Health Care Continuation Coverage, 26192-26195 [2014-10416]
Download as PDF
26192
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
2. Removing from the last sentence of
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) Example 2 ‘‘Y’’ and
adding ‘‘X’’ in its place.
■ 3. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3)(i) as
paragraph (b)(3).
■ 4. Removing paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
■ 5. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Written comments may be
submitted to the Department of Labor as
specified below. Any comment that is
submitted will be shared with the other
Departments and will also be made
available to the public. Warning: Do not
include any personally identifiable
information (such as name, address, or
other contact information) or
confidential business information that
you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the Internet
and can be retrieved by most Internet
search engines. No deletions,
modifications, or redactions will be
made to the comments received, as they
are public records. Comments may be
submitted anonymously.
Comments, identified by ‘‘Health Care
Continuation Coverage,’’ may be
submitted by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of
Health Plan Standards and Compliance
Assistance, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N–5653, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: Health Care Continuation
Coverage.
Comments received will be posted
without change to www.regulations.gov
and available for public inspection at
the Public Disclosure Room, N–1513,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210,
including any personal information
provided.
29 CFR Part 2590
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
■
§ 1.381(a)–1 General rule relating to
carryovers in certain corporate
acquisitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * * (i) * * * In a transaction to
which section 381(a)(2) applies, the
acquiring corporation is the corporation
that, pursuant to the plan of
reorganization, directly acquires the
assets transferred by the transferor
corporation, even if that corporation
ultimately retains none of the assets so
transferred.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * Paragraph (b)(2) of this
section applies to transactions occurring
on or after the date of publication of the
Treasury decision adopting this rule as
a final regulation in the Federal
Register.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014–10500 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
RIN 1210–AB65
Health Care Continuation Coverage
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Proposed rules.
AGENCIES:
These proposed regulations
contain amendments to notice
requirements of the health care
continuation coverage (COBRA)
provisions of Part 6 of title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) to better align the
provision of guidance under the COBRA
notice requirements with the Affordable
Care Act provisions already in effect, as
well as any provisions of federal law
that will become applicable in the
future.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
of proposed rulemaking are invited and
must be received by July 7, 2014.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
ADDRESSES:
Amy Turner or Elizabeth Schumacher,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Department of Labor.
Customer service information:
Individuals interested in obtaining
information from the Department of
Labor concerning employment-based
health coverage laws may call the EBSA
Toll-Free Hotline at 1–866–444–EBSA
(3272) or visit the Department of Labor’s
Web site (www.dol.gov/ebsa).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The continuation coverage provisions,
sections 601 through 608 of title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act (ERISA), were enacted as part of the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA),
which also promulgated parallel
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
(the Code) and the Public Health Service
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Act (the PHS Act).1 These provisions are
commonly referred to as the COBRA
provisions, and the continuation
coverage that they mandate is
commonly referred to as COBRA
coverage. COBRA, as enacted, provides
that the Secretary of Labor (the
Secretary) has the authority under
section 608 to carry out the provisions
of part 6 of title I of ERISA. The
Conference Report that accompanied
COBRA divided interpretive authority
over the COBRA provisions between the
Secretary and the Secretary of the
Treasury (the Treasury) by providing
that the Secretary has the authority to
issue regulations implementing the
notice and disclosure requirements of
COBRA, while the Treasury is
authorized to issue regulations defining
the required continuation coverage.2
On May 26, 2004, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued final
regulations implementing various
provisions of the COBRA notice
requirements and model notices to
facilitate compliance with the
requirement to provide the general
notice of continuation coverage (general
notice) as well as COBRA continuation
election notice (election notice).3 The
model general notice was issued in an
appendix to § 2590.606–1 and the model
election notice was issued in an
appendix to § 2590.606–4.
