Requirements To Document U.S.-Flag Fishing Industry Vessels of 100 Feet or Greater in Registered Length, 33160-33163 [2014-13282]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
33160
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joydeb Majumder, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9121.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Mr. Majumder can be reached via
electronic mail at Majumder.joydeb@
epa.gov.
For
additional information see the
associated direct final rule which is
published in the Rules Section of this
Federal Register. A detailed rationale
for the approval is set forth in the direct
final rule. If no relevant adverse
comments are received in response to
this rule by July 10, 2014, no further
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
relevant adverse comments by July 10,
2014, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all relevant adverse
comments received during the public
comment period will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this document must do so by July 10,
2014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 22, 2014.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2014–13407 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 356
certain large fishing industry vessels,
and eliminates certain exemptions for
specific vessels that were deleted in the
CGMTA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 11, 2014. MARAD will
consider comments filed after this date
to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket Number
MARAD–2014–0043 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search MARAD–
2014–0043 and follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Email: Rulemakings.MARAD@
dot.gov. Include MARAD–2014–0043 in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
If you would like to know that your
comments reached the facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Management Facility is open 9 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
on Federal holidays.
ACTION:
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your
input we recommend that you include your
name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you
if we have questions regarding your
submission. If you submit your inputs by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8 1⁄2 by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing.
The Maritime Administration
(‘‘MARAD’’) is soliciting public
comments on amendments to its
regulations which implement new
requirements regarding certain large
fishing industry vessels set forth in the
American Fisheries Act of 1998, as
amended by the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2010 (‘‘CGAA’’)
and the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 (‘‘CGMTA’’).
The proposed revisions to the regulation
adds two new exceptions to the
restrictions on the eligibility of vessels
over 165 feet in registered length to be
documented with fishery endorsements,
eliminates the 15-day application
deadline for vessels whose fishery
endorsements have become invalid,
limits fishery endorsement eligibility for
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to the docket
at www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
section entitled Public Participation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may contact Michael C. Pucci, Attorney
Advisor, Division of Maritime Programs,
Maritime Administration, at (202) 366–
5320. You may send mail to Michael C.
Pucci at Maritime Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., MAR 222,
W24–217, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
You may send electronic mail to
[Docket Number MARAD–2014–0043]
RIN 2133–AB86
Requirements To Document U.S.-Flag
Fishing Industry Vessels of 100 Feet or
Greater in Registered Length
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice of proposed rulemaking,
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Michael.Pucci@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing the Docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone: (800)
647–5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
Section 602(a) of the CGAA added
two new exceptions to the restrictions
on the eligibility of vessels over 165 feet
in registered length to be documented
with fishery endorsements found at 46
U.S.C. 12113(d): (1) Replaced or rebuilt
vessels and (2) fish tender vessels.
CGAA also eliminated the 15-day
application deadline for vessels whose
fishery endorsements had become
invalid. Exemptions from the large
fishing industry vessel restrictions are
found in our regulations at 46 CFR
356.47.
In addition, section 601(b)(2) of the
CGAA repealed section 203(g) of the
AFA, which exempted particular vessels
from the ownership requirements of 46
U.S.C. 12113. These exempt vessels are
currently listed in our regulations at 46
CFR 356.51.
Section 307 of the CGMTA added
further restrictions on large vessels
under 46 U.S.C. 12113(d) by limiting
those vessels from participating in the
non-AFA trawl catcher processor
subsector.
Accordingly, MARAD finds it
necessary to update its regulations
under 46 CFR part 356 to reflect these
amendments to the AFA and 46 U.S.C.
12113.
Public Participation
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number in your comments. MARAD
encourages you to provide concise
comments. However, you may attach
necessary additional documents to your
comments. There is no limit on the
length of the attachments. Please submit
your comments, including the
attachments, following the instructions
provided under the above heading
entitled ADDRESSES.
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Department
of Transportation, Maritime
Administration, Office of Legislation
and Regulations, MAR–225, W24–220,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. When you send
comments containing information
claimed to be confidential information,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
33161
you should include a cover letter setting
forth with specificity the basis for any
such claim.
