Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Modify the Order Execution Algorithm of NASDAQ OMX PSX, 31147-31151 [2014-12527]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72250; File No. SR–Phlx–
2014–24]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Modify
the Order Execution Algorithm of
NASDAQ OMX PSX
May 23, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 13,
2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change on May 16, 2014.3
The Commission is publishing this
notice, as amended, to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the
order execution algorithm of Phlx’s
NASDAQ OMX PSX facility (‘‘PSX’’).
The text of the proposed rule change is
available at nasdaqomxphlx.
cchwallstreet.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange corrected
figures in both the filing and the proposed rule text
for price and share amounts used in examples of the
proposed execution algorithm.
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Phlx launched PSX in 2010 with an
order execution algorithm that allocated
executions of incoming orders to orders
on the PSX book based on the price and
size of posted orders, rather than price
and time, with allocations made on a
pro rata basis among orders with similar
price and display characteristics.4 In
2013, after concluding that this pro rata
model had not met the Exchange’s
expectations with respect to PSX’s
market share, Phlx adopted a price/time
model that was functionally similar to
the model in place at other national
securities exchanges.5 Phlx is now
proposing to allow its member
organizations to benefit from the
advantages of each model, by adopting
a system under which some securities
may trade using the current price/time
model, while others may trade under a
pro rata model similar to, but in several
respects different from, the model in
effect from 2010 to 2013. As described
in more detail below, Phlx will select
the algorithm applicable to each
security that is eligible for trading on
PSX, and may change the applicable
algorithm from time to time, subject to
providing advance notice to market
participants.6
Price/Time Algorithm
Phlx is not proposing to alter the
operation of the price/time algorithm for
those securities to which it is applied,
although it is modifying the applicable
rule text in certain respects to improve
its clarity. Under this algorithm, the
System executes trading interest in the
following manner:
• Price—Better priced trading interest
is executed ahead of inferior-priced
trading interest.
• Display—Displayed Quotes/Orders
at a particular price are executed in time
priority among such interest.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877
(September 9, 2010), 75 FR 56633 (September 16,
2010) (SR–Phlx–2010–79).
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452
(April 25, 2013), 78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR–
Phlx–2013–24).
6 The approach of allowing the applicable
execution algorithm to vary on a security-bysecurity basis is currently used in the market
structure of several options exchanges, including
the NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) (Chapter VI,
Section 10 of the NOM Rules); the BX Options
Market (‘‘BX Options’’) (Chapter VI, Section 10 of
the BX Options Rules); the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’) (CBOE Rule 43.1); and the C2
Options Exchange (‘‘C2’’) (C2 Rule 6.12). It was also
used in the cash equities markets at the former
CBOE Stock Exchange (‘‘CBXS’’) (CBSX Rule 52.1).
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31147
• Non-Displayed Interest—NonDisplayed Orders and the reserve
portion of Quotes and Reserve Orders
(collectively, ‘‘Non-Displayed Interest’’)
at a particular price are executed in time
priority among such interest.
For example, assume that sell orders
with the following sizes, time stamps,
and display characteristics are on the
PSX book:
• Order 1: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at
$9.99, 11:00.00
• Order 2: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at
$10.00, 10:59.50
• Order 3: 100 shares, Displayed at
$10.00, 11:00.05
• Order 4: 100 shares, Displayed at
$10.00, 11:00.10
• Order 5: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at
$10.00, 11:00.10
If an order to buy 400 shares at $10.00
is entered, it will execute against the
resting orders in the following sequence:
Order 1, since its price is superior to
that of the other orders; Order 3, since
as among orders priced at $10.00, it is
the Displayed Order that arrived on the
book first and Displayed Orders are
executed ahead of Non-Displayed
Interest; Order 4, since Displayed
Orders are executed ahead of NonDisplayed Interest, and Order 2, since
all Displayed Orders at $10.00 have
been executed and as among NonDisplayed Interest at $10.00, it was the
first to arrive on the book.
Pro Rata Algorithm
As noted above, the pro rata model is
being altered in several respects from
the version previously in effect. Most
notably, for those securities for which
the pro rata model is applicable, Phlx
may also opt to apply a version of the
algorithm under which a specified
percentage of an execution is guaranteed
to an order that establishes the best
price in PSX. This modification to the
algorithm is referred to herein and in
the proposed rule as the variation for
‘‘Price-Setting Orders.’’ As with the
decision as to the applicable algorithm,
Phlx will determine whether to apply
the variation to each security that trades
under the pro rata algorithm, and as
described in more detail below, may
change the application from time to
time, subject to providing advance
notice to market participants.
Price and Displayed Orders
Under the pro rata algorithm, the
System will execute trading interest
within the System in the following
order:
• Price—Better priced trading interest
is executed ahead of inferior-priced
trading interest.
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
31148
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Notices
• Display—Displayed Orders at a
particular price with a size of at least
one round lot will be executed ahead of
Displayed Orders with a size of less
than one round lot, Non-Displayed
Interest with a size of at least one round
lot, Minimum Quantity Orders, and
Non-Displayed Interest with a size of
less than one round lot.
• Allocation to Displayed Orders with
a Size of One Round Lot or More—
As among equally priced Displayed
Orders with a size of at least one
round lot, the System will allocate
portions of incoming executable
orders to displayed trading interest
within the System pro rata based on
the size of the Displayed Orders,
rounding down to the nearest round
lot. Next, portions of an order that
would be executed in a size other
than a round lot if they were
allocated on a pro rata basis will be
allocated for execution against
available displayed trading interest,
one round lot at a time, in the order
of the displayed size (measured at
the time when the pro rata
allocation began) of the trading
interest at that price (largest to
smallest), or, as among orders with
an equal size, based on time
priority. Incoming orders with a
size of less than one round lot will
be allocated against available
displayed trading interest in the
order of the size of trading interest
at that price (largest to smallest), or,
as among orders with an equal size,
based on time priority.
