Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2011, 26935-26936 [2014-10861]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–844]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2011
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) completed the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain lined paper products from India
for the January 1, 2011, through
December 31, 2011, period of review
(POR) 1 in accordance with section
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). The respondent in
this administrative review is A.R.
Printing & Packaging India Private
Limited (AR Printing).2 Our analysis of
comments received is contained in the
Decision Memorandum accompanying
this Federal Register notice.3 The final
net subsidy rate for AR Printing is listed
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
section.
DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Conniff at 202–482–1009, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On September 28, 2006, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the CVD order on certain lined
paper products from India.4 On October
1 The Department published its preliminary
results for this administrative review in Certain
Lined Paper Products From India: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; Calendar Year 2011, 78 FR 62584 (October
22, 2013) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated
September 30, 2013 (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
2 Also known as A.R. Printing & Packaging (India)
Pvt. Ltd.
3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain
Lined Paper Products From India’’ from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance (Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice.
4 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper
Products From the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products From India, Indonesia and the
People’s Republic of China; and Notice of
Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
22, 2013, the Department published its
preliminary results of administrative
review of the CVD order on certain lined
paper products from India for the POR.5
As explained in the memorandum
from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
October 1, through October 16, 2013.
Therefore, all deadlines in this segment
of the proceeding have been extended
by 16 days.6
AR Printing and the Petitioners 7
submitted case briefs on December 9,
2013, and both submitted rebuttal briefs
on December 16, 2013. No interested
party requested a hearing.
On February 20, 2014, the Department
issued a memorandum extending the
time period for issuing the final results
of this administrative review from
March 7, 2014, to May 6, 2014.8
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain lined paper products. The
products are currently classifiable under
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) item numbers:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080,
4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044,
4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090,
4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains
dispositive.9
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, we determine that there
is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to
a benefit to the recipient, and that the
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949
(September 28, 2006) (Lined Paper Order).
5 Preliminary Results.
6 See Memorandum for the Record from Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown
of the Federal Government’’ (October 18, 2013)
(Tolling Memo).
7 Petitioners are the Association of American
School Paper Suppliers (Petitioners).
8 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior
Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products
From India: Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated February 20, 1014.
9 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Decision Memorandum. See also Lined
Paper Order, 71 FR at 56950–51.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26935
subsidy is specific. See sections
771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section
771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
For a complete description of the
methodology, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in parties’ case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
issues which parties raised, and to
which we responded in the Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as Appendix I. The Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, the
Department determines a net subsidy
rate of 2.94 percent ad valorem for AR
Printing for the period January 1, 2011,
through, December 31, 2011.
Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15
days after the date of publication of
these final results of review to liquidate
shipments of subject merchandise by
AR Printing entered, or withdrawn form
warehouse, for consumption on or after
January 1, 2011, through December 31,
2011, at the ad valorem assessment rate
listed above. We will also instruct CBP
to collect cash deposits for the
respondent at the countervailing duty
cash deposit rate indicated above on all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of
review.
For all non-reviewed companies, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits at the most recent
company-specific or country-wide rate
applicable to the company. Accordingly,
the cash deposit rates that will be
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
26936
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Notices
applied to companies covered by this
order, but not examined in this review,
are those established in the most
recently completed administrative
proceeding for each company. The cash
deposit rates for all companies not
covered by this review are not changed
by the results of this review, and remain
in effect until further notice.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
I. Summary
II. Period of Review
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Attribution of Subsidies
V. Allocation Period
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information—
Benchmarks and Discount Rate
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether the Department Should
Countervail Long-Term Policy Loans
Provided by the State Bank of India
Comment 2: Whether the Department Should
Revise AR Printing’s Sales Denominator
Comment 3: Whether AR Printing Was
Uncreditworthy in 2010
Comment 4: Whether Certain Benefits Under
the Duty-Free Import of Capital Goods
and Raw Materials for Export Oriented
Units (EOUs) Program Were Tied to NonSubject Merchandise
IX. Recommendation
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[C–570–009]
Calcium Hypochlorite From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination in the Countervailing
Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–
482–7906.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 7, 2014, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated the
countervailing duty investigation of
calcium hypochlorite from the People’s
Republic of China.1 Currently, the
preliminary determination is due no
later than March 13, 2014.
Postponement of Due Date for
Preliminary Determination
Appendix
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
AGENCY:
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
[FR Doc. 2014–10861 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a countervailing duty
investigation within 65 days after the
date on which the Department initiated
the investigation. However, the
Department may postpone making the
preliminary determination until no later
than 130 days after the date on which
the administering authority initiated the
investigation if the petitioner makes a
timely request for an extension pursuant
to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act. In the
instant investigation, Petitioner 2 made a
timely request on February 12, 2014,
requesting a postponement of the
preliminary determination pursuant to
19 CFR 351.205(b)(2).3 Therefore,
pursuant to the discretion afforded the
Department under section 703(c)(1)(A)
of the Act and because the Department
does not find any compelling reason to
deny the request, we are fully
postponing the due date until 130 days
1 See
Calcium Hypochlorite From the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigation, 79 FR 2417 (January 14, 2014).