MARAD will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent
possible, MARAD will also consider
comments received after that date. If a
comment is received too late for
MARAD to consider in developing a
final rule (assuming that one is issued),
MARAD will consider that comment as
an informal suggestion for future
rulemaking action.
For access to the docket to read
background documents, including those
referenced in this document, or to
submit or read comments received, go to
the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
The Docket Management Facility is
open 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To
review documents, read comments or to
submit comments, the docket is also
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, keyword search
MARAD–2014–0043.
Please note that even after the
comment period has closed, MARAD
will continue to file relevant
information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may
submit late comments. Accordingly,
MARAD recommends that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
OMB review and the requirements of
the E.O. The Order defines ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one likely to result
in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities. (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another Agency. (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof. (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the E.O.
MARAD has determined that this
notice of proposed rulemaking is not
considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, it was not
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. This rulemaking will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more. It is
also not considered a major rule for
purposes of Congressional review under
Public Law 104–121. This rulemaking is
also not significant under the Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation (44 FR
11034, February 26, 1979). The costs
and overall economic impact of this
rulemaking do not require further
analysis.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT Privacy Act system of
records notice for the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) in the
Federal Register published on January
17, 2008, (73 FR 3316) at https://
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8785.pdf.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
We analyzed this rulemaking in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’) and have
determined that it does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
summary impact statement. This
rulemaking has no substantial effect on
the States, or on the current FederalState relationship, or on the current
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various local
officials. Nothing in this document
preempts any State law or regulation.
Therefore, MARAD did not consult with
State and local officials because it was
not necessary.
Rulemaking Analysis and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) and DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures. Under E.O. 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
supplemented by E.O. 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 18, 2011) and DOT
policies and procedures, MARAD must
determine whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant,’’ and therefore subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments)
MARAD does not believe that this
rulemaking will significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
33162
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments).
Therefore, the funding and consultation
requirements of this Executive Order do
not apply.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
requires MARAD to assess whether this
rulemaking would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities and to
minimize any adverse impact. MARAD
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Assessment
We have analyzed this rulemaking for
purposes of compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and have
concluded that under the categorical
exclusions provision in section 4.05 of
Maritime Administrative Order (MAO)
600–1, ‘‘Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts,’’ 50 FR 11606
(March 22, 1985), neither the
preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact
Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is
required. This rulemaking has no
environmental impact.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
MARAD has determined that this
rulemaking will not significantly affect
energy supply, distribution, or use.
Therefore, no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks, requires
agencies issuing ‘‘economically
significant’’ rules that involve an
environmental health or safety risk that
may disproportionately affect children,
to include an evaluation of the
regulation’s environmental health and
safety effects on children. As discussed
previously, this rulemaking is not
economically significant, and will cause
no environmental or health risk that
disproportionately affects children.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminates
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used
to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This rulemaking will not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. This
rulemaking proposes to update the
regulations with two new exceptions to
the restrictions on the eligibility of
vessels over 165 feet in registered length
to be documented with fishery
endorsements, removes certain
exemptions relating to specific vessels,
and adds restrictions on large vessels by
limiting those vessels from participating
in the non-AFA trawl catcher processor
subsector. This rulemaking contains no
new or amended information collection
or recordkeeping requirements that have
been approved or require approval by
the Office of Management and Budget.
International Trade Impact Assessment
This rulemaking is not expected to
contain standards-related activities that
create unnecessary obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States.
Privacy Impact Assessment
Section 522(a)(5) of the
Transportation, Treasury, Independent
Agencies, and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. L. 108–
447, div. H, 118 Stat. 2809 at 3268)
requires the Department of
Transportation and certain other Federal
agencies to conduct a privacy impact
assessment of each proposed rule that
will affect the privacy of individuals.
Claims submitted under this rule will be
treated the same as all legal claims
received by MARAD. The processing
and treatment of any claim within the
scope of this rulemaking by MARAD
shall comply with all legal, regulatory
and policy requirements regarding
privacy.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires Agencies to evaluate
whether an Agency action would result
in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $141.3 million
or more (as adjusted for inflation) in any
1 year, and if so, to take steps to
minimize these unfunded mandates.
