Certain Omega-3 Extracts From Marine or Aquatic Biomass and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion to Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement and License Agreement; Termination of the Investigation, 34549-34550 [2014-14147]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices Service Manual. The purpose of this policy is to establish policy for accepting, using, and recognizing donations. The policy includes procedures for reviewing and evaluating potential donors and donations, as well as guidance on soliciting donations and fundraising. Background The Department of the Interior issued ‘‘ETHICS AND CONDUCT, Employee Responsibilities and Conduct, Donations’’ (374 DM 6) in 2007. This guidance requires all Interior bureaus to develop their own policy on donations. Several authorities allow various types of donations, including real and personal property, services, and money. These include the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), which allows acceptance of funds or lands, pending State approval. A later amendment to the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742f) allows the Service to accept real and personal property donations. Other authorities cited in this donations policy include the Partnerships for Wildlife Act (16 U.S.C. 3741); Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101); Migratory Bird Conservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 715–715r); National Wildlife Refuge System Volunteer and Community Partnership Enhancement Act of 1998, as amended (16 U.S.C. 742f); Great Lakes Fisheries Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 932); and the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd(b)(2)). In addition to those broader authorities, individual units of the National Wildlife Refuge System or the National Fish Hatchery System may have specific legislative authority to accept donations. This donations policy is in keeping with statutory requirements as well as with the aforementioned Departmental guidance, 374 DM 6. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Final Policy We recognize the value of donations, but also the potential problems with accepting them. This policy covers the ethical considerations for donations, fundraising, and solicitation. While donations can be a means to further our mission, not all donations are appropriate. This policy provides consistent procedures for evaluating potential donors and donations to determine if acceptance is appropriate. The policy also helps the reader determine who has authority to accept appropriate donations. That authority depends on the type (real property or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:43 Jun 16, 2014 Jkt 232001 non-real property) and the monetary value of the donation. This policy also covers soliciting donations and fundraising. Those activities are primarily done by Friends groups, which are groups of volunteers who support specific refuges. The donations policy lists the limited circumstances when Service employees may solicit donations. It describes inappropriate fundraising activities and also mentions grant applications and acceptance. Recognizing donors is very important. This policy also contains information on that, including a template for a thankyou letter. Summary of Comments and Changes to the Final Policy On January 15, 2013, we announced the draft policy and requested public comments via a Federal Register notice (78 FR 3023). The comment period was open from January 15, 2013, through February 15, 2013. We received 14 comment letters on the draft policy. The letters included 69 individual comments on the draft policy. The comments were from Federal government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and individuals. Most of the comments addressed specific elements, while some comments expressed general support, without addressing specific elements. We considered all of the information and recommendations for improvement included in the comments and made appropriate changes to the draft policy. We also made some additions and clarifications to the policy that were not addressed in the public comments, but were discovered through internal briefings and reviews during the policy revision period. Dated: May 27, 2014. Stephen Guertin, Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2014–14102 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34549 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–877] Certain Omega-3 Extracts From Marine or Aquatic Biomass and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion to Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement and License Agreement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 48) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement and license agreement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 17, 2013, based on a complaint filed on January 29, 2013, as amended on March 21, 2013, and supplemented on April 1, 2013, on behalf of Neptune Technologies & Bioressources Inc. and Acasti Pharma Inc., both of Laval, Quebec, Canada (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 78 Fed. Reg. 22898 (April 17, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,278,351 and 8,383,675. The SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 34550 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Aker BioMarine AS of Oslo, Norway; Aker BioMarine Antarctic USA, Inc. of Issaquah, Washington; Aker BioMarine Antarctic AS of Stamsund, Norway (collectively, ‘‘the Aker Respondents’’); Olympic Seafood AS of Fosnavag, Norway; Olympic Biotec Ltd. of New Zealand; Avoca, Inc. of Merry Hill, North Carolina; Rimfrost USA, LLC of Merry Hill, North Carolina; Bioriginal Food & Science Corp. of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (collectively, ‘‘the Olympic Respondents’’); Enzymotec Ltd. of Industrial Zone K’far Baruch, Israel; and Enzymotec USA, Inc. of Morristown, New Jersey (collectively, ‘‘the Enzymotec Respondents’’). The Olympic Respondents were terminated from the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement on November 5, 2013 (Order No. 31, affirmed by the Commission on December 17, 2013). The Aker Respondents were terminated from the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement on December 17, 2013 (Order No. 40, not reviewed by the Commission on January 15, 2014). On May 2, 2014, Complainants and the Enzymotec Respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement and license agreement. On May 13, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 48) granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation. No petitions for review were filed. After considering the subject ID and the relevant portions of the record, the Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The Commission agrees with the ALJ that the joint motion to terminate the investigation complies with the Commission’s rules for termination and that the settlement does not adversely affect the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and U.S. consumers. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 12, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–14147 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:43 Jun 16, 2014 Jkt 232001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1021 (Second Review)] Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From China Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on malleable iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: June 6, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On June 6, 2014, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (79 FR 11819, March 3, 2014) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. Staff Report A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on July 2, 2014, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written Submissions As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before July 8, 2014 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by July 8, 2014. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Please be aware that the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing have been amended. The amendments took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the revised Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by Anvil International LLC and Ward Manufacturing to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34549-34550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-877]


