Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE BBO Market Data Product Offering, 33625-33627 [2014-13557]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.80
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–13564 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72332 ; File No. SR–
FINRA–2014–020]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proposed Rule Change To Adopt
FINRA Rule 2081, Prohibited
Conditions Relating to Expungement
of Customer Dispute Information
June 5, 2014.
On April 14, 2014, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to adopt FINRA
Rule 2081 to prohibit member firms and
associated persons from conditioning or
seeking to condition settlement of a
dispute with a customer on, or to
otherwise compensate the customer for,
the customer’s agreement to consent to,
or not to oppose, the firm’s or associated
person’s request to expunge the
customer dispute information which
was the subject of the settlement from
the Central Registration Depository
(CRD®). The proposal was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
April 23, 2014.3 The Commission
received 15 comments on the proposal.4
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71959
(April 17, 2014), 79 FR 22734 (SR–FINRA–2014–
020).
4 See Letter from Steven B. Caruso, Maddox
Hargett Caruso, P.C., dated April 21, 2014; Letter
from Nicole G. Iannarone, Assistant Clinical
Professor, Tim Guilmette, Student Intern, and
Nataliya Obikhod, Student Intern, Georgia State
University College of Law, dated May 1, 2014;
Letter from Ryan K. Bakhtiari, Aidikoff, Uhl and
Bakhtiari, dated May 5, 2014; Letter from Richard
P. Ryder, dated May 5, 2014; Letter from Barry D.
Estell, dated May 7, 2014; Letter from Leonard
Steiner, Steiner & Libo, PC, dated May 7, 2014;
Letter from Philip M. Aidikoff, Aidikoff, Uhl and
Bakhtiari, dated May 1, 2014; Letter from George H.
Friedman, George H. Friedman Consulting, LLC,
dated May 13, 2014; Letter from Jason Doss,
President, Public Investors Arbitration Bar
Association, dated May 13, 2014; Letter from David
T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel, Financial Services Institute, dated May 14,
2014; Letter from Andrea Seidt, Ohio Securities
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
is June 7, 2014. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change
and the comment letters received.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6
designates July 22, 2014 as the date by
which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–FINRA–2014–020).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–13562 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
80 17
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
Commissioner and North American Securities
Administrators Association (‘‘NASAA’’) President,
NASAA, dated May 14, 2014; Letter from Jill Gross,
Director, Elissa Germaine, Supervising Attorney,
and Michelle Robinson, Student Intern, John Jay
Legal Services, Inc., Pace University School of Law,
dated May 14, 2014; Letter from Kevin M. Carroll,
Managing Director and Associate General Counsel,
Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association Small Firms Committee, dated May 14,
2014; Letter from Ronald M. Amato, Amato Law
Firm, LLC, dated May 15, 2014; and Letter from
Harry A. Jacobwitz, Database Manager, Securities
Arbitration Commentator, Inc., dated May 16, 2014.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33625
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72327; File No. SR–NYSE–
2014–27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Amending the
NYSE BBO Market Data Product
Offering
June 5, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on May 23,
2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE BBO market data product
offering. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE BBO market data product
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
33626
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices
offering. In 2010, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
approved the NYSE BBO data feed and
certain fees for it.4 NYSE BBO is an
NYSE-only market data feed that
distributes on a real-time basis the same
best-bid-and-offer information that the
Exchange reports under the
Consolidated Quotation (‘‘CQ’’) Plan for
inclusion in the CQ Plan’s consolidated
quotation information data stream. The
data feed includes the best bids and
offers for all securities that are traded on
the Exchange and for which NYSE
reports quotes under the CQ Plan.
The Exchange has determined to add
information about security status, such
as whether a security is in a short sale
restriction or retail price improvement
indications pursuant to NYSE Rule
107C(j), to the NYSE BBO data feed.
