Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2012/2013, 36003-36009 [2014-14912]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
in the investigation.6 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notification to Importers
[A–570–967]
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission, in Part; 2012/2013
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of Methodology
Comparisons to Normal Value
Product Comparisons
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
Date of Sale
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability
B. Level of Trade
C. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Home Market Prices
3. Results of COP Test
D. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
Market Prices
E. Calculation of NV Based On Constructed
Value
Currency Conversion
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–14911 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
6 Implementation of the Findings of the WTO
Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial
Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders,
72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
International Trade Administration
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on aluminum
extrusions from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April
30, 2013. The review covers the
following exporters of subject
merchandise: mandatory respondents
Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho
Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
(collectively ‘‘Jangho’’), and the single
entity comprised of Guang Ya
Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guang
Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), Kong Ah
International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong Ah’’), and
Guang Ya Aluminum Industries (Hong
Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya HK’’)
(collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’);
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped
Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped
Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively
‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya
Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang
Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’); and
Kromet International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a
voluntary respondent. The Department
preliminarily finds that Kromet did not
make sales of subject merchandise at
less than normal value. In addition, the
Department preliminarily determines
that Jangho and Guang Ya Group/
Zhongya/Xinya failed to demonstrate
that they were eligible for separate-rate
status and thus have been included in
the PRC-wide entity. We also
preliminarily determine that three
companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric
Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’),
Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), and
Shenzhen Hudson Technology
Development Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen
Hudson’’) had no shipments.
AGENCY:
1 The Department initiated this review on June
28, 2013. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June
28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
36003
Effective: June 25, 2014.
Paul
Stolz or Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4474 or (202) 482–4243,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order 2 is aluminum extrusions which
are shapes and forms, produced by an
extrusion process, made from aluminum
alloys having metallic elements
corresponding to the alloy series
designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).3
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00,
7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91,
7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50,
7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00,
7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98,
8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00,
9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00,
7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10,
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30,
7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30,
7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00,
8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00,
8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15,
8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10,
8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45,
8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00,
8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50,
8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00,
8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00,
8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80,
8503.00.95.20, 8516.90.50.00,
8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90,
2 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR
30650 (May 26, 2011) (‘‘Order’’).
3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with this notice (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum’’) for a complete description of the
scope of the Order.
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
36004
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40,
9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85,
9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80,
9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10,
9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05,
9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80,
9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10,
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05,
9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80,
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15,
9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30,
9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51,
9403.90.80.61, 9506.51.40.00,
9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40,
9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10,
9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30,
9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20,
9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00,
9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80,
9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00,
9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00,
9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00,
9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as
parts of other aluminum products may
be classifiable under the following
additional Chapter 76 subheadings:
7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and
7616.99 as well as under other HTSUS
chapters. In addition, fin evaporator
coils may be classifiable under HTSUS
numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and
8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
Order is dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the
Initiation Notice for which all review
requests have been timely withdrawn
and which were eligible for separate rate
status at the initiation of this review, we
are rescinding this administrative
review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). These companies are
listed at Appendix II to this notice. For
these companies, antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
rates of the cash deposits for estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(2).
For those companies named in the
Initiation Notice for which all review
requests have been withdrawn, but
which were not eligible for separate-rate
status at the initiation of this review, the
Department’s practice is to refrain from
rescinding the review with respect to
these companies at this time. While the
requests for review of these companies
were timely withdrawn, the companies
remain part of the PRC-wide entity.
These companies are listed at Appendix
III to this notice. The PRC-wide entity
is under review for these preliminary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
results. Thus, we are not rescinding this
review with respect to these companies,
but the Department will make a
determination with respect to the PRCwide entity at the conclusion of this
review.
Separate Rates
In the Initiation Notice, we informed
parties of the opportunity to request a
separate rate. In proceedings involving
non-market economy (‘‘NME’’)
countries, the Department begins with a
rebuttable presumption that all
companies within the NME country are
subject to government control and, thus,
should be assigned a single weightedaverage dumping margin. It is the
Department’s policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an
administrative review involving an
NME country this single rate unless an
exporter can demonstrate that it is
sufficiently independent so as to be
entitled to a separate rate. Companies
that wanted to be considered for a
separate rate in this review were
required to timely file a separate-rate
application (‘‘SRA’’) or a separate-rate
certification to demonstrate their
eligibility for a separate rate. Separaterate applications and separate-rate
certifications were due to the
Department within 60 calendar days of
the publication of the Initiation Notice.
In this review, 21 exporters for which
a review was requested did not submit
separate-rate information to rebut the
presumption that, like all companies
within the PRC, they are subject to
government control.4 These companies
are listed at Appendix IV to this notice.
As further discussed in the
Preliminarily Decision Memorandum,
we determine that these entities have
not demonstrated that they operate free
from government control. Thus, we
preliminary determine that they are part
of the PRC-wide entity.
An additional five companies under
review submitted SRAs, but, as further
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, we preliminarily
determine not to grant these companies
a separate rate.5
4 One company, Zhaoqing New Zhongya
Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘New Zhongya’’), was
determined to have been succeeded by Guangdong
Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited
(‘‘Guangdong Zhongya’’) in a changed
circumstances review. See Aluminum Extrusions
From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Changed Circumstances Review, 77 FR 54900
(September 6, 2012). Thus, despite the fact that a
review was initiated of New Zhongya, it is not being
included in this list of companies because its
successor in interest, Guangdong Zhongya, is part
of the Guang Ya/Zhongya/Xinya single entity.
5 These five companies are: (1) Guangdong
Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited; (2)
Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nineteen separate-rate applicants still
under review submitted SRAs and
responses to supplemental
questionnaires which provide sufficient
information to preliminarily determine
that they are entitled to a separate rate.
A full discussion of the basis for
granting these companies a separate rate
can be found in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate
The Department intends to assign to
non-examined, separate-rate companies
the weighted-average dumping margin
assigned to non-examined, separate-rate
companies in the final determination of
the antidumping investigation.6 Neither
the Act nor the Department’s regulations
address the establishment of the rate
applied to individual companies not
selected for examination where the
Department limited its examination in
an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The
Department’s practice in cases involving
limited selection based on exporters
accounting for the largest volumes of
trade has been to look to section
735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs
the Department to avoid calculating an
all-others rate using any rates that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available in investigations. The
Department’s regulations further state
that in calculating the all-others rate
under section 735(c)(5) of the Act, the
Department will exclude estimated
weighted-average dumping margin rates
calculated for voluntary respondents.7
Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides
that, where all rates are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts
available, the Department may use ‘‘any
reasonable method’’ for assigning a rate
to non-examined respondents.
