Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 32757-32759 [2014-13192]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices
Partners, and Vendor Pass, Symmes
Township, Ohio.
At the request of a state workforce
official, the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. The workers were engaged in
activities related to the supply of
financial transaction processing.
New information shows that some
workers separated from employment at
the subject firm had their wages
reported under the former subject firm
name, Fifth Third Processing Solutions,
LLC.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
the subject firm who were adversely
affected by a shift in services to a
foreign country.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–83,298 is hereby issued as
follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘All workers of Vantiv, LLC, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Vantiv Holding, LLC,
Vantiv, Inc., including workers whose wages
were reported under Fifth Third Processing
Solutions, LLC, including on-site leased
workers from Adecco, Aerotek, Asendum,
Callibrity Solutions, LLC, Cardinal Solutions,
Centric, Cincinnati Bell Technology,
Cohesion, Experis, Footbridge, Illumination
Works, Ingage Partner, LLC, Kalvin
Consulting, K-Force, Lakeshore, Lucrum,
Mainline Information Systems, Inc.,
Manpower, Mergis Group, Messina, Midwest
Financial Staffing, Modis, Partner
Technology, Pomeroy, Precision Staffing
Services, LLC, Prosoft Technology, Resources
Global Professionals, Robert Half
International, SEI, Sogeti USA, Staffmark,
Superior Search & Staffing, TEKSystems,
Triple E Partners, and Vendor Pass, Symmes
Township, Ohio, who became totally or
partially separated from who became totally
or partially separated from employment on or
after December 16, 2012 through February 3,
2016, and all workers in the group threatened
with total or partial separation from
employment on date of certification through
two years from the date of certification, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.’’
Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of
May, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–13189 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Jun 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of May 19, 2014 through May 23,
2014.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production
by such workers’ firm or subdivision to
a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which
are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32757
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied for the
firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
32758
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices
date for all workers of such
determination.
None.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
85,053, Strippit, Inc. Akron, New York.
January 24, 2014.
85,079, Sierrapine, Ltd., Springfield,
Oregon. February 18, 2013.
85,108, Ameron International,
Etiwanda, California. February 28,
2013.
85,133, Weyerhaeuser Technology
Center, Boise, Idaho. March 10,
2013.
85,134, Weyerhaeuser, Federal Way,
Washington. March 10, 2013.
85,149, Sappi Fine Paper, Allentown,
Pennsylvania. March 13, 2013.
85,170, Graham Packaging Company
L.P. Berkeley, Missouri. March 15,
2013.
85,189, M/A–COM Technology
Solutions, Inc., Long Beach,
California. July 9, 2013.
85,225, Cycling Sports Group, Inc.,
Bedford, Pennsylvania. April 11,
2013.
85,238, Manitowoc FSG Operations,
LLC., Manitowoc, Wisconsin. April
11, 2013.
85,272, CES Group, LLC DBA Mammoth,
Inc., Holland, Michigan. April 28,
2013.
85,283, MTD Southwest, Inc., Tempe,
Arizona. May 2, 2013.
85,298, 3M Purification, Inc., Enfield,
Connecticut. May 8, 2013.
85,305, Honeywell International, Poway,
California. May 2, 2013.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
85,108A, Ameron International,
Fontana, California. February 28,
2013.
85,240, Quickparts.com, Lawrenceburg,
Tennessee. April 15, 2014.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:03 Jun 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
85,222, Air System Components, Inc.,
Ponca City, Oklahoma.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
85,208, Lockheed Martin Ship and Air
Services, Akron, Ohio.
85,121, Roseburg Forest Products
Company, Riddle, Oregon.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
85,155, DMI Edon, LLC., Edon, Ohio.
85,264, Cloud Cap Technology, Inc.,
Hood River, Oregon.
85,035, Hewlett Packard Company, Ft.
Collins, Colorado.
85,035A Hewlett Packard Company, Ft.
Collins, Colorado.
85,035B, Hewlett Packard Company, Ft.
Collins, Colorado.
85,035C, Hewlett Packard Company,
Boise, Idaho.
85,115, Hoax Films, LLC., Los Angeles,
California.
85,153, Staples Inc., Framingham,
Massachusetts.
85,232, Dex Media, Inc., Erie,
Pennsylvania.
85,237, Hyundia Regional Customer
Service Center, Charlotte, North
Carolina.
85,247, MoneyGram Payment Systems
Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.
85,250, Dell Marketing L.P. and Dell
USA LP, Round Rock, Texas.
