Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 36865-36867 [2014-15242]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Notices
Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–0903, Email Linda.Williams@
dot.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel CHRISTI ANNE is:
Intended Commercial Use Of Vessel:
‘‘Small charters for sunset cruises, sight
seeing, and possible sport fishing.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘Maine, New
Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maryland,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York,
New Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia,
Florida.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2014–0091 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0072]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–15249 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2014–0072 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Liza Lemaster-Sandbank, Contracting
Officer’s Representative, Occupant
Protection Division (NTI–112), Office of
Impaired Driving and Occupant
Protection, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W44–302, Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Lemaster-Sandbank’s phone
number is 202–366–4292 and her email
address is liza.lemaster@dot.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36865
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Implementing a Leadership
Framework for Traffic Safety.
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1265,
1266, 1267.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three (3) years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct individual and
group interviews with law enforcement
officers and leadership who are
participating in a leadership framework
demonstration to increase law
enforcement focus on enforcing seat belt
laws. Three law enforcement agencies (a
state agency, a municipal agency, and a
rural sheriff agency) will participate in
the demonstration project, which
includes customized technical
assistance addressing policies,
procedures, data, communication, and
other organizational issues. To assess
how leadership on seat belt enforcement
is communicated and executed
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
36866
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Notices
throughout the demonstration agencies,
NHTSA proposes to conduct a set of
individual interviews with line officers
and individual or group interviews with
leadership within each demonstration
agency. While individual interviews
will work best with line officers, either
group or individual interviews can work
effectively with the senior leadership.
Flexibility is built in to this approach in
order to be mindful of senior
leadership’s scheduling constraints.
Eighteen individuals will be
interviewed at each site for a total of 54
individuals. Each individual will be
interviewed twice: once during the
project implementation and once at the
end of the demonstration project.
Interviewees will either be self-selected
or selected by the demonstration
agencies. The purpose of these
interviews is to document how a law
enforcement agency implements a new
leadership approach for seat belt
enforcement so that the experiences of
the demonstration sites can serve as a
resource to other agencies undertaking
new seat belt enforcement initiatives.
The interviews will be audio taped
using electronic equipment and
augmented by handwritten notes taken
during the discussions. No videotaping
will occur. Any personally identifiable
information will be separated from any
summary information. Also, all
identifying information collected during
initial scheduling will be separated from
collected information, kept on a secure
server in password protected files, and
discarded when no longer needed. All
information collected during the
interviews will be summarized using
generic categories such as law
enforcement leadership or line officers.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety
Act of 1970 (23 U.S.C. 101) to carry out
a Congressional mandate to reduce the
mounting number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs. In 2012,
there were 21,667 occupants of
passenger vehicles who died in motor
vehicle traffic crashes. Of the occupants
for whom restraint status was known,
52% were unrestrained at the time of
the crash. Research shows that wearing
a seatbelt or using a child safety seat can
greatly reduce the chances of fatal or
serious injury as a result of a motor
vehicle collision. In fact, when used,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
seat belts reduce the risk of fatal injury
to front-seat passenger occupants by
45% and to light truck occupants by
60%. Moreover, the nationwide daytime
seat belt use rate was 87% in 2013, and
ranged from 69% to 98% in the states
and territories. Clearly there is work to
be done to increase seat belt use and
reduce unrestrained fatalities due to
motor vehicle crashes. It is critical that
NHTSA continually explore strategies to
increase the use of seat belts among all
occupants of motor vehicles.
High visibility enforcement (i.e.,
highly visible enforcement accompanied
by public information supporting the
enforcement) has been demonstrated to
increase seat belt use. A successful high
visibility enforcement program requires
a written comprehensive plan with
clear, well-defined goals, objectives, and
performance measures; understanding
of costs; funding; support from key
stakeholders within the community; and
aggressive law enforcement of laws. All
of the above can only be accomplished
with strong executive leadership.
