Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 28894-28895 [2014-11682]
Download as PDF
28894
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–935, C–570–936]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Line Pipe From the People’s Republic
of China: Continuation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that
revocation of the antidumping duty
(‘‘AD’’) order on circular welded carbon
quality steel line pipe from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and that revocation of the
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on
circular welded carbon quality steel line
pipe from the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy. The U.S.
International Trade Commission (the
‘‘USITC’’) has also determined that
revocation of these AD and CVD orders
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States. The
Department is publishing this notice of
the continuation of these AD and CVD
orders.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: May 20, 2014.
Lori
Apodaca (AD order) or Kristen Johnson
(CVD order), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4551 and (202) 482–4793,
respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On December 2, 2013, the Department
initiated the first five-year (‘‘sunset’’)
reviews of the AD and CVD order on
circular welded carbon quality steel line
pipe from the PRC pursuant to sections
751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of
its reviews, the Department found that
revocation of the AD order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and that revocation of the CVD
order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of subsidization, and
notified the USITC of the margins of
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 72061 (December 2, 2013).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 May 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
dumping and the subsidy rates likely to
prevail were the orders to be revoked.2
On May 8, 2014, the USITC published
its determination, pursuant to section
751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act,
that revocation of the AD and CVD
orders on circular welded carbon
quality steel line pipe from the PRC
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time.3
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by these AD
and CVD orders are circular welded
carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used
for oil and gas pipelines (welded line
pipe) not more than 406.4 mm (16
inches) in outside diameter, regardless
of wall thickness, length, surface finish,
end finish or stenciling.
The term ‘‘carbon quality steel’’
includes both carbon steel and carbon
steel mixed with small amounts of
alloying elements that may exceed the
individual weight limits for non alloy
steels imposed in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Specifically, the term
‘‘carbon quality’’ includes products in
which (1) iron predominates by weight
over each of the other contained
elements, (2) the carbon content is 2
percent or less by weight and (3) none
of the elements listed below exceeds the
quantity by weight respectively
indicated:
(i) 2.00 percent of manganese,
(ii) 2.25 percent of silicon,
(iii) 1.00 percent of copper,
(iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum,
(v) 1.25 percent of chromium,
(vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt,
(vii) 0.40 percent of lead,
(viii) 1.25 percent of nickel,
(ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten,
(x) 0.012 percent of boron,
(xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum,
(xii) 0.15 percent of niobium,
(xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium,
(xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
(xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
Welded line pipe is normally
produced to specifications published by
the American Petroleum Institute
(‘‘API’’) (or comparable foreign
2 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line
Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 19052 (April 7,
2014) and Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 15313 (March 19,
2014).
3 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line
Pipe From China, 79 FR 26454 (May 8, 2014); see
also USITC Publication 4464 (May 2014) entitled
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe
From China (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731–TA–
1149 (Review)).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specifications) including API A–25,
5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and
above, and/or any other proprietary
grades or non-graded material.
Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the
physical description set forth above that
is of a kind used in oil and gas
pipelines, including all multiplestenciled pipe with an API welded line
pipe stencil is covered by the scope of
the orders.
Excluded from the scope are pipes of
a kind used for oil and gas pipelines
that are multiple-stenciled to a standard
and/or structural specification and have
one or more of the following
characteristics: Is 32 feet in length or
less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in
outside diameter; has a galvanized and/
or painted surface finish; or has a
threaded and/or coupled end finish.
(The term ‘‘painted’’ does not include
coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such
as varnish, but includes coatings such as
polyester.)
The welded line pipe products that
are the subject of the orders are
currently classifiable in the HTSUS
under subheadings 7306.19.10.10,
7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and
7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the USITC that
revocation of these AD and CVD orders
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy, and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the
AD and CVD orders on circular welded
carbon quality steel line pipe from the
PRC.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect cash deposits at
the rates in effect at the time of entry for
all imports of subject merchandise. The
effective date of the continuation of
these orders is the date of publication in
the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year
review of these orders not later than 30
days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of the continuation.
These five-year (sunset) reviews and
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices
Dated: May 13, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090,
0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750,
0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500,
2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700,
0703.20.0005, 2005.99.9700 and
0703.20.0015. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2014–11682 Filed 5–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the New Shipper Review of Jinxiang
Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and
Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods
Co., Ltd.
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new
shipper review of Jinxiang Merry
Vegetable Co., Ltd. (‘‘Merry’’) and
Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingshui’’) regarding the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘the PRC’’). The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2012, through
April 30, 2013. We preliminarily find
that Merry and Qingshui made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Carey or Hilary E. Sadler, Esq.,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3964 or (202) 482–4340,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is all grades of garlic, whether
whole or separated into constituent
cloves.1 The subject merchandise is
currently classifiable under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings:
0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0010,
1 See the Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews of Fresh
Garlic From the People’s Republic of China:
Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan
Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.,’’ dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a
complete description of the Scope of the Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 May 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR
351.214. Export prices have been
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a
nonmarket economy within the meaning
of section 771(18) of the Act, normal
value has been calculated in accordance
with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s centralized electronic
service system (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the
Department’s Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
28895
351.224(b). Interested parties may
submit written comments by no later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results
of review.2 Rebuttals to written
comments may be filed by no later than
five days after the written comments are
filed.3
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice.4 Hearing requests should
contain the following information: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
be limited to issues raised in the briefs.