We preliminarily determine that the
application of the rate from the
investigation to the non-examined
separate-rate respondents is consistent
with precedent 8 and the most
Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong
Kong Ltd. (collectively, Jangho); (3) Nidec Sankyo
(Zhejiang) Corporation; (4) Taizhou Lifeng
Manufacturing Corporation; (5) Zhongya Shaped
Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited.
6 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part,
2010/12, 79 FR 96, 99 (January 2, 2014) (‘‘Final
Results of Aluminum Extrusions AR1’’).
7 See 19 CFR 351.204(d)(3). See also Antidumping
Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296, 27310
(May 19, 1997).
8 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
appropriate method to determine the
separate rate in the instant review.9
Pursuant to this method, we are
assigning the margin of 32.79 percent,
the most recent margin (from the lessthan-fair-value investigation) calculated
for the non-examined separate-rate
respondents, to the non-examined
separate-rate respondents in the instant
review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Four companies submitted timely
certifications indicating that they had
no shipments of subject merchandise to
the United States during the POR.10
Consistent with its practice, the
Department asked U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to conduct a
query on potential shipments made by
Gree, Jiuyuan, Shenzhen Hudson and
Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Skyline’’) during the POR; CBP
provided no evidence that contradicted
the claims of no shipments submitted by
Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzen Hudson.11
The Department otherwise received no
comments from interested parties
concerning the results of the CBP query.
However, CBP provided information
that contradicted Skyline’s claim of no
shipments during the POR. We intend to
follow-up with CBP concerning this
information subsequent to these
preliminary results and to allow Skyline
to comment on this discrepancy. For
these preliminary results, we
preliminarily determine that Skyline
had shipments of subject merchandise
Results and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Fifth
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
8338, 8342 (February 14, 2011), unchanged in
Administrative Review of Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
51940 (August 19, 2011); see also Administrative
Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 75 FR 49460, 49463 (August
13, 2010).
9 This is also consistent with the Department’s
decision in the first administrative review of the
Order. See Final Results of Aluminum Extrusions
AR1 at 79 FR at 99.
10 See letter from Gree, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: No Shipment
Certification’’ dated August 27, 2013; letter from
Jiuyuan, ‘‘Re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People’s Republic of China: No Shipment Letter,’’
dated August 24, 2013; letter from Shenzhen
Hudson, ‘‘Shenzhen Hudson No Shipment Letter
and Withdrawal of Review Request in the Second
Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order
on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated August 26, 2013; and,
letter from Skyline, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from
the People’s Republic of China: Certification of No
Sales, Shipments, or Entries and Quantity &Value
Questionnaire Response,’’ dated August 26, 2013.
11 See CBP Message Number, 4154301, dated
06/03/2014.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
during the POR, failed to submit an SRA
or SRC, and is thus part of the PRC-wide
entity.
Based on the certifications from Gree,
Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen Hudson, and our
analysis of CBP information, we
preliminarily determine that Gree,
Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen Hudson had no
shipments during the POR. In addition,
the Department finds that, consistent
with its assessment practice in NME
cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the
review in part in this circumstance, but
rather to complete the review with
respect to Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen
Hudson and issue appropriate
instructions to CBP based on the final
results of the review.12
PRC-Wide Entity
Jangho and Guang Ya Group/
Zhongya/Xinya,13 the companies that
the Department selected as mandatory
respondents in this administrative
review, failed to respond to the
Department’s requests for information or
declined to participate in this review.
These companies, therefore, are not
eligible for separate rate status.14
Additionally, 21 remaining companies
subject to these preliminary results are
not eligible for separate-rate status
because they did not submit separaterate applications or certifications, or
certifications of no shipments. As a
result, these 27 companies are under
review as part of the PRC-wide
entity.15 16
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Export and
constructed export prices have been
calculated in accordance with sections
772(a) and (b) of the Act. Because the
PRC is a NME within the meaning of
section 771(18) of the Act, the
Department calculated normal value in
accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary results, please see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
12 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the
‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below.
13 The following five companies are part of the
Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity for which
request for review has not been withdrawn: (1)
Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co. Ltd.; (2)
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited;
(3) Kong Ah International Company Limited; (4)
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and
(5) Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding
Limited.
14 See Initiation Notice, 78 FR at 38924–38925.
15 See Appendix IV.
16 See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36005
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of
the Act
Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act,
the Department preliminarily made an
adjustment for countervailable domestic
subsidies which have been found to
have impacted U.S. prices. For the nonexamined companies which are eligible
for a separate rate, as noted above, their
weighted-average dumping margin is
based on the weighted-average dumping
margin for non-examined, separate-rate
companies in the less-than-fair-value
investigation. This rate was based on the
average of the petition rates, which were
based on prices for sales of subject
merchandise to the United States. In the
companion CVD investigation and
companion CVD first administrative
review, the Department did not
individually examine certain PRC
exporters whose prices were the basis
for the petition rates. Therefore, those
companies were assigned the all-other
exporters rate as determined in the
amended final determination for the
CVD investigation, and a non-selected
company rate as determined in the final
results of the CVD first administrative
review.
Accordingly, in this review, for
exporters that did not receive a nonselected company rate in the companion
CVD first administrative review, the
adjustment to account for domestic
subsidies is based on the domestic
subsidy rates found for all-other
exporters in the CVD investigation. For
companies that received a non-selected
company rate in the companion CVD
first administrative review, the
adjustment to account for domestic
subsidies is based on the countervailing
duties found for the non-selected
companies in the first administrative
review. For Changzhou Changzheng
Evaporator Co., Ltd. (‘‘Changzheng
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
36006
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
Evaporator’’), which had its own
calculated rate in the CVD first
administrative review, the adjustment to
account for domestic subsidies is based
on the countervailing duties found for
Changzheng Evaporator in the CVD first
administrative review. The Department
found that the rate of these domestic
subsidies determined to have passed
through to U.S. prices is the product of
(1) the applicable CVD program rates
and (2) the documented ratio of costprice changes for the Chinese
manufacturing sector as a whole, which
is based on data available from
Bloomberg.17 Finally, for Kromet, no
such adjustment is necessary because
Kromet’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero in these preliminary
results.
