Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 503, 30908-30911 [2014-12424]
Download as PDF
30908
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved. The
Exchange has provided the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed
rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2014–35 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–35. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2014–35 and should be submitted on or
before June 19, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–12425 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72228; File No. SR–MIAX–
2014–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rule 503
May 22, 2014.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on May 13, 2014, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend MIAX Rule 503 with respect to
the Opening Process in an option series.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/
wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 503 to change the definition of a
valid width NBBO and valid width
quote to correspond to the standard bidask differential specified under Rule
603(b)(4)(i). The Exchange’s current
methodology to start the Opening
Process is not conducive to a quick and
efficient opening on the Exchange. The
proposed rule change will amend the
current process to provide that the bidask differential to allow for the
Exchange System to start the Opening
Process based on the bid-ask
differentials specified in Rule
603(b)(4)(i), which are wider than the
bid-ask differential of Rule
603(b)(4)(ii).3 In addition, the Exchange
proposes some technical changes related
to the removal of the narrow-width
quote standard from Rule 603(b)(4)(ii),
as it would no longer be necessary once
the definition of a valid width NBBO
and valid width quote is updated to
correspond to Rule 603(b)(4)(i).
Current Opening Process
Currently, Rule 503 describes the
process pursuant to which the Exchange
System opens an option series. Pursuant
to the procedures described in Rule
503(e), after an initial pause following
the dissemination of a quote or trade in
the market for the underlying security,
the Opening Process starts with one of
the following events: (i) The Primary
Lead Market Maker’s valid width quote
has been submitted; (ii) the valid width
quotes of at least two Market Makers,
where at least one is a Lead Market
Maker have been submitted; or (iii) for
multiply listed option classes, at least
one Eligible Exchange (as defined in
Rule 1400(f)) has disseminated a quote
in the individual option in accordance
with Rule 1402(a), there is a valid width
NBBO available and the valid width
quote of at least one Lead Market Maker
3 For purposes of this filing, the quote width in
Rule 603(b)(4)(i) will be referred to as the
‘‘standard-width quote’’ and that of Rule
603(b)(40(ii) [sic] will be referred to as the ‘‘narrowwidth quote.’’
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
has been submitted.4 For the purposes
of Rule 503(e) both a valid width NBBO
and valid width quote is one where the
bid and offer differ by no more than the
differences outlined in Rule
603(b)(4)(ii), the narrow-width quote.5
Additionally, if after two minutes
following the dissemination of a quote
or trade in the market for the underlying
security none of the provisions
described above have occurred, then the
opening process can begin when one
Market Maker has submitted its valid
width quote.6 The Primary Lead Market
Maker assigned in a particular equity
option class must enter valid width
quotes not later than one minute
following the dissemination of a quote
or trade by the market for the
underlying security.7 A Registered
Market Maker that submits a quote
pursuant to this Rule 503 in any series
when a Lead Market Maker’s or Primary
Lead Market Maker’s quote has not been
submitted shall be required to submit
continuous, two-sided quotes in such
series until such time as a Lead Market
Maker submits his/her quote, after
which the Registered Market Maker that
submitted such quote shall be obligated
to submit quotations pursuant to Rule
604(e)(3).8
Once the Opening Process has been
started, the Exchange System will either
open with a quote or a trade. Rule
503(f)(1) provides the mechanism by
which the Exchange System will open
on a quote.9 Pursuant to Rule 503(f)(1),
the Exchange System, if there are no
quotes or orders that lock or cross each
other, will open by disseminating the
Exchange’s best bid and offer among
quotes and orders that exist in the
System at that time. The remainder of
Rule 503(f) provides how the Exchange
System operates when opening with a
trade—scenarios where there are quotes
or orders that lock or cross an order.
Rule 503(f)(2)–(11) provides the
mechanics of how the Exchange System
calculates the price of an opening trade
and handles any imbalance that may
occur.10 For purposes of opening with a
trade, Rule 503(f) utilizes the narrowwidth quote used to first start the
4 See
Rule 503(e).