In general, under COBRA, group
health plans must provide a written
notice of COBRA rights to each covered
employee and spouse (if any) ‘‘at the
time of commencement of coverage’’
under the plan. Generally, the notice
must be furnished to each covered
employee and to the employee’s spouse
(if covered under the plan) not later
than the earlier of: (1) Either 90 days
from the date on which the covered
employee or spouse first becomes
covered under the plan or, if later, the
date on which the plan first becomes
subject to the continuation coverage
requirements; or (2) the date on which
1 The Code and PHS Act COBRA provisions,
although very similar in other ways, are not
identical to the COBRA provisions in title I of
ERISA in their scope of application. The PHS Act
provisions apply only to State and local
governmental plans, and the Code provisions grant
COBRA rights to individuals who would not be
considered participants or beneficiaries under
ERISA. See PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300bb–8; Code
section 5000(b)(1).
2 H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 99–453, 99th Cong., 1st
Sess., at 562–63 (1985). The Conference Report
further indicates that the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, who is to issue regulations
implementing the continuation coverage
requirements for State and local governments, must
conform the actual requirements of those
regulations to the regulations issued by the
Secretary and the Treasury. Id. at 563.
3 69 FR 30084 (May, 26, 2004).
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the administrator is required to furnish
an election notice to the employee or to
his or her spouse or dependent.4
In addition to the general notice,
group health plans must provide an
election notice at the time of certain
qualifying events.5 In general, an
individual who was covered by a group
health plan on the day before a
qualifying event occurred may be able to
elect COBRA continuation coverage
upon a qualifying event (such as
termination of employment or reduction
in hours that causes loss of coverage
under the plan).6 Individuals with such
a right are called qualified beneficiaries.
A group health plan must provide
qualified beneficiaries with an election
notice, which describes their rights to
continuation coverage and how to make
an election. The election notice must be
provided to the qualified beneficiaries
within 14 days after the plan
administrator receives the notice of a
qualifying event.
On May 8, 2013, the Department
issued Technical Release 2013–02 and
an updated model election notice with
additional information regarding health
coverage options that will be available
beginning January 1, 2014 under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (Affordable Care Act).7 The
guidance highlighted that some
qualified beneficiaries may want to
consider and compare health coverage
alternatives to COBRA continuation
coverage that are available through a
new competitive private health
insurance market—the Health Insurance
Marketplace (Marketplace). The
Department also noted that some
qualified beneficiaries may also be
eligible for a premium tax credit (a tax
credit to help pay for some or all of the
cost of coverage in plans offered through
the Marketplace).
These proposed regulations amend
paragraph (g) of § 2590.606–1 and
paragraph (g) of § 2590.606–4 and delete
the two appendices containing the
model notices to better facilitate
provision of updated model election
notices and solicit comment before
promulgation of final regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Overview of the Proposed
Regulations
These proposed regulations contain
amendments to notice requirements of
4 See
29 CFR 2590.606–1.
29 CFR 2590.606–4.
6 For more information on COBRA continuation
coverage requirements applicable to group health
plans, see ‘‘An Employer’s Guide to Group Health
Continuation Coverage Under COBRA,’’ available at
www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/
cobraemployer.html.
7 See Technical Release 2013–02 available at
https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr13-02.html.
5 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
the COBRA provisions of Part 6 of title
I of ERISA to better align the provision
of guidance under the COBRA notice
requirements with the Affordable Care
Act provisions already in effect, as well
as provide valuable flexibility to
respond to provisions of federal law that
will become applicable in the future.
The proposed amendment will
eliminate the current version of the
model general notice contained in the
appendix of § 2590.606–1 and the model
election notice contained in the
appendix of § 2590.606–4 as these
model notices are outdated.
Additionally, these proposed
regulations make technical changes to
the instruction language pointing to the
model notices in the appendices in
paragraph (g) of § 2590.606–1 and
paragraph (g) of § 2590.606–4. These
changes will permit the Department to
amend the model notices as necessary
and provide the most current versions of
the model notices on the Department’s
Web site. These changes will also
eliminate confusion that may result
from multiple versions of the model
notices being available in different
locations. Contemporaneous with
issuance of these proposed regulations,
the Department is also issuing updated
versions of the model general notice and
model election notice, as well as
guidance announcing the availability of
such updated notices. These updated
notices reflect that coverage is now
available in the Marketplace and the
updated model election notice provides
information on special enrollment rights
in the Marketplace. The Department
invites comment on ways to improve or
streamline the model notices, whether
the Department’s provision of new
model notices is sufficient and, if not,
whether the Department should expand
the underlying content requirements or
require use of mandatory language.