There will be no change to the fees for
the NYSE BBO feed in connection with
this change.5
The Exchange expects to offer the
current NYSE BBO data product and the
proposed NYSE BBO data product with
the added security status information at
the same time for a limited transition
period. After the transition period, the
Exchange will offer only the proposed
NYSE BBO with the added security
status information. The Exchange will
announce the transition dates in
advance.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) 6 of the Act,
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) 7 of the Act, in particular,
in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest, and it is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination among customers,
brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that including
the additional information in NYSE
BBO will provide vendors and
subscribers with a more comprehensive
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62181
(May 26, 2010), 75 FR 31488 (June 3, 2010) (SR–
NYSE–2010–30).
5 When the security status information is added,
NYSE BBO also will be distributed in a new format,
Exchange Data Protocol (‘‘XDP’’). The feed will also
include a symbol index mapping message that will
be sent once a day. These two changes do not affect
the real-time data content that is distributed.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
and higher quality market data product.
The NYSE BBO data feed will help to
protect a free and open market by
providing vendors and subscribers with
additional choices in receiving
proprietary market data, thus promoting
competition and innovation. The
Exchange believes that NYSE BBO offers
an alternative to consolidated data
products and proprietary data products
offered by other exchanges.8 In addition,
the proposal would not permit unfair
discrimination because the product will
be available to all of the Exchange’s
market data vendors and customers on
an equivalent basis.
In adopting Regulation NMS, the
Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (‘‘SROs’’) and brokerdealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique
market data to consumers of such data.
It was believed that this authority would
expand the amount of data available to
users and consumers of such data and
also spur innovation and competition
for the provision of market data. The
Exchange believes that the data
products proposed herein are precisely
the sort of market data products that the
Commission envisioned when it
adopted Regulation NMS. The
Commission concluded that Regulation
NMS—by lessening regulation of the
market in proprietary data—would itself
further the Act’s goals of facilitating
efficiency and competition:
[E]fficiency is promoted when brokerdealers who do not need the data beyond the
prices, sizes, market center identifications of
the NBBO and consolidated last sale
information are not required to receive (and
pay for) such data. The Commission also
believes that efficiency is promoted when
broker-dealers may choose to receive (and
pay for) additional market data based on their
own internal analysis of the need for such
data.9
By removing ‘‘unnecessary regulatory
restrictions’’ on the ability of exchanges
to sell their own data, Regulation NMS
advanced the goals of the Act and the
principles reflected in its legislative
history. The Exchange believes that
offering NYSE BBO with the additional
information reflects innovation in its
product offerings and promotes
competition for the provision of market
data. The existence of alternatives to the
8 For example, NASDAQ Basic includes market
status information including Stock Directory,
Emergency Market Condition event messages,
System Status and Trading Halt information for
NASDAQ, NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca and other
regional exchange listed issues. See NASDAQ Rule
7047 and https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=NASDAQBasic.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005) (File
No. S7–10–04).
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange’s products, including realtime consolidated data and proprietary
data from other exchanges, ensures that
the Exchange is not unreasonably
discriminatory because vendors and
subscribers can elect these alternatives.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The market
for proprietary data products is
currently competitive and inherently
contestable because there is fierce
competition for the inputs necessary to
the creation of proprietary data.
Numerous exchanges compete with
each other for listings, trades, and
market data itself, providing virtually
limitless opportunities for entrepreneurs
who wish to produce and distribute
their own market data. This proprietary
data is produced by each individual
exchange, as well as other entities (such
as internalizing broker-dealers and
various forms of alternative trading
systems, including dark pools and
electronic communication networks), in
a vigorously competitive market. NYSE
BBO offers an alternative to similar
products offered by other exchanges,10
thus promoting competition. The
existence of numerous alternatives to
the Exchange’s products, including realtime consolidated data and proprietary
data from other sources, subjects the
Exchange to vigorous competition.