Rule 603(b)(4)(ii). The bid-ask guidelines
specified in Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) that are required to
start the Opening Process are narrower than the $5
wide bid-ask differential for options traded after the
opening rotation. See also Rule 603(b)(4)(i). Rule
603(b)(4)(i) provides that options traded after the
opening rotation may be quoted with a difference
not to exceed $5 between the bid and offer
regardless of the price of the bid.
6 See Rule 503(e)(4).
7 See Rule 503(e)(5).
8 See Rule 503(e)(6).
9 See Rule 503(f)(1).
10 See Rule 503(f).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
30909
opens option series for trading after
receiving notification of an initial NBBO
disseminated by OPRA for the series or
Proposed Change to Opening Process
on a Market Maker quote, provided that
The Exchange proposes to amend
the bid-ask differential does not exceed
Rule 503(e)(2) and (3) to change the
its standard-width quote of $5 when not
definition of a valid width NBBO 11 and opening with a trade.13 On BOX, the
valid width quote 12 to correspond to the BOX system attempts to conduct an
standard bid-ask differential specified
opening match (similar to the
under Rule 603(b)(4)(i). As noted above, Exchange’s Opening Process) to
the Exchange currently uses the narrow- determine a single price at which a
width quote to define a valid width
particular option series will be
NBBO and valid width quote. The
opened.14 However, if the BOX system
Exchange proposes to replace references is not able to determine an opening
to Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) in Rule 503(e)(2)
price, the option series will nevertheless
and (3) with the standard-width quote of move from the ‘‘Pre-Opening Phase’’ to
Rule 603(b)(4)(i).
the continuous trading phase and the
Rule 603(b)(4)(i) provides that
option series will be open for trading.
options, following the opening rotation, When the option series move from Premay be quoted with a difference not to
Opening Phase to the continuous
exceed $5 between the bid and offer
trading phase, there is no requirement
regardless of the price of the bid. The
for a bid-ask differential to be met.
proposed change will align the
Market makers on BOX would only be
requirements to open the unopened
required to meet the $5 bid-ask
series on a quote with the existing
differential in the option series if and
Market Marker quoting requirements
when they ever decided to quote.15
following the opening rotation.
Similarly, NOM has no bid-ask
The Exchange believes that the
differential requirements to open a
application of the narrow-width quoting series if an ‘‘Opening Cross’’ (similar to
requirement of Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) to start Trading Auction) cannot be initiated
the Opening Process prevents series
because there are no opening quotes or
from opening promptly and thus
orders that lock or cross each other.16
unnecessarily delays the execution of
Specifically, if an Opening Cross cannot
orders on the Exchange. The Exchange
be initiated because there are no
believes that setting a wider quote
opening quotes or orders that lock or
differential requirement to start the
cross each other, the option series will
Opening Process would expedite the
open for trading on NOM.17 Market
opening of all options series on the
makers on NOM would only be required
Exchange promptly after the opening of
to meet the $5 bid-ask differentials in
the underlying security. The Exchange
the option series if and when they ever
believes that market participants will
decided to quote.18 Both, BOX and
benefit by having the ability to execute
NOM could open options series and
orders on the Exchange without
disseminate a protected quotation
unnecessary delay. In addition,
without the benefit of Market Maker
applying the standard-width quote bidquotation to facilitate price discovery.
ask differential to start the Opening
By contrast, currently, if the options
Process is consistent with the quoting
series does not meet the narrow-width
requirements that are applicable
quotes, the series will not start the
following the start of regular trading.