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the
Act, the Department also made an
adjustment for countervailable export
subsidies. For Kromet, an adjustment
has been made to its reported U.S.
price.18 For the companies eligible for a
separate rate, an adjustment has been
made based on the countervailable
export subsidy found for all-other
exporters in the amended final
determination for the countervailing
duty investigation, if the company did
not participate in the first CVD
administrative review.19 For companies
that participated in the first CVD
administrative review, an adjustment
has been made based on the
countervailable export subsidy for the
non-selected companies from the final
results of the first administrative review
(or its own calculated rate, in the case
of Changzheng Evaporator).
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
POR:
Weighted-average
dumping margin 20
(percent)
Exporter
Kromet International, Inc .............................................................................................................................................................
Allied Maker Limited ....................................................................................................................................................................
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................
Classic & Contemporary Inc ........................................................................................................................................................
Dynabright Int’l Group (HK) Limited ............................................................................................................................................
Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................................
Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited 21 ...........................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................
Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................
Justhere Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................................................................
Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd 22 ...................................................................................................................................
Metaltek Group Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................................................
Midea International Trading Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................................................................
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited 23 ..........................................................................................................................................
Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................
Sincere Profit Limited ..................................................................................................................................................................
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................................
Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................................
PRC-wide Entity ...........................................................................................................................................................................
0.00
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
32.79
33.28
The Department intends to disclose to
the parties the calculations performed
for these preliminary results within five
days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Interested parties may
submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of these
preliminary results of review.24 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed no later than
five days after the case briefs are filed.25
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice.26 Hearing requests should
contain the following information: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
be limited to issues raised in the case
and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a
hearing is made, parties will be notified
of the time and date for the hearing to
be held at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.27
Unless otherwise extended, the
Department intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
17 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
Attachment 1.
18 See Prelim Analysis Memorandum.
19 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Notice of Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 77
FR 74466 (December 14, 2012).
20 For the Separate Rate Companies (i.e., all
companies other than Kromet), the Department
intends to adjust the weighted-average dumping
margin, for both cash deposit and liquidation
purposes, as explained above in the section
‘‘Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act.’’
See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
Attachment 2 for calculations showing the export
subsidy, domestic subsidy, pass-through rate, and
net adjustments.
21 Though the Department initiated a review for
‘‘Hoff Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point
Technology, Inc.) and Global Point Technology (Far
East) Limited (collectively, Global Point),’’ it is
apparent, from the company’s SRA, that Hoff
Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point
Technology, Inc.) is the U.S. importer, while Global
Point Technology (Far East) Limited is the exporter,
and thus the appropriate party to which to grant the
separate rate status.
22 Though the Department initiated a review for
both Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusions
Co., Ltd. and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn
Bhd, it is apparent from the company’s SRA, that
Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the
exporter and Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum
Extrusions Co., Ltd. is a producer only; thus, Kam
Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the
appropriate party to grant the separate rate status.
23 Though the Department initiated a review for
‘‘Permasteelisa South China Factory (Permasteelisa
China) and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited,’’ it is
apparent from the company’s SRA, that
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited is the exporter
and Permasteelisa South China Factory
(Permasteelisa China) is a producer only; thus
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited is the appropriate
party to grant the separate rate status.
24 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
25 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
26 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
27 See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, the Department will
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.28 The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after publication of the final results of
this review.
For each individually examined
respondent whose weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we
will calculate importer-specific ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales to the total entered value of those
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).29 For duty assessment
rates calculated on this basis, we will
direct CBP to assess the resulting ad
valorem rate against the entered
customs values for the subject
merchandise. If the weighted-average
dumping margin for the exporter is zero
or de minimis, or if the importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, then the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
On October 24, 2011, the Department
announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases.
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide rate.30
The final results of this review shall
be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
these preliminary results, the Department
applied the assessment rate calculation method
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
30 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011).
29 In
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements for estimated antidumping
duties, when imposed, will apply to all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) If the
companies preliminarily determined to
be eligible for a separate rate receive a
separate rate in the final results of this
administrative review, their cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review, as adjusted for domestic and
export subsidies (except, if that rate is
de minimis, then the cash deposit rate
will be zero); (2) for any previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporter that is not under review in
this segment of the proceeding but that
received a separate rate in the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the cash
deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity,
which will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin assigned to the
PRC-wide entity in the final results of
this administrative review; 31 and (4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
31 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 76 FR 18524 (April 4, 2011)
(‘‘Final Determination’’) and Order.
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing notice
of these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Respondent Selection
4. Scope of the Order
5. Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
6. Affiliation and Collapsing
7. Non-Market Economy Country
8. Separate Rates
9. Separate-Rate Recipients
10. Rate for Separate-Rate Recipients
11. The PRC-Wide Entity
12. Application of Facts Available
13. Application of Adverse Facts Available to
the PRC-Wide Entity
14. Selection of Adverse Facts Available Rate
15. Corroboration of Secondary Information
Used as AFA
16. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value
Data
17. Surrogate Country
18. Economic Comparability
19. Significant Producers of Identical or
Comparable Merchandise
20. Data Availability
21. Date of Sale
22. Comparisons to Normal Value
23. Determination of Comparison Method
24. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
25. Export Price and Constructed Export
Price
26. Value-Added Tax
27. Normal Value
28. Factor Valuations
29. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the
Act
30. Currency Conversion
31. Recommendation
Appendix II
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
PO 00000
36007
Separate-rate companies for which we are
rescinding this administrative review:
1. Exporter Changshu Changshen Aluminium
Products Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Changshu Changshen Aluminium
Products Co., Ltd.
2. Exporter Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd.,
for manufacturers Cosco (J.M.)
Aluminum Co., Ltd. or Jiangmen
Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
3. Exporter First Union Property Limited, for
manufacturer Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
4. Exporter Foshan Shanshui Fenglu
Aluminium Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium
Co., Ltd.
5. Exporter Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium
Co., Ltd., for manufacturer Guangdong
Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
36008
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6. Exporter Guangdong Weiye Aluminium
Factory Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory
Co., Ltd.
7. Exporter Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium
Co., Ltd., for manufacturer Guangdong
Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Hanwood Enterprises Limited, for
manufacturer Pingguo Aluminium
Company Limited
9. Exporter Honsense Development
Company, for manufacturer Kanal
Precision Aluminium Product Co., Ltd.
10. Exporter Innovative Aluminium (Hong
Kong) Limited, for manufacturer Taishan
Golden Gain Aluminium Products
Limited
11. Exporter Jiangyin Trust International Inc,
for manufacturer Jiangyin Xinhong Doors
and Windows Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter JMA (HK) Company Limited, for
manufacturers Guangdong Jianmei
Aluminum Profile Company Limited or
Foshan JMA Aluminium Company
Limited
13. Exporter Longkou Donghai Trade Co.,
Ltd., for manufacturer Shandong
Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
14. Exporter Ningbo Yili Import and Export
Co., Ltd., for manufacturer Zhejiang Anji
Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
15. Exporter North China Aluminum Co.,
Ltd., for manufacturer North China
Aluminum Co., Ltd.