The updated model notices are
available in modifiable, electronic form
on the Department’s Web site at
www.dol.gov/ebsa/cobra.html. As with
the earlier models, in order to use these
model notices properly, the plan
administrator must complete them by
filling in the blanks with the
appropriate plan information. Until
rulemaking is finalized and effective,
the Department of Labor will consider
use of the model notices available on its
Web site, appropriately completed, to be
good faith compliance with the notice
content requirements of COBRA. The
Department notes that the use of the
model notices is not required. The
model notices are provided solely for
the purpose of facilitating compliance
with the applicable notice requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26193
III. Economic Impact and Paperwork
Burden
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing and
streamlining rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
Under Executive Order 12866,
‘‘significant’’ regulatory actions are
subject to the requirements of the
executive order and review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule (1) having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely and materially affecting a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local or
tribal governments or communities (also
referred to as ‘‘economically
significant’’); (2) creating serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfering
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially altering
the budgetary impacts of entitlement
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. Pursuant to the terms of the
Executive Order, OMB has determined
that this action is not ‘‘significant’’
within the meaning of section 3(f) of the
Executive Order. Therefore, the
proposed rule was reviewed by OMB.
However, because the rule merely
removes the model notices from the CFR
and the model notices themselves
remain voluntary, the Department does
not expect this rulemaking to result in
significant costs or benefits.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to
Federal rules that are subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the APA (5 U.S.C. 551
et seq.) and are likely to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
26194
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Unless an agency certifies that such a
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, section 603 of
the RFA requires the agency to present
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
at the time of the publication of the
rulemaking describing the impact of the
rule on small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, organizations
and governmental jurisdictions.
As discussed above, the proposed rule
would amend the 2004 final regulation
by deleting references to the model
notices and two appendices containing
the model notices to better facilitate
provision of updated model election
notices and solicit comment before
promulgation of final regulations. The
proposed rule does not make any
material changes to the notices.
Therefore, the Department hereby
certifies that the proposed rule is not
likely to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Department welcomes
public comments regarding its
certification.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Office of Management and Budget
approved the COBRA model notice
information collection request under
OMB Control Number 1210–0123,
which is scheduled to expire on October
31, 2016. As discussed above, the
proposed rule would amend the 2004
final regulation by deleting references to
the model notices and two appendices
containing the model notices to better
facilitate provision of updated model
election notices and solicit comment
before promulgation of final regulations.
The Department does not believe that
these minor modifications implement
any substantive or material change to
the information collection; therefore, no
further review is requested of OMB at
this time. The Department solicits
comment on this understanding.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Congressional Review Act
This proposed rule is subject to the
Congressional Review Act provisions of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and, if finalized, will
be transmitted to Congress and the
Comptroller General for review.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), as well as Executive Order
12875, this proposed rule does not
include any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures by State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate of
more than $100 million, adjusted for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
inflation, or increase expenditures by
the private sector of more than $100
million, adjusted for inflation.
PART 2590—RULES AND
REGULATIONS FOR GROUP HEALTH
PLANS
F. Federalism Statement
■
Executive Order 13132 (Aug. 4, 1999)
outlines fundamental principles of
federalism and requires the adherence
to specific criteria by Federal agencies
in the process of their formulation and
implementation of policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This proposed
rule does not have federalism
implications because it has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Section 514 of
ERISA provides, with certain exceptions
specifically enumerated, that the
provisions of titles I and IV of ERISA
supersede any and all laws of the States
as they relate to any employee benefit
plan covered under ERISA. The
requirements implemented in this rule
do not alter the fundamental provisions
of the statute with respect to employee
benefit plans, and as such would have
no implications for the States or the
relationship or distribution of power
between the national government and
the States.
