Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records, 26929-26932 [2014-10913]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
2. Does Executive Order 13175 apply to
this proposed rule?
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. Proposing a site to the
NPL does not impose any costs on a
tribe or require a tribe to take remedial
action. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
1. What is Executive Order 13045?
Executive Order 13045: ‘‘Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that:
(1) Is determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
the EPA has reason to believe may have
a disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the agency.
2. Does Executive Order 13045 apply to
this proposed rule?
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it is not
an economically significant rule as
defined by Executive Order 12866, and
because the agency does not have reason
to believe the environmental health or
safety risks addressed by this proposed
rule present a disproportionate risk to
children.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
1. What is Executive Order 13211?
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) requires federal agencies
to prepare a ‘‘Statement of Energy
Effects’’ when undertaking certain
regulatory actions. A Statement of
Energy Effects describes the adverse
effects of a ‘‘significant energy action’’
on energy supply, distribution and use,
reasonable alternatives to the action and
the expected effects of the alternatives
on energy supply, distribution and use.
2. Does Executive Order 13211 apply to
this proposed rule?
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Order 13211, because it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution or use of energy.
Further, the agency has concluded that
this rule is not likely to have any
adverse energy impacts because
proposing a site to the NPL does not
require an entity to conduct any action
that would require energy use, let alone
that which would significantly affect
energy supply, distribution or usage.
Thus, Executive Order 13211 does not
apply to this action.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
1. What is the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act?
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs
the EPA to provide Congress, through
OMB, explanations when the agency
decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards.
2. Does the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act apply to
this proposed rule?
No. This proposed rulemaking does
not involve technical standards.
Therefore, the EPA did not consider the
use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
1. What is Executive Order 12898?
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26929
2. Does Executive Order 12898 apply to
this proposed rule?
The EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. As this rule does not
impose any enforceable duty upon state,
tribal or local governments, this rule
will neither increase nor decrease
environmental protection.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Natural
resources, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Barry Breen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
[FR Doc. 2014–10832 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
42 CFR Part 2
Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Patient Records
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Public Listening
Session.
AGENCY:
The Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) announces that it will hold
a public listening session on
Wednesday, June 11, 2014, to solicit
information concerning the
Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Patient Records Regulations, 42
CFR Part 2. This session will be held in
Rockville, MD, to obtain direct input
from stakeholders on updating the
regulations. The scheduled listening
session provides an opportunity for
SAMHSA to seek public input on
potential changes to the regulations.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
26930
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
The listening session will be
held on Wednesday, June 11, 2014, from
9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Participation: The listening
session will be held at the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration at 1 Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857, Lobby-level
Sugarloaf Conference Room.
SAMHSA will post the agenda and
logistical information on how to
participate via the phone or internet on
the SAMHSA Web site at https://
www.samhsa.gov/healthprivacy in
advance of the listening session.
The session is open to the public and
the entire day’s proceedings will be
webcast, recorded, and made publicly
available. Interested parties may
participate in person or via webcast.
Capacity is limited and registration is
required. To register, go to https://
42cfrpart2listeningsession.eventbrite.com.
Registration will be open until we meet
maximum capacity. In addition to
attending the session in person and
joining via webinar, the Agency offers
several ways to provide comments, as
enumerated below. The forum will
begin with opening remarks from the
SAMHSA official charged with
moderating the session. The session
location is accessible to persons with
disabilities.
You may submit comments using any
of the following methods:
• Mail: The Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration,
1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD
20857, Room 5–1011.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1 Choke
Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857,
Room 5–1011 between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
• Email: PrivacyRegulations@
SAMHSA.hhs.gov.
• Fax: 1–240–276–2900.
Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Comments must be received
by 5:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday June 25,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning the listening
session or the live webcast, please
contact Kate Tipping, Public Health
Advisor, SAMHSA, 1 Choke Cherry
Road, Rockville, MD 20857, Room
5–1011, (240) 276–1652 or email
PrivacyRegulations@SAMHSA.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
I. Background
The federal statute (United States
Code, Title 42, section 290dd–2)
governing the confidentiality of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
substance abuse treatment information
guarantees the confidentiality of
information for persons receiving
substance abuse treatment services from
federally assisted programs. Under the
statute, a federally assisted substance
abuse program generally may only
release identifiable information related
to substance abuse treatment services
with the individual’s express consent.
The federal regulations that implement
this law—Title 42 of the Code of Federal
Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2)—
were last updated in 1987. Over the last
25 years, significant changes have
occurred within the U.S. health care
system that were not envisioned by
these regulations, including new models
of integrated care that are built on a
foundation of information sharing to
support coordination of patient care, the
development of an electronic
infrastructure for managing and
exchanging patient data, the
development of prescription drug
monitoring programs and a new focus
on performance measurement within
the health care system. When the
regulations were written, substance
abuse treatment was primarily
conducted by specialty treatment
providers, and as a result, the impact on
coordination of care was not raised as a
core issue.
SAMHSA has heard from
stakeholders that some of the current
consent requirements make it difficult
for these new health care organizations
including health information exchange
organizations (HIEs), Accountable Care
Organizations (ACOs), and others to
share substance abuse treatment
information. A number of organizations
across the country are excluding
substance abuse treatment data due to
the difficulty and expense of
implementing the functionality and
workflow changes necessary to comply
with current regulations. In these
instances, patients are prevented from
fully participating in integrated care
efforts even if they are willing to
provide consent.
Behavioral health is essential to
overall health and the costs of untreated
substance abuse disorders, both
personal and societal, are enormous.
However, treatment for substance abuse
disorders is still associated with
discrimination. In addition, there may
be potential serious civil and criminal
consequences for the disclosure of this
information beyond the health care
context. There continues to be a need
for confidentiality protections that
encourage patients to seek treatment
without fear of compromising their
privacy. SAMHSA strives to facilitate
information exchange while respecting
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the legitimate privacy concerns of
patients due to the potential for
discrimination and legal consequences.
We hope to clarify the requirements
associated with information exchange in
these new models and reduce burdens
associated with specific consent
requirements that do not serve to protect
patient privacy.
In consideration of the concerns
raised regarding the application of 42
CFR Part 2 to new health care models
and the continued need for
confidentiality protections, the Agency
will conduct a public listening session
to provide all interested parties the
opportunity to share their views on the
subject prior to the initiation of
rulemaking. Members of the public are
invited to attend and view the
proceedings, with space available on a
first-come, first-served basis (based on
registration). Written comments may
also be submitted at the session or
through the process described above.
SAMHSA asks listening session
participants to consider the following
questions in preparing to make
comments at the listening session.
Listening session attendees will also be
provided with a list of these questions
at the forum site:
a. Applicability of 42 CFR Part 2
42 CFR Part 2 currently applies to
federally funded individuals or entities
that ‘‘hold themselves out as providing,
and provide, alcohol or drug abuse
diagnosis, treatment or treatment
referral’’ including units within a
general medical facility that hold
themselves out as providing diagnosis,
treatment or treatment referral (§ 2.11
Definitions, Program). The U.S. health
care system is changing and more
substance abuse treatment is occurring
in general health care and integrated
care settings which are typically not
covered under the current regulations. It
has also posed difficulties for
identifying which providers are covered
by Part 2; whether a provider or
organization is covered by Part 2 can
change depending on whether they
advertise their substance abuse
treatment services (i.e. ‘hold themselves
out’), which can change over time.
SAMHSA is considering options for
defining what information is covered
under 42 CFR Part 2. Covered
information could be defined based on
what substance abuse treatment services
are provided instead of being defined by
the type of facility providing the
services. For example, the regulations
could be applied to any federally
assisted health care provider that
provides a patient with specialty
substance abuse treatment services. In
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
this scenario, providers would not be
covered if they provided only substance
abuse screening, brief intervention, or
other similar pre-treatment substance
abuse services.
