The University of Memphis, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 29168 [2014-11788]

Download as PDF 29168 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Notices an administrative review of this antidumping duty order. As a result, we are rescinding the administrative review of CVP–23 from the PRC for the period December 1, 2012 through November 30, 2013. Dated: May 15, 2014. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2014–11815 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because the Department is rescinding this review in its entirety, the entries to which this administrative review pertained shall be assessed antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). business day, or Monday, May 5, 2014, to withdraw their request for review. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:42 May 20, 2014 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration The University of Memphis, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 13–050. Applicant: The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152–3370. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542, February 4, 2014. Docket Number: 13–051. Applicant: The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542, February 4, 2014. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each instrument. Dated: May 15, 2014. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration University of Minnesota; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 14–002. Applicant: University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. Instrument: Anaerobic glovebox for crystallography. Manufacturer: Belle Technology UK Ltd., Great Britain. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 11759–60, March 3, 2014. Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order. Reasons: The instrument will be used to study the growth of crystals of oxygensensitive proteins and trapping of catalytic intermediates in crystals of enzymes which utilize oxygen as a substrate. The objective is to produce atomic resolution molecular structures of oxygen-sensitive or oxygendependent proteins by x-ray crystallography. The necessary features of this instrument include an entry port in the floor of the microscope box that forms an air-tight seal with a two liter liquid nitrogen dewar mated to the port from outside the box. Air needs to be expelled (purged) from above the liquid nitrogen surface and replaced with gaseous nitrogen. Closure of the port allows removal of the dewar. An airtight door between the larger anaerobic crystallization box and the anaerobic microscope box is also necessary. Dated: May 13, 2014. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–11784 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [FR Doc. 2014–11788 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 98 (Wednesday, May 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 29168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The University of Memphis, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 
p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

    Docket Number: 13-050. Applicant: The University of Memphis, 
Memphis, TN 38152-3370. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542, 
February 4, 2014.

    Docket Number: 13-051. Applicant: The Scripps Research Institute, 
La Jolla, CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 
79 FR 6542, February 4, 2014.

    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: May 15, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-11788 Filed 5-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P