Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 32913-32915 [2014-13433]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Co., Ltd; and, (12) Yu Shin Development
Co. Ltd. For those exporters named in
the Initiation Notice for which all
administrative review requests have
been withdrawn, but which have not
previously received separate rate status,
the Department’s practice is to refrain
from rescinding the administrative
review with respect to these exporters at
this time.7 As stated above, requests for
review of several exporters belonging to
the PRC-wide entity were timely
withdrawn. While the requests for
review were timely withdrawn, the
exporters remain part of the PRC-wide
entity. The PRC-wide entity is under
review for these preliminary results.
Therefore, at this time, we are not
rescinding this administrative review
with respect to those exporters
belonging to the PRC-wide entity for
which a request for review has been
withdrawn.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.12
The Department will issue the final
results of this AR, which will include
the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any briefs received, within 120 days
of publication of these preliminary
results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
With regard to the partial rescission of
this review, the Department will
instruct Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. The Department
intends to issue appropriate partial
rescission assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after publication
of these preliminary results of review in
the Federal Register.
Upon issuing the final results of this
review, the Department will determine,
Preliminary Results of Review
and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
We preliminarily determine that the
by these reviews.13 The Department
following weighted-average dumping
intends to issue assessment instructions
margins exist for the period September
to CBP 15 days after the publication
1, 2012, through August 31, 2013.
date of the final results of this review.
The Department announced a
Weightedaverage
refinement to its assessment practice in
Exporter
dumping
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement
margin
in practice, for entries that were not
(percent)
reported in the U.S. sales database
PRC-wide entity 8 ........................
247.65 submitted by companies individually
examined during the administrative
review, the Department will instruct
Public Comment and Opportunity To
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
Request a Hearing
PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the
Interested parties may submit case
Department determines that an exporter
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of these preliminary had no shipments of subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
results of review.9 Rebuttals briefs may
that entered under that exporter’s case
be filed no later than five days after the
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
written comments are filed and all
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.14
rebuttal comments must be limited to
comments raised in the case briefs.10
Cash Deposit Requirements
Any interested party may request a
The following cash deposit
hearing within 30 days of publication of requirements will be effective upon
11 Hearing requests should
this notice.
publication of the final results of this
contain the following information: (1)
review for shipments of subject
The party’s name, address, and
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
telephone number; (2) the number of
withdrawn from warehouse, for
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
consumption on or after the publication
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
be limited to issues raised in the briefs.
of the Act: (1) For any previously
If a request for a hearing is made, parties reviewed or investigated PRC and nonwill be notified of the time and date for
PRC exporter not listed above that
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
received a separate rate in a previous
segment of this proceeding, the cash
7 See, e.g., Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
deposit rate will continue to be the
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– existing exporter-specific rate published
2012, 78 FR 55680 (September 11, 2013).
8 The PRC-wide entity includes, among other
companies, Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co.,
Ltd.
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
11 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Jun 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
12 See
19 CFR 351.310(d).
19 CFR 351.212(b).
14 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
13 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32913
for the most recently completed period;
(2) for all PRC exporters that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be that
for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 247.65
percent); and (3) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied the non-PRC exporter. These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: June 2, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Background
2. Period of Review
3. Scope of the Order
4. Respondent Selection
5. Partial Rescission of Review
6. Intent Not To Rescind Review, in Part
7. Separate Rates Determination
8. The PRC-Wide Entity
9. Rate for the PRC-Wide Entity
[FR Doc. 2014–13436 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–930]
Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless
Pressure Pipe From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32914
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices
As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation
of the antidumping (‘‘AD’’) duty order
on circular welded austenitic stainless
pressure pipe from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping. The magnitude
of the margins of dumping likely to
prevail is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results
of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Apodaca or Howard Smith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4551 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On March 17, 2009, the Department
published the AD order on circular
welded austenitic stainless pressure
pipe from the PRC.1 On February 3,
2014, the Department published the
notice of initiation of the sunset review
of this AD order, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act.2 On February 14,
2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1),
the Department received a timely and
complete notice of intent to participate
in the sunset review of the order from
Bristol Metals LLC, Felker Brothers
Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless
Pipe, Inc. (collectively ‘‘Domestic
Producers’’). On March 4, 2014,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3),
Domestic Producers filed a timely and
adequate substantive response. The
Department did not receive substantive
responses from any respondent
interested party. As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of this AD
order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is circular welded austenitic
stainless pressure pipe not greater than
14 inches in outside diameter. This
merchandise includes, but is not limited
to, the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A–
778 specifications, or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications.
ASTM A–358 products are only
included when they are produced to
meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778
specifications, or comparable domestic
or foreign specifications. Excluded from
the scope are: (1) Welded stainless
mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–
554 or comparable domestic or foreign
specifications; (2) boiler, heat
exchanger, superheater, refining
furnace, feedwater heater, and
condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A–
249, ASTM A–688 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications; and
(3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM
A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally
classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005;
7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062,
7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). They may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015;
7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044,
7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in this sunset review is provided
in the accompanying I&D Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.3
The issues discussed in the I&D
Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins of
dumping likely to prevail if the order is
revoked. The I&D Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and to all parties in
the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the I&D Memorandum can be
accessed at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
I&D Memorandum and the electronic
version of the I&D Memorandum are
identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
The Department determines that
revocation of the AD order on circular
welded austenitic stainless pressure
pipe from the PRC would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and magnitude of the margins
of dumping likely to prevail are at the
following rates:
Weighted-average
margin
(percent)
Exporter and producer
Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd. Produced by: Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd ...............................................
PRC-Wide Entity—All Other Exporters and Producers ...........................................................................................................