• How would redefining the
applicability of 42 CFR Part 2 impact
patients, health care provider
organizations, HIEs, CCOs, HIT vendors,
etc.?
• Would this change address
stakeholder concerns?
• Would this change raise any new
concerns?
b. Consent Requirements
SAMHSA has heard a number of
concerns from individuals and
stakeholders regarding the current
consent requirements of 42 CFR Part 2.
42 CFR 2.31 requires the written
consent to include the name or title of
the individual or the name of the
organization to which the disclosure is
to be made. This is commonly referred
to as the ‘‘To Whom’’ consent
requirement. Some stakeholders have
reported that this requirement makes it
difficult to include programs covered by
42 CFR Part 2 in HIEs, health homes,
ACOs and CCOs. These organizations
have a large and growing number of
member providers and they generally do
not have sophisticated consent
management capabilities. Currently, a
Part 2 compliant consent cannot include
future un-named providers which
requires the collection of updated
consent forms whenever new providers
join these organizations. As a result,
many of these organizations are
currently not including substance abuse
treatment information in their systems.
While technical solutions for
managing consent collection are
possible, SAMHSA is examining the
consent requirements in § 2.31 to
explore options for facilitating the flow
of information within the health care
context while ensuring the patient is
fully informed and the necessary
protections are in place. Specifically, we
are analyzing the current requirements
and considering the impact of adapting
them to:
1. Allow the consent to include a
more general description of the
individual, organization, or health care
entity to which disclosure is to be made.
2. Require the patient be provided
with a list of providers or organizations
that may access their information, and
be notified regularly of changes to the
list.
3. Require the consent to name the
individual or health care entity
permitted to make the disclosure.
4. Require that if the health care entity
permitted to make the disclosure is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
made up of multiple independent units
or organizations that the unit,
organization, or provider releasing
substance abuse related information be
specifically named.
5. Require that the consent form
explicitly describe the substance abuse
treatment information that may be
disclosed.
SAMHSA welcomes comments on
patient privacy concerns as well as the
anticipated impact of the consent
requirements on integration of
substance abuse treatment data into
HIEs, health homes, ACOs, and CCOs.
• Would these changes maintain the
privacy protections for patients?
• Would these changes address the
concerns of HIEs, health homes, ACOs,
and CCOs?
• Would these changes raise any new
concerns?
c. Redisclosure
SAMHSA has also heard numerous
concerns regarding the prohibition on
redisclosure (§ 2.32). Currently most
EHRs don’t support data segmentation.
Without this functionality, EHR systems
must either keep alcohol and drug abuse
patient records separate from the rest of
the patient’s medical record or apply the
42 CFR Part 2 protections to the
patient’s entire medical record if such
record contains information that is
subject to 42 CFR Part 2.
SAMHSA is considering revising the
redisclosure provision to clarify that the
prohibition on redisclosure only applies
to information that would identify an
individual as a substance abuser, and
allows other health-related information
shared by the Part 2 program to be
redisclosed, if legally permissible. This
would allow HIT systems to more easily
identify information that is subject to
the prohibition on redisclosure enabling
them to utilize other technological
approaches to manage redisclosure. If
data are associated with information
about where the data were collected
(data provenance) which reveals that the
data were collected by a practice that
exclusively treats addiction, the data
would still be protected under the
proposed change.
• Would this type of change facilitate
technical solutions for complying with
42 CFR Part 2 in an EHR or HIE
environment?
• Would these changes maintain the
privacy protections for patients?
d. Medical Emergency
SAMHSA has heard concerns
regarding the medical emergency
exception of 42 CFR Part 2 (§ 2.51). The
current regulations state that
information may be disclosed without
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26931
consent ‘‘for the purpose of treating a
condition which poses an immediate
threat to the health of any individual
and which requires immediate medical
intervention.’’ The statute, however,
states that records may be disclosed to
medical personnel to the extent
necessary to meet a bona fide medical
emergency. SAMHSA is considering
adapting the medical emergency
exception to make it more in-line with
the statutory language and to give
providers more discretion as to when a
bona fide emergency exists. For
example, amending this standard to
allow providers to use the medical
emergency provision to prevent
emergencies or to share information
with a detoxification center when a
patient is unable to provide informed
consent due to their level of
intoxication.