16. Exporter PanAsia Aluminium (China)
Limited, for manufacturer PanAsia
Aluminium (China) Limited
17. Exporter Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co.,
Ltd., for manufacturer Pingguo Asia
Aluminum Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Popular Plastics Company
Limited, for manufacturer Hoi Tat Plastic
Mould & Metal Factory
19. Exporter Press Metal International Ltd.,
for manufacturer Press Metal
International Ltd.
20. Exporter Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan)
Co., Ltd., for manufacturer Tai-Ao
Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
21. Exporter Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat
Transmission Technology Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Tianjin Ruixin Electric
Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd.
22. Exporter USA Worldwide Door
Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd., for
manufacturers USA Worldwide Door
Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd. or
Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu)
Co.
23. Exporter Zhejiang Yongkang Listar
Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Zhejiang Yongkang Listar
Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.
24. Exporter Zhongshan Gold Mountain
Aluminium Factory Ltd., for
manufacturer Zhongshan Gold Mountain
Aluminium Factory Ltd.
Appendix III
Companies that are part of the PRC-wide
entity for which request for review has been
withdrawn:
1. Exporter Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Exporter Activa International Inc.
3. Exporter Bracalente Metal Products
(Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
4. Exporter Changshu Changshen Aluminium
Products Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than Changshu Changshen
Aluminium Products Co., Ltd.
5. Exporter Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts
Co., Ltd.
6. Exporter Clear Sky Inc.
7. Exporter Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd.,
for any manufacturers other than Cosco
(J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd. or Jiangmen
Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
9. Exporter Dragonluxe Limited
10. Exporter Dynamic Technologies China
11. Exporter First Union Property Limited,
for any manufacturer other than TopWok Metal Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou
New & Hi-Tech Industrial Development
Zone
13. Exporter Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia
Aluminum Alloy Co.
14. Exporter Foshan Guancheng Aluminum
Co., Ltd.
15. Exporter Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co.
Ltd.
16. Exporter Foshan JMA Aluminum
Company Limited
17. Exporter Foshan Shanshui Fenglu
Aluminium Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Foshan
Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Foshan Yong Li Jian Alu. Ltd.
19. Exporter Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum
Co., Ltd.
20. Exporter Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
21. Exporter Golden Dragon Precise Copper
Tube Group, Inc.
22. Exporter Gree Electric Appliances
23. Exporter Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium
Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer other
than Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium
Co., Ltd.
24. Exporter Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum
Profile Company Limited
25. Exporter Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs
Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
26. Exporter Guangdong Weiye Aluminium
Factory Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than Guangdong Weiye
Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd.
27. Exporter Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium
Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer other
than Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co.,
Ltd.
28. Exporter Hangzhou Zingyi Metal
Products Co., Ltd.
29. Exporter Hanwood Enterprises Limited,
for any manufacturer other than Pingguo
Aluminium Company Limited
30. Exporter Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
31. Exporter Hao Mei Aluminum
International Co., Ltd.
32. Exporter Honsense Development
Company, for any manufacturer other
than Kanal Precision Aluminium
Product Co., Ltd.
33. Exporter Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan
Co., Ltd.
34. Exporter Idex Health
35. Exporter Innovative Aluminium (Hong
Kong) Limited, for any manufacturer
other than Taishan Golden Gain
Aluminium Products Limited
36. Exporter iSource Asia
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37. Exporter Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware
Diecasting Co., Ltd.
38. Exporter Jiangyin Trust International Inc.,
for any manufacturer other than Jiangyin
Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
39. Exporter Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and
Windows Co., Ltd.
40. Exporter Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products
Co., Ltd.
41. Exporter JMA (HK) Company Limited, for
any manufacturers other than
Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile
Company Limited or Foshan JMA
Aluminium Company Limited
42. Exporter Kanal Precision Aluminum
Product Co., Ltd.
43. Exporter Karlton Aluminum Company
Ltd.
44. Exporter Kunshan Giant Light Metal
Technology Co., Ltd.
45. Exporter Liaoyang Zhongwang
Aluminum Profiled Co. Ltd.
46. Exporter Longkou Donghai Trade Co.,
Ltd., for any manufacturer other than
Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
47. Exporter Metaltek Metal Industry Co.,
Ltd.
48. Exporter Midea Air Conditioning
Equipment Co., Ltd.
49. Exporter Miland Luck Limited
50. Exporter Nanhai Textiles Import & Export
Co., Ltd. Of Guangdong
51. Exporter New Asia Aluminum & Stainless
Steel Product Co., Ltd.
52. Exporter Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte.
Ltd.
53. Exporter Ningbo Coaster International
Co., Ltd.
54. Exporter Ningbo HiTech Reliable
Manufacturing Company
55. Exporter Ningbo Yili Import and Export
Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer other
than Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum
Co., Ltd.
56. Exporter North China Aluminum Co.,
Ltd., for any manufacturer other than
North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
57. Exporter Northern States Metals
58. Exporter PanAsia Aluminium (China)
Limited, for any manufacturer other than
PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
59. Exporter Pingguo Aluminum Company
Limited
60. Exporter Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co.,
Ltd., for any manufacturer other than
Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
61. Exporter Popular Plastics Company
Limited, for any manufacturer other than
Hoi Tat Plastic Mould & Metal Factory
62. Exporter Press Metal International Ltd.,
for any manufacturer other than Press
Metal International Ltd.
63. Exporter Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
64. Exporter Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide
Machinery Co.
65. Exporter Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum
Co., Ltd.
66. Exporter Shanghai Canghai Aluminum
Tube Packaging Co., Ltd.
67. Exporter Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
68. Exporter Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp
Co., Ltd.
69. Exporter Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
70. Exporter Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum
Co., Ltd.
71. Exporter Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co.,
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Notices
Ltd.
72. Exporter Suzhou New Hongji Precision
Part Co.
73. Exporter Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan)
Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer other
than Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co.,
Ltd.
74. Exporter Taogoasei America Inc.
75. Exporter Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous
Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
76. Exporter Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat
Transmission Technology Co., Ltd., for
any manufacturer other than Tianjin
Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission
Technology Co., Ltd.
77. Exporter Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
78. Exporter Traffic Brick Network, LLC
79. Exporter USA Worldwide Door
Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturers other than USA
Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu)
Co., Ltd. or Worldwide Door
Components (Pinghu) Co.