A NHTSA-convened work group of
law enforcement representatives from
states with secondary seat belt laws, but
exemplary work in support of occupant
protection enforcement, identified
strong leadership as the critical
component in their successes. Strong
leadership within any law enforcement
agency can result in various practices
and methodologies that spotlight a
program’s importance and help to make
occupant protection, as well as other
traffic safety issues, an integral part of
the agencies’ culture. Regardless of
whether the occupant protection
program is organized as a specialized
unit or broadly integrated within the
routine operations of the law
enforcement agency, key management
and enforcement roles must be clearly
defined and assigned to specific
individuals by the executive staff.
NHTSA is undertaking a study to
implement a leadership model
framework within three law
enforcement agencies selected by
NHTSA, evaluate the process and
determine if the traffic safety outcome of
interest is realized, specifically the
impact on increased seat belt use and
reduction in unrestrained fatalities. To
accomplish this, NHTSA will provide
technical assistance to three law
enforcement demonstration
communities for the implementation of
leadership frameworks in support of
safety initiatives, specifically occupant
protection. Evaluation measures will
involve the independent identification,
collection and evaluation of both
qualitative and quantitative data that
specifically document changes in
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
enforcement activity and its effects on
the surrounding communities’
behaviors. Overall findings will be
provided to other law enforcement
agencies to use as a resource for
improving occupant protection
enforcement programs and efforts.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Under this
proposed effort, a total of 108 interviews
of law enforcement personnel will be
conducted over two time periods.
Eighteen interviews will be conducted
in each of the three demonstration sites,
once during the demonstration
implementation and once at the end of
the demonstration project. Ideally, the
same respondents will be interviewed at
both time periods; however, in the event
that an individual leaves the law
enforcement agency or is otherwise
unavailable for an interview, NHTSA
may replace the individual with another
suitable interviewee.
NHTSA estimates that each interview
will last 60–75 minutes. Interviewees
will represent law enforcement
leadership as well as line officers. Law
enforcement leadership participants
will include the top management in the
agency (colonel, chief, etc.). Line
officers will be recruited through a selfselection process or selected by the
demonstration agencies. Responses will
be collected via audio-recording and
note taking during the interviews.
Throughout the project, the privacy of
all participants will be protected.
Personally-identifiable information
(names, telephone numbers, email
addresses, etc.) will be kept separate
from the data collected, and will be
stored in restricted folders on secure
password-protected servers that are only
accessible to study staff who have need
to access such information. In addition,
all data collected from participating
officers will be reported in aggregate for
each site, and respondent names will
not be used in any reports resulting
from this project. Rigorous deidentification procedures will be used
during summary and feedback stages to
ensure no officers will be identified
through reconstructive means.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—NHTSA estimates that the
duration of each interview will be
seventy-five (75) minutes, or a total of
135 hours for the 54 interview
participants (18 interviewees × 3 sites ×
2 administrations × 75 minutes). The
participants will not incur any reporting
cost from the information collection.
The participants also will not incur any
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Notices
record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Dated: June 25, 2014.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014–15242 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0067]
Decision That Certain Nonconforming
Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Grant of Petitions.
AGENCY:
This document announces
decisions by NHTSA that certain motor
vehicles not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) are eligible for importation
into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles
originally manufactured for sale in the
United States and certified by their
manufacturers as complying with the
safety standards, and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the
standards or because they have safety
features that comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS.
DATES: These decisions became effective
on the dates specified in Annex A.
ADDRESSES: For further information
contact Mr. George Stevens, Office of
Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA
(202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and/or sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS based on
destructive test data or such other
evidence as NHTSA decides to be
adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
NHTSA received petitions from
registered importers to decide whether
the vehicles listed in Annex A to this
notice are eligible for importation into
the United States. To afford an
opportunity for public comment,
NHTSA published notice of these
petitions as specified in Annex A. The
reader is referred to those notices for a
thorough description of the petitions.
Comments: No substantive comments
were received in response to the
petitions identified in Appendix A.
NHTSA Decision: Accordingly, on the
basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby
decides that each motor vehicle listed in
Annex A to this notice, which was not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable FMVSS, is either
substantially similar to a motor vehicle
manufactured for importation into and/
or sale in the United States, and
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, as
specified in Annex A, and is capable of
being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS or has safety features
that comply with, or are capable of
being altered to comply with, all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards.