• What factors should providers take
into consideration in determining
whether a medical emergency exists?
• Are there specific use cases
SAMHSA should take into
consideration?
• Are there patient concerns about
the impact of this change on their
privacy?
e. Qualified Service Organization (QSO)
SAMHSA has also heard concerns
from payers and health management
organizations related to disclosing
information that is subject to 42 CFR
Part 2 to health care entities (ACOs/
CCOs) for the purpose of care
coordination and population health
management; helping them to identify
patients with chronic conditions in
need of more intensive outreach. Under
the current regulations, substance abuse
information may not be shared for these
purposes without consent.
SAMHSA is analyzing the regulations
to identify options for allowing Part 2
data to flow to health care entities for
the purpose of care coordination and
population management while
maintaining patient protections. One
potential solution includes expanding
the definition of a qualified service
organization (QSO; § 2.11) to explicitly
include care coordination services and
to allow a QSO Agreement (QSOA) to be
executed between an entity that stores
Part 2 information, such as a payer or
an ACO that is not itself a Part 2
program, and a service provider.
• Are there other use cases we should
be taking into consideration?
• Are there specific patient concerns
about the impact of this change on their
privacy?
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
26932
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
f. Research
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Under the current regulations, the
Part 2 ‘‘program director’’ has to
authorize the release of information for
scientific research purposes. This issue
has been brought to SAMHSA’s
attention from organizations that store
patient health data, including data that
are subject to Part 2, which may be used
for research (e.g. health management
organizations). Under the current
regulatory framework, absent consent,
these organizations do not have the
authority to disclose Part 2 data for
scientific research purposes to qualified
researchers or research organizations.
This issue can be addressed by
expanding the authority for releasing
data to qualified researchers/research
organizations to other health care
entities that receive and store Part 2
data, including third-party payers, HIEs,
and care coordination organizations for
the purposes of research, audit, or
evaluation.
SAMHSA is considering expanding
the authority for releasing data to
qualified researchers/research
organizations to health care entities that
receive and store Part 2 data, including
third-party payers, health management
organizations, HIEs, and care
coordination organizations.
• Are there factors that should be
considered related to how current
health care entities are organized, how
they function or how legal duties and
responsibilities attach to entities that
make up an umbrella organization?
• Would this change address
concerns related to research?
• Are there specific privacy concerns
associated with expanding the authority
or releasing data to qualified
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
researchers/research organizations in
this way?
• Are there additional use cases that
should be considered in the research
context?
g. Addressing Potential Issues With
Electronic Prescribing and Prescription
Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs)
Part 2 protections include a
prohibition on the redisclosure of
information received directly from a
Part 2 program. A pharmacy that
receives electronic prescription
information directly from a Part 2
program must obtain patient consent to
send that information to a PDMP, and
patient consent is also required for the
PDMP to redisclose that information to
those with access to the PDMP.
Pharmacy data systems do not currently
have mechanisms for managing patient
consent or segregating data that are
subject to Part 2 and preventing the data
from reaching the PDMP. Pharmacy
systems also lack the ability to identify
which providers are subject to Part 2,
making it difficult to prevent the Part 2
data from reaching the PDMP.
If a patient does not consent to
sharing their data via e-prescribing,
their only option for filling their
prescription is to bring a paper
prescription to the pharmacy. In this
instance, since the information is given
by the patient, it is not protected by 42
CFR Part 2. They, therefore, cannot
prevent the information from reaching
the PDMP which in some states is
accessible by law enforcement and has
the potential to lead to investigation/
arrest and other forms of discrimination.
• How do pharmacy information
system vendors anticipate addressing
this issue? Are there specific technology
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
barriers SAMHSA should take into
consideration?