IV. Statutory Authority
The Department of Labor regulations
are adopted pursuant to the authority
contained in 29 U.S.C. 1027, 1059, 1135,
1161–1168, 1169, 1181–1183, 1181 note,
1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1185c, 1185d, 1191,
1191a, 1191b, and 1191c; sec. 101(g),
Pub. L. 104–191, 110 Stat. 1936; sec.
401(b), Pub. L. 105–200, 112 Stat. 645
(42 U.S.C. 651 note); sec. 512(d), Pub. L.
110–343, 122 Stat. 3881; sec. 1001,
1201, and 1562(e), Pub. L. 111–148, 124
Stat. 119, as amended by Pub. L. 111–
152, 124 Stat. 1029; Secretary of Labor’s
Order 1–2011, 77 FR 1088 (January 9,
2012).
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2590
Continuation coverage, Disclosure,
Employee benefit plans, Group health
plans, Health care, Health insurance,
Medical child support, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2590 as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. The authority citation for part 2590
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1027, 1059, 1135,
1161–1168, 1169, 1181–1183, 1181 note,
1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1185c, 1185d, 1191,
1191a, 1191b, and 1191c; sec. 101(g), Pub. L.
104–191, 110 Stat. 1936; sec. 401(b), Pub. L.
105–200, 112 Stat. 645 (42 U.S.C. 651 note);
sec. 512(d), Pub. L. 110–343, 122 Stat. 3881;
sec. 1001, 1201, and 1562(e), Pub. L. 111–
148, 124 Stat. 119, as amended by Pub. L.
111–152, 124 Stat. 1029; Secretary of Labor’s
Order 1–2011, 77 FR 1088 (January 9, 2012).
2. Section 2590.606–1 is amended by
removing the appendix to the section,
and revising paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
■
§ 2590.606–1 General notice of
continuation coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Model notice. The requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section are satisfied
with respect to a single-employer group
health plan if the plan provides a notice
in accordance with the model certificate
authorized by the Secretary,
appropriately modified and
supplemented as necessary, consistent
with guidance issued by the Secretary.
Use of the model notice is not
mandatory. The model notice reflects
the requirements of this section as they
would apply to single-employer group
health plans and must be modified if
used to provide notice with respect to
other types of group health plans, such
as multiemployer plans or plans
established and maintained by
employee organizations for their
members. In order to use the model
notice, administrators must
appropriately add relevant information
where indicated in the model notice,
select among alternative language, and
supplement the model notice to reflect
applicable plan provisions. Items of
information that are not applicable to a
particular plan may be deleted. Use of
the model notice, appropriately
modified and supplemented, will be
deemed to satisfy the notice content
requirements of paragraph (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 2590.606–4 is amended by
removing the appendix to the section,
and revising paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
§ 2590.606–4 Notice requirements for plan
administrators.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Model notice. The requirements of
paragraph (b)(4) of this section are
satisfied with respect to a plan
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
administrator if the plan provides a
notice in accordance with the model
certificate authorized by the Secretary,
appropriately modified and
supplemented as necessary, consistent
with guidance issued by the Secretary.
Use of the model notice is not
mandatory. The model notice reflects
the requirements of this section as they
would apply to single-employer group
health plans and must be modified if
used to provide notice with respect to
other types of group health plans, such
as multiemployer plans or plans
established and maintained by
employee organizations for their
members. In order to use the model
notice, administrators must
appropriately add relevant information
where indicated in the model notice,
select among alternative language, and
supplement the model notice to reflect
applicable plan provisions. Items of
information that are not applicable to a
particular plan may be deleted. Use of
the model notice, appropriately
modified and supplemented, will be
deemed to satisfy the notice content
requirements of paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed this 1st day of May, 2014.
Phyllis C. Borzi,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014–10416 Filed 5–2–14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0108]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events, Choptank River; Between
Cambridge, MD and Trappe, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its proposed rule
concerning amendments to the regattas
and marine parades regulations. The
rulemaking was intended to establish
special local regulations during the
swim segment of the ‘‘Choptank Bridge
Swim,’’ a marine event to be held on the
waters of Choptank River between
Cambridge, MD and Trappe, MD on May
10, 2014. The Coast Guard was notified
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
on April 9, 2014 that the event had been
cancelled.
DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn
on May 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. You may also find this docket
on the Internet by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG
2014–0108 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice,
call or email Mr. Ronald Houck,
Waterways Management Division,
Sector Baltimore, MD, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 410–576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing material in the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 18, 2014, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking entitled
‘‘Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events, Choptank River; Between
Cambridge, MD and Trappe, MD’’ in the
Federal Register (79 FR 15068). The
rulemaking concerned the Coast Guard’s
proposal to establish temporary special
local regulations on specified waters of
Choptank River between Cambridge,
MD and Trappe, MD, effective from 9
a.m. to 3 p.m. on May 20, 2014. The
regulated area included all waters of the
Choptank River, from shoreline to
shoreline, within and area bounded on
the east by a line drawn from latitude
38°35′13″ N, longitude 076°02′33″ W,
thence south to latitude 38°33′50″ N,
longitude 076°02′07″ W, and bounded
on the west by a line drawn from
latitude 38°35′37″ N, longitude
076°03′09″ W, thence south to latitude
38°34′25″ N, longitude 076°04′05″ W,
located at Cambridge, MD. The
regulations were needed to temporarily
restrict vessel traffic during the event to
provide for the safety of participants,
spectators and other transiting vessels.
Withdrawal
The Coast Guard is withdrawing this
rulemaking because the event has been
cancelled.
Authority
We issue this notice of withdrawal
under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 1233.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26195
Dated: April 16, 2014.
M.M. Dean,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2014–10381 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0819]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage; Ashley River Anchorage,
Ashley River, Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the special anchorage area
located on the Ashley River, in
Charleston, SC. The change is necessary
to accommodate the expansion of the
Charleston City Marina and meet the
requirements of 33 CFR 109.10. The
change will ensure that there is
sufficient space to accommodate vessels
desiring to anchor in the area, while
allowing a sufficient buffer between the
federal channel and special anchorage.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 6, 2014. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before June 6, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher
Ruleman, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26192-26195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10416]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
29 CFR Part 2590
RIN 1210-AB65
Health Care Continuation Coverage
AGENCIES: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Proposed rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These proposed regulations contain amendments to notice
requirements of the health care continuation coverage (COBRA)
provisions of Part 6 of title I of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to better align the provision of guidance
under the COBRA notice requirements with the Affordable Care Act
provisions already in effect, as well as any provisions of federal law
that will become applicable in the future.
DATES: Written comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking are
invited and must be received by July 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to the Department of Labor
as specified below. Any comment that is submitted will be shared with
the other Departments and will also be made available to the public.
Warning: Do not include any personally identifiable information (such
as name, address, or other contact information) or confidential
business information that you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the Internet and can be retrieved by most
Internet search engines. No deletions, modifications, or redactions
will be made to the comments received, as they are public records.
Comments may be submitted anonymously.
Comments, identified by ``Health Care Continuation Coverage,'' may
be submitted by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of Health Plan Standards and
Compliance Assistance, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room
N-5653, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, Attention: Health Care Continuation Coverage.
Comments received will be posted without change to
www.regulations.gov and available for public inspection at the Public
Disclosure Room, N-1513, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Turner or Elizabeth Schumacher,
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor.