80. Exporter Whirlpool Canada L.P.
81. Exporter Whirlpool Microwave Products
Development Ltd.
82. Exporter Xin Wei Aluminum Company
Limited
83. Exporter Xinya Aluminum & Stainless
Steel Product Co., Ltd.
84. Exporter Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum
Factory Company Ltd.
85. Exporter Zhaoqing China Square Industry
Limited
86. Exporter Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang
Aluminum Co., Ltd.
87. Exporter Zhejiang Yongkang Listar
Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Zhejiang
Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co.,
Ltd.
88. Exporter Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co.,
Ltd.
89. Exporter Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co.,
Ltd.
90. Exporter Zhongshan Gold Mountain
Aluminium Factory Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Zhongshan
Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd.
91. Exporter Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical
Equipment Co., Ltd.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix IV
Exporters for which a review was
requested that did not submit a no-shipments
certification or separate-rate certification/
application (including complete responses to
supplemental questionnaires) and are
preliminarily considered to be part of the
PRC-wide entity.
1. Exporter Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.
2. Exporter Chiping One Stop Industrial &
Trade Co., Ltd.
3. Exporter Cixi Handsome Pool Appliance
Co., Ltd.
4. Exporter DongChuan Swimming Pool
Equipments Co., Ltd.
5. Exporter Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware
Industrial Co., Ltd.
6. Exporter Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical
Appliances Co., Ltd.
7. Exporter Guang Dong Xin Wei Aluminum
Products Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Guang Ya Aluminum Industries
Co. Ltd.
9. Exporter Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Appliances Co., Ltd.
10. Exporter Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting
Hardware Products, Co., Ltd.
11. Exporter Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter Henan New Kelong Electrical
Appliances Co., Ltd.
13. Exporter Idex Dinglee Technology
(Tianjin Co., Ltd.)
14. Exporter Kong Ah International Company
Limited
15. Exporter Ningbo Splash Pool Appliance
Co., Ltd.
16. Exporter Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
17. Exporter Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum
Industry Engineering Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Skyline Exhibit Systems
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
19. Exporter Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing
Corporation
20. Exporter Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration &
Hardware
21. Exporter Whirlpool (Guangdong)
Exporters for which a review was
requested that submitted incomplete separate
rate documentation and are preliminarily
considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity.
22. Exporter Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum
Company Limited
23. Exporter Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall
System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho
Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
(collectively, Jangho)
24. Exporter Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang)
Corporation
25. Exporter Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing
Corporation
26. Exporter Zhongya Shaped Aluminum
(HK) Holding Limited
[FR Doc. 2014–14912 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–968]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
aluminum extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) is January 1, 2012,
through December 31, 2012. We
preliminary determine that the Alnan
Companies 1 and Jiangsu Changfa
AGENCY:
1 The Alnan Companies are Alnan Aluminum
Co., Ltd. (Alnan Aluminum), Alnan Aluminum Foil
Co., Ltd. (Alnan Foil), Alnan (Shanglin) Industry
Co., Ltd. (Shanglin Industry), and Shanglin Alnan
Aluminum Comprehensive Utilization Power Co.,
Ltd. (Shanglin Power). Kromet International Inc.,
one of the selected mandatory respondents in this
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36009
Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Changfa)
received countervailable subsidies
during the POR. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results of review.
DATES: Effective: June 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristen Johnson and Robert Copyak,
AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–4793 and (202) 482–2209,
respectively.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order 2 is aluminum extrusions which
are shapes and forms, produced by an
extrusion process, made from aluminum
alloys having metallic elements
corresponding to the alloy series
designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).3
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30,
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10,
7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70,
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10,
7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94,
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00,
7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00,
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50,
7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60,
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90,
7609.00.00.00, 8302.10.30.00,
8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00,
8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15,
8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10,
8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45,
8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00,
8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45,
administrative review, reported that it is a Canadabased company that sold subject merchandise
produced by the Alnan Companies to the United
States during the review period.
2 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76
FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order).
3 For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see accompanying Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China, dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36003-36009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14912]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission, in Part; 2012/2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum
extrusions from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ The period
of review (``POR'') is May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. The review
covers the following exporters of subject merchandise: mandatory
respondents Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd.
and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively ``Jangho''), and
the single entity comprised of Guang Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd.
(``Guang Ya''), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Guangcheng''),
Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (``Kong Ah''), and Guang Ya Aluminum
Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (``Guang Ya HK'') (collectively ``Guang Ya
Group''); Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Zhongya''), Zhongya
Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (``Shaped Aluminum''), and Karlton
Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Karlton'') (collectively ``Zhongya''), and Foshan
Nanhai Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (``Xinya'')
(collectively ``Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya''); and Kromet
International, Inc. (``Kromet''), a voluntary respondent. The
Department preliminarily finds that Kromet did not make sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal value. In addition, the
Department preliminarily determines that Jangho and Guang Ya Group/
Zhongya/Xinya failed to demonstrate that they were eligible for
separate-rate status and thus have been included in the PRC-wide
entity. We also preliminarily determine that three companies, Hong Kong
Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited (``Gree''), Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
(``Jiuyuan''), and Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co., Ltd.
(``Shenzhen Hudson'') had no shipments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department initiated this review on June 28, 2013. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June 28,
2013) (``Initiation Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective: June 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz or Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474 or (202) 482-4243,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order \2\ is aluminum extrusions
which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (``Order'').
\3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary
Decision Memorandum'') for a complete description of the scope of
the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS''): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71,
7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90,
7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20,
9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10,
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30,
7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00,
8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80,
8503.00.95.20, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90,
[[Page 36004]]
9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85,
9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10,
9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80,
9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05,
9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15,
9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51,
9403.90.80.61, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40,
9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30,
9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00,
9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00,
9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00,
9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as
under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60.
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is
dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice for which all
review requests have been timely withdrawn and which were eligible for
separate rate status at the initiation of this review, we are
rescinding this administrative review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). These companies are listed at Appendix II to this
notice. For these companies, antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the rates of the cash deposits for estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2).
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice for which all
review requests have been withdrawn, but which were not eligible for
separate-rate status at the initiation of this review, the Department's
practice is to refrain from rescinding the review with respect to these
companies at this time. While the requests for review of these
companies were timely withdrawn, the companies remain part of the PRC-
wide entity. These companies are listed at Appendix III to this notice.
The PRC-wide entity is under review for these preliminary results.
Thus, we are not rescinding this review with respect to these
companies, but the Department will make a determination with respect to
the PRC-wide entity at the conclusion of this review.
