Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to JBO Orders, 26787-26789 [2014-10651]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 90 / Friday, May 9, 2014 / Notices
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2014–29 on the subject line.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–29. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 May 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
2014–29, and should be submitted on or
before May 30, 2014.
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2014–10652 Filed 5–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
26787
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72094; File No. SR–Phlx–
2014–28]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
JBO Orders
May 5, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 1,
2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Pricing Schedule to assess joint back
office (‘‘JBO’’) 3 participants pricing the
same as Broker-Dealers 4 and require
JBO participants to utilize a new origin
code to identify JBO orders.
The Exchange proposes that the
amendments become operative on July
1, 2014.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 A JBO participant is a member, member
organization or non-member organization that
maintains a JBO arrangement with a clearing
broker-dealer (‘‘JBO Broker’’) subject to the
requirements of Regulation T Section 220.7 of the
Federal Reserve System. See also Exchange Rule
703.
4 The term ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ applies to any
transaction which is not subject to any of the other
transaction fees applicable within a particular
category.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to introduce a
new origin code to its Pricing Schedule
which will be used to indicate orders for
a JBO account to be cleared into the
Firm range at The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) for purposes of
pricing only. Further, the Exchange
proposes to assess fees and pay rebates
to JBO Orders the same as BrokerDealers.
Currently, JBO orders clear in the
Firm 5 range at OCC as do Firm orders.
The Exchange is proposing to introduce
an origin code for members and member
organizations to identify orders for a
JBO account. Today, the Exchange
requires members and member
organizations to notify the Exchange in
writing and indicate which accounts are
used to segregate orders of JBO
participants from other Firm orders.6
The origin code will simplify the
process of identifying JBO orders for
purposes of pricing only. Members and
member organizations would be
required to mark their JBO orders in
accordance with the technical
specifications definitions which are
provided by the Exchange. This rule
change will not impact the manner in
which JBO orders are treated for
purposes of other Exchange Rules
including but not limited to priority in
the Exchange’s trading system. With this
proposal, JBO orders will continue to be
cleared in the Firm range at OCC.
Today, JBO orders are assessed
5 The term ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any transaction that
is identified by a member or member organization
for clearing in the Firm range at OCC.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62661
(August 13, 2010), 75 FR 49544 (August 6, 2010)
(SR–Phlx–2010–110).
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26788
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 90 / Friday, May 9, 2014 / Notices
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
transaction fees and paid rebates the
same as Firms.
Non-member JBO orders are excluded
from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap 7 and
firm facilitation waiver.8 While member
JBO Orders are eligible for the Monthly
Firm Fee Cap and firm facilitation
waiver today, there are currently no
members who send JBO orders that have
met the qualifications for and have been
afforded the benefit of either the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap or Firm
facilitation waiver. With this proposal,
the Exchange proposes to exclude all
JBO orders, member or non-member,
from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and
Firm facilitation waiver. JBO
participants would be assessed fees and
paid rebates the same as Broker-Dealers
as of July 1, 2014.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s Pricing Schedule to define
the term JBO in the preface as follows:
‘‘The term ‘‘Joint Back Office’’ or ‘‘JBO’’
applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member
7 Firms are subject to a maximum fee of $75,000
(‘‘Monthly Firm Fee Cap’’). Firm Floor Option
Transaction Charges and QCC Transaction Fees, in
the aggregate, for one billing month may not exceed
the Monthly Firm Fee Cap per member organization
when such members are trading in their own
proprietary account. All dividend, merger, and
short stock interest strategy executions (as defined
in Section II) are excluded from the Monthly Firm
Fee Cap. Reversal and conversion, jelly roll and box
spread strategy executions (as defined in Section II)
are included in the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. QCC
Transaction Fees are included in the calculation of
the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. Member organizations
must notify the Exchange in writing of all accounts
in which the member is not trading in its own
proprietary account. The Exchange does not make
adjustments to billing invoices where transactions
are commingled in accounts which are not subject
to the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. JBO participant
charges are not included in the Monthly Firm Fee
Cap. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63780
(January 6, 2011), 76 FR 5846 (February 2, 2011)
(SR–Phlx–2011–07).