Customer service information: Individuals interested in obtaining
information from the Department of Labor concerning employment-based
health coverage laws may call the EBSA Toll-Free Hotline at 1-866-444-
EBSA (3272) or visit the Department of Labor's Web site (www.dol.gov/ebsa).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The continuation coverage provisions, sections 601 through 608 of
title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), were
enacted as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
of 1985 (COBRA), which also promulgated parallel provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and the Public Health Service Act (the
PHS Act).\1\ These provisions are commonly referred to as the COBRA
provisions, and the continuation coverage that they mandate is commonly
referred to as COBRA coverage. COBRA, as enacted, provides that the
Secretary of Labor (the Secretary) has the authority under section 608
to carry out the provisions of part 6 of title I of ERISA. The
Conference Report that accompanied COBRA divided interpretive authority
over the COBRA provisions between the Secretary and the Secretary of
the Treasury (the Treasury) by providing that the Secretary has the
authority to issue regulations implementing the notice and disclosure
requirements of COBRA, while the Treasury is authorized to issue
regulations defining the required continuation coverage.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Code and PHS Act COBRA provisions, although very similar
in other ways, are not identical to the COBRA provisions in title I
of ERISA in their scope of application. The PHS Act provisions apply
only to State and local governmental plans, and the Code provisions
grant COBRA rights to individuals who would not be considered
participants or beneficiaries under ERISA. See PHS Act, 42 U.S.C.
300bb-8; Code section 5000(b)(1).
\2\ H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 99-453, 99th Cong., 1st Sess., at 562-63
(1985). The Conference Report further indicates that the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, who is to issue regulations
implementing the continuation coverage requirements for State and
local governments, must conform the actual requirements of those
regulations to the regulations issued by the Secretary and the
Treasury. Id. at 563.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 26, 2004, the Department of Labor (Department) issued final
regulations implementing various provisions of the COBRA notice
requirements and model notices to facilitate compliance with the
requirement to provide the general notice of continuation coverage
(general notice) as well as COBRA continuation election notice
(election notice).\3\ The model general notice was issued in an
appendix to Sec. 2590.606-1 and the model election notice was issued
in an appendix to Sec. 2590.606-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 69 FR 30084 (May, 26, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In general, under COBRA, group health plans must provide a written
notice of COBRA rights to each covered employee and spouse (if any)
``at the time of commencement of coverage'' under the plan. Generally,
the notice must be furnished to each covered employee and to the
employee's spouse (if covered under the plan) not later than the
earlier of: (1) Either 90 days from the date on which the covered
employee or spouse first becomes covered under the plan or, if later,
the date on which the plan first becomes subject to the continuation
coverage requirements; or (2) the date on which
[[Page 26193]]
the administrator is required to furnish an election notice to the
employee or to his or her spouse or dependent.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 29 CFR 2590.606-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the general notice, group health plans must provide
an election notice at the time of certain qualifying events.\5\ In
general, an individual who was covered by a group health plan on the
day before a qualifying event occurred may be able to elect COBRA
continuation coverage upon a qualifying event (such as termination of
employment or reduction in hours that causes loss of coverage under the
plan).\6\ Individuals with such a right are called qualified
beneficiaries. A group health plan must provide qualified beneficiaries
with an election notice, which describes their rights to continuation
coverage and how to make an election. The election notice must be
provided to the qualified beneficiaries within 14 days after the plan
administrator receives the notice of a qualifying event.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 29 CFR 2590.606-4.
\6\ For more information on COBRA continuation coverage
requirements applicable to group health plans, see ``An Employer's
Guide to Group Health Continuation Coverage Under COBRA,'' available
at www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/cobraemployer.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 8, 2013, the Department issued Technical Release 2013-02 and
an updated model election notice with additional information regarding
health coverage options that will be available beginning January 1,
2014 under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable
Care Act).\7\ The guidance highlighted that some qualified
beneficiaries may want to consider and compare health coverage
alternatives to COBRA continuation coverage that are available through
a new competitive private health insurance market--the Health Insurance
Marketplace (Marketplace). The Department also noted that some
qualified beneficiaries may also be eligible for a premium tax credit
(a tax credit to help pay for some or all of the cost of coverage in
plans offered through the Marketplace).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Technical Release 2013-02 available at https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr13-02.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed regulations amend paragraph (g) of Sec. 2590.606-1
and paragraph (g) of Sec. 2590.606-4 and delete the two appendices
containing the model notices to better facilitate provision of updated
model election notices and solicit comment before promulgation of final
regulations.