For example, assume that sell orders
with the following sizes, time stamps,
and display characteristics are on the
PSX book:
• Order 1: 600 shares, Displayed at
$10.00, 10:59.50
• Order 2: 400 shares, Displayed at
$10.00, 11:00.05
• Order 3: 300 shares, Displayed at
$10.00, 11:00.10
If an order to buy 1,200 shares at $10.00
is entered, it will execute against the
resting orders in the following sequence
and with the following share amounts:
• Orders 1, 2, and 3: The System will
make a pro rata allocation of the
incoming order to the resting orders
based on their size in round lot
increments, such that Order 1 will be
allocated 500 shares ((600 ÷ 1,300) ×
1,200, rounded down to the nearest
round lot); Order 2 will be allocated 300
shares; and Order 3 will be allocated
200 shares.
• Order 1: After decrementation, the
remaining orders on the book each have
100 shares, and the incoming order has
200 shares left to execute. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
remaining 200 shares of the order will
be allocated one round lot at a time, first
to Order 1, since of the remaining
resting orders, it was the order with the
largest displayed size at the beginning of
the pro rata allocation, and then to
Order 2, the order with the next largest
displayed size at the beginning of the
pro rata allocation.
If the incoming order was 80 shares (less
than one round lot), it would be
allocated to Order 1 based on its size as
the resting order with the largest
displayed size.
Variation for Price-Setting Orders
For any security that trades under the
pro rata algorithm, Phlx may adopt a
variation of the algorithm that
guarantees a specified percentage
allocation for an order that sets the best
price on PSX under certain conditions.
The goal of the variation would be to
increase the extent to which market
participants commit capital to display
significant size at a price that narrows
the spread, thereby enhancing price
discovery and transparency. The
‘‘Guaranteed Percentage’’ for all
securities subject to this variation will
be 40%.7 The Exchange believes the
Guaranteed Percentage of 40% strikes
an appropriate balance between
awarding the participant who sets a new
price on PSX while also rewarding other
participants who risk capital by
displaying large size, thereby
encouraging competition among market
participants to fill incoming orders. This
balance provides an incentive for
aggressive quoting from both a price and
size perspective.
When this variation of the pro rata
algorithm is employed, a Displayed
Order with a size of at least one round
lot that establishes the best price in PSX
when it is entered will be a ‘‘PriceSetting Order’’ if such order is executed;
provided, however, that a better priced
order will become the Price-Setting
Order if it is executed. The allocation to
the Price-Setting Order will be the
greater of the Guaranteed Percentage or
the allocation that the order would
otherwise receive under the pro rata
algorithm.
If the Price-Setting Order receives an
allocation greater than the Guaranteed
Percentage, the remainder of the order
will be allocated to other displayed
trading interest in the manner provided
for Displayed Orders when the variation
for Price-Setting Orders is not in effect
(as provided in Rule 3307(b)(2)(A)). If
the Price-Setting Order receives the
7 If Phlx determines to change the Guaranteed
Percentage, it will file a proposed rule change to do
so.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guaranteed Percentage, the System will
then allocate round lot portions of the
incoming order that are not allocated to
the Price-Setting Order to other
displayed trading interest within the
System pro rata based on the size of
such Displayed Orders (excluding the
Price-Setting Order), rounding down to
the nearest round lot. Next, portions of
an order that would be executed in a
size other than a round lot if they were
allocated on a pro rata basis will be
allocated for execution against available
displayed trading interest (excluding the
Price-Setting Order), one round lot at a
time, in the order of the displayed size
(measured at the time when the pro rata
allocation began) of the trading interest
at that price (largest to smallest), or, as
among orders with an equal size, based
on time priority. In the case of incoming
orders with a size of less than one round
lot, the Price-Setting Order will receive
the Guaranteed Percentage of the order,
and the remainder of the order will be
allocated to available displayed trading
interest in the order of the size of
displayed trading interest at that price
(largest to smallest), or, as among orders
with an equal size, based on time
priority.
By way of example, assume that Order
1 is on the PSX book to sell 1,000 shares
at $10.01. If Order 2 is then entered onto
the book to sell 1,000 shares at $10.00,
Order 2 is presumptively the PriceSetting Order. Assume also that Order 3
to sell 3,000 shares at $10.00, and Order
4 to sell 1,000 shares at $10.00 are then
entered onto the book. If an incoming
order to buy 1,000 at $10.00 is then
entered, 400 shares will be allocated to
Order 2 based on the 40% Guaranteed
Percentage for it as the Price-Setting
Order.8 The remaining shares will then
be allocated among the other orders
based on their displayed size as follows:
• Pro rata allocation of 400 shares to
Order 3 ((3,000 ÷ 4,000) × 600, rounded
down to the nearest round lot);
• Pro rata allocation of 100 shares to
Order 4 ((1,000 ÷ 4,000) × 600, rounded
down to the nearest round lot); and
• Remaining 100 shares to Order 3
(order with the largest original
displayed size).
If the incoming order was an odd lot of
80 shares, the System would allocate 32
shares to Order 2 (40% allocated to the
Price-Setting Order) and 48 shares to
8 If, before the incoming order was entered,
another sell order was posted to the book at $9.99,
it would have the potential to become the PriceSetting Order if it executed while still reflecting the
best price in PSX. Once an order is executed as a
Price-Setting Order, all previously entered orders
that could have potentially been Price-Setting
Orders are no longer eligible to be Price-Setting
Orders.
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Notices
Order 3 (resting order with the largest
displayed size).
As noted above, if the allocation that
a Price-Setting Order would receive via
the pro rata algorithm provided for in
Rule 3307(b)(2)(A) is greater than the
Guaranteed Percentage, the Price-Setting
Order would receive the higher
allocation and remaining shares of the
incoming order would be allocated as
provided for in Rule 3307(b)(2)(A). For
example, assume a Displayed Order to
sell 1,000 shares at $10.01 resides on the
PSX book (Order 1), a Displayed Order
to sell 3,000 shares at $10.00 is entered
and becomes the Price-Setting Order
(Order 2), and additional Displayed
Orders to sell at $10.00 with sizes of
1,000 shares (Order 3) and 1,000 shares
(Order 4) are then entered. If an
incoming order to buy 1,000 shares at
$10.00 is entered, the System will
allocate the incoming order as follow:
• 600 shares to Order 2 ((3,000 ÷
5,000) × 1,000, resulting in an allocation
in excess of the Guaranteed Percentage);
• 200 shares to Order 3 ((1,000 ÷
5,000) × 1,000); and
• 200 shares to Order 4 ((1,000 ÷
5,000) × 1,000).
