Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 32913-32915 [2014-13433]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Co., Ltd; and, (12) Yu Shin Development Co. Ltd. For those exporters named in the Initiation Notice for which all administrative review requests have been withdrawn, but which have not previously received separate rate status, the Department’s practice is to refrain from rescinding the administrative review with respect to these exporters at this time.7 As stated above, requests for review of several exporters belonging to the PRC-wide entity were timely withdrawn. While the requests for review were timely withdrawn, the exporters remain part of the PRC-wide entity. The PRC-wide entity is under review for these preliminary results. Therefore, at this time, we are not rescinding this administrative review with respect to those exporters belonging to the PRC-wide entity for which a request for review has been withdrawn. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.12 The Department will issue the final results of this AR, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs received, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates With regard to the partial rescission of this review, the Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue appropriate partial rescission assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these preliminary results of review in the Federal Register. Upon issuing the final results of this review, the Department will determine, Preliminary Results of Review and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered We preliminarily determine that the by these reviews.13 The Department following weighted-average dumping intends to issue assessment instructions margins exist for the period September to CBP 15 days after the publication 1, 2012, through August 31, 2013. date of the final results of this review. The Department announced a Weightedaverage refinement to its assessment practice in Exporter dumping NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement margin in practice, for entries that were not (percent) reported in the U.S. sales database PRC-wide entity 8 ........................ 247.65 submitted by companies individually examined during the administrative review, the Department will instruct Public Comment and Opportunity To CBP to liquidate such entries at the Request a Hearing PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Interested parties may submit case Department determines that an exporter briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries results of review.9 Rebuttals briefs may that entered under that exporter’s case be filed no later than five days after the number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will written comments are filed and all be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.14 rebuttal comments must be limited to comments raised in the case briefs.10 Cash Deposit Requirements Any interested party may request a The following cash deposit hearing within 30 days of publication of requirements will be effective upon 11 Hearing requests should this notice. publication of the final results of this contain the following information: (1) review for shipments of subject The party’s name, address, and merchandise from the PRC entered, or telephone number; (2) the number of withdrawn from warehouse, for participants; and (3) a list of the issues consumption on or after the publication to be discussed. Oral presentations will date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) be limited to issues raised in the briefs. of the Act: (1) For any previously If a request for a hearing is made, parties reviewed or investigated PRC and nonwill be notified of the time and date for PRC exporter not listed above that the hearing to be held at the U.S. received a separate rate in a previous segment of this proceeding, the cash 7 See, e.g., Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes deposit rate will continue to be the from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– existing exporter-specific rate published 2012, 78 FR 55680 (September 11, 2013). 8 The PRC-wide entity includes, among other companies, Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co., Ltd. 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 11 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:08 Jun 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 12 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 19 CFR 351.212(b). 14 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 13 See PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32913 for the most recently completed period; (2) for all PRC exporters that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 247.65 percent); and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: June 2, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Background 2. Period of Review 3. Scope of the Order 4. Respondent Selection 5. Partial Rescission of Review 6. Intent Not To Rescind Review, in Part 7. Separate Rates Determination 8. The PRC-Wide Entity 9. Rate for the PRC-Wide Entity [FR Doc. 2014–13436 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–930] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM 09JNN1 32914 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation of the antidumping (‘‘AD’’) duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca or Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4551 or (202) 482– 5193, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On March 17, 2009, the Department published the AD order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC.1 On February 3, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of this AD order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.2 On February 14, 2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1), the Department received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in the sunset review of the order from Bristol Metals LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc. (collectively ‘‘Domestic Producers’’). On March 4, 2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3), Domestic Producers filed a timely and adequate substantive response. The Department did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this AD order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A– 554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is provided in the accompanying I&D Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 The issues discussed in the I&D Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the order is revoked. The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// iaaccess.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum can be accessed at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed I&D Memorandum and the electronic version of the I&D Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review The Department determines that revocation of the AD order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail are at the following rates: Weighted-average margin (percent) Exporter and producer Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd. Produced by: Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd ............................................... PRC-Wide Entity—All Other Exporters and Producers ........................................................................................................... ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009) (‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 FR 6163 (February 3, 2014) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:08 Jun 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 10.53 55.21 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties 3 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘I&D Memorandum’’). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM 09JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices Dated: May 29, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–13433 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–955] Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks (MCBs) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), covering the period of review (POR) January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012. We preliminarily determine that the application of adverse facts available (AFA) to the sole mandatory respondent, Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City and Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng City (collectively, Fengchi), and the Government of the PRC (GOC), is necessary because they failed to cooperate to the best of their ability in this proceeding. The Department also preliminarily finds that certain companies made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Steele, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4956. AGENCY: ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order includes certain MCBs. Certain MCBs that are the subject of this order are currently classifiable under the following subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000, 66815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000, and 6815.99.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:08 Jun 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 description remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department’s Central Records Unit, located in Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On December 13, 2013, the Department received timely no shipment certifications from RHI AG and its affiliates: Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesia Co.; RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co. Ltd.; RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd.; RHI Trading Shanghai Branch; and RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, the RHI Companies).1 Because there is no evidence on the record to indicate that these companies had sales of subject merchandise during the POR, we preliminarily determine that the RHI Companies had no shipments during the POR. As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department intends to rescind the review with respect to the RHI Companies. However, the Department finds that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to the RHI 1 See the December 13, 2013, Letter to the Secretary, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China: Notice of No Sales.’’ In our Initiation Notice, we stated that any company named in the notice of initiation that had no exports, sales, or entries during the POR must notify the Department within 60 days of publication of the notice in the Federal Register. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 67104, 67104 (November 8, 2013) (Initiation Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32915 Companies at this time; instead, consistent with our practice, the Department will complete the review with respect to the RHI Companies and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the final results of the review.2 Information on the record shows that Fengchi did have sales of subject merchandise during the POR.3 Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each subsidy program under review, we preliminarily determine there are countervailable subsidies, i.e., that there is a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.4 In making these findings, we relied on AFA for Fengchi, because it did not act to the best of its ability to respond to our request for information; as such, we drew an adverse inference in selecting among the facts available.5 With respect to the remaining companies for which we initiated reviews and that did not file noshipment certifications, we will assign to entries made by these companies the all-others rate from the investigation. Accordingly, and consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act, we relied upon the all others rate from the investigation because the rate calculated for the sole mandatory respondent in these preliminary results of review is based entirely upon facts available. We consider the use of the all others rate from the investigation, which was based upon a calculated rate for one of the mandatory respondents in the investigation, to be a ‘‘reasonable method’’ for calculating the all others rate because it represents the only rate in the history of the countervailing duty order on MCBs from the PRC that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely upon facts available.6 2 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 12, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). 3 See the January 13, 2014, Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s Republic of China: Customs Data of U.S. Imports of Magnesia Carbon Bricks.’’ 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and, section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 5 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. 6 For a list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, see Appendix I. For a full E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM Continued 09JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32913-32915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-930]


Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset 
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 32914]]


SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce 
(``the Department'') finds that revocation of the antidumping (``AD'') 
duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from 
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the margins of 
dumping likely to prevail is indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset 
Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca or Howard Smith, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4551 or (202) 482-5193, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 17, 2009, the Department published the AD order on 
circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC.\1\ On 
February 3, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of 
the sunset review of this AD order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the 
Act.\2\ On February 14, 2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1), the 
Department received a timely and complete notice of intent to 
participate in the sunset review of the order from Bristol Metals LLC, 
Felker Brothers Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc. 
(collectively ``Domestic Producers''). On March 4, 2014, pursuant to 19 
CFR 351.218(d)(3), Domestic Producers filed a timely and adequate 
substantive response. The Department did not receive substantive 
responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant 
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 
the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this 
AD order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic 
Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People's Republic of China, 74 FR 
11351 (March 17, 2009) (``Antidumping Duty Order'').
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 6163 
(February 3, 2014) (``Sunset Initiation'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic 
stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. 
This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society 
for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or 
comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A-358 products are 
only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A-312 or ASTM A-778 
specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. 
Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, 
meeting ASTM A-554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; 
(2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater 
heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A-249, ASTM A-688 or 
comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized 
tubing, meeting ASTM A-269, ASTM A-270 or comparable domestic or 
foreign specifications.
    The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 
7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 
7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 
7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 
7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only, the written description of the scope of this 
order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is 
provided in the accompanying I&D Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by 
this notice.\3\ The issues discussed in the I&D Memorandum include the 
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude 
of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the order is revoked. 
The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). Access to IA 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov 
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main 
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
I&D Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 
The signed I&D Memorandum and the electronic version of the I&D 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First 
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded 
Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People's Republic of 
China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated 
concurrently with this notice (``I&D Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Review

    The Department determines that revocation of the AD order on 
circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC would 
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and 
magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail are at the 
following rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Weighted-average
               Exporter and producer                  margin  (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd. Produced                   10.53
 by: Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd.......
PRC-Wide Entity--All Other Exporters and Producers                 55.21
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218.


[[Page 32915]]


    Dated: May 29, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-13433 Filed 6-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P