Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, 30877-30878 [2014-12409]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
floating WindFloat units, each equipped
with a 6–MW offshore wind turbine.
Each unit would be moored with
multiple anchors to the seafloor, and be
connected to a single transmission cable
running along the seafloor to shore.
Additional information on Principle
Power’s unsolicited lease request and
maps of the proposed lease site can be
viewed at https://www.boem.gov/StateActivities-Oregon/.
On September 30, 2013, we published
a notice of the unsolicited lease request
and a Request for Interest (RFI) to
determine whether anyone had an
interest in acquiring a commercial wind
lease in the area identified by Principle
Power (78 FR 59969). The notice also
provided the opportunity for interested
stakeholders to comment on the
proposed lease area, the proposed
project and potential impacts wind
energy development may have on the
area.
No indications of competitive interest
were received in response to the notice,
and BOEM published a Determination
of No Competitive Interest on February
6, 2014 (79 FR 7225). Stakeholder
comments received in response to the
RFI are being considered during our
scoping process.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Purpose and Need for Agency Action
BOEM will process Principle Power’s
unsolicited lease request under the
provisions at 30 CFR Part 585,
Renewable Energy and Alternate Uses of
Existing Facilities on the Outer
Continental Shelf. These regulations
provide for lease issuance and approval
of plans for construction and operation
of renewable energy facilities.
3. Proposed Action and Scope of
Analysis
BOEM’s proposed action is the
issuance of a commercial lease and the
approval of a construction and
operation plan for the WindFloat Pacific
Project. The EA will consider the
reasonably foreseeable environmental
consequences associated with the
proposed action, including the impacts
of the construction, operation,
maintenance and decommissioning of
wind turbines and cables.
This notice is intended to further
engage the public in the scoping process
for this EA. We are soliciting
information regarding important
environmental issues and alternatives
that should be considered in the EA.
Alternatives currently under
consideration include the proposal
submitted by Principle Power and a noaction alternative. Environmental
resources we expect to evaluate in the
EA include benthic invertebrates, fish,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:49 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
birds, bats and marine mammals. We
will also consider other human uses in
the vicinity of the proposed project,
including commercial and sport fishing,
recreation and vessel traffic.
If at any time during preparation of
the EA we determine that an
environmental impact statement (EIS) is
needed, we will issue a Notice of Intent
(NOI) to prepare an EIS in the Federal
Register. In that case, scoping comments
you submit now will be considered for
the development of an EIS.
4. Other Environmental Review and
Consultation Processes
BOEM will also use responses to this
notice and the EA public involvement
process to satisfy the public
involvement requirements of the
National Historic Preservation Act (16
U.S.C. 470f), as provided in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3). We are seeking information
from the public on the identification of
historic properties that may be affected
by the WindFloat Pacific Project. The
analyses contained within the EA also
will support compliance with other
environmental statutes (e.g., Endangered
Species Act, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Marine
Mammal Protection Act).
5. Cooperating Agencies
It is BOEM’s intent to prepare an EA
that will inform all Federal decisions
related to Principle Power’s proposal,
and we invite Federal, state and local
government agencies to consider
becoming cooperating agencies in the
preparation of this EA. Council on
Environmental Quality regulations
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA define cooperating agencies as
those with ‘‘jurisdiction by law or
special expertise’’ (40 CFR 1508.5).
Potential cooperating agencies should
consider their authority and capacity to
assume the responsibilities of a
cooperating agency and remember that
an agency’s role in the environmental
analysis neither enlarges nor diminishes
the final decision-making authority of
any other agency involved in the NEPA
process.
Even if an organization is not a
cooperating agency, opportunities will
exist to provide information and
comments to BOEM during the normal
public involvement phases of the NEPA
process.
6. Comments
Federal, state, local government
agencies, tribal governments and other
interested parties are requested to send
written comments on the important
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30877
issues to be considered in the EA by any
of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. In the field
entitled ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter
BOEM–2014–0050, and then click
‘‘search.’’ Follow the instructions to
submit public comments and view
supporting and related materials
available for this notice;
2. By U.S. Postal Service or other
delivery service, send your comments
and information to the following
address: Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Pacific OCS Region,
Attention: Greg Sanders, Office of
Environment, 770 Paseo Camarillo, 2nd
Floor, Camarillo, California 93010; or
3. In person at one of the EA public
scoping meetings.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information may be
made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comments
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: May 14, 2014.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–12066 Filed 5–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–454 and 731–
TA–1144 (Review)]
Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe
from China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order and
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on welded stainless steel pressure
pipe from China would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
30878
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Notices
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vincent Honnold (202–205–3314),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 9, 2014, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (79
FR 6163, February 3, 2014) of the
subject five-year reviews was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on June
9, 2014, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has the authority to toll
statutory deadlines during a period when the
government is closed. Because the Commission was
closed on February 13, 2014; March 3, 2014; and
March 17, 2014 due to inclement weather in
Washington, DC, the statutory deadline may be
tolled by up to three days.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Bristol Metals, Felker Brothers, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
June 12, 2014 and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year reviews
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by June 12, 2014.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov,
elaborates upon the Commission’s rules
with respect to electronic filing.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 22, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–12409 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–859]
Certain Integrated Circuit Chips and
Products Containing the Same
Commission’s Determination To
Review in Part the Final Initial
Determination; Request for
Submissions
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
Outokumpu Stainless Pipe to be individually
adequate. Comments from other interested parties
will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part the final initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on
March 21, 2014, finding no violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this
investigation.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2737. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on October 23, 2012, based on a
complaint filed by Realtek
Semiconductor Corporation (‘‘Realtek’’)
of Hsinchu, Taiwan alleging violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337), as amended, by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 6,787,928 (‘‘the ’928
patent’’) and 6,963,226 (‘‘the ’226
patent’’). 77 FR 64826. The notice of
investigation named as respondents LSI
Corporation of Milpitas, California; and
Seagate Technology of Cupertino,
California (collectively ‘‘Respondents’’).
The ’226 patent was terminated from the
investigation.
On March 21, 2014, the ALJ issued
the subject final ID finding no violation
of section 337. The ALJ held that no
violation occurred in the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain integrated circuit chips and
products containing the same that
infringe one or more of claims 1–10 of
the ’928 patent. Although the ALJ found
that the asserted claims were infringed,
the ALJ held claims 1–10 of the ’928
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30877-30878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12409]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-454 and 731-TA-1144 (Review)]
Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the countervailing duty order and revocation of the antidumping duty
order on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and
[[Page 30878]]
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vincent Honnold (202-205-3314), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On May 9, 2014, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(79 FR 6163, February 3, 2014) of the subject five-year reviews was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
\2\ The Commission has the authority to toll statutory deadlines
during a period when the government is closed. Because the
Commission was closed on February 13, 2014; March 3, 2014; and March
17, 2014 due to inclement weather in Washington, DC, the statutory
deadline may be tolled by up to three days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
June 9, 2014, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\3\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before June 12, 2014 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the
review by June 12, 2014. However, should the Department of Commerce
extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission's Web
site at https://edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission's rules
with respect to electronic filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Bristol
Metals, Felker Brothers, and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe to be
individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will
not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 22, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-12409 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P