Displayed Odd-Lot Orders
Following the processing of Displayed
Orders with a size of one round lot or
more, the System will allocate
remaining shares of an incoming order
among equally priced Displayed Orders
with a size of less than one round lot,
in the order of the size of the trading
interest at that price (largest to smallest),
or, as among orders with an equal size,
based on time priority.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Non-Displayed Interest With a Size of
One Round Lot or More
As among equally priced NonDisplayed Interest with a size of at least
one round lot (excluding Minimum
Quantity Orders), the System will
allocate portions of incoming executable
orders to Non-Displayed Interest within
the System pro rata based on the size of
Non-Displayed Interest, rounded down
to the nearest round lot. Next, portions
of an order that would be executed in
a size other than a round lot if they were
allocated on a pro rata basis will be
allocated for execution against available
Non-Displayed Interest, one round lot at
a time, in the order of the size
(measured at the time when the pro rata
allocation began) of the trading interest
at that price (largest to smallest), or, as
among orders with an equal size, based
on time priority. Incoming orders with
a size of less than one round lot will be
allocated against available NonDisplayed Interest in the order of the
size of trading interest at that price
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
(largest to smallest), or, as among orders
with an equal size, based on time
priority. Thus, the algorithm with
respect to Non-Displayed Interest with a
size of one round lot or more is identical
to the algorithm for Displayed Orders
with a size of one round lot or more.
Minimum Quantity Orders
Minimum Quantity Orders are orders
that will not execute unless a specified
minimum quantity of shares can be
obtained. Minimum Quantity Orders
that post to the PSX book are not
displayed, and upon entry must have a
size and a minimum quantity condition
of at least one round lot. In the event
that the shares remaining in the size of
the order following a partial execution
thereof are less than the minimum
quantity specified by the market
participant entering the order, the
minimum quantity value of the order is
reduced to the number of shares
remaining. Because they are nondisplayed, Minimum Quantity Orders
are given a lower priority of execution
than Displayed Orders. Moreover,
because a minimum quantity condition
cannot necessarily be satisfied in a pro
rata allocation system, the orders are
given a lower priority than other NonDisplayed Interest with a size of one
round lot or more. As among equally
priced Minimum Quantity Orders, the
System will allocate incoming
executable orders to Minimum Quantity
Orders within the System in the
ascending order of the size of the
minimum quantity conditions assigned
to the orders. Thus, an order with a
minimum quantity condition of 300
shares will be filled before an order with
a minimum quantity condition of 400
shares. If there are two or more
Minimum Quantity Orders with an
equal minimum quantity condition, the
System will determine the order of
execution based on time priority.
Non-Displayed Odd-Lot Orders
As among equally priced NonDisplayed Interest with a size of less
than one round lot, the System will
allocate incoming orders based on the
size of the Non-Displayed Interest, in
the order of the size of the trading
interest at that price (largest to smallest),
or, as among orders with an equal size,
based on time priority.
Selection of Applicable Algorithm and
Notice to Member Organizations
The algorithm applicable to a
particular security will be selected by
the Exchange and listed on a publicly
available Web site. The selection will be
made by the President of the Exchange
or another officer of the Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31149
designated by the President for this
purpose. The selection will be based on
an ongoing assessment of the depth of
liquidity made available by member
organizations in particular stocks, with
the goal of maximizing the displayed
size, minimizing the quoted spread, and
increasing the extent of PSX’s time at
the NBBO. Factors to be considered for
each security would include the size of
member organizations’ quotes, the
amount of time that PSX is at the NBBO,
PSX market share, and observed
changes in volume, average execution
size, and average order size. As a
general matter, the Exchange would
examine these factors and consider
adjusting the algorithm applicable to a
security if it concluded that
improvements in the security’s
performance on PSX might result. The
Exchange expects that immediately
following the implementation of this
proposed rule change, most if not all
securities will trade using the pro rata
algorithm with the Price-Setting Order
variation, with the goal of increasing the
size of displayed liquidity in PSX, but
that adjustments would then be made
based on the observed performance of
the securities. For example, if a security
trading under the Price-Setting Order
variation has large quoted size but PSX
is generally not at the NBBO in the
security, the Exchange would consider
moving the security to the price/time
algorithm as a means of encouraging
market participants to quote more
aggressively. Similarly, if PSX is
employing the price/time algorithm and
is at the NBBO consistently but with
smaller size than the exchange
considers ideal, the Exchange would
consider adopting the pro rata algorithm
with the variation for Price-Setting
Orders as a means of maintaining the
aggressive pricing from market
participants while also encouraging
larger quoted size, resulting in more
time at the NBBO for larger size. The
Exchange would also observe changes in
PSX’s market share and volume over
time to determine if the applicable
algorithm had a positive or negative
effect on these metrics. In particular
securities, the Exchange may also
observe average execution size and/or
average order size, with the goal of
increasing both metrics. The Exchange
may also conclude that if a group of
similar securities (for example, certain
exchange-traded funds) trade well using
a particular algorithm, other securities
with the same characteristics should
also trade under that algorithm. Changes
to the applicable algorithm, including
the applicability of the variation for
Price-Setting Orders, would be made
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
31150
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Notices
through a notice that is widely
disseminated at least one month in
advance of the change.9
2. Statutory Basis
Phlx believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 6 of the Act,10 in general, and
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 11 in
particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Phlx believes that the
proposal has the potential to enhance
the usefulness of PSX as a venue for
trading cash equity securities by
allowing the Exchange to adjust the
execution algorithm applicable to a
particular security to best suit its
characteristics. Moreover, each
component of the proposal—pro rata,
the variation for Price-Setting Orders,
and price/time—is itself consistent with
the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the use of the pro rata
algorithm is consistent with the Act
because it has the potential to encourage
member organizations to display orders
with greater size in order to receive a
larger share of executions. Thus, the
algorithm may facilitate transactions in
securities and perfect the mechanism of
a national market system by facilitating
executions of larger orders with less
impact on price. The proposal also has
the potential to promote price discovery
by providing a means to discourage the
use of non-displayed liquidity.