Certain Omega-3 Extracts From Marine or Aquatic Biomass and 
Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion to Terminate the 
Investigation Based on a Settlement and License Agreement; Termination 
of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 48) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-
captioned investigation based on a settlement and license agreement. 
The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 17, 2013, based on a complaint filed on January 29, 2013, as 
amended on March 21, 2013, and supplemented on April 1, 2013, on behalf 
of Neptune Technologies & Bioressources Inc. and Acasti Pharma Inc., 
both of Laval, Quebec, Canada (collectively, ``Complainants''). 78 Fed. 
Reg. 22898 (April 17, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. Sec.  
1337, by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent 
Nos. 8,278,351 and 8,383,675. The

[[Page 34550]]

Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents Aker 
BioMarine AS of Oslo, Norway; Aker BioMarine Antarctic USA, Inc. of 
Issaquah, Washington; Aker BioMarine Antarctic AS of Stamsund, Norway 
(collectively, ``the Aker Respondents''); Olympic Seafood AS of 
Fosnavag, Norway; Olympic Biotec Ltd. of New Zealand; Avoca, Inc. of 
Merry Hill, North Carolina; Rimfrost USA, LLC of Merry Hill, North 
Carolina; Bioriginal Food & Science Corp. of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 
Canada (collectively, ``the Olympic Respondents''); Enzymotec Ltd. of 
Industrial Zone K'far Baruch, Israel; and Enzymotec USA, Inc. of 
Morristown, New Jersey (collectively, ``the Enzymotec Respondents'').
    The Olympic Respondents were terminated from the investigation on 
the basis of a settlement agreement on November 5, 2013 (Order No. 31, 
affirmed by the Commission on December 17, 2013). The Aker Respondents 
were terminated from the investigation on the basis of a settlement 
agreement on December 17, 2013 (Order No. 40, not reviewed by the 
Commission on January 15, 2014).
    On May 2, 2014, Complainants and the Enzymotec Respondents filed a 
joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement and 
license agreement. On May 13, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID 
(Order No. 48) granting the joint motion to terminate the 
investigation. No petitions for review were filed.
    After considering the subject ID and the relevant portions of the 
record, the Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
Commission agrees with the ALJ that the joint motion to terminate the 
investigation complies with the Commission's rules for termination and 
that the settlement does not adversely affect the public health and 
welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, the production of 
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and U.S. 
consumers.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec.  
1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR Part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 12, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-14147 Filed 6-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.