85,251, Hewlett Packard Company,
Boise, Idaho.
85,251A, Hewlett Packard Company,
Boise, Idaho.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
85,251B, Hewlett Packard Company,
Boise, Idaho.
85,254, Sony Electronics, Inc., Carson,
California.
85,254A, Sony Electronics, Inc., Los
Angeles, California.
85,254B, Sony Electronics, Inc., Los
Angeles, California.
85,254C, Sony Electronics, Inc., San
Diego, California.
85,254D, Sony Electronics, Inc., San
Jose, California.
85,254E, Sony Electronics, Inc., Fort
Myers, Florida.
85,254F, Sony Electronics, Inc.,
Honolulu, Hawaii.
85,254G, Sony Electronics, Inc., Itasca,
Illinois.
85,254H, Sony Electronics, Inc.,
Bloomington, Minnesota.
85,254I, Sony Electronics, Inc., Park
Ridge, New Jersey.
85,254J, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo,
Texas.
85,254K, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo,
Texas.
85,254J, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo,
Texas.
85,254M, Sony Electronics, Inc.,
Middleton, Wisconsin.
85,269, International Flight Training
Academy Inc., Bakersfield,
California.
85,277, Aegis Media Americas, Boston,
Massachusetts.
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not
filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every
petition filed by workers must be signed
by at least three individuals of the
petitioning worker group. Petitioners
separated more than one year prior to
the date of the petition cannot be
covered under a certification of a
petition under Section 223(b), and
therefore, may not be part of a
petitioning worker group. For one or
more of these reasons, these petitions
were deemed invalid.
85,252, YP, LLC., Saint Louis, Missouri.
85,252A, YP, LLC., Southfield,
Michigan.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of May 19, 2014 through May 23, 2014. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site www.doleta.gov/
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
32759
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices
tradeact/taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the
searchable listing of determinations or by
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
May 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–13192 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than June 16, 2014.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than June 16, 2014.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC this 29th day of
May 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
[21 TAA Petitions instituted between 5/19/14 and 5/23/14]
TA–W
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
85313 .................
85314 .................
Supertex, Inc. (Company) ..............
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories (Union).
Souriau USA, Inc. (Company) .......
Honeywell (Union) ..........................
Child Care Services/Boaz Eagle
Corps Investments (Company).
EPIC Technologies, LLC (Company).
Maersk Agency USA Inc. (Company).
Teconnectivity/Tyco
Electronics
(State/One-Stop).
JP Morgan Chase (Workers) .........
Athena Health (Workers) ...............
Aviat Networks (Company) ............
ConAgra Foods (Workers) .............
Chrysler Group, LLC (Quality Engineering Center) (State/OneStop).
Media News/Bay Area Newsgroup
(Workers).
Eaton Interconnect (Company) ......
Chromcraft Revington, Inc (Company).
Caterpillar Inc. (Company) .............
Wiley X (State/One-Stop) ..............
Music Group Services Nevada
(Workers).
Stromgren Athletics Inc. (Company).
IQE (Workers) ................................
Sunnyvale, CA ............................................................
Detroit, MI ...................................................................
05/19/14
05/19/14
05/16/14
05/16/14
York, PA .....................................................................
Cincinnati, OH ............................................................
Courtland, MS ............................................................
05/19/14
05/19/14
05/20/14
05/16/14
05/16/14
05/19/14
Norwalk, OH ...............................................................
05/20/14
05/19/14
Madison, NJ ...............................................................
05/20/14
05/19/14
Wilsonville, OR ...........................................................
05/20/14
05/19/14
Florence, SC ..............................................................
Birmingham, AL ..........................................................
Santa Clara, CA .........................................................
Kentwood, MI .............................................................
Auburn Hills, MI ..........................................................
05/20/14
05/21/14
05/21/14
05/21/14
05/21/14
05/19/14
05/19/14
05/20/14
05/20/14
05/20/14
Walnut Creek, CA ......................................................
05/21/14
05/09/14
Chelsea, MA ...............................................................
Senatobia, MS ............................................................
05/22/14
05/22/14
05/21/14
05/21/14
Fountain Inn, SC ........................................................
Livermore, CA ............................................................
Las Vegas, NV ...........................................................
05/23/14
05/23/14
05/23/14
05/22/14
05/22/14
05/22/14
Hays, KS ....................................................................
05/23/14
05/22/14
Greensboro, NC .........................................................