Moreover, the Commission has
previously determined that PSX’s prior
pro rata algorithm was consistent with
the Act because it ‘‘may encourage
participants, particularly those who
wish to execute orders of large size, to
display liquidity. . . This in turn could
facilitate the efficient execution of large
orders, and foster best execution and
price discovery. A novel exchange
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9 Based
on input from its affiliated options
exchanges that allow for similar variation of
execution algorithms, the Exchange believes that
even less notice would be adequate to allow market
participants to adjust their systems to reflect
changes. However, PSX is initially proposing one
month notice to avoid any possible issues after the
adoption of the new model. PSX may submit a
proposed rule change to reduce the time in the
future.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
priority system that is designed to
achieve these goals also may foster
competition and innovation.’’ 12 The
Exchange further notes that the use of
an algorithm that deemphasizes the
importance of speed would provide an
additional trading option to market
participants that may wish to seek
alternatives to the prevailing market
structure for US cash equities.
The proposed variation to the
algorithm for Price-Setting Orders is
similarly consistent with the national
market system purposes of the Act
because it maintains the potential
benefits of the pro rata algorithm
discussed above while also having the
potential to encourage market
participants to set the best price on PSX.
Thus, the Exchange believes that the
proposal has the potential to enhance
price discovery on PSX, while still
promoting competition among market
participants to receive allocations of
incoming orders by posting orders with
larger sizes.
In addition, the proposal is similar in
several respects to rules in effect at US
options exchanges. Notably, NOM and
several other options exchanges 13 have
rules that allow the applicable exchange
to determine the algorithm—pro rata or
price/time—applicable to each security
that it trades.14 In addition, the
proposed variation to the pro rata
algorithm for Price-Setting Orders is
similar in intent to rules of numerous
US options exchanges under which a
specialist is guaranteed a percentage
allocation of an incoming order in
consideration of its performance of
specialist obligations.15 Similarly, the
Exchange’s proposal is designed to
provide a means of encouraging market
participants to compete to provide
substantial liquidity at the inside market
by guaranteeing them a percentage
allocation. However, unlike the
guaranteed allocation for specialists, the
proposed allocation would be available
to any market participant quoting in a
security to which the variation
applied.16 Additionally, the proposal
12 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877
(September 9, 2010), 75 FR 56633, 56635
(September 16, 2010) (SR–Phlx–2010–79).
13 The former CBSX cash equities exchange,
which recently ceased operations, also had such a
rule.
14 See supra n.6. It should be noted that these
rules do not specify the factors to be considered by
the exchange in selecting the applicable algorithm.
The Exchange understands, however, that staff of
NOM and BX Options apply factors similar to the
ones proposed herein in making such selections.
15 See, e.g., PHLX Rule 1014(g).
16 The proposed rule is also similar to CBOE Rule
43.1 and former CBSX Rule 52.1, which provide
priority to the market participant that was first to
establish a price (the ‘‘Market Turner’’), and to
retain such priority in the event the market moves
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
could foster competition, as the
allocation would be awarded based on
performance. The trading participant’s
order that is given the Guaranteed
Percentage must compete with orders of
every other trading participant to earn
that Guaranteed Percentage.
Furthermore, one order earning the
Guaranteed Percentage carries no weight
as to whether another order for the same
participant earns the Guaranteed
Percentage; that is, each order must
compete to earn the Guaranteed
Percentage.
For securities that the Exchange
believes are not best served by a pro rata
allocation, the proposal allows the
Exchange to have the flexibility to use
a price/time algorithm that replicates
the algorithm in use at other national
securities exchanges. The Exchange is
not proposing to modify the operation of
this algorithm, which has also
previously been determined to be
consistent with the Act.17 This
algorithm is consistent with the
purposes of the Act because it reflects
a fair and logical means of allocating
executions based on the price, time of
entry, and display characteristics of
posted orders.
The Exchange further believes that the
process for determining the algorithm
applicable to a particular security is
consistent with the Act’s purposes of
perfecting the mechanisms of a national
market system and protecting investors
and the public interest. The rule allows
the Exchange to select among
alternatives, most aspects of which have
already been determined by the
Commission to be consistent with the
Act. Moreover, by allowing adjustments,
the rule will enable the Exchange to
continually evaluate data and adapt the
trading of securities to changing
circumstances, with the goals of
increasing displayed size and time at
the inside and narrowing spreads.
Finally, the Exchange believes that the
requirement to provide market
participants with at least one month
notice of any change will ensure that
market participants have adequate
notice of changes to enable them to
make any needed adjustments to their
order routing practices.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Phlx does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
beyond, but then returns to, the Market Turner’s
price.
17 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452
(April 25, 2013), 78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR–
Phlx–2013–24).
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
31151
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Notices
of the purposes of the Act, as
amended.18 Currently, PSX has minimal
market share, and the Exchange believes
that the proposal may enhance its
competitiveness by offering a unique
market model not currently offered by
other national securities exchanges
trading cash equities. Since use of PSX
is entirely voluntary and numerous
competitive alternatives exist, the
change will not impose any burden on
competition. Moreover, the Exchange’s
prior experience with use of a pro rata
algorithm on PSX leads it to believe that
although the market model may not
draw significant volume of order flow
away from other trading venues,
nevertheless the model is attractive to
some market participants and therefore
is likely to enhance PSX’s
competitiveness.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–24. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2014–24, and should be submitted on or
before June 20, 2014.
