Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 33505-33507 [2014-13644]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of May 2014. Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. Attest: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–13631 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XV–C DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [FR Doc. 2014–13642 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] [Order No. 1940] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone Under the Alternative Site Framework; Cortland County, New York ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ‘‘. . . the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry; Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, Cortland County, New York (the Grantee), has made application to the Board (B–10–2014, docketed 2/6/ 2014), requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone under the ASF with a service area of Cortland County, adjacent to the Syracuse Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the Federal Register (79 FR 8435, 2/12/2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 290, as described in the application, and subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:19 Jun 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–821] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Thailand.1 This review covers six companies. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2012, through July 31, 2013. We preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold at less than normal value by the companies subject to this review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0768 and 202–482–1690, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is polyethylene retail carrier bags, which are currently classified under subheading 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS number is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 69 FR 48204 (August 9, 2004) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33505 Memorandum.2 The written description is dispositive. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// iaaccess.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Methodology In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an adverse inference with respect to Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. (Beyond Packaging), the sole company selected for individual examination in this review. Thus, we preliminarily assign a rate of 122.88 percent as the weighted-average dumping margin for Beyond Packaging. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the Appendix attached to this notice. Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination The statute and the Department’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. In administrative reviews, when the Department does not review all of the respondents, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance in determining a rate for companies not individually examined. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs 2 See memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2012/13 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 33506 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices that we do not calculate an all-others rate using any zero or de minimis weighted-average dumping margins or any weighted-average dumping margins based entirely on facts available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act states that ‘‘if the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for all exporters and producers individually investigated are zero or de minimis, or determined entirely under section 776’’ in an investigation, the Department may ‘‘use any reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated.’’ In this administrative review, the only rate preliminarily applied to an individually examined respondent has been determined entirely pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. Therefore, consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we preliminarily determine that a reasonable method for determining the weighted-average dumping margins for the five non-examined respondents in this review is to apply the all-others rate of 4.69 percent.3 This all-others rate is taken from the Section 129 Determination for the original less-thanfair-value investigation.4 Preliminary Results of Review As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins on PRCBs from Thailand exist for the period August 1, 2011, through July 31, 2012 at the following rates: five days after the date for filing case briefs.5 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.6 Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using IA ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the document is due. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in IA ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussd. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Company Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. ..... 122.88 appropriate entries covered by this Dpac Inter Corporation Co., Ltd. ........................................ 4.69 review. For the final results, if we continue to rely on adverse facts Elite Poly and Packaging Co., Ltd. ........................................ 4.69 available to establish Beyond Poly World Co., Ltd. ................. 4.69 Packaging’s weighted-average dumping Triple B Pack Company Limited 4.69 margin, we will instruct CBP to apply Two Path Plaspack Co., Ltd. .... 4.69 an ad valorem assessment rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of subject Disclosure and Public Comment merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs Beyond Packaging. For the companies which were not not later than 30 days after the date of selected for individual examination we publication of this notice. Rebuttal will instruct CBP to apply an ad briefs, limited to issues raised in the valorem assessment rate of 4.69 percent case briefs, may be filed not later than to all entries of subject merchandise 3 For a full description of the methodology produced and/or exported by such underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary firms. Decision Memorandum. We intend to issue liquidation 4 See Notice of Implementation of Determination instructions to CBP 15 days after Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Rate (percent) Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010)(Section 129 Determination). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:19 Jun 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 19 CFR 351.309(d). 