8 A facilitation occurs when a floor broker holds
an option order for a public customer and a contraside order for the same options series and, after
providing an opportunity for all persons in the
trading crowd to participate in the transaction,
executes both orders as a facilitation cross. See
Exchange Rule 1064. The Firm Floor Options
Transaction Charges is waived for members
executing facilitation orders pursuant to Exchange
Rule 1064 when such members are trading in their
own proprietary account (including Cabinet
Options Transaction Charges). The Firm Floor
Options Transaction Charges is waived for the buy
side of a transaction if the same member or its
affiliates under Common Ownership represents
both sides of a Firm transaction when such
members are trading in their own proprietary
account. In addition, the Broker-Dealer Floor
Options Transaction Charge (including Cabinet
Options Transaction Charges) is waived for
members executing facilitation orders pursuant to
Exchange Rule 1064 when such members would
otherwise incur this charge for trading in their own
proprietary account contra to a Customer (‘‘BDCustomer Facilitation’’), if the member’s BDCustomer Facilitation average daily volume
(including both FLEX and non-FLEX transactions)
exceeds 10,000 contracts per day in a given month.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 May 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
organization for clearing in the Firm
range at OCC and is identified with an
origin code as a JBO. A JBO will be
priced the same as a Broker-Dealer.’’
Further a footnote describing a JBO is
included in the Preface to the Pricing
Schedule. JBO Orders may be entered
electronically or on the Exchange’s
trading floor.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 9 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 10
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
Adding an origin code to JBO orders is
a more efficient manner in which to
identify those orders separate and apart
from other orders entered on Phlx. In
addition, JBO orders will continue to
clear in the Firm range at OCC as is the
case today. The Exchange will more
easily be able to discern the pricing
associated with clearly identified JBO
orders. This will eliminate any potential
confusion, thereby removing a potential
impediment to and perfecting the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that automating this process of
manually identifying JBO Orders will
promote just and equitable principles of
trade by creating an identifiable method
of distinguishing JBO orders entered
into the Exchange’s Trading System.
The Exchange believes that automating
this process is a more efficient manner
in which to identify and bill these type
of orders.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,11
in general, and with Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5) of the Act,12 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among members and issuers and
other persons using any facility or
system which the Exchange operates or
controls, and is not designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that its proposal
to assess pricing for JBO orders the same
as for Broker-Dealers is reasonable
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
10 15
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
because the Exchange believes that the
business of a JBO is similar to that of an
away market maker and other BrokerDealers. A JBO participant maintains a
JBO arrangement with a JBO Broker
pursuant to Section 220.7 of Regulation
T. A JBO participant could be a member,
member organization or non-member
organization. The transactions at issue
are not being done for the member or
member organization’s proprietary
account. Similarly, an away market
maker is a member of another national
securities exchange registered as a
market maker in an options class(es). An
away marker maker is considered to be
a Broker-Dealer as the market maker is
not subject to market making obligations
on the Exchange similar to other Phlx
Market Makers. The Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘CBOE’’) assesses manual equity option
JBO orders fees the same as brokerdealer and electronic equity option JBO
orders fees the same as a Professional.13
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to assess the same fees and
pay the same rebates on JBO orders as
are paid and assessed to a Broker-Dealer
because the Exchange believes a JBO
participant’s business is similar to that
of a Broker-Dealer and should therefore
be priced the same. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to assess JBO
orders pricing the same as BrokerDealers is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
will uniformly assess JBO orders the
same fees and pay the same rebates as
today are assessed and paid to a BrokerDealer.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to exclude all JBO orders
(member and non-member) from the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap and facilitation
waiver because JBO Orders will be
assessed fees and paid rebates the same
as Broker-Dealers and therefore should
not able to benefit from Firm pricing.
The Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to exclude all JBO orders
(member and non-member) from the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap and facilitation
waiver because the Exchange will
uniformly assess JBO orders the same
fees and pay the same rebates as today
are assessed and paid to a BrokerDealer. All JBO Orders would be
excluded from the Monthly Firm Fee
Cap and facilitation waiver uniformly.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
13 See
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
CBOE’s Fees Schedule.
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 90 / Friday, May 9, 2014 / Notices
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange is assessing fees to all JBOs
(member and non-member) in a similar
manner with this proposal. JBO
participants would be assessed fees and
paid rebates the same as Broker-Dealers.
The Exchange believes that assessing
JBO Orders the same as Broker-Dealers
does not impose a burden on
competition because a JBO participant’s
business is similar to that of a BrokerDealer and should therefore be priced
the same. JBO Orders are not being
transacted for the member or member
organization’s proprietary account.
Rather, JBO participants maintain JBO
arrangements with a JBO Broker
pursuant to Section 220.7 of Regulation
T. Also, today Firms and Broker-Dealer
fees are the same.
Further, utilizing an origin code to
identify JBO Orders does not impose an
unfair burden on competition. The
Exchange believes that automating the
process of manually identifying JBO
Orders by creating an identifiable
method of distinguishing JBO orders
entered into the Exchange’s Trading
System would assist the Exchange in
regulating its market. In addition, CBOE
utilizes an origin code today to identify
JBO Orders.
The Exchange’s proposal would
exclude both member and non-member
JBO Orders from the Monthly Firm Fee
Cap and firm facilitation waiver. Today,
member JBO Orders are eligible for the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap and firm
facilitation waiver, although there are
currently no members who send JBO
orders that have met the qualifications
for and have been afforded the benefit
of either the Monthly Firm Fee Cap or
Firm facilitation waiver. The Exchange
believes this proposal does not create an
undue burden on competition because
both member and non-member JBO
Orders would be treated equally.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 May 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 14 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–28 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2014–28. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
14 15
15 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26789
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2014–28, and should be submitted on or
before May 30, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–10651 Filed 5–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–72096; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2014–040]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Listing and Trading of
the Shares of the Calamos Focus
Growth ETF of the Calamos ETF Trust
May 5, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 21,
2014, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by Nasdaq. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to list and trade the
shares of the Calamos Focus Growth
ETF, formerly known as the Calamos
Select Growth ETF (the ‘‘Fund’’) of the
Calamos ETF Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’) under
Nasdaq Rule 5735 (‘‘Managed Fund
Shares’’).3 The shares of the Fund are
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Commission approved Nasdaq Rule 5735 in
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57962 (June
13, 2008), 73 FR 35175 (June 20, 2008) (SR–
NASDAQ–2008–039). There are already multiple
actively-managed funds listed on the Exchange; see
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66175
(February 29, 2012), 77 FR 13379 (March 6, 2012)
(SR–NASDAQ–2012–004) (order approving listing
and trading of WisdomTree Emerging Markets
Corporate Bond Fund). Additionally, the
1 15
Continued
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26787-26789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10651]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-72094; File No. SR-Phlx-2014-28]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
JBO Orders
May 5, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 1, 2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule to assess joint
back office (``JBO'') \3\ participants pricing the same as Broker-
Dealers \4\ and require JBO participants to utilize a new origin code
to identify JBO orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A JBO participant is a member, member organization or non-
member organization that maintains a JBO arrangement with a clearing
broker-dealer (``JBO Broker'') subject to the requirements of
Regulation T Section 220.7 of the Federal Reserve System. See also
Exchange Rule 703.
\4\ The term ``Broker-Dealer'' applies to any transaction which
is not subject to any of the other transaction fees applicable
within a particular category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes that the amendments become operative on July
1, 2014.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to introduce a new origin code to its Pricing
Schedule which will be used to indicate orders for a JBO account to be
cleared into the Firm range at The Options Clearing Corporation
(``OCC'') for purposes of pricing only. Further, the Exchange proposes
to assess fees and pay rebates to JBO Orders the same as Broker-
Dealers.