II. Overview of the Proposed Regulations
These proposed regulations contain amendments to notice
requirements of the COBRA provisions of Part 6 of title I of ERISA to
better align the provision of guidance under the COBRA notice
requirements with the Affordable Care Act provisions already in effect,
as well as provide valuable flexibility to respond to provisions of
federal law that will become applicable in the future. The proposed
amendment will eliminate the current version of the model general
notice contained in the appendix of Sec. 2590.606-1 and the model
election notice contained in the appendix of Sec. 2590.606-4 as these
model notices are outdated. Additionally, these proposed regulations
make technical changes to the instruction language pointing to the
model notices in the appendices in paragraph (g) of Sec. 2590.606-1
and paragraph (g) of Sec. 2590.606-4. These changes will permit the
Department to amend the model notices as necessary and provide the most
current versions of the model notices on the Department's Web site.
These changes will also eliminate confusion that may result from
multiple versions of the model notices being available in different
locations. Contemporaneous with issuance of these proposed regulations,
the Department is also issuing updated versions of the model general
notice and model election notice, as well as guidance announcing the
availability of such updated notices. These updated notices reflect
that coverage is now available in the Marketplace and the updated model
election notice provides information on special enrollment rights in
the Marketplace. The Department invites comment on ways to improve or
streamline the model notices, whether the Department's provision of new
model notices is sufficient and, if not, whether the Department should
expand the underlying content requirements or require use of mandatory
language.
The updated model notices are available in modifiable, electronic
form on the Department's Web site at www.dol.gov/ebsa/cobra.html. As
with the earlier models, in order to use these model notices properly,
the plan administrator must complete them by filling in the blanks with
the appropriate plan information. Until rulemaking is finalized and
effective, the Department of Labor will consider use of the model
notices available on its Web site, appropriately completed, to be good
faith compliance with the notice content requirements of COBRA. The
Department notes that the use of the model notices is not required. The
model notices are provided solely for the purpose of facilitating
compliance with the applicable notice requirements.
III. Economic Impact and Paperwork Burden
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing and streamlining rules, and
of promoting flexibility.
Under Executive Order 12866, ``significant'' regulatory actions are
subject to the requirements of the executive order and review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that is
likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2)
creating serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially altering the
budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or
the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, OMB has determined that
this action is not ``significant'' within the meaning of section 3(f)
of the Executive Order. Therefore, the proposed rule was reviewed by
OMB. However, because the rule merely removes the model notices from
the CFR and the model notices themselves remain voluntary, the
Department does not expect this rulemaking to result in significant
costs or benefits.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to Federal rules that are subject to
the notice and comment requirements of section 553(b) of the APA (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and are likely to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 26194]]
Unless an agency certifies that such a rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, section 603
of the RFA requires the agency to present an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis at the time of the publication of the rulemaking
describing the impact of the rule on small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, organizations and governmental jurisdictions.
As discussed above, the proposed rule would amend the 2004 final
regulation by deleting references to the model notices and two
appendices containing the model notices to better facilitate provision
of updated model election notices and solicit comment before
promulgation of final regulations. The proposed rule does not make any
material changes to the notices. Therefore, the Department hereby
certifies that the proposed rule is not likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
Department welcomes public comments regarding its certification.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Office of Management and Budget approved the COBRA model notice
information collection request under OMB Control Number 1210-0123,
which is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2016. As discussed above,
the proposed rule would amend the 2004 final regulation by deleting
references to the model notices and two appendices containing the model
notices to better facilitate provision of updated model election
notices and solicit comment before promulgation of final regulations.
The Department does not believe that these minor modifications
implement any substantive or material change to the information
collection; therefore, no further review is requested of OMB at this
time. The Department solicits comment on this understanding.
D. Congressional Review Act
This proposed rule is subject to the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and, if finalized, will be transmitted to
Congress and the Comptroller General for review.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4), as well as Executive Order 12875, this proposed rule does not
include any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by State,
local, or tribal governments in the aggregate of more than $100
million, adjusted for inflation, or increase expenditures by the
private sector of more than $100 million, adjusted for inflation.