Separate Rates
In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties of the opportunity to
request a separate rate. In proceedings involving non-market economy
(``NME'') countries, the Department begins with a rebuttable
presumption that all companies within the NME country are subject to
government control and, thus, should be assigned a single weighted-
average dumping margin. It is the Department's policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review involving
an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that
it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate.
Companies that wanted to be considered for a separate rate in this
review were required to timely file a separate-rate application
(``SRA'') or a separate-rate certification to demonstrate their
eligibility for a separate rate. Separate-rate applications and
separate-rate certifications were due to the Department within 60
calendar days of the publication of the Initiation Notice.
In this review, 21 exporters for which a review was requested did
not submit separate-rate information to rebut the presumption that,
like all companies within the PRC, they are subject to government
control.\4\ These companies are listed at Appendix IV to this notice.
As further discussed in the Preliminarily Decision Memorandum, we
determine that these entities have not demonstrated that they operate
free from government control. Thus, we preliminary determine that they
are part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ One company, Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``New
Zhongya''), was determined to have been succeeded by Guangdong
Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited (``Guangdong Zhongya'') in a
changed circumstances review. See Aluminum Extrusions From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, 77 FR 54900 (September 6, 2012). Thus, despite the fact that
a review was initiated of New Zhongya, it is not being included in
this list of companies because its successor in interest, Guangdong
Zhongya, is part of the Guang Ya/Zhongya/Xinya single entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An additional five companies under review submitted SRAs, but, as
further discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we
preliminarily determine not to grant these companies a separate
rate.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ These five companies are: (1) Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum
Company Limited; (2) Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
(collectively, Jangho); (3) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) Corporation; (4)
Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (5) Zhongya Shaped
Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nineteen separate-rate applicants still under review submitted SRAs
and responses to supplemental questionnaires which provide sufficient
information to preliminarily determine that they are entitled to a
separate rate. A full discussion of the basis for granting these
companies a separate rate can be found in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate
The Department intends to assign to non-examined, separate-rate
companies the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to non-examined,
separate-rate companies in the final determination of the antidumping
investigation.\6\ Neither the Act nor the Department's regulations
address the establishment of the rate applied to individual companies
not selected for examination where the Department limited its
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)
of the Act. The Department's practice in cases involving limited
selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volumes of
trade has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance,
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department
to avoid calculating an all-others rate using any rates that are zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. The
Department's regulations further state that in calculating the all-
others rate under section 735(c)(5) of the Act, the Department will
exclude estimated weighted-average dumping margin rates calculated for
voluntary respondents.\7\ Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides
that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available, the Department may use ``any reasonable method'' for
assigning a rate to non-examined respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission, in Part, 2010/12, 79 FR 96, 99 (January 2, 2014)
(``Final Results of Aluminum Extrusions AR1'').
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.204(d)(3). See also Antidumping Duties;
Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296, 27310 (May 19, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We preliminarily determine that the application of the rate from
the investigation to the non-examined separate-rate respondents is
consistent with precedent \8\ and the most
[[Page 36005]]
appropriate method to determine the separate rate in the instant
review.\9\ Pursuant to this method, we are assigning the margin of
32.79 percent, the most recent margin (from the less-than-fair-value
investigation) calculated for the non-examined separate-rate
respondents, to the non-examined separate-rate respondents in the
instant review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Partial
Rescission of Fifth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
8338, 8342 (February 14, 2011), unchanged in Administrative Review
of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 51940 (August 19, 2011); see also
Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 49460, 49463 (August
13, 2010).
\9\ This is also consistent with the Department's decision in
the first administrative review of the Order. See Final Results of
Aluminum Extrusions AR1 at 79 FR at 99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Four companies submitted timely certifications indicating that they
had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the
POR.\10\ Consistent with its practice, the Department asked U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to conduct a query on potential
shipments made by Gree, Jiuyuan, Shenzhen Hudson and Skyline Exhibit
Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (``Skyline'') during the POR; CBP provided
no evidence that contradicted the claims of no shipments submitted by
Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzen Hudson.\11\ The Department otherwise
received no comments from interested parties concerning the results of
the CBP query. However, CBP provided information that contradicted
Skyline's claim of no shipments during the POR. We intend to follow-up
with CBP concerning this information subsequent to these preliminary
results and to allow Skyline to comment on this discrepancy. For these
preliminary results, we preliminarily determine that Skyline had
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, failed to submit an
SRA or SRC, and is thus part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See letter from Gree, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: No Shipment Certification'' dated August
27, 2013; letter from Jiuyuan, ``Re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: No Shipment Letter,'' dated August 24,
2013; letter from Shenzhen Hudson, ``Shenzhen Hudson No Shipment
Letter and Withdrawal of Review Request in the Second Administrative
Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China,'' dated August 26, 2013; and, letter
from Skyline, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of
China: Certification of No Sales, Shipments, or Entries and Quantity
&Value Questionnaire Response,'' dated August 26, 2013.
\11\ See CBP Message Number, 4154301, dated 06/03/2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the certifications from Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen
Hudson, and our analysis of CBP information, we preliminarily determine
that Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen Hudson had no shipments during the
POR. In addition, the Department finds that, consistent with its
assessment practice in NME cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the
review in part in this circumstance, but rather to complete the review
with respect to Gree, Jiuyuan, and Shenzhen Hudson and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the
review.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) and
the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity
Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya,\13\ the companies that the
Department selected as mandatory respondents in this administrative
review, failed to respond to the Department's requests for information
or declined to participate in this review. These companies, therefore,
are not eligible for separate rate status.\14\ Additionally, 21
remaining companies subject to these preliminary results are not
eligible for separate-rate status because they did not submit separate-
rate applications or certifications, or certifications of no shipments.
As a result, these 27 companies are under review as part of the PRC-
wide entity.15 16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The following five companies are part of the Guang Ya
Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity for which request for review has not been
withdrawn: (1) Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co. Ltd.; (2) Guangdong
Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited; (3) Kong Ah International Company
Limited; (4) Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and (5)
Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited.
\14\ See Initiation Notice, 78 FR at 38924-38925.
\15\ See Appendix IV.
\16\ See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Export and constructed export prices have been
calculated in accordance with sections 772(a) and (b) of the Act.