Vendors and subscribers are free to elect
these alternatives, purchase some or all
of the underlying data feeds, or choose
not to purchase a specific proprietary
data product at all.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 11 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.12 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
10 See
supra note 8.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
11 15
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest,
provided that the self-regulatory
organization has given the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five
business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change or such
shorter time as designated by the
Commission,13 the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 14 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2014–27 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2014–27. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549–1090, on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will
also be available for Web site viewing
and printing at the NYSE’s principal
office and on its Internet Web site at
www.nyse.com. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2014–27 and should be submitted on or
before July 2, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–13557 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72329; File No. SR–CBOE–
2014–017]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment 1, To Amend Its Rules
Related to Complex Orders
June 5, 2014.
I. Introduction
On February 19, 2014, Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend its rules relating to
complex orders. On March 3, 2014, the
15 17
13 The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33627
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change. The proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1 thereto, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 10, 2014.3 The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
rule change. On April 23, 2014, the
Commission extended the time period
in which to either approve the proposal,
disapprove the proposal, or to institute
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposal, to
June 6, 2014.4 This order institutes
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Act 5 to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposal.
II. Description of Proposed Rule Change
Under current CBOE Rule 6.53C(d)(ii),
a Trading Permit Holder representing a
COA-eligible order may request that the
Exchange initiate a complex order
auction (‘‘COA’’) for the COA-eligible
order before such order enters the
complex order book (‘‘COB’’).6 In this
proposed rule change, the Exchange
proposes to require all complex orders
with three or more legs to be subject to
a COA prior to entering the COB.7
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 6.53C(d)(ii) to provide that
CBOE’s Hybrid Trading System 8 (the
‘‘System’’) will initiate a COA on receipt
of: (1) A COA-eligible order with two
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71648
(March 5, 2014), 79 FR 13359 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72008,
79 FR 24032 (April 29, 2014).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
6 Under current CBOE Rule 6.53C(d)(i)(2), the
Exchange may determine on a class-by-class basis
which complex orders are eligible for a COA,
including by complex order type and origin type.
The Exchange notes that currently, in all Hybrid
classes, customer, firm and broker-dealer complex
orders are eligible for a COA, and all complex order
types except for immediate-or-cancel (‘‘IOC’’) orders
are eligible for a COA in all Hybrid classes. See
Notice, supra note 3, n.8. Additionally, only
marketable orders and ‘‘tweeners’’ (limit orders
bettering the same side of the derived net market)
are eligible for a COA. For Hybrid 3.0 classes (i.e.
SPX), all complex order types (including IOC
orders) are eligible for a COA, but only customer
complex orders are eligible for a COA. See id.
(citing CBOE Regulatory Circulars RG06–73, RG08–
38, and RG08–97).
7 The Exchange explains that this proposed
change applies to Hybrid classes only, and not
Hybrid 3.0 classes. See Notice, supra note 3, n.7.
In this regard, the proposed rule change proposes
to amend CBOE Rule 6.53C, Interpretation and
Policy .10 to indicate that complex orders in Hybrid
3.0 classes, regardless of the number of legs, will
initiate a COA in the same manner they currently
do. See id.