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject
Vehicles: The importer of a vehicle
admissible under any final decision
must indicate on the form HS–7
accompanying entry the appropriate
vehicle eligibility number indicating
that the vehicle is eligible for entry.
Vehicle eligibility numbers assigned to
vehicles admissible under this decision
are specified in Annex A.
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36867
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegations
of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance.
Annex A—Nonconforming Motor
Vehicles Decided To Be Eligible for
Importation
1. Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0103
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1992 Jeep
Wrangler Multipurpose Passenger
Vehicles
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified
Vehicles: 1992 Jeep Wrangler
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Notice of Petition Published at: 78 FR
65756 (November 1, 2013)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–562
(effective date December 16, 2013)
2. Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0104
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2011–2012
BMW S1000RR Motorcycles
Substantially Similar U.S.-Certified
Vehicles: 2011–2012 BMW S1000RR
Motorcycles
Notice of Petition Published at: 78 FR
65758 (November 1, 2013)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–563
(effective date December 16, 2013)
3. Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0106
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2011
Mitsubishi Outlander Multipurpose
Passenger Vehicles (Manufactured for
the Mexican market)
Substantially Similar U.S.-Certified
Vehicles: 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
Notice of Petition Published at: 79 FR
16098 (March 24, 2014)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–564
(effective date May 9, 2014)
4. Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0036
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2012 AHLM
SPT 16–25 Trailers
Because there are no substantially
similar U.S.-certified version 2012
AHLM SPT 16–25 Trailers the
petitioner sought import eligibility
under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Petition Published at: 78 FR
65759 (November 1, 2013)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VCP–55
(effective date December 13, 2013)
5. Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0105
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1994 and
1997 Westfalia 14 ft Double Axle
Cargo Trailers
Because there are no substantially
similar U.S.-certified version 1994
and 1997 Westfalia 14 ft Double Axle
Cargo Trailers the petitioner sought
import eligibility under 49 U.S.C.
30141(a)(1)(B).
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36865-36867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0072]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2014-0072 using any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Liza Lemaster-Sandbank,
Contracting Officer's Representative, Occupant Protection Division
(NTI-112), Office of Impaired Driving and Occupant Protection, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W44-
302, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Lemaster-Sandbank's phone number is 202-
366-4292 and her email address is liza.lemaster@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Title: Implementing a Leadership Framework for Traffic Safety.
Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1265, 1266, 1267.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three (3) years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct individual
and group interviews with law enforcement officers and leadership who
are participating in a leadership framework demonstration to increase
law enforcement focus on enforcing seat belt laws. Three law
enforcement agencies (a state agency, a municipal agency, and a rural
sheriff agency) will participate in the demonstration project, which
includes customized technical assistance addressing policies,
procedures, data, communication, and other organizational issues. To
assess how leadership on seat belt enforcement is communicated and
executed
[[Page 36866]]
throughout the demonstration agencies, NHTSA proposes to conduct a set
of individual interviews with line officers and individual or group
interviews with leadership within each demonstration agency. While
individual interviews will work best with line officers, either group
or individual interviews can work effectively with the senior
leadership. Flexibility is built in to this approach in order to be
mindful of senior leadership's scheduling constraints. Eighteen
individuals will be interviewed at each site for a total of 54
individuals. Each individual will be interviewed twice: once during the
project implementation and once at the end of the demonstration
project. Interviewees will either be self-selected or selected by the
demonstration agencies. The purpose of these interviews is to document
how a law enforcement agency implements a new leadership approach for
seat belt enforcement so that the experiences of the demonstration
sites can serve as a resource to other agencies undertaking new seat
belt enforcement initiatives.
The interviews will be audio taped using electronic equipment and
augmented by handwritten notes taken during the discussions. No
videotaping will occur. Any personally identifiable information will be
separated from any summary information. Also, all identifying
information collected during initial scheduling will be separated from
collected information, kept on a secure server in password protected
files, and discarded when no longer needed. All information collected
during the interviews will be summarized using generic categories such
as law enforcement leadership or line officers.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 (23 U.S.C. 101) to
carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the mounting number of
deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle
crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate,
NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards and traffic safety programs. In
2012, there were 21,667 occupants of passenger vehicles who died in
motor vehicle traffic crashes. Of the occupants for whom restraint
status was known, 52% were unrestrained at the time of the crash.
