Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 26207-26208 [2014-10516]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales to the total entered value of those
sales. Where the assessment rate is
above de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to assess duties on all entries of subject
merchandise by that importer. Pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct
CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties any entries for
which the assessment rate is de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent).
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.16 This clarification applies
to entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by companies
examined in this review (i.e., companies
for which a dumping margin was
calculated) where the companies did
not know that their merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of these final
results of administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
companies covered by this review, the
cash deposit rate will be the rates listed
above; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies other than those
covered by this review, the cash deposit
rate will be the company-specific rate
established for the most recent period;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation, but the producer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the original investigation, the cash
deposit rate will be 3.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the original
investigation.17 These cash deposit
16 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
17 See CLPP Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent increase in antidumping
duties by the amount of antidumping
and/or countervailing duties
reimbursed.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
I. Summary
II. List of Comments in the Accompanying
Final Issues and Decision Memorandum:
Comment 1: Whether Navneet’s Claim for
Duty Drawback Adjustments Are Valid
Comment 2: Calculation Error Regarding
Navneet’s Drawback Credits
Comment 3: Whether Navneet’s Early
Payment Discounts and Other Rebates
Claims for Home Market Sales Are Valid
III. Background
IV. The Proper Rate To Apply to AR Printing,
the Non-Selected Respondent
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Analysis of Comments
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–10519 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26207
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–882]
Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Second Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on
refined brown aluminum oxide (RBAO)
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail is indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova or David
Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, Office
II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1280 or (202) 482–4136,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 19, 2003, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on
RBAO from the PRC.1 On February 3,
2014, the Department published the
notice of initiation of the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on RBAO from the PRC pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act.2 On February
14, 2014, the Department received a
Notice of Intent to Participate from the
following domestic producers of RBAO:
C–E Minerals, Inc., Imerys Fused
Minerals Niagara Falls, Inc., U.S.
Electrofused Minerals, Inc., and
Washington Mills Group, Inc.
(collectively ‘‘the domestic interested
parties’’), within the deadline specified
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Refined Brown
Aluminum Oxide (Otherwise Known as Refined
Brown Artificial Corundum or Brown Fused
Alumina) From the People’s Republic of China, 68
FR 65249 (November 19, 2003).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 6163 (February 3, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
26208
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
a domestic like product in the United
States. We received a complete
substantive response from the domestic
interested parties within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
substantive responses from any
respondent interested parties. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is ground, pulverized or refined
brown artificial corundum, also known
as brown aluminum oxide or brown
fused alumina, in grit size of 3⁄8 inch or
less. The merchandise covered by this
order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 2818.10.20.00 and
2818.10.20.90 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and for
customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise is
dispositive.3
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review is provided in the
accompanying Decision Memo. The
issues discussed in the Decision Memo
include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were to be revoked.
The Decision Memo is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is
available in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Decision
Memo are identical in content.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of Sunset Review
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on RBAO from
the PRC would be likely to lead to
3 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
titled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Refined
Brown Aluminum Oxide from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with and
adopted by this notice (Decision Memo).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the following weighted-average
percentage margins:
Manufacturers/exporters/
producers
Zibo Jinyu Abrasive Co., Ltd
PRC-wide ..............................
Michael A. Romani or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
WeightedInternational Trade Administration,
average
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
margin
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
(percent)
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
135.18 482–0198 or (202) 482–1690,
135.18 respectively.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative an protective order
(APO) of their responsibility concerning
the return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–10516 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–929]
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 2, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the initiation of
the first sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC)
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The
Department finds that revocation of this
antidumping duty order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Sunset Review’’ section of
this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2014.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 26, 2009, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on small diameter graphite electrodes
from the PRC.1 On January 2, 2014, the
Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset review of the
Antidumping Duty Order.2 The
Department received a notice of intent
to participate in this sunset review from
GrafTech USA LLC, SGL Carbon LLC,
and Superior Graphite Company
(collectively, domestic interested
parties), within the 15-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
The domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
domestic like product.
The Department received an adequate
substantive response to the Initiation
from the domestic interested parties
within the 30-day period specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department
received no substantive response from
respondent interested parties. In
accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the Antidumping Duty
Order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes all small diameter graphite
electrodes with a nominal or actual
diameter of 400 millimeters (16 inches)
or less and graphite pin joining systems
for small diameter graphite electrodes.
Small diameter graphite electrodes and
graphite pin joining systems for small
diameter graphite electrodes that are
subject to the order are currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 8545.11.0010, 3801.10, and
8545.11.0020. While the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Small Diameter
Graphite Electrodes from the People’s Republic of
China, 74 FR 8775 (February 26, 2009)
(Antidumping Duty Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
79 FR 110 (January 2, 2014) (Initiation).
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26207-26208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-882]
Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
refined brown aluminum oxide (RBAO) from the People's Republic of China
(PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail is indicated in
the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova or David
Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1280 or (202) 482-4136, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 19, 2003, the Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on RBAO from the PRC.\1\ On
February 3, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of
the second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on RBAO from the
PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.\2\ On February 14, 2014, the
Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate from the
following domestic producers of RBAO: C-E Minerals, Inc., Imerys Fused
Minerals Niagara Falls, Inc., U.S. Electrofused Minerals, Inc., and
Washington Mills Group, Inc. (collectively ``the domestic interested
parties''), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
[[Page 26208]]
a domestic like product in the United States. We received a complete
substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-
day) sunset review of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide
(Otherwise Known as Refined Brown Artificial Corundum or Brown Fused
Alumina) From the People's Republic of China, 68 FR 65249 (November
19, 2003).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 6163
(February 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is ground, pulverized or
refined brown artificial corundum, also known as brown aluminum oxide
or brown fused alumina, in grit size of \3/8\ inch or less. The
merchandise covered by this order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 2818.10.20.00 and 2818.10.20.90 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see
Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Refined Brown
Aluminum Oxide from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Decision Memo).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this review is
provided in the accompanying Decision Memo. The issues discussed in the
Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order
were to be revoked. The Decision Memo is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046
of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Decision Memo are
identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on RBAO
from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturers/exporters/ producers margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zibo Jinyu Abrasive Co., Ltd............................ 135.18
PRC-wide................................................ 135.18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative an protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-10516 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