[Release No. 34–72244; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2014–056]
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–12527 Filed 5–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Extension of the Exchange’s Penny
Pilot Program and Replacement of
Penny Pilot Issues That Have Been
Delisted
May 23, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on May 20,
2014, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by NASDAQ. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ is filing with the
Commission a proposal to amend
Chapter VI, Section 5 (Minimum
Increments) of the rules of the NASDAQ
Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) to extend
through December 31, 2014, the Penny
Pilot Program in options classes in
certain issues (‘‘Penny Pilot’’ or ‘‘Pilot’’),
and to change the date when delisted
classes may be replaced in the Penny
Pilot.3
The Exchange requests that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay period to the extent needed for
timely industry-wide implementation of
the proposal.
The text of the amended Exchange
rule is set forth immediately below.
Proposed new language is underlined
and proposed deleted language is
[bracketed].
NASDAQ Stock Market Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2014–24 on the subject line.
Options Rules
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 May 29, 2014
19 17
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
*
*
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Penny Pilot was established in March 2008
and was last extended in December 2013. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57579 (March
28, 2008), 73 FR 18587 (April 4, 2008) (SR–
NASDAQ–2008–026) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness establishing Penny Pilot);
and 71105 (December 17, 2013), 78 FR 77530
(December 23, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–154)
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness
extending the Penny Pilot through June 30, 2014).
2 17
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
*
1 15
Paper Comments
18 15
*
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 104 (Friday, May 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31147-31151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12527]
[[Page 31147]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72250; File No. SR-Phlx-2014-24]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Modify
the Order Execution Algorithm of NASDAQ OMX PSX
May 23, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 13, 2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change on May 16, 2014.\3\ The Commission is
publishing this notice, as amended, to solicit comments on the proposed
rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange corrected figures in both
the filing and the proposed rule text for price and share amounts
used in examples of the proposed execution algorithm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the order execution algorithm of
Phlx's NASDAQ OMX PSX facility (``PSX''). The text of the proposed rule
change is available at nasdaqomxphlx. cchwallstreet.com, at the
Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Phlx launched PSX in 2010 with an order execution algorithm that
allocated executions of incoming orders to orders on the PSX book based
on the price and size of posted orders, rather than price and time,
with allocations made on a pro rata basis among orders with similar
price and display characteristics.\4\ In 2013, after concluding that
this pro rata model had not met the Exchange's expectations with
respect to PSX's market share, Phlx adopted a price/time model that was
functionally similar to the model in place at other national securities
exchanges.\5\ Phlx is now proposing to allow its member organizations
to benefit from the advantages of each model, by adopting a system
under which some securities may trade using the current price/time
model, while others may trade under a pro rata model similar to, but in
several respects different from, the model in effect from 2010 to 2013.
As described in more detail below, Phlx will select the algorithm
applicable to each security that is eligible for trading on PSX, and
may change the applicable algorithm from time to time, subject to
providing advance notice to market participants.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877 (September 9,
2010), 75 FR 56633 (September 16, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-79).
\5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452 (April 25, 2013),
78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR-Phlx-2013-24).
\6\ The approach of allowing the applicable execution algorithm
to vary on a security-by-security basis is currently used in the
market structure of several options exchanges, including the NASDAQ
Options Market (``NOM'') (Chapter VI, Section 10 of the NOM Rules);
the BX Options Market (``BX Options'') (Chapter VI, Section 10 of
the BX Options Rules); the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'')
(CBOE Rule 43.1); and the C2 Options Exchange (``C2'') (C2 Rule
6.12). It was also used in the cash equities markets at the former
CBOE Stock Exchange (``CBXS'') (CBSX Rule 52.1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Price/Time Algorithm
Phlx is not proposing to alter the operation of the price/time
algorithm for those securities to which it is applied, although it is
modifying the applicable rule text in certain respects to improve its
clarity. Under this algorithm, the System executes trading interest in
the following manner:
Price--Better priced trading interest is executed ahead of
inferior-priced trading interest.
Display--Displayed Quotes/Orders at a particular price are
executed in time priority among such interest.
Non-Displayed Interest--Non-Displayed Orders and the
reserve portion of Quotes and Reserve Orders (collectively, ``Non-
Displayed Interest'') at a particular price are executed in time
priority among such interest.
For example, assume that sell orders with the following sizes, time
stamps, and display characteristics are on the PSX book:
Order 1: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at $9.99, 11:00.00
Order 2: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at $10.00, 10:59.50
Order 3: 100 shares, Displayed at $10.00, 11:00.05
Order 4: 100 shares, Displayed at $10.00, 11:00.10
Order 5: 100 shares, Non-Displayed at $10.00, 11:00.10
If an order to buy 400 shares at $10.00 is entered, it will execute
against the resting orders in the following sequence: Order 1, since
its price is superior to that of the other orders; Order 3, since as
among orders priced at $10.00, it is the Displayed Order that arrived
on the book first and Displayed Orders are executed ahead of Non-
Displayed Interest; Order 4, since Displayed Orders are executed ahead
of Non-Displayed Interest, and Order 2, since all Displayed Orders at
$10.00 have been executed and as among Non-Displayed Interest at
$10.00, it was the first to arrive on the book.
Pro Rata Algorithm
As noted above, the pro rata model is being altered in several
respects from the version previously in effect. Most notably, for those
securities for which the pro rata model is applicable, Phlx may also
opt to apply a version of the algorithm under which a specified
percentage of an execution is guaranteed to an order that establishes
the best price in PSX. This modification to the algorithm is referred
to herein and in the proposed rule as the variation for ``Price-Setting
Orders.'' As with the decision as to the applicable algorithm, Phlx
will determine whether to apply the variation to each security that
trades under the pro rata algorithm, and as described in more detail
below, may change the application from time to time, subject to
providing advance notice to market participants.
Price and Displayed Orders
Under the pro rata algorithm, the System will execute trading
interest within the System in the following order:
Price--Better priced trading interest is executed ahead of
inferior-priced trading interest.
[[Page 31148]]
Display--Displayed Orders at a particular price with a
size of at least one round lot will be executed ahead of Displayed
Orders with a size of less than one round lot, Non-Displayed Interest
with a size of at least one round lot, Minimum Quantity Orders, and
Non-Displayed Interest with a size of less than one round lot.