Opening Process and not open at all on
The Exchange further believes that
the Exchange, which differs from NYSE
applying the standard-width quote to
Arca, BOX and NOM. As noted above,
start the Opening Process is appropriate NYSE Arca requires a Market Maker
because it would more closely align the
quote that meets the standard-width
Exchange’s Rules with the rules of other requirement to open with a quote and
option exchanges with respect to
neither BOX nor NOM require any bidopening a series—specifically in the
ask differential to be met prior to
area of opening a series on a quote.
opening series for trading with a quote.
Other options exchanges have the
The current inability of the Exchange to
ability to open a series for trading when
there are no executable orders and/or
13 See NYSE Arca Rule 6.64(b)(E). See also
quotes to conduct an auction. BOX
Securities Exchange Release No. 68290 (November
26, 2012), 77 FR 71469 (November 30, 2012) (SR–
Options Exchange (‘‘BOX’’) and
NYSEArca-2012–126).
NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’),
14 See BOX Rule 7070(e).
allow for the opening of series without
15 See BOX Rule 7070(f). See also BOX Rule 8040,
conducting an opening auction. Similar which sets forth BOX market maker quoting
to the Exchange’s proposal, NYSE Arca
obligations.
Opening Process pursuant to Rule
503(e).
16 See
NOM Chapter VI, Section 8(c)(1).
id.
18 See NOM Chapter VII, Section 6(d).
11 See
Rule 503(e)(2).
12 See Rule 503(e)(3).
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
17 See
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
30910
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
open a series without quotes subject to
a narrow-width quote requirement puts
the Exchange at a competitive
disadvantage to other options exchanges
that do not have that similar restriction.
By not opening the option series, the
Exchange cannot display orders in the
Exchange System and thus has no
protected quotation in the options
series. Until the options series officially
opens for trading, the Exchange cannot
route out orders in the Exchange System
pursuant to Linkage, nor can it have a
protected quote that draws trading
interest from other options markets. The
Exchange believes that the delay in
execution of orders on the Exchange in
this situation is unnecessary and
harmful to market participants. The
Exchange’s proposal would provide for
the ability to open an option series on
a quote in a similar fashion as NYSE
Arca, BOX, and NOM. The Exchange
believes that having a bid-ask
differential requirement to open a series
is beneficial for opening series and
helps ensure there is a sufficient quoted
market in the options series, whether it
is via NBBO from OPRA or Market
Maker generated quote, prior to opening
of the series on the Exchange to
facilitate transactions in securities on
the Exchange.
Technical Changes
To clarify that the Exchange System
uses the standard-width quote standard
to start the Opening Process, the
Exchange proposes to delete Rule
603(b)(4)(ii). Related to the proposed
deletion of Rule 603(b)(4)(ii), the
Exchange further proposes replacing the
reference to Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) within
Rule 521 (Obvious and Catastrophic
Errors) with the specific bid-ask
differential contained in Rule
603(b)(4)(ii) so that Rule 521 will be
substantially unchanged and remain
operatively the same.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) 19 of the Act in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) 20 of the Act in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
19 15
20 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 May 28, 2014
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The proposed rule change is designed
to remove impediments to, and perfect
the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system
because it would permit the Exchange to
utilize the standard-width quote bid-ask
differential to start the Opening Process
which will expedite the opening of all
options series on the Exchange
promptly after the opening of the
underlying security, and thus remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market in
a way that benefits market participants
and enables them to execute their orders
on the Exchange.
The proposed rule change contributes
to the protection of investors and the
public interest by ensuring that if the
Exchange should open a series on a
quote the opening quote will be within
the standard bid-ask differential of Rule
603(b)(4)(i). The Exchange believes this
offers better protection than the
alternative of requiring no bid-ask
differential when opening an option
series on a quote.
The proposal would provide fair and
orderly means to open a series when the
Exchange does not have sufficient
executable quotes and/or orders to
conduct an Opening Process and would
reasonably ensure that the Exchange
does not open the series at a price that
is beyond the price at which Market
Makers are permitted to quote for the
series during the trading session, which
also contributes to the protection of
investors and the public interest,
generally. The proposed rule change is
also designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade because it
would permit the Exchange to open a
series in a manner that is more
consistent with the opening of
individual series on other option
exchanges.21
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed changes are designed to
facilitate the opening of series on the
Exchange in a manner that is fair,
orderly and more consistent with the
practice of other option exchanges.
