Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 35310-35312 [2014-14481]

Download as PDF 35310 Notices Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 119 Friday, June 20, 2014 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Wenatchee-Okanogan Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. Notice of Meetings. AGENCY: ACTION: The Wenatchee-Okanogan Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Wenatchee, Washington. The committee is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110– 343) (the Act) and operates in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the committee is to improve collaborative relationships and to provide advice and recommendations to the Forest Service concerning projects and funding consistent with the Title II of the Act. These meetings are open to the public. The purpose of these meetings is to review projects proposed for RAC consideration under Title II of the Act. DATES: The meetings will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on the following dates: • July 22, 2014. • July 23, 2014 All RAC meetings are subject to cancellation. For status of meetings prior to attendance, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (NF) Headquarters Office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington. Written comments may be submitted as described under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received at OkanoganWenatchee NF Headquarters Office. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:31 Jun 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 Please call ahead to facilitate entry into the building. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin DeMario, RAC Coordinator, by phone at 509–664–9292 or via email at rdemario@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional RAC information, including the meeting agenda and the meeting summary/minutes can be found at the following Web site: https:// facadatabase.gov/committee/ committee.aspx?cid=2274&aid=171. The agenda will include time for people to make oral statements of three minutes or less. Individuals wishing to make an oral statement should request in writing by July 3, 2014 to be scheduled on the agenda. Anyone who would like to bring related matters to the attention of the committee may file written statements with the committee staff before or after the meeting. Written comments and requests for time for oral comments must be sent to Robin DeMario, RAC Coordinator, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington, 98801; by email to rdemario@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to 509–664–9286. Meeting Accommodations: If you are a person requiring reasonable accommodation, please make requests in advance for sign language interpreting, assistive listening devices or other reasonable accommodation for access to the facility or proceedings by contacting the person listed in the section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All reasonable accommodation requests are managed on a case by case basis. [FR Doc. 2014–14448 Filed 6–19–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–18–2014] Foreign-Trade Zone 247—Erie, Pennsylvania; Authorization of Limited Production Activity; GE Transportation (Locomotives, Off-Highway Vehicles and Motors/Engines); Lawrence Park and Grove City, Pennsylvania On February 14, 2014, GE Transportation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for its facilities within Subzones 247A and 247B, in Lawrence Park and Grove City, Pennsylvania. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 10765–10768, 2–26–2014). The FTZ Board has determined that further review of part of the proposed activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized on a limited basis, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14, and further subject to a restriction requiring that diesel engine units (HTSUS 8502.11) be admitted to the subzones in privileged foreign status. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–14385 Filed 6–19–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–896] Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2014. SUMMARY: On April 1, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium AGENCY: Dated: June 13, 2014. Michael L. Balboni, Forest Supervisor. PO 00000 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 2014 / Notices metal from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013.1 This review covers one PRC company, Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’). The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results, but we received no comments. Hence, these final results are unchanged from the Preliminary Results, and we continue to find that TMI did not have reviewable entries during the period of review (‘‘POR’’). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Erin Begnal, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482– 1442, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 1, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the instant review.2 TMI submitted a timely-filed certification indicating that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.3 In addition, in response to the Department’s query, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) did not provide any evidence that contradicted TMI’s claim of no shipments.4 The Department received no comments from interested parties concerning the results of the CBP query. Therefore, based on TMI’s certification and our analysis of CBP information, we preliminarily determined that TMI did not have any reviewable entries during the POR.5 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.6 We received no comments from interested parties. The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). Scope of the Order The product covered by this antidumping duty order is magnesium metal from the PRC, which includes mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 1 See Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 79 FR 18277 (April 1, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 Id. 3 See letter from TMI, ‘‘Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–896; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd.’’ dated July 23, 2012 {sic}. 4 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 18278. 5 Id. 6 Id. VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:31 Jun 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 primary and secondary alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The magnesium covered by this order includes blends of primary and secondary magnesium. The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the United States as conforming to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy’’ 7 and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping orders on magnesium from the PRC (generally referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). The scope of this order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium, including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy’’ 8; (2) magnesium that is in liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, 7 The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. 8 The material is already covered by existing antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001). PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35311 graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.9 The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under items 8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS items are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments As explained above, in the Preliminary Results, the Department found that TMI did not have reviewable entries during the POR.10 Also in the Preliminary Results, the Department stated that consistent with its recently announced refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the review in part in this circumstance but, rather, to complete the review with respect to TMI and to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.11 After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department received no comments from interested parties, nor has it received any information that would cause it to revisit its preliminary determination. Therefore, for these final results, the Department continues to find that TMI did not have any reviewable entries during the POR. Assessment Rates The Department determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.12 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the 9 This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 (September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot. 10 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 18278. 11 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘Assessment Practice Refinement’’) and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 12 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1 35312 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 2014 / Notices date of publication of these final results of review. Additionally, consistent with the Department’s refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, because the Department determined that TMI had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, any suspended entries that entered under TMI’s antidumping duty case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.13 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice of final results of the administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to TMI in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent; 14 and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. 13 See Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR 65694. 14 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005). VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:31 Jun 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 16, 2014. Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. [FR Doc. 2014–14481 Filed 6–19–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–804, A–412–801] Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Review in Part; 2009– 2010 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 21, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom.1 On March 25, 2014, the Department issued its postpreliminary analysis in these reviews. For these final results, we continue to find that sales of the subject merchandise have not been made at prices below normal value. DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., AGENCY: 1 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative and Changed-Circumstances Reviews, 76 FR 22372 (April 21, 2011) (Preliminary Results). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 21, 2011, the Department published, and invited interested parties to comment on, the Preliminary Results.2 The period of reviews is May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We received case and rebuttal briefs from various parties to these reviews. On July 15, 2011, the Department discontinued these reviews.3 The Department resumed these reviews effective November 29, 2013, pursuant to court judgment.4 On March 25, 2014, we issued a post-preliminary analysis in which we (1) addressed the methodology stated in the Final Modification for Reviews 5 as it pertained to these administrative reviews and (2) stated our intent to rescind the review in part with respect to the administrative review of ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan.6 We invited comments from interested parties for the Post-Preliminary Analysis.7 We received additional case and rebuttal briefs from interested parties commenting on the PostPreliminary Analysis. The Department conducted these administrative reviews in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Orders The products covered by the orders are ball bearings and parts thereof. Imports of these products are classified under the following Harmonized Tariff 2 Id. 3 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 76 FR 41761 (July 15, 2011). 4 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice of Reinstatement of Antidumping Duty Orders, Resumption of Administrative Reviews, and Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 78 FR 76104 (December 16, 2013). 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8113 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews), in which the Department stated that the methodology described therein ‘‘will also be applicable to any reviews currently discontinued by the Department if such reviews are continued after April 16, 2012 by reason of a final and conclusive judgment of a U.S. Court.’’ See also 19 CFR 351.414. 6 See the memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled ‘‘Administrative Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom for the 2009–2010 Period: Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum and Intent to Rescind a Review in Part’’ dated March 25, 2014 (PostPreliminary Analysis). 7 Id. E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35310-35312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-896]


Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2014.

SUMMARY: On April 1, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary results 
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium

[[Page 35311]]

metal from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period 
April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013.\1\ This review covers one PRC 
company, Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (``TMI''). The 
Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the 
Preliminary Results, but we received no comments. Hence, these final 
results are unchanged from the Preliminary Results, and we continue to 
find that TMI did not have reviewable entries during the period of 
review (``POR'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013, 79 FR 18277 (April 1, 2014) (``Preliminary Results'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Erin Begnal, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4243 or (202) 482-1442, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 1, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of the instant review.\2\ TMI submitted a timely-filed certification 
indicating that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the 
United States during the POR.\3\ In addition, in response to the 
Department's query, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') did 
not provide any evidence that contradicted TMI's claim of no 
shipments.\4\ The Department received no comments from interested 
parties concerning the results of the CBP query. Therefore, based on 
TMI's certification and our analysis of CBP information, we 
preliminarily determined that TMI did not have any reviewable entries 
during the POR.\5\ We invited interested parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Results.\6\ We received no comments from interested 
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id.
    \3\ See letter from TMI, ``Magnesium Metal from the People's 
Republic of China; A-570-896; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin 
Magnesium International, Co., Ltd.'' dated July 23, 2012 
{sic{time} .
    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 18278.
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this antidumping duty order is magnesium 
metal from the PRC, which includes primary and secondary alloy 
magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, 
shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight 
primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by 
decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is 
produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The 
magnesium covered by this order includes blends of primary and 
secondary magnesium.
    The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium 
metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including, 
without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, 
and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into 
rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other 
shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 
99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the 
United States as conforming to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium 
Alloy'' \7\ and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping 
orders on magnesium from the PRC (generally referred to as ``alloy'' 
magnesium).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the 
American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for 
ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The scope of this order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium, 
including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in 
which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less 
than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ``ASTM 
Specification for Magnesium Alloy'' \8\; (2) magnesium that is in 
liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less 
magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of 
certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based 
reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, 
calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, 
nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda 
ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/
mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, 
ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The material is already covered by existing antidumping 
orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from 
the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; 
Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the 
Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty 
Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People's Republic of 
China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001).
    \9\ This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is 
based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000-2001 
investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium 
in Granular Form From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 
(September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); 
Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure 
Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 
2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not 
combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under items 
8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS items are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
merchandise is dispositive.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    As explained above, in the Preliminary Results, the Department 
found that TMI did not have reviewable entries during the POR.\10\ Also 
in the Preliminary Results, the Department stated that consistent with 
its recently announced refinement to its assessment practice in non-
market economy (``NME'') cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the 
review in part in this circumstance but, rather, to complete the review 
with respect to TMI and to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based 
on the final results of the review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 18278.
    \11\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (``Assessment 
Practice Refinement'') and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department received no 
comments from interested parties, nor has it received any information 
that would cause it to revisit its preliminary determination. 
Therefore, for these final results, the Department continues to find 
that TMI did not have any reviewable entries during the POR.

Assessment Rates

    The Department determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 
the final results of this review.\12\ The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the

[[Page 35312]]

date of publication of these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, consistent with the Department's refinement to its 
assessment practice in NME cases, because the Department determined 
that TMI had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, any 
suspended entries that entered under TMI's antidumping duty case number 
(i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide 
rate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR 65694.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice of 
final results of the administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no shipments, the 
cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to TMI 
in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are 
not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have 
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide 
rate of 141.49 percent; \14\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that 
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal From 
the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: June 16, 2014.
Lynn Fischer Fox,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
[FR Doc. 2014-14481 Filed 6-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P