Allocation to Displayed Orders with a Size of One Round
Lot or More--As among equally priced Displayed Orders with a size of at
least one round lot, the System will allocate portions of incoming
executable orders to displayed trading interest within the System pro
rata based on the size of the Displayed Orders, rounding down to the
nearest round lot. Next, portions of an order that would be executed in
a size other than a round lot if they were allocated on a pro rata
basis will be allocated for execution against available displayed
trading interest, one round lot at a time, in the order of the
displayed size (measured at the time when the pro rata allocation
began) of the trading interest at that price (largest to smallest), or,
as among orders with an equal size, based on time priority. Incoming
orders with a size of less than one round lot will be allocated against
available displayed trading interest in the order of the size of
trading interest at that price (largest to smallest), or, as among
orders with an equal size, based on time priority.
For example, assume that sell orders with the following sizes, time
stamps, and display characteristics are on the PSX book:
Order 1: 600 shares, Displayed at $10.00, 10:59.50
Order 2: 400 shares, Displayed at $10.00, 11:00.05
Order 3: 300 shares, Displayed at $10.00, 11:00.10
If an order to buy 1,200 shares at $10.00 is entered, it will execute
against the resting orders in the following sequence and with the
following share amounts:
Orders 1, 2, and 3: The System will make a pro rata
allocation of the incoming order to the resting orders based on their
size in round lot increments, such that Order 1 will be allocated 500
shares ((600 / 1,300) x 1,200, rounded down to the nearest round lot);
Order 2 will be allocated 300 shares; and Order 3 will be allocated 200
shares.
Order 1: After decrementation, the remaining orders on the
book each have 100 shares, and the incoming order has 200 shares left
to execute. The remaining 200 shares of the order will be allocated one
round lot at a time, first to Order 1, since of the remaining resting
orders, it was the order with the largest displayed size at the
beginning of the pro rata allocation, and then to Order 2, the order
with the next largest displayed size at the beginning of the pro rata
allocation.
If the incoming order was 80 shares (less than one round lot), it would
be allocated to Order 1 based on its size as the resting order with the
largest displayed size.
Variation for Price-Setting Orders
For any security that trades under the pro rata algorithm, Phlx may
adopt a variation of the algorithm that guarantees a specified
percentage allocation for an order that sets the best price on PSX
under certain conditions. The goal of the variation would be to
increase the extent to which market participants commit capital to
display significant size at a price that narrows the spread, thereby
enhancing price discovery and transparency. The ``Guaranteed
Percentage'' for all securities subject to this variation will be
40%.\7\ The Exchange believes the Guaranteed Percentage of 40% strikes
an appropriate balance between awarding the participant who sets a new
price on PSX while also rewarding other participants who risk capital
by displaying large size, thereby encouraging competition among market
participants to fill incoming orders. This balance provides an
incentive for aggressive quoting from both a price and size
perspective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ If Phlx determines to change the Guaranteed Percentage, it
will file a proposed rule change to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When this variation of the pro rata algorithm is employed, a
Displayed Order with a size of at least one round lot that establishes
the best price in PSX when it is entered will be a ``Price-Setting
Order'' if such order is executed; provided, however, that a better
priced order will become the Price-Setting Order if it is executed. The
allocation to the Price-Setting Order will be the greater of the
Guaranteed Percentage or the allocation that the order would otherwise
receive under the pro rata algorithm.
If the Price-Setting Order receives an allocation greater than the
Guaranteed Percentage, the remainder of the order will be allocated to
other displayed trading interest in the manner provided for Displayed
Orders when the variation for Price-Setting Orders is not in effect (as
provided in Rule 3307(b)(2)(A)). If the Price-Setting Order receives
the Guaranteed Percentage, the System will then allocate round lot
portions of the incoming order that are not allocated to the Price-
Setting Order to other displayed trading interest within the System pro
rata based on the size of such Displayed Orders (excluding the Price-
Setting Order), rounding down to the nearest round lot. Next, portions
of an order that would be executed in a size other than a round lot if
they were allocated on a pro rata basis will be allocated for execution
against available displayed trading interest (excluding the Price-
Setting Order), one round lot at a time, in the order of the displayed
size (measured at the time when the pro rata allocation began) of the
trading interest at that price (largest to smallest), or, as among
orders with an equal size, based on time priority. In the case of
incoming orders with a size of less than one round lot, the Price-
Setting Order will receive the Guaranteed Percentage of the order, and
the remainder of the order will be allocated to available displayed
trading interest in the order of the size of displayed trading interest
at that price (largest to smallest), or, as among orders with an equal
size, based on time priority.
By way of example, assume that Order 1 is on the PSX book to sell
1,000 shares at $10.01. If Order 2 is then entered onto the book to
sell 1,000 shares at $10.00, Order 2 is presumptively the Price-Setting
Order. Assume also that Order 3 to sell 3,000 shares at $10.00, and
Order 4 to sell 1,000 shares at $10.00 are then entered onto the book.
If an incoming order to buy 1,000 at $10.00 is then entered, 400 shares
will be allocated to Order 2 based on the 40% Guaranteed Percentage for
it as the Price-Setting Order.\8\ The remaining shares will then be
allocated among the other orders based on their displayed size as
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ If, before the incoming order was entered, another sell
order was posted to the book at $9.99, it would have the potential
to become the Price-Setting Order if it executed while still
reflecting the best price in PSX. Once an order is executed as a
Price-Setting Order, all previously entered orders that could have
potentially been Price-Setting Orders are no longer eligible to be
Price-Setting Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro rata allocation of 400 shares to Order 3 ((3,000 /
4,000) x 600, rounded down to the nearest round lot);
Pro rata allocation of 100 shares to Order 4 ((1,000 /
4,000) x 600, rounded down to the nearest round lot); and
Remaining 100 shares to Order 3 (order with the largest
original displayed size).
If the incoming order was an odd lot of 80 shares, the System would
allocate 32 shares to Order 2 (40% allocated to the Price-Setting
Order) and 48 shares to
[[Page 31149]]
Order 3 (resting order with the largest displayed size).