• Are there other concerns regarding
42 CFR Part 2 and PDMPs? Please
describe relevant use cases and provide
recommendations on how to address the
concerns.
• Are there patient concerns about
the impact of e-prescribing and PDMPs
on their privacy?
Draft Agenda for the June 11, 2014
Public Listening Session
—Welcome and Introductions—9:30
a.m.–9:45 a.m.
—Applicability of 42 CFR Part 2—9:45
a.m.–10:45 a.m.
—Consent requirements—10:45 a.m.–
11:45 a.m.
—Redisclosure and Medical emergency
provisions—11:45 a.m.–12:45 p.m.
—LUNCH (on your own)—12:45 p.m.–
1:15 p.m.
—Quality Service Organization (QSO)
provision—1:15 p.m.–1:45 p.m.
—Research—1:45 p.m.–2:45 p.m.
—Electronic prescribing and
prescription drug monitoring
programs (PDMPs)—2:45 p.m.–3:30
p.m.
—Open Comment Period—3:30 p.m.–
4:30 p.m.
The agenda will be strictly followed;
participants may attend all or part of the
listening session as relevant. The
updated agenda will be posted on the
SAMHSA Web site at https://
www.samhsa.gov/healthprivacy in
advance of the listening session.
Cathy J. Friedman,
SAMHSA Public Health Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2014–10913 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26929-26932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10913]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
42 CFR Part 2
Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records
AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Public Listening Session.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) announces that it will hold a public listening session on
Wednesday, June 11, 2014, to solicit information concerning the
Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records Regulations,
42 CFR Part 2. This session will be held in Rockville, MD, to obtain
direct input from stakeholders on updating the regulations. The
scheduled listening session provides an opportunity for SAMHSA to seek
public input on potential changes to the regulations.
[[Page 26930]]
DATES: The listening session will be held on Wednesday, June 11, 2014,
from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Participation: The listening session will be held at the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration at 1 Choke
Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857, Lobby-level Sugarloaf Conference
Room.
SAMHSA will post the agenda and logistical information on how to
participate via the phone or internet on the SAMHSA Web site at https://www.samhsa.gov/healthprivacy in advance of the listening session.
The session is open to the public and the entire day's proceedings
will be webcast, recorded, and made publicly available. Interested
parties may participate in person or via webcast. Capacity is limited
and registration is required. To register, go to https://42cfrpart2-listeningsession.eventbrite.com. Registration will be open until we
meet maximum capacity. In addition to attending the session in person
and joining via webinar, the Agency offers several ways to provide
comments, as enumerated below. The forum will begin with opening
remarks from the SAMHSA official charged with moderating the session.
The session location is accessible to persons with disabilities.
You may submit comments using any of the following methods:
Mail: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857, Room 5-1011.
Hand Delivery or Courier: 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville,
MD 20857, Room 5-1011 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
Email: PrivacyRegulations@SAMHSA.hhs.gov.
Fax: 1-240-276-2900.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday
June 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the
listening session or the live webcast, please contact Kate Tipping,
Public Health Advisor, SAMHSA, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD
20857, Room 5-1011, (240) 276-1652 or email
PrivacyRegulations@SAMHSA.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The federal statute (United States Code, Title 42, section 290dd-2)
governing the confidentiality of substance abuse treatment information
guarantees the confidentiality of information for persons receiving
substance abuse treatment services from federally assisted programs.
Under the statute, a federally assisted substance abuse program
generally may only release identifiable information related to
substance abuse treatment services with the individual's express
consent. The federal regulations that implement this law--Title 42 of
the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2)--were last
updated in 1987. Over the last 25 years, significant changes have
occurred within the U.S. health care system that were not envisioned by
these regulations, including new models of integrated care that are
built on a foundation of information sharing to support coordination of
patient care, the development of an electronic infrastructure for
managing and exchanging patient data, the development of prescription
drug monitoring programs and a new focus on performance measurement
within the health care system. When the regulations were written,
substance abuse treatment was primarily conducted by specialty
treatment providers, and as a result, the impact on coordination of
care was not raised as a core issue.