This rulemaking will not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It will not result in costs of $141.3
million or more to either State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, and is the least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 356
Citizenship and naturalization,
Fishing vessels, Mortgages, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Maritime Administration
proposes to amend 46 CFR part 356 as
follows:
PART 356—REQUIREMENTS FOR
VESSELS OF 100 FEET OR GREATER
IN REGISTERED LENGTH TO OBTAIN
A FISHERY ENDORSEMENT TO THE
VESSEL’S DOCUMENTATION
1. The authority citation for part 356
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 12102; 46 U.S.C.
31322; Pub. L. 105–277, division C, title II,
subtitle I, section 203 (46 U.S.C. 12102 note),
section 210(e), and section 213(g), 112 Stat.
2681; Pub. L. 107–20, section 2202, 115 Stat.
168–170; 49 CFR 1.66.
2. Revise § 356.47(b) to read as
follows:
(b) A vessel that meets one or more of
the conditions in paragraph (a) of this
section may still be eligible for a fishery
endorsement if:
(1) A certificate of documentation was
issued for the vessel and endorsed with
a fishery endorsement that was effective
on September 25, 1997;
(2) The vessel—
(i) is either a rebuilt vessel or
replacement vessel under section 208(g)
of the American Fisheries Act (title II of
■
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
division C of Pub. L. 105–277; 112 Stat.
2681–627);
(ii) is eligible for a fishery
endorsement under this section; and
(iii) in the case of a vessel listed in
paragraphs (1) through (20) of section
208(e) of the American Fisheries Act
(title II of division C of Pub. L. 105–277;
112 Stat. 2681–625 et seq.) is neither
participating in nor eligible to
participate in the non-AFA trawl
catcher processor subsector (as that term
is defined under section 219(a)(7) of the
Department of Commerce and Related
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. L. 108–
447; 118 Stat. 2887); or
(3) The vessel is a fish tender vessel
that is not engaged in harvesting or
processing of fish.
■ 3. Revise § 356.47(c) to read as
follows:
(c) A vessel that is prohibited from
receiving a fishery endorsement under
paragraph (a) of this section will be
eligible if the owner of such vessel
demonstrates to MARAD that
(i) The regional fishery management
council of jurisdiction established under
section 302(a)(1) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1))
has recommended after October 21,
1998, and the Secretary of Commerce
has approved, conservation and
management measures in accordance
with the American Fisheries Act (Pub.
L. 105–277, div. C, title II) (16 U.S.C.
1851 note) to allow the vessel to be used
in fisheries under the
council’sAuthority; and
(ii) In the case of a vessel listed in
paragraphs (1) through (20) of section
208(e) of the American Fisheries Act
(title II of division C of Pub. L. 105–277;
112 Stat. 2681–625 et seq.), the vessel is
neither participating in nor eligible to
participate in the non-AFA trawl catch
processor subsector (as that term is
defined under section 219(a)(7) of the
Department of Commerce and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2005
(Pub. L. 108–447; 118 Stat. 2887)).
■ 4. Remove § 356.51(a) through (d) and
redesignate § 356.51(e) through (f) as
§ 356.51(a) and (b), respectively.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: June 3, 2014.
Christine Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–13282 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 20
[PS Docket No. 07–114; FCC 14–13]
Wireless E911 Location Accuracy
Requirements
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Extension of comment deadline.
AGENCY:
The Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau extends the
deadline for filing reply comments on
the Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Third FNPRM) which was
published in the Federal Register on
March 28, 2014. The extension will
provide commenters with additional
time to prepare reply comments in
response to the Third FNPRM and
initial comments filed in this docket.
DATES: The reply comment period for
the proposed rules published at 79 FR
17819, March 28, 2014 is extended.
Submit reply comments by July 14,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554, identified by PS Docket No. 07–
114. Comments may be submitted
electronically through the Federal
Communications Commission’s Web
site: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Parties wishing to file materials with a
claim of confidentiality should follow
the procedures set forth in § 0.459 of the
Commission’s rules. Confidential
submissions may not be filed via ECFS
but rather should be filed with the
Secretary’s Office following the
procedures set forth in 47 CFR 0.459.