As noted above, if the allocation that a Price-Setting Order would
receive via the pro rata algorithm provided for in Rule 3307(b)(2)(A)
is greater than the Guaranteed Percentage, the Price-Setting Order
would receive the higher allocation and remaining shares of the
incoming order would be allocated as provided for in Rule
3307(b)(2)(A). For example, assume a Displayed Order to sell 1,000
shares at $10.01 resides on the PSX book (Order 1), a Displayed Order
to sell 3,000 shares at $10.00 is entered and becomes the Price-Setting
Order (Order 2), and additional Displayed Orders to sell at $10.00 with
sizes of 1,000 shares (Order 3) and 1,000 shares (Order 4) are then
entered. If an incoming order to buy 1,000 shares at $10.00 is entered,
the System will allocate the incoming order as follow:
600 shares to Order 2 ((3,000 / 5,000) x 1,000, resulting
in an allocation in excess of the Guaranteed Percentage);
200 shares to Order 3 ((1,000 / 5,000) x 1,000); and
200 shares to Order 4 ((1,000 / 5,000) x 1,000).
Displayed Odd-Lot Orders
Following the processing of Displayed Orders with a size of one round
lot or more, the System will allocate remaining shares of an incoming
order among equally priced Displayed Orders with a size of less than
one round lot, in the order of the size of the trading interest at that
price (largest to smallest), or, as among orders with an equal size,
based on time priority.
Non-Displayed Interest With a Size of One Round Lot or More
As among equally priced Non-Displayed Interest with a size of at
least one round lot (excluding Minimum Quantity Orders), the System
will allocate portions of incoming executable orders to Non-Displayed
Interest within the System pro rata based on the size of Non-Displayed
Interest, rounded down to the nearest round lot. Next, portions of an
order that would be executed in a size other than a round lot if they
were allocated on a pro rata basis will be allocated for execution
against available Non-Displayed Interest, one round lot at a time, in
the order of the size (measured at the time when the pro rata
allocation began) of the trading interest at that price (largest to
smallest), or, as among orders with an equal size, based on time
priority. Incoming orders with a size of less than one round lot will
be allocated against available Non-Displayed Interest in the order of
the size of trading interest at that price (largest to smallest), or,
as among orders with an equal size, based on time priority. Thus, the
algorithm with respect to Non-Displayed Interest with a size of one
round lot or more is identical to the algorithm for Displayed Orders
with a size of one round lot or more.
Minimum Quantity Orders
Minimum Quantity Orders are orders that will not execute unless a
specified minimum quantity of shares can be obtained. Minimum Quantity
Orders that post to the PSX book are not displayed, and upon entry must
have a size and a minimum quantity condition of at least one round lot.
In the event that the shares remaining in the size of the order
following a partial execution thereof are less than the minimum
quantity specified by the market participant entering the order, the
minimum quantity value of the order is reduced to the number of shares
remaining. Because they are non-displayed, Minimum Quantity Orders are
given a lower priority of execution than Displayed Orders. Moreover,
because a minimum quantity condition cannot necessarily be satisfied in
a pro rata allocation system, the orders are given a lower priority
than other Non-Displayed Interest with a size of one round lot or more.
As among equally priced Minimum Quantity Orders, the System will
allocate incoming executable orders to Minimum Quantity Orders within
the System in the ascending order of the size of the minimum quantity
conditions assigned to the orders. Thus, an order with a minimum
quantity condition of 300 shares will be filled before an order with a
minimum quantity condition of 400 shares. If there are two or more
Minimum Quantity Orders with an equal minimum quantity condition, the
System will determine the order of execution based on time priority.
Non-Displayed Odd-Lot Orders
As among equally priced Non-Displayed Interest with a size of less
than one round lot, the System will allocate incoming orders based on
the size of the Non-Displayed Interest, in the order of the size of the
trading interest at that price (largest to smallest), or, as among
orders with an equal size, based on time priority.
Selection of Applicable Algorithm and Notice to Member Organizations
The algorithm applicable to a particular security will be selected
by the Exchange and listed on a publicly available Web site. The
selection will be made by the President of the Exchange or another
officer of the Exchange designated by the President for this purpose.
The selection will be based on an ongoing assessment of the depth of
liquidity made available by member organizations in particular stocks,
with the goal of maximizing the displayed size, minimizing the quoted
spread, and increasing the extent of PSX's time at the NBBO. Factors to
be considered for each security would include the size of member
organizations' quotes, the amount of time that PSX is at the NBBO, PSX
market share, and observed changes in volume, average execution size,
and average order size. As a general matter, the Exchange would examine
these factors and consider adjusting the algorithm applicable to a
security if it concluded that improvements in the security's
performance on PSX might result. The Exchange expects that immediately
following the implementation of this proposed rule change, most if not
all securities will trade using the pro rata algorithm with the Price-
Setting Order variation, with the goal of increasing the size of
displayed liquidity in PSX, but that adjustments would then be made
based on the observed performance of the securities. For example, if a
security trading under the Price-Setting Order variation has large
quoted size but PSX is generally not at the NBBO in the security, the
Exchange would consider moving the security to the price/time algorithm
as a means of encouraging market participants to quote more
aggressively. Similarly, if PSX is employing the price/time algorithm
and is at the NBBO consistently but with smaller size than the exchange
considers ideal, the Exchange would consider adopting the pro rata
algorithm with the variation for Price-Setting Orders as a means of
maintaining the aggressive pricing from market participants while also
encouraging larger quoted size, resulting in more time at the NBBO for
larger size. The Exchange would also observe changes in PSX's market
share and volume over time to determine if the applicable algorithm had
a positive or negative effect on these metrics. In particular
securities, the Exchange may also observe average execution size and/or
average order size, with the goal of increasing both metrics. The
Exchange may also conclude that if a group of similar securities (for
example, certain exchange-traded funds) trade well using a particular
algorithm, other securities with the same characteristics should also
trade under that algorithm. Changes to the applicable algorithm,
including the applicability of the variation for Price-Setting Orders,
would be made
[[Page 31150]]
through a notice that is widely disseminated at least one month in
advance of the change.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Based on input from its affiliated options exchanges that
allow for similar variation of execution algorithms, the Exchange
believes that even less notice would be adequate to allow market
participants to adjust their systems to reflect changes. However,
PSX is initially proposing one month notice to avoid any possible
issues after the adoption of the new model. PSX may submit a
proposed rule change to reduce the time in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