8 The proposed rule change proposes to amend
CBOE Rule 6.53C(d)(ii) to say that the System,
rather than the Exchange, will send the RFR
message. See id. at n.9. Because the System will
automatically send the RFR message when the
conditions set forth in CBOE Rule 6.53C(d)(ii) are
met, the Exchange believes using the term ‘‘System’’
in the rule text is appropriate. See id.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33625-33627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13557]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72327; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending the NYSE BBO Market Data Product Offering
June 5, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on May 23, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE BBO market data product
offering. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE BBO market data product
[[Page 33626]]
offering. In 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') approved the NYSE BBO data feed and certain fees for
it.\4\ NYSE BBO is an NYSE-only market data feed that distributes on a
real-time basis the same best-bid-and-offer information that the
Exchange reports under the Consolidated Quotation (``CQ'') Plan for
inclusion in the CQ Plan's consolidated quotation information data
stream. The data feed includes the best bids and offers for all
securities that are traded on the Exchange and for which NYSE reports
quotes under the CQ Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62181 (May 26,
2010), 75 FR 31488 (June 3, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-30).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has determined to add information about security
status, such as whether a security is in a short sale restriction or
retail price improvement indications pursuant to NYSE Rule 107C(j), to
the NYSE BBO data feed. There will be no change to the fees for the
NYSE BBO feed in connection with this change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ When the security status information is added, NYSE BBO also
will be distributed in a new format, Exchange Data Protocol
(``XDP''). The feed will also include a symbol index mapping message
that will be sent once a day. These two changes do not affect the
real-time data content that is distributed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange expects to offer the current NYSE BBO data product and
the proposed NYSE BBO data product with the added security status
information at the same time for a limited transition period. After the
transition period, the Exchange will offer only the proposed NYSE BBO
with the added security status information. The Exchange will announce
the transition dates in advance.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \6\ of the
Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \7\ of
the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that including the additional information in
NYSE BBO will provide vendors and subscribers with a more comprehensive
and higher quality market data product. The NYSE BBO data feed will
help to protect a free and open market by providing vendors and
subscribers with additional choices in receiving proprietary market
data, thus promoting competition and innovation. The Exchange believes
that NYSE BBO offers an alternative to consolidated data products and
proprietary data products offered by other exchanges.\8\ In addition,
the proposal would not permit unfair discrimination because the product
will be available to all of the Exchange's market data vendors and
customers on an equivalent basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For example, NASDAQ Basic includes market status information
including Stock Directory, Emergency Market Condition event
messages, System Status and Trading Halt information for NASDAQ,
NYSE, NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca and other regional exchange listed issues.
See NASDAQ Rule 7047 and https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=NASDAQBasic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (``SROs'') and broker-dealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to consumers of such
data. It was believed that this authority would expand the amount of
data available to users and consumers of such data and also spur
innovation and competition for the provision of market data. The
Exchange believes that the data products proposed herein are precisely
the sort of market data products that the Commission envisioned when it
adopted Regulation NMS. The Commission concluded that Regulation NMS--
by lessening regulation of the market in proprietary data--would itself
further the Act's goals of facilitating efficiency and competition:
[E]fficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the
data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the
NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to
receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that
efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive
(and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal
analysis of the need for such data.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04).
By removing ``unnecessary regulatory restrictions'' on the ability
of exchanges to sell their own data, Regulation NMS advanced the goals
of the Act and the principles reflected in its legislative history. The
Exchange believes that offering NYSE BBO with the additional
information reflects innovation in its product offerings and promotes
competition for the provision of market data. The existence of
alternatives to the Exchange's products, including real-time
consolidated data and proprietary data from other exchanges, ensures
that the Exchange is not unreasonably discriminatory because vendors
and subscribers can elect these alternatives.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The market for proprietary
data products is currently competitive and inherently contestable
because there is fierce competition for the inputs necessary to the
creation of proprietary data. Numerous exchanges compete with each
other for listings, trades, and market data itself, providing virtually
limitless opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and
distribute their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by
each individual exchange, as well as other entities (such as
internalizing broker-dealers and various forms of alternative trading
systems, including dark pools and electronic communication networks),
in a vigorously competitive market. NYSE BBO offers an alternative to
similar products offered by other exchanges,\10\ thus promoting
competition. The existence of numerous alternatives to the Exchange's
products, including real-time consolidated data and proprietary data
from other sources, subjects the Exchange to vigorous competition.
Vendors and subscribers are free to elect these alternatives, purchase
some or all of the underlying data feeds, or choose not to purchase a
specific proprietary data product at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on
[[Page 33627]]
competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date
on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization has
given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed
rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission,\13\ the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \14\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2014-27 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-27. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available
for Web site viewing and printing at the NYSE's principal office and on
its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-27 and should be submitted on
or before July 2, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-13557 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P