Redacted versions of confidential
submissions may be filed via ECFS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dana Zelman of the Policy and
Licensing Division of the Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau, (202)
418–0546 or dana.zelman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Order in PS Docket No.
07–114, released on June 4, 2014, which
extends the reply comment deadline
established in the Third Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking published
under FCC No. 14–13 at 79 FR 17819,
March 28, 2014. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or online at—
https://www.fcc.gov/document/proposesnew-indoor-requirements-and-revisionsexisting-e911-rules.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
33163
Summary of Order
On February 20, 2014, the
Commission adopted a Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Third
FNPRM) in this docket, seeking
comment on proposed wireless E911
location accuracy requirements. The
Third Further NPRM set deadlines for
filing comments and reply comments of
May 12, 2014 and June 11, 2014,
respectively.
On May 29, 2014, CTIA—The
Wireless Association (CTIA) filed a
request to extend the reply comment
deadline an additional 30 days, until
July 14, 2014. CTIA states that an
extension of time is warranted due to
the complex issues presented by the
Third NPRM and the large number of
initial comments filed in this docket.
The National Emergency Number
Association, Competitive Carrier
Association, and Texas 911 Entities
filed letters in support of CTIA’s
request.
We grant the request for an extension
of time. As set forth in Section 1.46 of
the Commission’s rules, the
Commission’s policy is that extensions
of time for filing comments in
rulemaking proceedings shall not be
routinely granted. In this case, however,
an extension of the reply comment
period is warranted for the reasons
identified by CTIA. Specifically, we find
that extension of the reply comment
deadline to July 14, 2014 is warranted
to provide commenters with sufficient
time to prepare reply comments that
fully respond to the complex technical,
economic, and policy issues raised in
the Third FNPRM and comments filed
thereafter.
Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to Section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), and Sections
0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.191,
0.392, and 1.46, the Motion for
Extension of Time filed by CTIA is
granted, and the deadline to file reply
comments in this proceeding is
extended to July 14, 2014.
Federal Communications Commission.
David G. Simpson,
Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2014–13533 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 111 (Tuesday, June 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33160-33163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13282]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 356
[Docket Number MARAD-2014-0043]
RIN 2133-AB86
Requirements To Document U.S.-Flag Fishing Industry Vessels of
100 Feet or Greater in Registered Length
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration (``MARAD'') is soliciting public
comments on amendments to its regulations which implement new
requirements regarding certain large fishing industry vessels set forth
in the American Fisheries Act of 1998, as amended by the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2010 (``CGAA'') and the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 (``CGMTA''). The proposed revisions to the
regulation adds two new exceptions to the restrictions on the
eligibility of vessels over 165 feet in registered length to be
documented with fishery endorsements, eliminates the 15-day application
deadline for vessels whose fishery endorsements have become invalid,
limits fishery endorsement eligibility for certain large fishing
industry vessels, and eliminates certain exemptions for specific
vessels that were deleted in the CGMTA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 11, 2014. MARAD
will consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket Number
MARAD-2014-0043 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search MARAD-2014-0043 and follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: Rulemakings.MARAD@dot.gov. Include MARAD-2014-0043
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590. If you would like to know that your comments
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Management
Facility is open 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on
Federal holidays.
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your input we recommend
that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. If you
submit your inputs by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8 \1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to the
docket at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the section
entitled Public Participation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may contact Michael C. Pucci,
Attorney Advisor, Division of Maritime Programs, Maritime
Administration, at (202) 366-5320. You may send mail to Michael C.
Pucci at Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., MAR 222,
W24-217, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You may send electronic mail to
[[Page 33161]]
Michael.Pucci@dot.gov. If you have questions on viewing the Docket,
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone:
(800) 647-5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 602(a) of the CGAA added two new exceptions to the
restrictions on the eligibility of vessels over 165 feet in registered
length to be documented with fishery endorsements found at 46 U.S.C.