Research shows that wearing a seatbelt or using a child safety seat can
greatly reduce the chances of fatal or serious injury as a result of a
motor vehicle collision. In fact, when used, seat belts reduce the risk
of fatal injury to front-seat passenger occupants by 45% and to light
truck occupants by 60%. Moreover, the nationwide daytime seat belt use
rate was 87% in 2013, and ranged from 69% to 98% in the states and
territories. Clearly there is work to be done to increase seat belt use
and reduce unrestrained fatalities due to motor vehicle crashes. It is
critical that NHTSA continually explore strategies to increase the use
of seat belts among all occupants of motor vehicles.
High visibility enforcement (i.e., highly visible enforcement
accompanied by public information supporting the enforcement) has been
demonstrated to increase seat belt use. A successful high visibility
enforcement program requires a written comprehensive plan with clear,
well-defined goals, objectives, and performance measures; understanding
of costs; funding; support from key stakeholders within the community;
and aggressive law enforcement of laws. All of the above can only be
accomplished with strong executive leadership.
A NHTSA-convened work group of law enforcement representatives from
states with secondary seat belt laws, but exemplary work in support of
occupant protection enforcement, identified strong leadership as the
critical component in their successes. Strong leadership within any law
enforcement agency can result in various practices and methodologies
that spotlight a program's importance and help to make occupant
protection, as well as other traffic safety issues, an integral part of
the agencies' culture. Regardless of whether the occupant protection
program is organized as a specialized unit or broadly integrated within
the routine operations of the law enforcement agency, key management
and enforcement roles must be clearly defined and assigned to specific
individuals by the executive staff.
NHTSA is undertaking a study to implement a leadership model
framework within three law enforcement agencies selected by NHTSA,
evaluate the process and determine if the traffic safety outcome of
interest is realized, specifically the impact on increased seat belt
use and reduction in unrestrained fatalities. To accomplish this, NHTSA
will provide technical assistance to three law enforcement
demonstration communities for the implementation of leadership
frameworks in support of safety initiatives, specifically occupant
protection. Evaluation measures will involve the independent
identification, collection and evaluation of both qualitative and
quantitative data that specifically document changes in enforcement
activity and its effects on the surrounding communities' behaviors.
Overall findings will be provided to other law enforcement agencies to
use as a resource for improving occupant protection enforcement
programs and efforts.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Under this proposed effort, a total of 108 interviews of law
enforcement personnel will be conducted over two time periods. Eighteen
interviews will be conducted in each of the three demonstration sites,
once during the demonstration implementation and once at the end of the
demonstration project. Ideally, the same respondents will be
interviewed at both time periods; however, in the event that an
individual leaves the law enforcement agency or is otherwise
unavailable for an interview, NHTSA may replace the individual with
another suitable interviewee.
NHTSA estimates that each interview will last 60-75 minutes.
Interviewees will represent law enforcement leadership as well as line
officers. Law enforcement leadership participants will include the top
management in the agency (colonel, chief, etc.). Line officers will be
recruited through a self-selection process or selected by the
demonstration agencies. Responses will be collected via audio-recording
and note taking during the interviews.
Throughout the project, the privacy of all participants will be
protected. Personally-identifiable information (names, telephone
numbers, email addresses, etc.) will be kept separate from the data
collected, and will be stored in restricted folders on secure password-
protected servers that are only accessible to study staff who have need
to access such information. In addition, all data collected from
participating officers will be reported in aggregate for each site, and
respondent names will not be used in any reports resulting from this
project. Rigorous de-identification procedures will be used during
summary and feedback stages to ensure no officers will be identified
through reconstructive means.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--NHTSA estimates that the
duration of each interview will be seventy-five (75) minutes, or a
total of 135 hours for the 54 interview participants (18 interviewees x
3 sites x 2 administrations x 75 minutes). The participants will not
incur any reporting cost from the information collection. The
participants also will not incur any
[[Page 36867]]
record keeping burden or record keeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Dated: June 25, 2014.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-15242 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P