Thus, the Exchange believes that the
filing is pro-competitive and should
increase intermarket and intramarket
competition for options transactions
21 See
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
supra notes 13, 14, and 16.
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
during and immediately after the
opening.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 22 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 23
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2014–18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
23 17
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2014–18. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2014–18, and should be submitted on or
before June 19, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–12424 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72230; File No. SR–CBOE–
2014–029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Enhance
the Exchange’s Audit Trail
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71859
(April 3, 2014), 79 FR 19697 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See CBOE Rule 6.70 defining a Floor Broker.
5 See CBOE Rule 7.12(a) defining a PAR Official.
6 See Notice, supra note 3, at 19697.
7 See id.
8 See id. at n. 4 (citing CBOE Rule 6.24).
9 See id. at 19698.
10 See id.
11 See id. at n. 5.
12 See id. at 19698.
2 17
I. Introduction
On March 27, 2014, the Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’),
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to require
Floor Brokers 4 and PAR Officials 5 to
electronically capture, by pressing a
‘‘Represent Button’’ on their trading
device, the time at which they initially
verbally present orders in the
Exchange’s trading crowd.6 The
Represent Button will be located on
PAR workstations and other Exchangeapproved devices used by Floor
Brokers.7
According to the Exchange, CBOE
Trading Permit Holders may use
Exchange-approved devices to
systematize 8 orders on the floor, but the
Exchange does not currently require
Floor Brokers and PAR Officials to
electronically capture the time when
orders are represented in the trading
crowd on these devices.9 The Exchange
states that the procedure Floor Brokers
and PAR Officials currently follow to
represent orders and consummate trades
on the Exchange’s trading floor will not
change aside from the added step of
capturing the time an order is initially
represented in the trading crowd by
pushing the Represent Button.10 The
Exchange also represents that any new
floor based order management device
will be required to have the Represent
Button functionality before CBOE will
approve it to be used on the Exchange
trading floor if it will be used to
represent orders on an agency basis.11
The Exchange believes that capturing
the time when orders are represented on
the Exchange’s trading floor will help
the Exchange develop and implement
surveillances concerning the Exchange’s
rules, including, but not limited to, due
diligence requirements of Floor Brokers
and Exchange priority rules.12
1 15
May 22, 2014.
24 17
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to enhance the
Exchange’s audit trail. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on April 9,
2014.3 The Commission received no
comment letters regarding the proposed
rule change. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30911
The Exchange proposes to announce
the implementation date of the
proposed rule change within 30 days
following approval by the Commission
and has represented to the Commission
that all devices currently used to
represent orders in the trading crowd by
Floor Brokers and PAR Officials will
have the Represent Button functionality
by the time of implementation.13
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.14 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,15 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
As described above, the Exchange
proposes to require that Floor Brokers
and PAR Officials press the Represent
Button to capture electronically the time
at which they initially represent an
order to the Exchange’s trading crowd.
The Commission notes that the
Exchange has represented that, aside
from this additional requirement, open
out-cry trading will generally continue
to operate as it currently does once this
proposed rule change is implemented.16
The Represent Button will be added to
devices already used by Floor Brokers
and PAR Officials on the Exchange floor
and represents an additional discrete
functionality to capture the time that an
order is represented. The Exchange also
represents that this new requirement
will apply equally to all participants
that handle agency orders in the trading
crowd.17 The Commission believes that
the proposed rule change represents an
incremental enhancement to CBOE’s
audit trail and should help facilitate
CBOE’s ability to monitor activity on its
trading floor and assess compliance
with its rules.
13 See
id.
approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 See Notice, supra note 3, at 19698.