If a request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date for
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.5
The Department will issue the final
results of this new shipper review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any such
comments, within 90 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results of this
new shipper review, the Department
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.6 The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this new shipper review.
In this new shipper review, we
calculated a per-unit rate for each
importer by dividing the total dumping
margins for reviewed sales to that party
Preliminary Results of New Shipper
by the total sales quantity associated
Reviews
with those transactions. For dutyThe Department preliminarily
assessment rates calculated on this
determines that the following weighted- basis, we will direct CBP to assess the
average dumping margins exist:
resulting per-unit rate against the
entered quantity of the subject
Weightedmerchandise. If the respondent’s
average
weighted-average dumping margin is
Exporter
dumping
margin
above de minimis, we will calculate an
($ per kg)
importer-specific ad valorem duty
assessment rate based on the ratio of the
Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable
Foods Co., Ltd ....................
$3.06 per kg total amount of dumping calculated for
the importer’s examined sales to the
Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co.,
Ltd .......................................
3.33 per kg total entered value of those same sales
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Then, we will instruct
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose
calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the parties within
five days of the date of publication of
this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 See
19 CFR 351.309(c).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
4 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
5 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
3 See
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28894-28895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11682]
[[Page 28894]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-935, C-570-936]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People's
Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') has determined
that revocation of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on circular
welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the People's Republic of
China (``PRC'') would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and that revocation of the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order
on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy.
The U.S. International Trade Commission (the ``USITC'') has also
determined that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead
to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in
the United States. The Department is publishing this notice of the
continuation of these AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca (AD order) or Kristen
Johnson (CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-4551 and (202) 482-4793, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 2, 2013, the Department initiated the first five-year
(``sunset'') reviews of the AD and CVD order on circular welded carbon
quality steel line pipe from the PRC pursuant to sections 751(c) and
752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ As a result
of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD order
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that
revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of subsidization, and notified the USITC of the margins of
dumping and the subsidy rates likely to prevail were the orders to be
revoked.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 72061
(December 2, 2013).
\2\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 19052 (April 7,
2014) and Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review
of the Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 15313 (March 19, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 8, 2014, the USITC published its determination, pursuant to
section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the
AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe
from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From
China, 79 FR 26454 (May 8, 2014); see also USITC Publication 4464
(May 2014) entitled Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe
From China (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-455 and 731-TA-1149 (Review)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by these AD and CVD orders are circular welded
carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines
(welded line pipe) not more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in outside
diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, end
finish or stenciling.
The term ``carbon quality steel'' includes both carbon steel and
carbon steel mixed with small amounts of alloying elements that may
exceed the individual weight limits for non alloy steels imposed in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').
Specifically, the term ``carbon quality'' includes products in which
(1) iron predominates by weight over each of the other contained
elements, (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight and (3)
none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight
respectively indicated:
(i) 2.00 percent of manganese,
(ii) 2.25 percent of silicon,
(iii) 1.00 percent of copper,
(iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum,
(v) 1.25 percent of chromium,
(vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt,
(vii) 0.40 percent of lead,
(viii) 1.25 percent of nickel,
(ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten,
(x) 0.012 percent of boron,
(xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum,
(xii) 0.15 percent of niobium,
(xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium,
(xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
(xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
Welded line pipe is normally produced to specifications published
by the American Petroleum Institute (``API'') (or comparable foreign
specifications) including API A-25, 5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and
above, and/or any other proprietary grades or non-graded material.
Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the physical description set forth above
that is of a kind used in oil and gas pipelines, including all
multiple-stenciled pipe with an API welded line pipe stencil is covered
by the scope of the orders.
Excluded from the scope are pipes of a kind used for oil and gas
pipelines that are multiple-stenciled to a standard and/or structural
specification and have one or more of the following characteristics: Is
32 feet in length or less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in outside
diameter; has a galvanized and/or painted surface finish; or has a
threaded and/or coupled end finish. (The term ``painted'' does not
include coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such as varnish, but
includes coatings such as polyester.)
The welded line pipe products that are the subject of the orders
are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings
7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the USITC
that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy, and
material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders
the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon
quality steel line pipe from the PRC.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of these
orders is the date of publication in the Federal Register of this
notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these
orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of the continuation.
These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
[[Page 28895]]
Dated: May 13, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-11682 Filed 5-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P