The University of Memphis, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 29168 [2014-11788]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29168
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Notices
an administrative review of this
antidumping duty order. As a result, we
are rescinding the administrative review
of CVP–23 from the PRC for the period
December 1, 2012 through November
30, 2013.
Dated: May 15, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–11815 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Because the
Department is rescinding this review in
its entirety, the entries to which this
administrative review pertained shall be
assessed antidumping duties at rates
equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication of this notice.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
business day, or Monday, May 5, 2014, to withdraw
their request for review. See Notice of Clarification:
Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533
(May 10, 2005).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
The University of Memphis, et al.;
Notice of Consolidated Decision on
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of
Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC.
Docket Number: 13–050. Applicant:
The University of Memphis, Memphis,
TN 38152–3370. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542, February
4, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–051. Applicant:
The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla,
CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542, February
4, 2014.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as this
instrument is intended to be used, is
being manufactured in the United States
at the time the instrument was ordered.
Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an
electron microscope and is intended for
research or scientific educational uses
requiring an electron microscope. We
know of no electron microscope, or any
other instrument suited to these
purposes, which was being
manufactured in the United States at the
time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 15, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Enforcement and Compliance.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Minnesota; Notice of
Decision on Application for Duty-Free
Entry of Scientific Instruments
This is a decision pursuant to Section
6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Materials Importation Act of
1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by
Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in
Room 3720, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 14–002. Applicant:
University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
55108. Instrument: Anaerobic glovebox
for crystallography. Manufacturer: Belle
Technology UK Ltd., Great Britain.
Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR
11759–60, March 3, 2014. Comments:
None received. Decision: Approved. We
know of no instruments of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as this is intended to be used,
that was being manufactured in the
United States at the time of order.
Reasons: The instrument will be used to
study the growth of crystals of oxygensensitive proteins and trapping of
catalytic intermediates in crystals of
enzymes which utilize oxygen as a
substrate. The objective is to produce
atomic resolution molecular structures
of oxygen-sensitive or oxygendependent proteins by x-ray
crystallography. The necessary features
of this instrument include an entry port
in the floor of the microscope box that
forms an air-tight seal with a two liter
liquid nitrogen dewar mated to the port
from outside the box. Air needs to be
expelled (purged) from above the liquid
nitrogen surface and replaced with
gaseous nitrogen. Closure of the port
allows removal of the dewar. An airtight door between the larger anaerobic
crystallization box and the anaerobic
microscope box is also necessary.
Dated: May 13, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–11784 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[FR Doc. 2014–11788 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 98 (Wednesday, May 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 29168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
The University of Memphis, et al.; Notice of Consolidated
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 13-050. Applicant: The University of Memphis,
Memphis, TN 38152-3370. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 6542,
February 4, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-051. Applicant: The Scripps Research Institute,
La Jolla, CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
79 FR 6542, February 4, 2014.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 15, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-11788 Filed 5-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
