission has determined to review the ID in part. Specifically, the 
Commission determined to review the first paragraph on page 7 of the 
subject ID and, on review, to modify it by clarifying that the notice 
of investigation is modified by adding claims 30 and 36 of the '840 
patent and claims 3, 37, 80, and 92 of the '659 patent, as well as by 
terminating the investigation as to all claims of the '521 patent. The 
Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
Part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 26, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission
[FR Doc. 2014-15413 Filed 6-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P