17 See id.
14 In
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30908-30911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12424]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72228; File No. SR-MIAX-2014-18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 503
May 22, 2014.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on May 13, 2014, Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend MIAX Rule 503 with
respect to the Opening Process in an option series.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/wotitle/rule_filing, at
MIAX's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 503 to change the definition of
a valid width NBBO and valid width quote to correspond to the standard
bid-ask differential specified under Rule 603(b)(4)(i). The Exchange's
current methodology to start the Opening Process is not conducive to a
quick and efficient opening on the Exchange. The proposed rule change
will amend the current process to provide that the bid-ask differential
to allow for the Exchange System to start the Opening Process based on
the bid-ask differentials specified in Rule 603(b)(4)(i), which are
wider than the bid-ask differential of Rule 603(b)(4)(ii).\3\ In
addition, the Exchange proposes some technical changes related to the
removal of the narrow-width quote standard from Rule 603(b)(4)(ii), as
it would no longer be necessary once the definition of a valid width
NBBO and valid width quote is updated to correspond to Rule
603(b)(4)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For purposes of this filing, the quote width in Rule
603(b)(4)(i) will be referred to as the ``standard-width quote'' and
that of Rule 603(b)(40(ii) [sic] will be referred to as the
``narrow-width quote.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Opening Process
Currently, Rule 503 describes the process pursuant to which the
Exchange System opens an option series. Pursuant to the procedures
described in Rule 503(e), after an initial pause following the
dissemination of a quote or trade in the market for the underlying
security, the Opening Process starts with one of the following events:
(i) The Primary Lead Market Maker's valid width quote has been
submitted; (ii) the valid width quotes of at least two Market Makers,
where at least one is a Lead Market Maker have been submitted; or (iii)
for multiply listed option classes, at least one Eligible Exchange (as
defined in Rule 1400(f)) has disseminated a quote in the individual
option in accordance with Rule 1402(a), there is a valid width NBBO
available and the valid width quote of at least one Lead Market Maker
[[Page 30909]]
has been submitted.\4\ For the purposes of Rule 503(e) both a valid
width NBBO and valid width quote is one where the bid and offer differ
by no more than the differences outlined in Rule 603(b)(4)(ii), the
narrow-width quote.\5\ Additionally, if after two minutes following the
dissemination of a quote or trade in the market for the underlying
security none of the provisions described above have occurred, then the
opening process can begin when one Market Maker has submitted its valid
width quote.\6\ The Primary Lead Market Maker assigned in a particular
equity option class must enter valid width quotes not later than one
minute following the dissemination of a quote or trade by the market
for the underlying security.\7\ A Registered Market Maker that submits
a quote pursuant to this Rule 503 in any series when a Lead Market
Maker's or Primary Lead Market Maker's quote has not been submitted
shall be required to submit continuous, two-sided quotes in such series
until such time as a Lead Market Maker submits his/her quote, after
which the Registered Market Maker that submitted such quote shall be
obligated to submit quotations pursuant to Rule 604(e)(3).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Rule 503(e).
\5\ See Rule 603(b)(4)(ii). The bid-ask guidelines specified in
Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) that are required to start the Opening Process
are narrower than the $5 wide bid-ask differential for options
traded after the opening rotation. See also Rule 603(b)(4)(i). Rule
603(b)(4)(i) provides that options traded after the opening rotation
may be quoted with a difference not to exceed $5 between the bid and
offer regardless of the price of the bid.
\6\ See Rule 503(e)(4).
\7\ See Rule 503(e)(5).