12113(d): (1) Replaced or rebuilt vessels and (2) fish tender vessels.
CGAA also eliminated the 15-day application deadline for vessels whose
fishery endorsements had become invalid. Exemptions from the large
fishing industry vessel restrictions are found in our regulations at 46
CFR 356.47.
In addition, section 601(b)(2) of the CGAA repealed section 203(g)
of the AFA, which exempted particular vessels from the ownership
requirements of 46 U.S.C. 12113. These exempt vessels are currently
listed in our regulations at 46 CFR 356.51.
Section 307 of the CGMTA added further restrictions on large
vessels under 46 U.S.C. 12113(d) by limiting those vessels from
participating in the non-AFA trawl catcher processor subsector.
Accordingly, MARAD finds it necessary to update its regulations
under 46 CFR part 356 to reflect these amendments to the AFA and 46
U.S.C. 12113.
Public Participation
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number in your comments. MARAD encourages you to provide concise
comments. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to
your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments.
Please submit your comments, including the attachments, following the
instructions provided under the above heading entitled ADDRESSES.
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Department of Transportation, Maritime
Administration, Office of Legislation and Regulations, MAR-225, W24-
220, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. When you send
comments containing information claimed to be confidential information,
you should include a cover letter setting forth with specificity the
basis for any such claim.
MARAD will consider all comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To
the extent possible, MARAD will also consider comments received after
that date. If a comment is received too late for MARAD to consider in
developing a final rule (assuming that one is issued), MARAD will
consider that comment as an informal suggestion for future rulemaking
action.
For access to the docket to read background documents, including
those referenced in this document, or to submit or read comments
received, go to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Management Facility is open 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. To
review documents, read comments or to submit comments, the docket is
also available online at https://www.regulations.gov, keyword search
MARAD-2014-0043.
Please note that even after the comment period has closed, MARAD
will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
MARAD recommends that you periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT
Privacy Act system of records notice for the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) in the Federal Register published on January 17, 2008,
(73 FR 3316) at https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Rulemaking Analysis and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures. Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), supplemented by E.O. 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 18, 2011) and
DOT policies and procedures, MARAD must determine whether a regulatory
action is ``significant,'' and therefore subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the E.O. The Order defines ``significant regulatory
action'' as one likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or tribal government or communities. (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency. (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof. (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in the E.O.
MARAD has determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not
considered a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it was not reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget. This rulemaking will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more. It is also not
considered a major rule for purposes of Congressional review under
Public Law 104-121. This rulemaking is also not significant under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). The costs and overall economic impact
of this rulemaking do not require further analysis.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
We analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') and have
determined that it does not have sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This
rulemaking has no substantial effect on the States, or on the current
Federal-State relationship, or on the current distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various local officials. Nothing in this
document preempts any State law or regulation. Therefore, MARAD did not
consult with State and local officials because it was not necessary.
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments)
MARAD does not believe that this rulemaking will significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and
[[Page 33162]]
criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments). Therefore, the funding
and consultation requirements of this Executive Order do not apply.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires MARAD to assess
whether this rulemaking would have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and to minimize any adverse
impact. MARAD certifies that this rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Assessment
We have analyzed this rulemaking for purposes of compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and have concluded that under the categorical exclusions provision in
section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600-1, ``Procedures
for Considering Environmental Impacts,'' 50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985),
neither the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, an
Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No Significant Impact
for this rulemaking is required. This rulemaking has no environmental
impact.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
MARAD has determined that this rulemaking will not significantly
affect energy supply, distribution, or use. Therefore, no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks, requires agencies issuing ``economically
significant'' rules that involve an environmental health or safety risk
that may disproportionately affect children, to include an evaluation
of the regulation's environmental health and safety effects on
children. As discussed previously, this rulemaking is not economically
significant, and will cause no environmental or health risk that
disproportionately affects children.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminates
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This rulemaking will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
International Trade Impact Assessment
This rulemaking is not expected to contain standards-related
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States.