Phlx believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Phlx believes that the
proposal has the potential to enhance the usefulness of PSX as a venue
for trading cash equity securities by allowing the Exchange to adjust
the execution algorithm applicable to a particular security to best
suit its characteristics. Moreover, each component of the proposal--pro
rata, the variation for Price-Setting Orders, and price/time--is itself
consistent with the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the
use of the pro rata algorithm is consistent with the Act because it has
the potential to encourage member organizations to display orders with
greater size in order to receive a larger share of executions. Thus,
the algorithm may facilitate transactions in securities and perfect the
mechanism of a national market system by facilitating executions of
larger orders with less impact on price. The proposal also has the
potential to promote price discovery by providing a means to discourage
the use of non-displayed liquidity. Moreover, the Commission has
previously determined that PSX's prior pro rata algorithm was
consistent with the Act because it ``may encourage participants,
particularly those who wish to execute orders of large size, to display
liquidity. . . This in turn could facilitate the efficient execution of
large orders, and foster best execution and price discovery. A novel
exchange priority system that is designed to achieve these goals also
may foster competition and innovation.'' \12\ The Exchange further
notes that the use of an algorithm that deemphasizes the importance of
speed would provide an additional trading option to market participants
that may wish to seek alternatives to the prevailing market structure
for US cash equities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\12\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877 (September 9,
2010), 75 FR 56633, 56635 (September 16, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-79).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed variation to the algorithm for Price-Setting Orders is
similarly consistent with the national market system purposes of the
Act because it maintains the potential benefits of the pro rata
algorithm discussed above while also having the potential to encourage
market participants to set the best price on PSX. Thus, the Exchange
believes that the proposal has the potential to enhance price discovery
on PSX, while still promoting competition among market participants to
receive allocations of incoming orders by posting orders with larger
sizes.
In addition, the proposal is similar in several respects to rules
in effect at US options exchanges. Notably, NOM and several other
options exchanges \13\ have rules that allow the applicable exchange to
determine the algorithm--pro rata or price/time--applicable to each
security that it trades.\14\ In addition, the proposed variation to the
pro rata algorithm for Price-Setting Orders is similar in intent to
rules of numerous US options exchanges under which a specialist is
guaranteed a percentage allocation of an incoming order in
consideration of its performance of specialist obligations.\15\
Similarly, the Exchange's proposal is designed to provide a means of
encouraging market participants to compete to provide substantial
liquidity at the inside market by guaranteeing them a percentage
allocation. However, unlike the guaranteed allocation for specialists,
the proposed allocation would be available to any market participant
quoting in a security to which the variation applied.\16\ Additionally,
the proposal could foster competition, as the allocation would be
awarded based on performance. The trading participant's order that is
given the Guaranteed Percentage must compete with orders of every other
trading participant to earn that Guaranteed Percentage. Furthermore,
one order earning the Guaranteed Percentage carries no weight as to
whether another order for the same participant earns the Guaranteed
Percentage; that is, each order must compete to earn the Guaranteed
Percentage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The former CBSX cash equities exchange, which recently
ceased operations, also had such a rule.
\14\ See supra n.6. It should be noted that these rules do not
specify the factors to be considered by the exchange in selecting
the applicable algorithm. The Exchange understands, however, that
staff of NOM and BX Options apply factors similar to the ones
proposed herein in making such selections.
\15\ See, e.g., PHLX Rule 1014(g).
\16\ The proposed rule is also similar to CBOE Rule 43.1 and
former CBSX Rule 52.1, which provide priority to the market
participant that was first to establish a price (the ``Market
Turner''), and to retain such priority in the event the market moves
beyond, but then returns to, the Market Turner's price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For securities that the Exchange believes are not best served by a
pro rata allocation, the proposal allows the Exchange to have the
flexibility to use a price/time algorithm that replicates the algorithm
in use at other national securities exchanges. The Exchange is not
proposing to modify the operation of this algorithm, which has also
previously been determined to be consistent with the Act.\17\ This
algorithm is consistent with the purposes of the Act because it
reflects a fair and logical means of allocating executions based on the
price, time of entry, and display characteristics of posted orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69452 (April 25, 2013),
78 FR 25512 (May 1, 2013) (SR-Phlx-2013-24).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes that the process for determining the
algorithm applicable to a particular security is consistent with the
Act's purposes of perfecting the mechanisms of a national market system
and protecting investors and the public interest. The rule allows the
Exchange to select among alternatives, most aspects of which have
already been determined by the Commission to be consistent with the
Act. Moreover, by allowing adjustments, the rule will enable the
Exchange to continually evaluate data and adapt the trading of
securities to changing circumstances, with the goals of increasing
displayed size and time at the inside and narrowing spreads. Finally,
the Exchange believes that the requirement to provide market
participants with at least one month notice of any change will ensure
that market participants have adequate notice of changes to enable them
to make any needed adjustments to their order routing practices.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Phlx does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance
[[Page 31151]]
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.\18\ Currently, PSX has minimal
market share, and the Exchange believes that the proposal may enhance
its competitiveness by offering a unique market model not currently
offered by other national securities exchanges trading cash equities.
Since use of PSX is entirely voluntary and numerous competitive
alternatives exist, the change will not impose any burden on
competition. Moreover, the Exchange's prior experience with use of a
pro rata algorithm on PSX leads it to believe that although the market
model may not draw significant volume of order flow away from other
trading venues, nevertheless the model is attractive to some market
participants and therefore is likely to enhance PSX's competitiveness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2014-24 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2014-24. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2014-24,
and should be submitted on or before June 20, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-12527 Filed 5-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P