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). publication of the final results of review. We also intend to communicate with CBP regarding Beyond Packaging’s declared address for subject entries and provide evidence to CBP of our attempts to find an accurate address. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of PRCBs from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 4.69 percent.7 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notifications to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 5 See 6 See PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7 See E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM Section 129 Determination. 11JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices Dated: June 4, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the Secretary to publish a notice in the Federal Register identifying the applicant and summarizing its proposed export conduct. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum A. Summary B. Background C. Scope of the Order D. Discussion of the Methodology 1. Selection of Respondents 2. Request for Duty Absorption Determinations 3. Use of Facts Otherwise Available a. Use of Facts Available b. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference c. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used As Facts Available 4. Rate for Non-Selected Companies E. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2014–13644 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [Application No. 84–24A12] Export Trade Certificate of Review Notice of Application To Amend the Export Trade Certificate of Review Issued to Northwest Fruit Exporters, Application No. 84–25A12. ACTION: The Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, has received an application to amend an Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice summarizes the proposed amendment and requests comments relevant to whether the amended Certificate should be issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Competition and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at etca@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. An Export Trade Certificate of Review protects the holder and the members identified in the Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct specified in the Certificate and carried out in compliance with its terms and conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:19 Jun 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 Request for Public Comments Interested parties may submit written comments relevant to the determination whether an amended Certificate should be issued. If the comments include any privileged or confidential business information, it must be clearly marked and a nonconfidential version of the comments (identified as such) should be included. Any comments not marked as privileged or confidential business information will be deemed to be nonconfidential. An original and five (5) copies, plus two (2) copies of the nonconfidential version, should be submitted no later than 20 days after the date of this notice to: Export Trading Company Affairs, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 7025X, Washington, DC 20230. Information submitted by any person is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). However, nonconfidential versions of the comments will be made available to the applicant if necessary for determining whether or not to issue the Certificate. Comments should refer to this application as ‘‘Export Trade Certificate of Review, application number 84–24A12.’’ The Northwest Fruit Exporters’ (‘‘NWF’’) original Certificate was issued on June 11, 1984 (49 FR 24581), and last amended on September 11, 2013 (78 FR 58286). A summary of the current application for an amendment follows. Summary of the Application Applicant: Northwest Fruit Exporters, 105 South 18th Street, Suite 227, Yakima, WA 98901. Contact: Fred Scarlett, Manager, (509) 576–8004. Application No.: 84–25A12. Date Deemed Submitted: May 27, 2014. Proposed Amendment: NWF seeks to amend its Certificate to: 1. Add the following company as a new Member of the Certificate within the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): Garrett Ranches Packing (Wilder, ID); and 2. Remove the following companies as Members of NWF’s Certificate: Eakin Fruit Co. (Union Gap, WA); and Wenoka Sales LLC (Wenatchee, WA); and 3. Change the name of the following member: Underwood Fruit and Warehouse (White Salmon, WA) is now PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33507 The Dalles Fruit Company, LLC (Dallesport, WA). NWFE’s proposed amendment of its Export Trade Certificate of Review would result in the following membership list: Allan Bros., Naches, WA AltaFresh L.L.C. dba Chelan Fresh Marketing, Chelan, WA Apple King, L.L.C., Yakima, WA Auvil Fruit Co., Inc., Orondo, WA Baker Produce, Inc., Kennewick, WA Blue Bird, Inc., Peshastin, WA Blue Mountain Growers, Inc., MiltonFreewater, OR Blue Star Growers, Inc., Cashmere, WA Borton & Sons, Inc., Yakima, WA Brewster Heights Packing & Orchards, LP, Brewster, WA Broetje Orchards LLC, Prescott, WA C& M Fruit Packers, Wenatchee, WA C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, WA Chelan Fruit Cooperative, Chelan, WA Chiawana, Inc. dba Columbia Reach Pack, Yakima, WA Columbia Fruit Packers, Inc., Wenatchee, WA Columbia Marketing International Corp., Wenatchee, WA Columbia Valley Fruit, L.L.C., Yakima, WA Congdon Packing Co. L.L.C., Yakima, WA Conrad & Adams Fruit L.L.C., Grandview, WA Cowiche Growers, Inc., Cowiche, WA CPC International Apple Company, Tieton, WA Crane & Crane, Inc., Brewster, WA Custom Apple Packers, Inc., Brewster, Quincy, and Wenatchee, WA Diamond Fruit Growers, Odell, OR Domex Marketing, Yakima, WA Douglas Fruit Company, Inc., Pasco, WA Dovex Export Company, Wenatchee, WA E. Brown & Sons, Inc., MiltonFreewater, OR Evans Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, WA E.W. Brandt & Sons, Inc., Parker, WA Frosty Packing Co., LLC, Yakima, WA G&G Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA Garrett Ranches Packing, Wilder, ID Gilbert Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA Gold Digger Apples, Inc., Oroville, WA Hansen Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc., Yakima, WA Henggeler Packing Co., Inc., Fruitland, ID Highland Fruit Growers, Inc., Yakima, WA HoneyBear Growers, Inc., (Brewster, WA) Honey Bear Tree Fruit Co., LLC, Wenatchee, WA Hood River Cherry Company, Hood River, OR Ice Lakes LLC, E. Wenatchee, WA E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33505-33507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-821]


Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene 
retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Thailand.\1\ This review covers six 
companies. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2012, through July 
31, 2013. We preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold 
at less than normal value by the companies subject to this review. 
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags 
From Thailand, 69 FR 48204 (August 9, 2004) (Order).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0768 and 202-482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is 
polyethylene retail carrier bags, which are currently classified under 
subheading 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS). The HTSUS number is provided for convenience and 
customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is 
contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The written 
description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2012/13 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Retail Carrier 
Bags from Thailand'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated 
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 
Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Methodology

    In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an 
adverse inference with respect to Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. (Beyond 
Packaging), the sole company selected for individual examination in 
this review. Thus, we preliminarily assign a rate of 122.88 percent as 
the weighted-average dumping margin for Beyond Packaging. For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the Appendix attached to 
this notice.

Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination

    The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not 
selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in 
an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. In 
administrative reviews, when the Department does not review all of the 
respondents, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance in determining a rate for companies not 
individually examined. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs

[[Page 33506]]

that we do not calculate an all-others rate using any zero or de 
minimis weighted-average dumping margins or any weighted-average 
dumping margins based entirely on facts available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) 
of the Act states that ``if the estimated weighted average dumping 
margins established for all exporters and producers individually 
investigated are zero or de minimis, or determined entirely under 
section 776'' in an investigation, the Department may ``use any 
reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for 
exporters and producers not individually investigated.'' In this 
administrative review, the only rate preliminarily applied to an 
individually examined respondent has been determined entirely pursuant 
to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. Therefore, consistent with 
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we preliminarily determine that a 
reasonable method for determining the weighted-average dumping margins 
for the five non-examined respondents in this review is to apply the 
all-others rate of 4.69 percent.\3\ This all-others rate is taken from 
the Section 129 Determination for the original less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \4\ See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of 
the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 
Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010)(Section 129 Determination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that the 
following weighted-average dumping margins on PRCBs from Thailand exist 
for the period August 1, 2011, through July 31, 2012 at the following 
rates:

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Rate
                          Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd..................................       122.88
Dpac Inter Corporation Co., Ltd............................         4.69
Elite Poly and Packaging Co., Ltd..........................         4.69
Poly World Co., Ltd........................................         4.69
Triple B Pack Company Limited..............................         4.69
Two Path Plaspack Co., Ltd.................................         4.69
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, 
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement 
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\6\ Interested parties who wish to comment on the 
preliminary results must file briefs electronically using IA ACCESS. An 
electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety in IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the document 
is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed 
document must be received successfully in its entirety in IA ACCESS by 
5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of 
this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussd. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs.
    The Department intends to issue the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the 
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the 
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review. For the final results, if we continue to rely 
on adverse facts available to establish Beyond Packaging's weighted-
average dumping margin, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 
assessment rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of subject merchandise 
during the POR which were produced and/or exported by Beyond Packaging.
    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate 
of 4.69 percent to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or 
exported by such firms.
    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of review. We also intend to 
communicate with CBP regarding Beyond Packaging's declared address for 
subject entries and provide evidence to CBP of our attempts to find an 
accurate address.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of PRCBs from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates 
for the reviewed companies will be the rates established in the final 
results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers 
or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment 
of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment 
of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but 
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the 
manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 4.69 
percent.\7\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Section 129 Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notifications to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 33507]]


    Dated: June 4, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
D. Discussion of the Methodology
    1. Selection of Respondents
    2. Request for Duty Absorption Determinations
    3. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
    a. Use of Facts Available
    b. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference
    c. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used As Facts 
Available
    4. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
E. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2014-13644 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P