\8\ See Rule 503(e)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the Opening Process has been started, the Exchange System will
either open with a quote or a trade. Rule 503(f)(1) provides the
mechanism by which the Exchange System will open on a quote.\9\
Pursuant to Rule 503(f)(1), the Exchange System, if there are no quotes
or orders that lock or cross each other, will open by disseminating the
Exchange's best bid and offer among quotes and orders that exist in the
System at that time. The remainder of Rule 503(f) provides how the
Exchange System operates when opening with a trade--scenarios where
there are quotes or orders that lock or cross an order. Rule 503(f)(2)-
(11) provides the mechanics of how the Exchange System calculates the
price of an opening trade and handles any imbalance that may occur.\10\
For purposes of opening with a trade, Rule 503(f) utilizes the narrow-
width quote used to first start the Opening Process pursuant to Rule
503(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 503(f)(1).
\10\ See Rule 503(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Change to Opening Process
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 503(e)(2) and (3) to change the
definition of a valid width NBBO \11\ and valid width quote \12\ to
correspond to the standard bid-ask differential specified under Rule
603(b)(4)(i). As noted above, the Exchange currently uses the narrow-
width quote to define a valid width NBBO and valid width quote. The
Exchange proposes to replace references to Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) in Rule
503(e)(2) and (3) with the standard-width quote of Rule 603(b)(4)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Rule 503(e)(2).
\12\ See Rule 503(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 603(b)(4)(i) provides that options, following the opening
rotation, may be quoted with a difference not to exceed $5 between the
bid and offer regardless of the price of the bid. The proposed change
will align the requirements to open the unopened series on a quote with
the existing Market Marker quoting requirements following the opening
rotation.
The Exchange believes that the application of the narrow-width
quoting requirement of Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) to start the Opening Process
prevents series from opening promptly and thus unnecessarily delays the
execution of orders on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that setting
a wider quote differential requirement to start the Opening Process
would expedite the opening of all options series on the Exchange
promptly after the opening of the underlying security. The Exchange
believes that market participants will benefit by having the ability to
execute orders on the Exchange without unnecessary delay. In addition,
applying the standard-width quote bid-ask differential to start the
Opening Process is consistent with the quoting requirements that are
applicable following the start of regular trading.
The Exchange further believes that applying the standard-width
quote to start the Opening Process is appropriate because it would more
closely align the Exchange's Rules with the rules of other option
exchanges with respect to opening a series--specifically in the area of
opening a series on a quote. Other options exchanges have the ability
to open a series for trading when there are no executable orders and/or
quotes to conduct an auction. BOX Options Exchange (``BOX'') and NASDAQ
Options Market (``NOM''), allow for the opening of series without
conducting an opening auction. Similar to the Exchange's proposal, NYSE
Arca opens option series for trading after receiving notification of an
initial NBBO disseminated by OPRA for the series or on a Market Maker
quote, provided that the bid-ask differential does not exceed its
standard-width quote of $5 when not opening with a trade.\13\ On BOX,
the BOX system attempts to conduct an opening match (similar to the
Exchange's Opening Process) to determine a single price at which a
particular option series will be opened.\14\ However, if the BOX system
is not able to determine an opening price, the option series will
nevertheless move from the ``Pre-Opening Phase'' to the continuous
trading phase and the option series will be open for trading. When the
option series move from Pre-Opening Phase to the continuous trading
phase, there is no requirement for a bid-ask differential to be met.
Market makers on BOX would only be required to meet the $5 bid-ask
differential in the option series if and when they ever decided to
quote.\15\ Similarly, NOM has no bid-ask differential requirements to
open a series if an ``Opening Cross'' (similar to Trading Auction)
cannot be initiated because there are no opening quotes or orders that
lock or cross each other.\16\ Specifically, if an Opening Cross cannot
be initiated because there are no opening quotes or orders that lock or
cross each other, the option series will open for trading on NOM.\17\
Market makers on NOM would only be required to meet the $5 bid-ask
differentials in the option series if and when they ever decided to
quote.\18\ Both, BOX and NOM could open options series and disseminate
a protected quotation without the benefit of Market Maker quotation to
facilitate price discovery.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See NYSE Arca Rule 6.64(b)(E). See also Securities Exchange
Release No. 68290 (November 26, 2012), 77 FR 71469 (November 30,
2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-126).