Because the PRC is a NME within the meaning of section 771(18) of the
Act, the Department calculated normal value in accordance with section
773(c) of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
preliminary results, please see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
internet at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, the Department
preliminarily made an adjustment for countervailable domestic subsidies
which have been found to have impacted U.S. prices. For the non-
examined companies which are eligible for a separate rate, as noted
above, their weighted-average dumping margin is based on the weighted-
average dumping margin for non-examined, separate-rate companies in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. This rate was based on the average
of the petition rates, which were based on prices for sales of subject
merchandise to the United States. In the companion CVD investigation
and companion CVD first administrative review, the Department did not
individually examine certain PRC exporters whose prices were the basis
for the petition rates. Therefore, those companies were assigned the
all-other exporters rate as determined in the amended final
determination for the CVD investigation, and a non-selected company
rate as determined in the final results of the CVD first administrative
review.
Accordingly, in this review, for exporters that did not receive a
non-selected company rate in the companion CVD first administrative
review, the adjustment to account for domestic subsidies is based on
the domestic subsidy rates found for all-other exporters in the CVD
investigation. For companies that received a non-selected company rate
in the companion CVD first administrative review, the adjustment to
account for domestic subsidies is based on the countervailing duties
found for the non-selected companies in the first administrative
review. For Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd. (``Changzheng
[[Page 36006]]
Evaporator''), which had its own calculated rate in the CVD first
administrative review, the adjustment to account for domestic subsidies
is based on the countervailing duties found for Changzheng Evaporator
in the CVD first administrative review. The Department found that the
rate of these domestic subsidies determined to have passed through to
U.S. prices is the product of (1) the applicable CVD program rates and
(2) the documented ratio of cost-price changes for the Chinese
manufacturing sector as a whole, which is based on data available from
Bloomberg.\17\ Finally, for Kromet, no such adjustment is necessary
because Kromet's weighted-average dumping margin is zero in these
preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Attachment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, the Department also
made an adjustment for countervailable export subsidies. For Kromet, an
adjustment has been made to its reported U.S. price.\18\ For the
companies eligible for a separate rate, an adjustment has been made
based on the countervailable export subsidy found for all-other
exporters in the amended final determination for the countervailing
duty investigation, if the company did not participate in the first CVD
administrative review.\19\ For companies that participated in the first
CVD administrative review, an adjustment has been made based on the
countervailable export subsidy for the non-selected companies from the
final results of the first administrative review (or its own calculated
rate, in the case of Changzheng Evaporator).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Prelim Analysis Memorandum.
\19\ See Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Notice of Amended
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 77 FR 74466
(December 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
\20\ (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kromet International, Inc........................... 0.00
Allied Maker Limited................................ 32.79
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd............ 32.79
Classic & Contemporary Inc.......................... 32.79
Dynabright Int'l Group (HK) Limited................. 32.79
Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd..................... 32.79
Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited \21\..... 32.79
Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd.............. 32.79
Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd............ 32.79
Justhere Co., Ltd................................... 32.79
Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd \22\............. 32.79
Metaltek Group Co., Ltd............................. 32.79
Midea International Trading Co., Ltd................ 32.79
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited \23\................ 32.79
Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy 32.79
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.............................
Sincere Profit Limited.............................. 32.79
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd....................... 32.79
Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd........... 32.79
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd...................... 32.79
PRC-wide Entity..................................... 33.28
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\24\
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than five days after the case briefs are filed.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ For the Separate Rate Companies (i.e., all companies other
than Kromet), the Department intends to adjust the weighted-average
dumping margin, for both cash deposit and liquidation purposes, as
explained above in the section ``Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of
the Act.'' See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Attachment 2 for
calculations showing the export subsidy, domestic subsidy, pass-
through rate, and net adjustments.
\21\ Though the Department initiated a review for ``Hoff
Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point Technology, Inc.) and
Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited (collectively, Global
Point),'' it is apparent, from the company's SRA, that Hoff
Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point Technology, Inc.) is the
U.S. importer, while Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited is
the exporter, and thus the appropriate party to which to grant the
separate rate status.
\22\ Though the Department initiated a review for both Taishan
City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusions Co., Ltd. and Kam Kiu Aluminium
Products Sdn Bhd, it is apparent from the company's SRA, that Kam
Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the exporter and Taishan City Kam
Kiu Aluminum Extrusions Co., Ltd. is a producer only; thus, Kam Kiu
Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the appropriate party to grant the
separate rate status.
\23\ Though the Department initiated a review for
``Permasteelisa South China Factory (Permasteelisa China) and
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited,'' it is apparent from the company's
SRA, that Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited is the exporter and
Permasteelisa South China Factory (Permasteelisa China) is a
producer only; thus Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited is the
appropriate party to grant the separate rate status.
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\25\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice.\26\ Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\27\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative review, which will include the
results of its analysis of issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results,
[[Page 36007]]
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department
will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review.\28\ The Department intends
to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each individually examined respondent whose weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates
based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\29\ For duty assessment
rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the
resulting ad valorem rate against the entered customs values for the
subject merchandise. If the weighted-average dumping margin for the
exporter is zero or de minimis, or if the importer-specific assessment
rate is zero or de minimis, then the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in
practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies individually examined during this
review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an
exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any
suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e.,
at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping
duties, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication of the final results of this administrative
review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) If the
companies preliminarily determined to be eligible for a separate rate
receive a separate rate in the final results of this administrative
review, their cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final results of this review, as
adjusted for domestic and export subsidies (except, if that rate is de
minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for any
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporter that is
not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that received a
separate rate in the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be equal to the cash deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity, which
will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the
PRC-wide entity in the final results of this administrative review;
\31\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain
in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of
China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76 FR
18524 (April 4, 2011) (``Final Determination'') and Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing notice of these results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Respondent Selection
4. Scope of the Order
5. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
6. Affiliation and Collapsing
7. Non-Market Economy Country
8. Separate Rates
9. Separate-Rate Recipients
10. Rate for Separate-Rate Recipients
11. The PRC-Wide Entity
12. Application of Facts Available
13. Application of Adverse Facts Available to the PRC-Wide Entity
14. Selection of Adverse Facts Available Rate
15. Corroboration of Secondary Information Used as AFA
16. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data
17. Surrogate Country
18. Economic Comparability
19. Significant Producers of Identical or Comparable Merchandise
20. Data Availability
21. Date of Sale
22. Comparisons to Normal Value
23. Determination of Comparison Method
24. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
25. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
26. Value-Added Tax
27. Normal Value
28. Factor Valuations
29. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
30. Currency Conversion
31. Recommendation
Appendix II
Separate-rate companies for which we are rescinding this
administrative review:
1. Exporter Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd.
2. Exporter Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd., for manufacturers
Cosco (J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd. or Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware
Diecasting Co., Ltd.