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded
Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s
Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009)
(‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 6163 (February 3, 2014) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Jun 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
10.53
55.21
351.305. Timely written notification of
the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective orders is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
3 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless
Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’
from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with this notice (‘‘I&D Memorandum’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices
Dated: May 29, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–13433 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–955]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain
magnesia carbon bricks (MCBs) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC),
covering the period of review (POR)
January 1, 2012, through December 31,
2012. We preliminarily determine that
the application of adverse facts available
(AFA) to the sole mandatory
respondent, Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co.,
Ltd. of Haicheng City and Fengchi
Refractories Co., of Haicheng City
(collectively, Fengchi), and the
Government of the PRC (GOC), is
necessary because they failed to
cooperate to the best of their ability in
this proceeding. The Department also
preliminarily finds that certain
companies made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Steele, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4956.
AGENCY:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
includes certain MCBs. Certain MCBs
that are the subject of this order are
currently classifiable under the
following subheadings of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS): 6902.10.1000,
6902.10.5000, 66815.91.0000,
6815.99.2000, and 6815.99.4000.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Jun 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
description remains dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review of Certain Magnesia Carbon
Bricks from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Department’s Central
Records Unit, located in Room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be found at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
On December 13, 2013, the
Department received timely no
shipment certifications from RHI AG
and its affiliates: Liaoning RHI Jinding
Magnesia Co.; RHI Refractories (Dalian)
Co. Ltd.; RHI Refractories Liaoning Co.,
Ltd.; RHI Trading Shanghai Branch; and
RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
(collectively, the RHI Companies).1
Because there is no evidence on the
record to indicate that these companies
had sales of subject merchandise during
the POR, we preliminarily determine
that the RHI Companies had no
shipments during the POR. As a result,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the
Department intends to rescind the
review with respect to the RHI
Companies. However, the Department
finds that it is not appropriate to rescind
the review with respect to the RHI
1 See the December 13, 2013, Letter to the
Secretary, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from
China: Notice of No Sales.’’ In our Initiation Notice,
we stated that any company named in the notice of
initiation that had no exports, sales, or entries
during the POR must notify the Department within
60 days of publication of the notice in the Federal
Register. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 67104, 67104
(November 8, 2013) (Initiation Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32915
Companies at this time; instead,
consistent with our practice, the
Department will complete the review
with respect to the RHI Companies and
issue appropriate instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
based on the final results of the review.2
Information on the record shows that
Fengchi did have sales of subject
merchandise during the POR.3
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each subsidy
program under review, we preliminarily
determine there are countervailable
subsidies, i.e., that there is a
government-provided financial
contribution that gives rise to a benefit
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.4 In making these findings, we
relied on AFA for Fengchi, because it
did not act to the best of its ability to
respond to our request for information;
as such, we drew an adverse inference
in selecting among the facts available.5
With respect to the remaining
companies for which we initiated
reviews and that did not file noshipment certifications, we will assign
to entries made by these companies the
all-others rate from the investigation.
Accordingly, and consistent with
section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act, we
relied upon the all others rate from the
investigation because the rate calculated
for the sole mandatory respondent in
these preliminary results of review is
based entirely upon facts available. We
consider the use of the all others rate
from the investigation, which was based
upon a calculated rate for one of the
mandatory respondents in the
investigation, to be a ‘‘reasonable
method’’ for calculating the all others
rate because it represents the only rate
in the history of the countervailing duty
order on MCBs from the PRC that is not
zero, de minimis, or based entirely upon
facts available.6
2 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
(May 12, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal
From the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
56989 (September 17, 2010).
3 See the January 13, 2014, Memorandum to the
File, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
People’s Republic of China: Customs Data of U.S.
Imports of Magnesia Carbon Bricks.’’
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and, section 771(5A)
of the Act regarding specificity.
5 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
6 For a list of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, see Appendix I. For a full
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
Continued
09JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32913-32915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13433]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-930]
Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
[[Page 32914]]
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(``the Department'') finds that revocation of the antidumping (``AD'')
duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the margins of
dumping likely to prevail is indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset
Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: June 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca or Howard Smith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4551 or (202) 482-5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 17, 2009, the Department published the AD order on
circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC.\1\ On
February 3, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of
the sunset review of this AD order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act.\2\ On February 14, 2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1), the
Department received a timely and complete notice of intent to
participate in the sunset review of the order from Bristol Metals LLC,
Felker Brothers Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc.
(collectively ``Domestic Producers''). On March 4, 2014, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.218(d)(3), Domestic Producers filed a timely and adequate
substantive response. The Department did not receive substantive
responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this
AD order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic
Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People's Republic of China, 74 FR
11351 (March 17, 2009) (``Antidumping Duty Order'').
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 6163
(February 3, 2014) (``Sunset Initiation'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic
stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter.
This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or
comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A-358 products are
only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A-312 or ASTM A-778
specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications.
Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing,
meeting ASTM A-554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications;
(2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater
heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A-249, ASTM A-688 or
comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized
tubing, meeting ASTM A-269, ASTM A-270 or comparable domestic or
foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings
7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and
7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010;
7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and
7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only, the written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is
provided in the accompanying I&D Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by
this notice.\3\ The issues discussed in the I&D Memorandum include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude
of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the order is revoked.
The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). Access to IA
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
I&D Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed I&D Memorandum and the electronic version of the I&D
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded
Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People's Republic of
China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated
concurrently with this notice (``I&D Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Review
The Department determines that revocation of the AD order on
circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the PRC would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and
magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail are at the
following rates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter and producer margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd. Produced 10.53
by: Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd.......
PRC-Wide Entity--All Other Exporters and Producers 55.21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
[[Page 32915]]
Dated: May 29, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-13433 Filed 6-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