\14\ See BOX Rule 7070(e).
\15\ See BOX Rule 7070(f). See also BOX Rule 8040, which sets
forth BOX market maker quoting obligations.
\16\ See NOM Chapter VI, Section 8(c)(1).
\17\ See id.
\18\ See NOM Chapter VII, Section 6(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By contrast, currently, if the options series does not meet the
narrow-width quotes, the series will not start the Opening Process and
not open at all on the Exchange, which differs from NYSE Arca, BOX and
NOM. As noted above, NYSE Arca requires a Market Maker quote that meets
the standard-width requirement to open with a quote and neither BOX nor
NOM require any bid-ask differential to be met prior to opening series
for trading with a quote. The current inability of the Exchange to
[[Page 30910]]
open a series without quotes subject to a narrow-width quote
requirement puts the Exchange at a competitive disadvantage to other
options exchanges that do not have that similar restriction. By not
opening the option series, the Exchange cannot display orders in the
Exchange System and thus has no protected quotation in the options
series. Until the options series officially opens for trading, the
Exchange cannot route out orders in the Exchange System pursuant to
Linkage, nor can it have a protected quote that draws trading interest
from other options markets. The Exchange believes that the delay in
execution of orders on the Exchange in this situation is unnecessary
and harmful to market participants. The Exchange's proposal would
provide for the ability to open an option series on a quote in a
similar fashion as NYSE Arca, BOX, and NOM. The Exchange believes that
having a bid-ask differential requirement to open a series is
beneficial for opening series and helps ensure there is a sufficient
quoted market in the options series, whether it is via NBBO from OPRA
or Market Maker generated quote, prior to opening of the series on the
Exchange to facilitate transactions in securities on the Exchange.
Technical Changes
To clarify that the Exchange System uses the standard-width quote
standard to start the Opening Process, the Exchange proposes to delete
Rule 603(b)(4)(ii). Related to the proposed deletion of Rule
603(b)(4)(ii), the Exchange further proposes replacing the reference to
Rule 603(b)(4)(ii) within Rule 521 (Obvious and Catastrophic Errors)
with the specific bid-ask differential contained in Rule 603(b)(4)(ii)
so that Rule 521 will be substantially unchanged and remain operatively
the same.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) \19\ of the Act in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \20\ of the Act in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change is designed to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market
system because it would permit the Exchange to utilize the standard-
width quote bid-ask differential to start the Opening Process which
will expedite the opening of all options series on the Exchange
promptly after the opening of the underlying security, and thus remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market in a
way that benefits market participants and enables them to execute their
orders on the Exchange.
The proposed rule change contributes to the protection of investors
and the public interest by ensuring that if the Exchange should open a
series on a quote the opening quote will be within the standard bid-ask
differential of Rule 603(b)(4)(i). The Exchange believes this offers
better protection than the alternative of requiring no bid-ask
differential when opening an option series on a quote.
The proposal would provide fair and orderly means to open a series
when the Exchange does not have sufficient executable quotes and/or
orders to conduct an Opening Process and would reasonably ensure that
the Exchange does not open the series at a price that is beyond the
price at which Market Makers are permitted to quote for the series
during the trading session, which also contributes to the protection of
investors and the public interest, generally. The proposed rule change
is also designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade
because it would permit the Exchange to open a series in a manner that
is more consistent with the opening of individual series on other
option exchanges.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See supra notes 13, 14, and 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes are
designed to facilitate the opening of series on the Exchange in a
manner that is fair, orderly and more consistent with the practice of
other option exchanges. Thus, the Exchange believes that the filing is
pro-competitive and should increase intermarket and intramarket
competition for options transactions during and immediately after the
opening.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \23\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2014-18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
[[Page 30911]]
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-18. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-18, and should be
submitted on or before June 19, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-12424 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P