3. Exporter First Union Property Limited, for manufacturer Top-Wok
Metal Co., Ltd.
4. Exporter Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd.
5. Exporter Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
[[Page 36008]]
6. Exporter Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd.
7. Exporter Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Hanwood Enterprises Limited, for manufacturer Pingguo
Aluminium Company Limited
9. Exporter Honsense Development Company, for manufacturer Kanal
Precision Aluminium Product Co., Ltd.
10. Exporter Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited, for
manufacturer Taishan Golden Gain Aluminium Products Limited
11. Exporter Jiangyin Trust International Inc, for manufacturer
Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter JMA (HK) Company Limited, for manufacturers Guangdong
Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited or Foshan JMA Aluminium
Company Limited
13. Exporter Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
14. Exporter Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd., for
manufacturer Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
15. Exporter North China Aluminum Co., Ltd., for manufacturer North
China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
16. Exporter PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited, for manufacturer
PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
17. Exporter Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Popular Plastics Company Limited, for manufacturer Hoi
Tat Plastic Mould & Metal Factory
19. Exporter Press Metal International Ltd., for manufacturer Press
Metal International Ltd.
20. Exporter Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd., for manufacturer
Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
21. Exporter Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology
Co., Ltd., for manufacturer Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat
Transmission Technology Co., Ltd.
22. Exporter USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd., for
manufacturers USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd. or
Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co.
23. Exporter Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.,
for manufacturer Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co.,
Ltd.
24. Exporter Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd., for
manufacturer Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd.
Appendix III
Companies that are part of the PRC-wide entity for which request
for review has been withdrawn:
1. Exporter Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Exporter Activa International Inc.
3. Exporter Bracalente Metal Products (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
4. Exporter Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co.,
Ltd.
5. Exporter Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
6. Exporter Clear Sky Inc.
7. Exporter Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd., for any manufacturers
other than Cosco (J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd. or Jiangmen Qunxing
Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.
9. Exporter Dragonluxe Limited
10. Exporter Dynamic Technologies China
11. Exporter First Union Property Limited, for any manufacturer
other than Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & Hi-Tech Industrial
Development Zone
13. Exporter Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co.
14. Exporter Foshan Guancheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.
15. Exporter Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
16. Exporter Foshan JMA Aluminum Company Limited
17. Exporter Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Foshan Yong Li Jian Alu. Ltd.
19. Exporter Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
20. Exporter Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
21. Exporter Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.
22. Exporter Gree Electric Appliances
23. Exporter Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
24. Exporter Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited
25. Exporter Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
26. Exporter Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd.
27. Exporter Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
28. Exporter Hangzhou Zingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd.
29. Exporter Hanwood Enterprises Limited, for any manufacturer other
than Pingguo Aluminium Company Limited
30. Exporter Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
31. Exporter Hao Mei Aluminum International Co., Ltd.
32. Exporter Honsense Development Company, for any manufacturer
other than Kanal Precision Aluminium Product Co., Ltd.
33. Exporter Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd.
34. Exporter Idex Health
35. Exporter Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited, for any
manufacturer other than Taishan Golden Gain Aluminium Products
Limited
36. Exporter iSource Asia
37. Exporter Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
38. Exporter Jiangyin Trust International Inc., for any manufacturer
other than Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
39. Exporter Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
40. Exporter Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.
41. Exporter JMA (HK) Company Limited, for any manufacturers other
than Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited or Foshan
JMA Aluminium Company Limited
42. Exporter Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd.
43. Exporter Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
44. Exporter Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.
45. Exporter Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profiled Co. Ltd.
46. Exporter Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
47. Exporter Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
48. Exporter Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.
49. Exporter Miland Luck Limited
50. Exporter Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd. Of Guangdong
51. Exporter New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
52. Exporter Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.
53. Exporter Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.
54. Exporter Ningbo HiTech Reliable Manufacturing Company
55. Exporter Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
56. Exporter North China Aluminum Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
57. Exporter Northern States Metals
58. Exporter PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited, for any manufacturer
other than PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
59. Exporter Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
60. Exporter Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
61. Exporter Popular Plastics Company Limited, for any manufacturer
other than Hoi Tat Plastic Mould & Metal Factory
62. Exporter Press Metal International Ltd., for any manufacturer
other than Press Metal International Ltd.
63. Exporter Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
64. Exporter Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.
65. Exporter Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
66. Exporter Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube Packaging Co., Ltd.
67. Exporter Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
68. Exporter Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
69. Exporter Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
70. Exporter Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.
71. Exporter Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co.,
[[Page 36009]]
Ltd.
72. Exporter Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.
73. Exporter Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
74. Exporter Taogoasei America Inc.
75. Exporter Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
76. Exporter Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology
Co., Ltd., for any manufacturer other than Tianjin Ruixin Electric
Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd.
77. Exporter Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
78. Exporter Traffic Brick Network, LLC
79. Exporter USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd., for
any manufacturers other than USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu)
Co., Ltd. or Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co.
80. Exporter Whirlpool Canada L.P.
81. Exporter Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd.
82. Exporter Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited
83. Exporter Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
84. Exporter Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd.
85. Exporter Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited
86. Exporter Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
87. Exporter Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.,
for any manufacturer other than Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum
Industry Co., Ltd.
88. Exporter Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.
89. Exporter Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd.
90. Exporter Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd., for any
manufacturer other than Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory
Ltd.
91. Exporter Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Appendix IV
Exporters for which a review was requested that did not submit a
no-shipments certification or separate-rate certification/
application (including complete responses to supplemental
questionnaires) and are preliminarily considered to be part of the
PRC-wide entity.
1. Exporter Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.
2. Exporter Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.
3. Exporter Cixi Handsome Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.
4. Exporter DongChuan Swimming Pool Equipments Co., Ltd.
5. Exporter Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.
6. Exporter Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
7. Exporter Guang Dong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
8. Exporter Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co. Ltd.
9. Exporter Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
10. Exporter Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products, Co.,
Ltd.
11. Exporter Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.
12. Exporter Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
13. Exporter Idex Dinglee Technology (Tianjin Co., Ltd.)
14. Exporter Kong Ah International Company Limited
15. Exporter Ningbo Splash Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.
16. Exporter Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
17. Exporter Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd.
18. Exporter Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
19. Exporter Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation
20. Exporter Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware
21. Exporter Whirlpool (Guangdong)
Exporters for which a review was requested that submitted
incomplete separate rate documentation and are preliminarily
considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity.
22. Exporter Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited
23. Exporter Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co.,
Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively, Jangho)
24. Exporter Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) Corporation
25. Exporter Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation
26. Exporter Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited
[FR Doc. 2014-14912 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