05/23/14
05/15/14
85315 .................
85316 .................
85317 .................
85318 .................
85319 .................
85320 .................
85321
85322
85323
85324
85325
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
85326 .................
85327 .................
85328 .................
85329 .................
85330 .................
85331 .................
85332 .................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
85333 .................
Date of
institution
[FR Doc. 2014–13191 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:54 Jun 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Date of
petition
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32757-32759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13192]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of May 19,
2014 through May 23, 2014.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact
[[Page 32758]]
date for all workers of such determination.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
85,053, Strippit, Inc. Akron, New York. January 24, 2014.
85,079, Sierrapine, Ltd., Springfield, Oregon. February 18, 2013.
85,108, Ameron International, Etiwanda, California. February 28, 2013.
85,133, Weyerhaeuser Technology Center, Boise, Idaho. March 10, 2013.
85,134, Weyerhaeuser, Federal Way, Washington. March 10, 2013.
85,149, Sappi Fine Paper, Allentown, Pennsylvania. March 13, 2013.
85,170, Graham Packaging Company L.P. Berkeley, Missouri. March 15,
2013.
85,189, M/A-COM Technology Solutions, Inc., Long Beach, California.
July 9, 2013.
85,225, Cycling Sports Group, Inc., Bedford, Pennsylvania. April 11,
2013.
85,238, Manitowoc FSG Operations, LLC., Manitowoc, Wisconsin. April 11,
2013.
85,272, CES Group, LLC DBA Mammoth, Inc., Holland, Michigan. April 28,
2013.
85,283, MTD Southwest, Inc., Tempe, Arizona. May 2, 2013.
85,298, 3M Purification, Inc., Enfield, Connecticut. May 8, 2013.
85,305, Honeywell International, Poway, California. May 2, 2013.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
85,108A, Ameron International, Fontana, California. February 28, 2013.
85,240, Quickparts.com, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. April 15, 2014.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
85,222, Air System Components, Inc., Ponca City, Oklahoma.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
85,208, Lockheed Martin Ship and Air Services, Akron, Ohio.
85,121, Roseburg Forest Products Company, Riddle, Oregon.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
85,155, DMI Edon, LLC., Edon, Ohio.
85,264, Cloud Cap Technology, Inc., Hood River, Oregon.
85,035, Hewlett Packard Company, Ft. Collins, Colorado.
85,035A Hewlett Packard Company, Ft. Collins, Colorado.
85,035B, Hewlett Packard Company, Ft. Collins, Colorado.
85,035C, Hewlett Packard Company, Boise, Idaho.
85,115, Hoax Films, LLC., Los Angeles, California.
85,153, Staples Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts.
85,232, Dex Media, Inc., Erie, Pennsylvania.
85,237, Hyundia Regional Customer Service Center, Charlotte, North
Carolina.
85,247, MoneyGram Payment Systems Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.
85,250, Dell Marketing L.P. and Dell USA LP, Round Rock, Texas.
85,251, Hewlett Packard Company, Boise, Idaho.
85,251A, Hewlett Packard Company, Boise, Idaho.
85,251B, Hewlett Packard Company, Boise, Idaho.
85,254, Sony Electronics, Inc., Carson, California.
85,254A, Sony Electronics, Inc., Los Angeles, California.
85,254B, Sony Electronics, Inc., Los Angeles, California.
85,254C, Sony Electronics, Inc., San Diego, California.
85,254D, Sony Electronics, Inc., San Jose, California.
85,254E, Sony Electronics, Inc., Fort Myers, Florida.
85,254F, Sony Electronics, Inc., Honolulu, Hawaii.
85,254G, Sony Electronics, Inc., Itasca, Illinois.
85,254H, Sony Electronics, Inc., Bloomington, Minnesota.
85,254I, Sony Electronics, Inc., Park Ridge, New Jersey.
85,254J, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo, Texas.
85,254K, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo, Texas.
85,254J, Sony Electronics, Inc., Laredo, Texas.
85,254M, Sony Electronics, Inc., Middleton, Wisconsin.
85,269, International Flight Training Academy Inc., Bakersfield,
California.
85,277, Aegis Media Americas, Boston, Massachusetts.
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.
85,252, YP, LLC., Saint Louis, Missouri.
85,252A, YP, LLC., Southfield, Michigan.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of May 19, 2014 through May 23, 2014. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site
www.doleta.gov/
[[Page 32759]]
tradeact/taa/taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888-365-6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-13192 Filed 6-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