Currently, JBO orders clear in the Firm \5\ range at OCC as do Firm
orders. The Exchange is proposing to introduce an origin code for
members and member organizations to identify orders for a JBO account.
Today, the Exchange requires members and member organizations to notify
the Exchange in writing and indicate which accounts are used to
segregate orders of JBO participants from other Firm orders.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Firm'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Firm range at OCC.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62661 (August 13,
2010), 75 FR 49544 (August 6, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-110).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The origin code will simplify the process of identifying JBO orders
for purposes of pricing only. Members and member organizations would be
required to mark their JBO orders in accordance with the technical
specifications definitions which are provided by the Exchange. This
rule change will not impact the manner in which JBO orders are treated
for purposes of other Exchange Rules including but not limited to
priority in the Exchange's trading system. With this proposal, JBO
orders will continue to be cleared in the Firm range at OCC. Today, JBO
orders are assessed
[[Page 26788]]
transaction fees and paid rebates the same as Firms.
Non-member JBO orders are excluded from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap
\7\ and firm facilitation waiver.\8\ While member JBO Orders are
eligible for the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and firm facilitation waiver
today, there are currently no members who send JBO orders that have met
the qualifications for and have been afforded the benefit of either the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap or Firm facilitation waiver. With this proposal,
the Exchange proposes to exclude all JBO orders, member or non-member,
from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and Firm facilitation waiver. JBO
participants would be assessed fees and paid rebates the same as
Broker-Dealers as of July 1, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Firms are subject to a maximum fee of $75,000 (``Monthly
Firm Fee Cap''). Firm Floor Option Transaction Charges and QCC
Transaction Fees, in the aggregate, for one billing month may not
exceed the Monthly Firm Fee Cap per member organization when such
members are trading in their own proprietary account. All dividend,
merger, and short stock interest strategy executions (as defined in
Section II) are excluded from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. Reversal and
conversion, jelly roll and box spread strategy executions (as
defined in Section II) are included in the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. QCC
Transaction Fees are included in the calculation of the Monthly Firm
Fee Cap. Member organizations must notify the Exchange in writing of
all accounts in which the member is not trading in its own
proprietary account. The Exchange does not make adjustments to
billing invoices where transactions are commingled in accounts which
are not subject to the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. JBO participant charges
are not included in the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63780 (January 6, 2011), 76 FR 5846
(February 2, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-07).
\8\ A facilitation occurs when a floor broker holds an option
order for a public customer and a contra-side order for the same
options series and, after providing an opportunity for all persons
in the trading crowd to participate in the transaction, executes
both orders as a facilitation cross. See Exchange Rule 1064. The
Firm Floor Options Transaction Charges is waived for members
executing facilitation orders pursuant to Exchange Rule 1064 when
such members are trading in their own proprietary account (including
Cabinet Options Transaction Charges). The Firm Floor Options
Transaction Charges is waived for the buy side of a transaction if
the same member or its affiliates under Common Ownership represents
both sides of a Firm transaction when such members are trading in
their own proprietary account. In addition, the Broker-Dealer Floor
Options Transaction Charge (including Cabinet Options Transaction
Charges) is waived for members executing facilitation orders
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1064 when such members would otherwise
incur this charge for trading in their own proprietary account
contra to a Customer (``BD-Customer Facilitation''), if the member's
BD-Customer Facilitation average daily volume (including both FLEX
and non-FLEX transactions) exceeds 10,000 contracts per day in a
given month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule to
define the term JBO in the preface as follows: ``The term ``Joint Back
Office'' or ``JBO'' applies to any transaction that is identified by a
member or member organization for clearing in the Firm range at OCC and
is identified with an origin code as a JBO. A JBO will be priced the
same as a Broker-Dealer.'' Further a footnote describing a JBO is
included in the Preface to the Pricing Schedule. JBO Orders may be
entered electronically or on the Exchange's trading floor.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. Adding an origin code to JBO orders is a more efficient
manner in which to identify those orders separate and apart from other
