Certain Sulfentrazone, Sulfentrazone Compositions, and Processes for Making Sulfentrazone; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and the Notice of Investigation, 36559 [2014-15055]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–914] Certain Sulfentrazone, Sulfentrazone Compositions, and Processes for Making Sulfentrazone; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and the Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on May 29, 2014, granting the complainant’s unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to change the name of a respondent. SUMMARY: wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 14, 2014, based on a complaint filed by FMC Corporation (‘‘FMC’’). 79 FR 20907–08. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain sulfentrazone, sulfentrazone compositions, and processes for making sulfentrazone, by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:30 Jun 26, 2014 Jkt 232001 7,169,952. Id. at 20907. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Beijing Nutrichem Science and Technology Stock Co., Ltd., of Beijing, China; Summit Agro USA, LLC, of Cary, North Carolina; Summit Agro North America Holding Corporation of New York, New York; and Jiangxi Heyi Chemicals Co. Ltd. of Jiujiang City, China. Id. at 20908. On May 23, 2014, FMC filed an unopposed motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation to change the name of respondent Beijing Nutrichem Science and Technology Stock Co., Ltd., to Nutrichem Co., Ltd. FMC states that Beijing Nutrichem Science and Technology Stock Co., Ltd. is the literal English translation of the company’s Chinese name, but that the company’s recent response to the complaint explained that the company’s proper English-language name is Nutrichem Co., Ltd. FMC contends that good cause exists to amend the complaint because Nutrichem Co., Ltd. received proper notice of the proceedings, and that such amendment is in the public interest because the name correction will prevent confusion should any remedy be granted in this investigation. On May 29, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting FMC’s motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation. The ALJ found good cause for granting the motion because the amendment will prevent confusion, and, prejudice, if any, will be minimal. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 23, 2014. Jennifer D. Rohrbach, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2014–15055 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1122–0005] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Currently Approved Collection Office on Violence Against Women, Department of Justice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTION: 36559 60-Day notice. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until August 26, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Cathy Poston, Office on Violence Against Women, at 202–514–5430. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Office on Violence Against Women, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. SUMMARY: Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: SemiAnnual Progress Report for Grants to E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 124 (Friday, June 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 36559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15055]



[[Page 36559]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-914]


Certain Sulfentrazone, Sulfentrazone Compositions, and Processes 
for Making Sulfentrazone; Notice of Commission Determination Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend 
the Complaint and the Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') on May 29, 2014, granting the complainant's unopposed motion 
to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to change the name 
of a respondent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 14, 2014, based on a complaint filed by FMC Corporation 
(``FMC''). 79 FR 20907-08. The complaint alleges violations of section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 
337''), in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain sulfentrazone, sulfentrazone compositions, and processes for 
making sulfentrazone, by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent No. 7,169,952. Id. at 20907. The Commission's notice of 
investigation named as respondents Beijing Nutrichem Science and 
Technology Stock Co., Ltd., of Beijing, China; Summit Agro USA, LLC, of 
Cary, North Carolina; Summit Agro North America Holding Corporation of 
New York, New York; and Jiangxi Heyi Chemicals Co. Ltd. of Jiujiang 
City, China. Id. at 20908.
    On May 23, 2014, FMC filed an unopposed motion to amend the 
complaint and the notice of investigation to change the name of 
respondent Beijing Nutrichem Science and Technology Stock Co., Ltd., to 
Nutrichem Co., Ltd. FMC states that Beijing Nutrichem Science and 
Technology Stock Co., Ltd. is the literal English translation of the 
company's Chinese name, but that the company's recent response to the 
complaint explained that the company's proper English-language name is 
Nutrichem Co., Ltd. FMC contends that good cause exists to amend the 
complaint because Nutrichem Co., Ltd. received proper notice of the 
proceedings, and that such amendment is in the public interest because 
the name correction will prevent confusion should any remedy be granted 
in this investigation.
    On May 29, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting FMC's 
motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation. The ALJ 
found good cause for granting the motion because the amendment will 
prevent confusion, and, prejudice, if any, will be minimal. No 
petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 23, 2014.
Jennifer D. Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2014-15055 Filed 6-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.