Privacy Impact Assessment
Section 522(a)(5) of the Transportation, Treasury, Independent
Agencies, and General Government Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. L. 108-
447, div. H, 118 Stat. 2809 at 3268) requires the Department of
Transportation and certain other Federal agencies to conduct a privacy
impact assessment of each proposed rule that will affect the privacy of
individuals. Claims submitted under this rule will be treated the same
as all legal claims received by MARAD. The processing and treatment of
any claim within the scope of this rulemaking by MARAD shall comply
with all legal, regulatory and policy requirements regarding privacy.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires Agencies to
evaluate whether an Agency action would result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $141.3 million or more (as adjusted for inflation)
in any 1 year, and if so, to take steps to minimize these unfunded
mandates. This rulemaking will not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It will not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulations. This rulemaking proposes to update the regulations with
two new exceptions to the restrictions on the eligibility of vessels
over 165 feet in registered length to be documented with fishery
endorsements, removes certain exemptions relating to specific vessels,
and adds restrictions on large vessels by limiting those vessels from
participating in the non-AFA trawl catcher processor subsector. This
rulemaking contains no new or amended information collection or
recordkeeping requirements that have been approved or require approval
by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 356
Citizenship and naturalization, Fishing vessels, Mortgages,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Maritime
Administration proposes to amend 46 CFR part 356 as follows:
PART 356--REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS OF 100 FEET OR GREATER IN
REGISTERED LENGTH TO OBTAIN A FISHERY ENDORSEMENT TO THE VESSEL'S
DOCUMENTATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 356 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 12102; 46 U.S.C. 31322; Pub. L. 105-277,
division C, title II, subtitle I, section 203 (46 U.S.C. 12102
note), section 210(e), and section 213(g), 112 Stat. 2681; Pub. L.
107-20, section 2202, 115 Stat. 168-170; 49 CFR 1.66.
0
2. Revise Sec. 356.47(b) to read as follows:
(b) A vessel that meets one or more of the conditions in paragraph
(a) of this section may still be eligible for a fishery endorsement if:
(1) A certificate of documentation was issued for the vessel and
endorsed with a fishery endorsement that was effective on September 25,
1997;
(2) The vessel--
(i) is either a rebuilt vessel or replacement vessel under section
208(g) of the American Fisheries Act (title II of
[[Page 33163]]
division C of Pub. L. 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-627);
(ii) is eligible for a fishery endorsement under this section; and
(iii) in the case of a vessel listed in paragraphs (1) through (20)
of section 208(e) of the American Fisheries Act (title II of division C
of Pub. L. 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-625 et seq.) is neither
participating in nor eligible to participate in the non-AFA trawl
catcher processor subsector (as that term is defined under section
219(a)(7) of the Department of Commerce and Related Appropriations Act,
2005 (Pub. L. 108-447; 118 Stat. 2887); or
(3) The vessel is a fish tender vessel that is not engaged in
harvesting or processing of fish.
0
3. Revise Sec. 356.47(c) to read as follows:
(c) A vessel that is prohibited from receiving a fishery
endorsement under paragraph (a) of this section will be eligible if the
owner of such vessel demonstrates to MARAD that
(i) The regional fishery management council of jurisdiction
established under section 302(a)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)) has recommended
after October 21, 1998, and the Secretary of Commerce has approved,
conservation and management measures in accordance with the American
Fisheries Act (Pub. L. 105-277, div. C, title II) (16 U.S.C. 1851 note)
to allow the vessel to be used in fisheries under the
council'sAuthority; and
(ii) In the case of a vessel listed in paragraphs (1) through (20)
of section 208(e) of the American Fisheries Act (title II of division C
of Pub. L. 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-625 et seq.), the vessel is neither
participating in nor eligible to participate in the non-AFA trawl catch
processor subsector (as that term is defined under section 219(a)(7) of
the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2005 (Pub. L. 108-447; 118 Stat. 2887)).
0
4. Remove Sec. 356.51(a) through (d) and redesignate Sec. 356.51(e)
through (f) as Sec. 356.51(a) and (b), respectively.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: June 3, 2014.
Christine Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-13282 Filed 6-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P