Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 28894-28895 [2014-11682]

Download as PDF 28894 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–935, C–570–936] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that revocation of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that revocation of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy. The U.S. International Trade Commission (the ‘‘USITC’’) has also determined that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States. The Department is publishing this notice of the continuation of these AD and CVD orders. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2014. Lori Apodaca (AD order) or Kristen Johnson (CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4551 and (202) 482–4793, respectively. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On December 2, 2013, the Department initiated the first five-year (‘‘sunset’’) reviews of the AD and CVD order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of subsidization, and notified the USITC of the margins of 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 72061 (December 2, 2013). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:09 May 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 dumping and the subsidy rates likely to prevail were the orders to be revoked.2 On May 8, 2014, the USITC published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.3 Scope of the Orders The products covered by these AD and CVD orders are circular welded carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines (welded line pipe) not more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, end finish or stenciling. The term ‘‘carbon quality steel’’ includes both carbon steel and carbon steel mixed with small amounts of alloying elements that may exceed the individual weight limits for non alloy steels imposed in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Specifically, the term ‘‘carbon quality’’ includes products in which (1) iron predominates by weight over each of the other contained elements, (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) 2.00 percent of manganese, (ii) 2.25 percent of silicon, (iii) 1.00 percent of copper, (iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum, (v) 1.25 percent of chromium, (vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt, (vii) 0.40 percent of lead, (viii) 1.25 percent of nickel, (ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten, (x) 0.012 percent of boron, (xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum, (xii) 0.15 percent of niobium, (xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium, (xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or (xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium. Welded line pipe is normally produced to specifications published by the American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) (or comparable foreign 2 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 19052 (April 7, 2014) and Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 15313 (March 19, 2014). 3 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From China, 79 FR 26454 (May 8, 2014); see also USITC Publication 4464 (May 2014) entitled Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From China (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731–TA– 1149 (Review)). PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 specifications) including API A–25, 5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and above, and/or any other proprietary grades or non-graded material. Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the physical description set forth above that is of a kind used in oil and gas pipelines, including all multiplestenciled pipe with an API welded line pipe stencil is covered by the scope of the orders. Excluded from the scope are pipes of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines that are multiple-stenciled to a standard and/or structural specification and have one or more of the following characteristics: Is 32 feet in length or less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in outside diameter; has a galvanized and/ or painted surface finish; or has a threaded and/or coupled end finish. (The term ‘‘painted’’ does not include coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such as varnish, but includes coatings such as polyester.) The welded line pipe products that are the subject of the orders are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings 7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by the Department and the USITC that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of these orders is the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the continuation. These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices Dated: May 13, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, 0703.20.0005, 2005.99.9700 and 0703.20.0015. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2014–11682 Filed 5–19–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–831] Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new shipper review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. (‘‘Merry’’) and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingshui’’) regarding the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘the PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. We preliminarily find that Merry and Qingshui made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey or Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964 or (202) 482–4340, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is all grades of garlic, whether whole or separated into constituent cloves.1 The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0010, 1 See the Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews of Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a complete description of the Scope of the Order. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:09 May 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a nonmarket economy within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s centralized electronic service system (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Department’s Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. 28895 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit written comments by no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.2 Rebuttals to written comments may be filed by no later than five days after the written comments are filed.3 Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.4 Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.5 The Department will issue the final results of this new shipper review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such comments, within 90 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of this new shipper review, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.6 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this new shipper review. In this new shipper review, we calculated a per-unit rate for each importer by dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party Preliminary Results of New Shipper by the total sales quantity associated Reviews with those transactions. For dutyThe Department preliminarily assessment rates calculated on this determines that the following weighted- basis, we will direct CBP to assess the average dumping margins exist: resulting per-unit rate against the entered quantity of the subject Weightedmerchandise. If the respondent’s average weighted-average dumping margin is Exporter dumping margin above de minimis, we will calculate an ($ per kg) importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd .................... $3.06 per kg total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd ....................................... 3.33 per kg total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Then, we will instruct Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 19 CFR 351.309(d). 4 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 5 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 3 See E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28894-28895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11682]



[[Page 28894]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-935, C-570-936]


Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People's 
Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') has determined 
that revocation of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on circular 
welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the People's Republic of 
China (``PRC'') would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping, and that revocation of the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order 
on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would 
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy. 
The U.S. International Trade Commission (the ``USITC'') has also 
determined that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead 
to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States. The Department is publishing this notice of the 
continuation of these AD and CVD orders.

DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca (AD order) or Kristen 
Johnson (CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-4551 and (202) 482-4793, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 2, 2013, the Department initiated the first five-year 
(``sunset'') reviews of the AD and CVD order on circular welded carbon 
quality steel line pipe from the PRC pursuant to sections 751(c) and 
752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ As a result 
of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD order 
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that 
revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of subsidization, and notified the USITC of the margins of 
dumping and the subsidy rates likely to prevail were the orders to be 
revoked.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 72061 
(December 2, 2013).
    \2\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First 
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 19052 (April 7, 
2014) and Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review 
of the Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 15313 (March 19, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 8, 2014, the USITC published its determination, pursuant to 
section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the 
AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe 
from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From 
China, 79 FR 26454 (May 8, 2014); see also USITC Publication 4464 
(May 2014) entitled Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe 
From China (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-455 and 731-TA-1149 (Review)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The products covered by these AD and CVD orders are circular welded 
carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines 
(welded line pipe) not more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in outside 
diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, end 
finish or stenciling.
    The term ``carbon quality steel'' includes both carbon steel and 
carbon steel mixed with small amounts of alloying elements that may 
exceed the individual weight limits for non alloy steels imposed in the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). 
Specifically, the term ``carbon quality'' includes products in which 
(1) iron predominates by weight over each of the other contained 
elements, (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight and (3) 
none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight 
respectively indicated:
    (i) 2.00 percent of manganese,
    (ii) 2.25 percent of silicon,
    (iii) 1.00 percent of copper,
    (iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum,
    (v) 1.25 percent of chromium,
    (vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt,
    (vii) 0.40 percent of lead,
    (viii) 1.25 percent of nickel,
    (ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten,
    (x) 0.012 percent of boron,
    (xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum,
    (xii) 0.15 percent of niobium,
    (xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium,
    (xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
    (xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
    Welded line pipe is normally produced to specifications published 
by the American Petroleum Institute (``API'') (or comparable foreign 
specifications) including API A-25, 5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and 
above, and/or any other proprietary grades or non-graded material. 
Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the physical description set forth above 
that is of a kind used in oil and gas pipelines, including all 
multiple-stenciled pipe with an API welded line pipe stencil is covered 
by the scope of the orders.
    Excluded from the scope are pipes of a kind used for oil and gas 
pipelines that are multiple-stenciled to a standard and/or structural 
specification and have one or more of the following characteristics: Is 
32 feet in length or less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in outside 
diameter; has a galvanized and/or painted surface finish; or has a 
threaded and/or coupled end finish. (The term ``painted'' does not 
include coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such as varnish, but 
includes coatings such as polyester.)
    The welded line pipe products that are the subject of the orders 
are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings 
7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive.

Continuation of the Orders

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the USITC 
that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy, and 
material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to 
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders 
the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon 
quality steel line pipe from the PRC.
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash 
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of 
subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of these 
orders is the date of publication in the Federal Register of this 
notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the 
Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these 
orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 
effective date of the continuation.
    These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with 
section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).


[[Page 28895]]


    Dated: May 13, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-11682 Filed 5-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.