SAMHSA has heard from stakeholders that some of the current consent
requirements make it difficult for these new health care organizations
including health information exchange organizations (HIEs), Accountable
Care Organizations (ACOs), and others to share substance abuse
treatment information. A number of organizations across the country are
excluding substance abuse treatment data due to the difficulty and
expense of implementing the functionality and workflow changes
necessary to comply with current regulations. In these instances,
patients are prevented from fully participating in integrated care
efforts even if they are willing to provide consent.
Behavioral health is essential to overall health and the costs of
untreated substance abuse disorders, both personal and societal, are
enormous. However, treatment for substance abuse disorders is still
associated with discrimination. In addition, there may be potential
serious civil and criminal consequences for the disclosure of this
information beyond the health care context. There continues to be a
need for confidentiality protections that encourage patients to seek
treatment without fear of compromising their privacy. SAMHSA strives to
facilitate information exchange while respecting the legitimate privacy
concerns of patients due to the potential for discrimination and legal
consequences. We hope to clarify the requirements associated with
information exchange in these new models and reduce burdens associated
with specific consent requirements that do not serve to protect patient
privacy.
In consideration of the concerns raised regarding the application
of 42 CFR Part 2 to new health care models and the continued need for
confidentiality protections, the Agency will conduct a public listening
session to provide all interested parties the opportunity to share
their views on the subject prior to the initiation of rulemaking.
Members of the public are invited to attend and view the proceedings,
with space available on a first-come, first-served basis (based on
registration). Written comments may also be submitted at the session or
through the process described above.
SAMHSA asks listening session participants to consider the
following questions in preparing to make comments at the listening
session. Listening session attendees will also be provided with a list
of these questions at the forum site:
a. Applicability of 42 CFR Part 2
42 CFR Part 2 currently applies to federally funded individuals or
entities that ``hold themselves out as providing, and provide, alcohol
or drug abuse diagnosis, treatment or treatment referral'' including
units within a general medical facility that hold themselves out as
providing diagnosis, treatment or treatment referral (Sec. 2.11
Definitions, Program). The U.S. health care system is changing and more
substance abuse treatment is occurring in general health care and
integrated care settings which are typically not covered under the
current regulations. It has also posed difficulties for identifying
which providers are covered by Part 2; whether a provider or
organization is covered by Part 2 can change depending on whether they
advertise their substance abuse treatment services (i.e. `hold
themselves out'), which can change over time.
SAMHSA is considering options for defining what information is
covered under 42 CFR Part 2. Covered information could be defined based
on what substance abuse treatment services are provided instead of
being defined by the type of facility providing the services. For
example, the regulations could be applied to any federally assisted
health care provider that provides a patient with specialty substance
abuse treatment services. In
[[Page 26931]]
this scenario, providers would not be covered if they provided only
substance abuse screening, brief intervention, or other similar pre-
treatment substance abuse services.
How would redefining the applicability of 42 CFR Part 2
impact patients, health care provider organizations, HIEs, CCOs, HIT
vendors, etc.?
Would this change address stakeholder concerns?
Would this change raise any new concerns?
b. Consent Requirements
SAMHSA has heard a number of concerns from individuals and
stakeholders regarding the current consent requirements of 42 CFR Part
2. 42 CFR 2.31 requires the written consent to include the name or
title of the individual or the name of the organization to which the
disclosure is to be made. This is commonly referred to as the ``To
Whom'' consent requirement. Some stakeholders have reported that this
requirement makes it difficult to include programs covered by 42 CFR
Part 2 in HIEs, health homes, ACOs and CCOs. These organizations have a
large and growing number of member providers and they generally do not
have sophisticated consent management capabilities. Currently, a Part 2
compliant consent cannot include future un-named providers which
requires the collection of updated consent forms whenever new providers
join these organizations. As a result, many of these organizations are
currently not including substance abuse treatment information in their
systems.