F. Federalism Statement
Executive Order 13132 (Aug. 4, 1999) outlines fundamental
principles of federalism and requires the adherence to specific
criteria by Federal agencies in the process of their formulation and
implementation of policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications because it has no substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Section 514 of ERISA provides, with
certain exceptions specifically enumerated, that the provisions of
titles I and IV of ERISA supersede any and all laws of the States as
they relate to any employee benefit plan covered under ERISA. The
requirements implemented in this rule do not alter the fundamental
provisions of the statute with respect to employee benefit plans, and
as such would have no implications for the States or the relationship
or distribution of power between the national government and the
States.
IV. Statutory Authority
The Department of Labor regulations are adopted pursuant to the
authority contained in 29 U.S.C. 1027, 1059, 1135, 1161-1168, 1169,
1181-1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1185c, 1185d, 1191, 1191a,
1191b, and 1191c; sec. 101(g), Pub. L. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936; sec.
401(b), Pub. L. 105-200, 112 Stat. 645 (42 U.S.C. 651 note); sec.
512(d), Pub. L. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3881; sec. 1001, 1201, and 1562(e),
Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, as amended by Pub. L. 111-152, 124
Stat. 1029; Secretary of Labor's Order 1-2011, 77 FR 1088 (January 9,
2012).
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2590
Continuation coverage, Disclosure, Employee benefit plans, Group
health plans, Health care, Health insurance, Medical child support,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2590 as follows:
PART 2590--RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR GROUP HEALTH PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2590 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1027, 1059, 1135, 1161-1168, 1169, 1181-
1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1185c, 1185d, 1191, 1191a,
1191b, and 1191c; sec. 101(g), Pub. L. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936; sec.
401(b), Pub. L. 105-200, 112 Stat. 645 (42 U.S.C. 651 note); sec.
512(d), Pub. L. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3881; sec. 1001, 1201, and
1562(e), Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, as amended by Pub. L. 111-
152, 124 Stat. 1029; Secretary of Labor's Order 1-2011, 77 FR 1088
(January 9, 2012).
0
2. Section 2590.606-1 is amended by removing the appendix to the
section, and revising paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 2590.606-1 General notice of continuation coverage.
* * * * *
(g) Model notice. The requirements of paragraph (c) of this section
are satisfied with respect to a single-employer group health plan if
the plan provides a notice in accordance with the model certificate
authorized by the Secretary, appropriately modified and supplemented as
necessary, consistent with guidance issued by the Secretary. Use of the
model notice is not mandatory. The model notice reflects the
requirements of this section as they would apply to single-employer
group health plans and must be modified if used to provide notice with
respect to other types of group health plans, such as multiemployer
plans or plans established and maintained by employee organizations for
their members. In order to use the model notice, administrators must
appropriately add relevant information where indicated in the model
notice, select among alternative language, and supplement the model
notice to reflect applicable plan provisions. Items of information that
are not applicable to a particular plan may be deleted. Use of the
model notice, appropriately modified and supplemented, will be deemed
to satisfy the notice content requirements of paragraph (c) of this
section.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 2590.606-4 is amended by removing the appendix to the
section, and revising paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 2590.606-4 Notice requirements for plan administrators.
* * * * *
(g) Model notice. The requirements of paragraph (b)(4) of this
section are satisfied with respect to a plan
[[Page 26195]]
administrator if the plan provides a notice in accordance with the
model certificate authorized by the Secretary, appropriately modified
and supplemented as necessary, consistent with guidance issued by the
Secretary. Use of the model notice is not mandatory. The model notice
reflects the requirements of this section as they would apply to
single-employer group health plans and must be modified if used to
provide notice with respect to other types of group health plans, such
as multiemployer plans or plans established and maintained by employee
organizations for their members. In order to use the model notice,
administrators must appropriately add relevant information where
indicated in the model notice, select among alternative language, and
supplement the model notice to reflect applicable plan provisions.
Items of information that are not applicable to a particular plan may
be deleted. Use of the model notice, appropriately modified and
supplemented, will be deemed to satisfy the notice content requirements
of paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
* * * * *
Signed this 1st day of May, 2014.
Phyllis C. Borzi,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration,
Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014-10416 Filed 5-2-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P