2 Arch Chemicals, Inc.
3 See 19 CFR 351.205(e) and Petitioner’s February
12, 2014 letter requesting postponement of the
preliminary determination.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
after the Department’s initiation for the
preliminary determination. Therefore,
the deadline for the completion of the
preliminary determination is now May
19, 2014.4
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: February 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–10846 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–994]
Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that grain-oriented electrical
steel (GOES) from the People’s Republic
of China (the PRC) is being, or is likely
to be, sold in the United States at less
than fair value, as provided in section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). The period of
investigation is January 1, 2013, through
June 30, 2013. The estimated weightedaverage dumping margin is listed in the
‘‘Preliminary Determination’’ section of
this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary
determination.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edythe Artman or Ericka Ukrow, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–
0405, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4 Department practice dictates that where a
deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the
appropriate deadline is the next business day. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533, 24533 (May 10,
2005).
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26935-26936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10861]
[[Page 26935]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-844]
Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2011
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) completed the
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain
lined paper products from India for the January 1, 2011, through
December 31, 2011, period of review (POR) \1\ in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The
respondent in this administrative review is A.R. Printing & Packaging
India Private Limited (AR Printing).\2\ Our analysis of comments
received is contained in the Decision Memorandum accompanying this
Federal Register notice.\3\ The final net subsidy rate for AR Printing
is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department published its preliminary results for this
administrative review in Certain Lined Paper Products From India:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
Calendar Year 2011, 78 FR 62584 (October 22, 2013) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated
September 30, 2013 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
\2\ Also known as A.R. Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd.
\3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Review: Certain Lined Paper Products From
India'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff at 202-482-1009, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 28, 2006, the Department published in the Federal
Register the CVD order on certain lined paper products from India.\4\
On October 22, 2013, the Department published its preliminary results
of administrative review of the CVD order on certain lined paper
products from India for the POR.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products From the People's
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products From India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006)
(Lined Paper Order).
\5\ Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal
Government from October 1, through October 16, 2013. Therefore, all
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 16
days.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum for the Record from Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by
the Shutdown of the Federal Government'' (October 18, 2013) (Tolling
Memo).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AR Printing and the Petitioners \7\ submitted case briefs on
December 9, 2013, and both submitted rebuttal briefs on December 16,
2013. No interested party requested a hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Petitioners are the Association of American School Paper
Suppliers (Petitioners).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 20, 2014, the Department issued a memorandum extending
the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative
review from March 7, 2014, to May 6, 2014.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ``Certain
Lined Paper Products From India: Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated
February 20, 1014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain lined paper
products. The products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050,
4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
product description remains dispositive.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see
Decision Memorandum. See also Lined Paper Order, 71 FR at 56950-51.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found
countervailable, we determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific. See sections
771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section
771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act
regarding specificity. For a complete description of the methodology,
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in parties' case and rebuttal briefs are
addressed in the Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which
parties raised, and to which we responded in the Decision Memorandum,
is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, the Department determines a net subsidy
rate of 2.94 percent ad valorem for AR Printing for the period January
1, 2011, through, December 31, 2011.
Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of
review to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise by AR Printing
entered, or withdrawn form warehouse, for consumption on or after
January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, at the ad valorem
assessment rate listed above. We will also instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits for the respondent at the countervailing duty cash deposit
rate indicated above on all shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication of these final results of review.
For all non-reviewed companies, we will instruct CBP to continue to
collect cash deposits at the most recent company-specific or country-
wide rate applicable to the company. Accordingly, the cash deposit
rates that will be
[[Page 26936]]
applied to companies covered by this order, but not examined in this
review, are those established in the most recently completed
administrative proceeding for each company. The cash deposit rates for
all companies not covered by this review are not changed by the results
of this review, and remain in effect until further notice.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
I. Summary
II. Period of Review
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Attribution of Subsidies
V. Allocation Period
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information--Benchmarks and Discount Rate
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Countervail Long-Term
Policy Loans Provided by the State Bank of India
Comment 2: Whether the Department Should Revise AR Printing's Sales
Denominator
Comment 3: Whether AR Printing Was Uncreditworthy in 2010
Comment 4: Whether Certain Benefits Under the Duty-Free Import of
Capital Goods and Raw Materials for Export Oriented Units (EOUs)
Program Were Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-10861 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P