While technical solutions for managing consent collection are
possible, SAMHSA is examining the consent requirements in Sec. 2.31 to
explore options for facilitating the flow of information within the
health care context while ensuring the patient is fully informed and
the necessary protections are in place. Specifically, we are analyzing
the current requirements and considering the impact of adapting them
to:
1. Allow the consent to include a more general description of the
individual, organization, or health care entity to which disclosure is
to be made.
2. Require the patient be provided with a list of providers or
organizations that may access their information, and be notified
regularly of changes to the list.
3. Require the consent to name the individual or health care entity
permitted to make the disclosure.
4. Require that if the health care entity permitted to make the
disclosure is made up of multiple independent units or organizations
that the unit, organization, or provider releasing substance abuse
related information be specifically named.
5. Require that the consent form explicitly describe the substance
abuse treatment information that may be disclosed.
SAMHSA welcomes comments on patient privacy concerns as well as the
anticipated impact of the consent requirements on integration of
substance abuse treatment data into HIEs, health homes, ACOs, and CCOs.
Would these changes maintain the privacy protections for
patients?
Would these changes address the concerns of HIEs, health
homes, ACOs, and CCOs?
Would these changes raise any new concerns?
c. Redisclosure
SAMHSA has also heard numerous concerns regarding the prohibition
on redisclosure (Sec. 2.32). Currently most EHRs don't support data
segmentation. Without this functionality, EHR systems must either keep
alcohol and drug abuse patient records separate from the rest of the
patient's medical record or apply the 42 CFR Part 2 protections to the
patient's entire medical record if such record contains information
that is subject to 42 CFR Part 2.
SAMHSA is considering revising the redisclosure provision to
clarify that the prohibition on redisclosure only applies to
information that would identify an individual as a substance abuser,
and allows other health-related information shared by the Part 2
program to be redisclosed, if legally permissible. This would allow HIT
systems to more easily identify information that is subject to the
prohibition on redisclosure enabling them to utilize other
technological approaches to manage redisclosure. If data are associated
with information about where the data were collected (data provenance)
which reveals that the data were collected by a practice that
exclusively treats addiction, the data would still be protected under
the proposed change.
Would this type of change facilitate technical solutions
for complying with 42 CFR Part 2 in an EHR or HIE environment?
Would these changes maintain the privacy protections for
patients?
d. Medical Emergency
SAMHSA has heard concerns regarding the medical emergency exception
of 42 CFR Part 2 (Sec. 2.51). The current regulations state that
information may be disclosed without consent ``for the purpose of
treating a condition which poses an immediate threat to the health of
any individual and which requires immediate medical intervention.'' The
statute, however, states that records may be disclosed to medical
personnel to the extent necessary to meet a bona fide medical
emergency. SAMHSA is considering adapting the medical emergency
exception to make it more in-line with the statutory language and to
give providers more discretion as to when a bona fide emergency exists.
For example, amending this standard to allow providers to use the
medical emergency provision to prevent emergencies or to share
information with a detoxification center when a patient is unable to
provide informed consent due to their level of intoxication.
What factors should providers take into consideration in
determining whether a medical emergency exists?
Are there specific use cases SAMHSA should take into
consideration?
Are there patient concerns about the impact of this change
on their privacy?
e. Qualified Service Organization (QSO)
SAMHSA has also heard concerns from payers and health management
organizations related to disclosing information that is subject to 42
CFR Part 2 to health care entities (ACOs/CCOs) for the purpose of care
coordination and population health management; helping them to identify
patients with chronic conditions in need of more intensive outreach.
Under the current regulations, substance abuse information may not be
shared for these purposes without consent.
SAMHSA is analyzing the regulations to identify options for
allowing Part 2 data to flow to health care entities for the purpose of
care coordination and population management while maintaining patient
protections. One potential solution includes expanding the definition
of a qualified service organization (QSO; Sec. 2.11) to explicitly
include care coordination services and to allow a QSO Agreement (QSOA)
to be executed between an entity that stores Part 2 information, such
as a payer or an ACO that is not itself a Part 2 program, and a service
provider.