orders entered on Phlx. In addition, JBO orders will continue to clear
in the Firm range at OCC as is the case today. The Exchange will more
easily be able to discern the pricing associated with clearly
identified JBO orders. This will eliminate any potential confusion,
thereby removing a potential impediment to and perfecting the mechanism
for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that automating this process of manually identifying JBO
Orders will promote just and equitable principles of trade by creating
an identifiable method of distinguishing JBO orders entered into the
Exchange's Trading System. The Exchange believes that automating this
process is a more efficient manner in which to identify and bill these
type of orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls, and is not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess
pricing for JBO orders the same as for Broker-Dealers is reasonable
because the Exchange believes that the business of a JBO is similar to
that of an away market maker and other Broker-Dealers. A JBO
participant maintains a JBO arrangement with a JBO Broker pursuant to
Section 220.7 of Regulation T. A JBO participant could be a member,
member organization or non-member organization. The transactions at
issue are not being done for the member or member organization's
proprietary account. Similarly, an away market maker is a member of
another national securities exchange registered as a market maker in an
options class(es). An away marker maker is considered to be a Broker-
Dealer as the market maker is not subject to market making obligations
on the Exchange similar to other Phlx Market Makers. The Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'') assesses manual equity option
JBO orders fees the same as broker-dealer and electronic equity option
JBO orders fees the same as a Professional.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
\13\ See CBOE's Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to assess the same fees
and pay the same rebates on JBO orders as are paid and assessed to a
Broker-Dealer because the Exchange believes a JBO participant's
business is similar to that of a Broker-Dealer and should therefore be
priced the same. The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess JBO
orders pricing the same as Broker-Dealers is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange will uniformly assess JBO orders
the same fees and pay the same rebates as today are assessed and paid
to a Broker-Dealer.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to exclude all JBO
orders (member and non-member) from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and
facilitation waiver because JBO Orders will be assessed fees and paid
rebates the same as Broker-Dealers and therefore should not able to
benefit from Firm pricing. The Exchange believes that it is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory to exclude all JBO orders (member and
non-member) from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and facilitation waiver
because the Exchange will uniformly assess JBO orders the same fees and
pay the same rebates as today are assessed and paid to a Broker-Dealer.
All JBO Orders would be excluded from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and
facilitation waiver uniformly.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not
[[Page 26789]]
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange is assessing fees to all JBOs (member and non-member) in a
similar manner with this proposal. JBO participants would be assessed
fees and paid rebates the same as Broker-Dealers. The Exchange believes
that assessing JBO Orders the same as Broker-Dealers does not impose a
burden on competition because a JBO participant's business is similar
to that of a Broker-Dealer and should therefore be priced the same. JBO
Orders are not being transacted for the member or member organization's
proprietary account. Rather, JBO participants maintain JBO arrangements
with a JBO Broker pursuant to Section 220.7 of Regulation T. Also,
today Firms and Broker-Dealer fees are the same.
Further, utilizing an origin code to identify JBO Orders does not
impose an unfair burden on competition. The Exchange believes that
automating the process of manually identifying JBO Orders by creating
an identifiable method of distinguishing JBO orders entered into the
Exchange's Trading System would assist the Exchange in regulating its
market. In addition, CBOE utilizes an origin code today to identify JBO
Orders.
The Exchange's proposal would exclude both member and non-member
JBO Orders from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and firm facilitation waiver.
Today, member JBO Orders are eligible for the Monthly Firm Fee Cap and
firm facilitation waiver, although there are currently no members who
send JBO orders that have met the qualifications for and have been
afforded the benefit of either the Monthly Firm Fee Cap or Firm
facilitation waiver. The Exchange believes this proposal does not
create an undue burden on competition because both member and non-
member JBO Orders would be treated equally.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2014-28 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2014-28. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2014-28,
and should be submitted on or before May 30, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-10651 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P