Are there other use cases we should be taking into
consideration?
Are there specific patient concerns about the impact of
this change on their privacy?
[[Page 26932]]
f. Research
Under the current regulations, the Part 2 ``program director'' has
to authorize the release of information for scientific research
purposes. This issue has been brought to SAMHSA's attention from
organizations that store patient health data, including data that are
subject to Part 2, which may be used for research (e.g. health
management organizations). Under the current regulatory framework,
absent consent, these organizations do not have the authority to
disclose Part 2 data for scientific research purposes to qualified
researchers or research organizations. This issue can be addressed by
expanding the authority for releasing data to qualified researchers/
research organizations to other health care entities that receive and
store Part 2 data, including third-party payers, HIEs, and care
coordination organizations for the purposes of research, audit, or
evaluation.
SAMHSA is considering expanding the authority for releasing data to
qualified researchers/research organizations to health care entities
that receive and store Part 2 data, including third-party payers,
health management organizations, HIEs, and care coordination
organizations.
Are there factors that should be considered related to how
current health care entities are organized, how they function or how
legal duties and responsibilities attach to entities that make up an
umbrella organization?
Would this change address concerns related to research?
Are there specific privacy concerns associated with
expanding the authority or releasing data to qualified researchers/
research organizations in this way?
Are there additional use cases that should be considered
in the research context?
g. Addressing Potential Issues With Electronic Prescribing and
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs)
Part 2 protections include a prohibition on the redisclosure of
information received directly from a Part 2 program. A pharmacy that
receives electronic prescription information directly from a Part 2
program must obtain patient consent to send that information to a PDMP,
and patient consent is also required for the PDMP to redisclose that
information to those with access to the PDMP. Pharmacy data systems do
not currently have mechanisms for managing patient consent or
segregating data that are subject to Part 2 and preventing the data
from reaching the PDMP. Pharmacy systems also lack the ability to
identify which providers are subject to Part 2, making it difficult to
prevent the Part 2 data from reaching the PDMP.
If a patient does not consent to sharing their data via e-
prescribing, their only option for filling their prescription is to
bring a paper prescription to the pharmacy. In this instance, since the
information is given by the patient, it is not protected by 42 CFR Part
2. They, therefore, cannot prevent the information from reaching the
PDMP which in some states is accessible by law enforcement and has the
potential to lead to investigation/arrest and other forms of
discrimination.
How do pharmacy information system vendors anticipate
addressing this issue? Are there specific technology barriers SAMHSA
should take into consideration?
Are there other concerns regarding 42 CFR Part 2 and
PDMPs? Please describe relevant use cases and provide recommendations
on how to address the concerns.
Are there patient concerns about the impact of e-
prescribing and PDMPs on their privacy?
Draft Agenda for the June 11, 2014 Public Listening Session
--Welcome and Introductions--9:30 a.m.-9:45 a.m.
--Applicability of 42 CFR Part 2--9:45 a.m.-10:45 a.m.
--Consent requirements--10:45 a.m.-11:45 a.m.
--Redisclosure and Medical emergency provisions--11:45 a.m.-12:45 p.m.
--LUNCH (on your own)--12:45 p.m.-1:15 p.m.
--Quality Service Organization (QSO) provision--1:15 p.m.-1:45 p.m.
--Research--1:45 p.m.-2:45 p.m.
--Electronic prescribing and prescription drug monitoring programs
(PDMPs)--2:45 p.m.-3:30 p.m.
--Open Comment Period--3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m.
The agenda will be strictly followed; participants may attend all
or part of the listening session as relevant. The updated agenda will
be posted on the SAMHSA Web site at https://www.samhsa.gov/healthprivacy
in advance of the listening session.
Cathy J. Friedman,
SAMHSA Public Health Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2014-10913 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P